e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
2008.
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM
TO
.
Commission File Number: 0-26176
DISH Network Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Nevada
|
|
88-0336997 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or
organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
9601 South Meridian Boulevard
Englewood, Colorado
|
|
80112 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip code) |
(303) 723-1000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer þ |
Accelerated filer o |
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
As of October 15, 2008, the registrants outstanding common stock consisted of 208,622,455 shares
of Class A common stock and 238,435,208 shares of Class B common stock.
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
DISCLOSURE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
We make forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform
Act of 1995 throughout this report. Whenever you read a statement that is not simply a statement
of historical fact (such as when we describe what we believe, intend, plan, estimate,
expect or anticipate will occur and other similar statements), you must remember that our
expectations may not be achieved, even though we believe they are reasonable. We do not guarantee
that any future transactions or events described herein will happen as described or that they will
happen at all. You should read this report completely and with the understanding that actual
future results may be materially different from what we expect. Whether actual events or results
will conform with our expectations and predictions is subject to a number of risks and
uncertainties. The risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the following:
|
|
|
We face intense and increasing competition from satellite and cable television providers
as well as new competitors, including telephone companies. Many of our competitors offer
video services bundled with 2-way high-speed Internet access and telephone services that
consumers may find attractive and which are likely to further increase competition. We
also expect to face increasing competition from content and other providers who distribute
video services directly to consumers over the Internet. The competitive environment may
require us to increase promotional and retention spending or accept lower subscriber
acquisitions and higher subscriber churn. |
|
|
|
|
As technology changes, and in order to remain competitive, we may have to upgrade or
replace some or all subscriber equipment and make substantial investments in our
infrastructure. For example, the increase in demand for high definition (HD) programming
requires not only upgrades to customer premises equipment but also substantial increases in
satellite capacity. We may not be able to pass on to our customers the entire cost of
these upgrades and investments, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to
effectively compete with the HD programming offerings of our competitors. |
|
|
|
|
DISH Network® gross subscriber additions may continue to decrease and subscriber
turnover may continue to increase, in each case due to a variety of factors, such as
increasing competition and worsening economic conditions, which are outside of our control,
and other factors, such as our own operational inefficiencies and levels of customer
satisfaction with our products and services, which are within our control, that would
require significant investments and expenditures to overcome, which may have a material
adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. |
|
|
|
|
Our ability to grow or maintain our business may be adversely affected by weakening
global or domestic economic conditions, wavering consumer confidence, unemployment, tight
credit markets, declines in global and domestic stock markets, falling home prices and
other factors adversely affecting the global and domestic economy. Unfavorable events in
the economy, including a further deterioration in the credit and equity markets, could
significantly affect consumer demand for our pay-TV services as consumers may delay
purchasing decisions or reduce or reallocate their discretionary spending. Adverse
economic conditions may also make it more difficult for us to access financing on
acceptable terms or at all, cause us to impair our investment portfolio, and affect our
ability to attract and retain subscribers. |
|
|
|
|
We rely on EchoStar Corporation (EchoStar), which we owned prior to its January 1,
2008 separation from us (the Spin-off), to design and develop set-top boxes and to
provide transponder capacity, digital broadcast operations and other services for us.
EchoStar is our sole supplier of digital set-top boxes and digital broadcast operations.
Equipment, transponder leasing and digital broadcast operation costs may increase beyond
our current expectations. We may be unable to renew agreements for these services with
EchoStar on acceptable terms or at all. EchoStars inability to develop and produce, or
our inability to obtain, equipment with the latest technology, or our inability to obtain
transponder capacity and digital broadcast operations and other services from third
parties, could affect our subscriber acquisition and churn and cause related revenue to
decline. |
|
|
|
|
The loss of our distribution relationship with AT&T on January 31, 2009 may impair our
ability to generate gross and net subscriber additions, increase churn and impair our
ability to generate revenue growth. |
|
|
|
|
We have made and we will continue to make material investments in staffing, training,
information systems, and other initiatives, primarily in our call center and in-home
service businesses. These |
i
|
|
|
investments are intended to help combat inefficiencies
introduced by the increasing complexity of our business and technology, improve customer
satisfaction, reduce churn, increase productivity, and allow us to scale better over the
long run. We cannot, however, be certain that our increased spending will ultimately be
successful in yielding such returns. In the meantime, we may continue to incur higher
costs as a result of both our operational inefficiencies and increased spending. |
|
|
|
|
Satellite programming signals are subject to theft and we are subject to other forms of
fraud. Theft of service and other forms of fraud could increase in the future, causing us
to lose subscribers and revenue and to incur higher costs. |
|
|
|
|
We depend on certain telecommunications providers, independent retailers and others to
solicit orders for DISH Network services that represent a significant percentage of our
total gross subscriber acquisitions. A number of these resellers are not exclusive to us
and also offer competitors products and services. Loss of one or more of these
relationships could have an adverse effect on our subscriber base and certain of our other
key operating metrics because we may not be able to develop comparable alternative
distribution channels. |
|
|
|
|
We depend on others to produce the programming we distribute to our subscribers,
programming costs may increase beyond our current expectations and we may be unable to
obtain or renew programming agreements on acceptable terms or at all. Existing programming
agreements could be subject to cancellation. We may be denied access to sports and other
programming. Foreign programming is increasingly offered on other platforms. We may also
be unable to obtain required retransmission consents. Our inability to obtain or renew
attractive programming could cause our subscriber base and related revenue to decline and
could cause our subscriber turnover to increase. |
|
|
|
|
We depend on and are subject to government regulations and requirements, primarily those
of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Government regulations and requirements
could become more burdensome at any time, causing us to expend additional resources on
compliance, and critical protections provided for by FCC rules and regulations to ensure
non-discriminatory access to cable-owned programming assets may be reduced. In addition,
we may lose (or have altered) existing or future government authorizations and licenses
that are necessary to conduct our business. We may be unable to obtain needed FCC
authorizations or export licenses. |
|
|
|
|
We made a substantial deposit for 700 MHz wireless licenses in an FCC auction. We will
be required to make significant additional investments or partner with others to
commercialize these licenses and satisfy FCC build-out requirements. |
|
|
|
|
We are highly leveraged and subject to numerous constraints on our ability to raise
additional debt. We may be required to raise and/or refinance indebtedness during
unfavorable market conditions. Recent developments in the financial markets have made it
more difficult for issuers of high yield indebtedness such as us to access capital markets
at reasonable rates. We cannot predict with any certainty whether or not we will be
impacted in the future by the current conditions, which may adversely affect our ability to
refinance our indebtedness, or to secure additional financing to support our growth
initiatives. |
|
|
|
|
A portion of our investment portfolio is invested in asset backed securities, auction
rate securities, mortgage backed securities and special investment vehicles. The markets
associated with these investments have experienced greatly reduced liquidity in recent
months and therefore have adversely affected our liquidity. In
addition, certain of these securities have defaulted or been materially downgraded causing us to record impairment charges. Should the credit ratings of
these securities deteriorate further, we may be required to record additional impairment
charges. |
|
|
|
|
If we and EchoStar are unsuccessful in defending against Tivos motion for contempt or
any subsequent claims that EchoStars technology infringes Tivos patent, we could be
prohibited from distributing DVRs supplied to us by EchoStar, or be required to modify or
eliminate certain user-friendly DVR features that we currently offer to consumers. In that
event we would be at a significant disadvantage to our competitors who could offer this
functionality and, while we would attempt to provide that functionality using different
technology and/or manufacturers other than EchoStar, the adverse affect on our business
could be material. We could also have to pay substantial additional damages. |
|
|
|
|
If our EchoStar X satellite experiences a significant failure, we could lose the ability
to deliver local network channels in many markets. If any of our other owned or leased
satellites experienced a significant failure, we could lose the ability to provide other
critical programming to the continental United States. |
ii
|
|
|
Our satellite launches may be delayed or fail, or our owned or leased satellites may
fail in orbit prior to the end of their scheduled lives which could cause extended
interruptions of some of the channels we offer and impair our ability to attract and retain
subscribers. |
|
|
|
|
We do not carry insurance for any satellite launches or any of the in-orbit satellites
that we own or lease, and we bear the risk of any launch or in-orbit satellite failures.
Therefore, launch failures and/or failures of
any of the in-orbit satellites that we own or lease could have a material adverse effect on
our results of operations and financial position and could require us to take substantial
impairment charges. |
|
|
|
|
Service interruptions arising from technical anomalies on satellites or on-ground
components of our direct broadcast satellite system, or caused by war, terrorist activities
or natural disasters, may cause customer cancellations or otherwise harm our business. |
|
|
|
|
We depend heavily on complex information technologies. Weaknesses in our information
technology systems could have an adverse impact on our business. We may have difficulty
attracting and retaining qualified personnel to maintain our information technology
infrastructure. |
|
|
|
|
We may face actual or perceived conflicts of interest with EchoStar in a number of areas
relating to our past, ongoing and future relationships, including: (i) cross officerships,
directorships and stock ownership, (ii) related party transactions, including those that
were entered into in connection with the Spin-off, and (iii) business opportunities. |
|
|
|
|
We rely on key personnel including Charles W. Ergen, our chairman and chief executive
officer, and other executives, certain of whom will for some period also have
responsibilities with EchoStar through their positions at EchoStar or our management
services agreement with EchoStar. |
|
|
|
|
We are party to various lawsuits which, if adversely decided, could have a significant
adverse impact on our business. |
|
|
|
|
We may be subject to claims that we infringe certain patents. There can be no assurance
that we will be able to obtain licenses or redesign our products to avoid patent
infringement. |
|
|
|
|
We may pursue acquisitions, business combinations, strategic partnerships, divestitures
and other significant transactions that may require us to raise additional capital, (which
may not be available on acceptable terms), could become substantial over time, involve a
high degree of risk, and could expose us to significant financial losses if the underlying
ventures are not successful. |
|
|
|
|
We periodically evaluate and test our internal control over financial reporting in order
to satisfy the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Although our
management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of
December 31, 2007, and while no change in our internal control over financial reporting
occurred during our most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting, if
in the future we are unable to report that our internal control over financial reporting is
effective (or if our auditors do not agree with our assessment of the effectiveness of, or
are unable to express an opinion on, our internal control over financial reporting), we
could lose investor confidence in our financial reports, which could have a material
adverse effect on our stock price and our business. |
|
|
|
|
We may face other risks described from time to time in periodic and current reports we
file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). |
All cautionary statements made herein should be read as being applicable to all forward-looking
statements wherever they appear. In this connection, investors should consider the risks described
herein and should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. We assume no
responsibility for updating forward-looking information contained or incorporated by reference
herein or in other reports we file with the SEC.
In this report, the words DISH Network, the Company, we, our and us refer to DISH Network
Corporation and its subsidiaries, unless the context otherwise requires. EchoStar refers to
EchoStar Corporation and its subsidiaries.
iii
Item 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in thousands, except share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
971,943 |
|
|
$ |
919,543 |
|
Marketable investment securities |
|
|
460,704 |
|
|
|
1,868,653 |
|
Restricted cash and cash equivalents (Note 5) |
|
|
104,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts receivable other, net of allowance for uncollectible accounts of $14,708 and $14,019, respectively |
|
|
720,745 |
|
|
|
699,101 |
|
Trade accounts receivable EchoStar |
|
|
72,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
394,659 |
|
|
|
306,915 |
|
Current deferred tax assets |
|
|
15,179 |
|
|
|
342,813 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
113,139 |
|
|
|
108,113 |
|
Other current assets EchoStar |
|
|
3,707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
2,856,836 |
|
|
|
4,245,138 |
|
Restricted cash and marketable investment securities |
|
|
75,739 |
|
|
|
172,520 |
|
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $2,366,559 and $3,591,594, respectively |
|
|
2,622,830 |
|
|
|
4,058,189 |
|
FCC authorizations |
|
|
679,570 |
|
|
|
845,564 |
|
700 MHz wireless spectrum deposit (Note 7) |
|
|
711,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
14,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
5,426 |
|
|
|
218,875 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
256,917 |
|
Marketable investment securities |
|
|
100,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other noncurrent assets, net (Note 5) |
|
|
110,376 |
|
|
|
289,326 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
7,177,248 |
|
|
$ |
10,086,529 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity (Deficit) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts payable other |
|
$ |
97,406 |
|
|
$ |
314,825 |
|
Trade accounts payable EchoStar |
|
|
491,886 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred revenue and other |
|
|
849,262 |
|
|
|
857,846 |
|
Accrued programming |
|
|
906,329 |
|
|
|
914,074 |
|
Litigation accrual |
|
|
104,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other accrued expenses |
|
|
717,257 |
|
|
|
587,942 |
|
Current portion of capital lease obligations, mortgages and other notes payable |
|
|
11,739 |
|
|
|
50,454 |
|
3% Convertible Subordinated Note due 2011 (Note 8) |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
3% Convertible Subordinated Note due 2010 (Note 8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
5 3/4% Senior Notes due 2008 (Note 8) |
|
|
971,555 |
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
4,175,034 |
|
|
|
4,225,141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term obligations, net of current portion: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 3/8% Senior Notes due 2011 |
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
3% Convertible Subordinated Note due 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
6 5/8% Senior Notes due 2014 |
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
7 1/8% Senior Notes due 2016 |
|
|
1,500,000 |
|
|
|
1,500,000 |
|
7% Senior Notes due 2013 |
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
7 3/4% Senior Notes due 2015 (Note 8) |
|
|
750,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease obligations, mortgages and other notes payable, net of current portion |
|
|
222,794 |
|
|
|
550,250 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
386,493 |
|
Long-term deferred revenue, distribution and carriage payments and other long-term liabilities |
|
|
158,918 |
|
|
|
259,656 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term obligations, net of current portion |
|
|
5,131,712 |
|
|
|
5,221,399 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
9,306,746 |
|
|
|
9,446,540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 11) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity (Deficit): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A common stock, $.01 par value, 1,600,000,000 shares authorized, 256,689,257
and 255,138,160 shares issued, 208,622,342 and 210,125,360 shares outstanding, respectively |
|
|
2,567 |
|
|
|
2,551 |
|
Class B common stock, $.01 par value, 800,000,000 shares authorized,
238,435,208 shares issued and outstanding. |
|
|
2,384 |
|
|
|
2,384 |
|
Class C common stock, $.01 par value, 800,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
2,085,343 |
|
|
|
2,033,865 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
(91,445 |
) |
|
|
46,698 |
|
Accumulated earnings (deficit) |
|
|
(2,685,388 |
) |
|
|
(84,456 |
) |
Treasury stock, at cost |
|
|
(1,442,959 |
) |
|
|
(1,361,053 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity (deficit) |
|
|
(2,129,498 |
) |
|
|
639,989 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity (deficit) |
|
$ |
7,177,248 |
|
|
$ |
10,086,529 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
1
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in thousands, except share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
For the Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subscriber-related revenue |
|
$ |
2,886,157 |
|
|
$ |
2,699,018 |
|
|
$ |
8,572,163 |
|
|
$ |
7,927,311 |
|
Equipment sales and other revenue |
|
|
41,918 |
|
|
|
95,309 |
|
|
|
95,755 |
|
|
|
272,009 |
|
Equipment sales EchoStar |
|
|
2,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,533 |
|
|
|
|
|
Transitional services and other revenue EchoStar |
|
|
6,273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,714 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
2,936,781 |
|
|
|
2,794,327 |
|
|
|
8,696,165 |
|
|
|
8,199,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subscriber-related expenses (exclusive of depreciation shown below Note 12) |
|
|
1,534,133 |
|
|
|
1,384,632 |
|
|
|
4,402,771 |
|
|
|
4,067,518 |
|
Satellite and transmission expenses (exclusive of depreciation shown below Note 12): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EchoStar |
|
|
76,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
232,798 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
7,651 |
|
|
|
50,253 |
|
|
|
22,890 |
|
|
|
125,931 |
|
Equipment, transitional services and other cost of sales |
|
|
69,315 |
|
|
|
66,745 |
|
|
|
131,488 |
|
|
|
189,576 |
|
Subscriber acquisition costs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales subscriber promotion subsidies EchoStar
(exclusive of depreciation shown below Note 12) |
|
|
53,418 |
|
|
|
25,553 |
|
|
|
116,489 |
|
|
|
89,082 |
|
Other subscriber promotion subsidies |
|
|
310,879 |
|
|
|
314,550 |
|
|
|
888,849 |
|
|
|
931,514 |
|
Subscriber acquisition advertising |
|
|
73,469 |
|
|
|
60,521 |
|
|
|
178,800 |
|
|
|
157,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total subscriber acquisition costs |
|
|
437,766 |
|
|
|
400,624 |
|
|
|
1,184,138 |
|
|
|
1,178,117 |
|
General and administrative EchoStar |
|
|
14,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,740 |
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative |
|
|
133,282 |
|
|
|
151,409 |
|
|
|
371,364 |
|
|
|
451,611 |
|
Depreciation and amortization (Note 12) |
|
|
245,646 |
|
|
|
344,150 |
|
|
|
766,260 |
|
|
|
1,008,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
2,518,941 |
|
|
|
2,397,813 |
|
|
|
7,152,449 |
|
|
|
7,020,954 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
417,840 |
|
|
|
396,514 |
|
|
|
1,543,716 |
|
|
|
1,178,366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income (Expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
16,609 |
|
|
|
37,074 |
|
|
|
44,082 |
|
|
|
98,917 |
|
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized |
|
|
(101,802 |
) |
|
|
(96,251 |
) |
|
|
(284,845 |
) |
|
|
(312,413 |
) |
Other (Note 5) |
|
|
(106,055 |
) |
|
|
(6,124 |
) |
|
|
(124,583 |
) |
|
|
(24,099 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense) |
|
|
(191,248 |
) |
|
|
(65,301 |
) |
|
|
(365,346 |
) |
|
|
(237,595 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
226,592 |
|
|
|
331,213 |
|
|
|
1,178,370 |
|
|
|
940,771 |
|
Income tax (provision) benefit, net |
|
|
(134,697 |
) |
|
|
(131,533 |
) |
|
|
(492,007 |
) |
|
|
(359,752 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
91,895 |
|
|
$ |
199,680 |
|
|
$ |
686,363 |
|
|
$ |
581,019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic and diluted net income (loss) per share Class A and B common stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic net income (loss) per share weighted-average common shares outstanding |
|
|
449,425 |
|
|
|
447,496 |
|
|
|
449,318 |
|
|
|
447,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for diluted net income (loss) per share weighted-average common shares outstanding |
|
|
460,042 |
|
|
|
456,543 |
|
|
|
461,040 |
|
|
|
456,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share Class A and B common stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income (loss) |
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
$ |
1.53 |
|
|
$ |
1.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income (loss) |
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
$ |
1.50 |
|
|
$ |
1.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
2
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Cash Flows From Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
686,363 |
|
|
$ |
581,019 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
766,260 |
|
|
|
1,008,201 |
|
Equity in losses (earnings) of affiliates |
|
|
1,884 |
|
|
|
3,165 |
|
Realized and unrealized losses (gains) on investments |
|
|
120,669 |
|
|
|
16,309 |
|
Non-cash, stock-based compensation |
|
|
11,690 |
|
|
|
16,555 |
|
Deferred tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
151,638 |
|
|
|
293,756 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
5,878 |
|
|
|
5,320 |
|
Change in noncurrent assets |
|
|
8,470 |
|
|
|
(5,253 |
) |
Change in long-term deferred revenue, distribution and carriage payments and other long-term liabilities |
|
|
31,010 |
|
|
|
(15,549 |
) |
Changes in current assets and current liabilities, net |
|
|
41,525 |
|
|
|
(6,868 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
1,825,387 |
|
|
|
1,896,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of marketable investment securities |
|
|
(4,344,319 |
) |
|
|
(2,640,785 |
) |
Sales and maturities of marketable investment securities |
|
|
4,457,908 |
|
|
|
2,413,757 |
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(844,265 |
) |
|
|
(1,070,033 |
) |
Change in restricted cash and marketable investment securities |
|
|
1,700 |
|
|
|
2,269 |
|
Deposit for 700 MHz wireless spectrum acquisition |
|
|
(711,871 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the sale of strategic investment |
|
|
106,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
FCC authorizations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(57,463 |
) |
Purchase of strategic investments included in noncurrent assets and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(71,906 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(705 |
) |
|
|
5,803 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
(1,335,352 |
) |
|
|
(1,418,358 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution of cash and cash equivalents to EchoStar in connection with the Spin-off (Note 1) |
|
|
(585,147 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of 7 3/4% Senior Notes due 2015 (Note 8) |
|
|
750,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Debt issuance costs |
|
|
(4,972 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Redemption of 5 3/4% Convertible Subordinated Notes due 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(999,985 |
) |
Redemption of 3% Convertible Subordinated Note due 2010 |
|
|
(500,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Repurchases of 5 3/4% Senior Notes due 2008 |
|
|
(28,445 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Repayment of capital lease obligations, mortgages and other notes payable |
|
|
(7,068 |
) |
|
|
(31,835 |
) |
Repurchases of Class A common stock (Note 9) |
|
|
(81,906 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from Class A common stock options exercised and Class A common stock issued
under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan |
|
|
19,903 |
|
|
|
28,082 |
|
Excess tax benefits recognized on stock option exercises |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,407 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
(437,635 |
) |
|
|
(999,331 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
52,400 |
|
|
|
(521,034 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
919,543 |
|
|
|
1,749,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
971,943 |
|
|
$ |
1,228,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest |
|
$ |
240,437 |
|
|
$ |
273,877 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalized interest |
|
$ |
11,812 |
|
|
$ |
11,965 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash received for interest |
|
$ |
36,354 |
|
|
$ |
73,146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes |
|
$ |
361,737 |
|
|
$ |
72,861 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee benefits paid in Class A common stock |
|
$ |
19,374 |
|
|
$ |
17,674 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Satellite financed under capital lease obligations |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
198,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Satellite and other vendor financing |
|
$ |
23,314 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets contributed in connection with the Spin-off, excluding cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
2,741,399 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1. Organization and Business Activities
Principal Business
DISH Network Corporation, formerly known as EchoStar Communications Corporation, is a holding
company. Its subsidiaries (which together with DISH Network Corporation are referred to as DISH
Network, the Company, we, us and/or our) operate the DISH Network® television service,
which provides a direct broadcast satellite (DBS) subscription television service in the United
States and had 13.780 million subscribers as of September 30, 2008.
We have deployed substantial resources to develop the DISH Network DBS System. The DISH Network
DBS System consists of our licensed Federal Communications Commission (FCC) authorized DBS and
Fixed Satellite Service (FSS) spectrum, our owned and leased satellites, receiver systems,
digital broadcast operations, customer service facilities, in-home service and call center
operations and certain other assets utilized in our operations. Our principal business strategy is
to continue developing our subscription television service in the United States to provide
consumers with a fully-competitive alternative to others in the multi-channel video programming
distribution (MVPD) industry.
Spin-off of EchoStar Corporation and Technology and Certain Infrastructure Assets
On January 1, 2008, we completed a tax-free distribution of our technology and set-top box business
and certain infrastructure assets (the Spin-off) into a separate publicly-traded company,
EchoStar Corporation (EchoStar). DISH Network and EchoStar now operate separately, and neither
entity has any ownership interest in the other. However, a substantial majority of the voting
power of the shares of both companies is owned beneficially by Charles W. Ergen, our Chief
Executive Officer and Chairman of our board of directors. The two entities consist of the
following:
|
|
|
DISH Network Corporation which retained its subscription television business, the
DISH Network®, and |
|
|
|
|
EchoStar Corporation which sells equipment, including set-top boxes and related
components, to DISH Network and international customers, and provides digital broadcast
operations and satellite services to DISH Network and other customers. |
The Spin-off of EchoStar did not result in the discontinuance of any of our ongoing operations as
the cash flows related to, among others things, purchases of set-top boxes, transponder leasing and
digital broadcasting services that we purchase from EchoStar continue to be included in our
operations.
Our shareholders of record on December 27, 2007 received one share of EchoStar common stock for
every five shares of each class of DISH Network common stock they held as of the record date.
4
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
The table below summarizes the assets and liabilities that were distributed to EchoStar in
connection with the Spin-off. The distribution was accounted for at historical cost given the
nature of the distribution.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
585,147 |
|
Marketable investment securities |
|
|
947,120 |
|
Trade accounts receivable, net |
|
|
38,054 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
31,000 |
|
Current deferred tax assets |
|
|
8,459 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
32,351 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
1,642,131 |
|
Restricted cash and marketable investment securities |
|
|
3,150 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
1,516,604 |
|
FCC authorizations |
|
|
165,994 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
214,544 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
256,917 |
|
Other noncurrent assets, net |
|
|
93,707 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
3,893,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts payable |
|
$ |
5,825 |
|
Deferred revenue and other accrued expenses |
|
|
38,460 |
|
Current portion of capital lease obligations, mortgages and other notes payable |
|
|
40,533 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
84,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term obligations, net of current portion: |
|
|
|
|
Capital lease obligations, mortgages and other notes payable, net of current portion |
|
|
341,886 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
139,797 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term obligations, net of current portion |
|
|
481,683 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
566,501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets distributed |
|
$ |
3,326,546 |
|
|
|
|
|
2. Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared
in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP)
and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X for interim financial
information. Accordingly, these statements do not include all of the information and notes
required for complete financial statements prepared under GAAP. In our opinion, all
adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair
presentation have been included. Operating results for the nine months ended September
30, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year
ending December 31, 2008. For further information, refer to the Consolidated Financial
Statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year
ended December 31, 2007 (2007 10-K/A). Certain prior period amounts have
been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. Variable rate demand
notes (VRDNs), which we previously reported as cash and cash equivalents,
are now classified as current marketable investment securities (see Note 5). We held
VRDNs on December 31, 2007 prior to the Spin-off, we distributed VRDNs to EchoStar in
connection with the Spin-off, and we continued to hold VRDNs as of September 30, 2008.
We reclassified the allocation of cash and cash equivalents and marketable investment
securities to accurately reflect the amounts of each we distributed to EchoStar in
connection with the Spin-off. There was no change in the combined distribution total
of $1.5 billion of cash and cash equivalents and current marketable investment securities
(see Note 1). As a result of these reclassifications, Purchases of marketable investment
securities and Sales and maturities of marketable investment securities
in Net cash flows from investing activities and Distribution of
cash and cash equivalents to EchoStar in connection with the Spin-off in Net
cash flows from financing activities on our Condensed Consolidated Statements
of Cash Flows have been reclassified for all prior periods. The ongoing purchase and
sale of VRDNs now appear on our cash flow statement under Cash flows from investing
activities.
5
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
Principles of Consolidation
We consolidate all majority owned subsidiaries and investments in entities in which we have
controlling influence. Non-majority owned investments are accounted for using the equity method
when we have the ability to significantly influence the operating decisions of the investee. When
we do not have the ability to significantly influence the operating decisions of an investee, the
cost method is used. For entities that are considered variable interest entities we apply the
provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 46R, Consolidation
of Variable Interest Entities An Interpretation of ARB No. 51 (FIN 46R). All significant
intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses for each reporting period. Estimates are used in accounting for, among other things,
allowances for uncollectible accounts, inventory allowances, self-insurance obligations, deferred
taxes and related valuation allowances, uncertain tax positions, loss contingencies, fair values of
financial instruments, fair value of options granted under our stock-based compensation plans, fair
value of assets and liabilities acquired in business combinations, capital leases, asset
impairments, useful lives of property, equipment and intangible assets, retailer commissions,
programming expenses, subscriber lives and royalty obligations. Actual results may differ from
previously estimated amounts, and such differences may be material to the Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements. Estimates and assumptions are reviewed periodically, and the effects of
revisions are reflected prospectively in the period they occur.
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
The components of comprehensive income (loss) are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
For the Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
91,895 |
|
|
$ |
199,680 |
|
|
$ |
686,363 |
|
|
$ |
581,019 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
(1,384 |
) |
|
|
3,652 |
|
|
|
(2,961 |
) |
|
|
6,268 |
|
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities |
|
|
(170,447 |
) |
|
|
38,103 |
|
|
|
(231,869 |
) |
|
|
44,184 |
|
Recognition of previously unrealized (gains) losses on
available-for-sale securities included in net income (loss) |
|
|
148,423 |
|
|
|
(268 |
) |
|
|
146,112 |
|
|
|
(2,263 |
) |
Deferred income tax (expense) benefit |
|
|
(29,398 |
) |
|
|
(14,950 |
) |
|
|
(10,174 |
) |
|
|
(16,415 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
39,089 |
|
|
$ |
226,217 |
|
|
$ |
587,471 |
|
|
$ |
612,793 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) presented on the accompanying Condensed
Consolidated Balance
6
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
Sheets and below consists of the accumulated net unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale
securities and foreign currency translation adjustments, net of deferred taxes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
Income |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Balance, December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
46,698 |
|
Distribution of accumulated other comprehensive income to EchoStar, net of tax (Note 1) |
|
|
(39,251 |
) |
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
(2,961 |
) |
Change in unrealized holding gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities, net |
|
|
(85,757 |
) |
Deferred income tax (expense) benefit |
|
|
(10,174 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance, September 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
(91,445 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Basic and Diluted Income (Loss) Per Share
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, Earnings Per Share (SFAS 128) requires
entities to present both basic earnings per share (EPS) and diluted EPS. Basic EPS excludes
dilution and is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted-average number of common
shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if
stock options were exercised and convertible securities were converted to common stock.
The potential dilution from our subordinated notes convertible into common stock was computed using
the if converted method. The potential dilution from stock options exercisable into common stock
was computed using the treasury stock method based on the average market value of our Class A
common stock. The following table reflects the basic and diluted weighted-average shares
outstanding used to calculate basic and diluted earnings per share. Earnings per share amounts for
all periods are presented below in accordance with the requirements of SFAS 128.
7
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
For the Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator for basic net income (loss) per share Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
91,895 |
|
|
$ |
199,680 |
|
|
$ |
686,363 |
|
|
$ |
581,019 |
|
Interest on subordinated notes convertible into
common shares, net of related tax effect |
|
|
1,537 |
|
|
|
2,432 |
|
|
|
6,494 |
|
|
|
7,295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator for diluted net income (loss) per common share |
|
$ |
93,432 |
|
|
$ |
202,112 |
|
|
$ |
692,857 |
|
|
$ |
588,314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic net income (loss) per common share
weighted-average common shares outstanding |
|
|
449,425 |
|
|
|
447,496 |
|
|
|
449,318 |
|
|
|
447,001 |
|
Dilutive impact of options outstanding |
|
|
2,318 |
|
|
|
1,782 |
|
|
|
2,941 |
|
|
|
1,782 |
|
Dilutive impact of subordinated notes convertible into common shares |
|
|
8,299 |
|
|
|
7,265 |
|
|
|
8,781 |
|
|
|
7,265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for diluted net income (loss) per share
weighted-average diluted common shares outstanding |
|
|
460,042 |
|
|
|
456,543 |
|
|
|
461,040 |
|
|
|
456,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share Class A and B common stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income (loss) |
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
$ |
1.53 |
|
|
$ |
1.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income (loss) |
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
$ |
1.50 |
|
|
$ |
1.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of Class A common stock issuable upon conversion of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3% Convertible Subordinated Note due 2010 (Note 8) * |
|
|
8,299 |
|
|
|
6,866 |
|
|
|
8,299 |
|
|
|
6,866 |
|
3% Convertible Subordinated Note due 2011 (Note 8) |
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
399 |
|
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
399 |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
The 3% Convertible Subordinated Note due 2010 was repurchased in September 2008. |
As of September 30, 2008 and 2007, there were 3.4 million and 1.4 million stock incentive awards
outstanding, respectively, not included in the above denominator as their inclusion would have been
antidilutive. Vesting of options and rights to acquire shares of our Class A common stock granted
pursuant to our long-term incentive plans is contingent upon meeting certain long-term goals which
have not yet been achieved. As a consequence, the following are not included in the diluted EPS
calculation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
(In thousands) |
Performance-based options |
|
|
9,548 |
|
|
|
10,200 |
|
Restricted performance units |
|
|
571 |
|
|
|
639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
10,119 |
|
|
|
10,839 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition, the foregoing diluted EPS calculation does not include approximately 0.3 million
shares of Class A common stock, the vesting of which is subject to our achievement of a certain
long-term subscriber goal, which has not yet been achieved.
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
We adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48) on January 1, 2007. FIN 48
clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprises financial
statements in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, Accounting for
Income Taxes, and prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement process for financial
statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to
8
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest
and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition.
In addition to filing federal income tax returns, we and our subsidiaries file income tax returns
in all states that impose an income tax and in a small number of foreign jurisdictions where we
have insignificant operations. We are subject to U.S. federal, state and local income tax
examinations by tax authorities for the years beginning in 1996 due to the carryover of previously
incurred net operating losses. As of September 30, 2008, no taxing authority has proposed any
significant adjustments to our tax positions. We have no significant current tax examinations in
process.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of January 1, 2008 |
|
$ |
20,160 |
|
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year |
|
|
47,707 |
|
Reductions based on tax positions related to the current year |
|
|
(36,712 |
) |
Additions for tax positions of prior years |
|
|
106,098 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
137,253 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest and penalties on uncertain tax positions are recorded as a component of Other
income (expense) on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. During the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2008, we recorded $1 million and $6 million in interest and penalty
expense to earnings, respectively. Accrued interest and penalties was $8 million at September 30,
2008.
We have $128 million in unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, could favorably affect our
effective tax rate. Of this amount, it is reasonably possible that $103 million may be paid or
effectively settled within the next twelve months, depending on the resolution of a change in
accounting method filed with the Internal Revenue Service.
New Accounting Pronouncements
Revised Business Combinations
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141R (revised
2007), Business Combinations (SFAS 141R). SFAS 141R replaces SFAS 141 and establishes
principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements
the identifiable assets acquired, including goodwill, the liabilities assumed and any
non-controlling interest in the acquiree. SFAS 141R also establishes disclosure requirements to
enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the
business combination. This statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2008. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS 141R to have a material impact on our financial
position or results of operations.
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements (SFAS 160). SFAS 160 establishes
accounting and reporting standards for ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other
than the parent, the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the
noncontrolling interest, changes in a parents ownership interest and the valuation of retained
noncontrolling equity investments when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. SFAS 160 also establishes
reporting requirements for providing sufficient disclosures that clearly identify and distinguish
between the interests of the parent and the interests of the noncontrolling owners. This standard
is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. We do not expect the adoption of
SFAS 160 to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
9
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
3. Stock-Based Compensation
Stock Incentive Plans
In connection with the Spin-off, as provided in our existing stock incentive plans and consistent
with the Spin-off exchange ratio, each DISH Network stock option was converted into two options as
follows:
|
|
|
an adjusted DISH Network stock option for the same number of shares that were
exercisable under the original DISH Network stock option, with an exercise price
equal to the exercise price of the original DISH Network stock option multiplied by
0.831219. |
|
|
|
|
a new EchoStar stock option for one-fifth of the number of shares that were
exercisable under the original DISH Network stock option, with an exercise price
equal to the exercise price of the original DISH Network stock option multiplied by
0.843907. |
Similarly, each holder of DISH Network restricted stock units retained his or her DISH Network
restricted stock units and received one EchoStar restricted stock unit for every five DISH Network
restricted stock units that they held.
Consequently, the fair value of the DISH Network stock award and the new EchoStar stock award
immediately following the Spin-off was equivalent to the fair value of such stock award immediately
prior to the Spin-off.
We maintain stock incentive plans to attract and retain officers, directors and key employees.
Awards under these plans include both performance and non-performance based equity incentives. As
of September 30, 2008, we had outstanding under these plans options to acquire 20.4 million shares
of our Class A common stock and 1.6 million restricted stock awards. Stock options granted through
September 30, 2008 were granted with exercise prices equal to or greater than the market value of
our Class A common stock at the date of grant and with a maximum term of ten years. While
historically we have issued options subject to vesting, typically at the rate of 20% per year, some
options have been granted with immediate vesting and other options vest only upon the achievement
of certain company-wide objectives. As of September 30, 2008, we had 64.3 million shares of our
Class A common stock available for future grant under our stock incentive plans.
As of September 30, 2008, the following stock incentive awards were outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2008 |
|
|
Dish Network Awards |
|
EchoStar Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted |
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted |
|
|
Stock |
|
Stock |
|
Stock |
|
Stock |
Stock Incentive Awards Outstanding |
|
Options |
|
Units |
|
Options |
|
Units |
Held by DISH Network employees |
|
|
14,847,200 |
|
|
|
452,495 |
|
|
|
3,199,525 |
|
|
|
90,481 |
|
Held by EchoStar employees |
|
|
5,530,638 |
|
|
|
1,188,332 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
20,377,838 |
|
|
|
1,640,827 |
|
|
|
3,199,525 |
|
|
|
90,481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We are responsible for fulfilling all stock incentive awards related to DISH Network common stock
and EchoStar is responsible for fulfilling all stock incentive awards related to EchoStar common
stock, regardless of whether such stock incentive awards are held by our or EchoStars employees.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, based on the requirements of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 123R, Share-Based Payments (SFAS 123R), our stock-based compensation expense,
resulting from awards outstanding at the Spin-off date, is based on the stock incentive awards held
by our employees regardless of whether such awards were issued by DISH Network or
EchoStar. Accordingly, stock-based compensation that we expense with respect to EchoStar stock
incentive awards is included in Additional paid-in capital on our Condensed Consolidated Balance
Sheets.
10
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
Stock Award Activity
Our stock option activity (including performance and non-performance based options) for the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months |
|
|
Ended September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Options |
|
Exercise Price |
Total options outstanding, beginning of period |
|
|
20,938,403 |
|
|
$ |
22.61 |
|
Granted |
|
|
1,188,500 |
|
|
|
28.46 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(844,278 |
) |
|
|
21.76 |
|
Forfeited and cancelled |
|
|
(904,787 |
) |
|
|
27.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total options outstanding, end of period |
|
|
20,377,838 |
|
|
|
22.79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance based options outstanding, end of period * |
|
|
9,547,500 |
|
|
|
16.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at end of period |
|
|
6,576,564 |
|
|
|
28.79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
These options, which are included in the caption Total options outstanding, end of period,
were issued pursuant to two separate long-term, performance-based stock incentive plans, which are
discussed below. Vesting of these options is contingent upon meeting certain long-term goals which
management has determined are not probable as of September 30, 2008. |
We realized $3 million and $9 million of tax benefits from stock options exercised during the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Based on the closing market price of our
Class A common stock on September 30, 2008, the aggregate intrinsic value of our outstanding stock
options was $76 million. Of that amount, options with an aggregate intrinsic value of $5 million
were exercisable at the end of the period.
Our restricted stock award activity (including performance and non-performance based options) for
the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months |
|
|
Ended September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
Restricted |
|
Average |
|
|
Stock |
|
Grant Date |
|
|
Awards |
|
Fair Value |
Total restricted stock awards outstanding, beginning of period |
|
|
1,717,078 |
|
|
$ |
29.24 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(30,000 |
) |
|
|
26.66 |
|
Forfeited and cancelled |
|
|
(46,251 |
) |
|
|
30.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total restricted stock awards outstanding, end of period |
|
|
1,640,827 |
|
|
|
29.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted performance units outstanding, end of period * |
|
|
570,827 |
|
|
|
25.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
These restricted performance units, which are included in the caption Total restricted stock
awards outstanding, end of period, were issued pursuant to a long-term, performance-based stock
incentive plan, which is discussed below. Vesting of these restricted performance units is
contingent upon meeting a long-term goal which management has determined is not probable as of
September 30, 2008. |
11
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
Long-Term Performance-Based Plans
In February 1999, we adopted a long-term, performance-based stock incentive plan (the 1999 LTIP)
within the terms of our 1995 Stock Incentive Plan. The 1999 LTIP provided stock options to key
employees which vest over five years at the rate of 20% per year. Exercise of the options is also
contingent on the Company achieving a company-specific goal in relation to an industry-related
metric prior to December 31, 2008.
In January 2005, we adopted a long-term, performance-based stock incentive plan (the 2005 LTIP)
within the terms of our 1999 Stock Incentive Plan. The 2005 LTIP provides stock options and
restricted performance units, either alone or in combination, which vest over seven years at the
rate of 10% per year during the first four years, and at the rate of 20% per year thereafter.
Exercise of the options is also subject to a performance condition that a company-specific
subscriber goal is achieved prior to March 31, 2015.
Contingent compensation related to the 1999 LTIP and the 2005 LTIP will not be recorded on our
financial statements unless and until management concludes achievement of the performance condition
is probable. Given the competitive nature of our business, small variations in subscriber churn,
gross subscriber addition rates and certain other factors can significantly impact subscriber
growth. Consequently, while it was determined that achievement of either of the goals was not
probable as of September 30, 2008, that assessment could change with respect to either goal at any
time. In accordance with SFAS 123R, if all of the awards under each plan were vested and each goal
had been met during the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we would have recorded total
non-cash, stock-based compensation expense for our employees as indicated in the table below. If
the goals are met and there are unvested options at that time, the vested amounts would be expensed
immediately on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, with the unvested portion
recognized ratably over the remaining vesting period. During the nine months ended September 30,
2008, if we had determined each goal was probable, we would have recorded total non-cash,
stock-based compensation expense for our employees as indicated in the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Vested Portion |
|
|
|
1999 LTIP |
|
|
2005 LTIP |
|
|
1999 LTIP |
|
|
2005 LTIP |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
DISH Network awards held by DISH Network employees |
|
$ |
21,609 |
|
|
$ |
49,873 |
|
|
$ |
19,772 |
|
|
$ |
12,654 |
|
EchoStar awards held by DISH Network employees |
|
|
4,387 |
|
|
|
10,126 |
|
|
|
4,015 |
|
|
|
2,569 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
25,996 |
|
|
$ |
59,999 |
|
|
$ |
23,787 |
|
|
$ |
15,223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of the 20.4 million options and 1.6 million restricted stock awards outstanding under our stock
incentive plans as of September 30, 2008, the following awards were outstanding pursuant to the
1999 LTIP and the 2005 LTIP:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
Long-Term Performance-Based Plans |
|
Stock Awards |
|
Exercise Price |
1999 LTIP options |
|
|
5,098,000 |
|
|
$ |
8.71 |
|
2005 LTIP options |
|
|
4,449,500 |
|
|
|
25.22 |
|
2005 LTIP restricted performance units |
|
|
570,827 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
10,118,327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No awards were granted under the 1999 LTIP or 2005 LTIP during the nine months ended September 30,
2008.
12
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
Stock-Based Compensation
Total non-cash, stock-based compensation expense, net of related tax effects, for all of our
employees is shown in the following table for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008
and 2007 and was allocated to the same expense categories as the base compensation for such
employees:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
For the Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Subscriber-related |
|
$ |
127 |
|
|
$ |
152 |
|
|
$ |
414 |
|
|
$ |
458 |
|
Satellite and transmission |
|
|
|
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
306 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
2,185 |
|
|
|
2,951 |
|
|
|
6,773 |
|
|
|
9,460 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-cash, stock-based
compensation |
|
$ |
2,312 |
|
|
$ |
3,189 |
|
|
$ |
7,187 |
|
|
$ |
10,224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2008, our total unrecognized compensation cost related to our non-performance
based unvested stock options was $31 million and includes compensation expense that we will
recognize for EchoStar stock options held by our employees as a result of the Spin-off. This cost
is based on an estimated future forfeiture rate of approximately 4.4% per year and will be
recognized over a weighted-average period of approximatly three years. Share-based compensation
expense is recognized based on awards ultimately expected to vest and is reduced for estimated
forfeitures. SFAS 123R requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if
necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. Changes in the
estimated forfeiture rate can have a significant effect on share-based compensation expense since
the effect of adjusting the rate is recognized in the period the forfeiture estimate is changed.
The fair value of each award for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 was
estimated at the date of the grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following
assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
For the Nine Months |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
3.15 |
% |
|
|
4.21% 4.49 |
% |
|
|
2.74% 3.42 |
% |
|
|
4.51% 4.77 |
% |
Volatility factor |
|
|
24.90 |
% |
|
|
18.63% 23.95 |
% |
|
|
19.98% 24.90 |
% |
|
|
20.17% 22.29 |
% |
Expected term of options in years |
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
6.0 10.0 |
|
|
|
6.0 6.1 |
|
|
|
5.9 10.0 |
|
Weighted-average fair value of options granted |
|
$ |
6.65 |
|
|
|
$13.70 $21.41 |
|
|
|
$6.65 $8.72 |
|
|
|
$13.56 $20.14 |
|
We do not currently plan to pay additional dividends on our common stock, and therefore the
dividend yield percentage is set at zero for all periods. The Black-Scholes option valuation model
was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options which have no vesting
restrictions and are fully transferable. Consequently, our estimate of fair value may differ from
other valuation models. Further, the Black-Scholes model
requires the input of highly subjective assumptions. Changes in the subjective input assumptions
can materially affect the fair value estimate. Therefore, we do not believe the existing models
provide as reliable a single measure of the fair value of stock-based compensation awards as a
market-based model would.
We will continue to evaluate the assumptions used to derive the estimated fair value of options for
our stock as new events or changes in circumstances become known.
13
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
4. Inventories
Inventories consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Finished goods DBS |
|
$ |
213,627 |
|
|
$ |
170,463 |
|
Raw materials |
|
|
119,994 |
|
|
|
70,103 |
|
Work-in-process used |
|
|
78,771 |
|
|
|
67,542 |
|
Work-in-process new |
|
|
3,784 |
|
|
|
13,546 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
416,176 |
|
|
|
321,654 |
|
Inventory allowance |
|
|
(21,517 |
) |
|
|
(14,739 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories, net |
|
$ |
394,659 |
|
|
$ |
306,915 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Investment Securities
Fair Value Measurements
Effective January 1, 2008, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair
Value Measurements (SFAS 157), for all financial instruments and non-financial instruments
accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis. SFAS 157 establishes a new framework for
measuring fair value and expands related disclosures. Broadly, the SFAS 157 framework requires
fair value to be determined based on the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid
to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset
or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. SFAS 157 establishes market or
observable inputs as the preferred source of values, followed by unobservable inputs or assumptions
based on hypothetical transactions in the absence of market inputs.
|
|
|
Level 1, defined as observable inputs being quoted prices in active markets for
identical assets; |
|
|
|
|
Level 2, defined as observable inputs including quoted prices for similar assets; and |
|
|
|
|
Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists,
therefore requiring assumptions based on the best information available. |
Investments in Debt and Equity Securities
We have investments in various debt and equity instruments including corporate bonds, corporate
equity securities, government bonds, and VRDNs. VRDNs are long-term floating rate municipal bonds
with embedded put options that allow the bondholder to sell the security at par plus accrued
interest. All of the put options are secured by a pledged liquidity source. While they are
classified as marketable investment securities, VRDNs can be liquidated per the put option on a
same day or on a five business day settlement basis. As of September 30, 2008 and December 31,
2007, we held VRDNs with fair values of $113 million and $261 million, respectively.
We also have invested in auction rate securities (ARS) and mortgage backed securities (MBS),
which are classified as available-for-sale securities and reported at fair value. Recent events in
the credit markets have reduced or eliminated current liquidity for certain of our ARS and MBS
investments. The fair values of these securities are estimated utilizing a combination of
comparable instruments and liquidity assumptions. These analyses consider, among other items, the
collateral underlying the investments, credit ratings, and liquidity. These securities were also
compared, when possible, to other observable market data with similar characteristics.
14
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
For our ARS and MBS investments, due to the lack of observable market quotes for identical assets,
we utilize analyses that rely on Level 2 and/or Level 3 inputs. These inputs include observed
prices on similar assets as well as our assumptions and estimates related to the counterparty
credit quality, default risk underlying the security and overall capital market liquidity. The
valuation of our ARS and MBS investments portfolio is subject to uncertainties that are difficult
to estimate.
As of September 30, 2008, $75 million, net of tax, of unrealized losses were included in
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, as
the result of the dislocation in the credit markets and temporary declines in the fair value for
our ARS investments. We have established a full valuation allowance for the deferred tax assets
associated with these capital losses. In addition, we continue to classify these investments
totaling $92 million as noncurrent assets as we intend to hold these investments until they recover
or mature.
As of September 30, 2008, $16 million, net of tax, of unrealized losses were included in
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, as a
result of the dislocation in the credit markets and temporary declines in the fair value for our
MBS investments. We have established a full valuation allowance for the tax asset associated with
this capital loss. In addition, we continue to classify a portion of these investments totaling $8
million as noncurrent assets as we intend to hold these investments until they recover or mature.
Any future change in fair value related to our ARS and MBS investments that we deem to be temporary
would be recorded to Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). If we determine that any
declines below our reported cost basis are other than temporary, we would record a charge to
earnings, as appropriate.
Our assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fair Value as of |
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Current: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable investment securities non strategic |
|
$ |
406,882 |
|
|
$ |
345,109 |
|
|
$ |
58,350 |
|
|
$ |
3,423 |
|
|
$ |
1,291,840 |
|
Marketable investment securities strategic |
|
|
53,822 |
|
|
|
53,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
576,813 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current marketable investment securities |
|
|
460,704 |
|
|
|
398,931 |
|
|
|
58,350 |
|
|
|
3,423 |
|
|
|
1,868,653 |
|
Noncurrent: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable investment securities restricted |
|
|
68,296 |
|
|
|
68,296 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,894 |
|
Marketable investment securities non strategic |
|
|
100,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other investment securities |
|
|
4,155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,155 |
|
|
|
11,404 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent marketable investment and other securities |
|
|
172,529 |
|
|
|
68,296 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104,233 |
|
|
|
70,298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total marketable investment and other securities |
|
$ |
633,233 |
|
|
$ |
467,227 |
|
|
$ |
58,350 |
|
|
$ |
107,656 |
|
|
$ |
1,938,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our marketable investment securities as of December 31, 2007 included $947 million of marketable
investment securities that were distributed to EchoStar in connection with the Spin-off (see Note
1).
15
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
Changes in Level 3 instruments are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Investment |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Securities |
|
Balance as of January 1, 2008 |
|
$ |
211,999 |
|
|
$ |
200,595 |
|
|
$ |
11,404 |
|
Net realized/unrealized gains/(losses) included in earnings |
|
|
(7,249 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,249 |
) |
Net realized/unrealized gains/(losses) included in other comprehensive income |
|
|
(92,788 |
) |
|
|
(92,788 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Purchases, issuances and settlements, net |
|
|
(4,306 |
) |
|
|
(4,306 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
107,656 |
|
|
$ |
103,501 |
|
|
$ |
4,155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable and Non-Marketable Investment Securities
We currently classify all marketable investment securities as available-for-sale. We adjust the
carrying value of our available-for-sale securities to fair value and report the related temporary
unrealized gains and losses as a separate component of Accumulated other comprehensive income
(loss) within Total stockholders equity (deficit), net of related deferred income tax.
Declines in the fair value of a marketable investment security which are estimated to be other
than temporary are recognized in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, thus
establishing a new cost basis for such investment. We evaluate our marketable investment
securities portfolio on a quarterly basis to determine whether declines in the fair value of these
securities are other than temporary. This quarterly evaluation consists of reviewing, among other
things, the fair value of our marketable investment securities compared to the carrying amount, the
historical volatility of the price of each security and any market and company specific factors
related to each security. Generally, absent specific factors to the contrary, declines in the fair
value of investments below cost basis for a continuous period of less than six months are
considered to be temporary. Declines in the fair value of investments for a continuous period of
six to nine months are evaluated on a case by case basis to determine whether any company or
market-specific factors exist which would indicate that such declines are other than temporary.
Declines in the fair value of investments below cost basis for a continuous period greater than
nine months are considered other than temporary and are recorded as charges to earnings, absent
specific factors to the contrary.
As of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, we had accumulated unrealized gains (losses), net
of related tax effect, of $100 million in losses and $30 million in gains, respectively, as a part
of Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) within Total stockholders equity (deficit).
During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, in accordance with our impairment policy, we
recorded $148 million and $4 million in charges to earnings for other than temporary declines in
the fair value of our marketable and non-marketable investment securities, respectively. During
the nine months ended September 30, 2007, we did not record any charge to earnings for other than
temporary declines in the fair value of our marketable investment securities. In addition, during
the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, we recognized realized net gains on the sale of
marketable investment securities of $3 million and $10 million, respectively.
Our strategic marketable investment securities are highly speculative and have experienced and
continue to experience volatility. As of September 30, 2008, a significant portion of our
strategic investment portfolio consisted of securities of a single issuer and the value of that
portfolio therefore depends on the value of that issuer. If the fair value of our strategic
marketable investment securities portfolio does not remain above cost basis or if we become aware
of any market or company specific factors that indicate that the carrying value of certain of our
securities is impaired, we may be required to record charges to earnings in future periods equal to
the amount of the decline in fair value. During October 2008, the value of our strategic
marketable investment securities of $54 million declined in excess of 40%.
16
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
Marketable Investment Securities in a Loss Position. The following table reflects the length of
time that the individual securities have been in an unrealized loss position, aggregated by
investment category. As of September 30, 2008, the unrealized losses on our investments in debt
securities primarily represent investments in auction rate, mortgage and asset-backed securities.
We are not aware of any specific factors which indicate that the underlying issuers of these
investments would not be able to pay interest as it becomes due or repay the principal at maturity.
Therefore, we believe that these changes in the estimated fair values of these marketable
investment securities are related to temporary market fluctuations. In addition, we have the
ability and intent to hold our investments in these debt securities until they recover or mature.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
Primary |
|
Less than Six Months |
|
|
Six to Nine Months |
|
|
Nine Months or More |
|
Investment |
|
Reason for |
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
Category |
|
Unrealized Loss |
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
Temporary market |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities |
|
fluctuations |
|
$ |
57,799 |
|
|
$ |
(432 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
358,811 |
|
|
$ |
(99,581 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
$ |
57,799 |
|
|
$ |
(432 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
358,811 |
|
|
$ |
(99,581 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
Temporary market |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities |
|
fluctuations |
|
$ |
361,347 |
|
|
$ |
(7,168 |
) |
|
$ |
163,230 |
|
|
$ |
(1,909 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
Temporary market |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities |
|
fluctuations |
|
|
186,352 |
|
|
|
(16,192 |
) |
|
|
2,124 |
|
|
|
(1,027 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
$ |
547,699 |
|
|
$ |
(23,360 |
) |
|
$ |
165,354 |
|
|
$ |
(2,936 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Investment Securities
We also have several strategic investments in certain equity securities which are included in
Other noncurrent assets, net on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Our other investment
securities consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
Other Investment Securities |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Cost method |
|
$ |
15,794 |
|
|
$ |
108,355 |
|
Equity method |
|
|
30,179 |
|
|
|
68,127 |
|
Fair value method |
|
|
4,155 |
|
|
|
11,404 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
50,128 |
|
|
$ |
187,886 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in other investment securities as of September 30, 2008 compared to December 31, 2007
primarily resulted from the distribution of assets to EchoStar in connection with the Spin-off (see
Note 1). In addition, during the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we recorded a $53 million
gain on the sale of one of our non-marketable investment securities.
Generally, we account for our unconsolidated equity investments under either the equity method or
cost method of accounting. Because these equity securities are generally not publicly traded, it
is not practical to regularly estimate the fair value of the investments; however, these
investments are subject to an evaluation for other than temporary impairment on a quarterly basis.
This quarterly evaluation consists of reviewing, among other things, company business plans and
current financial statements, if available, for factors that may indicate an impairment of our
investment. Such factors may include, but are not limited to, cash flow concerns, material
litigation, violations of debt covenants and changes in business strategy. The fair value of these
equity investments is not estimated unless there are
17
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
identified changes in circumstances that may
indicate an impairment exists and these changes are likely to have a significant adverse effect on
the fair value of the investment.
We also have a strategic investment in non-public preferred stock, public common stock and
convertible debt of a foreign public company. The debt, which is convertible into the issuers
publicly traded common shares, is accounted for under the fair value method with changes in fair
value reported each period as unrealized gains or losses in Other income or expense in our
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. We estimate the fair value of the convertible
debt using certain assumptions and judgments in applying a discounted cash flow analysis and the
Black-Scholes option pricing model including the fair market value of the underlying common stock
price as of that date. During 2006, we converted a portion of the convertible debt to public
common shares and determined that we have the ability to significantly influence the operating
decisions of the issuer. Consequently, we account for the common share component of this
investment under the equity method of accounting. As a result of our change to equity method
accounting, we evaluate the common share component of this investment on a quarterly basis to
determine whether there has been a decline in the value that is other than temporary. Because the
shares are publicly traded, this quarterly evaluation considers the fair market value of the common
shares in addition to the other factors described above for equity and cost method investments.
When impairments occur related to our foreign investments, any Cumulative translation adjustment
associated with these investments will remain in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
within Total stockholders equity (deficit) on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets until
the investments are sold or otherwise liquidated; at which time, they will be released into our
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations.
Our ability to realize value from our strategic investments in companies that are not publicly
traded depends on the success of those companies businesses and their ability to obtain sufficient
capital to execute their business plans. Because private markets are not as liquid as public
markets, there is also increased risk that we will not be able to sell these investments, or that
when we desire to sell them we will not be able to obtain fair value for them.
Other income and expense on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations includes changes
in the carrying amount of our marketable and non-marketable investment securities and other items
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
For the Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Marketable investment securities gains (losses) on sales/exchange |
|
$ |
(363 |
) |
|
$ |
687 |
|
|
$ |
2,120 |
|
|
$ |
7,161 |
|
Other investment securities gains (losses) on sales |
|
|
53,473 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,473 |
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable investment securities other than temporary impairments |
|
|
(148,003 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(148,003 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other investment securities unrealized gains (losses) on fair value
investments and other than temporary impairments |
|
|
(10,549 |
) |
|
|
(4,195 |
) |
|
|
(28,259 |
) |
|
|
(25,789 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(613 |
) |
|
|
(2,616 |
) |
|
|
(3,914 |
) |
|
|
(5,471 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(106,055 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,124 |
) |
|
$ |
(124,583 |
) |
|
$ |
(24,099 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Cash and Marketable Investment Securities
As of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, restricted cash and marketable investment
securities included amounts required as collateral for our letters of credit. Additionally,
restricted cash and marketable investment securities as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007
included $105 million and $101 million, respectively, in escrow related to our litigation with
Tivo. On October 6, 2008, the Supreme Court denied our petition for certiorari. As a result,
approximately $105 million was released from the escrow account to Tivo.
18
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
6. Satellites
We presently utilize twelve satellites in geostationary orbit approximately 22,300 miles above the
equator, five of which are owned by us. Each of the owned satellites had an original estimated
minimum useful life of at least 12 years. We lease capacity on six satellites from EchoStar with
terms of up to two years and we account for these as operating leases. (See Note 14 for further
discussion of our satellite leases with EchoStar.) We also lease one satellite from a third party,
which is accounted for as a capital lease pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 13, Accounting for Leases (SFAS 13). The capital lease is depreciated over the fifteen
year term of the satellite service agreement.
Operation of our subscription television service requires that we have adequate satellite
transmission capacity for the programming we offer. Moreover, current competitive conditions
require that we continue to expand our offering of new programming, particularly by launching more
HD local markets and offering more HD national channels. While we generally have had in-orbit
satellite capacity sufficient to transmit our existing channels and some backup capacity to recover
the transmission of certain critical programming, our backup capacity is limited.
In the event of a failure or loss of any of our satellites, we may need to acquire or lease
additional satellite capacity or relocate one of our other satellites and use it as a replacement
for the failed or lost satellite. Such a failure could result in a prolonged loss of critical
programming or a significant delay in our plans to expand programming as necessary to remain
competitive and thus have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
results of operations.
While we believe that overall our satellite fleet is generally in good condition, during 2008 and
prior periods, certain satellites in our fleet have experienced anomalies, some of which have had a
significant adverse impact on their commercial operation. There can be no assurance that future
anomalies will not cause further losses which could impact commercial operation, or the remaining
lives, of the satellites. See discussion of evaluation of impairment in Long-Lived Satellite
Assets below. Recent developments with respect to our satellites are discussed below.
EchoStar I. EchoStar I, a 7000 class satellite, designed and manufactured by Lockheed Martin
Corporation (Lockheed), is currently functioning properly in orbit. However, similar Lockheed
Series 7000 class satellites have experienced total in-orbit failures, including our own EchoStar
II, discussed below. While no telemetry or other data indicates EchoStar I would be expected to
experience a similar failure, Lockheed has been unable to conclude these and other Series 7000
satellites will not experience similar failures. EchoStar I, which was launched in December 1995,
is fully depreciated.
EchoStar II. On July 14, 2008, our EchoStar II satellite experienced a failure that rendered the
satellite a total loss. EchoStar II had been operating from the 148 degree orbital location
primarily as a back-up satellite, but had provided local network channel service to Alaska and six
other small markets. All programming and other services previously broadcast from EchoStar II were
restored to Echostar I, the primary satellite at the 148 degree location, within several hours
after the failure. The $6 million book value of EchoStar II was written-off during the second
quarter of 2008.
EchoStar V. EchoStar V was originally designed with a minimum 12-year design life. Momentum wheel
failures in prior years, together with relocation of the satellite between orbital locations,
resulted in increased fuel consumption, as previously disclosed. These issues have not impacted
commercial operation of the satellite. Prior to 2008, EchoStar V also experienced anomalies
resulting in the loss of ten solar array strings. During 2008, three additional solar array
strings on the satellite have failed. The solar array failures, which will result in a reduction
in the number of transponders to which power can be provided in later years, have not impacted
commercial operation of the satellite to date. As of October 2008, EchoStar V was fully
depreciated.
19
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
EchoStar XI. EchoStar XI was launched in July 2008 and commenced commercial operation at the 110
degree orbital location during August 2008, where it provides additional high-powered capacity to
support expansion of our programming services, including high definition programming.
EchoStar XV. On April 14, 2008, Space Systems/Loral, Inc. began the construction of EchoStar XV, a
direct broadcast satellite expected to launch during 2010. This satellite will enable better
bandwidth utilization, provide back-up protection for our existing offerings, and could allow us to
offer other value-added services.
AMC-14. In connection with the Spin-off, we distributed our AMC-14 satellite lease agreement with
SES Americom (SES) to EchoStar with the intent to lease the entire capacity of the satellite from
EchoStar. During March 2008, AMC-14 experienced a launch anomaly and failed to reach its intended
orbit. SES subsequently declared the AMC-14 satellite a total loss due to a lack of viable options
to reposition the satellite to its proper geostationary orbit. We did not incur any financial
liability as a result of the AMC-14 satellite being declared a total loss.
Long-Lived Satellite Assets
We account for impairments of long-lived satellite assets in accordance with the provisions of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of
Long-Lived Assets (SFAS 144). SFAS 144 requires a long-lived asset or asset group to be tested
for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstance indicate that its carrying amount may
not be recoverable. Based on the guidance under SFAS 144, we evaluate our owned and capital leased
satellites for recoverability as one asset group. While certain of the anomalies discussed above,
and previously disclosed, may be considered to represent a significant adverse change in the
physical condition of an individual satellite, based on the redundancy designed within each
satellite and considering the asset grouping, these anomalies (none of which caused a loss of
service to subscribers for an extended period) are not considered to be significant events that
would require evaluation for impairment recognition pursuant to the guidance under SFAS 144.
Unless and until a specific satellite is abandoned or otherwise determined to have no service
potential, the net carrying amount related to the satellite would not be written off.
7. Intangible Assets
As of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, our identifiable intangibles subject to
amortization consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
Intangible |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Intangible |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Contract-based |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
192,845 |
|
|
$ |
(60,754 |
) |
Customer and reseller relationships |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,898 |
|
|
|
(70,433 |
) |
Technology-based |
|
|
5,814 |
|
|
|
(388 |
) |
|
|
69,797 |
|
|
|
(9,478 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
5,814 |
|
|
$ |
(388 |
) |
|
$ |
359,540 |
|
|
$ |
(140,665 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of January 1, 2008, intangible assets with a net book value of $215 million were distributed to
EchoStar in connection with the Spin-off (see Note 1). Amortization of our intangible assets was
less than $1 million and $9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Amortization was $5
million and $27 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
We made a $712 million deposit for 700 MHz wireless licenses in an FCC auction. The FCC has not
yet issued the licenses. We will be required to make significant additional investments or partner
with others to commercialize these licenses and satisfy FCC build-out requirements.
20
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
8. Long-Term Debt
3% Convertible Subordinated Note due 2010
During the three months ended September 30, 2008, we repaid our $500 million 3% Convertible
Subordinated Note due in 2010.
5 3/4% Senior Notes due 2008
During the three months ended September 30, 2008, we repurchased $28 million of our 5 3/4% Senior
Notes due 2008 in open market transactions. On October 1, 2008, the remaining balance of $972
million was redeemed.
3% Convertible Subordinated Note due 2011
Our 3% Convertible Subordinated Note due 2011, which was sold to CenturyTel Service Group, LLC
(CTL) in a privately negotiated transaction, has an aggregate principal amount of $25 million and
is convertible into 481,881 shares of our Class A common stock at the option of CTL (an effective
conversion price of $51.88 per share). The number of shares was adjusted from 398,724 shares of
our Class A common stock during the first quarter 2008 in connection with the Spin-off and as
required by the terms of the Note.
Commencing August 25, 2009, we may redeem, and CTL may require us to repurchase, all or a portion
of the note without a premium. Therefore, during the three months ended September 30, 2008, this
note was reclassified to current liabilities on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
7 3/4% Senior Notes due 2015
On May 27, 2008, we sold $750 million aggregate principal amount of our seven-year, 7 3/4% Senior
Notes due May 31, 2015. Interest accrues at an annual rate of 7 3/4% and is payable semi-annually
in cash, in arrears on May 31 and November 30 of each year, commencing on November 30, 2008. The
net proceeds that we received from the sale of the notes are intended to be used for general
corporate purposes.
The 7 3/4% Senior Notes are redeemable, in whole or in part, at any time at a redemption price equal
to 100% of the principal amount plus a make-whole premium, as defined in the related indenture,
together with accrued and unpaid interest. Prior to May 31, 2011, we may also redeem up to 35% of
each of the 7 3/4% Senior Notes at specified premiums with the net cash proceeds from certain equity
offerings or capital contributions.
The 7 3/4% Senior Notes are:
|
|
|
general unsecured senior obligations of EDBS; |
|
|
|
|
ranked equally in right of payment with all of EDBS and the guarantors existing
and future unsecured senior debt; and |
|
|
|
|
ranked effectively junior to our and the guarantors current and future secured
senior indebtedness up to the value of the collateral securing such indebtedness. |
The indenture related to the 7 3/4% Senior Notes contains restrictive covenants that, among other
things, impose limitations on the ability of EDBS and its restricted subsidiaries to:
|
|
|
incur additional debt; |
|
|
|
|
pay dividends or make distribution on EDBS capital stock or repurchase EDBS
capital stock; |
|
|
|
|
make certain investments; |
|
|
|
|
create liens or enter into sale and leaseback transactions;
|
21
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
enter into transactions with affiliates; |
|
|
|
|
merge or consolidate with another company; and |
|
|
|
|
transfer and sell assets. |
In the event of a change of control, as defined in the related indenture, we would be required to
make an offer to repurchase all or any part of a holders 7 3/4% Senior Notes at a purchase price
equal to 101% of the aggregate principal amount thereof, together with accrued and unpaid interest
thereon, to the date of repurchase.
Capital Lease Obligations
Future minimum lease payments under our capital lease obligations remaining after the Spin-off,
together with the present value of the net minimum lease payments as of September 30, 2008, are as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
|
2008 (remaining three months) |
|
$ |
12,000 |
|
2009 |
|
|
48,000 |
|
2010 |
|
|
48,000 |
|
2011 |
|
|
48,000 |
|
2012 |
|
|
48,000 |
|
2013 |
|
|
48,000 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
400,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments |
|
|
652,000 |
|
Less: Amount representing lease of the orbital location and estimated executory costs (primarily
insurance and maintenance) including profit thereon, included in total minimum lease payments |
|
|
(353,220 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net minimum lease payments |
|
|
298,780 |
|
Less: Amount representing interest |
|
|
(111,299 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Present value of net minimum lease payments |
|
|
187,481 |
|
Less: Current portion |
|
|
(8,290 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Long-term portion of capital lease obligations |
|
$ |
179,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
9. Stockholders Equity (Deficit)
Common Stock Repurchase Program
Our board of directors previously authorized stock repurchases of up to $1.0 billion of our Class A
common stock. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, we repurchased 3.1
million shares of our common stock for $82 million. In November 2008, our board of directors
extended the plan and authorized an increase in the maximum dollar value of shares that may be
repurchased under the plan, such that we are currently authorized to repurchase up to $1.0 billion
of our outstanding shares through and including December 31, 2009.
10. Income Tax
Our income tax policy is to record the estimated future tax effects of temporary differences
between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and amounts reported on our Condensed Consolidated
Balance Sheets, as well as probable operating loss, tax credit and other carryforwards. We follow
the guidelines set forth in SFAS 109 regarding the recoverability of any tax assets recorded on the
balance sheet and provide any necessary valuation allowances as required. In accordance with SFAS
109, we periodically evaluate our need for a valuation allowance. Determining necessary valuation
allowances requires us to make assessments about historical financial information as well as the
timing of future events, including the probability of expected future taxable income and available
tax planning opportunities.
22
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
The effective tax rates for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 were 59.4% and
41.8%, respectively. These effective tax rates exceed our expected blended statutory Federal and
State tax rate of approximately 38.5% primarily due to the establishment of valuation allowances
against deferred tax assets related to the impairment of marketable and non-marketable investment
securities, partially offset by reductions in our accrual for uncertain tax positions, which were
accounted for as discrete items, and fully recognized during the three months ended September 30,
2008.
11. Commitments and Contingencies
Commitments
Future maturities of our contractual obligations as of September 30, 2008 are summarized as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due by period |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt obligations |
|
$ |
5,746,555 |
|
|
$ |
971,555 |
|
|
$ |
25,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
500,000 |
|
|
$ |
3,250,000 |
|
Satellite-related obligations |
|
|
923,941 |
|
|
|
96,947 |
|
|
|
123,744 |
|
|
|
75,894 |
|
|
|
52,044 |
|
|
|
52,044 |
|
|
|
52,044 |
|
|
|
471,224 |
|
Capital lease obligations |
|
|
187,481 |
|
|
|
2,015 |
|
|
|
8,445 |
|
|
|
9,097 |
|
|
|
9,800 |
|
|
|
10,556 |
|
|
|
11,371 |
|
|
|
136,197 |
|
Operating lease obligations |
|
|
104,600 |
|
|
|
10,986 |
|
|
|
40,153 |
|
|
|
19,567 |
|
|
|
13,743 |
|
|
|
7,731 |
|
|
|
4,546 |
|
|
|
7,874 |
|
Purchase obligations |
|
|
1,500,077 |
|
|
|
1,159,827 |
|
|
|
246,749 |
|
|
|
43,651 |
|
|
|
14,859 |
|
|
|
15,334 |
|
|
|
15,827 |
|
|
|
3,830 |
|
Mortgages and other notes payable |
|
|
47,051 |
|
|
|
840 |
|
|
|
4,102 |
|
|
|
4,140 |
|
|
|
4,372 |
|
|
|
4,619 |
|
|
|
4,180 |
|
|
|
24,798 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
8,509,705 |
|
|
$ |
2,242,170 |
|
|
$ |
448,193 |
|
|
$ |
152,349 |
|
|
$ |
1,094,818 |
|
|
$ |
90,284 |
|
|
$ |
587,968 |
|
|
$ |
3,893,923 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The table above does not include $137 million of liabilities associated with unrecognized tax
benefits which were accrued under the provisions of FIN 48, discussed in Note 2, and are included
on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2008. Of this amount, it is
reasonably possible that $103 million may be paid or settled within the next twelve
months.
In certain circumstances the dates on which we are obligated to make these payments could be
delayed. These amounts will increase to the extent we procure insurance for our satellites or
contract for the construction, launch or lease of additional satellites.
Guarantees
In connection with the Spin-off, we distributed certain satellite lease agreements to EchoStar. We
remain the guarantor under those capital leases for payments totaling approximately $535 million
over the next eight years. In addition, during the first quarter of 2008, EchoStar entered into a
satellite transponder service agreement with a third party for $535 million in payments through
2024, which we subleased from EchoStar and have also guaranteed. As of September 30, 2008, we have
not recorded a liability on the balance sheet for any of these guarantees.
Separation Agreement
In connection with the Spin-off, we have entered into a separation agreement with EchoStar, which
provides for, among other things, the division of liability resulting from litigation. Under the
terms of the separation agreement, EchoStar has assumed liability for any acts or omissions that
relate to its business whether such acts or omissions occurred before or after the Spin-off.
Certain exceptions are provided, including for intellectual property related claims generally,
whereby EchoStar will only be liable for its acts or omissions that occurred following the
Spin-off. Therefore, we have indemnified EchoStar for any potential liability or damages resulting
from intellectual property claims relating to the period prior to the effective date of the
Spin-off.
23
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
Contingencies
Acacia
During 2004, Acacia Media Technologies (Acacia) filed a lawsuit against us in the United States
District Court for the Northern District of California. The suit also named DirecTV, Comcast,
Charter, Cox and a number of smaller cable companies as defendants. Acacia is an intellectual
property holding company which seeks to license an acquired patent portfolio. The suit alleges
infringement of United States Patent Nos. 5,132,992 (the 992 patent), 5,253,275 (the 275 patent),
5,550,863 (the 863 patent), 6,002,720 (the 720 patent) and 6,144,702 (the 702 patent).
The patents relate to certain systems and methods for transmission of digital data. During 2004
and 2005, the Court issued Markman rulings which found that the 992 and 702 patents were not as
broad as Acacia had contended, and that certain terms in the 702 patent were indefinite. The
Court issued additional claim construction rulings on December 14, 2006, March 2, 2007, October 19,
2007, and February 13, 2008. On March 12, 2008, the Court issued an order outlining a schedule for
filing dispositive invalidity motions based on its claim constructions. Acacia has agreed to
stipulate to invalidity based on the Courts claim constructions in order to proceed immediately to
the Federal Circuit on appeal. The Court, however, has permitted us to file additional invalidity
motions.
Acacias various patent infringement cases have been consolidated for pre-trial purposes in the
United States District Court for the Northern District of California. We intend to vigorously
defend this case. In the event that a Court ultimately determines that we infringe any of the
patents, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages and/or an
injunction that could require us to materially modify certain user-friendly features that we
currently offer to consumers. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the
suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Broadcast Innovation, L.L.C.
In 2001, Broadcast Innovation, L.L.C. (Broadcast Innovation) filed a lawsuit against us, DirecTV,
Thomson Consumer Electronics and others in Federal District Court in Denver, Colorado. The suit
alleges infringement of United States Patent Nos. 6,076,094 (the 094 patent) and 4,992,066 (the
066 patent). The 094 patent relates to certain methods and devices for transmitting and
receiving data along with specific formatting information for the data. The 066 patent relates to
certain methods and devices for providing the scrambling circuitry for a pay television system on
removable cards. We examined these patents and believe that they are not infringed by any of our
products or services. Subsequently, DirecTV and Thomson settled with Broadcast Innovation leaving
us as the only defendant.
During 2004, the judge issued an order finding the 066 patent invalid. Also in 2004, the Court
ruled the 094 patent invalid in a parallel case filed by Broadcast Innovation against Charter and
Comcast. In 2005, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit overturned the 094
patent finding of invalidity and remanded the case back to the District Court. During June 2006,
Charter filed a reexamination request with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. The
Court has stayed the case pending reexamination. Our case remains stayed pending resolution of the
Charter case.
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a Court ultimately determines that we
infringe any of the patents, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble
damages and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain user-friendly
features that we currently offer to consumers. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the
outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
24
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
Channel Bundling Class Action
On September 21, 2007, a purported class of cable and satellite subscribers filed an antitrust
action against us in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The
suit also names as defendants DirecTV, Comcast, Cablevision, Cox, Charter, Time Warner, Inc., Time
Warner Cable, NBC Universal, Viacom, Fox Entertainment Group, and Walt Disney Company. The suit
alleges, among other things, that the defendants engaged in a conspiracy to provide customers with
access only to bundled channel offerings as opposed to giving customers the ability to purchase
channels on an a la carte basis. We filed a motion to dismiss, which the Court denied in July
2008. We intend to vigorously defend this case. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty
the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Datasec
During April 2008, Datasec Corporation (Datasec) sued us and DirecTV Corporation in the United
States District Court for the Central District of California, alleging infringement of U.S.
Patent No. 6,075,969 (the 969 patent). The 969 patent was issued in 2000 to inventor Bruce
Lusignan, and is entitled Method for Receiving Signals from a Constellation of Satellites in
Close Geosynchronous Orbit. In September 2008, Datasec voluntarily dismissed its case without
prejudice.
Distant Network Litigation
During October 2006, a District Court in Florida entered a permanent nationwide injunction
prohibiting us from offering distant network channels to consumers effective December 1, 2006.
Distant networks are ABC, NBC, CBS and Fox network channels which originate outside the community
where the consumer who wants to view them, lives. We have turned off all of our distant network
channels and are no longer in the distant network business. Termination of these channels resulted
in, among other things, a small reduction in average monthly revenue per subscriber and free cash
flow, and a temporary increase in subscriber churn. The plaintiffs in that litigation allege that
we are in violation of the Courts injunction and have appealed a District Court decision finding
that we are not in violation. On July 7, 2008, the Eleventh Circuit rejected the plaintiffs
appeal and affirmed the decision of the District Court.
Enron Commercial Paper Investment
During October 2001, we received approximately $40 million from the sale of Enron commercial paper
to a third party broker. That commercial paper was ultimately purchased by Enron. During November
2003, an action was commenced in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of
New York against approximately 100 defendants, including us, who invested in Enrons commercial
paper. The complaint alleges that Enrons October 2001 purchase of its commercial paper was a
fraudulent conveyance and voidable preference under bankruptcy laws. We dispute these allegations.
We typically invest in commercial paper and notes which are rated in one of the four highest
rating categories by at least two nationally recognized statistical rating organizations. At the
time of our investment in Enron commercial paper, it was considered to be high quality and low
risk. We intend to vigorously defend this case. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty
the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Finisar Corporation
Finisar Corporation (Finisar) obtained a $100 million verdict in the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas against DirecTV for patent infringement. Finisar alleged that
DirecTVs electronic program guide and other elements of its system infringe United States Patent
No. 5,404,505 (the 505 patent).
In July 2006, we, together with NagraStar LLC, filed a Complaint for Declaratory Judgment in the
United States District Court for the District of Delaware against Finisar that asks the Court to
declare that they and we do not
25
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
infringe, and have not infringed, any valid claim of the 505 patent. Trial is not currently
scheduled. The District Court has stayed our action until the Federal Circuit has resolved
DirecTVs appeal. During April 2008, the Federal Circuit reversed the judgment against DirecTV and
ordered a new trial. We are evaluating the Federal Circuits decision to determine the impact on
our action.
We intend to vigorously prosecute this case. In the event that a Court ultimately determines that
we infringe this patent, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages
and/or an injunction that could require us to modify our system architecture. We cannot predict
with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential
liability or damages.
Global Communications
On April 19, 2007, Global Communications, Inc. (Global) filed a patent infringement action
against us in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. The suit alleges
infringement of United States Patent No. 6,947,702 (the 702 patent). This patent, which involves
satellite reception, was issued in September 2005. On October 24, 2007, the United States Patent
and Trademark Office granted our request for reexamination of the 702 patent and issued an Office
Action finding that all of the claims of the 702 patent were invalid. At the request of the
parties, the District Court stayed the litigation until the reexamination proceeding is concluded
and/or other Global patent applications issue. We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the
event that a Court ultimately determines that we infringe the 702 patent, we may be subject to
substantial damages, which may include treble damages and/or an injunction that could require us to
materially modify certain user-friendly features that we currently offer to consumers. We cannot
predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any
potential liability or damages.
Katz Communications
On June 21, 2007, Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing, L.P. (Katz) filed a patent infringement
action against us in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The
suit alleges infringement of 19 patents owned by Katz. The patents relate to interactive voice
response, or IVR, technology. We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a Court
ultimately determines that we infringe any of the asserted patents, we may be subject to
substantial damages, which may include treble damages and/or an injunction that could require us to
materially modify certain user-friendly features that we currently offer to consumers. We cannot
predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any
potential liability or damages.
Personalized Media Communications
In February 2008, Personalized Media Communications, Inc. filed suit against us, EchoStar and
Motorola, Inc. in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas alleging
infringement of United States Patent Nos. 4,694,490 (the 490 patent), 5,109,414 (the 414
patent), 4,965,825 (the 825 patent), 5,233,654 (the 654 patent), 5,335,277 (the 277 patent), and 5,887,243 (the 243 patent), all of which were issued
to John Harvey and James Cuddihy as named inventors. The 490 patent, the 414 patent, the 825
patent, the 654 patent and the 277 patent are defined as the Harvey Patents. The Harvey
Patents are entitled Signal Processing Apparatus and
26
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
Methods. The lawsuit alleges, among other things, that our DBS system receives program content
at broadcast reception and satellite uplinking facilities and transmits such program content, via
satellite, to remote satellite receivers. The lawsuit further alleges that we infringe the
Harvey Patents by transmitting and using a DBS signal specifically encoded to enable the subject
receivers to function in a manner that infringes the Harvey Patents, and by selling services via
DBS transmission processes which infringe the Harvey Patents.
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a Court ultimately determines that we
infringe any of the asserted patents, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include
treble damages and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain
user-friendly features that we currently offer to consumers. We cannot predict with any degree of
certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Retailer Class Actions
During 2000, lawsuits were filed by retailers in Colorado state and federal court attempting to
certify nationwide classes on behalf of certain of our retailers. The plaintiffs are requesting
the Courts declare certain provisions of, and changes to, alleged agreements between us and the
retailers invalid and unenforceable, and to award damages for lost incentives and payments, charge
backs, and other compensation. We have asserted a variety of counterclaims. The federal court
action has been stayed during the pendency of the state court action. We filed a motion for
summary judgment on all counts and against all plaintiffs. The plaintiffs filed a motion for
additional time to conduct discovery to enable them to respond to our motion. The Court granted
limited discovery which ended during 2004. The plaintiffs claimed we did not provide adequate
disclosure during the discovery process. The Court agreed, and denied our motion for summary
judgment as a result. The final impact of the Courts ruling cannot be fully assessed at this
time. During April 2008, the Court granted plaintiffs class certification motion. Trial has been
set for April 2009. We intend to vigorously defend this case. We cannot predict with any degree
of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Superguide
During 2000, Superguide Corp. (Superguide) filed suit against us, DirecTV, Thomson and others in
the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, Asheville Division,
alleging infringement of United States Patent Nos. 5,038,211 (the 211 patent), 5,293,357 (the 357
patent) and 4,751,578 (the 578 patent) which relate to certain electronic program guide functions,
including the use of electronic program guides to control VCRs. Superguide sought injunctive and
declaratory relief and damages in an unspecified amount. In October 2008, we reached a settlement
with Superguide which did not have a material impact on our results of operations.
Tivo Inc.
On January 31, 2008, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed in part and
reversed in part the April 2006 jury verdict concluding that certain of our digital video
recorders, or DVRs, infringed a patent held by Tivo. In its decision, the Federal Circuit affirmed
the jurys verdict of infringement on Tivos software claims, upheld the award of damages from
the District Court, and ordered that the stay of the District Courts injunction against us, which
was issued pending appeal, will dissolve when the appeal becomes final. The Federal Circuit,
however, found that we did not literally infringe Tivos hardware claims, and remanded such
claims back to the District Court for further proceedings. On October 6, 2008, the Supreme Court
denied our petition for certiorari. As a result, approximately $105 million was released from an
escrow account to Tivo.
In addition, we have developed and deployed next-generation DVR software to our customers DVRs.
This improved software is fully operational and has been automatically downloaded to current
customers (our alternative technology). We have formal legal opinions from outside counsel that conclude that
our alternative technology does not infringe, literally or under the doctrine of equivalents,
either the hardware or software claims of Tivos patent. Tivo has filed a motion for contempt
alleging that we are in violation of the Courts injunction. We
27
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
have vigorously opposed the motion arguing that the Courts injunction does not apply to DVRs that
have received our alternative technology, that our alternative technology does not infringe Tivos
patent, and that we are in compliance with the injunction. A hearing was held on Tivos motion for
contempt on September 4, 2008 and we are waiting for a decision from the District Court.
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 5, Accounting for
Contingencies (SFAS 5), we recorded a total reserve of $132 million on our Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets to reflect the jury verdict, supplemental damages and pre-judgment
interest awarded by the Texas court. This amount also includes the estimated cost of any software
infringement prior to implementation of our alternative technology, plus interest subsequent to the
jury verdict.
If we are unsuccessful in defending against Tivos motion for contempt or any subsequent claim that
our alternative technology infringes Tivos patent, we could be prohibited from distributing DVRs
or could be required to modify or eliminate certain user-friendly DVR features that we currently
offer to consumers. In that event we would be at a significant disadvantage to our competitors who
could offer this functionality and, while we would attempt to provide that functionality through
other manufacturers, the adverse affect on our business could be material. We could also have to
pay substantial additional damages.
Voom
On May 28, 2008, Voom HD Holdings (Voom) filed a complaint against us in New York Supreme Court.
The suit alleges breach of contract arising from our termination of the affiliation agreement we
had with Voom for the carriage of certain Voom HD channels on DISH Network. In January 2008, Voom
sought a preliminary injunction to prevent us from terminating the agreement. The Court denied
Vooms motion, finding, among other things, that Voom was not likely to prevail on the merits of
its case. Voom is claiming over $1.0 billion in damages. We intend to vigorously defend this
case. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the
extent of any potential liability or damages.
Other
In addition to the above actions, we are subject to various other legal proceedings and claims
which arise in the ordinary course of business. In our opinion, the amount of ultimate liability
with respect to any of these actions is unlikely to materially affect our financial position,
results of operations or liquidity.
12. Depreciation and Amortization Expense
Depreciation and amortization expense consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
For the Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Equipment leased to customers |
|
$ |
203,730 |
|
|
$ |
230,221 |
|
|
$ |
625,769 |
|
|
$ |
652,222 |
|
Satellites* |
|
|
21,581 |
|
|
|
64,347 |
|
|
|
71,596 |
|
|
|
184,580 |
|
Furniture, fixtures, equipment and other* |
|
|
18,817 |
|
|
|
38,021 |
|
|
|
60,674 |
|
|
|
136,740 |
|
Identifiable intangible assets subject to amortization* |
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
9,101 |
|
|
|
4,718 |
|
|
|
27,340 |
|
Buildings and improvements* |
|
|
1,228 |
|
|
|
2,460 |
|
|
|
3,503 |
|
|
|
7,319 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total depreciation and amortization. |
|
$ |
245,646 |
|
|
$ |
344,150 |
|
|
$ |
766,260 |
|
|
$ |
1,008,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
The period-over-period decreases in depreciation and amortization expense are primarily a result
of the distribution of depreciable assets to EchoStar in connection with the Spin-off (see Note 1).
|
28
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
Cost of sales and operating expense categories included in our accompanying Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Operations do not include depreciation expense related to satellites or equipment
leased to customers.
13. Segment Reporting
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 131, Disclosures About Segments of an Enterprise
and Related Information (SFAS 131) establishes standards for reporting information about
operating segments in annual financial statements of public business enterprises and requires that
those enterprises report selected information about operating segments in interim financial reports
issued to stockholders. Operating segments are components of an enterprise about which separate
financial information is available and regularly evaluated by the chief operating decision maker(s)
of an enterprise. Total assets by segment have not been specified because the information is not
available to the chief operating decision-maker. The All Other category consists of revenue and
net income (loss) from other operating segments for which the disclosure requirements of SFAS 131
do not apply. Based on the standards set forth in SFAS 131, following the January 1, 2008 Spin-off
discussed in Note 1, we operate in only one reportable segment, the DISH Network segment, which
provides a DBS subscription television service in the United States.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
For the Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DISH Network |
|
$ |
2,936,781 |
|
|
$ |
2,716,006 |
|
|
$ |
8,696,165 |
|
|
$ |
8,001,394 |
|
ETC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118,721 |
|
All other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,619 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,079 |
|
Eliminations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,434 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,874 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
2,936,781 |
|
|
$ |
2,794,327 |
|
|
$ |
8,696,165 |
|
|
$ |
8,199,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DISH Network |
|
$ |
91,895 |
|
|
$ |
190,880 |
|
|
$ |
686,363 |
|
|
$ |
577,290 |
|
ETC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,434 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,806 |
) |
All other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,535 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net income (loss) |
|
$ |
91,895 |
|
|
$ |
199,680 |
|
|
$ |
686,363 |
|
|
$ |
581,019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Geographic Information
Revenues are attributed to geographic regions based upon the location where the sale originated.
United States revenue includes transactions with both United States and international customers.
Following the January 1, 2008 Spin-off discussed in Note 1, we operate in only one geographic
region.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
States |
|
|
International |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Long-lived assets, including FCC authorizations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
3,307,826 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,307,826 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
5,182,587 |
|
|
$ |
196,958 |
|
|
$ |
5,379,545 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
8,696,165 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8,696,165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2007 |
|
$ |
8,136,144 |
|
|
$ |
63,176 |
|
|
$ |
8,199,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
14. Related Party Transactions with EchoStar
Following the Spin-off, EchoStar has operated as a separate public company and we have no continued
ownership interest in EchoStar. However, a substantial majority of the voting power of the shares
of both companies is owned beneficially by our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman, Charles W.
Ergen.
EchoStar is our primary supplier of set-top boxes and digital broadcast operations and our key
supplier of transponder leasing. Generally all agreements entered into in connection with the
Spin-off are based on pricing at cost plus an additional amount equal to an agreed percentage of
EchoStars cost (unless noted differently below), which will vary depending on the nature of the
products and services provided. Prior to the Spin-off, these products were provided and services
were performed internally at cost. The terms of our agreements with EchoStar provide for an
arbitration mechanism in the event we are unable to reach agreement with EchoStar as to the
additional amounts payable for products and services, under which the arbitrator will determine the
additional amounts payable by reference to the fair market value of the products and services
supplied.
We and EchoStar also entered into certain transitional services agreements pursuant to which we
will obtain certain services and rights from EchoStar, EchoStar will obtain certain services and
rights from us, and we and EchoStar have indemnified each other against certain liabilities arising
from our respective businesses. The following is a summary of the terms of the principle
agreements that we have entered into with EchoStar that have an impact on our results of
operations.
Equipment sales EchoStar
Remanufactured Receiver Agreement. We entered into a remanufactured receiver agreement with
EchoStar under which EchoStar has the right to purchase remanufactured receivers and accessories
from us for a two-year period. EchoStar may terminate the remanufactured receiver agreement for
any reason upon sixty days written notice to us. We may also terminate this agreement if certain
entities acquire us.
Transitional services and other revenue EchoStar
Transition Services Agreement. We entered into a transition services agreement with EchoStar
pursuant to which we, or one of our subsidiaries, provide certain transitional services to
EchoStar. Under the transition services agreement, EchoStar has the right, but not the obligation,
to receive the following services from us: finance, information technology, benefits
administration, travel and event coordination, human resources, human resources development
(training), program management, internal audit and corporate quality, legal, accounting and tax,
and other support services.
The transition services agreement has a term of no longer than two years. We may terminate the
transition services agreement with respect to a particular service for any reason upon thirty days
prior written notice.
Management Services Agreement. In connection with the Spin-off, we entered into a management
services agreement with EchoStar pursuant to which we make certain of our officers available to
provide services (which are primarily legal and accounting services) to EchoStar. Specifically,
Bernard L. Han, R. Stanton Dodge and Paul W. Orban remain employed by us, but also serve as
EchoStars Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President and
General Counsel, and Senior Vice President and Controller, respectively. In addition, Carl E.
Vogel is employed as our Vice Chairman but also provides services to EchoStar as an advisor.
EchoStar makes payments to us based upon an allocable portion of the personnel costs and expenses
incurred by us with respect to such officers (taking into account wages and fringe benefits).
These allocations are based upon the estimated percentages of time to be spent by our executive
officers performing services for EchoStar under the management services agreement. EchoStar will
also reimburse us for direct out-of-pocket costs incurred by us for management services provided to
EchoStar. We and EchoStar evaluate all charges for reasonableness at least annually and make any
adjustments to these charges as we and EchoStar mutually agree upon.
30
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
The management services agreement will continue in effect until the first anniversary of the
Spin-off, and will be renewed automatically for successive one-year periods thereafter, unless
terminated earlier (1) by EchoStar at any time upon at least 30 days prior written notice, (2) by
us at the end of any renewal term, upon at least 180 days prior notice; and (3) by us upon written
notice to EchoStar, following certain changes in control.
Real Estate Lease Agreement. During the three months ended September 30, 2008, we subleased space
at 185 Varick Street, New York, New York to EchoStar for a period of approximately seven years.
The rent on a per square foot basis for this sublease was comparable to per square foot rental
rates of similar commercial property in the same geographic area at the time of the sublease, and
EchoStar is responsible for its portion of the taxes, insurance, utilities and maintenance of the
premises.
Satellite and transmission expenses EchoStar
Broadcast Agreement. We entered into a broadcast agreement with EchoStar, whereby EchoStar
provides broadcast services including teleport services such as transmission and downlinking,
channel origination services, and channel management services, thereby enabling us to deliver
satellite television programming to subscribers. The broadcast agreement has a term of two years;
however, we have the right, but not the obligation, to extend the agreement annually for successive
one-year periods for up to two additional years. We may terminate channel origination services and
channel management services for any reason and without any liability upon sixty days written notice
to EchoStar. If we terminate teleport services for a reason other than EchoStars breach, we shall
pay EchoStar a sum equal to the aggregate amount of the remainder of the expected cost of providing
the teleport services.
Satellite Capacity Agreements. We have entered into satellite capacity agreements with EchoStar on
a transitional basis. Pursuant to these agreements, we lease satellite capacity on satellites
owned or leased by EchoStar. Certain DISH Network subscribers currently point their satellite
antenna at these satellites and this agreement is designed to facilitate the separation of us and
EchoStar by allowing a period of time for these DISH Network subscribers to be moved to satellites
owned or leased by us following the Spin-off. The fees for the services to be provided under the
satellite capacity agreements are based on spot market prices for similar satellite capacity and
will depend upon, among other things, the orbital location of the satellite and the frequency on
which the satellite provides services. Generally, each satellite capacity agreement will terminate
upon the earlier of: (a) the end of life or replacement of the satellite; (b) the date the
satellite fails; (c) the date that the transponder on which service is being provided under the
agreement fails; or (d) two years from the effective date of such agreement.
Cost of sales subscriber promotion subsidies EchoStar
Receiver Agreement. EchoStar is currently our sole supplier of set-top box receivers. During the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, we purchased set-top box and other equipment from
EchoStar totaling $462 million and $1.134 billion, respectively. Of these amounts, $53 million and
$116 million, respectively, are included in Cost of sales subscriber promotion subsidies
EchoStar on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. The remaining amount is included
in Inventories, net and Property and equipment, net on our Condensed Consolidated Balance
Sheets.
Under our receiver agreement with EchoStar, we have the right but not the obligation to purchase
receivers, accessories, and other equipment from EchoStar for a two year period. Additionally,
EchoStar will provide us with standard manufacturer warranties for the goods sold under the
receiver agreement. We may terminate the receiver agreement for any reason upon sixty days written
notice to EchoStar. We may also terminate the receiver agreement if certain entities were to
acquire us. We also have the right, but not the obligation, to extend the receiver agreement
annually for up to two years. The receiver agreement also includes an indemnification provision,
whereby the parties will indemnify each other for certain intellectual property matters.
31
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
General and administrative EchoStar
Product Support Agreement. We need EchoStar to provide product support (including certain
engineering and technical support services and IPTV functionality) for all receivers and related
accessories that EchoStar has sold and will sell to us. As a result, we entered into a product
support agreement, under which we have the right, but not the obligation, to receive product
support services in respect of such receivers and related accessories. The term of the product
support agreement is the economic life of such receivers and related accessories, unless terminated
earlier. We may terminate the product support agreement for any reason upon sixty days prior
written notice.
Real Estate Lease Agreements. We entered into lease agreements with EchoStar so that we can
continue to operate certain properties that were distributed to EchoStar in the Spin-off. The rent
on a per square foot basis for each of the leases is comparable to per square foot rental rates of
similar commercial property in the same geographic area, and EchoStar is responsible for its
portion of the taxes, insurance, utilities and maintenance of the premises. The term of each of
the leases is set forth below:
Inverness Lease Agreement. The lease for 90 Inverness Circle East in Englewood, Colorado,
is for a period of two years.
Meridian Lease Agreement. The lease for 9601 S. Meridian Blvd. in Englewood, Colorado, is
for a period of two years with annual renewal options for up to three additional years.
Santa Fe Lease Agreement. The lease for 5701 S. Santa Fe Dr. in Littleton, Colorado, is for
a period of two years with annual renewal options for up to three additional years.
Services Agreement. We entered into a services agreement with EchoStar under which we have the
right, but not the obligation, to receive logistics, procurement and quality assurance services
from EchoStar. This agreement has a term of two years. We may terminate the services agreement
with respect to a particular service for any reason upon sixty days prior written notice.
Tax sharing agreement
We entered into a tax sharing agreement with EchoStar which governs our and EchoStars respective
rights, responsibilities and obligations after the Spin-off with respect to taxes for the periods
ending on or before the Spin-off. Generally, all pre-Spin-off taxes, including any taxes that are
incurred as a result of restructuring activities undertaken to implement the Spin-off, will be
borne by us, and we will indemnify EchoStar for such taxes. However, we will not be liable for and
will not indemnify EchoStar for any taxes that are incurred as a result of the Spin-off or certain
related transactions failing to qualify as tax-free distributions pursuant to any provision of
Section 355 or Section 361 of the Code because of (i) a direct or indirect acquisition of any of
EchoStars stock, stock options or assets, (ii) any action that EchoStar takes or fails to take or
(iii) any action that EchoStar takes that is inconsistent with the information and representations
furnished to the IRS in connection with the request for the private letter ruling, or to counsel in
connection with any opinion being delivered by counsel with respect to the Spin-off or certain
related transactions. In such case, EchoStar will be solely liable for, and will indemnify us for,
any resulting taxes, as well as any losses, claims and expenses. The tax sharing agreement
terminates after the later of the full period of all applicable statutes of limitations including
extensions or once all rights and obligations are fully effectuated or performed.
32
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
(Unaudited)
Other EchoStar transactions
Nimiq 5 Agreement. On March 11, 2008, EchoStar entered into a transponder service agreement (the
Transponder Agreement) with Bell ExpressVu Inc., in its capacity as General Partner of Bell
ExpressVu Limited Partnership (Bell ExpressVu), which provides, among other things, for the
provision by Bell ExpressVu to EchoStar of service on sixteen (16) BSS transponders on the Nimiq 5
satellite at the 72.7 W.L. orbital location. The Nimiq 5 satellite is expected to be launched in
the second half of 2009. Bell ExpressVu currently has the right to receive service on the entire
communications capacity of the Nimiq 5 satellite pursuant to an agreement with Telesat Canada. On
March 11, 2008, EchoStar also entered into a transponder service agreement with DISH Network L.L.C.
(DISH L.L.C.), our wholly-owned subsidiary, pursuant to which DISH L.L.C. will receive service
from EchoStar on all of the BSS transponders covered by the Transponder Agreement (the DISH
Agreement). DISH Network guaranteed certain obligations of EchoStar under the Transponder
Agreement.
Under the terms of the Transponder Agreement, EchoStar will make certain up-front payments to Bell
ExpressVu through the service commencement date on the Nimiq 5 satellite and thereafter will make
certain monthly payments to Bell ExpressVu for the remainder of the service term. Unless earlier
terminated under the terms and conditions of the Transponder Agreement, the service term will
expire fifteen years following the actual service commencement date of the Nimiq 5 satellite. Upon
expiration of this initial term, EchoStar has the option to continue to receive service on the
Nimiq 5 satellite on a month-to-month basis. Upon a launch failure, in-orbit failure or
end-of-life of the Nimiq 5 satellite, and in certain other circumstances, EchoStar has certain
rights to receive service from Bell ExpressVu on a replacement satellite.
Under the terms of the DISH Agreement, DISH L.L.C. will make certain monthly payments to EchoStar
commencing when the Nimiq 5 satellite is placed into service (the In-Service Date) and continuing
through the service term. Unless earlier terminated under the terms and conditions of the DISH
Agreement, the service term will expire ten years following the In-Service Date. Upon expiration
of the initial term, DISH L.L.C. has the option to renew the DISH Agreement on a year-to-year basis
through the end-of-life of the Nimiq 5 satellite. Upon a launch failure, in-orbit failure or
end-of-life of the Nimiq 5 satellite, and in certain other circumstances, DISH L.L.C. has certain
rights to receive service from EchoStar on a replacement satellite.
33
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
Overview
We have historically positioned the DISH Network satellite television service as the leading
low-cost provider of multi-channel pay TV services principally by offering lower cost programming
packages. At the same time we have sought to offer high quality programming, best-in-class
technology and superior customer service.
We invest significant amounts in subscriber acquisition and retention programs based on our
expectation that long-term subscribers will be profitable. To attract subscribers, we subsidize
the cost of equipment and installation and may also from time to time offer promotional pricing on
programming and other services. We also seek to differentiate DISH Network through the quality of
the equipment we provide to our subscribers, including our highly-rated digital video recorder
(DVR) and high definition (HD) equipment, which we promote to drive subscriber growth and
retention. Subscriber growth is also impacted, positively and negatively, by customer service and
customer experience in ordering, installation and troubleshooting interactions.
During the third quarter 2008, we experienced a net loss of 10,000 DISH Network subscribers. We
believe this net loss resulted primarily from weak economic conditions, aggressive promotional
offerings by our competition, our relative discipline in the amount of discounted programming or
equipment we currently offer, the heavy marketing of HD service by our competition, the growth of
fiber-based pay TV providers, signal theft and other forms of fraud, and operational inefficiencies
at DISH Network. Most of these factors have affected both gross new subscriber additions as well
as existing subscriber churn.
Our distribution relationship with AT&T has been a substantial contributor to our gross and net
subscriber additions over the past several years, accounting for approximately 17% of our gross
subscriber additions for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. This distribution relationship
will terminate on January 31, 2009. It may be difficult for us to develop alternative distribution
channels that will fully replace AT&T and if we are unable to do so, our gross and net subscriber
additions may be impaired, our churn may increase, and our results of operations may be adversely
affected. In addition, approximately 1 million of our current subscribers were acquired through
our distribution relationship with AT&T and these subscribers have historically churned at a higher
rate than our overall subscriber base. Although AT&T is not permitted to target these subscribers
for transition to another pay-TV service and AT&T and we are required to maintain bundled billing
and cooperative customer service for these subscribers, we may still experience churn of these
subscribers following termination of the AT&T distribution relationship.
Our operating costs grew faster than our revenues in the most recent quarter and we can provide no
assurance that this trend will not continue in future periods. Market demand for more advanced
technology equipment and a very competitive environment have caused us to increase our customer
acquisition and retention costs. Customer equipment upgrades are the largest component of our
retention activity. Increased upgrades were primarily driven by customer demand for HD and large
capacity DVR receivers, and by our decision to transmit certain channels exclusively in MPEG-4. We
believe the resulting increase in available satellite bandwidth outweighs the short-term cost of
switching out equipment for some customers, which we expect to continue at least through the first
half of 2009.
Furthermore, we have made and we will continue to make material investments in staffing, training,
information systems, and other initiatives, primarily in our call center and in-home service
businesses. These investments are intended to help combat inefficiencies introduced by the
increasing complexity of our business and technology, improve customer satisfaction, reduce churn,
increase productivity, and allow us to scale better over the long run. We cannot, however, be
certain that our increased spending will ultimately be successful in yielding such returns. In the
meantime, we may continue to incur higher costs as a result of both our operational inefficiencies
and increased spending.
Capital Requirements and Adverse Economic Conditions. Our ability to increase our income or to
generate additional revenues will depend in part on our ability to identify and successfully
exploit opportunities to acquire other businesses or technologies, enter into strategic
partnerships and organically grow our business, including through the development of the 700MHz spectrum that we recently purchased. These activities may
require significant additional capital that may not be available on terms that would be attractive
to us or at all. In particular,
34
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Continued |
current dislocations in the credit markets, which have significantly impacted the availability and
cost of financing, specifically in the leveraged finance markets, may significantly constrain our
ability to obtain financing to support our growth initiatives. These developments in the credit
markets may increase our cost of financing and impair our liquidity position. In addition, these
developments may cause us to defer or abandon new business strategies and transactions that we would
otherwise pursue if financing were available on acceptable terms.
Furthermore, adverse economic conditions, including further deterioration in the credit and equity
markets or wavering consumer confidence, could affect consumer demand for pay-TV services as
consumers may delay purchasing decisions or reduce or reallocate discretionary spending. In
addition, if we are unable to effectively scale in order to provide advanced customer premises
equipment and programming offerings, we may have to devote substantial resources towards these
internal initiatives rather than strategic and organic growth initiatives which could ultimately
harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Liquidity Considerations. As of September 30, 2008, we had $972 million of cash and cash
equivalents and $461 million of current marketable investment securities. On October 1, 2008, we
redeemed the remaining balance of $972 million of our 5 3/4% Senior Notes due 2008, with existing
cash and cash equivalents and current marketable investment securities. We expect that our future
working capital, capital expenditure and debt service requirements will be satisfied from existing
cash and marketable investment securities balances, cash generated from operations or through new
additional capital. However, current dislocations in the credit markets, which have significantly
impacted the availability and pricing of financing, particularly in the high yield debt and
leveraged credit markets, may significantly constrain our ability to obtain financing to fund our
working capital, capital expenditure and debt service requirements and support our growth
initiatives. These developments in the credit markets may have a significant effect on our cost of
financing and our liquidity position and may, as a result, also cause us to defer or abandon
profitable new business strategies that we would otherwise pursue if financing were available on
acceptable terms.
The Spin-off. Effective January 1, 2008, we completed the separation of the assets and businesses
we owned and operated historically into two companies (the Spin-off):
|
|
|
DISH Network, through which we retain our pay-TV business, and |
|
|
|
|
EchoStar Corporation (EchoStar), formerly known as EchoStar Holding Corporation, which
operates the digital set top box business, and holds certain satellites, uplink and
satellite transmission assets, real estate and other assets and related liabilities
formerly held by DISH Network. |
DISH Network and EchoStar now operate as separate public companies, and neither entity has any
ownership interest in the other. However, a majority of the voting power of the shares of both
companies is controlled by our chief executive officer and chairman, Charles W. Ergen. In
connection with the Spin-off, DISH Network entered into certain agreements with EchoStar to define
responsibility for obligations relating to, among other things, set-top box sales, transition
services, taxes, employees and intellectual property, which will have an impact in the future on
several of our key operating metrics. We have entered into certain agreements with EchoStar
subsequent to the Spin-off and we may enter into additional agreements with EchoStar in the future.
We believe that the Spin-off will enable us to focus more directly on the business strategies
relevant to the subscription television business, but we recognize that, particularly during 2008,
we may experience disruptions and loss of synergies in our business due to the separation of the
two businesses, which could in turn increase our costs.
35
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Continued |
EXPLANATION OF KEY METRICS AND OTHER ITEMS
Subscriber-related revenue. Subscriber-related revenue consists principally of revenue from
basic, movie, local, pay-per-view, and international subscription television services, equipment
rental fees and other hardware related fees, including fees for DVRs and additional outlet fees
from subscribers with multiple receivers, advertising services, fees earned from our DishHOME
Protection Plan, equipment upgrade fees, HD programming and other subscriber revenue. Certain of
the amounts included in Subscriber-related revenue are not recurring on a monthly basis.
Equipment sales and other revenue. Equipment sales and other revenue principally includes the
unsubsidized sales of DBS accessories to retailers and other third-party distributors of our
equipment and to DISH Network subscribers. During 2007, this category also included sales of
non-DISH Network digital receivers and related components to international customers and satellite
and transmission revenue, which related to assets that were distributed to EchoStar in connection
with the Spin-off.
Equipment sales, transitional services and other revenue EchoStar. Equipment sales,
transitional services and other revenue EchoStar includes revenue related to equipment sales,
and transitional services and other agreements with EchoStar associated with the Spin-off.
Subscriber-related expenses. Subscriber-related expenses principally include programming
expenses, costs incurred in connection with our in-home service and call center operations, billing
costs, refurbishment and repair costs related to receiver systems, subscriber retention and other
variable subscriber expenses.
Satellite and transmission expenses EchoStar. Satellite and transmission expenses EchoStar
includes the cost of digital broadcast operations provided to us by EchoStar, which were previously
performed internally, including satellite uplinking/downlinking, signal processing, conditional
access management, telemetry, tracking and control and other professional services. In addition,
this category includes the cost of leasing satellite and transponder capacity on satellites that
were distributed to EchoStar in connection with the Spin-off.
Satellite and transmission expenses other. Satellite and transmission expenses other
includes transponder leases and other related services. Prior to the Spin-off, Satellite and
transmission expenses other included costs associated with the operation of our digital
broadcast centers, including satellite uplinking/downlinking, signal processing, conditional access
management, telemetry, tracking and control, satellite and transponder leases, and other related
services, which were previously performed internally.
Equipment, transitional services and other cost of sales. Equipment, transitional services and
other cost of sales principally includes the cost of unsubsidized sales of DBS accessories to
retailers and other distributors of our equipment domestically and to DISH Network subscribers. In
addition, this category includes costs related to equipment sales, transitional services and other
agreements with EchoStar associated with the Spin-off.
During 2007, Equipment, transitional services and other cost of sales also included costs
associated with non-DISH Network digital receivers and related components sold to an international
DBS service provider and to other international customers. As previously discussed, our set-top
box business was distributed to EchoStar in connection with the Spin-off.
Subscriber acquisition costs. In addition to leasing receivers, we generally subsidize
installation and all or a portion of the cost of our receiver systems in order to attract new DISH
Network subscribers. Our Subscriber acquisition costs include the cost of our receiver systems
sold to retailers and other distributors of our equipment, the cost of receiver systems sold
directly by us to subscribers, net costs related to our promotional incentives, and costs related
to installation and acquisition advertising. We exclude the value of equipment capitalized under
our lease program for new subscribers from Subscriber acquisition costs.
36
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Continued |
SAC. Management believes subscriber acquisition cost measures are commonly used by those
evaluating companies in the multi-channel video programming distribution industry. We are not
aware of any uniform standards for calculating the average subscriber acquisition costs per new
subscriber activation, or SAC, and we believe presentations of SAC may not be calculated
consistently by different companies in the same or similar businesses. Our SAC is calculated as
Subscriber acquisition costs, plus the value of equipment capitalized under our lease program for
new subscribers, divided by gross subscriber additions. We include all the costs of acquiring
subscribers (e.g., subsidized and capitalized equipment) as our management believes it is a more
comprehensive measure of how much we are spending to acquire subscribers. We also include all new
DISH Network subscribers in our calculation, including DISH Network subscribers added with little
or no subscriber acquisition costs.
General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses consists primarily of
employee-related costs associated with administrative services such as legal, information systems,
accounting and finance, including non-cash, stock-based compensation expense. It also includes
outside professional fees (e.g., legal, information systems and accounting services) and other
items associated with facilities and administration. Following the Spin-off, the general and
administrative expenses associated with the business and assets distributed to EchoStar in
connection with the Spin-off will no longer be reflected in our General and administrative
expenses.
Interest expense. Interest expense primarily includes interest expense, prepayment premiums and
amortization of debt issuance costs associated with our senior debt and convertible subordinated
debt securities (net of capitalized interest) and interest expense associated with our capital
lease obligations.
Other income (expense). The main components of Other income and expense are unrealized gains
and losses from changes in fair value of non-marketable strategic investments accounted for at fair
value, equity in earnings and losses of our affiliates, gains and losses realized on the sale of
investments, and impairment of marketable and non-marketable investment securities.
Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA). EBITDA is defined as
Net income (loss) plus Interest expense net of Interest income, Taxes and Depreciation and
amortization. This non-GAAP measure is reconciled to net income (loss) in our discussion of
Results of Operations below.
DISH Network subscribers. We include customers obtained through direct sales, and through
third-party retail networks and other distribution relationships, in our DISH Network subscriber
count. We also provide DISH Network service to hotels, motels and other commercial accounts. For
certain of these commercial accounts, we divide our total revenue for these commercial accounts by
an amount approximately equal to the retail price of our Americas Top 100 programming package (but
taking into account, periodically, price changes and other factors), and include the resulting
number, which is substantially smaller than the actual number of commercial units served, in our
DISH Network subscriber count.
Average monthly revenue per subscriber (ARPU). We are not aware of any uniform standards for
calculating ARPU and believe presentations of ARPU may not be calculated consistently by other
companies in the same or similar businesses. We calculate average monthly revenue per subscriber,
or ARPU, by dividing average monthly Subscriber-related revenues for the period (total
Subscriber-related revenue during the period divided by the number of months in the period) by
our average DISH Network subscribers for the period. Average DISH Network subscribers are
calculated for the period by adding the average DISH Network subscribers for each month and
dividing by the number of months in the period. Average DISH Network subscribers for each month
are calculated by adding the beginning and ending DISH Network subscribers for the month and
dividing by two.
37
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Continued |
Subscriber churn rate/subscriber turnover. We are not aware of any uniform standards for
calculating subscriber churn rate and believe presentations of subscriber churn rates may not be
calculated consistently by different companies in the same or similar businesses. We calculate
percentage monthly subscriber churn by dividing the number of DISH Network subscribers who
terminate service during each month by total DISH Network subscribers as of the beginning of that
month. We calculate average subscriber churn rate for any period by dividing the number of DISH
Network subscribers who terminated service during that period by the average number of DISH Network
subscribers subject to churn during the period, and further dividing by the number of months in the
period. Average DISH Network subscribers subject to churn during the period are calculated by
adding the DISH Network subscribers as of the beginning of each month in the period and dividing by
the total number of months in the period.
Free cash flow. We define free cash flow as Net cash flows from operating activities less
Purchases of property and equipment, as shown on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash
Flows.
38
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Continued |
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended September 30, 2008 Compared to the Three Months Ended September 30, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Variance |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% |
|
Statements of Operations Data |
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subscriber-related revenue |
|
$ |
2,886,157 |
|
|
$ |
2,699,018 |
|
|
$ |
187,139 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
Equipment sales and other revenue |
|
|
41,918 |
|
|
|
95,309 |
|
|
|
(53,391 |
) |
|
|
(56.0 |
) |
Equipment sales, transitional services and other revenue EchoStar |
|
|
8,706 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,706 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
2,936,781 |
|
|
|
2,794,327 |
|
|
|
142,454 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subscriber-related expenses |
|
|
1,534,133 |
|
|
|
1,384,632 |
|
|
|
149,501 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
% of Subscriber-related revenue |
|
|
53.2 |
% |
|
|
51.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Satellite and transmission expenses EchoStar |
|
|
76,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,848 |
|
|
NM |
% of Subscriber-related revenue |
|
|
2.7 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Satellite and transmission expenses Other |
|
|
7,651 |
|
|
|
50,253 |
|
|
|
(42,602 |
) |
|
|
(84.8 |
) |
% of Subscriber-related revenue |
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment, transitional services and other cost of sales |
|
|
69,315 |
|
|
|
66,745 |
|
|
|
2,570 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
Subscriber acquisition costs |
|
|
437,766 |
|
|
|
400,624 |
|
|
|
37,142 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
147,582 |
|
|
|
151,409 |
|
|
|
(3,827 |
) |
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
% of Total revenue |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
5.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
245,646 |
|
|
|
344,150 |
|
|
|
(98,504 |
) |
|
|
(28.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
2,518,941 |
|
|
|
2,397,813 |
|
|
|
121,128 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
417,840 |
|
|
|
396,514 |
|
|
|
21,326 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income (Expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
16,609 |
|
|
|
37,074 |
|
|
|
(20,465 |
) |
|
|
(55.2 |
) |
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized |
|
|
(101,802 |
) |
|
|
(96,251 |
) |
|
|
(5,551 |
) |
|
|
(5.8 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(106,055 |
) |
|
|
(6,124 |
) |
|
|
(99,931 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense) |
|
|
(191,248 |
) |
|
|
(65,301 |
) |
|
|
(125,947 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
226,592 |
|
|
|
331,213 |
|
|
|
(104,621 |
) |
|
|
(31.6 |
) |
Income tax (provision) benefit, net |
|
|
(134,697 |
) |
|
|
(131,533 |
) |
|
|
(3,164 |
) |
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
Effective tax rate |
|
|
59.4 |
% |
|
|
39.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
91,895 |
|
|
$ |
199,680 |
|
|
$ |
(107,785 |
) |
|
|
(54.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DISH Network subscribers, as of period end (in millions) |
|
|
13.780 |
|
|
|
13.695 |
|
|
|
0.085 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
DISH Network subscriber additions, gross (in millions) |
|
|
0.825 |
|
|
|
0.904 |
|
|
|
(0.079 |
) |
|
|
(8.7 |
) |
DISH Network subscriber additions (losses), net (in millions) |
|
|
(0.010 |
) |
|
|
0.110 |
|
|
|
(0.120 |
) |
|
|
(109.1 |
) |
Average monthly subscriber churn rate |
|
|
2.02 |
% |
|
|
1.94 |
% |
|
|
0.08 |
% |
|
|
4.1 |
|
Average monthly revenue per subscriber (ARPU) |
|
$ |
69.82 |
|
|
$ |
66.01 |
|
|
$ |
3.81 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
Average subscriber acquisition cost per subscriber (SAC) |
|
$ |
735 |
|
|
$ |
646 |
|
|
$ |
89 |
|
|
|
13.8 |
|
EBITDA |
|
$ |
557,431 |
|
|
$ |
734,540 |
|
|
$ |
(177,109 |
) |
|
|
(24.1 |
) |
39
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Continued |
DISH Network subscribers. As of September 30, 2008, we had approximately 13.780 million DISH
Network subscribers compared to approximately 13.695 million subscribers at September 30, 2007, an
increase of 0.6%. DISH Network added approximately 825,000 gross new subscribers for the three
months ended September 30, 2008, compared to approximately 904,000 gross new subscribers during the
same period in 2007.
DISH Network lost approximately 10,000 net subscribers for the three months ended September 30,
2008, compared to adding approximately 110,000 net new subscribers during the same period in 2007.
This decrease primarily resulted from the decrease in gross new subscribers discussed above, an
increase in our subscriber churn rate, and churn on a larger subscriber base. Our percentage
monthly subscriber churn for the three months ended September 30, 2008 was 2.02%, compared to 1.94%
for the same period in 2007. Given the increasingly competitive nature of our industry, it may not
be possible to reduce churn without significantly increasing our spending on customer retention
incentives, which would have a negative effect on our earnings and free cash flow.
We believe our gross and net subscriber additions as well as our subscriber churn have been
negatively impacted by weak economic conditions, aggressive promotional offerings by our
competition, the heavy marketing of HD service offerings by our competition, the growth of
fiber-based pay TV providers, signal theft and other forms of fraud, and operational inefficiencies
at DISH Network. We can not assure you that we will be able to increase our gross and net
subscriber additions or reduce our subscriber churn. We may also be required to substantially
increase our spending in order to increase our gross and net subscriber additions and reduce or
prevent an increase in our subscriber churn.
Our gross and net subscriber additions, and our entire subscriber base are negatively impacted when
existing and new competitors offer attractive promotions or attractive product and service
alternatives, including, among other things, video services bundled with broadband and other
telecommunications services, better priced or more attractive programming packages, including
broader HD programming, and a larger number of HD and standard definition local channels, and more
compelling consumer electronic products and services, including DVRs, video on demand services and
receivers with multiple tuners. We also expect to face increasing competition from content and
other providers who distribute video services directly to consumers over the Internet.
Even if our subscriber churn rate remains constant or declines, we will be required to attract
increasing numbers of new DISH Network subscribers simply to retain and sustain our historical net
subscriber growth rates.
Our distribution relationship with AT&T has been a substantial contributor to our gross and net
subscriber additions over the past several years, accounting for approximately 17% of our gross
subscriber additions for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. This distribution relationship
will terminate on January 31, 2009. It may be difficult for us to develop alternative distribution
channels that will fully replace AT&T and if we are unable to do so, our gross and net subscriber
additions may be impaired, our churn may increase, and our results of operations may be adversely
affected. In addition, approximately 1 million of our current subscribers were acquired through
our distribution relationship with AT&T and these subscribers have historically churned at a higher
rate than our overall subscriber base. Although AT&T is not permitted to target these subscribers
for transition to another pay-TV service and AT&T and we are required to maintain bundled billing
and cooperative customer service for these subscribers, we may still experience churn of these
subscribers following termination of the AT&T distribution relationship.
Subscriber-related revenue. DISH Network Subscriber-related revenue totaled $2.886 billion for
the three months ended September 30, 2008, an increase of $187 million or 6.9% compared to the same
period in 2007. This increase was directly attributable to DISH Network subscriber growth and the
increase in ARPU discussed below.
ARPU. Monthly average revenue per subscriber was $69.82 during the three months ended September
30, 2008 versus $66.01 during the same period in 2007. The $3.81 or 5.8% increase in ARPU was
primarily attributable to (i) price increases in February 2008 on some of our most popular programming packages, (ii) increased
penetration of HD programming driven in part by the availability of HD local channels, (iii) an
increase in hardware related fees, including fees for DVR, (iv) an increase in fees earned from
our DishHOME Protection Plan, and (v) increased advertising revenue. This increase was partially
offset by a decrease in revenues from our original agreement with AT&T.
40
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Continued |
Equipment sales and other revenue. Equipment sales and other revenue totaled $42 million during
the three months ended September 30, 2008, a decrease of $53 million or 56.0% compared to the same
period during 2007. The decrease in Equipment sales and other revenue primarily resulted from
the distribution of our set-top box business and certain other revenue-generating assets to
EchoStar in connection with the Spin-off. During the three months ended September 30, 2007, our
set-top box business that was distributed to EchoStar accounted for $62 million of our Equipment
sales and other revenue.
Equipment sales, transitional services and other revenue EchoStar. Equipment sales,
transitional services and other revenue EchoStar totaled $9 million during the three months
ended September 30, 2008. As previously discussed, Equipment sales, transitional services and
other revenue EchoStar resulted from our transitional services and other agreements with
EchoStar associated with the Spin-off.
Subscriber-related expenses.
Subscriber-related expenses totaled $1.534 billion during the three months ended
September 30, 2008, an increase of $150 million or 10.8% compared to the same period 2007.
The increase in Subscriber-related expenses was primarily attributable to
higher costs for programming content, customer retention, call center operations,
in-home service, and the refurbishment and repair of receiver
systems used in our equipment lease programs. Customer equipment upgrades are
the largest component of our retention activity. Increased upgrades were primarily
driven by customer demand for HD and large capacity DVR receivers, and by our decision
to transmit certain channels exclusively in MPEG-4. We believe the resulting increase
in available satellite bandwidth outweighs the short-term cost of switching out equipment
for some customers, which we expect to continue at least through the first half of 2009.
The increases related to call center operations and in-home service were driven in part
by investments in staffing, training, information systems, and other initiatives.
These investments are intended to help combat inefficiencies introduced by the increasing
complexity of our business and technology, improve customer satisfaction, reduce churn,
increase productivity, and allow us to scale better over the long run. We cannot, however,
be certain that our increased spending will ultimately be successful in yielding such returns.
In the meantime, we may continue to incur higher costs as a result of both our operational
inefficiencies and increased spending. Subscriber-related expenses represented
53.2% and 51.3% of Subscriber-related revenue during the three months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The increase in this expense to
revenue ratio primarily resulted from an increase in the costs mentioned above,
partially offset by an increase in ARPU and a decrease in costs associated with our
original agreement with AT&T.
In the normal course of business, we enter into various contracts with programmers to provide
content. Our programming contracts generally require us to make payments based on the number of
subscribers to which the respective content is provided. Consequently, our programming expenses
will increase to the extent we are successful in growing our subscriber base. In addition, because
programmers continue to raise the price of content, our Subscriber-related expenses as a
percentage of Subscriber-related revenue could materially increase absent corresponding price
increases in our DISH Network programming packages.
Satellite and transmission expenses EchoStar. Satellite and transmission expenses EchoStar
totaled $77 million during the three months ended September 30, 2008. As previously discussed,
Satellite and transmission expenses EchoStar resulted from costs associated with the services
provided to us by EchoStar, including the satellite and transponder capacity leases on satellites
that were distributed to EchoStar in connection with the Spin-off, and digital broadcast operations
previously provided internally at cost. The increase in satellite and transmission expenses for
this leased satellite capacity is offset to some extent by lower depreciation expense as we no
longer recognize depreciation on these satellites which are now owned by EchoStar.
Satellite and transmission expenses other. Satellite and transmission expenses other
totaled $8 million during the three months ended September 30, 2008, a $43 million decrease
compared to the same period in 2007. As previously discussed, prior to the Spin-off, Satellite
and transmission expenses other included costs associated with the operation of our digital
broadcast centers, including satellite uplinking/downlinking, signal processing, conditional access
management, telemetry, tracking and control, satellite and transponder leases, and other related
services. Effective January 1, 2008, these digital broadcast operation services are provided to us
by EchoStar and are included in Satellite and transmission expenses EchoStar.
Satellite and transmission expenses are likely to increase further to the extent we increase the
size of our owned and leased satellite fleet, obtain in-orbit satellite insurance, increase our
leased uplinking capacity and launch additional HD local markets and other new programming
services.
Equipment, transitional services and other cost of sales. Equipment, transitional services and
other cost of sales totaled $69 million during the three months ended September 30, 2008, an
increase of $3 million or 3.9% compared to the same period in 2007. The increase primarily
resulted from charges for obsolete inventory, additional costs related to our transitional services
and other agreements with EchoStar, and an increase in other cost of sales. These increases were
partially offset by the elimination of the cost of sales related to the distribution of our set-top
box business.
41
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Continued |
During the three months ended September 30, 2007, the costs associated with our set-top box
business that was distributed to EchoStar accounted for $38 million of our Equipment, transitional
services and other cost of sales.
Subscriber acquisition costs. Subscriber acquisition costs totaled $438 million for the three
months ended September 30, 2008, an increase of $37 million or 9.3% compared to the same period in
2007. This increase was primarily attributable to an increase in SAC discussed below, partially
offset by the decline in gross new subscribers.
SAC. SAC was $735 during the three months ended September 30, 2008 compared to $646 during the
same period in 2007, an increase of $89, or 13.8%. This increase was primarily attributable to an
increase in the number of DISH Network subscribers selecting higher priced advanced products, such
as HD receivers, DVRs and receivers with multiple tuners, higher acquisition advertising costs and
an increase in promotional incentives paid to our independent retailer network. Additionally, our
equipment costs were higher during the three months ended September 30, 2008 as a result of the
Spin-off of our set-top box business to EchoStar. Set-top boxes were historically designed
in-house and procured at our cost. We now acquire this equipment from EchoStar at its cost plus an
agreed-upon margin. These increases were partially offset by the increase in the redeployment
benefits of our equipment lease program for new subscribers.
During the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, the amount of equipment capitalized
under our lease program for new subscribers totaled approximately $169 million and $184 million,
respectively. This decrease in capital expenditures under our lease program for new subscribers
resulted primarily from lower subscriber growth and an increase in redeployment of equipment
returned by disconnecting lease program subscribers, partially offset by higher equipment costs
resulting from higher priced advanced products and the mark-up on set-top boxes as a result of the
Spin-off, discussed above.
Capital expenditures resulting from our equipment lease program for new subscribers have been, and
we expect will continue to be, partially mitigated by, among other things, the redeployment of
equipment returned by disconnecting lease program subscribers. However, to remain competitive we
will have to upgrade or replace subscriber equipment periodically as technology changes, and the
costs associated with these upgrades may be substantial. To the extent technological changes
render a portion of our existing equipment obsolete, we would be unable to redeploy all returned
equipment and consequently would realize less benefit from the SAC reduction associated with
redeployment of that returned lease equipment.
Our SAC calculation does not reflect any benefit from payments we received in connection with
equipment not returned to us from disconnecting lease subscribers and returned equipment that is
made available for sale rather than being redeployed through our lease program. During the three
months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, these amounts totaled $34 million and $27 million,
respectively.
Several years ago, we began deploying receivers that utilize 8PSK modulation technology and
receivers that utilize MPEG-4 compression technology. These technologies, when fully deployed,
will allow more programming channels to be carried over our existing satellites. A majority of our
customers today, however, do not have receivers that use MPEG-4 compression and a smaller but still
significant percentage do not have receivers that use 8PSK modulation. We may choose to invest
significant capital to accelerate the conversion of customers to MPEG-4 and/or 8PSK in order to
realize the bandwidth benefits sooner. The bandwidth benefits from MPEG-4 and 8PSK can be
independently achieved. In addition, given that most of our HD content is broadcast in MPEG-4 and
8PSK, any growth in HD penetration will naturally accelerate our transition to these newer
technologies and may cause our subscriber acquisition and retention costs to increase. By the end
of 2008, we expect that all new receivers that we purchase from third-party manufacturers will have
MPEG-4 technology, but we will continue to refurbish and redeploy MPEG-2 receivers indefinitely.
Our Subscriber acquisition costs, both in aggregate and on a per new subscriber activation basis,
may materially increase in the future to the extent that we transition to newer technologies,
introduce more aggressive promotions, or provide greater equipment subsidies. See further
discussion under Liquidity and Capital Resources Subscriber Retention and Acquisition Costs.
General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses totaled $148 million
during the three months ended September 30, 2008, a decrease of $4 million or 2.5% compared to the
same period in 2007. This
42
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Continued |
decrease was primarily attributable to the reduction in headcount resulting from the Spin-off,
partially offset by increased administrative costs to support the DISH Network. General and
administrative expenses represented 5.0% and 5.4% of Total revenue during the three months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The decrease in the ratio of the expenses to Total
revenue was primarily attributable to the decrease in expenses as a result of the Spin-off,
discussed previously.
Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense totaled $246 million during
the three months ended September 30, 2008, a decrease of $99 million or 28.6% compared to the same
period in 2007. The decrease in Depreciation and amortization expense was primarily a result of
the distribution to EchoStar of several satellites, uplink and satellite transmission assets, real
estate and other assets in connection with the Spin-off.
Interest income. Interest income totaled $17 million during the three months ended September 30,
2008, a decrease of $20 million compared to the same period in 2007. This decrease principally
resulted from lower total percentage returns earned on our cash and marketable investment
securities during the third quarter of 2008.
Other. Other expense totaled $106 million during the three months ended September 30, 2008, an
increase of $100 million compared to the same period in 2007. This increase primarily resulted
from the $156 million impairment of marketable and non-marketable investment securities, partially
offset by a $53 million gain on the sale of a non-marketable investment during the third quarter of
2008.
Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. EBITDA was $557 million during the
three months ended September 30, 2008, a decrease of $177 million or 24.1% compared to the same
period in 2007. EBITDA for the three months ended September 30, 2008 was negatively impacted by
the $100 million increase in Other expense, discussed above. The following table reconciles
EBITDA to the accompanying financial statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
EBITDA |
|
$ |
557,431 |
|
|
$ |
734,540 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense (income), net |
|
|
85,193 |
|
|
|
59,177 |
|
Income tax provision (benefit), net |
|
|
134,697 |
|
|
|
131,533 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
245,646 |
|
|
|
344,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
91,895 |
|
|
$ |
199,680 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA is not a measure determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States, or GAAP, and should not be considered a substitute for operating income, net
income or any other measure determined in accordance with GAAP. EBITDA is used as a measurement of
operating efficiency and overall financial performance and we believe it to be a helpful measure
for those evaluating companies in the MVPD industry. Conceptually, EBITDA measures the amount of
income generated each period that could be used to service debt, pay taxes and fund capital
expenditures. EBITDA should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of
performance prepared in accordance with GAAP.
Income tax (provision) benefit, net. Our income tax provision was $135 million during the three
months ended September 30, 2008, an increase of $3 million compared to the same period in 2007.
The increase was primarily due to an increase in our effective tax rate, and was partially offset
by a decrease in Income (loss) before income taxes. The increase in our effective tax rate was
primarily due to the establishment of valuation allowances against deferred tax assets related to
the impairment of marketable and non-marketable investment securities, and was
partially offset by reductions in our accrual for uncertain tax positions, which were accounted for
as discrete items and fully recognized during the three months ended September 30, 2008.
Net income (loss). Net income was $92 million during the three months ended September 30, 2008, a
decrease of $108 million compared to $200 million for the same period in 2007. The decrease was
primarily attributable to the changes in revenue and expenses discussed above.
43
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Continued |
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 Compared to the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Variance |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% |
|
Statements of Operations Data |
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subscriber-related revenue |
|
$ |
8,572,163 |
|
|
$ |
7,927,311 |
|
|
$ |
644,852 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
Equipment sales and other revenue |
|
|
95,755 |
|
|
|
272,009 |
|
|
|
(176,254 |
) |
|
|
(64.8 |
) |
Equipment sales, transitional services and other revenue EchoStar |
|
|
28,247 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,247 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
8,696,165 |
|
|
|
8,199,320 |
|
|
|
496,845 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subscriber-related expenses |
|
|
4,402,771 |
|
|
|
4,067,518 |
|
|
|
335,253 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
% of Subscriber-related revenue |
|
|
51.4 |
% |
|
|
51.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Satellite and transmission expenses EchoStar |
|
|
232,798 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
232,798 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
% of Subscriber-related revenue |
|
|
2.7 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Satellite and transmission expenses Other |
|
|
22,890 |
|
|
|
125,931 |
|
|
|
(103,041 |
) |
|
|
(81.8 |
) |
% of Subscriber-related revenue |
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment, transitional services and other cost of sales |
|
|
131,488 |
|
|
|
189,576 |
|
|
|
(58,088 |
) |
|
|
(30.6 |
) |
Subscriber acquisition costs |
|
|
1,184,138 |
|
|
|
1,178,117 |
|
|
|
6,021 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
412,104 |
|
|
|
451,611 |
|
|
|
(39,507 |
) |
|
|
(8.7 |
) |
% of Total revenue |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
766,260 |
|
|
|
1,008,201 |
|
|
|
(241,941 |
) |
|
|
(24.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
7,152,449 |
|
|
|
7,020,954 |
|
|
|
131,495 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
1,543,716 |
|
|
|
1,178,366 |
|
|
|
365,350 |
|
|
|
31.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income (Expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
44,082 |
|
|
|
98,917 |
|
|
|
(54,835 |
) |
|
|
(55.4 |
) |
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized |
|
|
(284,845 |
) |
|
|
(312,413 |
) |
|
|
27,568 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
Other |
|
|
(124,583 |
) |
|
|
(24,099 |
) |
|
|
(100,484 |
) |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense) |
|
|
(365,346 |
) |
|
|
(237,595 |
) |
|
|
(127,751 |
) |
|
|
(53.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
1,178,370 |
|
|
|
940,771 |
|
|
|
237,599 |
|
|
|
25.3 |
|
Income tax (provision) benefit, net |
|
|
(492,007 |
) |
|
|
(359,752 |
) |
|
|
(132,255 |
) |
|
|
(36.8 |
) |
Effective tax rate |
|
|
41.8 |
% |
|
|
38.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
686,363 |
|
|
$ |
581,019 |
|
|
$ |
105,344 |
|
|
|
18.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DISH Network subscribers, as of period end (in millions) |
|
|
13.780 |
|
|
|
13.695 |
|
|
|
0.085 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
DISH Network subscriber additions, gross (in millions) |
|
|
2.308 |
|
|
|
2.644 |
|
|
|
(0.336 |
) |
|
|
(12.7 |
) |
DISH Network subscriber additions, net (in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.590 |
|
|
|
(0.590 |
) |
|
|
(100.0 |
) |
Average monthly subscriber churn rate |
|
|
1.86 |
% |
|
|
1.70 |
% |
|
|
0.16 |
% |
|
|
9.4 |
|
Average monthly revenue per subscriber (ARPU) |
|
$ |
69.04 |
|
|
$ |
65.42 |
|
|
$ |
3.62 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
Average subscriber acquisition cost per subscriber (SAC) |
|
$ |
715 |
|
|
$ |
652 |
|
|
$ |
63 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
|
EBITDA |
|
$ |
2,185,393 |
|
|
$ |
2,162,468 |
|
|
$ |
22,925 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
44
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Continued |
DISH Network subscribers. DISH Network added approximately 2.308 million gross new subscribers for
the nine months ended September 30, 2008, compared to approximately 2.644 million gross new
subscribers during the same period in 2007. There was no net subscriber growth for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008, compared to approximately 590,000 net subscribers added during the same
period in 2007. This decrease primarily resulted from the decrease in gross new subscribers
discussed above, an increase in our subscriber churn rate, and churn on a larger subscriber base.
Our percentage monthly subscriber churn for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was 1.86%,
compared to 1.70% for the same period in 2007.
Subscriber-related revenue. DISH Network Subscriber-related revenue totaled $8.572 billion for
the nine months ended September 30, 2008, an increase of $645 million or 8.1% compared to the same
period in 2007. This increase was directly attributable to DISH Network subscriber growth and the
increase in ARPU discussed below.
ARPU. Monthly average revenue per subscriber was $69.04 during the nine months ended September 30,
2008 versus $65.42 during the same period in 2007. The $3.62 or 5.5% increase in ARPU was
primarily attributable to (i) price increases in February 2008 and 2007 on some of our most popular programming packages, (ii)
increased penetration of HD programming driven in part by the availability of HD local channels,
(iii) an increase in hardware related fees, including fees for DVR, (iv) an increase in fees earned
from our DishHOME Protection Plan, and (v) increased advertising revenue. This increase was
partially offset by a decrease in revenues from our original agreement with AT&T.
Equipment sales and other revenue. Equipment sales and other revenue totaled $96 million during
the nine months ended September 30, 2008, a decrease of $176 million or 64.8% compared to the same
period during 2007. The decrease in Equipment sales and other revenue primarily resulted from
the distribution of our set-top box business and certain other revenue-generating assets to
EchoStar in connection with the Spin-off. During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, our
set-top box business that was distributed to EchoStar accounted for $165 million of our Equipment
sales and other revenue.
Equipment sales, transitional services and other revenue EchoStar. Equipment sales,
transitional services and other revenue EchoStar totaled $28 million during the nine months
ended September 30, 2008. As previously discussed, Equipment sales, transitional services and
other revenue EchoStar resulted from our transitional services and other agreements with
EchoStar associated with the Spin-off.
Subscriber-related expenses.
Subscriber-related expenses totaled $4.403 billion during the nine months ended
September 30, 2008, an increase of $335 million or 8.2% compared to the same period in 2007.
The increase in Subscriber-related expenses was primarily attributable to higher
costs for programming content, customer retention, call center operations, in-home service
and the refurbishment and repair of receiver systems used in our equipment lease programs.
Customer equipment upgrades are the largest component of our retention activity. Increased
upgrades were primarily driven by customer demand for HD and large capacity DVR receivers,
and by our decision to transmit certain channels exclusively in MPEG-4. We believe the
resulting increase in available satellite bandwidth outweighs the short-term cost of
switching out equipment for some customers, which we expect to continue at least through
the first half of 2009. The increases related to call center operations and in-home service
were driven in part by investments in staffing, training, information systems, and other
initiatives. These investments are intended to help combat inefficiencies introduced by
the increasing complexity of our business and technology, improve customer satisfaction,
reduce churn, increase productivity, and allow us to scale better over the long run.
We cannot, however, be certain that our increased spending will ultimately be successful
in yielding such returns. In the meantime, we may continue to incur higher costs as a
result of both our operational inefficiencies and increased spending. Subscriber-related
expenses represented 51.4% and 51.3% of Subscriber-related revenue during
the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The increase in this
expense to revenue ratio primarily resulted from an increase in the costs mentioned
above, partially offset by an increase in ARPU and a decrease in costs associated with
our original agreement with AT&T.
Satellite and transmission expenses EchoStar. Satellite and transmission expenses EchoStar
totaled $233 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2008. As previously discussed,
Satellite and transmission expenses EchoStar resulted from costs associated with the services
provided to us by EchoStar, including the satellite and transponder capacity leases on satellites
that were distributed to EchoStar in connection with the Spin-off, and digital broadcast operations
previously provided internally at cost. The increase in satellite and transmission expenses for
this leased satellite capacity is offset to some extent by lower depreciation expense as we no
longer recognize depreciation on these satellites which are now owned by EchoStar.
Satellite and transmission expenses other. Satellite and transmission expenses other
totaled $23 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2008, a $103 million decrease
compared to the same period in 2007. As previously discussed, prior to the Spin-off, Satellite
and transmission expenses other included costs associated with the operation of our digital
broadcast centers, including satellite uplinking/downlinking, signal processing, conditional access
management, telemetry, tracking and control, satellite and transponder leases, and other related
services.
45
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Continued |
Effective January 1, 2008, these digital broadcast operation services are provided to us by
EchoStar and are included in Satellite and transmission expenses EchoStar.
Equipment, transitional services and other cost of sales. Equipment, transitional services and
other cost of sales totaled $131 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2008, a
decrease of $58 million or 30.6% compared to the same period in 2007. The decrease primarily
resulted from the elimination of the cost of sales related to the distribution of our set-top box
business to EchoStar in connection with the Spin-off, partially offset by additional costs related
to our transitional services and other agreements with EchoStar, charges for obsolete inventory,
and an increase in other cost of sales. During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, the costs
associated with our set-top box business that was distributed to EchoStar accounted for $106
million of our Equipment, transitional services and other cost of sales.
Subscriber acquisition costs. Subscriber acquisition costs totaled $1.184 billion for the nine
months ended September 30, 2008, an increase of $6 million or 0.5% compared to the same period in
2007. This increase was primarily attributable to an increase in SAC discussed below, partially
offset by the decline in gross new subscribers.
SAC. SAC was $715 during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to $652 during the same
period in 2007, an increase of $63, or 9.7%. This increase was primarily attributable to an
increase in the number of DISH Network subscribers selecting higher priced advanced products, such
as HD receivers, DVRs and receivers with multiple tuners, higher acquisition advertising expense
and an increase in promotional incentives paid to our independent retailer network. Additionally,
our equipment costs were higher during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 as a result of the
Spin-off of our set-top box business to EchoStar. Set-top boxes were historically designed
in-house and procured at our cost. We now acquire this equipment from EchoStar at its cost plus an
agreed-upon margin. These increases were partially offset by the increase in the redeployment
benefits of our equipment lease program for new subscribers.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, the amount of equipment capitalized under
our lease program for new subscribers totaled $467 million and $545 million, respectively. This
decrease in capital expenditures under our lease program for new subscribers resulted primarily
from lower subscriber growth and an increase in redeployment of equipment returned by disconnecting
lease program subscribers, partially offset by higher equipment costs resulting from higher priced
advanced products and the mark-up on set-top boxes as a result of the Spin-off, discussed above.
Our SAC calculation does not reflect any benefit from payments we received in connection with
equipment not returned to us from disconnecting lease subscribers and returned equipment that is
made available for sale rather than being redeployed through our lease program. During the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, these amounts totaled $96 million and $63 million,
respectively.
General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses totaled $412 million
during the nine months ended September 30, 2008, a decrease of $40 million or 8.7% compared to the
same period in 2007. This decrease was primarily attributable to the reduction in headcount
resulting from the Spin-off, partially offset by increased administrative costs to support the DISH
Network. General and administrative expenses represented 4.7% and 5.5% of Total revenue during
the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The decrease in the ratio of the
expenses to Total revenue was primarily attributable to the decrease in expenses as a result of
the Spin-off, discussed previously.
Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense totaled $766 million during
the nine months ended September 30, 2008, a decrease of $242 million or 24.0% compared to the same
period in 2007. The decrease in Depreciation and amortization expense was primarily a result of
several satellites, uplink and satellite transmission assets, real estate and other assets
distributed to EchoStar in connection with the Spin-off and the write-off of costs associated with
discontinued software development projects in 2007.
Interest income. Interest income totaled $44 million during the nine months ended September 30,
2008, a decrease of $55 million compared to the same period in 2007. This decrease principally
resulted from lower total percentage
returns earned on our cash and marketable investment securities and lower average cash and
marketable investment securities balances, compared to the same period in 2007.
46
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Continued |
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized. Interest expense totaled $285 million during the
nine months ended September 30, 2008, a decrease of $28 million or 8.8% compared to the same period
in 2007. This decrease primarily resulted from the reduction in interest expense associated with
the 2007 debt redemption and the contribution of satellite capital leases to EchoStar in connection
with the Spin-off, offset by an increase in interest expense related to the issuance of debt during
2008.
Other. Other expense totaled $125 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2008, an
increase of $100 million compared to the same period in 2007. This increase primarily resulted
from the $169 million impairment of marketable and non-marketable investment securities, partially
offset by a $53 million gain on the sale of a non-marketable investment.
Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. EBITDA was $2.185 billion during
the nine months ended September 30, 2008, an increase of $23 million or 1.1% compared to the same
period in 2007. EBITDA for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was negatively impacted by the
$100 million increase in Other expense discussed above. The following table reconciles EBITDA to
the accompanying financial statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
EBITDA |
|
$ |
2,185,393 |
|
|
$ |
2,162,468 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense (income), net |
|
|
240,763 |
|
|
|
213,496 |
|
Income tax provision (benefit), net |
|
|
492,007 |
|
|
|
359,752 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
766,260 |
|
|
|
1,008,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
686,363 |
|
|
$ |
581,019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA is not a measure determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States, or GAAP, and should not be considered a substitute for operating income, net
income or any other measure determined in accordance with GAAP. EBITDA is used as a measurement of
operating efficiency and overall financial performance and we believe it to be a helpful measure
for those evaluating companies in the MVPD industry. Conceptually, EBITDA measures the amount of
income generated each period that could be used to service debt, pay taxes and fund capital
expenditures. EBITDA should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of
performance prepared in accordance with GAAP.
Income tax (provision) benefit, net. Our income tax provision was $492 million during the nine
months ended September 30, 2008, an increase of $132 million compared to the same period in 2007. The
increase was primarily due to an increase in Income (loss) before income taxes and our effective
tax rate. The increase in our effective tax rate was primarily due to the establishment of
valuation allowances against deferred tax assets related to the impairment of marketable and
non-marketable investment securities, and was partially offset by reductions in our accrual for
uncertain tax positions, which were accounted for as discrete items and fully recognized during the
nine months ended September 30, 2008.
Net income (loss). Net income was $686 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2008, an
increase of $105 million compared to $581 million for the same period in 2007. The increase was
primarily attributable to the changes in revenue and expenses discussed above.
47
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Continued |
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash and Cash Equivalents and Marketable Investment Securities
We consider all liquid investments purchased within 90 days of their maturity to be cash
equivalents. See Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk for
further discussion regarding our marketable investment securities. Our restricted and unrestricted
cash, cash equivalents and marketable investment securities as of September 30, 2008 totaled $1.713
billion, including $180 million of restricted cash and marketable investment securities, compared
to $2.961 billion, including $173 million of restricted cash and marketable investment securities
as of December 31, 2007. The $1.248 billion decrease in restricted and unrestricted cash, cash
equivalents and marketable investment securities was primarily related to (i) the contribution of
approximately $1.5 billion of cash, cash equivalents and marketable investment securities to
EchoStar in connection with the Spin-off, (ii) payments totaling $712 million relating to our 700
MHz wireless spectrum acquisition, (iii) the redemption of our $500 million 3% Subordinated
Convertible Note due 2010, and (iv) the repurchases of 3.1 million shares of our Class A common
stock for $82 million, partially offset by the issuance of debt during 2008 and the cash flow
generated from operations. Subsequent to September 30, 2008, we redeemed the remaining balance of
$972 million of our 5 3/4% Senior Notes due 2008, as previously discussed, and approximately $105
million of restricted cash was released from an escrow account to Tivo.
We have investments in various
debt and equity instruments including corporate bonds, corporate equity securities,
government bonds, and VRDNs. VRDNs are long-term floating rate municipal bonds with
embedded put options that allow the bondholder to sell the security at par plus accrued
interest. All of the put options are secured by a pledged liquidity source. While they
are classified as marketable investment securities, VRDNs can be liquidated per the put
option on a same day or on a five business day settlement basis. As of September 30, 2008
and December 31, 2007, we held VRDNs with fair values of $113 million and $261 million,
respectively.
We also have invested in auction rate securities (ARS) and mortgage backed securities (MBS),
which are classified as available-for-sale securities and reported at fair value. Recent events in
the credit markets have reduced or eliminated current liquidity for certain of our ARS and MBS
investments. The fair values of these securities are estimated utilizing a combination of
comparable instruments and liquidity assumptions. These analyses consider, among other items, the
collateral underlying the investments, credit ratings, and liquidity. These securities were also
compared, when possible, to other observable market data with similar characteristics.
For our ARS and MBS investments, due to the lack of observable market quotes for identical assets,
we utilize analyses that rely on Level 2 and/or Level 3 inputs. These inputs include observed
prices on similar assets as well as our assumptions and estimates related to the counterparty
credit quality, default risk underlying the security and overall capital market liquidity. The
valuation of our ARS and MBS investments portfolio is subject to uncertainties that are difficult
to estimate.
As of September 30, 2008, $75 million, net of tax, of unrealized losses were included in
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, as
the result of the dislocation in the credit markets and temporary declines in the fair value for
our ARS investments. We have established a full valuation allowance for the deferred tax assets
associated with these capital losses. In addition, we continue to classify these investments
totaling $92 million as noncurrent assets as we intend to hold these investments until they recover
or mature.
As of September 30, 2008, $16 million, net of tax, of unrealized losses were included in
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, as a
result of the dislocation in the credit markets and temporary declines in the fair value for our
MBS investments. We have established a full valuation allowance for the tax asset associated with
this capital loss. In addition, we continue to classify a portion of these investments totaling $8
million as noncurrent assets as we intend to hold these investments until they recover or mature.
We made a $712 million deposit for 700 MHz wireless licenses in an FCC auction. The FCC has not
yet issued the licenses. We will be required to make significant additional investments or partner
with others to commercialize these licenses and satisfy FCC build-out requirements.
48
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Continued |
The following discussion highlights our free cash flow and cash flow activities during the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007.
Free Cash Flow
We define free cash flow as Net cash flows from operating activities less Purchases of property
and equipment, as shown on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. We believe free
cash flow is an important liquidity metric because it measures, during a given period, the amount
of cash generated that is available to repay debt obligations, make investments, fund acquisitions
and for certain other activities. Free cash flow is not a measure determined in accordance with
GAAP and should not be considered a substitute for Operating income, Net income, Net cash
flows from operating activities or any other measure determined in accordance with GAAP. Since
free cash flow includes investments in operating assets, we believe this non-GAAP liquidity measure
is useful in addition to the most directly comparable GAAP measure Net cash flows from operating
activities.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, free cash flow was significantly impacted
by changes in operating assets and liabilities as shown in the Net cash flows from operating
activities section of our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows included herein.
Operating asset and liability balances can fluctuate significantly from period to period and there
can be no assurance that free cash flow will not be negatively impacted by material changes in
operating assets and liabilities in future periods, since these changes depend upon, among other
things, managements timing of payments and control of inventory levels and cash receipts. In
addition to fluctuations resulting from changes in operating assets and liabilities, free cash flow
can vary significantly from period to period depending upon, among other things, subscriber growth,
subscriber revenue, subscriber churn, subscriber acquisition costs, including amounts capitalized
under our equipment lease programs, operating efficiencies, increases or decreases in purchases of
property and equipment and other factors. Given the increasingly competitive nature of our
industry, it may not be possible to reduce churn without significantly increasing our spending on
customer retention, which would negatively affect our earnings and free cash flow. In addition,
our subscriber acquisition costs and SAC may materially increase or our ARPU may temporarily
decrease to the extent that we introduce more aggressive subsidies or programming promotions in the
future if we determine they are necessary to respond to competition, or for other reasons.
The following table reconciles free cash flow to Net cash flows from operating activities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Free cash flow |
|
$ |
981,122 |
|
|
$ |
826,622 |
|
Add back: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
844,265 |
|
|
|
1,070,033 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows from operating activities |
|
$ |
1,825,387 |
|
|
$ |
1,896,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The $155 million increase in free cash flow during the nine months ended September 30, 2008
compared to the same period in 2007 resulted from a decrease in Purchases of property and
equipment of $226 million, or 21.1%, partially offset by a decrease in Net cash flows from
operating activities of $71 million, or 3.8%.
The decrease in Purchases of property and equipment during the nine months ended September 30,
2008 compared to the same period in 2007 was primarily attributable to a decline in expenditures
for satellite construction, and to a lesser extent a decline in overall corporate capital
expenditures. Our future capital expenditures could increase or decrease depending on the strength
of the economy, strategic opportunities or other factors. The decrease in Net cash flows from
operating activities was primarily attributable to a decline in net income of $174 million,
adjusted to exclude non-cash changes in Depreciation and amortization expense, Deferred tax
expense (benefit) and Realized and unrealized losses (gains) on investments, partially offset by
an increase in cash resulting from changes in operating
assets and liabilities of $109 million. This increase in cash resulting from the changes in
operating assets and liabilities includes a $420 million increase in net amounts payable to
EchoStar, partially offset by a decrease in other accounts payable of $267 million and an increase
in current assets of $52 million.
49
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Continued |
During the second quarter of 2008, we exhausted our federal net operating losses and currently pay
cash taxes to the U.S. Government at the statutory rate of 35% of taxable income.
Subscriber Turnover
DISH Network lost approximately 10,000 net subscribers for the three months ended September 30,
2008, compared to adding approximately 110,000 net new subscribers during the same period in 2007.
This decrease primarily resulted from the decrease in gross new subscribers, an increase in our
subscriber churn rate, and churn on a larger subscriber base, as discussed in Results of
Operations above.
Our distribution relationship with AT&T has been a substantial contributor to our gross and net
subscriber additions over the past several years, accounting for approximately 17% of our gross
subscriber additions for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. This distribution relationship
will terminate on January 31, 2009. It may be difficult for us to develop alternative distribution
channels that will fully replace AT&T and if we are unable to do so, our gross and net subscriber
additions may be impaired, our churn may increase, and our results of operations may be adversely
affected. In addition, approximately 1 million of our current subscribers were acquired through
our distribution relationship with AT&T and these subscribers have historically churned at a higher
rate than our overall subscriber base. Although AT&T is not permitted to target these subscribers
for transition to another pay-TV service and AT&T and we are required to maintain bundled billing
and cooperative customer service for these subscribers, we may still experience churn of these
subscribers following termination of the AT&T distribution relationship.
Satellites
Operation of our subscription television service requires that we have adequate satellite
transmission capacity for the programming we offer. Moreover, current competitive conditions
require that we continue to expand our offering of new programming, particularly by launching more
HD local markets and offering more HD national channels. While we generally have had in-orbit
satellite capacity sufficient to transmit our existing channels and some backup capacity to recover
the transmission of certain critical programming, our backup capacity is limited. In the event of
a failure or loss of any of our satellites, we may need to acquire or lease additional satellite
capacity or relocate one of our other satellites and use it as a replacement for the failed or lost
satellite. Such a failure could result in a prolonged loss of critical programming or a
significant delay in our plans to expand programming as necessary to remain competitive and cause
us to expend a significant portion of our cash to acquire or lease additional satellite capacity.
Security Systems
Increases in theft of our signal, or our competitors signals, could in addition to reducing new
subscriber activations, also cause subscriber churn to increase. We use microchips embedded in
credit card-sized access cards, called smart cards, or security chips in our receiver systems to
control access to authorized programming content. However, our signal encryption has been
compromised, and even though we continue to respond to compromises of our encryption system with
security measures intended to make signal theft of our programming more difficult, theft of our
signal is increasing. We cannot assure you that we will be successful in reducing or controlling
theft of our service. During 2005, we replaced our smart cards in order to reduce theft of our
service. However, the smart card replacement did not fully secure our system, and we have since
implemented software patches and other security measures to help protect our service.
Nevertheless, these security measures are short-term fixes and we remain susceptible to additional
signal theft. During the third quarter 2008, we began implementing a plan to replace our existing
smart cards to re-secure our system, which is expected to take approximately nine to twelve months
to complete. While our existing smart cards installed in 2005 remain under warranty, we could
incur operational period costs in excess of $50 million in connection with our smart card
replacement program.
50
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Continued |
Stock Repurchases
Our board of directors previously authorized stock repurchases of up to $1.0 billion of our Class A
common stock. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, we repurchased 3.1
million shares of our common stock for $82 million. In November 2008, our board of directors
extended the plan and authorized an increase in the maximum dollar value of shares that may be
repurchased under the plan, such that we are currently authorized to repurchase up to $1.0 billion
of our outstanding shares through and including December 31, 2009.
Subscriber Acquisition and Retention Costs
Our subscriber acquisition and retention costs can vary significantly from period to period which
can in turn cause significant variability to our Net income (loss) and Free cash flow between
periods. Our Subscriber acquisition costs, SAC and Subscriber-related expenses may materially
increase to the extent that we introduce more aggressive promotions in the future if we determine
they are necessary to respond to competition, or for other reasons.
Capital expenditures resulting from our equipment lease program for new subscribers have been, and
we expect will continue to be, partially mitigated by, among other things, the redeployment of
equipment returned by disconnecting lease program subscribers. However, to remain competitive we
will have to upgrade or replace subscriber equipment periodically as technology changes, and the
associated costs may be substantial. To the extent technological changes render a portion of our
existing equipment obsolete, we would be unable to redeploy all returned equipment and would
realize less benefit from the SAC reduction associated with redeployment of that returned lease
equipment.
Several years ago, we began deploying receivers that utilize 8PSK modulation technology and
receivers that utilize MPEG-4 compression technology. These technologies, when fully deployed,
will allow more programming channels to be carried over our existing satellites. A majority of our
customers today, however, do not have receivers that use MPEG-4 compression and a smaller but still
significant percentage do not have receivers that use 8PSK modulation. We may choose to invest
significant capital to accelerate the conversion of customers to MPEG-4 and/or 8PSK in order to
realize the bandwidth benefits sooner. The bandwidth benefits from MPEG-4 and 8PSK can be
independently achieved. In addition, given that most of our HD content is broadcast in MPEG-4 and
8PSK, any growth in HD penetration will naturally accelerate our transition to these newer
technologies and may cause our subscriber acquisition and retention costs to increase. By the end
of 2008, we expect that all new receivers that we purchase from third-party manufacturers will have
MPEG-4 technology, but we will continue to refurbish and redeploy MPEG-2 receivers indefinitely.
While we may be able to generate increased revenue from such conversions, the deployment of
equipment including new technologies will increase the cost of our consumer equipment, at least in
the short-term. Our expensed and capitalized subscriber acquisition and retention costs will
increase to the extent we subsidize those costs for new and existing subscribers. These increases
may be mitigated to the extent we successfully redeploy existing receivers and implement other
equipment cost reduction strategies.
In an effort to reduce subscriber turnover, we offer existing subscribers a variety of options for
upgraded and add on equipment. We generally lease receivers and subsidize installation of receiver
systems under these subscriber retention programs. As discussed above, we will have to upgrade or
replace subscriber equipment periodically as technology changes. As a consequence, our retention
costs, which are included in Subscriber-related expenses, and our capital expenditures related to
our equipment lease program for existing subscribers, will increase, at least in the short-term, to
the extent we subsidize the costs of those upgrades and replacements. Our capital expenditures
related to subscriber retention programs could also increase in the future to the extent we
increase penetration of our equipment lease program for existing subscribers, if we introduce other
more aggressive promotions, if we offer existing subscribers more aggressive promotions for HD
receivers or receivers with other enhanced technologies, or for other reasons.
51
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Continued |
Cash necessary to fund retention programs and total subscriber acquisition costs are expected to be
satisfied from existing cash and marketable investment securities balances and cash generated from
operations to the extent available. We may, however, decide to raise additional capital in the
future to meet these requirements. There can be no assurance that additional financing will be
available on acceptable terms, or at all, if needed in the future.
Obligations and Future Capital Requirements
Future maturities of our contractual obligations as of September 30, 2008 are summarized as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due by period |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Long-term debt obligations |
|
$ |
5,746,555 |
|
|
$ |
971,555 |
|
|
$ |
25,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
500,000 |
|
|
$ |
3,250,000 |
|
Satellite-related obligations |
|
|
923,941 |
|
|
|
96,947 |
|
|
|
123,744 |
|
|
|
75,894 |
|
|
|
52,044 |
|
|
|
52,044 |
|
|
|
52,044 |
|
|
|
471,224 |
|
Capital lease obligations |
|
|
187,481 |
|
|
|
2,015 |
|
|
|
8,445 |
|
|
|
9,097 |
|
|
|
9,800 |
|
|
|
10,556 |
|
|
|
11,371 |
|
|
|
136,197 |
|
Operating lease obligations |
|
|
104,600 |
|
|
|
10,986 |
|
|
|
40,153 |
|
|
|
19,567 |
|
|
|
13,743 |
|
|
|
7,731 |
|
|
|
4,546 |
|
|
|
7,874 |
|
Purchase obligations |
|
|
1,500,077 |
|
|
|
1,159,827 |
|
|
|
246,749 |
|
|
|
43,651 |
|
|
|
14,859 |
|
|
|
15,334 |
|
|
|
15,827 |
|
|
|
3,830 |
|
Mortgages and other notes payable |
|
|
47,051 |
|
|
|
840 |
|
|
|
4,102 |
|
|
|
4,140 |
|
|
|
4,372 |
|
|
|
4,619 |
|
|
|
4,180 |
|
|
|
24,798 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
8,509,705 |
|
|
$ |
2,242,170 |
|
|
$ |
448,193 |
|
|
$ |
152,349 |
|
|
$ |
1,094,818 |
|
|
$ |
90,284 |
|
|
$ |
587,968 |
|
|
$ |
3,893,923 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The table above does not include $137 million of liabilities associated with unrecognized tax
benefits which were accrued under the provisions of FIN 48, previously discussed, and are included
on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2008. Of this amount, it is
reasonably possible that $103 million may be paid or settled within the next twelve
months.
We expect that our future working capital, capital expenditure and debt service requirements will
be satisfied from existing cash and marketable investment securities balances, cash generated from
operations or through new additional capital. However, current dislocations in the credit markets,
which have significantly impacted the availability and pricing of financing, particularly in the
high yield debt and leveraged credit markets, may significantly constrain our ability to obtain
financing to fund our working capital, capital expenditure and debt service requirements and
support our growth initiatives. These developments in the credit markets may have a significant
effect on our cost of financing and our liquidity position and may, as a result, also cause us to
defer or abandon profitable new business strategies that we would otherwise pursue if financing were
available on acceptable terms.
Our ability to generate positive future operating and net cash flows is dependent upon, among other
things, our ability to retain existing DISH Network subscribers. There can be no assurance we will
be successful in executing our business plan. The amount of capital required to fund our future
working capital and capital expenditure needs will vary, depending on, among other things, the rate
at which we acquire new subscribers and the cost of subscriber acquisition and retention, including
capitalized costs associated with our new and existing subscriber equipment lease programs. The
amount of capital required will also depend on the levels of investment necessary to support
possible strategic initiatives including our plans to expand our national and local HD offering.
Our capital expenditures will vary depending on the number of satellites leased or under
construction at any point in time. Our working capital and capital expenditure requirements could
increase materially in the event of, among other factors, increased competition for subscription
television customers, significant satellite failures, or general economic downturn. These factors
could require that we raise additional capital in the future. There can be no assurance that we
could raise all required capital or that required capital would be available on acceptable terms.
From time to time we evaluate opportunities for strategic investments or acquisitions that may
complement our current services and products, enhance our technical capabilities, improve or
sustain our competitive position, or otherwise offer growth opportunities. We may make
investments in or partner with others to expand our business into mobile and portable video, data
and voice services. Future material investments or acquisitions may require that we obtain
additional capital, assume third party debt or other long-term obligations. There can be no
assurance that we could raise all required capital or that required capital would be available on
acceptable terms.
52
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Continued |
Interest on Long-Term Debt
As of September 30, 2008, expected future cash interest payments related to our debt are summarized
in the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due by period |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Long-term debt |
|
$ |
2,084,958 |
|
|
$ |
141,333 |
|
|
$ |
330,500 |
|
|
$ |
330,000 |
|
|
$ |
330,000 |
|
|
$ |
266,250 |
|
|
$ |
266,250 |
|
|
$ |
420,625 |
|
Capital lease obligations |
|
|
111,299 |
|
|
|
3,484 |
|
|
|
13,551 |
|
|
|
12,899 |
|
|
|
12,197 |
|
|
|
11,440 |
|
|
|
10,625 |
|
|
|
47,103 |
|
Mortgages and other notes payable |
|
|
19,539 |
|
|
|
798 |
|
|
|
2,872 |
|
|
|
2,554 |
|
|
|
2,322 |
|
|
|
2,075 |
|
|
|
1,814 |
|
|
|
7,104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,215,796 |
|
|
$ |
145,615 |
|
|
$ |
346,923 |
|
|
$ |
345,453 |
|
|
$ |
344,519 |
|
|
$ |
279,765 |
|
|
$ |
278,689 |
|
|
$ |
474,832 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53
Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Market Risks Associated With Financial Instruments
As of September 30, 2008, our restricted and unrestricted cash, cash equivalents and marketable
investment securities had a fair value of $1.713 billion. Of that amount, a total of $1.654
billion was invested in: (a) cash; (b) debt instruments of the U.S. Government and its agencies;
(c) commercial paper and corporate notes with an overall average maturity of less than one year and
rated in one of the four highest rating categories by at least two nationally recognized
statistical rating organizations; (d) instruments with similar risk, duration and credit quality
characteristics to the commercial paper described above; and (e) auction rate securities (ARS),
mortgage-backed securities (MBS) and asset-backed securities. The primary purpose of these
investing activities has been to preserve principal until the cash is required to, among other
things, fund operations, make strategic investments and expand the business. Consequently, the
size of this portfolio fluctuates significantly as cash is received and used in our business.
At September 30, 2008, all of the $1.654 billion was invested in fixed or variable rate
instruments. The value of these investments can be impacted by interest rate fluctuations, but
while an increase in interest rates would ordinarily adversely impact the fair value of fixed and
variable rate investments, we normally hold these investments to maturity. Further, the value
could be lowered by credit losses should economic conditions worsen, as discussed below.
Consequently, neither interest rate fluctuations nor other market risks typically result in
significant realized gains or losses to this portfolio.
Our restricted and unrestricted cash, cash equivalents and marketable investment securities had an
average annual return for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 of 3.2%. A decrease in interest
rates does have the effect of reducing our future annual interest income from this portfolio, since
funds would be re-invested at lower rates as the instruments mature. A hypothetical 10% decrease
in interest rates would result in a decrease of approximately $6 million in annual interest income.
Investments in Debt and Equity Securities
We have investments in various debt and equity instruments including
corporate bonds, corporate equity securities, government bonds, and VRDNs.
VRDNs are long-term floating rate municipal bonds with embedded put options
that allow the bondholder to sell the security at par plus accrued interest.
All of the put options are secured by a pledged liquidity source. While they
are classified as marketable investment securities, VRDNs can be liquidated per
the put option on a same day or on a five business day settlement basis. As of
September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, we held VRDNs with fair values of $113 million
and $261 million, respectively.
We also have invested in ARS and MBS, which are classified as available-for-sale securities and
reported at fair value. Recent events in the credit markets have reduced or eliminated current
liquidity for certain of our ARS and MBS investments. The fair values of these securities are
estimated utilizing a combination of comparable instruments and liquidity assumptions. These
analyses consider, among other items, the collateral underlying the investments, credit ratings,
and liquidity. These securities were also compared, when possible, to other observable market data
with similar characteristics.
For our ARS and MBS investments, due to the lack of observable market quotes for identical assets,
we utilize analyses that rely on Level 2 and/or Level 3 inputs. These inputs include observed
prices on similar assets as well as our assumptions and estimates related to the counterparty
credit quality, default risk underlying the security and overall capital market liquidity. The
valuation of our ARS and MBS investments portfolio is subject to uncertainties that are difficult
to estimate.
As of September 30, 2008, $75 million, net of tax, of unrealized losses were included in
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, as
the result of the dislocation in the credit markets and temporary declines in the fair value for
our ARS investments. We have established a full valuation allowance for the deferred tax assets
associated with these capital losses. In addition, we continue to
classify these investments totaling $92 million as noncurrent assets as we intend to hold these
investments until they recover or mature.
54
Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK Continued
As of September 30, 2008, $16 million, net of tax, of unrealized losses were included in
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, as a
result of the dislocation in the credit markets and temporary declines in the fair value for our
MBS investments. We have established a full valuation allowance for the tax asset associated with
this capital loss. In addition, we continue to classify a portion of these investments totaling $8
million as noncurrent assets as we intend to hold these investments until they recover or mature.
Marketable and Non-Marketable Investment Securities
Included in our marketable investment securities portfolio balance is debt and equity of public
companies we hold for strategic and financial purposes. As of September 30, 2008, we held
strategic and financial debt and equity investments of public companies with a fair value of $54
million. A significant portion of these investments are highly speculative and consist of
securities of a single issuer and the value of that portfolio therefore depends on the value of
that issuer. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, our strategic investments
experienced volatility, which is likely to continue. The fair value of our strategic and financial
debt and equity investments can be significantly impacted by the risk of adverse changes in
securities markets, as well as risks related to the performance of the companies whose securities
we have invested in, risks associated with specific industries, and other factors. These
investments are subject to significant fluctuations in fair value due to the volatility of the
securities markets and of the underlying businesses. A hypothetical 10% adverse change in the
price of our public strategic debt and equity investments would result in approximately a $5
million decrease in the fair value of that portfolio.
We currently classify all marketable investment securities as available-for-sale. We adjust the
carrying value of our available-for-sale securities to fair value and report the related temporary
unrealized gains and losses as a separate component of Accumulated other comprehensive income
(loss) within Total stockholders equity (deficit), net of related deferred income tax.
Declines in the fair value of a marketable investment security which are estimated to be other
than temporary are recognized in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, thus
establishing a new cost basis for such investment. We evaluate our marketable investment
securities portfolio on a quarterly basis to determine whether declines in the fair value of these
securities are other than temporary. This quarterly evaluation consists of reviewing, among other
things, the fair value of our marketable investment securities compared to the carrying amount, the
historical volatility of the price of each security and any market and company specific factors
related to each security. Generally, absent specific factors to the contrary, declines in the fair
value of investments below cost basis for a continuous period of less than six months are
considered to be temporary. Declines in the fair value of investments for a continuous period of
six to nine months are evaluated on a case by case basis to determine whether any company or
market-specific factors exist which would indicate that such declines are other than temporary.
Declines in the fair value of investments below cost basis for a continuous period greater than
nine months are considered other than temporary and are recorded as charges to earnings, absent
specific factors to the contrary.
As of September 30, 2008, we had accumulated unrealized losses net of related tax effect of $100
million as a part of Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) within Total stockholders
equity (deficit). During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, in accordance with our
impairment policy, we recorded $148 million and $4 million in charges to earnings for other than
temporary declines in the fair value of our marketable and non-marketable investment securities,
respectively. In addition, during the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we recognized realized
net gains on the sale of marketable investment securities of $3 million.
Our strategic marketable investment securities are highly speculative and have experienced and
continue to experience volatility. As of September 30, 2008, a significant portion of our
strategic investment portfolio consisted of securities of a single issuer and the value of that
portfolio therefore depends on the value of that issuer. If the fair value of our strategic
marketable investment securities portfolio does not remain above cost basis or if we become aware
of any market or company specific factors that indicate that the carrying value of certain of our
securities is impaired, we may be required to record charges to earnings in future periods equal to
the amount of the decline in fair value. During October 2008, the value of our strategic
marketable investment securities of $54 million declined in excess of 40%.
55
Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK Continued
Other Investment Securities
We also have several strategic investments in certain equity securities which are included in
Other noncurrent assets, net on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Our other investment
securities consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
Other Investment Securities |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Cost method |
|
$ |
15,794 |
|
Equity method |
|
|
30,179 |
|
Fair value method |
|
|
4,155 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
50,128 |
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in other investment securities as of September 30, 2008 primarily resulted from the
distribution of assets to EchoStar in connection with the Spin-off. In addition, during the nine
months ended September 30, 2008, we recorded a $53 million gain on the sale of one of our
non-marketable investment securities.
Generally, we account for our unconsolidated equity investments under either the equity method or
cost method of accounting. Because these equity securities are generally not publicly traded, it
is not practical to regularly estimate the fair value of the investments; however, these
investments are subject to an evaluation for other than temporary impairment on a quarterly basis.
This quarterly evaluation consists of reviewing, among other things, company business plans and
current financial statements, if available, for factors that may indicate an impairment of our
investment. Such factors may include, but are not limited to, cash flow concerns, material
litigation, violations of debt covenants and changes in business strategy. The fair value of these
equity investments is not estimated unless there are identified changes in circumstances that may
indicate an impairment exists and these changes are likely to have a significant adverse effect on
the fair value of the investment.
We also have a strategic investment in non-public preferred stock, public common stock and
convertible debt of a foreign public company. The debt, which is convertible into the issuers
publicly traded common shares, is accounted for under the fair value method with changes in fair
value reported each period as unrealized gains or losses in Other income or expense in our
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. We estimate the fair value of the convertible
debt using certain assumptions and judgments in applying a discounted cash flow analysis and the
Black-Scholes option pricing model including the fair market value of the underlying common stock
price as of that date. During 2006, we converted a portion of the convertible debt to public
common shares and determined that we have the ability to significantly influence the operating
decisions of the issuer. Consequently, we account for the common share component of this
investment under the equity method of accounting. As a result of our change to equity method
accounting, we evaluate the common share component of this investment on a quarterly basis to
determine whether there has been a decline in the value that is other than temporary. Because the
shares are publicly traded, this quarterly evaluation considers the fair market value of the common
shares in addition to the other factors described above for equity and cost method investments.
When impairments occur related to our foreign investments, any Cumulative translation adjustment
associated with these investments will remain in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
within Total stockholders equity (deficit) on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets until
the investments are sold or otherwise liquidated; at which time, they will be released into our
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations.
56
Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK Continued
The changes in the fair value and impairments of our other investment securities consist of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine |
|
|
|
Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
Other Investment Securities |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Cost and equity method investments impairments |
|
$ |
(16,673 |
) |
Fair value method investments unrealized gains (losses), net |
|
|
(7,249 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(23,922 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Our ability to realize value from our strategic investments in companies that are not publicly
traded depends on the success of those companies businesses and their ability to obtain sufficient
capital to execute their business plans. Because private markets are not as liquid as public
markets, there is also increased risk that we will not be able to sell these investments, or that
when we desire to sell them we will not be able to obtain fair value for them.
Fixed Rate Debt, Mortgages and Other Notes Payable
As of September 30, 2008, we had fixed-rate debt, mortgages and other notes payable of $5.794
billion on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. We estimated the fair value of this debt to
be approximately $5.043 billion using quoted market prices for our publicly traded debt, which
constitutes approximately 99% of our debt, and an analysis based on certain assumptions discussed
below for our private debt. In completing our analysis for our private debt, we evaluate market
conditions, related securities, various public and private offerings, and other publicly available
information. In performing this analysis, we make various assumptions regarding credit spreads,
volatility, and the impact of these factors on the value of the notes. The fair value of our debt
is affected by fluctuations in interest rates. A hypothetical 10% decrease in assumed interest
rates would increase the fair value of our debt by approximately $198 million. To the extent
interest rates increase, our costs of financing would increase at such time as we are required to
refinance our debt. As of September 30, 2008, a hypothetical 10% increase in assumed interest
rates would increase our annual interest expense by approximately $39 million.
Derivative Financial Instruments
In general, we do not use derivative financial instruments for hedging or speculative purposes, but
we may do so in the future.
Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end
of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of
the end of the period covered by this report.
There has been no change in our
internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934) during our most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
57
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Separation Agreement
In connection with the Spin-off, we have entered into a separation agreement with EchoStar, which
provides for, among other things, the division of liability resulting from litigation. Under the
terms of the separation agreement, EchoStar has assumed liability for any acts or omissions that
relate to its business whether such acts or omissions occurred before or after the Spin-off.
Certain exceptions are provided, including for intellectual property related claims generally,
whereby EchoStar will only be liable for its acts or omissions that occurred following the
Spin-off. Therefore, we have indemnified EchoStar for any potential liability or damages
resulting from intellectual property claims relating to the period prior to the effective date of
the Spin-off.
Acacia
During 2004, Acacia Media Technologies (Acacia) filed a lawsuit against us in the United States
District Court for the Northern District of California. The suit also named DirecTV, Comcast,
Charter, Cox and a number of smaller cable companies as defendants. Acacia is an intellectual
property holding company which seeks to license an acquired patent portfolio. The suit alleges
infringement of United States Patent Nos. 5,132,992 (the 992 patent), 5,253,275 (the 275 patent),
5,550,863 (the 863 patent), 6,002,720 (the 720 patent) and 6,144,702 (the 702 patent).
The patents relate to certain systems and methods for transmission of digital data. During 2004
and 2005, the Court issued Markman rulings which found that the 992 and 702 patents were not as
broad as Acacia had contended, and that certain terms in the 702 patent were indefinite. The
Court issued additional claim construction rulings on December 14, 2006, March 2, 2007, October 19,
2007, and February 13, 2008. On March 12, 2008, the Court issued an order outlining a schedule for
filing dispositive invalidity motions based on its claim constructions. Acacia has agreed to
stipulate to invalidity based on the Courts claim constructions in order to proceed immediately to
the Federal Circuit on appeal. The Court, however, has permitted us to file additional invalidity
motions.
Acacias various patent infringement cases have been consolidated for pre-trial purposes in the
United States District Court for the Northern District of California. We intend to vigorously
defend this case. In the event that a Court ultimately determines that we infringe any of the
patents, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages and/or an
injunction that could require us to materially modify certain user-friendly features that we
currently offer to consumers. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the
suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Broadcast Innovation, L.L.C.
In 2001, Broadcast Innovation, L.L.C. (Broadcast Innovation) filed a lawsuit against us, DirecTV,
Thomson Consumer Electronics and others in Federal District Court in Denver, Colorado. The suit
alleges infringement of United States Patent Nos. 6,076,094 (the 094 patent) and 4,992,066 (the
066 patent). The 094 patent relates to certain methods and devices for transmitting and
receiving data along with specific formatting information for the data. The 066 patent relates to
certain methods and devices for providing the scrambling circuitry for a pay television system on
removable cards. We examined these patents and believe that they are not infringed by any of our
products or services. Subsequently, DirecTV and Thomson settled with Broadcast Innovation leaving
us as the only defendant.
During 2004, the judge issued an order finding the 066 patent invalid. Also in 2004, the Court
ruled the 094 patent invalid in a parallel case filed by Broadcast Innovation against Charter and
Comcast. In 2005, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit overturned the 094
patent finding of invalidity and remanded the case back to the District Court. During June 2006,
Charter filed a reexamination request with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. The
Court has stayed the case pending reexamination. Our case remains stayed pending resolution of the
Charter case.
58
PART II OTHER INFORMATION Continued
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a Court ultimately determines that we
infringe any of the patents, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble
damages and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain user-friendly
features that we currently offer to consumers. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the
outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Channel Bundling Class Action
On September 21, 2007, a purported class of cable and satellite subscribers filed an antitrust
action against us in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The
suit also names as defendants DirecTV, Comcast, Cablevision, Cox, Charter, Time Warner, Inc., Time
Warner Cable, NBC Universal, Viacom, Fox Entertainment Group, and Walt Disney Company. The suit
alleges, among other things, that the defendants engaged in a conspiracy to provide customers with
access only to bundled channel offerings as opposed to giving customers the ability to purchase
channels on an a la carte basis. We filed a motion to dismiss, which the Court denied in July
2008. We intend to vigorously defend this case. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty
the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Datasec
During April 2008, Datasec Corporation (Datasec) sued us and DirecTV Corporation in the United
States District Court for the Central District of California, alleging infringement of U.S.
Patent No. 6,075,969 (the 969 patent). The 969 patent was issued in 2000 to inventor Bruce
Lusignan, and is entitled Method for Receiving Signals from a Constellation of Satellites in
Close Geosynchronous Orbit. In September 2008, Datasec voluntarily dismissed its case without
prejudice.
Distant Network Litigation
During October 2006, a District Court in Florida entered a permanent nationwide injunction
prohibiting us from offering distant network channels to consumers effective December 1, 2006.
Distant networks are ABC, NBC, CBS and Fox network channels which originate outside the community
where the consumer who wants to view them, lives. We have turned off all of our distant network
channels and are no longer in the distant network business. Termination of these channels resulted
in, among other things, a small reduction in average monthly revenue per subscriber and free cash
flow, and a temporary increase in subscriber churn. The plaintiffs in that litigation allege that
we are in violation of the Courts injunction and have appealed a District Court decision finding
that we are not in violation. On July 7, 2008, the Eleventh Circuit rejected the plaintiffs
appeal and affirmed the decision of the District Court.
Enron Commercial Paper Investment
During October 2001, we received approximately $40 million from the sale of Enron commercial paper
to a third party broker. That commercial paper was ultimately purchased by Enron. During November
2003, an action was commenced in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of
New York against approximately 100 defendants, including us, who invested in Enrons commercial
paper. The complaint alleges that Enrons October 2001 purchase of its commercial paper was a
fraudulent conveyance and voidable preference under bankruptcy laws. We dispute these allegations.
We typically invest in commercial paper and notes which are rated in one of the four highest
rating categories by at least two nationally recognized statistical rating organizations. At the
time of our investment in Enron commercial paper, it was considered to be high quality and low
risk. We intend to vigorously defend this case. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty
the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Finisar Corporation
Finisar Corporation (Finisar) obtained a $100 million verdict in the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas against DirecTV for patent infringement. Finisar alleged that
DirecTVs electronic program guide and other elements of its system infringe United States Patent
No. 5,404,505 (the 505 patent).
59
PART II OTHER INFORMATION Continued
In July 2006, we, together with NagraStar LLC, filed a Complaint for Declaratory Judgment in the
United States District Court for the District of Delaware against Finisar that asks the Court to
declare that they and we do not infringe, and have not infringed, any valid claim of the 505
patent. Trial is not currently scheduled. The District Court has stayed our action until the
Federal Circuit has resolved DirecTVs appeal. During April 2008, the Federal Circuit reversed the
judgment against DirecTV and ordered a new trial. We are evaluating the Federal Circuits decision
to determine the impact on our action.
We intend to vigorously prosecute this case. In the event that a Court ultimately determines that
we infringe this patent, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages
and/or an injunction that could require us to modify our system architecture. We cannot predict
with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential
liability or damages.
Global Communications
On April 19, 2007, Global Communications, Inc. (Global) filed a patent infringement action
against us in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. The suit alleges
infringement of United States Patent No. 6,947,702 (the 702 patent). This patent, which involves
satellite reception, was issued in September 2005. On October 24, 2007, the United States Patent
and Trademark Office granted our request for reexamination of the 702 patent and issued an Office
Action finding that all of the claims of the 702 patent were invalid. At the request of the
parties, the District Court stayed the litigation until the reexamination proceeding is concluded
and/or other Global patent applications issue. We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the
event that a Court ultimately determines that we infringe the 702 patent, we may be subject to
substantial damages, which may include treble damages and/or an injunction that could require us to
materially modify certain user-friendly features that we currently offer to consumers. We cannot
predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any
potential liability or damages.
Katz Communications
On June 21, 2007, Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing, L.P. (Katz) filed a patent infringement
action against us in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The
suit alleges infringement of 19 patents owned by Katz. The patents relate to interactive voice
response, or IVR, technology. We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a Court
ultimately determines that we infringe any of the asserted patents, we may be subject to
substantial damages, which may include treble damages and/or an injunction that could require us to
materially modify certain user-friendly features that we currently offer to consumers. We cannot
predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any
potential liability or damages.
Personalized Media Communications
In February 2008, Personalized Media Communications, Inc. filed suit against us, EchoStar and
Motorola, Inc. in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas alleging
infringement of United States Patent Nos. 4,694,490 (the 490 patent), 5,109,414 (the 414
patent), 4,965,825 (the 825 patent), 5,233,654 (the 654 patent), 5,335,277 (the 277 patent),
and 5,887,243 (the 243 patent), all of which were issued to John Harvey and James Cuddihy as
named inventors. The 490 patent, the 414 patent, the 825 patent, the 654 patent and the 277
patent are defined as the Harvey Patents. The Harvey Patents are entitled Signal Processing
Apparatus and Methods. The lawsuit alleges, among other things, that our DBS system receives
program content at broadcast reception and satellite uplinking facilities and transmits such
program content, via satellite, to remote satellite
60
PART II OTHER INFORMATION Continued
receivers. The lawsuit further alleges that we infringe the Harvey Patents by transmitting and
using a DBS signal specifically encoded to enable the subject receivers to function in a manner
that infringes the Harvey Patents, and by selling services via DBS transmission processes which
infringe the Harvey Patents.
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a Court ultimately determines that we
infringe any of the asserted patents, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include
treble damages and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain
user-friendly features that we currently offer to consumers. We cannot predict with any degree of
certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Retailer Class Actions
During 2000, lawsuits were filed by retailers in Colorado state and federal court attempting to
certify nationwide classes on behalf of certain of our retailers. The plaintiffs are requesting
the Courts declare certain provisions of, and changes to, alleged agreements between us and the
retailers invalid and unenforceable, and to award damages for lost incentives and payments, charge
backs, and other compensation. We have asserted a variety of counterclaims. The federal court
action has been stayed during the pendency of the state court action. We filed a motion for
summary judgment on all counts and against all plaintiffs. The plaintiffs filed a motion for
additional time to conduct discovery to enable them to respond to our motion. The Court granted
limited discovery which ended during 2004. The plaintiffs claimed we did not provide adequate
disclosure during the discovery process. The Court agreed, and denied our motion for summary
judgment as a result. The final impact of the Courts ruling cannot be fully assessed at this
time. During April 2008, the Court granted plaintiffs class certification motion. Trial has been
set for April 2009. We intend to vigorously defend this case. We cannot predict with any degree
of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Superguide
During 2000, Superguide Corp. (Superguide) filed suit against us, DirecTV, Thomson and others in
the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, Asheville Division,
alleging infringement of United States Patent Nos. 5,038,211 (the 211 patent), 5,293,357 (the 357
patent) and 4,751,578 (the 578 patent) which relate to certain electronic program guide functions,
including the use of electronic program guides to control VCRs. Superguide sought injunctive and
declaratory relief and damages in an unspecified amount. In October 2008, we reached a settlement
with Superguide which did not have a material impact on our results of operations.
Tivo Inc.
On January 31, 2008, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed in part and
reversed in part the April 2006 jury verdict concluding that certain of our digital video
recorders, or DVRs, infringed a patent held by Tivo. In its decision, the Federal Circuit affirmed
the jurys verdict of infringement on Tivos software claims, upheld the award of damages from
the District Court, and ordered that the stay of the District Courts injunction against us, which
was issued pending appeal, will dissolve when the appeal becomes final. The Federal Circuit,
however, found that we did not literally infringe Tivos hardware claims, and remanded such
claims back to the District Court for further proceedings. On October 6, 2008, the Supreme Court
denied our petition for certiorari. As a result, approximately $105 million was released from an
escrow account to Tivo.
In addition, we have developed and deployed next-generation DVR software to our customers DVRs.
This improved software is fully operational and has been automatically downloaded to current
customers (our alternative technology). We have formal legal opinions from outside counsel that
conclude that our alternative technology does not infringe, literally or under the doctrine of
equivalents, either the hardware or software claims of Tivos patent. Tivo has filed a motion for
contempt alleging that we are in violation of the Courts injunction. We have vigorously opposed
the motion arguing that the Courts injunction does not apply to DVRs that have received our
alternative technology, that our alternative technology does not infringe Tivos patent, and that
we are in compliance with the injunction. A hearing was held on Tivos motion for contempt on
September 4, 2008 and we are waiting for a decision from the District Court.
61
PART II OTHER INFORMATION Continued
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 5, Accounting for
Contingencies (SFAS 5), we recorded a total reserve of $132 million on our Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets to reflect the jury verdict, supplemental damages and pre-judgment
interest awarded by the Texas court. This amount also includes the estimated cost of any software
infringement prior to implementation of our alternative technology, plus interest subsequent to the
jury verdict.
If we are unsuccessful in defending against Tivos motion for contempt or any subsequent claim that
our alternative technology infringes Tivos patent, we could be prohibited from distributing DVRs
or could be required to modify or eliminate certain user-friendly DVR features that we currently
offer to consumers. In that event we would be at a significant disadvantage to our competitors who
could offer this functionality and, while we would attempt to provide that functionality through
other manufacturers, the adverse affect on our business could be material. We could also have to
pay substantial additional damages.
Voom
On May 28, 2008, Voom HD Holdings (Voom) filed a complaint against us in New York Supreme Court.
The suit alleges breach of contract arising from our termination of the affiliation agreement we
had with Voom for the carriage of certain Voom HD channels on DISH Network. In January 2008, Voom
sought a preliminary injunction to prevent us from terminating the agreement. The Court denied
Vooms motion, finding, among other things, that Voom was not likely to prevail on the merits of
its case. Voom is claiming over $1.0 billion in damages. We intend to vigorously defend this
case. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the
extent of any potential liability or damages.
Other
In addition to the above actions, we are subject to various other legal proceedings and claims
which arise in the ordinary course of business. In our opinion, the amount of ultimate liability
with respect to any of these actions is unlikely to materially affect our financial position,
results of operations or liquidity.
62
PART II OTHER INFORMATION Continued
Item 1A. RISK FACTORS
Item 1A, Risk Factors, of our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for 2007 includes a detailed
discussion of our risk factors. The information presented below updates, and should be read in
conjunction with, the risk factors and information disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A
for 2007.
AT&Ts termination of its distribution agreement with us may reduce subscriber additions and
increase churn.
Our distribution relationship with AT&T has been a substantial contributor to our gross and net
subscriber additions over the past several years, accounting for approximately 17% of our gross
subscriber additions for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. This distribution relationship
will terminate on January 31, 2009. It may be difficult for us to develop alternative distribution
channels that will fully replace AT&T and if we are unable to do so, our gross and net subscriber
additions may be impaired, our churn may increase, and our results of operations may be adversely
affected. In addition, approximately 1 million of our current subscribers were acquired through
our distribution relationship with AT&T and these subscribers have historically churned at a higher
rate than our overall subscriber base. Although AT&T is not permitted to target these subscribers
for transition to another pay-TV service and AT&T and we are required to maintain bundled billing
and cooperative customer service for these subscribers, we may still experience churn of these
subscribers following termination of the AT&T distribution relationship.
If we fail to improve our operational efficiency and customer satisfaction, our business could be
materially and adversely affected.
We have made and we will continue to make material investments in staffing, training, information
systems, and other initiatives, primarily in our call center and
in-home service businesses. These investments are intended to help combat inefficiencies introduced by the increasing
complexity of our business and technology, improve customer satisfaction, reduce churn, increase
productivity, and allow us to scale better over the long run. We cannot, however, be certain that
our increased spending will ultimately be successful in yielding such returns. In the meantime, we
may continue to incur higher costs as a result of both our operational inefficiencies and increased
spending.
Our operating results may be adversely affected by weakening economic conditions, including the
recent downturn in the financial markets.
Our ability to grow or maintain our business may be adversely affected by weakening global or
domestic economic conditions, wavering consumer confidence, unemployment, tight credit markets,
declines in global and domestic stock markets, falling home prices and other factors adversely
affecting the global and domestic economy. Unfavorable events in the economy, including a further
deterioration in the credit and equity markets, could significantly affect consumer demand for our
pay-TV services as consumers may delay purchasing decisions or reduce or reallocate their
discretionary spending.
In addition, financial markets in the United States have been extremely volatile in recent months.
As a result of concerns about the stability of the markets generally, many lenders and
institutional investors have reduced and, in some cases, ceased to provide funding to borrowers
such as us. Furthermore, the recent reduction in our stock price combined with the instability in
the equity markets has made it difficult for us to raise equity financing without incurring
substantial dilution to our existing shareholders. These conditions make it difficult for us to
accurately forecast and plan future business activities because we may not have access to funding
sources necessary for us to pursue organic and strategic business development opportunities.
We currently depend on EchoStar for a substantial portion of our satellite services and
substantially all of our digital broadcast operations.
EchoStar is currently our key provider of transponder leasing and our sole provider of digital
broadcast operation services. These services are provided pursuant to contracts that generally
expire on January 1, 2010. While we have certain rights to renew digital broadcast operation
services, EchoStar will have no obligation to provide us transponder leasing after that date.
Therefore, if we are unable to extend these contracts on similar terms with
63
PART II OTHER INFORMATION Continued
EchoStar, or we are unable to obtain similar contracts from third parties after that date, there
could be a significant adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial
position.
We have made a substantial investment in 700 MHz wireless licenses and will be required to make
significant additional investments to commercialize these licenses.
We made a $712 million deposit for 700 MHz wireless licenses in an FCC auction. The FCC has not
yet issued the licenses. We will be required to make significant additional investments or partner
with others to commercialize these licenses and satisfy FCC build-out requirements.
We expect to invest significant additional amounts to develop services and infrastructure to
effectively utilize the spectrum and provide services to our customers. We will also need to
comply with the technical and operational rules and regulations adopted by the FCC for this
spectrum, including specific build-out requirements. Part or all of our licenses can be terminated
for failure to satisfy these requirements. Specifically, we will be required to meet interim
build-out benchmarks by February 17, 2013. Failure to meet an interim benchmark requirement will
cause a two year reduction in our license term (from 10 years to 8 years) and may result in
enforcement action, including forfeitures, and the loss of right to operate in any unserved areas.
There can be no assurance that we will be able to develop and implement a business model that will
realize a return on these investments and profitably deploy the spectrum represented by the 700 MHz
licenses.
Furthermore, the fair values of wireless licenses may vary significantly in the future. In
particular, valuation swings could occur if:
|
|
|
consolidation in the wireless industry allows or requires wireless carriers to sell
significant portions of their wireless spectrum holdings, which could in turn reduce the
value of our spectrum holdings; or |
|
|
|
|
a sudden large sale of spectrum by one or more wireless providers occurs. |
In addition, the fair value of wireless licenses could decline as a result of the FCCs pursuit of
policies, including auctions, designed to increase the number of wireless licenses available in
each of our markets. If the fair value of our 700 MHz licenses were to decline significantly, the
value of our 700 MHz licenses could be subject to non-cash impairment charges. We assess potential
impairments to our indefinite-lived intangible assets, including our 700 MHz licenses annually to
determine whether there is evidence that events or changes in circumstances indicate that an
impairment condition may exist. Estimates of the fair value of our 700 MHz licenses are based
primarily on available market prices, including successful bid prices in FCC auctions and selling
prices observed in wireless license transactions.
A portion of our short-term investment portfolio is invested in asset backed securities, auction
rate securities, mortgage backed securities and special investment vehicles and as a result a
portion of our portfolio has restricted liquidity. If the credit ratings of these securities we
hold further deteriorate or the lack of liquidity in the marketplace becomes prolonged, we may be
required to further adjust the carrying value of these investments through an impairment charge.
A portion of our investment portfolio is invested in asset backed securities, auction rate
securities, mortgage backed securities and special investment vehicles. The markets associated
with these investments have experienced greatly reduced liquidity in recent months and therefore
have adversely affected our liquidity. Should the credit ratings of these securities further
deteriorate, we may be required to record further impairment charges.
We may be required to raise and refinance indebtedness during unfavorable market conditions.
Our business plans may require that we raise additional debt to capitalize on our business
opportunities. Recent developments in the financial markets have made it more difficult for
issuers of high yield indebtedness such as us to access capital markets at reasonable interest
rates. We cannot predict with any certainty whether or not we will be impacted in the future by
the current adverse credit market conditions which may adversely affect our ability to refinance
our indebtedness or to secure additional financing to support our growth initiatives.
64
PART II OTHER INFORMATION Continued
We have limited satellite capacity and satellite failures or launch delays could adversely affect
our business.
Operation of our subscription television service requires that we have adequate satellite
transmission capacity for the programming we offer. Moreover, current competitive conditions
require that we continue to expand our offering of new programming, particularly by launching more
HD local markets and offering more HD national channels. While we generally have had in-orbit
satellite capacity sufficient to transmit our existing channels and some backup capacity to recover
the transmission of certain critical programming, our backup capacity is limited.
In the event of a failure or loss of any of our satellites, we may need to acquire or lease
additional satellite capacity or relocate one of our other satellites and use it as a replacement
for the failed or lost satellite. Such a failure could result in a prolonged loss of critical
programming or a significant delay in our plans to expand programming as necessary to remain
competitive and thus have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
results of operations. For instance, our EchoStar II satellite experienced a failure that rendered
the satellite a total loss. EchoStar II had been operating from the 148 degree orbital location
primarily as a back-up satellite, but had provided local network channel service to Alaska and six
other small markets. As a result of this failure we had to relocate all programming and other
services previously broadcast from EchoStar II to Echostar I, the primary satellite at the 148
degree location.
We are subject to digital HD carry-one-carry-all requirements that will cause capacity
constraints.
In order to provide any full-power analog local broadcast signal in any market today, we are
required to retransmit all qualifying analog broadcast signals in that market
(carry-one-carry-all). The digital transition in February 2009 will require all full-power
broadcasters to cease transmission using analog signals and switch over to digital signals. The
switch to digital will provide broadcasters significantly greater capacity to provide high
definition and multi-cast programming. During March 2008, the FCC adopted new digital carriage
rules that require DBS providers to phase in carry-one-carry-all obligations with respect to the
carriage of full-power broadcasters HD signals by February 2013. The carriage of additional HD
signals on our DBS system could cause us to experience significant capacity constraints and limit
the number of local markets that we can serve. The digital transition will also require
resource-intensive efforts by us to transition broadcast signals switching from analog to digital
at the hundreds of local facilities we utilize across the nation to receive local channels and
transmit them to our uplink facilities.
In addition, the FCC is now considering whether to require DBS providers to carry broadcast
stations in both standard definition and high definition starting in 2010, in conjunction with the
phased-in HD carry-one, carry-all requirements adopted by the FCC. If we were required to carry
multiple versions of each broadcast station, we would have to dedicate more of our finite satellite
capacity to each broadcast station, which may force us to reduce the number of local markets served
and limit our ability to meet competitive needs. We cannot predict the outcome or timing of that
proceeding.
65
PART II OTHER INFORMATION Continued
Item 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The following table provides information regarding purchases of our Class A common stock from July
1, 2008 through September 30, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Approximate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
Dollar Value of |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as |
|
|
Shares that May Yet |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Part of Publicly |
|
|
be Purchased Under |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Price Paid |
|
|
Announced Plans or |
|
|
the Plans or |
|
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
|
per Share |
|
|
Programs |
|
|
Programs (a) |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share data) |
|
|
|
|
July 1 - July 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,000,000 |
|
August 1 - August 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,000,000 |
|
September 1 - September 30,
2008 |
|
|
3,054,115 |
|
|
$ |
26.82 |
|
|
|
3,054,115 |
|
|
$ |
918,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
3,054,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,054,115 |
|
|
$ |
918,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Our board of directors authorized the purchase of up to $1.0 billion of our Class A common
stock on August 9, 2004. Prior to 2007, we purchased a total of 13.6 million shares of our
Class A common stock for $374 million under this plan. During November 2007, our board of
directors authorized an increase in the plan, such that we were authorized to repurchase up to
an aggregate of $1.0 billion of our outstanding shares through and including December 31,
2008. In September 2008, we repurchased 3.1 million shares of our Class A common stock for
$82 million under this plan. In November 2008, our board of directors extended the plan and
authorized an increase in the maximum dollar value of shares that may be repurchased under the
plan, such that we are currently authorized to repurchase up to $1.0 billion of our
outstanding shares through and including December 31, 2009. Purchases under the program may
be made through open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions, or Rule 10b5-1
trading plans, subject to market conditions and other factors. We may elect not to purchase
all of shares authorized for repurchase under this program and we may also enter into
additional share repurchase programs authorized by our board of directors. |
66
PART II OTHER INFORMATION Continued
Item 6. EXHIBITS
(a) Exhibits.
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1o |
|
|
Section 302 Certification by Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2o |
|
|
Section 302 Certification by Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1o |
|
|
Section 906 Certification by Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2o |
|
|
Section 906 Certification by Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
99.1o |
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Receiver Agreement dated December 31, 2007 between EchoSphere
L.L.C. and EchoStar Technologies L.L.C. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
99.2o |
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Broadcast Agreement dated December 31, 2007 between EchoStar
and EchoStar Satellite L.L.C. |
67
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Charles W. Ergen
|
|
|
|
Charles W. Ergen |
|
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(Duly Authorized Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Bernard L. Han
|
|
|
|
Bernard L. Han |
|
Date: November 10, 2008 |
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
68