e10vk
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark one)
|
|
|
þ |
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 001-12209
RANGE RESOURCES CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
34-1312571 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(IRS Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
100 Throckmorton Street, Suite 1200, Fort Worth, Texas
|
|
76102 |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code
(817) 870-2601
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered |
|
|
|
Common Stock, $.01 par value
|
|
New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant as a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule
405 of the Securities Act.
Yes
þ No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section
13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation
S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.
See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ |
|
Accelerated filer o |
|
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in 12b-2 of the
Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates
as of June 30, 2008 was $9,963,751,000. This amount is based on the closing price of registrants
common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on that date. Shares of common stock held by executive
officers and directors of the registrant are not included in the computation. However, the
registrant has made no determination that such individuals are affiliates within the meaning of
Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933.
As
of February 19, 2009, there were 156,206,315 shares of Range Resources Corporation Common
Stock outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrants proxy statement to be furnished to stockholders in connection
with its 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference in Part III, Items 10-14
of this report.
RANGE RESOURCES CORPORATION
Unless the context otherwise indicates, all references in this report to Range, we, us
or our are to Range Resources Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiaries and its ownership
interests in equity method investees. Unless otherwise noted, all information in the report
relating to oil and gas reserves and the estimated future net cash flows attributable to those
reserves are based on estimates and are net to our interest. If you are not familiar with the oil
and gas terms used in this report, please refer to the explanation of such terms under the caption
Glossary of Certain Defined Terms at the end of Item 15 of this report.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
i
RANGE RESOURCES CORPORATION
Annual Report on Form 10-K
Year Ended December 31, 2008
Disclosures Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
Certain information included in this report, other materials filed or to be filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC), as well as information included in oral statements
or other written statements made or to be made by us, contain or incorporate by reference certain
statements (other than statements of historical fact) that constitute forward-looking statements
within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934. When used herein, the words budget, budgeted, assumes, should,
goal, anticipates, expects, believes, seeks, plans, estimates, intends, projects
or targets and similar expressions that convey the uncertainty of future events or outcomes are
intended to identify forward-looking statements. Where any forward-looking statement includes a
statement of the assumptions or bases underlying such forward-looking statement, we caution that
while we believe these assumptions or bases to be reasonable and to be made in good faith, assumed
facts or bases almost always vary from actual results and the difference between assumed facts or
bases and the actual results could be material, depending on the circumstances. It is important to
note that our actual results could differ materially from those projected by such forward-looking
statements. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements
are reasonable and such forward-looking statements are based on the best data available at the date
this report is filed with the SEC, we cannot assure you that such expectations will prove correct.
Factors that could cause our results to differ materially from the results discussed in such
forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the following: the factors listed in
Item 1A of this report under the heading Risk Factors, production variance from expectations,
volatility of oil and gas prices, hedging results, the need to develop and replace reserves, the
substantial capital expenditures required to fund operations, exploration risks, environmental
risks, uncertainties about estimates of reserves, competition, litigation, government regulation,
political risks, our ability to implement our business strategy, costs and results of drilling new
projects, mechanical and other inherent risks associated with oil and gas production, weather,
availability of drilling equipment and changes in interest rates. All such forward-looking
statements in this document are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements
in this paragraph, and we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking
statements.
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
General
We are a Fort Worth, Texas-based independent oil and gas company, engaged in the exploration,
development and acquisition of oil and gas properties, primarily in the Southwestern, Appalachian
and Gulf Coast regions of the United States. We were incorporated in 1980 under the name Lomak
Petroleum, Inc. and, later that year, we completed an initial public offering and began trading on
the NASDAQ. In 1996, our common stock was listed on the New York Stock Exchange. In 1998, we
changed our name to Range Resources Corporation. In 1999, we implemented a strategy of internally
generated drillbit growth coupled with complementary acquisitions. Our objective is to build
stockholder value through consistent growth in reserves and production on a cost-efficient basis.
During the past five years, we have increased our proved reserves 288% (from 684.5 Bcfe in 2003 to
2.654 Tcfe in 2008), while production has increased 143% (from 58,053 Mmcfe in 2003 to 141,145
Mmcfe in 2008) during that same period.
At year-end 2008, our proved reserves had the following characteristics:
|
|
|
2.7 Tcfe of proved reserves; |
|
|
|
|
83% natural gas; |
|
|
|
|
62% proved developed; |
|
|
|
|
77% operated; |
|
|
|
|
a reserve life of 17.9 years (based on fourth quarter 2008 production); |
|
|
|
|
a pre-tax present value of $3.4 billion of future net cash flows attributable to our
reserves, discounted at 10% per annum (PV-10); and |
|
|
|
|
a standardized after-tax measure of discounted future net cash flows of $2.6
billion. |
1
PV-10 may be considered a non-GAAP financial measure as defined by the SEC. We believe that
the presentation of PV-10 is relevant and useful to our investors as supplemental disclosure to the
standardized measure, or after-tax amount, because it presents the discounted future net cash flows
attributable to our proved reserves before taking into account future corporate income taxes and
our current tax structure. While the standardized measure is dependent on the unique tax situation
of each company, PV-10 is based on prices and discount factors that are consistent for all
companies. Because of this, PV-10 can be used within the industry and by creditors and securities
analysts to evaluate estimated net cash flows from proved reserves on a more comparable basis. The
difference between the standardized measure and the PV-10 amount is discounted estimated future
income tax of $819.0 million at December 31, 2008.
At year-end 2008, we owned 3,694,000 gross (2,952,000 net) acres of leasehold, including
407,800 acres where we also own the royalty interest. We have built a multi-year drilling
inventory that is estimated to contain over 12,000 drilling locations.
Our corporate offices are located at 100 Throckmorton Street, Suite 1200, Fort Worth, Texas
76102. Our telephone number is (817)
870-2601.
Business Strategy
Our objective is to build stockholder value through consistent growth in reserves and
production on a cost-efficient basis. Our strategy is to employ internally generated drillbit
growth coupled with complementary acquisitions. Our strategy requires us to make significant
investments in technical staff, acreage and seismic data and technology to build drilling
inventory. Our strategy has the following principal elements:
|
|
|
Concentrate in Core Operating Areas. We currently operate in three regions: the
Southwestern (which includes the Barnett Shale of North Central Texas, the Permian
Basin of West Texas and eastern New Mexico, the East Texas Basin, the Texas Panhandle
and the Anadarko Basin of Western Oklahoma), Appalachian (which includes tight-gas,
shale, coal bed methane and conventional oil and gas production in Pennsylvania,
Virginia, Ohio, New York and West Virginia) and the Gulf Coast (which includes Texas,
Louisiana and Mississippi). Concentrating our drilling and producing activities in
these core areas allows us to develop the regional expertise needed to interpret
specific geological and operating trends and develop economies of scale. Operating in
multiple core areas allows us to blend the production characteristics of each area to
balance our portfolio toward our goal of consistent production and reserve growth. |
|
|
|
|
Focus on cost efficiency. We continue to concentrate in our core areas which we
believe to have sizeable hydrocarbon deposits in place that will allow us to
consistently increase production while controlling costs. As there is little long-term
competitive sales price advantage available to a commodity producer,
the costs to find,
develop, and produce a commodity are important to organizational sustainability and
long-term shareholder value creation. We endeavor to control costs such that our cost
to find, develop and produce oil and gas is among the best performing quartile of our
peer group. |
|
|
|
|
Maintain Multi-Year Drilling Inventory. We focus on areas where multiple
prospective productive horizons and development opportunities exist. We use our
technical expertise to build and maintain a multi-year drilling inventory. A large,
multi-year inventory of drilling projects increases our ability to consistently grow
production and reserves. Currently, we have over 12,000 identified drilling locations
in inventory. In 2008, we drilled 634 gross (490.2 net) wells. |
|
|
|
|
Maintain Long Life, Low Decline Reserve Base. Long life, low decline oil and gas
reserves provide a more stable growth platform than short life, high decline reserves.
Long life reserves reduce reinvestment risk as they lessen the amount of reinvestment
capital deployed each year to replace production. Long life, low decline oil and gas
reserves also assist us in minimizing costs as stable production makes it easier to
build and maintain operating economies of scale. Lastly, the inherent greater
predictability of low decline oil and gas reserve production better lends itself to
commodity price hedging than high decline reserves. We use our acquisition,
divestiture, and drilling activity to execute this strategy. |
|
|
|
|
Maintain Flexibility. Because of the volatility of commodity prices and the risks
involved in drilling, we remain flexible and adjust our capital budget throughout the
year. We may defer capital projects to seize an attractive acquisition opportunity.
If certain areas generate higher than anticipated returns, we may accelerate drilling
in those areas and decrease capital expenditures elsewhere. We also believe in
maintaining a strong balance sheet and using commodity hedging. This allows us to be
more opportunistic in lower price environments as well as providing more consistent
financial results. |
|
|
|
|
Make Complementary Acquisitions. We target complementary acquisitions in existing
core areas and focus on acquisition opportunities where our existing operating and
technical knowledge is transferable and drilling results can be forecast with
confidence. Over the past three years, we have completed $1.1 billion of |
2
complementary acquisitions. These acquisitions have been located in the Southwestern and
Appalachian regions.
|
|
|
Equity Ownership and Incentive Compensation. We want our employees to think and act
like owners. To achieve this, we reward and encourage them through equity ownership in
Range. All full-time employees receive equity grants. As of December 31, 2008, our
employees owned equity securities (vested and unvested) that had an aggregate market
value of approximately $197.4 million. |
Significant Accomplishments in 2008
|
|
|
Production and reserve growth Fourth quarter 2008 marked the 24th consecutive
quarter of sequential production growth. In 2008, our annual production averaged 385.6
Mmcfe per day, an increase of 21% from 2007. This achievement is the result of our continued drilling success and the
completion and integration of complementary acquisitions. Our business is inherently
volatile, and while consistent growth such as we have experienced over the past six
years will be challenging to sustain, the quality of our technical teams and our
sizable drilling inventory bode well for the future. Proven reserves increased 19% in
2008 to 2.7 Tcfe, marking the seventh consecutive year our proven reserves have
increased. |
|
|
|
|
Successful drilling program In 2008, we drilled 634 gross wells. Production was
replaced by 367% through drilling in 2008, and our overall success rate was 98%. As we
continue to build our drilling inventory for the future, our ability to drill a large
number of wells each year on a cost effective and efficient basis is critical. |
|
|
|
|
Large drilling inventory and emerging plays Maintaining a large drilling
inventory is important. Our drilling inventory at year-end 2008 was slightly more than
12,000 projects. We engaged in meaningful expansion of our shale plays in 2008. We
have now leased 284,000 net acres in our coal bed methane plays and 1.2 million net
acres in our shale plays. We have hired additional experienced technical professionals
to assist us in these emerging plays. |
|
|
|
|
Record financial results and maintenance of a strong balance sheet Growth in
production volumes and higher oil and gas prices drove our record financial performance
in 2008. Revenue, net income, and net cash flow provided from operating activities all
reached annual record highs. On the balance sheet, we refinanced $250 million of
shorter-term bank debt with a like amount of senior subordinated fixed rate 7.25% notes
having a 10-year maturity. This helped to align the maturity schedule of our debt with
the long-term life of our assets. We also further enhanced our liquidity position by
increasing commitments to the bank credit facility by $250.0 million. Financial
leverage, as measured by the debt-to-capitalization ratio rose slightly from 40% at
year-end 2007 to 42% at year-end 2008. Future cash flow will be enhanced by low income
tax payments due to a $158.7 million net operating loss carryforward. |
|
|
|
|
Successful acquisitions completed In 2008, we acquired $845.5 million of
properties located in our core areas. These acquisitions included the purchase of
Barnett Shale producing and non-producing properties and acreage
purchases of $593.8 million, which includes a single acquisition of unproved leasehold
in the Marcellus Shale for $223.9 million. Our 2008 acquisitions increased reserves by
95.6 Bcfe. See Note 3 to our consolidated financial statements. |
|
|
|
|
Successful dispositions completed In first quarter 2008, we sold East Texas
properties for proceeds of $64.0 million. See Note 3 to our consolidated financial
statements. |
Plans for 2009
Our capital expenditure budget for 2009 is currently set at $700.0 million. As has been our
historical practice, we will periodically review our capital expenditures throughout the year and
adjust the budget based on commodity prices and drilling success. The 2009 budget includes $538.9
million to drill 492.0 gross (315.7 net) wells and to undertake 55.0 gross (41.0 net)
recompletions. Also included is $97.7 million for land, $23.9 million for seismic and $39.5
million for the expansion and enhancement of gathering systems and facilities. Approximately 40%
of the budget is attributable to the Southwest Area, 58% to the Appalachia Area and 2% to the Gulf
Coast Area.
3
Production, Revenues and Price History
The following table sets forth information regarding oil and gas production, revenues and
realized prices for the last three years. For additional information on price calculations, see
information set forth in Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Production |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas (Mmcf) |
|
|
114,323 |
|
|
|
89,595 |
|
|
|
70,713 |
|
Crude oil (Mbbls) |
|
|
3,084 |
|
|
|
3,360 |
|
|
|
3,039 |
|
Natural gas liquids (Mbbls) |
|
|
1,386 |
|
|
|
1,115 |
|
|
|
1,092 |
|
Total (Mmcfe) (a) |
|
|
141,145 |
|
|
|
116,441 |
|
|
|
95,498 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and gas revenues ($000) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas |
|
$ |
931,721 |
|
|
$ |
613,454 |
|
|
$ |
418,183 |
|
Crude oil |
|
|
226,347 |
|
|
|
202,931 |
|
|
|
144,251 |
|
Natural gas liquids |
|
|
68,492 |
|
|
|
46,152 |
|
|
|
36,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total oil and gas revenues |
|
$ |
1,226,560 |
|
|
$ |
862,537 |
|
|
$ |
599,139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average sales prices (wellhead) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas (per mcf) |
|
$ |
8.07 |
|
|
$ |
6.54 |
|
|
$ |
6.59 |
|
Crude oil (per bbl) |
|
|
96.77 |
|
|
|
67.47 |
|
|
|
62.36 |
|
Natural gas liquids (per bbl) |
|
|
49.43 |
|
|
|
41.40 |
|
|
|
33.62 |
|
Total (per mcfe) (a) |
|
|
9.14 |
|
|
|
7.37 |
|
|
|
7.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average realized prices (including derivatives that qualify
for hedge accounting): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas (per mcf) |
|
$ |
8.15 |
|
|
$ |
6.85 |
|
|
$ |
5.91 |
|
Crude oil (per bbl) |
|
|
73.38 |
|
|
|
60.40 |
|
|
|
47.46 |
|
Natural gas liquids (per bbl) |
|
|
49.43 |
|
|
|
41.40 |
|
|
|
33.62 |
|
Total (per mcfe) (a) |
|
|
8.69 |
|
|
|
7.41 |
|
|
|
6.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average realized prices (including all derivative settlements) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas (per mcf) |
|
$ |
8.15 |
|
|
$ |
7.66 |
|
|
$ |
6.62 |
|
Crude oil (per bbl) |
|
|
68.20 |
|
|
|
60.16 |
|
|
|
47.46 |
|
Natural gas liquids (per bbl) |
|
|
49.43 |
|
|
|
41.40 |
|
|
|
33.62 |
|
Total (per mcfe) (a) |
|
|
8.58 |
|
|
|
8.02 |
|
|
|
6.80 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Oil and NGLs are converted at the rate of one barrel equals six mcf. |
Employees
As of January 1, 2009, we had 835 full-time employees, 420 of whom were field personnel. All
full-time employees are eligible to receive equity awards approved by the Compensation Committee of
the Board of Directors. No employees are covered by a labor union or other collective bargaining
arrangement. We believe that the relationship with our employees is excellent. We regularly use
independent consultants and contractors to perform various professional services, particularly in
the areas of drilling, completion, field, on-site production operation services and certain
accounting functions.
4
Available Information
We maintain an internet website under the name www.rangeresources.com. We make available,
free of charge, on our website, the annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q,
current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports, as soon as reasonably practicable
after providing such reports to the SEC. Also, our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the charters
of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Dividend Committee, and the Governance and
Nominating Committee, and the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics are available on our website and
in print to any stockholder who provides a written request to the Corporate Secretary at 100
Throckmorton Street, Suite 1200, Fort Worth, Texas 76102. Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
applies to all directors, officers and employees, including the chief executive officer and senior
financial officer.
We file annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on
Form 8-K, proxy statements and other documents with the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934. The public may read and copy any materials that we file with the SEC at the SECs Public
Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. The public may obtain information on the
operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. Also, the SEC
maintains an internet website that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other
information regarding issuers, including Range, that file electronically with the SEC. The public
can obtain any document we file with the SEC at www.sec.gov. Information contained on or
connected to our website is not incorporated by reference into this Form 10-K and should not be
considered part of this report or any other filing that we make with the SEC.
Competition
We encounter substantial competition in developing and acquiring oil and gas properties,
securing and retaining personnel, conducting drilling and field operations and marketing
production. Competitors in exploration, development, acquisitions and production include the major
oil companies as well as numerous independent oil companies, individual proprietors and others.
Although our sizable acreage position and core area concentration provide some competitive
advantages, many competitors have financial and other resources substantially exceeding ours.
Therefore, competitors may be able to pay more for desirable leases and to evaluate, bid for and
purchase a greater number of properties or prospects than our financial or personnel resources
allow. Our ability to replace and expand our reserve base depends on our ability to attract and
retain quality personnel and identify and acquire suitable producing properties and prospects for
future drilling. See Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Marketing and Customers
We market the majority of our oil and gas production from the properties we operate for both
our interest and that of the other working interest owners and royalty owners. We sell our gas
pursuant to a variety of contractual arrangements, generally month-to-month and one to five-year
contracts. Less than 10% of our production is subject to contracts longer than five years.
Pricing on the month-to-month and short-term contracts is based largely on the New York Mercantile
Exchange (NYMEX) pricing, with fixed or floating basis. For one to five-year contracts, we sell
our gas on NYMEX pricing, published regional index pricing or percentage of proceeds sales based on
local indices. We sell less than 400 mcf per day under long-term fixed price contracts. Many
contracts contain provisions for periodic price adjustment, redetermination and other terms
customary in the industry. We sell our gas to utilities, marketing companies and industrial users.
We sell our oil under contracts ranging in terms from month-to-month, up to as long as one year.
The pricing for oil is based upon the posted prices set by major purchasers in the production area,
reporting publications, or upon NYMEX pricing or fixed pricing. All oil pricing is adjusted for
quality and transportation differentials. Oil and gas purchasers are selected on the basis of
price, credit quality and service reliability. For a summary of purchasers of our oil and gas
production that accounted for 10% or more of consolidated revenue, see Note 15 to our consolidated
financial statements. Because alternative purchasers of oil and gas are usually readily available,
we believe that the loss of any of these purchasers would not have a material adverse effect on us.
We enter into hedging transactions with unaffiliated third parties for significant portions of
our production to achieve more predictable cash flows and to reduce our exposure to short-term
fluctuations in oil and gas prices. For a more detailed discussion, see the information set forth
in Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
and Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk. Proximity to local
markets, availability of competitive fuels and overall supply and demand are factors affecting the
prices for which our production can be sold. Market volatility due to international political
developments, overall energy supply and demand, fluctuating weather conditions, economic growth
rates and other factors in the United States and worldwide have had, and will continue to have, a
significant effect on energy prices.
We incur gathering and transportation expenses to move our natural gas and crude oil from the
wellhead and tanks to purchaser specified delivery points. These expenses vary based on volume,
distance shipped and the fee charged by the third-party transporters. In the Southwestern and Gulf
Coast Areas, our gas and oil production is transported primarily through third-
party trucks, field gathering systems and transmission pipelines. Transportation capacity on these
gathering systems and
5
pipelines is occasionally constrained. In Appalachia, we own approximately
5,255 miles of gas gathering pipelines, which transport both a majority of our Appalachian gas
production and third-party gas to transmission lines and directly to end-users, and interstate
pipelines. For additional information, see Risk Factors Our business depends on oil and gas
transportation facilities, many of which are owned by others, in Item 1A of this report.
Governmental Regulation
Our operations are substantially affected by federal, state and local laws and regulations.
In particular, oil and gas production and related operations are, or have been, subject to price
controls, taxes and numerous other laws and regulations. All of the jurisdictions in which we own
or operate producing crude oil and natural gas properties have statutory provisions regulating the
exploration for and production of crude oil and natural gas, including provisions related to
permits for the drilling of wells, bonding requirements to drill or operate wells, the location of
wells, the method of drilling and casing wells, the surface use and restoration of properties upon
which wells are drilled, sourcing and disposal of water used in the drilling and completion process,
and the abandonment of wells. Our operations are also subject to various conservation laws and
regulations. These include the regulation of the size of drilling and spacing units or proration
units, the number of wells which may be drilled in an area, and the unitization or pooling of crude
oil and natural gas wells, as well as regulations that generally prohibit the venting or flaring of
natural gas, and impose certain requirements regarding the ratability or fair apportionment of
production from fields and individual wells.
In August 2005, Congress enacted the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct 2005). Among other
matters, the EPAct 2005 amends the Natural Gas Act (NGA), to make it unlawful for any entity,
including otherwise non-jurisdictional producers such as Range, to use any deceptive or
manipulative device or contrivance in connection with the purchase or sale of natural gas or the
purchase or sale of transportation services subject to regulation by the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission (FERC), in contravention of rules prescribed by the FERC. On January 20, 2006, the
FERC issued rules implementing this provision. The rules make it unlawful in connection with the
purchase or sale of natural gas subject to the jurisdiction of FERC, or the purchase or sale of
transportation services subject to the jurisdiction of FERC, for any entity, directly or
indirectly, to use or employ any device, scheme or artifice to defraud; to make any untrue
statement of material fact or omit any such statement necessary to make the statements not
misleading; or to engage in any act or practice that operates as a fraud or deceit upon any person.
EPAct 2005 also gives the FERC authority to impose civil penalties for violations of the NGA up to
$1,000,000 per day per violation. The new anti-manipulation rule does not apply to activities that
relate only to intrastate or other non-jurisdictional sale or gathering, but does apply to
activities or otherwise non-jurisdictional entities to the extent the activities are conducted in
connection with gas sales, purchases or transportation subject to FERC jurisdiction. It therefore
reflects a significant expansion of FERCs enforcement authority. Range does not anticipate it
will be affected any differently than other producers of natural gas.
Failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations can result in substantial penalties.
The regulatory burden on the industry increases the cost of doing business and affects
profitability. Although we believe we are in substantial compliance with all applicable laws and
regulations, such laws and regulations are frequently amended or reinterpreted. Therefore, we are
unable to predict the future costs or impact of compliance. Additional proposals and proceedings
that affect the oil and gas industry are regularly considered by Congress, the states, the FERC,
and the courts. We cannot predict when or whether any such proposals may become effective.
On December 26, 2007, FERC issued a final rule on the annual natural gas transaction reporting
requirements, as amended by subsequent orders on rehearing (Order 704). Under Order 704,
wholesale buyers and sellers of more than 2.2 million MMBtus of physical natural gas in the
previous calendar year, including natural gas gatherers and marketers, are now required to report,
on May 1 of each year beginning in 2009, aggregate volumes of natural gas purchased or sold at
wholesale in the prior calendar year to the extent such transactions utilize, contribute to, or may
contribute to the formation of price indices. It is the responsibility of the reporting entity to
determine which individual transactions should be reported based on the guidance of Order 704.
Order 704 also requires market participants to indicate whether they report prices to any index
publishers, and if so, whether their reporting complies with FERCs policy statement on price
reporting.
On November 20, 2008, FERC issued a final rule on the daily scheduled flow and capacity
posting requirements (Order 720). Under Order 720, major non-interstate pipelines, defined as
certain non-interstate pipelines delivering, on an annual basis, more than an average of 50 million
MMBtus of gas over the previous three calendar years, are required to post daily certain
information regarding the pipelines capacity and scheduled flows for each receipt and delivery
point that has a design capacity equal to or greater than 15,000 MMBtu per day. Requests for
clarification and rehearing of Order 720 have been filed at FERC and a decision on those requests
is pending.
6
Environmental and Occupational Matters
Our operations are subject to numerous stringent federal, state and local statutes and
regulations governing the discharge of materials into the environment or otherwise relating to
environmental protection, some of which carry substantial administrative, civil and criminal
penalties for failure to comply. These laws and regulations may require the acquisition of a
permit before drilling commences, restrict the types, quantities and concentrations of various
substances that can be released into the environment in connection with drilling, production and
transporting through pipelines, govern the sourcing and disposal of water used in the drilling and
completion process, limit or prohibit drilling activities in certain areas and on certain lands
lying within wilderness, wetlands, frontier and other protected areas, require some form of
remedial action to prevent or mitigate pollution from former operations such as plugging abandoned
wells or closing earthen pits and impose substantial liabilities for pollution resulting from
operations or failure to comply with regulatory filings. In addition, these laws and regulations
may restrict the rate of production.
The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, as amended
(CERCLA), also known as the Superfund law, and comparable state laws impose liability, without
regard to fault or the legality of the original conduct, on certain classes of persons who are
considered to be responsible for the release of a hazardous substance into the environment.
These persons may include owners or operators of the disposal site or sites where the release
occurred and companies that disposed of or arranged for the disposal of the hazardous substances at
the site where the release occurred. Under CERCLA, all of these persons may be subject to joint
and several liabilities for the costs of cleaning up the hazardous substances that have been
released into the environment, for damages to natural resources and for the costs of certain health
studies. In addition, it is not uncommon for neighboring landowners and other third parties,
pursuant to environmental statutes, common law or both, to file claims for personal injury and
property damages allegedly caused by the release of hazardous substances or other pollutants into
the environment. Although petroleum, including crude oil and natural gas, is not a hazardous
substance under CERCLA, at least two courts have ruled that certain wastes associated with the
production of crude oil may be classified as hazardous substances under CERCLA and that releases
of such wastes may therefore give rise to liability under CERCLA. While we generate materials in
the course of our operations that may be regulated as hazardous substances, we have not received
notification that we may be potentially responsible for cleanup costs under CERCLA or comparable
state laws. Other state laws regulate the disposal of oil and gas wastes, and new state and
federal legislative initiatives that could have a significant impact on us may periodically be
proposed and enacted.
We also may incur liability under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, as amended
(RCRA), which imposes requirements related to the handling and disposal of solid and hazardous
wastes. While there is an exclusion from the definition of hazardous wastes for drilling fluids,
produced waters, and other wastes associated with the exploration, development, or production of
crude oil, natural gas or geothermal energy, these wastes may be regulated by the United States
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) or state agencies as non-hazardous solid waste. Moreover,
ordinary industrial wastes, such as paint wastes, waste solvents, laboratory wastes and waste
compressor oils, can be regulated as hazardous wastes. Although the costs of managing wastes
classified as hazardous waste may be significant, we do not expect to experience more burdensome
costs than similarly situated companies.
We currently own or lease, and have in the past owned or leased, properties that for many
years have been used for the exploration and production of crude oil and natural gas. Petroleum
hydrocarbons or wastes may have been disposed of or released on or under the properties owned or
leased by us, or on or under other locations where such materials have been taken for disposal. In
addition, some of these properties have been operated by third parties whose treatment and disposal
or release of petroleum hydrocarbons and wastes was not under our control. These properties and
the materials disposed or released on them may be subject to CERCLA, RCRA and comparable state laws
and regulations. Under such laws and regulations, we could be required to remove or remediate
previously disposed wastes or property contamination, or to perform remedial activities to prevent
future contamination.
The Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended (FWPCA), and comparable state laws
impose restrictions and strict controls regarding the discharge of pollutants, including produced
waters and other oil and gas wastes, into federal and state waters. The discharge of pollutants
into regulated waters is prohibited, except in accordance with the terms of a permit issued by EPA
or the state. These laws and any implementing regulations provide for administrative, civil and
criminal penalties for any unauthorized discharges of oil and other substances in reportable
quantities and may impose substantial potential liability for the costs of removal, remediation and
damages. Pursuant to these laws and regulations, we may be required to obtain and maintain
approvals or permits for the discharge of wastewater or storm water and are required to develop and
implement spill prevention, control and countermeasure plans, also referred to as SPCC plans, in
connection with on-site storage of greater than threshold quantities of oil. We are currently
undertaking a review of recently acquired oil and gas properties to determine the need for new or
updated SPCC plans and, where necessary, we will be developing or upgrading such plans, the costs
of which are not expected to be substantial.
7
The Clean Air Act, as amended, and comparable state laws restrict the emission of air
pollutants from many sources, including compressor stations. These laws and any implementing
regulations may require us to obtain pre-approval for the construction or modification of certain
projects or facilities expected to produce air emissions, impose stringent air permit requirements,
or use specific equipment or technologies to control emissions. While we may be required to incur
certain capital expenditures in the next few years for air pollution control equipment in
connection with maintaining or obtaining operating permits addressing other air emission-related
issues, we do not believe that such requirements will have a material adverse effect on our
operations.
Changes in environmental laws and regulations sometimes occur, and any changes that result in
more stringent and costly waste handling, storage, transport, disposal or cleanup requirements for
any substances used or produced in our operations could materially adversely affect our operations
and financial position, as well as those of the oil and gas industry in general. For instance,
recent scientific studies have suggested that emissions of certain gases commonly referred to as
greenhouse gases and including carbon dioxide and methane, may be contributing to warming of the
Earths atmosphere. In response to such studies, the U.S. Congress is considering legislation to
reduce emissions of greenhouse gases and more than one-third of the states, either individually or
through multi-state initiatives already have begun implementing legal measures to reduce emissions
of greenhouse gases. As an alternative to reducing emissions of
greenhouse gases, the Congress may consider the implementation of a
program to tax the emission of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse
gases. Also, the U.S. Supreme Courts holding in its 2007 decision, Massachusetts,
et. al. v. EPA, that carbon dioxide may be regulated as an air pollutant under the federal Clean
Air Act could result in future regulation of greenhouse gas emissions from stationary sources, even
if Congress does not adopt new legislation specifically addressing emissions of greenhouse gases.
In July 2008, EPA released an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking regarding possible future
regulation of greenhouse gas emissions under the Clean Air Act. Although the notice did not
propose any specific new regulatory requirements for greenhouse gases, it indicates that federal
regulation of greenhouse gas emissions could occur in the near
future. It is possible that new laws or regulations could establish a
greenhouse cap and trade program, whereby major sources of emissions,
such as electric power plants, or major producers of fuels, such as
refineries or gas processing plants, would be required to acquire and
surrender emission allowances. While we do not operate stationary
sources that emit significant quantities of greenhouse gases,
including carbon dioxide, we do utilize gas processing plants to
process the natural gas that we produce and, thus if such processors
were to incur increased costs to acquire and surrender emission
allowances or otherwise to capture and dispose of greenhouse gases, it
is possible that these costs, which might be significant, could be
passed along to us as well as similarly situated producers. Moreover,
any adoption of a program to tax the emission of carbon dioxide and
other greenhouse gases potentially could be imposed on us and other
similarly situated producers of natural gas. Although it is not possible
at this time to predict how legislation or new regulations that may be adopted to address
greenhouse gas emissions would impact our business, any such future laws and regulations could
result in increased compliance costs or additional operating restrictions, and could have a
material adverse effect on our business or demand for our products. Given the possible impact of
legislation and/or regulation of carbon dioxide, methane and other greenhouse gases, we have
considered and expect to continue to consider the impact of laws or regulations intended to address
climate change on our operations. We do not believe our operations require reporting or monitoring
of carbon dioxide emissions under existing laws and regulations;
however, we do operate mobile
equipment in the normal course of our business that emits carbon dioxide as well as some stationary
engines that power compressors and pumping equipment. Methane is a primary
constituent of natural gas and, like all oil and gas exploration and production companies, we
produce significant quantities of natural gas; however, such production of natural gas, including
its constituent hydrocarbon including methane, is gathered and transported in pipelines under
pressure and we therefore do not emit significant quantities of methane in connection with our
operations. Given our lack of significant points of carbon dioxide emissions, we have focused most
of our efforts on physical environmental ground, water and air issues in our operations
We are also subject to the requirements of the federal Occupational Safety and Health Act, as
amended (OSHA), and comparable state laws that regulate the protection of the health and safety
of employees. In addition, OSHAs hazard communication standard requires that information be
maintained about hazardous materials used or produced in our operations and that this information
be provided to employees, state and local government authorities and citizens. We believe that our
operations are in substantial compliance with the OSHA requirements.
In summary, we believe we are in substantial compliance with currently applicable
environmental laws and regulations. Although we have not experienced any material adverse effect
from compliance with environmental requirements, there is no assurance that this will continue. We
did not have any material capital or other non-recurring expenditures in connection with complying
with environmental laws or environmental remediation matters in 2008, nor do we anticipate that
such expenditures will be material in 2009.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
We are subject to various risks and uncertainties in the course of our business. The
following summarizes some, but not all, of the risks and uncertainties, which may adversely affect
our business, financial condition or results of operations. Our business could also be impacted by
additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be
immaterial.
Risks Related to Our Business
Volatility of oil and gas prices significantly affects our cash flow and capital resources and
could hamper our ability to produce oil and gas economically
8
Oil and gas prices are volatile, and a decline in prices adversely affects our profitability
and financial condition. Higher oil and gas prices have contributed to our positive earnings over
the last several years. The oil and gas industry is typically cyclical, and prices for oil and gas
have been highly volatile. Historically, the industry has experienced severe downturns
characterized by oversupply and/or weak demand. Long-term supply and demand for oil and gas is
uncertain and subject to a myriad of factors such as:
|
|
|
the domestic and foreign supply of oil and gas; |
|
|
|
|
the price and availability of alternative fuels; |
|
|
|
|
weather conditions; |
|
|
|
|
the level of consumer demand; |
|
|
|
|
the price of foreign imports; |
|
|
|
|
worldwide economic conditions; |
|
|
|
|
the availability, proximity and capacity of transportation facilities and processing
facilities; |
|
|
|
|
the effect of worldwide energy conservation efforts; |
|
|
|
|
political conditions in oil and gas producing regions; and |
|
|
|
|
domestic and foreign governmental regulations and taxes. |
The recent decreases in oil and gas prices have adversely affected our revenues, net income,
cash flow and proved reserves. Significant price decreases could have a material adverse effect on
our operations and limit our ability to fund capital expenditures. Without the ability to fund
capital expenditures, we would be unable to replace reserves and production. Sustained decreases
in oil and gas prices will further adversely affect our revenues, net income, cash flows, proved
reserves and our ability to fund capital expenditures.
Information concerning our reserves and future net reserve estimates is uncertain
There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of proved oil and gas
reserves and their values, including many factors beyond our control. Estimates of proved reserves
are by their nature uncertain. Although we believe these estimates are reasonable, actual
production, revenues and costs to develop will likely vary from estimates and these variances could
be material.
Reserve estimation is a subjective process that involves estimating volumes to be recovered
from underground accumulations of oil and gas that cannot be directly measured. As a result,
different petroleum engineers, each using industry-accepted geologic and engineering practices and
scientific methods, may calculate different estimates of reserves and future net cash flows based
on the same available data. Because of the subjective nature of oil and gas reserve estimates,
each of the following items may differ materially from the amounts or other factors estimated:
|
|
|
the amount and timing of oil and gas production; |
|
|
|
|
the revenues and costs associated with that production; and |
|
|
|
|
the amount and timing of future development expenditures. |
The
discounted future net cash flows from our proved reserves included in this report should not
be considered as the market value of the reserves attributable to our properties. As required by
generally accepted accounting principles, the estimated discounted future net revenues from our
proved reserves are based generally on prices and costs as of the date of the estimate, while
actual future prices and costs may be materially higher or lower. In addition, the 10 percent
discount factor that is required to be used to calculate discounted future net revenues for
reporting purposes under generally accepted accounting principles is not necessarily the most
appropriate discount factor based on the cost of capital in effect from time to time and risks
associated with our business and the oil and gas industry in general.
If oil and gas prices decrease or drilling efforts are unsuccessful, we may be required to record
write downs of our oil and gas properties
We have been in the past and were in 2008, required to write down the carrying value of
certain of our oil and gas properties, and there is a risk that we will be required to take
additional write downs in the future. Writedowns may occur
when oil and gas prices are low, or if we have downward adjustments to our estimated proved
reserves, increases in our
9
estimates of operating or development costs, deterioration in our
drilling results or mechanical problems with wells where the cost to redrill or repair does not
justify the expense.
Accounting rules require that the carrying value of oil and gas properties be periodically
reviewed for possible impairment. Impairment is recognized when the book value of a proven
property is greater than the expected undiscounted future net cash flows from that property and on
acreage when conditions indicate the carrying value is not recoverable. We may be required to
write down the carrying value of a property based on oil and gas prices at the time of the
impairment review, or as a result of continuing evaluation of drilling results, production data,
economics and other factors. While an impairment charge reflects our long-term ability to recover
an investment, it does not impact cash or cash flow from operating activities, but it does reduce
our reported earnings and increases our leverage ratios.
Significant capital expenditures are required to replace our reserves
Our exploration, development and acquisition activities require substantial capital
expenditures. Historically, we have funded our capital expenditures through a combination of cash
flow from operations, our bank credit facility and debt and equity issuances. From time to time,
we have also engaged in asset monetization transactions. Future cash flows are subject to a number
of variables, such as the level of production from existing wells, prices of oil and gas and our
success in developing and producing new reserves. If our access to capital were limited due to
numerous factors which could include a decrease in revenues due to lower gas and oil prices or
decreased production or deterioration of the credit and capital markets, we would have a reduced
ability to replace our reserves. We may not be able to incur additional bank debt, issue debt or
equity, engage in asset monetization or access other methods of financing on an economic basis to
meet our reserve replacement requirements.
The amount available for borrowing under our bank credit facility is subject to a borrowing
base, which is determined by our lenders taking into account our estimated proved reserves and is
subject to periodic redeterminations based on pricing models determined by the lenders at such
time. The recent decline in oil and gas prices has adversely impacted the value of our estimated
proved reserves and, in turn, the market values used by our lenders to determine our borrowing
base. If commodity prices continue to decline in 2009, it will have similar adverse effects on our
reserves and borrowing base.
Our future success depends on our ability to replace reserves that we produce
Because the rate of production from oil and gas properties generally declines as reserves are
depleted, our future success depends upon our ability to economically find or acquire and produce
additional oil and gas reserves. Except to the extent that we acquire additional properties
containing proved reserves, conduct successful exploration and development activities or, through
engineering studies, identify additional behind-pipe zones or secondary recovery reserves, our
proved reserves will decline as reserves are produced. Future oil and gas production, therefore,
is highly dependent upon our level of success in acquiring or finding additional reserves that are
economically recoverable. We cannot assure you that we will be able to find or acquire and develop
additional reserves at an acceptable cost.
Our indebtedness could limit our ability to successfully operate our business
We are leveraged and our exploration and development program will require substantial capital
resources depending on the level of drilling and the expected cost of services. Our existing
operations will also require ongoing capital expenditures. In addition, if we decide to pursue
additional acquisitions, our capital expenditures will increase, both to complete such acquisitions
and to explore and develop any newly acquired properties.
The degree to which we are leveraged could have other important consequences, including the
following:
|
|
|
we may be required to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flows from
operations to the payment of our indebtedness, reducing the funds available for our
operations; |
|
|
|
|
a portion of our borrowings are at variable rates of interest, making us vulnerable
to increases in interest rates; |
|
|
|
|
we may be more highly leveraged than some of our competitors, which could place us
at a competitive disadvantage; |
|
|
|
|
our degree of leverage may make us more vulnerable to a downturn in our business or
the general economy; |
|
|
|
|
we are subject to numerous financial and other restrictive covenants contained in
our existing credit agreements the breach of which could materially and adversely
impact our financial performance; |
|
|
|
|
our debt level could limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes
in our business and the industry in which we operate; and |
|
|
|
|
we may have difficulties borrowing money in the future. |
10
Despite our current levels of indebtedness, we still may be able to incur substantially more
debt. This could further increase the risks described above. In addition to those risks above, we
may not be able to obtain funding on acceptable terms because of the deterioration of the credit
and capital markets. This may hinder or prevent us from meeting our future capital needs. In
particular, the cost of raising money in the debt and equity capital markets has increased
substantially while the availability of funds from those markets generally has diminished
significantly.
Our business is subject to operating hazards that could result in substantial losses or liabilities
that may not be fully covered under our insurance policies
Oil and gas operations are subject to many risks, including well blowouts, craterings,
explosions, uncontrollable flows of oil, natural gas or well fluids, fires, formations with
abnormal pressures, pipeline ruptures or spills, pollution, releases of toxic natural gas and other
environmental hazards and risks. If any of these hazards occur, we could sustain substantial
losses as a result of:
|
|
|
injury or loss of life; |
|
|
|
|
severe damage to or destruction of property, natural resources and equipment; |
|
|
|
|
pollution or other environmental damage; |
|
|
|
|
clean-up responsibilities; |
|
|
|
|
regulatory investigations and penalties; or |
|
|
|
|
suspension of operations. |
As we drill to deeper horizons and in more geologically complex areas, we could experience a
greater increase in operating and financial risks due to inherent higher reservoir pressures and
unknown downhole risk exposures. As we continue to drill deeper, the number of rigs capable of
drilling to such depths will be fewer and we may experience greater competition from other
operators.
We maintain insurance against some, but not all, of these potential risks and losses. We may
elect not to obtain insurance if we believe that the cost of available insurance is excessive
relative to the risks presented. We have experienced substantial increases in premiums, especially
in areas affected by hurricanes and tropical storms. Insurers have imposed revised limits
affecting how much the insurers will pay on actual storm claims plus the cost to re-drill wells
where substantial damage has been incurred. Insurers are also requiring us to retain larger
deductibles and reducing the scope of what insurable losses will include. Even with the increase
in future insurance premiums, coverage will be reduced, requiring us to bear a greater potential
risk if our oil and gas properties are damaged. We do not maintain any business interruption
insurance. In addition, pollution and environmental risks generally are not fully insurable. If a
significant accident or other event occurs that is not fully covered by insurance, it could have a
material adverse affect on our financial condition and results of operations.
We are subject to financing and interest rate exposure risks
Our business and operating results can be harmed by factors such as the availability, terms of
and cost of capital, increases in interest rates or a reduction in our credit rating. These
changes could cause our cost of doing business to increase, limit our ability to pursue acquisition
opportunities, reduce cash flow used for drilling and place us at a competitive disadvantage. For
example, at December 31, 2008, approximately 61% of our debt is at fixed interest rates with the
remaining 39% subject to variable interest rates.
Recent and continuing disruptions and volatility in the global finance markets may lead to a
contraction in credit availability impacting our ability to finance our operations. We require
continued access to capital; a significant reduction in cash flows from operations or the
availability of credit could materially and adversely affect our ability to achieve our planned
growth and operating results. We are exposed to some credit risk related to our senior credit
facility to the extent that one or more of our lenders may be unable to provide necessary funding to us under our
existing revolving line of credit if it experiences liquidity problems.
Difficult conditions in the global capital markets and the economy generally may materially
adversely affect our business and results of operations
Our results of operations are materially affected by conditions in the domestic capital
markets and the economy generally. The stress experienced by domestic capital markets that began
in the second half of 2007 continued and
substantially increased during third quarter 2008. Recently, concerns over inflation, energy
costs, geopolitical issues, the availability and cost of credit, the U.S. mortgage market and a
declining real estate market in the U.S. have contributed to
11
increased volatility and diminished
expectations of the economy and the markets going forward. These factors, combined with volatile
oil and gas prices, declining business and consumer confidence and increased unemployment, have
precipitated an economic slowdown. In addition, the fixed-income markets are experiencing a period
of extreme volatility which has negatively impacted market liquidity conditions.
The capital markets have experienced decreased liquidity, increased price volatility, credit
downgrade events, and increased probabilities of default. These events and the continuing market
upheavals may have an adverse effect on us because our liquidity and ability to fund our capital
expenditures is dependent in part upon our bank borrowings and access to the public capital
markets. Our revenues are likely to decline in such circumstances. In addition, in the event of
extreme prolonged market events, such as a worsening of the global credit crisis, we could incur
significant losses.
Hedging transactions may limit our potential gains and involve other risks
To manage our exposure to price risk, we, from time to time, enter into hedging arrangements,
utilizing commodity derivatives with respect to a significant portion of our future production.
The goal of these hedges is to lock in prices so as to limit volatility and increase the
predictability of cash flow. These transactions limit our potential gains if oil and gas prices
rise above the price established by the hedge.
In addition, hedging transactions may expose us to the risk of financial loss in certain
circumstances, including instances in which:
|
|
|
our production is less than expected; |
|
|
|
|
the counterparties to our futures contracts fail to perform under the contracts; or |
|
|
|
|
an event materially impacts oil or gas prices or the relationship between the hedged
price index and the oil and gas sales price. |
We cannot assure you that any hedging transactions we may enter into will adequately protect
us from declines in the prices of oil and gas. On the other hand, where we choose not to engage in
hedging transactions in the future, we may be more adversely affected by changes in oil and gas
prices than our competitors who engage in hedging transactions.
Many of our current and potential competitors have greater resources than we have and we may not be
able to successfully compete in acquiring, exploring and developing new properties
We face competition in every aspect of our business, including, but not limited to, acquiring
reserves and leases, obtaining goods, services and employees needed to operate and manage our
business and marketing oil and gas. Competitors include multinational oil companies, independent
production companies and individual producers and operators. Many of our competitors have greater
financial and other resources than we do. As a result, these competitors may be able to address
these competitive factors more effectively than we can or weather industry downturns more easily
than we can.
The demand for field services and their ability to meet that demand may limit our ability to drill
and produce our oil and natural gas properties
In a rising price environment, such as those experienced in 2007 and early 2008, well service
providers and related equipment and personnel are in short supply. This causes escalating prices,
the possibility of poor services coupled with potential damage to downhole reservoirs and personnel
injuries. Such pressures increase the actual cost of services, extend the time to secure such
services and add costs for damages due to accidents sustained from the over use of equipment and
inexperienced personnel. In some cases, we are operating in new areas where services and
infrastructure do not exist or in urban areas which are more restrictive.
A change in the jurisdictional characterization of some of our assets by federal, state or local
regulatory agencies or a change in policy by those agencies may result in increased regulation of
our assets, which may cause our revenues to decline and operating
expenses to increase
Section 1(b) of the Natural Gas Act of 1938 (NGA) exempts natural gas gathering facilities
from regulation by FERC as a natural gas company under the NGA. We believe that the natural gas
pipelines in our gathering systems meet the traditional tests FERC has used to establish a
pipelines status as a gatherer not subject to regulation as a natural gas company.
However, the distinction between FERC-regulated transmission services and federally unregulated
gathering services is the subject of on-going litigation, so the classification and regulation of
our gathering facilities are subject to change based on future determinations by FERC, the courts,
or Congress.
12
While our natural gas gathering operations are generally exempt from FERC regulation under the
NGA, our gas gathering operations may be subject to certain FERC reporting and posting requirements
in a given year. FERC has recently issued a final rule (as amended by orders on rehearing, Order
704) requiring certain participants in the natural gas market, including certain gathering
facilities and natural gas marketers that engage in a minimum level of natural gas sales or
purchases, to submit annual reports regarding those transactions to FERC. In addition, FERC has
issued a final rule (Order 720) requiring major non-interstate pipelines, defined as certain
non-interstate pipelines delivering more than an average of 50 million MMBtu of gas over the
previous three calendar years, to post daily certain information regarding the pipelines capacity
and scheduled flows for each receipt and delivery point that has design capacity equal to or
greater than 15,000 MMBtu per day.
Other FERC regulations may indirectly impact our businesses and the markets for products
derived from these businesses. FERCs policies and practices across the range of its natural gas
regulatory activities, including, for example, its policies on open access transportation, gas
quality, ratemaking, capacity release and market center promotion, may indirectly affect the
intrastate natural gas market. In recent years, FERC has pursued pro-competitive policies in its
regulation of interstate natural gas pipelines. However, we cannot assure you that FERC will
continue this approach as it considers matters such as pipelines rates and rules and policies that
may affect rights of access to transportation capacity. For more information regarding the
regulation of our operations, please see Government
Regulation
in item 1 of this report.
Should we fail to comply with all applicable FERC administered statutes, rules, regulations and
orders, we could be subject to substantial penalties and fines
Under the EP Act 2005, FERC has civil penalty authority under the NGA to impose penalties for
current violations of up to $1 million per day for each violation and disgorgement of profits
associated with any violation. While our operations have not been regulated as a natural gas
company by FERC under the NGA, FERC has adopted regulations that may subject certain of four
otherwise non-FERC jurisdiction facilities to FERC annual reporting and daily scheduled flow and
capacity posting requirements. We also must comply the anti-market manipulation rules enforced by
FERC. Additional rules and legislation pertaining to those and other matters may be considered or
adopted by FERC from time to time. Failure to comply with those regulations in the future could
subject Range to civil penalty liability. For more information regarding regulation of our
operations, please see Government Regulation in Item 1 of this report.
The oil and gas industry is subject to extensive regulation
The oil and gas industry is subject to various types of regulations in the United States by
local, state and federal agencies. Legislation affecting the industry is under constant review for
amendment or expansion, frequently increasing our regulatory burden. Numerous departments and
agencies, both state and federal, are authorized by statute to issue rules and regulations binding
on participants in the oil and gas industry. Compliance with such rules and regulations often
increases our cost of doing business, delays our operations and, in turn, decreases our
profitability.
Our operations are subject to numerous and increasingly strict federal, state and local laws,
regulations and enforcement policies relating to the environment. We may incur significant costs
and liabilities in complying with existing or future environmental laws, regulations and
enforcement policies and may incur costs arising out of property damage or injuries to employees
and other persons. These costs may result from our current and former operations and even may be
caused by previous owners of property we own or lease. Any past, present or future failure by us
to completely comply with environmental laws, regulations and enforcement policies could cause us
to incur substantial fines, sanctions or liabilities from cleanup costs or other damages.
Incurrence of those costs or damages could reduce or eliminate funds available for exploration,
development or acquisitions or cause us to incur losses.
Acquisitions are subject to the risks and uncertainties of evaluating reserves and potential
liabilities and may be disruptive and difficult to integrate into our business
We could be subject to significant liabilities related to our acquisitions. It generally is
not feasible to review in detail every individual property included in an acquisition. Ordinarily,
a review is focused on higher valued properties. However, even a detailed review of all properties
and records may not reveal existing or potential problems in all of the properties, nor will it
permit us to become sufficiently familiar with the properties to assess fully their deficiencies
and capabilities. We do not always inspect every well we acquire, and environmental problems, such
as groundwater contamination, are not necessarily observable even when an inspection is performed.
For example, several years ago, we consummated a large acquisition that proved extremely
disappointing. Production from the acquired properties fell more rapidly than anticipated and
further development results were below the results we had originally projected. The poor
production performance of these properties resulted in material downward
13
reserve revisions. There
is no assurance that our recent and/or future acquisition activity will not result in similarly
disappointing results.
In addition, there is intense competition for acquisition opportunities in our industry.
Competition for acquisitions may increase the cost of, or cause us to refrain from, completing
acquisitions. Our acquisition strategy is dependent upon, among other things, our ability to
obtain debt and equity financing and, in some cases, regulatory approvals. Our ability to pursue
our acquisition strategy may be hindered if we are unable to obtain financing on terms acceptable
to us or regulatory approvals.
Acquisitions often pose integration risks and difficulties. In connection with recent and
future acquisitions, the process of integrating acquired operations into our existing operations
may result in unforeseen operating difficulties and may require significant management attention
and financial resources that would otherwise be available for the ongoing development or expansion
of existing operations. Future acquisitions could result in our incurring additional debt,
contingent liabilities, expenses and diversion of resources, all of which could have a material
adverse effect on our financial condition and operating results.
Our success depends on key members of our management and our ability to attract and retain
experienced technical and other professional personnel
Our
success is highly dependent on our management personnel and none of
them is currently subject
to an employment contract. The loss of one or more of these individuals could have a material
adverse effect on our business. Furthermore, competition for experienced technical and other
professional personnel is intense. If we cannot retain our current personnel or attract additional
experienced personnel, our ability to compete could be adversely affected. Also, the loss of
experienced personnel could lead to a loss of technical expertise.
Drilling is a high-risk activity
The cost of drilling, completing, and operating a well is often uncertain, and many factors
can adversely affect the economics of a well. Our efforts will be uneconomical if we drill dry
holes or wells that are productive but do not produce enough oil and gas to be commercially viable
after drilling, operating and other costs. Furthermore, our drilling and producing operations may
be curtailed, delayed, or canceled as a result of other factors, including:
|
|
|
high costs, shortages or delivery delays of drilling rigs, equipment, labor, or
other services; |
|
|
|
|
unexpected operational events and drilling conditions; |
|
|
|
|
reductions in oil and gas prices; |
|
|
|
|
limitations in the market for oil and gas; |
|
|
|
|
adverse weather conditions; |
|
|
|
|
facility or equipment malfunctions; |
|
|
|
|
equipment failures or accidents; |
|
|
|
|
title problems; |
|
|
|
|
pipe or cement failures; |
|
|
|
|
casing collapses; |
|
|
|
|
compliance with environmental and other governmental requirements; |
|
|
|
|
environmental hazards, such as natural gas leaks, oil spills, pipelines ruptures,
and discharges of toxic gases; |
|
|
|
|
lost or damaged oilfield drilling and service tools; |
|
|
|
|
unusual or unexpected geological formations; |
|
|
|
|
loss of drilling fluid circulation; |
|
|
|
|
pressure or irregularities in formations; |
|
|
|
|
fires; |
|
|
|
|
natural disasters; |
|
|
|
|
blowouts, surface craterings and explosions; and |
|
|
|
|
uncontrollable flows of oil, natural gas or well fluids. |
14
If any of these factors were to occur with respect to a particular field, we could lose all or
a part of our investment in the field, or we could fail to realize the expected benefits from the
field, either of which could materially and adversely affect our revenue and profitability.
New technologies may cause our current exploration and drilling methods to become obsolete
The oil and gas industry is subject to rapid and significant advancements in technology,
including the introduction of new products and services using new technologies. As competitors use
or develop new technologies, we may be placed at a competitive disadvantage, and competitive
pressures may force us to implement new technologies at a substantial cost. In addition,
competitors may have greater financial, technical and personnel resources that allow them to enjoy
technological advantages and may in the future allow them to implement new technologies before we
can. One or more of the technologies that we currently use or that we may implement in the future
may become obsolete. We cannot be certain that we will be able to implement technologies on a
timely basis or at a cost that is acceptable to us. If we are unable to maintain technological
advancements consistent with industry standards, our operations and financial condition may be
adversely affected.
Our business depends on oil and gas transportation facilities, most of which are owned by others
The marketability of our oil and gas production depends in part on the availability, proximity
and capacity of pipeline systems owned by third parties. The lack of available capacity on these
systems and facilities could result in the shut-in of producing wells or the delay or
discontinuance of development plans for properties. Although we have some contractual control over
the transportation of our product, material changes in these business relationships could
materially affect our operations. We generally do not purchase firm transportation on third party
facilities and therefore, our production transportation can be interrupted by those having firm
arrangements. Although, recently we have entered into some firm arrangements in certain production
areas. Federal and state regulation of oil and gas production and transportation, tax and energy
policies, changes in supply and demand, pipeline pressures, damage to or destruction of pipelines
and general economic conditions could adversely affect our ability to produce, gather and transport
oil and gas. If any of these third party pipelines and other facilities become partially or fully
unavailable to transport our product, or if the natural gas quality specifications for a natural
gas pipeline or facility changes so as to restrict our ability to transport natural gas on those
pipelines or facilities, our revenues could be adversely affected.
The disruption of third-party facilities due to maintenance and/or weather could negatively
impact our ability to market and deliver our products. We have no control over when or if such
facilities are restored or what prices will be charged. A total shut-in of production could
materially affect us due to a lack of cash flow, and if a substantial portion of the production is
hedged at lower than market prices, those financial hedges would have to be paid from borrowings
absent sufficient cash flow.
Any failure to meet our debt obligations could harm our business, financial condition and results
of operations
If our cash flow and capital resources are insufficient to fund our debt obligations, we may
be forced to sell assets, seek additional equity or restructure our debt. In addition, any failure
to make scheduled payments of interest and principal on our outstanding indebtedness would likely
result in a reduction of our credit rating, which could harm our ability to incur additional
indebtedness on acceptable terms. Our cash flow and capital resources may be insufficient for
payment of interest on and principal of our debt in the future and any such alternative measures
may be unsuccessful or may not permit us to meet scheduled debt service obligations, which could
cause us to default on our obligations and impair our liquidity.
We exist in a litigious environment
Any constituent could bring suit regarding our existing or planned operations or allege a
violation of an existing contract. Any such action could delay when planned operations can
actually commence or could cause a halt to existing production until such alleged violations are
resolved by the courts. Not only could we incur significant legal and support expenses in
defending our rights, but halting existing production or delaying planned operations could impact
our future operations and financial condition. Such legal disputes could also distract management
and other personnel from their primary responsibilities.
Our financial statements are complex
Due to United States generally accepted accounting rules and the nature of our business, our
financial statements continue to be complex, particularly with reference to hedging, asset
retirement obligations, equity awards, deferred taxes and the accounting for our deferred
compensation plans. We expect such complexity to continue and possibly increase.
15
Risks Related to Our Common Stock
Common stockholders will be diluted if additional shares are issued
In 2004 and 2005, we sold 33.8 million shares of common stock to finance acquisitions. In
2006, we issued 6.5 million shares as part of the Stroud acquisition. In 2007, we sold 8.1 million
shares of common stock to finance acquisitions. In 2008, we sold 4.4 million shares of common
stock with the proceeds used to pay down a portion of the outstanding balance of our bank credit
facility. Our ability to repurchase securities for cash is limited by our bank credit facility and
our senior subordinated note agreements. We also issue restricted stock and stock appreciation
rights to our employees and directors as part of their compensation. In addition, we may issue
additional shares of common stock, additional subordinated notes or other securities or debt
convertible into common stock, to extend maturities or fund capital expenditures, including
acquisitions. If we issue additional shares of our common stock in the future, it may have a
dilutive effect on our current outstanding stockholders.
Dividend limitations
Limits on the payment of dividends and other restricted payments, as defined, are imposed
under our bank credit facility and under our senior subordinated note agreements. These
limitations may, in certain circumstances, limit or prevent the payment of dividends independent of
our dividend policy.
Our stock price may be volatile and you may not be able to resell shares of our common stock at or
above the price you paid
The price of our common stock fluctuates significantly, which may result in losses for
investors. The market price of our common stock has been volatile. From January 1, 2006 to
December 31, 2008, the price of our common stock reported by the New York Stock Exchange ranged
from a low of $21.74 per share to a high of $76.81 per share. We expect our stock to continue to
be subject to fluctuations as a result of a variety of factors, including factors beyond our
control. These factors include:
|
|
|
changes in oil and gas prices; |
|
|
|
|
variations in quarterly drilling, recompletions, acquisitions and operating results; |
|
|
|
|
changes in financial estimates by securities analysts; |
|
|
|
|
changes in market valuations of comparable companies; |
|
|
|
|
additions or departures of key personnel; or |
|
|
|
|
future sales of our stock. |
We may fail to meet expectations of our stockholders or of securities analysts at some time in
the future and our stock price could decline as a result.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
As of the date of this filing, we have no unresolved comments from the staff of the Securities
and Exchange Commission.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The table below summarizes certain data for our core operating areas for the year ended
December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daily |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Percentage of |
|
|
Production |
|
Total |
|
Percentage |
|
Proved |
|
Total |
|
|
(mcfe |
|
Production |
|
of Total |
|
Reserves |
|
Proved |
Area |
|
per day) |
|
(mcfe) |
|
Production |
|
(Mmcfe) |
|
Reserves |
Southwest |
|
|
235,289 |
|
|
|
86,115,662 |
|
|
|
61 |
% |
|
|
1,304,154 |
|
|
|
49 |
% |
Appalachia |
|
|
139,832 |
|
|
|
51,178,557 |
|
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
1,312,426 |
|
|
|
50 |
% |
Gulf Coast |
|
|
10,521 |
|
|
|
3,850,597 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
36,985 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
385,642 |
|
|
|
141,144,816 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
2,653,565 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
We have a single company-wide management team that administers all properties as a whole
rather than by discrete operating segments; therefore, segment reporting is not applicable to us.
We track only basic operational data by area. We do not maintain complete separate financial
statement information by area. We measure financial performance as a single enterprise and not on
an area-by-area basis.
Southwest Area
The Southwest Area conducts drilling, production and field operations in the Barnett Shale of
North Central Texas, the Permian Basin of West Texas and eastern New Mexico, and the East Texas
Basin, as well as in the Texas Panhandle and the Anadarko Basin of western Oklahoma. In the
Southwest Area, we own 2,308 net producing wells, 96% of which we operate. Our average working
interest is 72%. We have approximately 841,000 gross (547,000 net) acres under lease.
Total proved reserves increased 255.8 Bcfe, or 24%, at December 31, 2008 when compared to
year-end 2007. Production and an unfavorable reserve revision for lower prices was more than
offset by property purchases (95.6 Bcfe) and drilling additions (293.4 Bcfe). Annual production
increased 22% over 2007. During 2008, the region spent $536.2 million to drill 242 (209.8 net)
development wells, of which 237 (205.8 net) were productive, and 18 (14.0 net) exploratory wells,
of which 13 (11.1 net) were productive. During the year, the region achieved a 97% drilling
success rate.
At December 31, 2008, the Southwest Area had a development inventory of 552 proven drilling
locations and 352 proven recompletions. During the year, the Southwest Area drilled 88 proven
locations and added 263 new locations. Development projects include recompletions, infill drilling
and to a lesser extent, installation of secondary recovery projects. These activities also include
increasing reserves and production through cost control, upgrading lifting equipment, improving
gathering systems and surface facilities, and performing restimulations and refracturing
operations.
Appalachia Area
Our properties in this area are located in the Appalachian Basin in the northeastern United
States, principally in Pennsylvania, Ohio, New York, West Virginia and Virginia. The reserves
principally produce from the Pennsylvanian (coalbed formation), Upper Devonian, Medina, Clinton,
Queenston, Big Lime, Marcellus Shale, Niagaran Reef, Knox, Huntersville Chert, Oriskany and Trenton
Black River formations at depths ranging from 2,500 to 12,500 feet. Generally, after initial flush
production, most of these properties are characterized by gradual decline rates, typically
producing for 10 to 35 years. We own 10,278 net producing wells, 59% of which we operate, and
5,255 miles of gas gathering lines. Our average working interest is 73%. We have approximately
2.7 million gross (2.3 million net) acres under lease, which include 407,800 acres where we also
own a royalty interest.
Reserves at December 31, 2008 increased 162.3 Bcfe, or 14%, from 2007 due to drilling
additions (214.5 Bcfe) that were partially offset by production. Annual production increased 18%
over 2007. During 2008, the region spent $359.5 million to drill 361 (257.4 net) development
wells, all of which were productive, and 7.0 (5.0 net) exploratory wells, all of which were
productive. As a result, the region achieved a 100% drilling success rate. At December 31, 2008,
the Appalachia Area had an inventory of 3,800 proven drilling locations and 500 proven
recompletions. During the year, the Appalachia Area drilled 192 proven locations and added 519 new
locations.
Gulf Coast Area
The Gulf Coast properties are located onshore in Texas, Louisiana and Mississippi. Our major
fields produce from the Yegua formations at depths of 12,000 to 14,000 feet in the Upper Texas Gulf
Coast, the Upper Oligocene in South Louisiana at depths of 10,000 to 12,000 feet and the Sligo and
Hosston formations at depths of 15,000 to 16,500 feet in the Oakvale field in Mississippi. We have
approximately 116,000 gross (82,000 net) acres under lease. We own 18 net producing wells in this
Area, 88% of which we operate. Our average working interest is 47%.
Reserves increased 2.7 Bcfe, or 8%, from 2007 with drilling additions (10.5 Bcfe) partially
offset by an unfavorable reserve revision and production. On an annual basis, production increased
61% from 2007. During 2008, the region spent $34.3 million to drill 5.0 (3.7 net) development
wells, of which 4.0 (2.8 net) were productive, and 1.0 (0.3 net) exploratory well that was a dry
hole. During the year, the Gulf Coast Area had a 69% drilling success rate. At December 31, 2008,
the Gulf Coast Area had an inventory of 5 proven drilling locations and 10 proven recompletions.
17
Proved Reserves
The following table sets forth our estimated proved reserves at the end of each of the past
five years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Natural gas (Mmcf) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developed |
|
|
1,337,978 |
|
|
|
1,144,709 |
|
|
|
875,395 |
|
|
|
724,876 |
|
|
|
580,006 |
|
Undeveloped |
|
|
875,568 |
|
|
|
688,088 |
|
|
|
560,583 |
|
|
|
400,534 |
|
|
|
366,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
2,213,546 |
|
|
|
1,832,797 |
|
|
|
1,435,978 |
|
|
|
1,125,410 |
|
|
|
946,428 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and NGLs (Mbbls) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developed |
|
|
49,009 |
|
|
|
47,015 |
|
|
|
37,750 |
|
|
|
33,029 |
|
|
|
27,715 |
|
Undeveloped |
|
|
24,327 |
|
|
|
19,645 |
|
|
|
15,957 |
|
|
|
13,863 |
|
|
|
10,451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
73,336 |
|
|
|
66,660 |
|
|
|
53,707 |
|
|
|
46,892 |
|
|
|
38,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total (Mmcfe) (a) |
|
|
2,653,565 |
|
|
|
2,232,762 |
|
|
|
1,758,226 |
|
|
|
1,406,762 |
|
|
|
1,175,425 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Developed |
|
|
62 |
% |
|
|
64 |
% |
|
|
63 |
% |
|
|
66 |
% |
|
|
64 |
% |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Oil and NGLs are converted to mcfe at the rate of one barrel equals six
mcf. |
The following table sets forth summary information by area with respect to estimated proved
reserves at December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve Volumes |
|
|
PV-10 (a) |
|
|
|
Oil & NGL |
|
|
Natural Gas |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Mbbls) |
|
|
(Mmcf) |
|
|
(Mmcfe) |
|
|
% |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
% |
|
Southwest |
|
|
54,967 |
|
|
|
974,353 |
|
|
|
1,304,154 |
|
|
|
49 |
% |
|
$ |
1,819,212 |
|
|
|
54 |
% |
Appalachia |
|
|
17,582 |
|
|
|
1,206,933 |
|
|
|
1,312,426 |
|
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
1,493,961 |
|
|
|
44 |
% |
Gulf Coast |
|
|
787 |
|
|
|
32,260 |
|
|
|
36,985 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
87,073 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
73,336 |
|
|
|
2,213,546 |
|
|
|
2,653,565 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
3,400,246 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
PV-10 was prepared using prices in effect at the end of 2008, discounted at 10%
per annum. Year-end PV-10 may be considered a non-GAAP financial measure as defined by the
SEC. We believe that the presentation of PV-10 is relevant and useful to our investors as
supplemental disclosure to the standardized measure, or after tax amount, because it
presents the discounted future net cash flows attributable to our proved reserves prior to
taking into account future corporate income taxes and our current tax structure. While the
standardized measure is dependent on the unique tax situation of each company, PV-10 is
based on prices and discount factors that are consistent for all companies. Because of
this, PV-10 can be used within the industry and by creditors and securities analysts to
evaluate estimated net cash flows from proved reserves on a more comparable basis. The
difference between the standardized measure and the PV-10 amount is the discounted
estimated future income tax of $819.0 million at December 31, 2008. |
At year-end 2008, the following independent petroleum consultants reviewed our reserves:
DeGolyer and MacNaughton (Southwest and Gulf Coast), H.J. Gruy and Associates, Inc. (Southwest),
and Wright and Company, Inc. (Appalachia). These engineers were selected for their geographic
expertise and their historical experience in engineering certain properties. At December 31, 2008,
these consultants collectively reviewed approximately 87% of our proved reserves. All estimates of
oil and gas reserves are subject to uncertainty. Historical variances between our reserve
estimates and the aggregate estimates of our consultants have been less than 5%. We did not file
any reports during the year ended December 31, 2008 with any federal authority or agency with
respect to our estimates of oil and gas reserves.
18
The following table sets forth the estimated future net cash flows, excluding open hedging
contracts, from proved reserves, the present value of those net cash flows (PV-10), and the
expected benchmark prices and average field prices used in projecting net cash flows over the past
five years (in millions except prices):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Future net cash flows |
|
$ |
8,441 |
|
|
$ |
11,908 |
|
|
$ |
6,391 |
|
|
$ |
10,429 |
|
|
$ |
5,035 |
|
Present value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before income tax |
|
$ |
3,400 |
|
|
$ |
5,205 |
|
|
$ |
2,771 |
|
|
$ |
4,887 |
|
|
$ |
2,396 |
|
After income tax (Standardized Measure) |
|
$ |
2,581 |
|
|
$ |
3,666 |
|
|
$ |
2,002 |
|
|
$ |
3,384 |
|
|
$ |
1,749 |
|
Benchmark prices (NYMEX) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil price (per barrel) |
|
$ |
44.60 |
|
|
$ |
95.98 |
|
|
$ |
61.05 |
|
|
$ |
61.04 |
|
|
$ |
43.33 |
|
Gas price (per mcf) |
|
$ |
5.71 |
|
|
$ |
6.80 |
|
|
$ |
5.64 |
|
|
$ |
10.08 |
|
|
$ |
6.18 |
|
Wellhead prices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil price (per barrel) |
|
$ |
42.76 |
|
|
$ |
91.88 |
|
|
$ |
57.66 |
|
|
$ |
57.80 |
|
|
$ |
40.44 |
|
Gas price (per mcf) |
|
$ |
5.23 |
|
|
$ |
6.44 |
|
|
$ |
5.24 |
|
|
$ |
9.83 |
|
|
$ |
6.05 |
|
Future net cash flows represent projected revenues from the sale of proved reserves net of
production and development costs (including operating expenses and production taxes). Such
calculations, prepared in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 69,
Disclosures about Oil and Gas Producing Activities, are based on costs and prices in effect at
December 31 of each year, without escalation. There can be no assurance that the proved reserves
will be produced within the periods indicated or that prices and costs will remain constant. There
are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating reserves and related information and different
reservoir engineers often arrive at different estimates for the same properties.
Producing Wells
The following table sets forth information relating to productive wells at December 31, 2008.
We also own royalty interests in an additional 1,900 wells in which we do not own a working
interest. If we own both a royalty and a working interest in a well such interests are included in
the table below. Wells are classified as crude oil or gas according to their predominant
production stream. We do not have a significant number of dual completions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Total Wells |
|
|
Working |
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Net |
|
|
Interest |
|
Natural gas |
|
|
14,902 |
|
|
|
10,471 |
|
|
|
70 |
% |
Crude oil |
|
|
2,474 |
|
|
|
2,133 |
|
|
|
86 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
17,376 |
|
|
|
12,604 |
|
|
|
73 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The day-to-day operations of oil and gas properties are the responsibility of the operator
designated under pooling or operating agreements. The operator supervises production, maintains
production records, employs or contracts for field personnel and performs other functions. An
operator receives reimbursement for direct expenses incurred in the performance of its duties as
well as monthly per-well producing and drilling overhead reimbursement at rates customarily charged
by unaffiliated third parties. The charges customarily vary with the depth and location of the
well being operated.
Acreage
We own interests in developed and undeveloped oil and gas acreage. These ownership interests
generally take the form of working interests in oil and gas leases that have varying terms.
Developed acreage includes leased acreage that is allocated or assignable to producing wells or
wells capable of production even though shallower or deeper horizons may not have been fully
explored. Undeveloped acreage includes leased acres on which wells have not been drilled or
completed to a point that would permit the production of commercial quantities of natural gas or
oil, regardless of whether or not the acreage contains proved reserves.
19
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the developed and undeveloped
acreage in which we own a working interest as of December 31, 2008. Acreage related to royalty,
overriding royalty and other similar interests is excluded from this summary:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developed Acres |
|
|
Undeveloped Acres |
|
|
Total Acres |
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Net |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Net |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Net |
|
Alabama |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,914 |
|
|
|
61,679 |
|
|
|
72,914 |
|
|
|
61,679 |
|
Louisiana |
|
|
2,567 |
|
|
|
1,650 |
|
|
|
12,781 |
|
|
|
8,080 |
|
|
|
15,348 |
|
|
|
9,730 |
|
Michigan |
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
285 |
|
Mississippi |
|
|
5,064 |
|
|
|
2,706 |
|
|
|
18,973 |
|
|
|
6,940 |
|
|
|
24,037 |
|
|
|
9,646 |
|
New Mexico |
|
|
8,090 |
|
|
|
5,878 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,090 |
|
|
|
5,878 |
|
New York |
|
|
186,867 |
|
|
|
177,890 |
|
|
|
128,820 |
|
|
|
113,716 |
|
|
|
315,687 |
|
|
|
291,606 |
|
Ohio |
|
|
272,671 |
|
|
|
255,283 |
|
|
|
244,535 |
|
|
|
223,332 |
|
|
|
517,206 |
|
|
|
478,615 |
|
Oklahoma |
|
|
165,700 |
|
|
|
102,097 |
|
|
|
151,242 |
|
|
|
82,306 |
|
|
|
316,942 |
|
|
|
184,403 |
|
Pennsylvania |
|
|
496,804 |
|
|
|
443,785 |
|
|
|
831,010 |
|
|
|
725,946 |
|
|
|
1,327,814 |
|
|
|
1,169,731 |
|
Texas |
|
|
254,020 |
|
|
|
175,363 |
|
|
|
265,019 |
|
|
|
182,556 |
|
|
|
519,039 |
|
|
|
357,919 |
|
Virginia |
|
|
129,500 |
|
|
|
56,240 |
|
|
|
156,102 |
|
|
|
71,963 |
|
|
|
285,602 |
|
|
|
128,203 |
|
West Virginia |
|
|
81,700 |
|
|
|
50,178 |
|
|
|
130,908 |
|
|
|
125,218 |
|
|
|
212,608 |
|
|
|
175,396 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,603,145 |
|
|
|
1,271,232 |
|
|
|
2,012,427 |
|
|
|
1,601,859 |
|
|
|
3,615,572 |
|
|
|
2,873,091 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average working interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
79 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
80 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
79 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undeveloped Acreage Expirations
The table below summarizes by year our undeveloped acreage scheduled to expire in the next
five years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acres |
|
% of Total |
As of December 31, |
|
Gross |
|
Net |
|
Undeveloped |
2009 |
|
351,165 |
|
257,926 |
|
15% |
2010 |
|
249,046 |
|
196,864 |
|
12% |
2011 |
|
352,510 |
|
290,392 |
|
17% |
2012 |
|
222,361 |
|
201,357 |
|
12% |
2013 |
|
136,219 |
|
124,997 |
|
7% |
We have lease acreage that is generally subject to lease expiration if initial wells are not
drilled within a specified period, generally not exceeding two years. We do not expect to lose
significant lease acreage because of failure to drill due to inadequate capital, equipment or
personnel. However, based on our evaluation of prospective economics, we have allowed acreage to
expire and will allow additional acreage to expire in the future.
Drilling Results
The following table summarizes drilling activity for the past three years. Gross wells
reflect the sum of all wells in which we own an interest. Net wells reflect the sum of our working
interests in gross wells. As of December 31, 2008, we were in the process of drilling 44 gross
(29.0 net) wells.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Net |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Net |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Net |
|
Development wells |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Productive |
|
|
602.0 |
|
|
|
466.0 |
|
|
|
942.0 |
|
|
|
680.5 |
|
|
|
992.0 |
|
|
|
689.7 |
|
Dry |
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
Exploratory wells |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Productive |
|
|
20.0 |
|
|
|
16.1 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
Dry |
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
Total wells |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Productive |
|
|
622.0 |
|
|
|
482.1 |
|
|
|
953.0 |
|
|
|
686.8 |
|
|
|
1,004.0 |
|
|
|
696.6 |
|
Dry |
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
14.0 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
634.0 |
|
|
|
490.2 |
|
|
|
967.0 |
|
|
|
698.2 |
|
|
|
1,017.0 |
|
|
|
703.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Success ratio |
|
|
98 |
% |
|
|
98 |
% |
|
|
99 |
% |
|
|
98 |
% |
|
|
99 |
% |
|
|
99 |
% |
20
Title to Properties
We believe that we have satisfactory title to all of our producing properties in accordance
with generally accepted industry standards. As is customary in the industry, in the case of
undeveloped properties, often minimal investigation of record title is made at the time of lease
acquisition. Investigations are made before the consummation of an acquisition of producing
properties and before commencement of drilling operations on undeveloped properties. Individual
properties may be subject to burdens that we believe do not materially interfere with the use or
affect the value of the properties. Burdens on properties may include:
|
|
|
customary royalty interests; |
|
|
|
|
liens incident to operating agreements and for current taxes; |
|
|
|
|
obligations or duties under applicable laws; |
|
|
|
|
development obligations under oil and gas leases; or |
|
|
|
|
net profit interests. |
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We have been named as a defendant in a number of legal actions arising in the ordinary course
of business. In the opinion of management, such litigation and claims are likely to be resolved
without a material adverse effect on our financial position or liquidity, although an unfavorable
outcome could have a material adverse effect on the operations of a given interim period or year.
See also Note 14 to our consolidated financial statements.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
There were no matters submitted to a vote of our security holders during fourth quarter 2008.
PART II
|
|
|
ITEM 5. |
|
MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES |
Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) under the symbol RRC.
During 2008, trading volume averaged 3.3 million shares per day. In 2007, we were selected to be
included in the S&P 500 Index. The following table shows the quarterly high and low sale prices
and cash dividends declared as reported on the NYSE composite tape for the past two years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends |
|
|
High |
|
Low |
|
Declared |
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter |
|
$ |
33.80 |
|
|
$ |
25.59 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
Second quarter |
|
|
40.50 |
|
|
|
33.40 |
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
Third quarter |
|
|
41.87 |
|
|
|
33.28 |
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
Fourth quarter |
|
|
51.88 |
|
|
|
37.17 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter |
|
$ |
65.53 |
|
|
$ |
43.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
Second quarter |
|
|
76.81 |
|
|
|
61.13 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
Third quarter |
|
|
72.98 |
|
|
|
37.34 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
Fourth quarter |
|
|
44.15 |
|
|
|
23.77 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
Between January 1, 2009 and February 19, 2009, the common stock traded at prices between
$31.19 and $41.80 per share. Our senior subordinated notes are not listed on an exchange, but
trade over-the-counter.
21
Holders of Record
On February 19, 2009, there were approximately 1,652 holders of record of our common stock.
Dividends
The payment of dividends is subject to declaration by the Board of Directors and depends on
earnings, capital expenditures and various other factors. The bank credit facility and our senior
subordinated notes allow for the payment of common and preferred dividends, with certain
limitations. The determination of the amount of future dividends, if any, to be declared and paid
is at the sole discretion of our board and will depend upon our level of earnings and capital
expenditures and other matters that the Board of Directors deems relevant. For more information,
see information set forth in Item 7 of this report Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
We have a repurchase program approved by the Board of Directors in 2008 for the repurchase of
up to $10.0 million of common stock based on market conditions and opportunities. There were no
repurchases during fourth quarter 2008. As of December 31, 2008, we have $6.8 million remaining
under this authorization.
Stockholder Return Performance Presentation*
The following graph is included in accordance with the SECs executive compensation disclosure
rules. This historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock
performance. The graph compares the change in the cumulative total return of Ranges common stock,
the Dow Jones U.S. Exploration and Production Index, and the S&P 500 Index for the five years ended
December 31, 2008. The graph assumes that $100 was invested in the Companys common stock and each
index on December 31, 2003.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
Range Resources Corporation |
|
$ |
100 |
|
|
$ |
217 |
|
|
$ |
418 |
|
|
$ |
436 |
|
|
$ |
815 |
|
|
$ |
546 |
|
DJ U.S. Expl. & Prod. Index |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
344 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
S&P 500 Index |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
The performance graph and the information contained in this section is not soliciting material,
is being furnished not filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any
of our filings under the Securities Act or the Exchange
Act whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation
language contained in such filing. |
22
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table shows selected financial information for the five years ended December 31,
2008. Significant producing property acquisitions in 2006 and 2004 affect the comparability of
year-to-year financial and operating data. In March 2007, we sold our Gulf of Mexico properties
for proceeds of $155.0 million. Accordingly, the financial and statistical data contained in the
following discussion reflects our Gulf of Mexico operations as discontinued operations. All
weighted average shares and per share data have been adjusted for the three-for-two stock split
effected December 2, 2005. This information should be read in conjunction with Item 7 of this
report Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and
our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this report.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data) |
|
Balance Sheet Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets (a) |
|
$ |
404,311 |
|
|
$ |
261,814 |
|
|
$ |
388,925 |
|
|
$ |
207,977 |
|
|
$ |
136,336 |
|
Current liabilities (b) |
|
|
353,514 |
|
|
|
305,433 |
|
|
|
251,685 |
|
|
|
321,760 |
|
|
|
177,162 |
|
Oil and gas properties, net |
|
|
4,852,710 |
|
|
|
3,503,808 |
|
|
|
2,608,088 |
|
|
|
1,679,593 |
|
|
|
1,340,077 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
5,562,543 |
|
|
|
4,016,508 |
|
|
|
3,187,674 |
|
|
|
2,018,985 |
|
|
|
1,595,406 |
|
Bank debt |
|
|
693,000 |
|
|
|
303,500 |
|
|
|
452,000 |
|
|
|
269,200 |
|
|
|
423,900 |
|
Subordinated notes |
|
|
1,097,562 |
|
|
|
847,158 |
|
|
|
596,782 |
|
|
|
346,948 |
|
|
|
196,656 |
|
Stockholders equity (c) |
|
|
2,457,833 |
|
|
|
1,728,022 |
|
|
|
1,256,161 |
|
|
|
696,923 |
|
|
|
566,340 |
|
Weighted average dilutive shares outstanding |
|
|
155,943 |
|
|
|
149,911 |
|
|
|
138,711 |
|
|
|
129,125 |
|
|
|
97,998 |
|
Cash dividends declared per common share |
|
|
0.16 |
|
|
|
0.13 |
|
|
|
0.09 |
|
|
|
.0599 |
|
|
|
.0267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided from operating activities |
|
$ |
824,767 |
|
|
$ |
642,291 |
|
|
$ |
479,875 |
|
|
$ |
325,745 |
|
|
$ |
209,249 |
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
1,731,777 |
|
|
|
1,020,572 |
|
|
|
911,659 |
|
|
|
432,377 |
|
|
|
624,301 |
|
Net cash provided from financing activities |
|
|
903,745 |
|
|
|
379,917 |
|
|
|
429,416 |
|
|
|
93,000 |
|
|
|
432,803 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
2007 included deferred tax assets of $26.9 million compared to $61.7 million in 2005
and $26.3 million in 2004. 2008 includes $221.4 million unrealized derivative assets compared
to $53.0 million in 2007 and $93.6 million in 2006. |
|
(b) |
|
2008 includes unrealized derivative liabilities of $10,000 compared to $30.5 million
in 2007, $4.6 million in 2006, $160.1 million in 2005 and $61.0 million in 2004. 2008
includes $33.0 million of deferred tax liabilities. |
|
(c) |
|
Stockholders equity includes other comprehensive income (loss) of $77.5 million in
2008 compared to ($26.8 million) in 2007, $36.5 million in 2006, ($147.1 million) in 2005 and
($43.3 million) in 2004. |
23
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data) |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and gas sales |
|
$ |
1,226,560 |
|
|
$ |
862,537 |
|
|
$ |
599,139 |
|
|
$ |
495,470 |
|
|
$ |
278,903 |
|
Transportation and gathering |
|
|
4,577 |
|
|
|
2,290 |
|
|
|
2,422 |
|
|
|
2,306 |
|
|
|
2,002 |
|
Loss on retirement of securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
Derivative fair value income (loss) |
|
|
70,135 |
|
|
|
(7,767 |
) |
|
|
142,395 |
|
|
|
10,303 |
|
|
|
614 |
|
Other |
|
|
21,675 |
|
|
|
5,031 |
|
|
|
856 |
|
|
|
1,024 |
|
|
|
1,588 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
1,322,947 |
|
|
|
862,091 |
|
|
|
744,812 |
|
|
|
509,103 |
|
|
|
283,068 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct operating |
|
|
142,387 |
|
|
|
107,499 |
|
|
|
81,261 |
|
|
|
57,866 |
|
|
|
39,419 |
|
Production and ad valorem taxes |
|
|
55,172 |
|
|
|
42,443 |
|
|
|
36,415 |
|
|
|
30,822 |
|
|
|
19,845 |
|
Exploration |
|
|
67,690 |
|
|
|
43,345 |
|
|
|
44,088 |
|
|
|
29,529 |
|
|
|
12,619 |
|
Abandonment and impairment
of unproved properties |
|
|
47,906 |
|
|
|
6,750 |
|
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
623 |
|
|
|
1,161 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
92,308 |
|
|
|
69,670 |
|
|
|
49,886 |
|
|
|
33,444 |
|
|
|
20,634 |
|
Deferred compensation plan |
|
|
(24,689 |
) |
|
|
28,332 |
|
|
|
6,873 |
|
|
|
29,474 |
|
|
|
19,176 |
|
Interest expense and dividends
on trust preferred |
|
|
99,748 |
|
|
|
77,737 |
|
|
|
55,849 |
|
|
|
37,619 |
|
|
|
22,437 |
|
Depletion, depreciation and
amortization |
|
|
299,831 |
|
|
|
220,578 |
|
|
|
154,482 |
|
|
|
113,741 |
|
|
|
79,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
780,353 |
|
|
|
596,354 |
|
|
|
429,111 |
|
|
|
333,118 |
|
|
|
214,758 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
542,594 |
|
|
|
265,737 |
|
|
|
315,701 |
|
|
|
175,985 |
|
|
|
68,310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
4,268 |
|
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
1,912 |
|
|
|
1,071 |
|
|
|
(245 |
) |
Deferred |
|
|
192,168 |
|
|
|
98,441 |
|
|
|
119,840 |
|
|
|
64,809 |
|
|
|
25,327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
196,436 |
|
|
|
98,761 |
|
|
|
121,752 |
|
|
|
65,880 |
|
|
|
25,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
346,158 |
|
|
|
166,976 |
|
|
|
193,949 |
|
|
|
110,105 |
|
|
|
43,228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations, net of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,593 |
|
|
|
(35,247 |
) |
|
|
906 |
|
|
|
(997 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
346,158 |
|
|
|
230,569 |
|
|
|
158,702 |
|
|
|
111,011 |
|
|
|
42,231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,163 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common stockholders |
|
$ |
346,158 |
|
|
$ |
230,569 |
|
|
$ |
158,702 |
|
|
$ |
111,011 |
|
|
$ |
37,068 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income from continuing
operations |
|
$ |
2.29 |
|
|
$ |
1.16 |
|
|
$ |
1.45 |
|
|
$ |
0.89 |
|
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.44 |
|
|
|
(0.26 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
net income |
|
$ |
2.29 |
|
|
$ |
1.60 |
|
|
$ |
1.19 |
|
|
$ |
0.89 |
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income from continuing
operations |
|
$ |
2.22 |
|
|
$ |
1.11 |
|
|
$ |
1.39 |
|
|
$ |
0.85 |
|
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.43 |
|
|
|
(0.25 |
) |
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
net income |
|
$ |
2.22 |
|
|
$ |
1.54 |
|
|
$ |
1.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.86 |
|
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
ITEM 7. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS |
The following discussion is intended to assist you in understanding our business and results
of operations together with our present financial condition. This section should be read in
conjunction with Item 6, Selected Financial Data and our consolidated financial statements and
the accompanying notes included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
Statements in our discussion may be forward-looking. These forward-looking statements involve
risks and uncertainties. We caution that a number of factors could cause future production,
revenues and expenses to differ materially from our expectations. See Disclosures Regarding
Forward-Looking Statements at the beginning of this Annual Report and Risk Factors in Item 1A
for additional discussion of some of these factors and risks.
Overview of Our Business
We are an independent oil and gas company engaged in the exploration, development and
acquisition of oil and gas properties, primarily in the Southwestern, Appalachian and Gulf Coast
regions of the United States. We operate in one segment. We have a single company-wide management
team that administers all properties as a whole rather than by discrete operating segments. We
track only basic operational data by area. We do not maintain complete separate financial
statement information by area. We measure financial performance as a single enterprise and not on
an area-by-area basis.
Our strategy is to increase reserves and production through internally generated drilling
projects coupled with complementary acquisitions. Our revenues, profitability and future growth
depend substantially on prevailing prices for oil and gas and on our ability to find, develop and
acquire oil and gas reserves that are economically recoverable. We use the successful efforts
method of accounting for our oil and gas activities. Our corporate headquarters are in Fort Worth,
Texas.
Industry Environment
We operate entirely within the United States, a mature region for the exploration and
production of oil and gas. Although new discoveries of oil and gas occur in the United States,
because it is a mature region, the size and frequency of these discoveries is generally declining,
while finding and development costs are increasing. We believe that there remain areas of the
United States, such as the Appalachian Basin and certain areas in our Southwest and Gulf Coast
Areas that are underexplored or have not been fully explored and developed with the benefit of
newly available exploration and production reservoir enhancement technology. Examples of such
technology include advanced 3-D seismic processing, hydraulic reservoir fracture stimulation,
advances in well logging and analysis, horizontal drilling and completion techniques, secondary and
tertiary recovery practices, and automated remote well monitoring and control devices.
Oil and gas are commodities. The price that we receive for the natural gas we produce is
largely a function of market supply and demand. Demand for natural gas in the United States
increased dramatically during this decade; however, the current economic slowdown has reduced this
demand over the second half of 2008 and is continuing into 2009. Demand is impacted by general
economic conditions, weather and other seasonal conditions, including hurricanes and tropical
storms. Over or under supply of natural gas can result in substantial price volatility.
Historically, commodity prices have been volatile and we expect the volatility to continue in the
future. Factors impacting the future supply balance are the growth in domestic gas production and
the increase in the United States LNG import capacity. Significant LNG capacity increases have
been announced which may allow for more LNG imports resulting in increased price volatility. A
substantial or extended decline in oil and gas prices or poor drilling results could have a
material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, cash flows, quantities of
oil and gas reserves that may be economically produced and our ability to access capital markets.
Realized oil and gas average prices increased from 2007 to 2008. As a result of narrowing
excess worldwide capacity, weakness in the dollar, and continuing tension in the Middle East, oil
reached a record price of $147.00 per Bbl in July 2008. However, rising crude oil supplies, the
tightened credit markets and lower demand in the slowing U.S and global economies have caused
recent oil prices to decline. Oil prices are expected to remain volatile. Although our average
realized price (including all derivative settlements) received for oil and gas was $8.58 per mcfe
in the year ended December 31, 2008, prices were bolstered by record oil prices in the first half
of the year. In fourth quarter 2008, our average realized price (including all derivative
settlements) declined to $6.86 per mcfe. In a trend that began in the fourth quarter of 2008 and
has continued into 2009, the industry has experienced deteriorating basis differentials in the
Midcontinent and West Texas areas primarily caused by an over-supply of gas in these regions.
25
Capital Budget for 2009
Our capital budget for 2009 is currently set at $700.0 million, excluding acquisitions. The
2009 capital budget is less than the 2008 capital spending levels due
to lower expected operating cash flows resulting from declining oil
and gas prices.
For 2009, we expect
our cash flow to fund our capital budget. As has been our historical practice, we will
periodically review our capital expenditures throughout the year and adjust the budget based on
commodity prices and drilling success.
Source of Our Revenues
We derive our revenues from the sale of oil and gas that is produced from our properties.
Revenues are a function of the volume produced, the prevailing market price at the time of sale,
quality, Btu content and transportation costs to market. Production volumes and the price of oil
and gas are the primary factors affecting our revenues. To achieve more predictable cash flows and
to reduce our exposure to downward price fluctuations, we use derivative instruments to hedge
future sales prices on a significant portion of our gas and oil production. During 2008 and 2006,
the use of derivative instruments prevented us from realizing the full benefit of upward price
movements and may do so in future periods. Our average realized price
calculations (including all derivative settlements) include both
the effects of the settlement of derivative contracts that are accounted for as hedges and the
settlement of derivative contracts that are not accounted for as hedges.
Principal Components of Our Cost Structure
|
|
|
Direct Operating Expenses. These are day-to-day costs incurred to bring hydrocarbons
out of the ground and to the market together with the daily costs incurred to maintain our
producing properties. Such costs also include maintenance, repairs and workovers expenses
related to our oil and gas properties. These costs are expected to moderate in 2009 as we
expect industry demand for these services to decline. Direct operating expenses also
include stock-based compensation expense (non-cash) associated with equity grants of stock
appreciation rights (SARs) and the amortization of restricted stock grants as part of
employee compensation. |
|
|
|
|
Production and Ad Valorem Taxes. Production taxes are paid on produced oil and gas
based on a percentage of market prices (not hedged prices) or at fixed rates established by
federal, state or local taxing authorities. Ad valorem taxes are taxes generally based on
reserve values at the end of each year. |
|
|
|
|
Exploration Expense. These are geological and geophysical costs, including payroll and
benefits for the geological and geophysical staff, seismic costs, delay rentals and the
costs of unsuccessful exploratory dry holes. Exploration expense includes stock-based
compensation expense (non-cash) associated with equity grants of SARs and the amortization
of restricted stock grants as part of employee compensation. |
|
|
|
|
General and Administrative Expense. These costs include overhead, including payroll and
benefits for our corporate staff, costs of maintaining our headquarters, costs of managing
our production and development operations, franchise taxes, audit and other professional
fees and legal compliance are included in general and administrative expense. General and
administrative expense includes stock-based compensation expense (non-cash) associated with
equity grants of SARs and the amortization of restricted stock grants as part of employee
compensation. |
|
|
|
|
Abandonment and impairment of unproved properties. This category includes unproved
property impairment and costs associated with lease expirations. |
|
|
|
|
Interest. We typically finance a portion of our working capital requirements and
acquisitions with borrowings under our bank credit facility and with our longer-term debt
securities. As a result, we incur substantial interest expense that is affected by both
fluctuations in interest rates and our financing decisions. We will likely continue to
incur significant interest expense as we continue to grow. We expect our 2009 capital
budget to be funded primarily with internal cash flow. |
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization. This includes the systematic expensing of the
capitalized costs incurred to acquire, explore and develop gas and oil. As a successful
efforts company, we capitalize all costs associated with our acquisition and development
efforts and all successful exploration efforts, and apportion these costs to each unit of
production through depreciation, depletion and amortization expense. This expense also
includes the systematic, monthly accretion of the future abandonment costs of tangible
assets such as wells, service assets, pipelines, and other facilities. |
|
|
|
|
Income Taxes. We are subject to state and federal income taxes but are currently not in
a tax paying position for regular federal income taxes, primarily due to the current
deductibility of intangible drilling costs (IDC). We do pay some state income taxes
where our IDC deductions do not exceed our taxable income or where state income taxes are
determined on another basis. Currently, substantially all of our federal taxes are
deferred; however, at some point, we anticipate using all of our net operating loss
carryforwards and we will recognize current income tax expense and continue to recognize
current tax expense as long as we are generating taxable income. |
26
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Income and Operations
Overview of 2008 Results
During 2008, we achieved the following results:
|
|
|
Achieved 21% production growth and 19% reserve growth; |
|
|
|
|
Drilled 490 net wells with a 98% success rate; |
|
|
|
|
Continued expansion of emerging plays; |
|
|
|
|
Posted record financial results and maintained a strong balance sheet; |
|
|
|
|
Completed acquisitions of properties containing 95.6 Bcfe of
proved reserves; and |
|
|
|
|
Completed $68.2 million of asset sales. |
Our 2008 performance reflects another year of successfully executing our strategy of growth
through drilling supplemented by complementary acquisitions. The business of exploring for,
developing, and acquiring oil and gas is highly competitive and capital intensive. As in any
commodity business, the costs associated with finding, acquiring, extracting, and financing our
operations are critical to profitability and long-term value creation for stockholders. Generating
meaningful growth while containing costs presents an ongoing challenge. During the recent period
of historically high oil and gas prices, drilling service and operating costs generally increased
due to increased competition for goods and services. Prices for oil and gas dramatically declined
in the last half of 2008 and we are presently experiencing reductions in service costs which vary
by region. We faced other challenges in 2008 including attracting and retaining qualified
personnel, consummating and integrating acquisitions, accessing the capital markets to fund our
growth on sufficiently favorable terms and introducing new oil and gas extraction technologies into
new regions and projects such as the Pennsylvania Marcellus Shale. We have continued to expand and
improve the technical staff through the hiring of additional experienced professionals. Our
inventory of exploration and development prospects continues to be strong, providing new growth
opportunities, greater diversification of technical risk and better efficiency.
Total revenues increased 53% in 2008 over the same period of 2007. This increase is due to
higher production and higher realized oil and gas prices. Our 2008 production growth is due to the
continued success of our drilling program and to acquisitions completed in 2006 and 2007. Average
realized prices (including all derivative settlements) were 7% higher in 2008, although realized
prices declined sharply in the last half of 2008. As discussed in Item 1A of this report, significant
changes in oil and gas prices can have a material impact on our balance sheet and our results of
operations, including the fair value of our derivatives.
All of our expenses have increased on both an absolute and per mcfe basis when compared to
2007, due to higher overall industry costs, higher compensation expense resulting from additional
employees, increased salaries and higher levels of activity. While overall costs were higher, the
rate of inflation experienced in our industry has moderated for some goods and services
as commodity prices weakened. The availability of goods and services continues to be mixed, based
on region and service company expertise. We continue to experience competition for
technical and experienced personnel and overall compensation
inflation in our industry has moderated. It is difficult for us to forecast price trends, supply, service or personnel
availability, any of which, if changed in an adverse manner, would significantly impact both
operating costs and capital expenditures. As we continue to have Marcellus wells shut-in waiting
on pipeline and processing facilities and we continue to expand our Marcellus operating team to
meet the needs of this developing asset, we expect to see continued upward pressure on our cost
structure. The initial phase of the pipeline and processing infrastructure was completed in fourth
quarter 2008 with additional expansions set for 2009 and later.
27
Oil and Gas Sales, Production and Realized Price Calculations
Our oil and gas sales vary from year to year as a result of changes in realized commodity
prices and production volumes. Hedges included in oil and gas sales reflect settlements on those
derivatives that qualify for hedge accounting. Cash settlement of derivative contracts that are
not accounted for as hedges are included in the income statement caption called Derivative fair
value income (loss). Oil and gas sales increased 42% from 2007 due to a 21% increase in
production and a 17% increase in realized prices. Oil and gas sales in 2007 increased 44% from
2006 due to a 22% increase in production and an 18% increase in realized prices. The following
table illustrates the primary components of oil and gas sales for each of the last three years (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Oil and Gas Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil wellhead |
|
$ |
298,482 |
|
|
$ |
226,686 |
|
|
$ |
189,516 |
|
Oil hedges realized |
|
|
(72,135 |
) |
|
|
(23,755 |
) |
|
|
(45,265 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total oil revenue |
|
$ |
226,347 |
|
|
$ |
202,931 |
|
|
$ |
144,251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas wellhead |
|
$ |
923,160 |
|
|
$ |
585,538 |
|
|
$ |
466,099 |
|
Gas hedges realized |
|
|
8,561 |
|
|
|
27,916 |
|
|
|
(47,916 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gas revenue |
|
$ |
931,721 |
|
|
$ |
613,454 |
|
|
$ |
418,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total NGL revenue |
|
$ |
68,492 |
|
|
$ |
46,152 |
|
|
$ |
36,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined wellhead |
|
$ |
1,290,134 |
|
|
$ |
858,376 |
|
|
$ |
692,320 |
|
Combined hedges |
|
|
(63,574 |
) |
|
|
4,161 |
|
|
|
(93,181 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total oil and gas sales |
|
$ |
1,226,560 |
|
|
$ |
862,537 |
|
|
$ |
599,139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our production continues to grow through drilling success as we place new wells into
production and through additions from acquisitions, partially offset by the natural decline of our
oil and gas wells and asset sales. For 2008, our production volumes increased 18% in our Appalachia Area,
increased 22% in our Southwest Area and increased 61% in our Gulf Coast Area. For 2007, our
production volumes increased 15% in our Appalachia Area, increased 28% in our Southwest Area and
declined 17% in our Gulf Coast Area. For 2006, our production volumes increased 10% in our
Appalachia Area, increased 29% in our Southwest Area and declined 36% in our Gulf Coast Area. Our
production for each of the last three years is set forth in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Production |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude oil (bbls) |
|
|
3,084,529 |
|
|
|
3,359,668 |
|
|
|
3,039,150 |
|
NGLs (bbls) |
|
|
1,385,701 |
|
|
|
1,114,730 |
|
|
|
1,091,785 |
|
Natural gas (mcf) |
|
|
114,323,436 |
|
|
|
89,594,626 |
|
|
|
70,712,770 |
|
Total (mcfe) (a) |
|
|
141,144,816 |
|
|
|
116,441,014 |
|
|
|
95,498,380 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average daily production |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude oil (bbls) |
|
|
8,428 |
|
|
|
9,205 |
|
|
|
8,326 |
|
NGLs (bbls) |
|
|
3,786 |
|
|
|
3,054 |
|
|
|
2,991 |
|
Natural gas (mcf) |
|
|
312,359 |
|
|
|
245,465 |
|
|
|
193,734 |
|
Total (mcfe) (a) |
|
|
385,642 |
|
|
|
319,016 |
|
|
|
261,639 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Oil and NGLs are converted to mcfe at the rate of one barrel equals
six mcf. |
28
Our average realized price (including all derivative settlements) received for oil and gas
during 2008 was $8.58 per mcfe compared to $8.02 per mcfe in 2007 and $6.80 per mcfe in 2006. Our
average realized price (including all derivative settlements) calculation includes all cash
settlements for derivatives, whether or not they qualify for hedge accounting. Average price
calculations for each of the last three years is shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Average Prices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average sales prices (wellhead): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude oil (per bbl) |
|
$ |
96.77 |
|
|
$ |
67.47 |
|
|
$ |
62.36 |
|
NGLs (per bbl) |
|
$ |
49.43 |
|
|
$ |
41.40 |
|
|
$ |
33.62 |
|
Natural gas (per mcf) |
|
$ |
8.07 |
|
|
$ |
6.54 |
|
|
$ |
6.59 |
|
Total (per mcfe) (a) |
|
$ |
9.14 |
|
|
$ |
7.37 |
|
|
$ |
7.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
realized prices (including derivatives that qualify for hedge accounting): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude oil (per bbl) |
|
$ |
73.38 |
|
|
$ |
60.40 |
|
|
$ |
47.46 |
|
NGLs (per bbl) |
|
$ |
49.43 |
|
|
$ |
41.40 |
|
|
$ |
33.62 |
|
Natural gas (per mcf) |
|
$ |
8.15 |
|
|
$ |
6.85 |
|
|
$ |
5.91 |
|
Total (per mcfe) (a) |
|
$ |
8.69 |
|
|
$ |
7.41 |
|
|
$ |
6.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average realized prices (including all derivative settlements): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude oil (per bbl) |
|
$ |
68.20 |
|
|
$ |
60.16 |
|
|
$ |
47.46 |
|
NGLs (per bbl) |
|
$ |
49.43 |
|
|
$ |
41.40 |
|
|
$ |
33.62 |
|
Natural gas (per mcf) |
|
$ |
8.15 |
|
|
$ |
7.66 |
|
|
$ |
6.62 |
|
Total (per mcfe) (a) |
|
$ |
8.58 |
|
|
$ |
8.02 |
|
|
$ |
6.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average NYMEX prices (b): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude oil (per bbl) |
|
$ |
100.47 |
|
|
$ |
72.34 |
|
|
$ |
66.22 |
|
Natural gas (per mcf) |
|
$ |
8.91 |
|
|
$ |
6.92 |
|
|
$ |
7.26 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Oil and NGLs are converted at the rate of one barrel equals six mcf. |
|
(b) |
|
Based on average of bid week prompt month prices. |
29
Derivative fair value income (loss) increased to a gain of $70.1 million in 2008 compared to a
loss of $7.8 million in 2007 and a gain of $142.4 million in 2006. Some of our derivatives do not
qualify for hedge accounting but are, to a degree, an economic offset to our commodity price
exposure. These contracts are accounted for using the mark-to-market accounting method whereby all
realized and unrealized gains and losses related to these contracts are included in Derivative
fair value income (loss) in the revenue section of our statement of operations. Mark-to-market
accounting treatment creates volatility in our revenues as gains and losses from derivatives are
included in total revenues and are not included in our balance sheet in Accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss). As commodity prices increase or decrease, such changes will have an
opposite effect on the mark-to-market value of our derivatives. Because oil and gas prices declined
dramatically in the last half of 2008, our derivatives became comparatively more valuable.
However, we expect these gains will be offset by lower wellhead revenues in the future.
We have also entered into basis swap agreements to limit volatility caused by changing
differentials between index and regional prices received. Basis swaps do not qualify for hedge
accounting purposes and are marked to market. Hedge ineffectiveness, also included in Derivative
fair value income (loss), is associated with our hedging contracts that qualify for hedge
accounting under SFAS No. 133.
The following table presents information about the components of derivative fair value income
(loss) for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Change in fair value of derivatives that do not qualify for hedge
accounting (a) |
|
$ |
83,867 |
|
|
$ |
(78,769 |
) |
|
$ |
86,491 |
|
Realized (loss) gain on settlements gas (b) (c) |
|
|
(1,383 |
) |
|
|
71,098 |
|
|
|
49,939 |
|
Realized loss on settlements oil (b) (c) |
|
|
(15,431 |
) |
|
|
(244 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Hedge ineffectiveness realized (c) |
|
|
1,386 |
|
|
|
968 |
|
|
|
|
|
unrealized (a) |
|
|
1,696 |
|
|
|
(820 |
) |
|
|
5,965 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative fair value income (loss) |
|
$ |
70,135 |
|
|
$ |
(7,767 |
) |
|
$ |
142,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
These amounts are unrealized and are not included in average sales price calculations. |
|
(b) |
|
These amounts represent realized gains and losses on settled derivatives that do not
qualify for hedge accounting. |
|
(c) |
|
These settlements are included in average realized price calculations (including all
derivative settlements). |
Other revenue increased in 2008 to $21.7 million compared to $5.0 million in 2007 and $856,000
in 2006. The 2008 period includes a $20.2 million gain on the sale of assets and a loss from
equity method investments of $218,000. The 2007 period includes income from equity method
investments of $974,000 and other miscellaneous income. The 2006 period includes income from
equity method investments of $548,000.
Our costs have increased as we continue to grow. We believe some of our expense fluctuations
are best analyzed on a unit-of-production, or per mcfe, basis. The following presents information
about certain of our expenses on a per mcfe basis for 2008, 2007 and 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
Year Ended |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
% Change |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Change |
|
% Change |
Direct operating expense |
|
$ |
1.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.92 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
$ |
0.92 |
|
|
$ |
0.85 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
Production and ad valorem tax expense |
|
|
0.39 |
|
|
|
0.36 |
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
0.36 |
|
|
|
0.38 |
|
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
5 |
% |
General and administrative expense |
|
|
0.65 |
|
|
|
0.60 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
0.60 |
|
|
|
0.52 |
|
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
Interest expense |
|
|
0.71 |
|
|
|
0.67 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
0.67 |
|
|
|
0.58 |
|
|
|
0.09 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
Depletion, depreciation and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
amortization expense |
|
|
2.12 |
|
|
|
1.89 |
|
|
|
0.23 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
1.89 |
|
|
|
1.62 |
|
|
|
0.27 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
30
Direct operating expense was $142.4 million in 2008 compared to $107.5 million in 2007 and
$81.3 million in 2006 due to higher oilfield service costs and higher volumes. Our operating
expenses are increasing as we add new wells from development and acquisitions and maintain
production from our existing properties. We incurred $9.9 million of workover costs in 2008
compared to $7.1 million in 2007 and $3.5 million in 2006. On a per mcfe basis, direct operating
expenses for 2008 increased $0.09 or 10% from the same period of 2007 with the increase consisting
primarily of higher workover costs ($0.01 per mcfe), higher personnel and related costs ($0.02 per
mcfe) along with higher equipment leasing costs ($0.02 per mcfe) and higher overall industry costs. On a per
mcfe basis, direct operating expenses for 2007 increased $0.07 or 8% from the same period of 2006
with the increase consisting primarily of higher workover costs ($0.02 per mcfe), higher water
disposal costs ($0.02 per mcfe), higher well services and equipment costs ($0.04 per mcfe) and a
$0.01 per mcfe increase in stock-based compensation. Stock-based compensation expense represents
the amortization of our grants of restricted stock and SARs as part of employee compensation. The
following table summarizes direct operating expenses per mcfe for 2008, 2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
%
Change |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
Lease operating expense |
|
$ |
0.92 |
|
|
$ |
0.84 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
$ |
0.84 |
|
|
$ |
0.80 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
Workovers |
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
0.06 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
0.06 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
50 |
% |
Stock-based compensation (non-cash) |
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total direct operating expenses |
|
$ |
1.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.92 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
$ |
0.92 |
|
|
$ |
0.85 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production and ad valorem taxes are paid based on market prices and not hedged prices. These
costs were $55.2 million in 2008 compared to $42.4 million in 2007 and $36.4 million in 2006. On a
per mcfe basis, production and ad valorem taxes increased to $0.39 in 2008 from $0.36 in the same
period of 2007, primarily due to a 24% increase in pre-hedge prices. On a per mcfe basis,
production and ad valorem taxes decreased to $0.36 in 2007 from $0.38 in 2006 with lower ad valorem
taxes per mcfe due to lower property tax rates in Texas as a result of the new margin tax.
General and administrative expense was $92.3 million for 2008 compared to $69.7 million in
2007 and $49.9 million in 2006. The 2008 increase of $22.6 million when compared to the prior year is
due primarily to higher salaries and benefits ($12.0 million) due to an increase in the number of employees (14%) and
salary increases, higher stock-based compensation ($5.6 million), higher legal and
professional fees ($921,000), an allowance for bad debt expense of $450,000 and higher office
expenses, including rent and information technology. Our personnel costs continue to increase as
we invest in our technical teams and other staffing to support our expansion into new regions particularly the Marcellus shall
play in Appalachia.
General and administrative expenses for 2007 increased $19.8 million from the same period of 2006
due primarily to higher salaries and benefits ($10.4 million), higher stock-based compensation
($4.0 million) and higher rent and office expense ($2.3 million). Stock-based compensation expense
represents the amortization of our grants of restricted stock and SARs to our employees and
directors as part of compensation. The following table summarizes general and administrative
expenses per mcfe for 2008, 2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
%
Change |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
%
Change |
|
General and administrative |
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
|
19 |
% |
Stock-based compensation (non-cash) |
|
|
0.17 |
|
|
|
0.16 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
0.16 |
|
|
|
0.15 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total general and administrative
expenses |
|
$ |
0.65 |
|
|
$ |
0.60 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
$ |
0.60 |
|
|
$ |
0.52 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense was $99.7 million for 2008 compared to $77.7 million in 2007 and $55.8
million in 2006. Interest expense for 2008 increased $22.0 million from the same period of 2007
due to the refinancing of certain debt from floating rates to higher fixed rates along with higher
overall debt balances. In September 2007, we issued $250.0 million of 7.5% senior subordinated
notes due 2017, which added $13.9 million of additional interest costs in 2008. In May 2008, we
issued $250.0 million of 7.25% senior subordinated notes due 2018, which added $11.8 million of
interest costs in 2008. The proceeds from both issuances were used to retire bank debt which carried a lower
interest rate. The note issuances were undertaken to better match the maturities of our debt with the life of our properties and to
give us greater liquidity for the near term. Average debt outstanding on the bank credit facility
for 2008 was $494.2 million compared to $417.6 million for 2007 and the weighted average interest
rate was 4.4% in 2008 compared to 6.4% in 2007. Interest expense for 2007 increased $21.9 million
from the same period of 2006 due to higher average debt balances and the refinancing of certain
debt from short-term floating to longer-term fixed rates. The issuance of the 7.5% senior
subordinated notes due 2017 in September 2007 added $4.8 million of interest costs in 2007. The
issuance of the 7.5% senior subordinated notes in May 2006 added $9.1 million of interest expense
in 2007. Average debt outstanding on the credit facility for 2007 was $417.6 million compared to
$347.8 million in 2006. The weighted average interest rate was 6.4% in 2007 compared to 6.4% in
the same period of 2006.
31
Depletion, depreciation and amortization (DD&A) was $299.8 million in 2008 compared to
$220.6 million in 2007 and $154.5 million in 2006. The increase in 2008 compared to the same
period of 2007 is due to a 21% increase in production and a 14% increase in depletion rates. On a
per mcfe basis, DD&A increased to $2.12 in 2008 compared to $1.89 in 2007 and $1.62 in 2006. DD&A
expense increased $66.1 million or 43% in 2007 compared to the same period of 2006 due to a 22%
increase in production and a 16% increase in depletion rates. The increase in DD&A per mcfe is
related to increasing drilling costs, higher acquisition costs and the mix of our production. The
following table summarizes DD&A expense per mcfe for 2008, 2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
%
Change |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
%
Change |
|
Depletion and amortization |
|
$ |
1.99 |
|
|
$ |
1.74 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
|
$ |
1.74 |
|
|
$ |
1.50 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
Depreciation |
|
|
0.09 |
|
|
|
0.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
0.09 |
|
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
Accretion and other |
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
0.06 |
|
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
0.06 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total DD&A expense |
|
$ |
2.12 |
|
|
$ |
1.89 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
$ |
1.89 |
|
|
$ |
1.62 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Operating Expenses
Our total operating expenses also include other expenses that generally do not trend with
production. These expenses include stock-based compensation, exploration expense, abandonment and
impairment of unproved properties and deferred compensation plan expenses. In 2008, stock-based
compensation is a component of direct operating expense ($2.8 million), exploration expense ($4.1
million) and general and administrative expense ($23.8 million) for a total of $31.2 million. In
2007, stock-based compensation was a component of direct operating expense ($1.8 million),
exploration expense ($3.5 million) and general and administrative expense ($18.2 million) for a
total of $24.0 million. In 2006, stock-based compensation was a component of direct operating
expense ($1.4 million), exploration expense ($3.1 million) and general and administrative expense
($14.3 million) for a total of $19.1 million. Stock-based compensation includes the amortization
of restricted stock grants and SARs grants. These costs are increasing due to increasing grant
date fair values and an increase in the number of grants on our increasing employee base.
Exploration expense was $67.7 million in 2008 compared to $43.3 million in 2007 and $44.1
million in 2006. The following table details our exploration-related expenses for 2008, 2007 and
2006 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
%
Change |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
Dry hole expense |
|
$ |
13,371 |
|
|
$ |
15,149 |
|
|
$ |
(1,778 |
) |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
$ |
15,149 |
|
|
$ |
15,084 |
|
|
$ |
65 |
|
|
|
|
% |
Seismic |
|
|
30,645 |
|
|
|
10,933 |
|
|
|
19,712 |
|
|
|
180 |
% |
|
|
10,933 |
|
|
|
15,277 |
|
|
|
(4,344 |
) |
|
|
28 |
% |
Personnel expense |
|
|
11,804 |
|
|
|
8,924 |
|
|
|
2,880 |
|
|
|
32 |
% |
|
|
8,924 |
|
|
|
6,917 |
|
|
|
2,007 |
|
|
|
29 |
% |
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
4,130 |
|
|
|
3,473 |
|
|
|
657 |
|
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
3,473 |
|
|
|
3,079 |
|
|
|
394 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
Delay rentals and other |
|
|
7,740 |
|
|
|
4,866 |
|
|
|
2,874 |
|
|
|
59 |
% |
|
|
4,866 |
|
|
|
3,731 |
|
|
|
1,135 |
|
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total exploration expense |
|
$ |
67,690 |
|
|
$ |
43,345 |
|
|
$ |
24,345 |
|
|
|
56 |
% |
|
$ |
43,345 |
|
|
$ |
44,088 |
|
|
$ |
(743 |
) |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abandonment and impairment of unproved properties was $47.9 million in 2008 compared to $6.8
million in 2007 and $257,000 in 2006. This increase is primarily due to the significant increase
in lease acquisition costs over the past three years and increased leasing activity in exploratory
areas that require several years to delineate. As we continue to review our acreage positions and
high grade our drilling inventory based on the current price environment, more leasehold
impairments and abandonments will be recorded.
Deferred compensation plan expense was a gain of $24.7 million in 2008 compared to a loss of
$28.3 million in 2007 and a loss of $6.9 million in 2006. This non-cash expense relates to the
increase or decrease in value of the vested Range common stock held in our deferred compensation plan.
The deferred compensation liability is adjusted to fair value by a charge or a credit to deferred compensation plan expense.
The year ended 2008 decreased $53.0 million from the same period of 2007 due to a decline in our
stock price, which decreased from $51.36 at December 31, 2007 to $34.39 at December 31, 2008.
During the same period of the prior year, our stock price increased from $27.46 at December 31,
2006 to $51.36 at December 31, 2007. From December 31, 2005 to December 31, 2006 our stock price
increased from $26.34 to $27.46.
Income tax expense was $196.4 million in 2008 compared to $98.8 million in 2007 and $121.8
million in 2006. The 2008 increase reflects a 104% increase in income from continuing operations
before taxes compared to the same period of 2007. 2008 provided for tax expenses at an effective
rate of 36.2% compared to an effective rate of 37.2% in the same period of 2007. For 2008, current
income taxes of $4.3 million include state income taxes of $3.3 million and $1.0 million of federal
income taxes. The effective tax rate on continuing operations was different than the statutory
rate of 35% due to state income
32
taxes and $2.0 million of additional tax benefit related to
discrete items. Income tax expense for 2007 decreased to $98.8 million, reflecting a 16% decrease
in income from continuing operations before taxes compared to the same period of 2006. The year
ended December 31, 2007 provided for tax expense at an effective rate of 37.2% compared to an
effective rate of 38.6% in the same period of 2006. For the year ended December 31, 2007, current
income taxes includes state income taxes of $449,000 and a benefit of $129,000 of federal income
taxes. We expect our effective tax rate to be approximately 37% for 2009.
Discontinued operations in 2007 include the operating results related to our Gulf of Mexico
properties and Austin Chalk properties sold in first quarter 2007.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition, Cash Flows and Liquidity
Our main sources of liquidity and capital resources are internally generated cash flow from
operations, a bank credit facility with both uncommitted and committed availability, asset sales
and access to the debt and equity capital markets. The debt and equity capital markets have
recently exhibited adverse conditions. Continued volatility in the capital markets may increase
costs associated with issuing debt due to increased spreads over relevant interest rate
benchmarks and affect our ability to access those markets. At this point, we do not believe our
liquidity has been materially affected by the recent events in the global financial markets and we
do not expect our liquidity to be materially impacted in the near future. We will continue to
monitor our liquidity and the credit markets. Additionally, we will continue to monitor events and
circumstances surrounding each of the twenty-six lenders in our bank credit facility. To date we
have experienced no disruptions in our ability to access the bank credit facility. However, we
cannot predict with any certainty the impact to us of any further disruption in the credit
environment. For additional information, see Risk Factors-Difficult Conditions in the global
capital markets and the economy generally may materially adversely affect our business and results
of operations in Item 1A of
this report. In December 2008, we elected to utilize the expansion option under our bank credit
facility and increased our credit facility commitment by $250.0 million, which makes the current
bank commitment $1.25 billion. At December 31, 2008, our borrowing base was $1.5 billion. The
borrowing base represents the amount approved by the bank group than can be borrowed based on our
assets while the bank commitment (or facility amount) is the amount the banks have committed to
fund pursuant to the credit agreement. We currently believe our maximum credit facility borrowing capacity
exceeds our current borrowing base and, based on current circumstances, is sufficient to absorb a
decline in commodity prices or any changes in bank lending practices.
During 2008, our net cash provided from continuing operations of $824.8 million, proceeds from
our April 2008 common stock offering of $282.2 million, proceeds from our May 2008 note offering of
$250.0 million, proceeds from the sale of assets of $68.2 million and bank borrowings were used to
fund $1.8 billion of capital expenditures (including acquisitions and equity investments). At
December 31, 2008, we had $753,000 in cash and total assets of $5.6 billion. Our debt to
capitalization ratio was 42% at December 31, 2008 compared to 40% at December 31, 2007. As of
December 31, 2008 and 2007, our total capitalization was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Bank debt |
|
$ |
693,000 |
|
|
$ |
303,500 |
|
Senior subordinated notes and other |
|
|
1,097,668 |
|
|
|
847,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt |
|
|
1,790,668 |
|
|
|
1,150,658 |
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
2,457,833 |
|
|
|
1,728,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization |
|
$ |
4,248,501 |
|
|
$ |
2,878,680 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt to capitalization ratio |
|
|
42 |
% |
|
|
40 |
% |
Long-term debt at December 31, 2008 totaled $1.8 billion, including $693.0 million of bank
credit facility debt and $1.1 billion of senior subordinated notes. Our available committed
borrowing capacity at December 31, 2008 was $557.0 million. Cash is required to fund capital
expenditures necessary to offset inherent declines in production and reserves that are typical in
the oil and gas industry. Future success in growing reserves and production will be highly
dependent on capital resources available and the success of finding or acquiring additional
reserves. We currently believe that net cash generated from operating activities and unused committed
borrowing capacity under the bank credit facility combined with our oil and gas price hedges
currently in place will be adequate to satisfy near-term financial obligations and liquidity needs.
However, long-term cash flows are subject to a number of variables including the level of
production and prices as well as various economic conditions that have historically affected the
oil and gas business. A material drop in oil and gas prices or a reduction in production and
reserves would reduce our ability to fund capital expenditures, reduce debt, meet financial
obligations and remain profitable. We operate in an environment with numerous financial and
operating risks, including, but not limited to, the inherent risks of the search for, development
and production of oil and gas, the ability to buy properties and sell production at
prices which provide an attractive return and the highly competitive nature of the industry. Our
ability to expand our reserve base is, in part, dependent on obtaining sufficient capital through
internal cash flow, bank borrowings, asset sales or the issuance of debt or
33
equity securities. There can be no assurance that internal cash flow and other capital sources will provide sufficient funds to
maintain capital expenditures that we believe are necessary to offset inherent declines in
production and proven reserves.
Our opinions concerning liquidity and our ability to avail ourselves in the future of the
financing options mentioned in the above forward-looking statements are based on currently
available information. If this information proves to be inaccurate, future availability of
financing may be adversely affected. Factors that affect the availability of financing include our
performance, the state of the worldwide debt and equity markets, investor perceptions and
expectations of past and future performance, the global financial climate and, in particular, with
respect to borrowings, the level of our working capital or outstanding debt and credit ratings by
rating agencies. For additional information, see Risk Factors-Difficult Conditions in the global
capital markets and the economy generally may materially adversely affect our business and results
of operations in Item 1A of
this report.
Credit Arrangements
We maintain a $1.25 billion revolving credit facility, which we refer to as our bank debt or
our bank credit facility. The bank credit facility is secured by substantially all of our assets
and matures on October 25, 2012. Availability under the bank credit facility is subject to a
borrowing base set by the lenders semi-annually with an option to set more often in certain
circumstances. The borrowing base is dependent on a number of factors, primarily the lenders
assessment of future cash flows. Redeterminations of the borrowing base require approval of 2/3rds
of the lenders; increases require unanimous approval. At February 19, 2009, the bank credit
facility had a $1.5 billion borrowing base and a $1.25 billion facility amount. Remaining credit
availability is $442.0 million on February 19, 2009. Our bank group is comprised of twenty-six
commercial banks, with no one bank holding more than 5.0% of the bank credit facility. We believe
our large number of banks and relatively low commitment hold levels allows for sufficient lending
capacity should we elect to increase our $1.25 billion commitment up to the $1.5 billion borrowing
base and also allows for flexibility should there be additional consolidation within the banking
sector. In December 2008, we elected to utilize the expansion option under the bank credit
facility and increased our credit facility commitment by $250.0 million, which made the current
commitment $1.25 billion.
Our bank debt and our subordinated notes impose limitations on the payment of dividends and
other restricted payments (as defined under the debt agreements for our bank debt and our
subordinated notes). The debt agreements also contain customary covenants relating to debt
incurrence, working capital, dividends and financial ratios. We were in compliance with all
covenants at December 31, 2008.
Cash Flow
Cash flows from operations are primarily affected by production volumes and commodity prices,
net of the effects of settlements of our derivatives. Our cash flows from operations also are
impacted by changes in working capital. We sell substantially all of our oil and gas production at
the wellhead under floating market contracts. However, we generally hedge a substantial, but
varying portion of our anticipated future oil and gas production for the next 12 to 24 months. Any
payments due to counterparties under our derivative contracts should ultimately be funded by prices
received from the sale of our production. Production receipts, however, often lag payments to the
counterparties. Any interim cash needs are funded by borrowing under the credit facility. As of
December 31, 2008, we have entered into hedging agreements covering 97.8 Bcfe for 2009.
Net cash provided from continuing operations in 2008 was $824.8 million, compared to $632.1
million in 2007 and $441.5 million in 2006. The increase in cash provided by operating activities
from 2007 to 2008 and from 2006 to 2007 was primarily due to increased production from acquisitions
and development activity and higher price realizations. Cash provided from operations is largely
dependent upon prices received for oil and gas production. As of February 19, 2009, we have hedged
approximately 77% of our 2009 projected production. Net cash provided from continuing operations
is also affected by working capital changes or the timing of cash receipts and disbursements.
Changes in working capital (as reflected in the consolidated statement of cash flows) for 2008 was
a positive $20.2 million compared to a negative $13.0 million in 2007 and a positive $20.3 million
in 2006.
Net cash used in investing activities in 2008 was $1.7 billion compared to $1.0 billion in
2007 and $911.7 million in 2006. In 2008, we spent $881.9 million on additions to oil and gas
properties, $834.8 million on acquisitions and $44.2 million on equity method investments and other
assets. Acquisitions in 2008 include the purchase of producing and non-producing Barnett Shale
properties and Marcellus Shale leasehold. In 2007, we spent $782.4 million in additions to oil and
gas properties, $336.5 million on acquisitions and $94.7 million on equity method investments.
Acquisitions in 2007 included acquiring additional interests in the Nora field of Virginia where we
entered into a joint development plan with Equitable Resources, Inc.
Also in 2007, we recognized proceeds of $234.3 million from the sale of assets. The 2006 period
included $487.2 million in additions to oil and gas properties and $360.1 million of acquisitions.
Acquisitions in 2006 include the purchase of Stroud Energy, Inc., which had operations in the
Barnett Shale.
34
Net cash provided from financing activities in 2008 was $903.7 million, compared to
$379.9 million in 2007 and $429.4 million in 2006. Historically, sources of financing have been
primarily bank borrowings and capital raised through equity and debt offerings. During 2008, we
received proceeds of $250.0 million from the issuance of our 7.25% senior subordinated notes and
proceeds of $282.2 million from a common stock offering. During 2007, we received proceeds of
$250.0 million from the issuance of our 7.5% senior subordinated notes due 2017 and proceeds of
$280.4 million from a common stock offering. During 2006, we received proceeds of $249.5 million
from the issuance of our 7.5% senior subordinated notes due 2016. In 2008, our board of directors
approved a share repurchase program authorizing the purchase of up to $10.0 million of our common
stock. During 2008, we expended $3.2 million to acquire 78,400 shares.
Capital Requirements
Our primary needs for cash are for exploration, development and acquisition of oil and gas
properties, repayment of principal and interest on outstanding debt and payment of dividends.
During 2008, $930.1 million of capital was expended on drilling projects. Also in 2008, $845.5
million was expended on acquisitions of additional interests in producing properties and unproved
acreage. The capital program, excluding acquisitions, was funded by net cash flow from operations,
proceeds from asset sales, debt and equity offerings and borrowings under our bank credit facility.
Our capital expenditure budget for 2009 is currently set at $700.0 million, excluding
acquisitions. Development and exploration activities are highly discretionary, and, for the
foreseeable future, we expect such activities to be maintained at levels equal to internal cash
flow. To the extent capital requirements exceed internal cash flow and proceeds from asset sales,
debt or equity may be issued to fund these requirements. We currently believe we have sufficient
liquidity and cash flow to meet our obligations for the next twelve months; however, a continued
drop in oil and gas prices or a reduction in production or reserves could adversely affect our
ability to fund capital expenditures and meet our financial obligations. We monitor our capital
expenditures on a regular basis, adjusting the amount up or down and also between our operating
regions, depending on commodity prices, cash flow and projected returns. Also, our obligations may
change due to acquisitions, divestitures and continued growth. We may issue additional shares of
stock, subordinated notes or other debt securities to fund capital expenditures, acquisitions,
extend maturities or to repay debt.
Cash Dividend Payments
The amount of future dividends is subject to declaration by the Board of Directors and
primarily depends on earnings and capital expenditures. In 2008, we paid $24.6 million in
dividends to our common shareholders ($0.04 per share in each quarter). In 2007, we paid $19.1
million in dividends to our common shareholders ($0.04 per share in the fourth quarter and $0.03
per share in the third, second and first quarters). In 2006, we paid $12.2 million in dividends to
our common stockholders ($0.03 per share in the fourth quarter and $0.02 per share in the third,
second and first quarters).
Cash Contractual Obligations
Our contractual obligations include long-term debt, operating leases, drilling commitments,
derivative obligations, other liabilities and transportation commitments. As of December 31, 2008,
we do not have any capital leases nor have we entered into any material long-term contracts for
equipment. As of December 31, 2008, we do not have any significant off-balance sheet debt or other
such unrecorded obligations and we have not guaranteed the debt of any unrelated party. The table
below provides estimates of the timing of future payments that we are obligated to make based on
agreements in place at December 31, 2008. In addition to the contractual obligations listed on the
table below, our balance sheet at December 31, 2008 reflects accrued interest payable on our bank
debt of $779,000 which is payable in first quarter 2009. We expect to make interest payments of
$9.6 million per year on our 6.375% senior subordinated notes, $14.8 million per year on our 7.375%
senior subordinated notes, $18.8 million per year on our 7.5% senior subordinated notes due 2016,
$18.8 million per year on our 7.5% senior subordinated notes due 2017 and $18.1 million per year on
our 7.25% senior subordinated notes.
35
The following summarizes our contractual financial obligations at December 31, 2008 and their
future maturities. We expect to fund these contractual obligations with cash generated from
operating activities, borrowings under our bank credit facility and proceeds from asset sales.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment due by period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 and |
|
|
2012 and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Bank debt due 2012 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
693,000 |
(a) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
693,000 |
|
7.375% senior subordinated notes due 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
6.375% senior subordinated notes due 2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
7.5% senior subordinated notes due 2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
7.5% senior subordinated notes due 2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
7.25% senior subordinated notes due 2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
Other debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105 |
|
Operating leases |
|
|
10,284 |
|
|
|
19,479 |
|
|
|
9,585 |
|
|
|
9,257 |
|
|
|
48,605 |
|
Drilling rig commitments |
|
|
26,850 |
|
|
|
116,800 |
|
|
|
31,685 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
175,335 |
|
Transportation commitments |
|
|
17,369 |
|
|
|
32,995 |
|
|
|
25,861 |
|
|
|
69,145 |
|
|
|
145,370 |
|
Seismic agreements |
|
|
900 |
|
|
|
900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,800 |
|
Derivative obligations (b) |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
Asset retirement obligation liability (c) |
|
|
2,055 |
|
|
|
10,197 |
|
|
|
1,233 |
|
|
|
69,972 |
|
|
|
83,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual obligations (d) |
|
$ |
57,468 |
|
|
$ |
180,371 |
|
|
$ |
961,469 |
|
|
$ |
1,048,374 |
|
|
$ |
2,247,682 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Due at termination date of our bank credit facility. We expect to renew our bank
credit facility, but there is no assurance that can be accomplished. Interest paid on our
bank credit facility would be approximately $20.1 million each year assuming no change in the
interest rate or outstanding balance. |
|
(b) |
|
Derivative obligations represent net open derivative contracts valued as of December
31, 2008. While such payments will be funded by higher prices received from the sale of our
production, production receipts may be received after our payments to counterparties, which
can result in borrowings under our bank credit facility. |
|
(c) |
|
The ultimate settlement and timing cannot be precisely determined in advance. |
|
(d) |
|
This table excludes the liability for the deferred compensation plans since these
obligations will be funded with existing plan assets. |
In addition to the amounts included in the above table, we have contracted with a pipeline
company through 2017 to deliver natural gas production volumes in Appalachia from
certain Marcellus Shale wells. The agreement calls for incremental increases over the initial
40,000 Mmbtu per day. These increases, which are contingent on certain pipeline modifications, are
for 30,000 Mmbtu per day in March 2009, 30,000 Mmbtu per day in October 2009, 30,000 Mmbtu per day
March 2010 and an additional 20,000 Mmbtu per day for July 2010 for a total increase of 110,000
Mmbtu per day.
Delivery Commitments
Under a sales agreement with Enterprise Products Operating, LLC, we have an obligation to
deliver 30,000 Mmbtu per day of volume at various delivery points within the Barnett Shale basin.
The contract, which began in 2008, extends for five years ending March 2013. As of December 31,
2008, remaining volumes to be delivered under this commitment are approximately 46.5 bcf.
Hedging Oil and Gas Prices
We use commodity-based derivative contracts to manage exposure to commodity price
fluctuations. We do not enter into these arrangements for speculative or trading purposes. These
contracts consist of collars and fixed price swaps. We do not utilize complex derivatives such as
swaptions, knockouts or extendable swaps. While there is a risk that the financial benefit of
rising oil and gas prices may not be captured, we believe the benefits of stable and predictable
cash flow are more important. Among these benefits are a more efficient utilization of existing
personnel and planning for future staff additions, the flexibility to enter into long-term projects
requiring substantial committed capital, smoother and more efficient execution of our ongoing
development drilling and production enhancement programs, more consistent returns on invested
capital, and better access to bank and other credit markets.
At December 31, 2008, swaps were in place covering 25.6 Bcf of gas at prices averaging $8.38
per mcf. We also had collars covering 54.8 Bcf of gas at weighted average floor and cap prices of
$8.28 to $9.27 and 2.9 million barrels of oil at weighted average floor and cap prices of $64.01 to
$76.00. Their fair value, represented by the estimated amount that would be
36
realized or payable on termination, based on a comparison of the contract price and a reference
price, generally NYMEX, approximated a pretax gain of $214.2 million at December 31, 2008. The
contracts expire monthly through December 2009.
At December 31, 2008, the following commodity derivative contracts were outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period |
|
Contract Type |
|
Volume Hedged |
|
Average Hedge Price |
Natural Gas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
Swaps |
|
70,000 Mmbtu/day |
|
$8.38 |
2009 |
|
Collars |
|
150,000 Mmbtu/day |
|
$8.28 - $9.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude Oil |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
Collars |
|
8,000 bbl/day |
|
$64.01 - $76.00 |
In addition to the swaps and collars above, we have entered into basis swap agreements. The
price we receive for our production can be less than NYMEX price because of adjustments for
delivery location (basis), relative quality and other factors; therefore, we have entered into
basis swap agreements that effectively fix the basis adjustments. The fair value of the basis
swaps was a net unrealized pre-tax gain of $12.4 million at December 31, 2008.
Interest Rates
At December 31, 2008, we had $1.8 billion of debt outstanding. Of this amount, $1.1 billion
bears interest at fixed rates averaging 7.3%. Bank debt totaling $693.0 million bears interest at
floating rates, which averaged 2.9% at year-end 2008. The 30-day LIBOR rate on December 31, 2008
was 0.4%. A 1% increase in short-term interest rates on the floating-rate debt outstanding at
December 31, 2008 would cost us approximately $6.9 million in additional annual interest expense.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not currently utilize any off-balance sheet arrangements with unconsolidated entities to
enhance our liquidity or capital resource position, or for any other purpose. However, as is
customary in the oil and gas industry, we have various contractual work commitments as described
above under cash contractual obligations.
Inflation and Changes in Prices
Our revenues, the value of our assets and our ability to obtain bank loans or additional
capital on attractive terms have been and will continue to be affected by changes in oil and gas
prices and the costs to produce our reserves. Oil and gas prices are subject to significant
fluctuations that are beyond our ability to control or predict. In a trend that began in the
fourth quarter of 2008 and has continued into 2009, the industry has experienced deteriorating
basis differentials in the Mid-Continent and West Texas areas primarily caused by an over-supply of
gas in these regions. Although certain of our costs and expenses are affected by general
inflation, inflation does not normally have a significant effect on our business. In a trend that
began in 2004 and accelerated through the middle of 2008, commodity prices for oil and gas
increased significantly. The higher prices have led to increased activity in the industry and,
consequently, rising costs. These cost trends have put pressure not only on our operating costs
but also on our capital costs. Due to the decline in commodity prices in the last half of 2008, we
expect these costs to moderate in 2009.
37
The following table indicates the average oil and gas prices received over the last five years
and quarterly for 2008, 2007 and 2006. Average price calculations exclude all derivative
settlements whether or not they qualify for hedge accounting. Oil is converted to natural gas
equivalent at the rate of one barrel equals six mcfe.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Sales Prices (Wellhead) |
|
Average NYMEX Prices (a) |
|
|
Crude |
|
Natural |
|
Equivalent |
|
Crude |
|
Natural |
|
|
Oil |
|
Gas |
|
Mcf |
|
Oil |
|
Gas |
|
|
(Per bbl) |
|
(Per mcf) |
|
(Per mcfe) |
|
(Per bbl) |
|
(Per mcf) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
$ |
96.77 |
|
|
$ |
8.07 |
|
|
$ |
9.14 |
|
|
$ |
100.47 |
|
|
$ |
8.91 |
|
2007 |
|
|
67.47 |
|
|
|
6.54 |
|
|
|
7.37 |
|
|
|
72.34 |
|
|
|
6.92 |
|
2006 |
|
|
62.36 |
|
|
|
6.59 |
|
|
|
7.25 |
|
|
|
66.22 |
|
|
|
7.26 |
|
2005 |
|
|
53.30 |
|
|
|
8.00 |
|
|
|
7.99 |
|
|
|
56.56 |
|
|
|
8.55 |
|
2004 |
|
|
39.20 |
|
|
|
5.80 |
|
|
|
5.79 |
|
|
|
41.41 |
|
|
|
6.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarterly |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First |
|
$ |
94.65 |
|
|
$ |
7.85 |
|
|
$ |
8.96 |
|
|
$ |
97.90 |
|
|
$ |
8.07 |
|
Second |
|
|
120.27 |
|
|
|
10.09 |
|
|
|
11.48 |
|
|
|
123.98 |
|
|
|
10.80 |
|
Third |
|
|
113.91 |
|
|
|
9.72 |
|
|
|
10.90 |
|
|
|
117.83 |
|
|
|
10.08 |
|
Fourth |
|
|
55.09 |
|
|
|
4.86 |
|
|
|
5.43 |
|
|
|
58.79 |
|
|
|
6.82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First |
|
$ |
56.01 |
|
|
$ |
6.41 |
|
|
$ |
6.88 |
|
|
$ |
58.27 |
|
|
$ |
6.96 |
|
Second |
|
|
62.20 |
|
|
|
6.95 |
|
|
|
7.57 |
|
|
|
65.03 |
|
|
|
7.56 |
|
Third |
|
|
70.51 |
|
|
|
5.97 |
|
|
|
7.01 |
|
|
|
75.38 |
|
|
|
6.13 |
|
Fourth |
|
|
82.12 |
|
|
|
6.80 |
|
|
|
7.94 |
|
|
|
90.68 |
|
|
|
7.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First |
|
$ |
59.74 |
|
|
$ |
8.33 |
|
|
$ |
8.41 |
|
|
$ |
63.48 |
|
|
$ |
9.07 |
|
Second |
|
|
65.36 |
|
|
|
6.28 |
|
|
|
7.17 |
|
|
|
70.70 |
|
|
|
6.82 |
|
Third |
|
|
64.53 |
|
|
|
6.12 |
|
|
|
7.00 |
|
|
|
70.48 |
|
|
|
6.53 |
|
Fourth |
|
|
59.80 |
|
|
|
5.91 |
|
|
|
6.58 |
|
|
|
60.21 |
|
|
|
6.62 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Based on average of bid week prompt month prices. |
Debt Ratings
We receive debt credit ratings from Standard & Poors Ratings Group, Inc. (S&P) and Moodys
Investor Services, Inc. (Moodys), which are subject to regular reviews. S&Ps rating for us is
BB with a stable outlook. Moodys rating for us is Ba2 with a stable outlook. We believe that S&P
and Moodys consider many factors in determining our ratings including: production growth
opportunities, liquidity, debt levels, asset, and proved reserve mix. We also believe that the
rating agencies take into consideration our size, corporate structure, the complexity of our
capital structure and organization, and history of how we have chosen to finance our growth. We
believe that our simple balance sheet, singular line of business, and practice of funding our
growth with a balanced mix of long-term debt and common equity positively impact our ratings. In
addition to qualitative and quantitative factors unique to Range, we believe that the rating
agencies consider various macro-economic factors such as the projected future price of oil and gas,
trends in industry service costs, and global supply and demand for energy. Based upon the factors
influencing our credit ratings which are within our control, we are not currently aware of any reason why our
credit rating would change materially from the present ratings. A reduction in our debt ratings
could negatively impact our ability to obtain additional financing or the interest rate, fees and
other terms associated with such additional financing.
38
Managements Discussion of Critical Accounting Estimates
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based
upon consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of our financial statements
requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at year-end and the reported
amounts of revenues and expenses during the year. Actual results could differ from the estimates
and assumptions used.
Certain accounting estimates are considered to be critical if (a) the nature of the estimates
and assumptions is material due to the level of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for
highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to changes; and (b) the impact of
the estimates and assumptions on financial condition or operating performance is material.
Oil and Gas Properties
We use the successful efforts method to account for exploration and development expenditures.
Unsuccessful exploration drilling costs are expensed and can have a significant effect on reported
operating results. Successful exploration drilling costs and all development costs are capitalized
and systematically charged to expense using the units of production method based on proved
developed oil and gas reserves as estimated by our engineers and reviewed by independent engineers.
Costs incurred for exploratory wells that find reserves that cannot yet be classified as proved
are capitalized on our balance sheet if (a) the well has found a sufficient quantity of reserves to
justify its completion as a producing well and (b) we are making sufficient progress assessing the
reserves and the economic and operating viability of the project. Proven property leasehold costs
are amortized to expense using the units of production method based on total proved reserves.
Properties are assessed for impairment as circumstances warrant (at least annually) and impairments
to value are charged to expense. The successful efforts method inherently relies upon the
estimation of proved reserves, which includes proved developed and proved undeveloped volumes.
Proved reserves are defined by the SEC as those volumes of crude oil, condensate, natural gas
liquids and natural gas that geological and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty
are recoverable from known reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions. Proved
developed reserves are volumes expected to be recovered through existing wells with existing
equipment and operating methods. Although our engineers are knowledgeable of and follow the
guidelines for reserves established by the SEC, the estimation of reserves requires engineers to
make a significant number of assumptions based on professional judgment. Reserve estimates are
updated at least annually and consider recent production levels and other technical information.
Estimated reserves are often subject to future revisions, which could be substantial, based on the
availability of additional information, including: reservoir performance, new geological and
geophysical data, additional drilling, technological advancements, price and cost changes and other
economic factors. Changes in oil and gas prices can lead to a decision to start-up or shut-in
production, which can lead to revisions to reserve quantities. Reserve revisions in turn cause
adjustments in the depletion rates used by us. We cannot predict what reserve revisions may be
required in future periods. Reserve estimates are reviewed and approved by our Senior Vice
President of Reservoir Engineering who reports directly to our President. To further ensure the
reliability of our reserve estimates, we engage independent petroleum consultants to review our
estimates of proved reserves. Independent petroleum consultants reviewed 87% of our reserves in 2008 compared to 86% in 2007 and 2006.
Historical variances between our reserve estimates and the aggregate
estimates of our consultants have been less than 5%. The reserves included in this report are
those reserves estimated by our employees.
Depletion rates are determined based on reserve quantity estimates and the capitalized costs
of producing properties. As the estimated reserves are adjusted, the depletion expense for a
property will change, assuming no change in production volumes or the capitalized costs. While
total depletion expense for the life of a property is limited to the propertys total cost, proved
reserve revisions result in a change in timing when depletion expense is recognized. Downward
revisions of proved reserves result in an acceleration of depletion expense, while upward revisions
tend to lower the rate of depletion expense
39
recognition. Based on proved reserves at December 31, 2008, we estimate that a 1% change in proved
reserves would increase or decrease 2009 depletion expense by approximately $3.0 million (assuming
a 10% production increase). Estimated reserves are used as the basis for calculating the expected
future cash flows from a property, which are used to determine whether that property may be
impaired. Reserves are also used to estimate the supplemental disclosure of the standardized
measure of discounted future net cash flows relating to oil and gas producing activities and
reserve quantities in Note 18 to our consolidated financial statements. Changes in the estimated
reserves are considered in estimates for accounting purposes and are reflected on a prospective
basis.
We monitor our long-lived assets recorded in property, plant and equipment in our consolidated
balance sheet to ensure they are fairly presented. We must evaluate our properties for potential
impairment when circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset could exceed its fair
value. A significant amount of judgment is involved in performing these evaluations since the
results are based on estimated future events. Such events include a projection of future oil and
gas sales prices, an estimate of the ultimate amount of recoverable oil and gas reserves that will
be produced from a field, the timing of future production, future production costs, future
abandonment costs, and future inflation. The need to test a property for impairment can be based
on several factors, including a significant reduction in sales prices for oil and/or gas,
unfavorable adjustments to reserves, physical damage to production equipment and facilities, a
change in costs, or other changes to contracts or environmental regulations. All of these factors
must be considered when testing a propertys carrying value for impairment. The review is done by
determining if the historical cost of proved properties less the applicable accumulated
depreciation, depletion and amortization is less than the estimated undiscounted future net cash
flows. The expected future net cash flows are estimated based on our plans to produce and develop
proved reserves. Expected future net cash inflow from the sale of production of reserves is
calculated based on estimated future prices and estimated operating and development costs. We
estimate prices based upon market related information including published futures prices. The
estimated future level of production is based on assumptions surrounding future levels of prices
and costs, field decline rates, market demand and supply, the economic and regulatory climates.
When the carrying value exceeds the sum of future net cash flows, an impairment loss is recognized
for the difference between the estimated fair market value (as determined by discounted future net
cash flows) and the carrying value of the asset. We cannot predict whether impairment charges may
be required in the future. Our historical impairment of producing properties has been $74.9
million in 2006, $3.6 million in 2004, $31.1 million in 2001, $29.9 million in 1999 and $214.7
million in 1998. We believe that a sensitivity analysis regarding the effect of changes in
assumptions on estimated impairment is impractical to provide because of the number of assumptions
and variables involved which have interdependent effects on the potential outcome.
We are required to develop estimates of fair value to allocate purchase prices paid to acquire
businesses to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed under the purchase method of accounting.
The purchase price paid to acquire a business is allocated to its assets and liabilities based on
the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the date of
acquisition. We use all available information to make these fair value determinations. See Note 3
to our consolidated financial statements for information on these acquisitions.
We adhere to the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 19, Financial Accounting and
Reporting by Oil and Gas Producing Companies, for recognizing any impairment of capitalized costs
to unproved properties. The greatest portion of these costs generally relate to the acquisition of
leaseholds. The costs are capitalized and periodically evaluated (at least quarterly) as to
recoverability, based on changes brought about by economic factors and potential shifts in business
strategy employed by management. We consider a combination of time, geologic and engineering
factors to evaluate the need for impairment of these costs. Unproved properties had a net book
value of $766.2 million in 2008 compared to $271.4 million in 2007 and $226.3 million in 2006. We
have recorded abandonment and impairment expense related to unproved properties of $47.9 million in
2008 compared to $6.8 million in 2007 and $257,000 in 2006.
Oil and Gas Derivatives
We enter into derivative contracts to mitigate our exposure to commodity price risk associated
with future oil and gas production. These contracts have historically consisted of options, in the
form of collars, and fixed price swaps. Every derivative instrument is required to be recorded on
the balance sheet as either an asset or a liability measured at its fair value. We record these
values on our balance sheet as either Unrealized derivative gains or Unrealized derivative
losses.
If a derivative qualifies for cash flow hedge accounting, changes in the fair value of
effective portion are recorded as a component of Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) on
the balance sheet, which is later transferred to earnings when the hedged transaction occurs.
Realized gains or losses of derivatives that qualify for hedge accounting are included in oil and
gas sales in our statement of operations. Oil and gas sales include $63.6 million of losses in
2008 compared to gains of $4.2 million in 2007 and losses of $93.2 million in 2006.
40
Some of our derivatives do not qualify for hedge accounting or are not designated as hedges
but are, to a degree, an economic offset of our commodity price exposure. These contracts are
accounted for using the mark-to-market accounting method. Under this method, all unrealized and
realized gains and losses related to these contracts are recognized in our consolidated statement
of operations under the caption Derivative fair value income (loss). As of December 31, 2008,
derivatives for 40.1 Bcfe no longer qualify or are not designated for hedge accounting.
We have also entered into basis swap agreements which do not qualify for hedge accounting and
are also marked to market. The price we receive for our gas production can be less than the NYMEX
price because of adjustments for delivery location, or basis, relative quality and other factors;
therefore, we have entered into basis swap agreement that effectively fix our basis adjustments for
a portion of our production.
On January 1, 2008, we adopted SFAS No. 157 for those financial assets and liabilities
recognized or disclosed at fair value in our consolidated financial statements on a recurring
basis. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and
expands disclosures about fair value measurements. It does not require us to make any new fair
value measurements, but rather establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to
the valuation techniques used to measure fair value. Derivative assets and liabilities recorded at
fair value are categorized based upon the level of judgment associated with the inputs used to
measure their value. Hierarchical levels-defined by SFAS No. 157 and directly related to the
amount of subjectivity associated with the inputs to fair valuation of these assets and
liabilities are as follows:
Level 1 Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical
assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.
Level 2 Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets
included in Level 1, which are directly or indirectly observable as of
the reporting date. Level 2 includes those financial instruments that
are valued using models or other valuation methodologies. These models
are primarily industry standard models that consider assumptions,
including quoted forward prices for commodities, time value, volatility
factors and current market and contractual prices for underlying
instruments, as well as other relevant economics measures. Our
derivatives, which consist primarily of commodity swaps and collars, are
valued using commodity market data, which is derived by combining raw
inputs and quantitative models and processes to generate forward curves.
Where observable inputs are available, directly or indirectly, for
substantially the full term of the asset or liability, the instrument is
categorized in Level 2.
Level 3 Pricing inputs include significant inputs that are generally
less observable from objective sources. These inputs may be used with
internally developed methodologies that result in managements best
estimate of fair value. At December 31, 2008, we have no Level 3
measurements.
For Range, the primary impact from the adoption of SFAS No. 157 at January 1, 2008 related to
the fair value measurement of our marketable securities held in our deferred compensation plan and
the fair value measurement of our derivative instruments. FSP FAS 157-2, Effective Date of FASB
Statement No. 157, deferred the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for one year for certain
non-financial asset and non-financial liabilities, which for us includes the initial measurement of
asset retirement obligations. We will adopt SFAS 157 for non-financial assets and liabilities
effective January 1, 2009 and it is not expected to have a significant impact on our reported
financial position or earnings.
We use a market approach for our value measurements. The assets and liabilities are
classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair
value measurement. Our trading securities in Level 1 are exchange traded and measured at fair
value with a market approach using December 31, 2008 market values. Our commodity derivatives in
Level 2 are measured using third-party pricing services which have been corroborated with data from
active markets or broker quotes. Our exposure is diversified among major investment grade
financial institutions and we have master netting agreements with the majority of our
counterparties that provide for offsetting payables against receivables from separate derivative
contracts. Our derivative counterparties include twelve financial institutions, ten of which are
secured lenders in our bank credit facility. We have two counterparties that are not part of our
bank group and three counterparties in our bank group with no master netting agreements. Mitsui &
Co. and J. Aron & Company are the two counterparties not in our bank group. At December 31, 2008,
our net derivative receivable includes a receivable from J. Aron & Company of $987,000 and a
receivable from Mitsui & Co. of $18.0 million. In accordance with SFAS No. 157, counterparty
credit risk is considered when determining the fair value of our derivative contracts. While our
counterparties are major investment grade financial institutions, the fair value of our derivative
contracts have been adjusted to account for the risk of non-performance by the counterparty, which
was immaterial.
41
Asset Retirement Obligations
We have significant obligations to remove tangible equipment and restore land at the end of
oil and gas production operations. Removal and restoration obligations are primarily associated
with plugging and abandoning wells. Estimating the future asset removal costs is difficult and
requires us to make estimates and judgments because most of the removal obligations are many years
in the future and contracts and regulations often have vague descriptions of what constitutes
removal. Asset removal technologies and costs are constantly changing, as are regulatory,
political, environmental, safety and public relations considerations.
Inherent in the fair value calculation are numerous assumptions and judgments including the
ultimate retirement costs, inflation factors, credit-adjusted discount rates, timing of retirement,
and changes in the legal, regulatory, environmental and political environments. To the extent
future revisions to these assumptions impact the present value of the existing asset retirement
obligation, (ARO), a corresponding adjustment is made to the oil and gas property balance. For
example, as we analyze actual plugging and abandonment information, we may revise our estimate of
current costs, the assumed annual inflation of the costs and/or the assumed productive lives of our
wells. During 2008, we increased our existing estimated asset retirement obligation by $2.4
million or approximately 3% of the asset retirement obligation at December 31, 2007. In addition,
increases in the discounted ARO liability resulting from the passage of time are reflected as
accretion expense, a component of depletion, depreciation and amortization in our consolidated
statement of operations. Because of the subjectivity of assumptions and the relatively long lives
of most of our wells, the costs to ultimately retire our wells may vary significantly from prior
estimates. We do not provide for a market risk premium because a reliable estimate cannot be
determined.
Deferred Taxes
We are subject to income and other taxes in all areas in which we operate. When recording
income tax expense, certain estimates are required because income tax returns are generally filed
many months after the close of a calendar year, tax returns are subject to audit, which can take
years to complete, and future events often impact the timing of when income tax expenses and
benefits are recognized. We have deferred tax assets relating to tax operating loss carryforwards
and other deductible differences. We routinely evaluate deferred tax assets to determine the
likelihood of realization. A valuation allowance is recognized on deferred tax assets when we
believe that certain of these assets are not likely to be realized.
In determining deferred tax liabilities, accounting rules require accumulated other
comprehensive income to be considered, even though such income or loss has not yet been earned. At
year-end 2008, deferred tax liabilities exceeded deferred tax assets by $816.4 million, with $44.7
million of deferred tax liabilities related to unrealized hedging gains included in accumulated
other comprehensive income. At year-end 2007, deferred tax liabilities exceeded deferred tax
assets by $563.9 million, with $16.3 million of deferred tax assets related to unrealized hedging
losses included in OCI.
We may be challenged by taxing authorities over the amount and/or timing of recognition of
revenues and deductions in our various income tax returns. Although we believe that we have
adequately provided for all taxes, gains or losses could occur in the future due to changes in
estimates or resolution of outstanding tax matters.
Contingent Liabilities
A provision for legal, environmental and other contingent matters is charged to expense when
the loss is probable and the cost or range of cost can be reasonably estimated. Judgment is often
required to determine when expenses should be recorded for legal, environmental and contingent
matters. In addition, we often must estimate the amount of such losses. In many cases, our
judgment is based on the input of our legal advisors and on the interpretation of laws and
regulations, which can be interpreted differently by regulators and/or the courts. We monitor
known and potential legal, environmental and other contingent matters and make our best estimate of
when to record losses for these matters based on available information. Although we continue to
monitor all contingencies closely, particularly our outstanding litigation, we currently have no
material accruals for contingent liabilities.
Revenue Recognition
Oil, gas and natural gas liquids are recognized when the products are sold and delivery to the
purchaser has occurred. We use the sales method to account for gas imbalances, recognizing revenue
based on gas delivered rather than our working interest share of gas produced. We recognize the
cost of revenues, such as transportation and compression expense, as a reduction of revenue.
42
Stock-based Compensation
We adopted SFAS No. 123(R) on January 1, 2006. We previously accounted for stock awards under
the recognition and measurement principles of ABB No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,
and related interpretations. Prior to January 1, 2006 stock-based employee compensation for
restricted stock was reflected in our statement of operations, but no compensation expense was
recognized for stock options granted with an exercise price equal to the market value of the
underlying common stock on the date of grant.
We adopted SFAS No. 123(R) using the modified prospective transition method. Under the
modified prospective application method, we have applied the standards to awards made after
adoption. Additionally, compensation cost for the unvested portion of stock awards outstanding as
of January 1, 2006 has been recognized as compensation expense as the requisite service is rendered
after January 1, 2006. We recognize stock-based compensation on a straight-line basis over the
requisite service period for the entire award. The expense we recognize is net of estimated
forfeitures. We estimate our forfeiture rate based on prior experience and adjust it as
circumstances warrant.
The Compensation Committee grants restricted stock to certain employees and to non-employee
directors of the Board of Directors as part of their compensation. Compensation expense is
recognized over the balance of the vesting period, which is typically three years for employee
grants and immediate vesting for non-employee directors. All restricted shares that are granted
are placed in the deferred compensation plan. All vested restricted stock held in our deferred
compensation plan is marked-to-market each reporting period based on the market value of our stock.
This mark-to-market is presented in the caption deferred compensation plan in our statement of
operations. See additional information in Note 12.
The fair value of stock options and stock-settled SARs is estimated on the date of grant using
the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model. The model employs various assumptions, based on
managements best estimates at the time of the grant, which impact the fair value calculated and
ultimately, the expense that is recognized over the life of the award. The fair value of
restricted stock awards is determined based on the fair market value of our common stock on the
date of grant.
Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted
In June 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position No. EITF 03-6-1 Determining Whether Instruments
Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions are Participating Securities, (FSP EITF 03-6-1)
which provides that unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to
dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and,
therefore, need to be included in the earnings allocation in computing earnings per share under the
two class method. FSP EITF 03-6-1 is effective for us January 1, 2009 and all prior-period EPS
data (including any amounts related to interim periods, summaries of earnings and selected
financial data) will be adjusted retroactively to conform to its provisions. Early application of
FSP EITF 03-6-1 is not permitted. Although restricted stock awards meet this definition, we do not
expect the application of FSP 03-6-1 to have a significant impact on our reported earnings per
share.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosure about Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (SFAS No. 161). SFAS No. 161 amends
and expands the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 133 with the intent to provide users of
financial statements with an enhanced understanding of: (i) how and why an entity uses derivative
instruments; (ii) how derivative instruments and related hedge items are accounted for under SFAS
No. 133 and its related interpretations; and (iii) how derivative instruments and related hedged
items affect an entitys financial position, financial performance and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 is
effective for us January 1, 2009 and will only impact future disclosure about our derivative
instruments and hedging activities.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), Business Combinations. SFAS No. 141(R)
replaces SFAS No. 141. The statement retains the purchase method of accounting for acquisitions,
but requires a number of changes, including changes in the way assets and liabilities are
recognized in the purchase accounting. It changes the recognition of assets acquired and
liabilities assumed arising from contingencies, requires the capitalization of in-process research
and development at fair value, and requires the expensing of acquisition-related costs as incurred.
The statement will apply prospectively to business combinations occurring in our fiscal year
beginning January 1, 2009. The effect of adopting SFAS No. 141(R) is not expected to have an
effect on our reported financial position or earnings.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The primary objective of the following information is to provide forward-looking quantitative
and qualitative information about our potential exposure to market risks. The term market risk
refers to the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in oil and gas prices and interest rates.
The disclosures are not meant to be precise indicators of expected future losses,
43
but rather indicators of reasonably possible losses. This forward-looking information
provides indicators of how we view and manage our ongoing market-risk exposure. All of our
market-risk sensitive instruments were entered into for purposes other than trading. All accounts
are US dollar denominated.
Financial Market Risk
The debt and equity markets have recently exhibited adverse conditions. The unprecedented
volatility and upheaval in the capital markets may increase costs associated with issuing debt
instruments due to increased spreads over relevant interest rate benchmarks and may affect our
ability to access those markets. At this point, we do not believe our liquidity has been
materially affected by the recent events in the global markets and we do not expect our liquidity
to be materially impacted in the near future. We will continue to monitor our liquidity and the
capital markets. Additionally, we will continue to monitor events and circumstances surrounding
each of our twenty-six lenders in the bank credit facility. See also Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Market Risk
Our major market risk is exposure to oil and gas prices. Realized prices are primarily driven
by worldwide prices for oil and spot market prices for North American gas production. Oil and gas
prices have been volatile and unpredictable for many years.
Commodity Price Risk
We periodically enter into derivative arrangements with respect to our oil and gas production.
These arrangements are intended to reduce the impact of oil and gas price fluctuations. Certain
of our derivatives are swaps where we receive a fixed price for our production and pay market
prices to the counterparty. Our derivatives program also includes collars, which establish a
minimum floor price and a predetermined ceiling price. As of December 31, 2008, we had oil and gas
swaps in place covering 25.6 Bcf of gas. We also had collars covering 54.8 Bcf of gas and 2.9
million barrels of oil. These contracts expire monthly through December 2009. The fair value,
represented by the estimated amount that would be realized upon immediate liquidation as of
December 31, 2008, approximated a net unrealized pre-tax gain of $214.2 million.
At December 31, 2008, the following commodity derivative contracts were outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Fair |
Period |
|
Contract Type |
|
Volume Hedged |
|
Hedge Price |
|
Market Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
Natural Gas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
Swaps |
|
70,000 Mmbtu/day |
|
$8.38 |
|
$ |
57,280 |
|
2009 |
|
Collars |
|
150,000 Mmbtu/day |
|
$8.28 - $9.27 |
|
$ |
121,781 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude Oil |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
Collars |
|
8,000 bbl/day |
|
$64.01 - $76.00 |
|
$ |
35,166 |
|
Other Commodity Risk
We are impacted by basis risk, caused by factors that affect the relationship between
commodity futures prices reflected in derivative commodity instruments and the cash market price of
the underlying commodity. Natural gas transaction prices are frequently based on industry
reference prices that may vary from prices experienced in local markets. If commodity price
changes in one region are not reflected in other regions, derivative commodity instruments may no
longer provide the expected hedge, resulting in increased basis risk. In addition to the collars
and swaps above, we have entered into basis swap agreements. The price we receive for our gas
production can be more or less than the NYMEX price because of adjustments for delivery location
(basis), relative quality and other factors; therefore, we have entered into basis swap
agreements that effectively fix the basis adjustments. The fair value of the basis swaps was a net
realized pre-tax gain of $12.4 million at December 31, 2008.
44
The following table shows the fair value of our swaps and collars and the hypothetical change
in fair value that would result from a 10% change in commodities prices at December 31, 2008. The
hypothetical change in fair value would be a gain or loss depending on whether prices increase or
decrease (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hypothetical |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Fair Value |
Swaps |
|
$ |
57,280 |
|
|
$ |
15,000 |
|
Collars |
|
$ |
156,947 |
|
|
$ |
45,000 |
|
Our
commodity-based contracts expose us to the credit-risk of
non-performance by the counterparty to the contracts. Our exposure is diversified among major investment grade financial institutions and we have
master netting agreements with the majority of our counterparties that provide for offsetting
payables against receivables from separate derivative contracts. Our derivative counterparties
include twelve financial institutions, ten of which are secured lenders in our bank credit
facility. We have two counterparties that are not part of our bank group and three counterparties
in our bank group with no master netting agreement. Mitsui & Co. and J. Aron & Company are the two
counterparties not in our bank group. At December 31, 2008, our net derivative receivable includes
a receivable from J. Aron & Company of $987,000 and a receivable from Mitsui & Co. of $18.0
million. In accordance with SFAS No. 157, counterparty credit risk is considered when determining
the fair value of our derivative contracts. While counterparties are major investment grade
financial institutions, the fair value of our derivative contracts have been adjusted to account
for the risk of non-performance by counterparty, which was immaterial.
Interest Rate Risk
We are exposed to interest rate risk on our bank debt. We attempt to balance variable rate
debt, fixed rate debt and debt maturities to manage interest costs, interest rate volatility and
financing risk. This is accomplished through a mix of fixed rate senior subordinated debt and
variable rate bank debt.
At December 31, 2008, we had $1.8 billion of debt outstanding. Of this amount, $1.1 billion
bears interest at a fixed rate averaging 7.3%. Bank debt totaling $693.0 million bears interest at
floating rates, which was 2.9% on that date. On December 31, 2008, the 30-day LIBOR rate was 0.4%.
A 1% increase in short-term interest rates on the floating-rate debt outstanding at December 31,
2008 would cost us approximately $6.9 million in additional annual interest expense.
The fair value of our subordinated debt is based on year-end quoted market prices. The
following table presents information on these fair values (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Value |
|
Fixed rate debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Subordinated Notes due 2013 |
|
$ |
197,968 |
|
|
$ |
181,500 |
|
(The interest rate is fixed at a rate of 7.375%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Subordinated Notes due 2015 |
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
121,500 |
|
(The interest rate is fixed at a rate of 6.375%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Subordinated Notes due 2016 |
|
|
249,595 |
|
|
|
212,500 |
|
(The interest rate is fixed at a rate of 7.5%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Subordinated Notes due 2017 |
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
209,375 |
|
(The interest rate is fixed at a rate of 7.5%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Subordinated Notes due 2018 |
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
206,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(The interest rate is fixed at a rate of 7.25%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,097,563 |
|
|
$ |
931,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
For financial statements required by Item 8, see Item 15 in Part IV of this report.
|
|
|
ITEM 9. |
|
CHANGE IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL
DISCLOSURE |
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures. As required by Rule 13a-15(b) under the Exchange Act, we
have evaluated, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our
principal executive officer and principal financial officer, the effectiveness of the design and
operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)
under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Our disclosure
controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance that the information required
to be disclosed by us in reports that we file under the Exchange Act is accumulated and
communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial
officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure and is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the
SEC. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer
concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of December 31, 2008.
Managements Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and Attestation Report
of Registered Public Accounting Firm. Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
we have included a report of managements assessment of the design and effectiveness of its
internal controls as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2008. Ernst & Young LLP, our registered public accountants, also attested to, and reported on,
managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting.
Managements report and the independent public accounting firms attestation report are included in
our 2008 Financial Statements in Item 15 under the captions Managements Report on Internal
Control over Financial Reporting and Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on
Internal Control over Financial Reporting, and are incorporated herein by reference.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. As of the end of the period covered by
this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of our internal control over financial
reporting to determine whether any changes occurred during fourth quarter 2008 that have materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting. Based on that evaluation, there were no changes in our internal control over financial
reporting or in other factors that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially
affect our internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
46
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The officers and directors are listed below with a description of their experience and certain
other information. Each director was elected for a one-year term at the 2008 annual stockholders
meeting. Officers are appointed by our board of directors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Office |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held |
|
|
|
|
Age |
|
Since |
|
Position |
Charles L.
Blackburn
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
Director |
Anthony V. Dub
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
1995 |
|
|
Director |
V. Richard Eales
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
2001 |
|
|
Lead Independent Director |
James M. Funk
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Director |
Allen Finkelson
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
1994 |
|
|
Director |
Jonathan S. Linker
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
Director |
Kevin S. McCarthy
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Director |
John H. Pinkerton
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
1990 |
|
|
Director, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |
Jeffrey L. Ventura
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
Director, President and Chief Operating Officer |
Roger S. Manny
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
Alan W. Farquharson
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Senior Vice President Reservoir Engineering |
Steven L. Grose
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Senior Vice President Appalachia |
David P. Poole
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Senior Vice President General Counsel and Corporate Secretary |
Chad L. Stephens
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
1990 |
|
|
Senior Vice President Corporate Development |
Rodney L. Waller
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
1999 |
|
|
Senior Vice President, Chief Compliance Officer and Assistant Corporate
Secretary |
Mark D. Whitley
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Senior Vice President Southwest Business Unit and Engineering Technology |
Charles L. Blackburn was elected as a director in 2003. Mr. Blackburn has more than 40 years
experience in oil and gas exploration and production serving in several executive and board
positions. Previously, he served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Maxus Energy
Corporation from 1987 until that companys sale to YPF Socieded Anonima in 1995. Maxus was the oil
and gas producer which remained after Diamond Shamrock Corporations spin-off of its refining and
marketing operations. Mr. Blackburn joined Diamond Shamrock in 1986 as President of their
exploration and production subsidiary. From 1952 through 1986, Mr. Blackburn was with Shell Oil
Company, serving as Director and Executive Vice President for exploration and production for the
final ten years of that period. Mr. Blackburn has previously served on the Boards of Anderson
Clayton and Co. (1978-1986), King Ranch Corp. (1987-1988), Penrod Drilling Co. (1988-1991),
Landmark Graphics Corp. (1992-1996) and Lone Star Technologies, Inc. (1991-2001). Currently, Mr.
Blackburn also serves as an advisory director to the oil and gas loan committee of Guaranty Bank.
Mr. Blackburn received his Bachelor of Science degree in Engineering Physics from the University of
Oklahoma.
Anthony V. Dub became a director in 1995. Mr. Dub is Chairman of Indigo Capital, LLC, a
financial advisory firm based in New York. Before forming Indigo Capital in 1997, he served as an
officer of Credit Suisse First Boston (CSFB). Mr. Dub joined CSFB in 1971 and was named a
Managing Director in 1981. Mr. Dub led a number of departments during his 26 year career at CSFB
including the Investment Banking Department. After leaving CSFB, Mr. Dub became Vice Chairman and
a director of Capital IQ, Inc. until its sale to Standard & Poors in 2004. Capital IQ is a leader
in helping organizations capitalize on synergistic integration of market intelligence,
institutional knowledge and relationships. Mr. Dub received a Bachelor of Arts, magna cum laude,
from Princeton University.
V. Richard Eales became a director in 2001 and was selected as Lead Independent Director in
2008. Mr. Eales has over 35 years of experience in the energy, high technology and financial
industries. He is currently retired, having been a financial consultant serving energy and
information technology businesses from 1999 through 2002. Mr. Eales was employed by Union Pacific
Resources Group Inc. from 1991 to 1999 serving as Executive Vice President from 1995 through 1999.
Before 1991, Mr. Eales served in various financial capacities with Butcher & Singer and Janney
Montgomery Scott, investment banking firms, as CFO of Novell, Inc., a technology company, and in
the treasury department of Mobil Oil
Corporation. Mr. Eales received his Bachelor of Chemical Engineering from Cornell University
and his Masters degree in Business Administration from Stanford University.
47
James M. Funk became a director
in December 2008. Mr. Funk is an independent consultant and producer with over 30 years of experience in the energy
industry. Mr. Funk served as Sr. Vice President of Equitable Resources and President of Equitable Production Co. from
June 2000 until January 2003. Previously, Mr. Funk worked for 23 years at Shell Oil Company in senior management and
technical positions. Mr. Funk has previously served on the boards of Westport Resources (April 2000 to June 2004) and
Matador Resources Company (January 2003 to December 2008). Mr. Funk currently serves as a Director of Superior Energy
Services, Inc. a public oil field services company headquartered in New Orleans, Louisiana. Mr. Funk received an A.B.
degree in Geology from Wittenberg University, a M.S. in Geology from the University of Connecticut, and a PhD in Geology
from the University of Kansas. Mr. Funk is a Certified Petroleum Geologist.
Allen Finkelson became a director in 1994. Mr. Finkelson has been a partner at Cravath,
Swaine & Moore LLP since 1977, with the exception of the period 1983 through 1985, when he was a
managing director of Lehman Brothers Kuhn Loeb Incorporated. Mr. Finkelson joined Cravath, Swaine
& Moore, LLP in 1971. Mr. Finkelson earned a Bachelor of Arts from St. Lawrence University and a
J.D. from Columbia University School of Law.
Jonathan S. Linker became a director in 2002. Mr. Linker previously served as a director of
Range from 1998 to 2000. He has been active in the energy industry since 1972. Mr. Linker joined
First Reserve Corporation in 1988 and was a Managing Director of the
firm from 1996 through
2001. Mr. Linker is currently Manager of Houston Energy Advisors LLC, an investment advisor
providing management and investment services to two private equity funds. Mr. Linker has been
President and a director of IDC Energy Corporation since 1987, a director and officer of Sunset
Production Corporation since 1991 serving currently as Chairman, and Manager of Shelby Resources
Inc., all small, privately-owned exploration and production companies. Mr. Linker received a
Bachelor of Arts in Geology from Amherst College, a Masters in Geology from Harvard University and
an MBA from Harvard Graduate School of Business Administration.
Kevin S. McCarthy became a director in 2005. Mr. McCarthy is Chairman, Chief Executive
Officer and President of Kayne Anderson MLP Investment Company, Kayne Anderson Energy Total Return
Fund, Inc. and Kayne Anderson Energy Development Company, which are each NYSE listed closed-end
investment companies. Mr. McCarthy joined Kayne Anderson Capital Advisors as a Senior Managing
Director in 2004 from UBS Securities LLC where he was global head of energy investment banking. In
this role, he had senior responsibility for all of UBS energy investment banking activities,
including direct responsibilities for securities underwriting and mergers and acquisitions in the
energy industry. From 1995 to 2000, Mr. McCarthy led the energy investment banking activities of
Dean Witter Reynolds and then PaineWebber Incorporated. He began his investment banking career in
1984. He is also on the board of directors of Clearwater Natural
Resources, L.P., Pro Petro Services, Inc. and Direct Fuel
Partners, L.P, three private energy companies. He earned a Bachelor of Arts in Economics and Geology from
Amherst College and an MBA in Finance from the University of Pennsylvanias Wharton School.
John H. Pinkerton, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and a director, became a director in 1988
and was elected Chairman of the Board of Directors in 2008. He joined Range as President in 1990
and was appointed Chief Executive Officer in 1992. Previously, Mr. Pinkerton was Senior Vice
President of Snyder Oil Corporation (Snyder). Before joining Snyder in 1980, Mr. Pinkerton was
with Arthur Andersen. Mr. Pinkerton received his Bachelor of Arts in Business Administration from
Texas Christian University and a Masters degree from the University of Texas at Arlington.
Jeffrey L. Ventura, President and Chief Operating Officer, joined Range in 2003 and became a
director in 2005. Previously, Mr. Ventura served as President and Chief Operating Officer of
Matador Petroleum Corporation which he joined in 1997. Before 1997, Mr. Ventura spent eight years
at Maxus Energy Corporation where he managed various engineering, exploration and development
operations and was responsible for coordination of engineering technology. Previously, Mr. Ventura
was with Tenneco Inc., where he held various engineering and operating positions. Mr. Ventura
holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering from the Pennsylvania
State University.
Roger S. Manny, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Manny joined Range
in 2003. Previously, Mr. Manny served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Matador Petroleum Corporation from 1998 until joining Range. Before 1998, Mr. Manny spent 18 years
at Bank of America and its predecessors where he served as Senior Vice President in the energy
group. Mr. Manny holds a Bachelor of Business Administration degree from the University of Houston
and a Masters of Business Administration from Houston Baptist University.
48
Alan W. Farquharson, Senior Vice President Reservoir Engineering, joined Range in 1998.
Mr. Farquharson has held the positions of Manager and Vice President of Reservoir Engineering
before being promoted to his senior position in February 2007. Previously, Mr. Farquharson held
positions with Union Pacific Resources including Engineering Manager Business Development
International. Before that, Mr. Farquharson held various technical and managerial positions at
Amoco and Hunt Oil. He holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Electrical Engineering from the
Pennsylvania State University.
Steven L. Grose, Senior Vice President Appalachia, joined Range in 1980. Previously, Mr.
Grose was employed by Halliburton Services, Inc. from 1971 until 1978. Mr. Grose is a member of
the Society of Petroleum Engineers and is a past president of The Ohio Oil and Gas Association.
Mr. Grose holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Petroleum Engineering from Marietta College.
David P. Poole, Senior Vice President General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, joined Range
in June 2008. Mr. Poole has approximately 20 years of experience serving in various legal
capacities. From 2004 until March 2008 he was with TXU Corp., serving most recently as Executive
Vice President Legal, and General Counsel. Prior to joining TXU, Mr. Poole spent 16 years with
Hunton & Williams LLP and its predecessor, where he last served as the Managing Partner of the
Dallas office. Mr. Poole graduated from Texas Tech University with a B.S. in Petroleum Engineering
and a J.D. magna cum laude from Texas Tech University School of Law.
Chad L. Stephens, Senior Vice President Corporate Development, joined Range in 1990.
Before 2002, Mr. Stephens held the position of Senior Vice President Southwest. Previously, Mr.
Stephens was with Duer Wagner & Co., an independent oil and gas producer for approximately two
years. Before that, Mr. Stephens was an independent oil operator in Midland, Texas for four years.
From 1979 to 1984, Mr. Stephens was with Cities Service Company and HNG Oil Company. Mr. Stephens
holds a Bachelor of Arts in Finance and Land Management from the University of Texas.
Rodney L. Waller, Senior Vice President, Chief Compliance Officer and Assistant Corporate
Secretary, joined Range in 1999. Mr. Waller served as Corporate Secretary from 1999 until 2008
and now serves as Assistant Corporate Secretary. In 2005, Mr. Waller was designated by our Board
of Directors as the Chief Compliance Officer. Previously, Mr. Waller was Senior Vice President of
Snyder Oil Corporation, now part of Devon Energy Corporation. Before joining Snyder, Mr. Waller
was with Arthur Andersen. Mr. Waller is a certified public accountant and petroleum land man. Mr.
Waller served as a director of Range from 1988 to 1994. Mr. Waller received a Bachelor of Arts
degree in Accounting from Harding University.
Mark D. Whitley, Senior Vice President Southwest Business Unit and Engineering Technology,
joined Range in 2005. Previously, he served as Vice President Operations with Quicksilver
Resources for two years. Before joining Quicksilver, he served as Production/Operation Manager for
Devon Energy, following the Devon/Mitchell merger. From 1982 to 2002, Mr. Whitley held a variety
of technical and managerial roles with Mitchell Energy. Notably, he led the team of engineers at
Mitchell Energy who applied new stimulation techniques to unlock the shale gas potential in the
Fort Worth Basin. Previous positions included serving as a production and reservoir engineer with
Shell Oil. He holds a Bachelors degree in Chemical Engineering from Worcester Polytechnic
Institute and a Masters degree in Chemical Engineering from the University of Kentucky.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
See the material appearing under the heading Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting
Compliance in the Range Proxy Statement for the 2009 Annual Meeting of stockholders which is
incorporated herein by reference. Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors,
officers (including a person performing a principal policy-making function) and persons who own
more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities to file with the Commission initial
reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of our common stock and other equity
securities. Directors, officers and 10% holders are required by Commission regulations to send us
copies of all of the Section 16(a) reports they file. Based solely on a review of the copies of
the forms sent to us and the representations made by the reporting persons to us, we believe that,
other than as described below, during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, our directors,
officers and 10% holders complied with all filing requirements under Section 16(a) of the Exchange
Act. Each of the following had one delinquent Form-4 filing on February 15, 2008 for a
transaction that occurred on February 12, 2008: Mr. Alan
Farquharson, Mr. Roger Manny, Mr. John Pinkerton, Mr. Chad Stephens,
Mr. Jeffrey Ventura, Mr. Rodney Waller and Mr. Mark Whitley.
49
In addition, Mr. Chad Stephens had an additional delinquent Form-4 filing on May 14, 2008 for
a transaction that occurred on May 9, 2008. Mr. David Poole had a delinquent Form-4 filing on
February 12, 2009 for a transaction that occurred on September 12, 2008.
Code of Ethics
Code of Ethics. We have adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to our principal
executive officers, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer, or persons
performing similar functions (as well as directors and all other employees). A copy is available
on our website, www.rangeresources.com and a copy in print will be provided to any person without
charge, upon request. Such requests should be directed to the Corporate Secretary, 100
Throckmorton Street, Suite 1200, Fort Worth, Texas 76102 or by calling (817) 870-2601. We intend
to disclose any amendments to or waivers of the Code of Ethics on behalf of our Chief Executive
Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Controller and persons performing similar functions on our
website, under the Corporate Governance caption, promptly following the date of such amendment or
waiver.
Identifying and Evaluating Nominees for Directors
See the material under the heading Consideration of Director Nominees in the Range Proxy
Statement for the 2009 Annual Meeting of stockholders, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Audit Committee
See the material under the heading Audit Committee in the Range Proxy Statement for the 2009
Annual Meeting of stockholders, which is incorporated herein by reference.
NYSE 303A Certification
The Chief Executive Officer of Range Resources Corporation made an unqualified certification
to the NYSE with respect to the Companys compliance with the NYSE Corporate Governance listing
standards on May 28, 2008.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Information required by this item is incorporated by reference to such information as set
forth in the Range Proxy Statement for the 2009 Annual Meeting of stockholders.
|
|
|
ITEM 12. |
|
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS |
Information required by this item is incorporated by reference to such information as set
forth in the Range Proxy Statement for the 2009 Annual Meeting of stockholders.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
Information required by this item is incorporated by reference to such information as set
forth in the Range Proxy Statement for the 2009 Annual Meeting of stockholders.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
Information required by this item is incorporated by reference to such information as set
forth in the Range Proxy Statement for the 2009 Annual Meeting of stockholders.
50
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a) Documents filed as part of the report
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
Index to Financial Statements |
|
F- 1 |
|
|
|
Managements Report on Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting |
|
F- 2 |
|
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Internal Control Over Financial Reporting |
|
F- 3 |
|
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Consolidated Financial Statements |
|
F- 4 |
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 |
|
F- 5 |
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 |
|
F- 6 |
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Year Ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 |
|
F- 7 |
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity for the Year Ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 |
|
F- 8 |
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Year Ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 |
|
F- 9 |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
|
F- 10 |
|
|
|
Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited) |
|
F- 35 |
|
|
|
Supplemental Information on Natural Gas and Oil Exploration, Development and Production Activities (Unaudited) |
|
F- 37 |
|
2. |
|
All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable, not required, or because the
required information is included in the financial statements or related notes. |
|
|
3. |
|
Exhibits: |
|
|
|
|
(a) See Index of Exhibits on page 55 for a description of the exhibits filed as a part of this report. |
51
GLOSSARY OF CERTAIN DEFINED TERMS
The terms defined in this glossary are used in this report.
bbl. One stock tank barrel, or 42 U.S. gallons liquid volumes, used herein in reference to crude
oil or other liquid hydrocarbons.
bcf. One billion cubic feet of gas.
bcfe. One billion cubic feet of natural gas equivalents, based on a ratio of 6 mcf for each barrel
of oil or NGL, which reflects relative energy content.
development well. A well drilled within the proved area of an oil or natural gas reservoir to the
depth of a stratigraphic horizon known to be productive.
dry hole. A well found to be incapable of producing oil or natural gas in sufficient economic
quantities.
exploratory well. A well drilled to find oil or gas in an unproved area, to find a new reservoir
in an existing field or to extend a known reservoir.
gross acres or gross wells. The total acres or wells, as the case may be, in which a working
interest is owned.
infill well. A well drilled between known producing wells to better exploit the reservoir.
LIBOR. London Interbank Offer Rate, the rate of interest at which banks offer to lend to one
another in the wholesale money markets in the City of London. This rate is a yardstick for lenders
involved in many debt transactions.
Mbbl. One thousand barrels of crude oil or other liquid hydrocarbons.
mcf. One thousand cubic feet of gas.
mcf per day. One thousand cubic feet of gas per day.
mcfe. One thousand cubic feet of natural gas equivalents, based on a ratio of 6 mcf for each
barrel of oil or NGL, which reflects relative energy content.
Mmbbl. One million barrels of crude oil or other liquid hydrocarbons.
Mmbtu. One million British thermal units. A British thermal unit is the heat required to raise
the temperature of one pound of water from 58.5 to 59.5 degrees Fahrenheit.
Mmcf. One million cubic feet of gas.
Mmcfe. One million cubic feet of gas equivalents.
NGLs. Natural gas liquids.
net acres or net wells. The sum of the fractional working interests owned in gross acres or gross
wells.
present value (PV). The present value of future net cash flows, using a 10% discount rate, from
estimated proved reserves, using constant prices and costs in effect on the date of the report
(unless such prices or costs are subject to change pursuant to contractual provisions). The after
tax present value is the Standardized Measure.
productive well. A well that is producing oil or gas or that is capable of production.
proved developed non-producing reserves. Reserves that consist of (i) proved reserves from wells
which have been completed and tested but are not producing due to lack of market or minor
completion problems which are expected to be corrected and (ii) proved reserves currently behind
the pipe in existing wells and which are expected to be productive due to both the well log
characteristics and analogous production in the immediate vicinity of the wells.
52
proved developed reserves. Proved reserves that can be expected to be recovered through existing
wells with existing equipment and operating methods.
proved reserves. The estimated quantities of crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids which
geological and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be recoverable in future
years from known reservoirs under existing economics and operating conditions.
proved undeveloped reserves. Proved reserves that are expected to be recovered from new wells on
undrilled acreage, or from existing wells where a relatively major expenditure is required for
recompletion.
recompletion. The completion for production an existing well bore in another formation from that
in which the well has been previously completed.
reserve life index. Proved reserves at a point in time divided by the then production rate (annual
or quarterly).
royalty acreage. Acreage represented by a fee mineral or royalty interest which entitles the owner
to receive free and clear of all production costs a specified portion of the oil and gas produced
or a specified portion of the value of such production.
royalty interest. An interest in an oil and gas property entitling the owner to a share of oil and
natural gas production free of costs of production.
Standardized Measure. The present value, discounted at 10%, of future net cash flows from
estimated proved reserves after income taxes, calculated holding prices and costs constant at
amounts in effect on the date of the report (unless such prices or costs are subject to change
pursuant to contractual provisions) and otherwise in accordance with the Commissions rules for
inclusion of oil and gas reserve information in financial statements filed with the Commission.
working interest. The operating interest that gives the owner the right to drill, produce and
conduct operating activities on the property and a share of production, subject to all royalties,
overriding royalties and other burdens, and to all costs of exploration, development and
operations, and all risks in connection therewith.
53
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
Dated: February 24, 2009
RANGE RESOURCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ John H. Pinkerton
|
|
|
|
John H. Pinkerton |
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been
signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacity and on the
dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ John H. Pinkerton
John H. Pinkerton
|
|
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer
|
|
February 24, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Jeffrey L. Ventura
Jeffrey L. Ventura
|
|
Director, President and Chief Operating Officer
|
|
February 24, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Roger S. Manny
Roger S. Manny
|
|
Chief Financial and Accounting Officer
|
|
February 24, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Charles L. Blackburn
Charles L. Blackburn
|
|
Director
|
|
February 24, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Anthony V. Dub
Anthony V. Dub
|
|
Director
|
|
February 24, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ V. Richard Eales
V. Richard Eales
|
|
Lead Independent Director
|
|
February 24, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Allen Finkelson
Allen Finkelson
|
|
Director
|
|
February 24, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ James M. Funk
James M. Funk
|
|
Director
|
|
February 24, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Jonathan S. Linker
Jonathan S. Linker
|
|
Director
|
|
February 24, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Kevin S. McCarthy
Kevin S. McCarthy
|
|
Director
|
|
February 24, 2009
|
|
|
54
RANGE RESOURCES CORPORATION
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
|
Number |
|
|
F- 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
F- 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
F- 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
F- 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
F- 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
F- 7 |
|
|
|
|
|
F- 8 |
|
|
|
|
|
F- 9 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-10 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-35 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-37 |
F-1
MANAGEMENTS REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Range Resources Corporation:
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over
financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Our
internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance to management
and the board of directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial
statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not
prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with
respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Management assessed the effectiveness
of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008. In making this
assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of
the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control Integrated Framework. Based on our
assessment, we believe that, as of December 31, 2008, our internal control over financial reporting
is effective based on those criteria.
Ernst and Young, LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited our
financial statements included in this annual report, has issued an attestation report on our
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008. This report appears on the
following page.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ John H. Pinkerton
John H. Pinkerton
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Roger S. Manny
Roger S. Manny
|
|
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
Fort Worth, Texas
February 24, 2009
F-2
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Range Resources Corporation:
We have audited Range Resources Corporations internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2008, based on criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Range
Resources Corporations management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over
financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting included in the accompanying Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Companys internal control over
financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was
maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and
evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk,
and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe
that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles. A companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and
procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately
and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide
reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and
expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and
directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have
a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent
or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods
are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or
that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Range Resources Corporation maintained, in all material respects, effective
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Range Resources Corporation as
of December 31, 2008 and 2007 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders
equity, comprehensive income and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2008 and our report dated February 23, 2009 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Ernst & Young LLP
Fort Worth, Texas
February 23, 2009
F-3
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Range Resources Corporation:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Range Resources Corporation
(the Company) as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders equity, comprehensive income and cash flows for each of the three years
in the period ended December 31, 2008. These consolidated financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the
amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the
overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the consolidated financial position of Range Resources Corporation at December
31, 2008 and 2007, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 2008, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles.
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, in 2008, the Company adopted
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets
and Financial Liabilities Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), Range Resources Corporations internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on criteria established in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our
report dated February 23, 2009 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Ernst & Young LLP
Fort Worth, Texas
February 23, 2009
F-4
RANGE RESOURCES CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents |
|
$ |
753 |
|
|
$ |
4,018 |
|
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $954 and $583 |
|
|
162,201 |
|
|
|
166,484 |
|
Unrealized derivative gain |
|
|
221,430 |
|
|
|
53,018 |
|
Deferred tax asset |
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,907 |
|
Inventory and other |
|
|
19,927 |
|
|
|
11,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
$ |
404,311 |
|
|
$ |
261,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized derivative gain |
|
|
5,231 |
|
|
|
1,082 |
|
Equity method investments |
|
|
147,126 |
|
|
|
113,722 |
|
Oil and gas properties, successful efforts method |
|
|
6,039,644 |
|
|
|
4,443,577 |
|
Accumulated depletion and depreciation |
|
|
(1,186,934 |
) |
|
|
(939,769 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,852,710 |
|
|
|
3,503,808 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transportation and field assets |
|
|
142,662 |
|
|
|
104,802 |
|
Accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(56,434 |
) |
|
|
(43,676 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86,228 |
|
|
|
61,126 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
66,937 |
|
|
|
74,956 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
5,562,543 |
|
|
$ |
4,016,508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
250,640 |
|
|
$ |
212,514 |
|
Asset retirement obligations |
|
|
2,055 |
|
|
|
1,903 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
47,309 |
|
|
|
42,964 |
|
Deferred tax liability |
|
|
32,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
20,516 |
|
|
|
17,595 |
|
Unrealized derivative loss |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
30,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
353,514 |
|
|
|
305,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank debt |
|
|
693,000 |
|
|
|
303,500 |
|
Subordinated notes and other long term debt |
|
|
1,097,668 |
|
|
|
847,158 |
|
Deferred tax liability |
|
|
783,391 |
|
|
|
590,786 |
|
Unrealized derivative loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,819 |
|
Deferred compensation liability |
|
|
93,247 |
|
|
|
120,223 |
|
Asset retirement obligations and other liabilities |
|
|
83,890 |
|
|
|
75,567 |
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $1 par, 10,000,000 shares authorized, none issued
and outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par, 475,000,000 shares authorized, 155,609,387 issued
at December 31, 2008 and 149,667,497 issued at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
1,556 |
|
|
|
1,497 |
|
Common stock held in treasury, 233,900 shares at December 31, 2008
and 155,500 shares at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
(8,557 |
) |
|
|
(5,334 |
) |
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
1,695,268 |
|
|
|
1,386,884 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
692,059 |
|
|
|
371,800 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
77,507 |
|
|
|
(26,825 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
2,457,833 |
|
|
|
1,728,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
5,562,543 |
|
|
$ |
4,016,508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F- 5
RANGE RESOURCES CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and gas sales |
|
$ |
1,226,560 |
|
|
$ |
862,537 |
|
|
$ |
599,139 |
|
Transportation and gathering |
|
|
4,577 |
|
|
|
2,290 |
|
|
|
2,422 |
|
Derivative fair value income (loss) |
|
|
70,135 |
|
|
|
(7,767 |
) |
|
|
142,395 |
|
Other |
|
|
21,675 |
|
|
|
5,031 |
|
|
|
856 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
1,322,947 |
|
|
|
862,091 |
|
|
|
744,812 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct operating |
|
|
142,387 |
|
|
|
107,499 |
|
|
|
81,261 |
|
Production and ad valorem taxes |
|
|
55,172 |
|
|
|
42,443 |
|
|
|
36,415 |
|
Exploration |
|
|
67,690 |
|
|
|
43,345 |
|
|
|
44,088 |
|
Abandonment and impairment of unproved properties |
|
|
47,906 |
|
|
|
6,750 |
|
|
|
257 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
92,308 |
|
|
|
69,670 |
|
|
|
49,886 |
|
Deferred compensation plan |
|
|
(24,689 |
) |
|
|
28,332 |
|
|
|
6,873 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
99,748 |
|
|
|
77,737 |
|
|
|
55,849 |
|
Depletion, depreciation and amortization |
|
|
299,831 |
|
|
|
220,578 |
|
|
|
154,482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
780,353 |
|
|
|
596,354 |
|
|
|
429,111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
542,594 |
|
|
|
265,737 |
|
|
|
315,701 |
|
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
4,268 |
|
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
1,912 |
|
Deferred |
|
|
192,168 |
|
|
|
98,441 |
|
|
|
119,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
196,436 |
|
|
|
98,761 |
|
|
|
121,752 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
346,158 |
|
|
|
166,976 |
|
|
|
193,949 |
|
|
Discontinued operations, net of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,593 |
|
|
|
(35,247 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
346,158 |
|
|
$ |
230,569 |
|
|
$ |
158,702 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic-income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
2.29 |
|
|
$ |
1.16 |
|
|
$ |
1.45 |
|
-discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.44 |
|
|
|
(0.26 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-net income |
|
$ |
2.29 |
|
|
$ |
1.60 |
|
|
$ |
1.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted-income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
2.22 |
|
|
$ |
1.11 |
|
|
$ |
1.39 |
|
-discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.43 |
|
|
|
(0.25 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-net income |
|
$ |
2.22 |
|
|
$ |
1.54 |
|
|
$ |
1.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
151,116 |
|
|
|
143,791 |
|
|
|
133,751 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
155,943 |
|
|
|
149,911 |
|
|
|
138,711 |
|
See accompanying notes.
F- 6
RANGE RESOURCES CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
346,158 |
|
|
$ |
230,569 |
|
|
$ |
158,702 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net cash provided from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Income) loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(63,593 |
) |
|
|
35,247 |
|
Loss (income) from equity method investments |
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
(974 |
) |
|
|
(548 |
) |
Deferred income tax expense |
|
|
192,168 |
|
|
|
98,441 |
|
|
|
119,840 |
|
Depletion, depreciation and amortization |
|
|
299,831 |
|
|
|
220,578 |
|
|
|
154,482 |
|
Exploration dry hole costs |
|
|
13,371 |
|
|
|
15,149 |
|
|
|
15,089 |
|
Mark-to-market on oil and gas derivatives not designated as hedges |
|
|
(83,868 |
) |
|
|
78,769 |
|
|
|
(86,491 |
) |
Abandonment and impairment of unproved properties |
|
|
47,906 |
|
|
|
6,750 |
|
|
|
257 |
|
Unrealized derivative (gains) loss |
|
|
(1,695 |
) |
|
|
820 |
|
|
|
(5,654 |
) |
Allowance for bad debts |
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80 |
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs and other |
|
|
2,900 |
|
|
|
2,277 |
|
|
|
1,827 |
|
Deferred and stock-based compensation |
|
|
6,621 |
|
|
|
54,152 |
|
|
|
27,455 |
|
(Gain) losses on sale of assets and other |
|
|
(19,507 |
) |
|
|
2,212 |
|
|
|
940 |
|
Changes in working capital, net of amounts from business acquisitions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
6,701 |
|
|
|
(50,570 |
) |
|
|
30,185 |
|
Inventory and other |
|
|
(9,246 |
) |
|
|
(1,040 |
) |
|
|
(1,157 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
10,663 |
|
|
|
28,640 |
|
|
|
(5,049 |
) |
Accrued liabilities and other |
|
|
12,096 |
|
|
|
9,922 |
|
|
|
(3,696 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided from continuing operations |
|
|
824,767 |
|
|
|
632,102 |
|
|
|
441,509 |
|
Net cash provided from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,189 |
|
|
|
38,366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided from operating activities |
|
|
824,767 |
|
|
|
642,291 |
|
|
|
479,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to oil and gas properties |
|
|
(881,950 |
) |
|
|
(782,398 |
) |
|
|
(487,245 |
) |
Additions to field service assets |
|
|
(36,076 |
) |
|
|
(26,044 |
) |
|
|
(14,449 |
) |
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
|
|
(834,758 |
) |
|
|
(336,453 |
) |
|
|
(360,149 |
) |
Investing activities of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,375 |
) |
|
|
(29,195 |
) |
Investment in equity method investment and other assets |
|
|
(44,162 |
) |
|
|
(94,630 |
) |
|
|
(21,009 |
) |
Proceeds from disposal of assets and discontinued operations |
|
|
68,231 |
|
|
|
234,332 |
|
|
|
388 |
|
Purchase of marketable securities held by the deferred compensation
plan |
|
|
(11,208 |
) |
|
|
(48,018 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the sales of marketable securities held by the deferred
compensation plan |
|
|
8,146 |
|
|
|
40,014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(1,731,777 |
) |
|
|
(1,020,572 |
) |
|
|
(911,659 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowing on credit facilities |
|
|
1,476,000 |
|
|
|
864,500 |
|
|
|
802,500 |
|
Repayment on credit facilities |
|
|
(1,086,500 |
) |
|
|
(1,013,000 |
) |
|
|
(619,700 |
) |
Issuance of subordinated notes |
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
249,500 |
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(24,625 |
) |
|
|
(19,082 |
) |
|
|
(12,189 |
) |
Debt issuance costs |
|
|
(8,710 |
) |
|
|
(3,686 |
) |
|
|
(6,960 |
) |
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
291,183 |
|
|
|
296,229 |
|
|
|
16,265 |
|
Other debt repayment/financing |
|
|
4,420 |
|
|
|
3,877 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the sales of common stock held by the deferred
compensation plan |
|
|
5,303 |
|
|
|
6,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of common stock held by the deferred compensation plan and
other
treasury stock purchases |
|
|
(3,326 |
) |
|
|
(5,426 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided from financing activities |
|
|
903,745 |
|
|
|
379,917 |
|
|
|
429,416 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease) increase in cash and equivalents |
|
|
(3,265 |
) |
|
|
1,636 |
|
|
|
(2,368 |
) |
Cash and equivalents at beginning of year |
|
|
4,018 |
|
|
|
2,382 |
|
|
|
4,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents at end of year |
|
$ |
753 |
|
|
$ |
4,018 |
|
|
$ |
2,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F- 7
RANGE RESOURCES CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained |
|
|
|
other |
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
Treasury |
|
Additional |
|
earnings |
|
Deferred |
|
comprehensive (loss) |
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
Par value |
|
common stock |
|
paid-in capital |
|
(deficit) |
|
compensation |
|
income |
|
Total |
Balance
December 31, 2005 |
|
|
129,913 |
|
|
$ |
1,299 |
|
|
$ |
(81 |
) |
|
$ |
833,667 |
|
|
$ |
13,800 |
|
|
$ |
(4,635 |
) |
|
$ |
(147,127 |
) |
|
$ |
696,923 |
|
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
9,018 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
203,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
208,005 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,991 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,991 |
|
Common dividends declared
($0.09 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,189 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,189 |
) |
Treasury stock issuance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81 |
|
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
183,648 |
|
|
|
183,648 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
158,702 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
158,702 |
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
138,931 |
|
|
|
1,389 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,057,938 |
|
|
|
160,313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,521 |
|
|
|
1,256,161 |
|
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
10,736 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
312,427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
312,535 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,519 |
|
Common dividends declared
($0.13 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,082 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,082 |
) |
Treasury stock purchase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,334 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,334 |
) |
Other comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(63,346 |
) |
|
|
(63,346 |
) |
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
230,569 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
230,569 |
|
|
|
|
Balance
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
149,667 |
|
|
|
1,497 |
|
|
|
(5,334 |
) |
|
|
1,386,884 |
|
|
|
371,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,825 |
) |
|
|
1,728,022 |
|
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
5,942 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
291,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
291,881 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,562 |
|
Common dividends declared
($0.16 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,625 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,625 |
) |
Treasury stock purchase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,223 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,223 |
) |
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103,058 |
|
|
|
103,058 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
346,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
346,158 |
|
Adoption of SFAS No. 159, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,274 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,274 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
155,609 |
|
|
$ |
1,556 |
|
|
$ |
(8,557 |
) |
|
$ |
1,695,268 |
|
|
$ |
692,059 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
77,507 |
|
|
$ |
2,457,833 |
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F- 8
RANGE RESOURCES CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
346,158 |
|
|
$ |
230,569 |
|
|
$ |
158,702 |
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized loss (gain) on hedge derivative contract
settlements reclassified into earnings from other
comprehensive (loss) income |
|
|
38,557 |
|
|
|
(3,231 |
) |
|
|
60,764 |
|
Change in unrealized deferred hedging gains (losses) |
|
|
64,501 |
|
|
|
(54,954 |
) |
|
|
120,832 |
|
Change in unrealized (losses) gains on securities held by
deferred compensation plan, net of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,161 |
) |
|
|
2,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
$ |
449,216 |
|
|
$ |
167,223 |
|
|
$ |
342,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F- 9
RANGE RESOURCES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(1) SUMMARY OF ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF BUSINESS
Range Resources Corporation (Range, we, us, or our) is engaged in the exploration,
development and acquisition of oil and gas properties primarily in the Southwestern, Appalachian
and Gulf Coast regions of the United States. We seek to increase our reserves and production
primarily through drilling and complementary acquisitions. Range is a Delaware corporation with
its common stock trading on the New York Stock Exchange.
(2) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of all of our
subsidiaries. Investments in entities over which we have significant influence, but not control,
are accounted for using the equity method of accounting and are carried at our share of net assets
plus loans and advances. Income from equity method investments represents our proportionate share
of income generated by equity method investees and is included in
Other revenues on our
consolidated statement of operations. All material intercompany balances and transactions have
been eliminated.
During the first quarter of 2007, we sold our interests in our Austin Chalk properties that we
purchased as part of the Stroud acquisition (see also Note 3). We also sold our Gulf of Mexico
properties at the end of the first quarter of 2007. In accordance with Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 144, Accounting
for the Impairment of Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, we have reflected the results of operations
of the above divestitures as discontinued operations, rather than a component of continuing
operations. All periods presented reflect our Gulf of Mexico operations as discontinued
operations. See also Note 4 for additional information regarding discontinued operations.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles in the United States requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at
year-end, the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the year and the reported amount of
proved oil and gas reserves. We base our estimates on historical experience and various other
assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the
basis for making judgments that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results could
differ from the estimates and assumptions used.
Income per Common Share
Basic net income per share is calculated based on the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding. Diluted net income per share assumes issuance of stock compensation awards, provided
the effect is not antidilutive.
Business Segment Information
SFAS No. 131, Disclosure about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information,
establishes standards for reporting information about operating segments. Operating segments are
defined as components of an enterprise that engage in activities from which it may earn revenues
and incur expenses for which separate operational financial information is available and this
information is regularly evaluated by the chief decision maker for the purpose of allocating
resources and assessing performance.
Segment reporting is not applicable to us as we have a single company-wide management team
that administers all properties as a whole rather than by discrete operating segments. We track
only basic operational data by area. We do not maintain complete separate financial statement
information by area. We measure financial performance as a single enterprise and not on an
area-by-area basis. Throughout the year, we allocate capital resources on a project-by-project
basis, across our entire asset base to maximize profitability without regard to individual areas or
segments.
F- 10
Revenue Recognition and Gas Imbalances
Oil, gas and natural gas liquids revenues are recognized when the products are sold and
delivery to the purchaser has occurred. We recognize the cost of revenues, such a transportation
and compression expense, as a reduction to revenue. Although receivables are concentrated in the
oil and gas industry, we do not view this as unusual credit risk. We provide for an allowance for
doubtful accounts for specific receivables judged unlikely to be collected based on the age of the
receivable, our experience with the debtor, potential offsets to the amount owed and economic
conditions. In certain instances, we require purchasers to post stand-by letters of credit. Many
of our receivables are from joint interest owners of properties we operate. Thus, we may have the
ability to withhold future revenue disbursements to recover any non-payment of joint interest
billings. We have allowances for doubtful accounts relating to exploration and production
receivables of $954,000 at December 31, 2008 compared to $583,000 at December 31, 2007.
We use the sales method to account for gas imbalances, recognizing revenue based on gas
delivered rather than our working interest share of the gas produced. A liability is recognized
when the imbalance exceeds the estimate of remaining reserves. Gas imbalances at December 31, 2008
and December 31, 2007 were not significant. At December 31, 2008, we had recorded a net liability
of $480,000 for those wells where it was determined that there were insufficient reserves to
recover the imbalance situation.
Cash and Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand and on deposit and investments in highly liquid
debt instruments with maturities of three months or less.
Marketable Securities
Holdings of equity securities held in our deferred compensation plans qualify as trading and
are recorded at fair value. Investments in the deferred compensation plans are in mutual funds.
Inventories
Inventories consist primarily of tubular goods used in our operations and are stated at the
lower of specific cost of each inventory item or market value.
Oil and Gas Properties
We follow the successful efforts method of accounting for oil and gas producing activities.
Costs to drill exploratory wells that do not find proved reserves, geological and geophysical
costs, delay rentals and costs of carrying and retaining unproved properties are expensed. Costs
incurred for exploratory wells that find reserves that cannot yet be classified as proved are
capitalized if (a) the well has found a sufficient quantity of reserves to justify its completion
as a producing well and (b) we are making sufficient progress assessing the reserves and the
economic and operating viability of the project. The status of suspended well costs is monitored
continuously and reviewed not less than quarterly. We capitalize successful
exploratory wells and all developmental wells, whether successful or
not. Oil and NGLs are converted to
gas equivalent basis or mcfe at the rate of one barrel of oil
equating to 6 mcf of gas. Depreciation, depletion and amortization of
proved producing properties is provided on the units of production
method based on estimated proved oil and gas reserves.
Our long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment periodically as events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Long-lived
assets are reviewed for potential impairments at the lowest levels for which there are identifiable
cash flows that are largely independent of other groups of assets. The review is done by
determining if the historical cost of proved properties less the applicable accumulated
depreciation, depletion and amortization is less than the estimated expected undiscounted future
net cash flows. The expected future net cash flows are estimated based on our plans to produce and
develop proved reserves. Expected future net cash inflow from the sale of production of reserves
is calculated based on estimated future prices and estimated operating and development costs. We
estimate prices based upon market related information including published futures prices. The
estimated future level of production is based on assumptions surrounding future levels of prices
and costs, field decline rates, market demand and supply, and the economic and regulatory climates.
When the carrying value exceeds the sum of future net cash flows, an impairment loss is recognized
for the difference between the estimated fair market value (as determined by discounted future net
cash flows) and the carrying value of the asset. A significant amount of judgment is involved in
performing these evaluations since the results are based on estimated future events. Such events
include a projection of future oil and gas prices, an estimate of the ultimate amount of
recoverable oil and gas reserves that will be produced from a field, the timing of future
production, future production costs, future abandonment costs and future inflation. We cannot
predict whether impairment charges may be required in the future.
Proceeds from the disposal of miscellaneous properties are credited to the net book
value of their amortization group with no immediate effect on income. However, gain or loss is
recognized from the sale of less than an entire amortization
F- 11
group if the disposition is significant enough to materially impact the depletion rate of the
remaining properties in the amortization base.
We
adhere to the SFAS No. 19, Financial Accounting and
Reporting by Oil and Gas Producing Companies, for recognizing any impairment of capitalized costs
related to unproved properties. The majority of these costs generally relate to the acquisition of
leasehold costs. The costs are capitalized and periodically evaluated (at least quarterly) as to
recoverability, based on changes brought about by economic factors and potential shifts in business
strategy employed by management. We consider a combination of time, geologic and engineering
factors to evaluate the need for impairment of these costs. Unproved properties had a net book
value of $766.2 million in 2008 compared to $271.4 million in 2007 and $226.2 million in 2006. The
increase from 2007 represents additional acreage purchases primarily in the Marcellus and Barnett
Shale. We have recorded abandonment and impairment expense related to unproved properties of $47.9
million in 2008 compared to $6.8 million in 2007 and $257,000 in 2006.
Transportation and Field Assets
Our gas transportation and gathering systems are generally located in proximity to certain of
our principal fields. Depreciation on these systems is provided on the straight-line method based
on estimated useful lives of 10 to 15 years. We receive third-party income for providing field
service and certain transportation services, which are recognized as earned. Depreciation on the
associated assets is calculated on the straight-line method based on estimated useful lives ranging
from five to seven years. Buildings are depreciated over 10 to 15 years. Depreciation expense was
$13.7 million in 2008 compared to $10.9 million in 2007 and $7.5 million in 2006.
Other Assets
The expenses of issuing debt are capitalized and included in other assets on our consolidated
balance sheet. These costs are amortized over the expected life of the related instruments. When
a security is retired before maturity or modifications significantly change the cash flows, related
unamortized costs are expensed. Other assets at December 31, 2008 include $21.7 million of
unamortized debt issuance costs, $33.5 million of marketable securities held in our deferred
compensation plans and $11.7 million of other investments.
Stock-based Compensation
The 2005 Equity Based Compensation Plan (the 2005 Plan) authorizes the Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors to grant, among other things, stock options, stock appreciation
rights and restricted stock awards to employees. The 2004 Non-Employee Director Stock Plan (the
Director Plan) allows grants to our non-employee directors of our Board of Directors. The 2005
Plan was approved by stockholders in May 2005 and replaced our 1999 stock option plan. No new
grants will be made from the 1999 stock option plan. The number of shares that may be issued under
the 2005 Plan is equal to (i) 5.6 million shares (15.0 million less the 2.2 million shares issued
under the 1999 Stock Options Plan before May 18, 2005, the effective date of the 2005 Plan and less
the 7.2 million shares issuable pursuant to awards under the 1999 Stock Option Plan outstanding as
of the effective date of the 2005 Plan) plus (ii) the number of shares subject to 1999 Stock Option
Plan awards outstanding at May 18, 2005, that subsequently lapse or terminate without the
underlying shares being issued. The Director Plan was approved by stockholders in May 2004 and no
more than 450,000 shares of common stock may be issued under the Plan.
Stock options represent the right to purchase shares of stock in the future at the fair market
value of the stock on the date of grant. Most stock options granted under our stock option plans
vest over a three year period and expire five years from the date they are granted. Beginning in
2005, we began granting stock-settled stock appreciation rights
(SARs) to reduce the dilutive impact of our equity plans.
Similar to stock options, SARs represent the right to receive a
payment equal to the excess of the fair market value of shares of common stock on the date the
right is exercised over the value of the stock on the date of grant. All SARs granted under the
2005 Plan will be settled in shares of stock, vest over a three-year period and have a maximum term
of five years from the date they are granted.
The Compensation Committee grants restricted stock to certain employees and to non-employee
directors of the Board of Directors as part of their compensation. Compensation expense is
recognized over the balance of the vesting period, which is typically three years for employee
grants and immediate vesting for non-employee directors. All restricted shares that are granted
are placed in the deferred compensation plan. All vested restricted stock held in our deferred
compensation plan is marked-to-market each reporting period based on the market value of our stock.
This mark-to-market is presented in the caption Deferred
compensation plan in our statement of
operations. See additional information in Note 12.
The fair value of stock options and stock-settled SARs is estimated on the date of grant using
the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model. The model employs various assumptions, based on
managements best estimates at the time of
F- 12
the grant, which impact the fair value calculated and ultimately, the expense that is recognized
over the life of the award. The fair value of restricted stock awards is determined based on the
fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant.
Stock-based compensation represents amortization of restricted stock grants and stock
option/SARs expense recognized under SFAS No. 123(R). In 2006, stock-based compensation was
allocated to direct operating expense ($1.4 million), exploration expense ($2.5 million) and
general and administrative expense ($10.7 million) to align SFAS No. 123(R) expense with the
employees cash compensation. In 2007, stock-based compensation was allocated to direct
operating expense ($1.8 million), exploration expense ($2.3 million) and general and
administrative expense ($10.8 million). In 2008, stock-based compensation was allocated to
direct operating expense ($2.8 million), exploration expense ($4.1 million) and general and
administrative expense ($23.8 million) for a total of $31.2 million. We recognize stock-based
compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire
award. The expense we recognize is net of estimated forfeitures. We estimate our forfeiture
rate based on prior experience and adjust it as circumstances warrant. Unlike the other forms
of stock-based compensation mentioned above, the deferred compensation plan cost is directly tied to
the change in our stock price and not directly related to the functional expenses and
therefore, is not allocated to the functional categories.
Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging
We account for our derivative activities under the provisions of SFAS No. 133, Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended. The statement, as amended, establishes
accounting and reporting standards requiring that every derivative instrument be recorded on the
balance sheet as either an asset or a liability measured at its fair value. The statement requires
that changes in the derivatives fair value be recognized currently in earnings unless specific
hedge accounting criteria are met. All of the derivative instruments that we use are to manage the
price risk attributable to our expected oil and gas production. Cash flows from oil and gas
derivative contract settlements are reflected in operating activities in our statement of cash
flows.
Historically, we applied hedge accounting to qualifying derivatives used to manage price risk
associated with our oil and gas production. Accordingly, we recorded changes in the fair value of
our swap and collar contracts, including changes associated with time value, under the caption
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) on our consolidated balance sheet. Gains or losses
on these swap and collar contracts are reclassified out of Accumulated other comprehensive income
(loss) and into Oil and gas sales when the forecasted sale of production occurred. Any hedge
ineffectiveness associated with contracts qualifying for and designated as a cash flow hedge (which
represents the amount by which the change in the fair value of the derivative differs from the
change in the cash flows of the forecasted sale of production) is reported currently each period
under the caption Derivative fair value income (loss) in our consolidated statement of
operations.
To designate a derivative as a cash flow hedge, we document at the hedges inception our
assessment that the derivative will be highly effective in offsetting expected changes in cash
flows from the item hedged. This assessment, which is updated at least quarterly, is generally
based on the most recent relevant historical correlation between the derivative and the item
hedged. The ineffective portion of the hedge is calculated as the difference between the change in
fair value of the derivative and the estimated change in cash flows from the item hedged. If,
during the derivatives term, we determine the hedge is no longer highly effective, hedge
accounting is prospectively discontinued and any remaining unrealized gains or losses, based on the
effective portion of the derivative at that date, are reclassified to earnings as oil or gas
revenue when the underlying transaction occurs. If it is determined that the designated hedge
transaction is not probable to occur, any unrealized gains or losses are recognized immediately in
the statement of operations as a Derivative fair value income or loss. During 2008 and 2007,
there were losses of $2.3 million and $14.5 million reclassified into earnings as a result of the
discontinuance of hedge accounting treatment for our derivatives.
Some of our derivatives do not qualify for hedge accounting but are, to a degree, an economic
offset to our commodity price exposure. These contracts are accounted for using the mark-to-market
accounting method. We recognize all unrealized and realized gains and losses related to these
contracts in our consolidated statement of operations under the caption Derivative fair value
income (loss).
We also enter into basis swap agreements which do not qualify as hedges for hedge accounting
and are also marked to market. The price we receive for our gas production can be more or less
than the NYMEX price because of adjustments for delivery location (basis), relative quality and
other factors; therefore, we have entered into basis swap agreement that effectively fix our basis
adjustments.
F- 13
Asset Retirement Obligations
The fair values of asset retirement obligations are recognized in the period they are
incurred, if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. Asset retirement obligations
primarily relate to the abandonment of oil and gas producing facilities and include costs to
dismantle and relocate or dispose of production platforms, gathering systems, wells and related
structures. Estimates are based on historical experience in plugging and abandoning wells,
estimated remaining lives of those wells based on reserve estimates, external estimates as to the
cost to plug and abandon the wells in the future and federal and state regulatory requirements.
Depreciation of capitalized asset retirement costs and accretion of asset retirement obligations
are recorded over time. The depreciation will generally be determined on a units-of-production
basis while accretion to be recognized will escalate over the life of the producing assets. We do
not provide for a market risk premium associated with asset retirement obligations because a
reliable estimate cannot be determined.
Deferred Taxes
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences
attributable to the differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of assets and
liabilities and their tax bases as reported in our filings with the respective taxing authorities.
The realization of deferred tax assets is assessed periodically based on several interrelated
factors. These factors include our expectation to generate sufficient taxable income including tax
credits and operating loss carryforwards.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
We follow the provisions of SFAS No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive Income which establishes
standards for reporting comprehensive income. Comprehensive income includes net income as well as
all changes in equity during the period, except those resulting from investments and distributions
to owners. At December 31, 2008, we had a $122.3 million pre-tax gain in accumulated other
comprehensive income, or OCI, relating to unrealized commodity hedges. At December 31, 2007, we
had a $41.1 million pre-tax loss in OCI relating to unrealized commodity hedges.
The components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and related tax effects for
three years ended December 31, 2008, were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Tax Effect |
|
|
Net of Tax |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss at December 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
(234,363 |
) |
|
$ |
87,236 |
|
|
$ |
(147,127 |
) |
Contract settlements reclassified to income |
|
|
96,450 |
|
|
|
(35,686 |
) |
|
|
60,764 |
|
Change in unrealized deferred hedging gains |
|
|
192,183 |
|
|
|
(71,351 |
) |
|
|
120,832 |
|
Change in unrealized gains (losses) on
securities held by deferred compensation plan |
|
|
3,203 |
|
|
|
(1,151 |
) |
|
|
2,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income at December 31, 2006 |
|
|
57,473 |
|
|
|
(20,952 |
) |
|
|
36,521 |
|
Contract settlements reclassified to income |
|
|
(5,129 |
) |
|
|
1,898 |
|
|
|
(3,231 |
) |
Change in unrealized deferred hedging gains |
|
|
(87,228 |
) |
|
|
32,274 |
|
|
|
(54,954 |
) |
Change in unrealized gains (losses) on securities held by
deferred compensation plan |
|
|
(8,194 |
) |
|
|
3,033 |
|
|
|
(5,161 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
(43,078 |
) |
|
|
16,253 |
|
|
|
(26,825 |
) |
Contract settlements reclassified to income |
|
|
62,188 |
|
|
|
(23,631 |
) |
|
|
38,557 |
|
Change in unrealized deferred hedging gains |
|
|
101,120 |
|
|
|
(36,619 |
) |
|
|
64,501 |
|
Adoption of SFAS No. 159 |
|
|
2,022 |
|
|
|
(748 |
) |
|
|
1,274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income at December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
122,252 |
|
|
$ |
(44,745 |
) |
|
$ |
77,507 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications of prior years data have been made to conform to our current year
classification. This includes the reclassification of abandonment and impairment expense for
unproved properties from the line on statement of operations called
Depletion, depreciation and
amortization. These reclassifications did not impact our net income, stockholders equity or cash
flows.
F- 14
Accounting Pronouncements Implemented
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurement. This statement
defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted
accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 does not
require any new fair value measurements but provides guidance on how to measure fair value by
providing a fair value hierarchy used to classify the source of the information. We adopted SFAS
No. 157 effective January 1, 2008 for our financial instruments and the adoption did not have a
significant effect on our consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
See Note 11 for other disclosures required by SFAS No. 157. In February 2008, the FASB issued FSP
SFAS No. 157-2 which delays the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for all non-financial assets and
non-financial liabilities except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the
financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). This deferral of SFAS No. 157
primarily impacts our asset retirement obligation (ARO), which uses fair value measures at the date
incurred to determine our liability. We do not expect the pending adoption in 2009 of SFAS No. 157
non-recurring fair value measures to have a significant impact on our financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets
and Financial Liabilities. This statement permits entities to choose to measure many financial
instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not currently required to be measured at
fair value. It requires that unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option
has been elected be recorded in net income or loss. The statement also establishes presentation
and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparison between entities that choose
different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. We adopted SFAS No.
159 effective January 1, 2008 and the impact of the adoption resulted in a reclassification of a
$2.0 million pre-tax loss ($1.3 million after tax) related to our investment securities held in our
deferred compensation plan from accumulated other comprehensive loss to retained earnings. We
elected to adopt the fair value option to simplify our accounting for the investments in our
deferred compensation plan. All investment securities held in our deferred compensation plans are
reported in the balance sheet category called Other assets and total $33.5 million at December 31,
2008 compared to $51.5 million at December 31, 2007. As of January 1, 2008, all of these
investment securities are accounted for using the mark-to-market accounting method, are classified
as trading securities and all subsequent changes to fair value will be included in our statement of
operations. For these securities, interest and dividends and mark-to-market gains or losses are
included in our statement of operations category called Deferred compensation plan expense. For
2008, interest and dividends were $1.5 million and the mark-to-market was a loss of $19.4 million.
See Note 11 for other disclosures required by SFAS No. 159.
Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
In June 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position No. EITF 03-6-1 Determining Whether Instruments
Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions are Participating Securities, (FSP EITF 03-6-1)
which provides that unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to
dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and,
therefore, need to be included in the earnings allocation in computing earnings per share under the
two class method. FSP EITF 03-6-1 is effective for us on January 1, 2009 and all prior-period EPS
data (including any amounts related to interim periods, summaries of earnings and selected
financial data) will be adjusted retroactively to conform to its provisions. Early application of
FSP EITF 03-6-1 is not permitted. Although restricted stock awards meet this definition, we do not
expect the application of FSP 03-6-1 to have a significant impact on our reported earnings per
share.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosure about Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133. SFAS No. 161 amends and expands the
disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 133 with the intent to provide users of financial statements
with an enhanced understanding of: (i) how and why any entity uses derivative instruments; (ii)
how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS No. 133 and its
related interpretations; and (iii) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an
entitys financial position, financial performance and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 is effective for
us on January 1, 2009 and will only impact future disclosures about our derivative instruments and
hedging activities.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), Business Combinations. SFAS No. 141(R)
replaces SFAS No. 141. The statement retains the purchase method of accounting for acquisitions,
but requires a number of changes, including changes in the way assets and liabilities are
recognized in the purchase method of accounting. It changes the recognition of assets acquired and
liabilities assumed arising from contingencies, requires the capitalization of in-process research
and development at fair value, and requires the expensing of acquisition-related costs as incurred.
The statement will apply prospectively to business combinations occurring in our fiscal year
beginning January 1, 2009. The effect of adopting SFAS No. 141(R) is not expected to have an
effect on our reported financial position or earnings.
F - 15
(3) ACQUISITIONS AND DISPOSITIONS
Acquisitions
Acquisitions are accounted for as purchases, and accordingly, the results of operations are
included in our statement of operations from the closing date of the acquisition. Purchase prices
are allocated to acquired assets and assumed liabilities based on their estimated fair value at the
time of the acquisition. In the past, acquisitions have been funded with internal cash flow, bank
borrowings and the issuance of debt and equity securities.
In 2008, we completed several acquisitions of Barnett Shale producing and unproved properties
for $331.2 million. After recording asset retirement obligations and transactions costs of
$827,000, the purchase price allocated to proved properties was $232.9 million and unproved
properties was $99.4 million. Also during 2008, we purchased unproved leaseholds for $494.3
million, which includes a single transaction to acquire Marcellus Shale unproved properties for
$223.9 million.
In May 2007, we acquired additional interests in the Nora field of Virginia and entered into a
joint development plan with Equitable Resources, Inc. (Equitable). As a result of this
transaction, Equitable and Range equalized their working interests in the Nora field, including
producing wells, undrilled acreage and gathering systems. Range retained its separately owned
royalty interest in the Nora field. Equitable will operate the producing wells and manage the
drilling operations of all future coal bed methane wells and the gathering system. Range will
oversee the drilling of formations below the coal bed methane formations, including tight gas,
shale and deeper formations. A newly formed limited liability corporation will hold the investment
in the gathering system which is owned 50% by Equitable and 50% by Range. All business decisions
require the unanimous consent of both parties. The gathering system investment is accounted for as
an equity method investment. Including estimated transaction costs, we paid $281.8 million which
includes $190.2 million allocated to oil and gas properties, $94.7 million allocated to our equity
method investment and a $3.1 million asset retirement obligation. In December 2007, we paid an
additional $7.1 million for additional interests in the same field. No pro forma information has
been provided as the acquisition was not considered significant.
Our purchases in 2006 included the acquisition in June of Stroud Energy, Inc. (Stroud), a
private oil and gas company with operations in the Barnett Shale in North Texas, the Cotton Valley
in East Texas and the Austin Chalk in Central Texas. To acquire Stroud, we paid $171.5 million of
cash (including transaction costs) and issued 6.5 million shares of our common stock. The cash
portion of the acquisition was funded with borrowings under our bank facility. We also assumed
$106.7 million of Strouds debt which was retired with borrowings under our bank facility. The
fair value of consideration issued was based on the average of our stock price for the five day
period before and after May 11, 2006, the date the acquisition was announced. See also Note 4 for
discussion of discontinued operations.
The following table summarizes the final purchase price allocation of fair value of assets
acquired and liabilities assumed at closing (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase price: |
|
|
|
|
Cash paid (including transaction costs) |
|
$ |
171,529 |
|
6.5 million shares of common stock (at fair value of $27.26
per share) |
|
|
177,641 |
|
Stock options assumed (652,000 options) |
|
|
9,478 |
|
Debt retired |
|
|
106,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
465,348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation of purchase price: |
|
|
|
|
Working capital deficit |
|
$ |
(13,557 |
) |
Other long-term assets |
|
|
55 |
|
Oil and gas properties |
|
|
487,345 |
|
Assets held for sale |
|
|
140,000 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(147,062 |
) |
Asset retirement obligations |
|
|
(1,433 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
465,348 |
|
|
|
|
|
F - 16
Pro forma
The following unaudited pro forma data include the results of operations as if the Stroud
acquisition had been consummated at the beginning of 2006. The pro forma data is based on
historical information and does not necessarily reflect the actual results that would have occurred
nor are they necessarily indicative of future results of operations (in thousands, except per share
data).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
Revenues |
|
$ |
779,487 |
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
315,220 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
161,998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share data: |
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations-basic |
|
$ |
1.41 |
|
Income from continuing operations-diluted |
|
$ |
1.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income basic |
|
$ |
1.18 |
|
Net income diluted |
|
$ |
1.14 |
|
Dispositions
In the first quarter of 2008, we sold East Texas properties for proceeds of $64.0 million and
recorded a gain of $20.2 million. In February 2007, we sold the Stroud Austin Chalk properties for
proceeds of $80.4 million and recorded a loss on the sale of $2.3 million. These properties were
acquired in 2006 as part of our Stroud acquisition and were classified as assets held for sale on
the acquisition date. In March 2007, we sold our Gulf of Mexico properties for proceeds of $155.0
million and recorded a gain on the sale of $95.1 million. We have reflected the results of
operations of the Austin Chalk and Gulf of Mexico divestitures as discontinued operations rather
than a component of continuing operations for 2007 and all prior years. See Note 4 for additional
information.
(4) DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
As part of the Stroud acquisition (see also discussion in Note 3), we purchased Austin Chalk
properties in Central Texas, which were sold in February 2007 for proceeds of $80.4 million. We
originally allocated $140.0 million to these properties as part of the purchase price allocation.
However, after the acquisition, natural gas prices started to decline. As a result, during 2006 we
recognized impairment expense of $74.9 million. In March 2007, we also sold our Gulf of Mexico
properties for proceeds of $155.0 million. All prior year periods reflect our Gulf of Mexico
operations and the Austin Chalk properties as discontinued operations. Discontinued operations for
the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 are summarized as follows (in thousands):
F - 17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and gas sales (a) |
|
$ |
15,187 |
|
|
$ |
54,192 |
|
Transportation and gathering |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
Other |
|
|
310 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
Gain on disposition of assets |
|
|
92,757 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
108,264 |
|
|
|
54,258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct operating |
|
|
2,559 |
|
|
|
12,201 |
|
Production and ad valorem taxes |
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
1,065 |
|
Exploration and other |
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
2,400 |
|
Interest expense (b) |
|
|
845 |
|
|
|
3,232 |
|
Depletion, depreciation and amortization |
|
|
6,672 |
|
|
|
14,953 |
|
Impairment (c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
74,910 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
10,432 |
|
|
|
108,761 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations before income taxes |
|
|
97,832 |
|
|
|
(54,503 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
34,239 |
|
|
|
(19,256 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes |
|
$ |
63,593 |
|
|
$ |
(35,247 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude oil (bbls) |
|
|
40,634 |
|
|
|
139,189 |
|
Natural gas (mcf) |
|
|
1,990,277 |
|
|
|
7,927,557 |
|
Total (mcfe) (d) |
|
|
2,234,081 |
|
|
|
8,762,691 |
|
|
|
|
a) |
|
Realized hedging gains and losses for the Gulf of Mexico properties have been
allocated to discontinued operations based on the designated hedge values for those assets. |
|
b) |
|
Interest expense is allocated to discontinued operations for our Austin Chalk
properties based on the debt incurred at the time of the acquisition and for the Gulf of
Mexico properties, interest expense was allocated based upon the ratio of the Gulf of Mexico
properties to our total oil and gas properties at December 31, 2006. |
|
c) |
|
Impairment expenses for the Austin Chalk properties includes losses in fair value
resulting from lower oil and gas prices and amortization of the carrying value for volumes
produced since the acquisition date. |
|
d) |
|
Oil is converted to mcfe at the rate of one barrel equals six mcf. |
(5) INCOME TAXES
Our income tax expense from continuing operations was $196.4 million for the year ended
December 31, 2008 compared to $98.8 million in 2007 and $121.8 million in 2006. A reconciliation
between the statutory federal income tax rate and our effective income tax rate is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Federal statutory tax rate |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
State |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
Valuation allowance |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated effective tax rate |
|
|
36.2 |
% |
|
|
37.2 |
% |
|
|
38.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes paid (refunded) (in thousands) |
|
$ |
4,298 |
|
|
$ |
(572 |
) |
|
$ |
1,973 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F - 18
Income tax provision (benefit) attributable to income from continuing operations consists of
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Current: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. federal |
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
$ |
(129 |
) |
|
$ |
150 |
|
U.S. state and local |
|
|
3,268 |
|
|
|
449 |
|
|
|
1,762 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,268 |
|
|
$ |
320 |
|
|
$ |
1,912 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. federal |
|
$ |
187,532 |
|
|
$ |
94,310 |
|
|
$ |
110,296 |
|
U.S. state and local |
|
|
4,636 |
|
|
|
4,131 |
|
|
|
9,544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
192,168 |
|
|
$ |
98,441 |
|
|
$ |
119,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total tax provision |
|
$ |
196,436 |
|
|
$ |
98,761 |
|
|
$ |
121,752 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant components of deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Deferred tax assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current net unrealized loss in OCI |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,195 |
|
Deferred compensation |
|
|
1,289 |
|
|
|
3,981 |
|
Current portion of asset retirement obligation |
|
|
767 |
|
|
|
704 |
|
Other |
|
|
4,411 |
|
|
|
2,967 |
|
Current portion of net operating loss carryforward |
|
|
4,258 |
|
|
|
14,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
10,725 |
|
|
|
26,907 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss carryforward |
|
|
21,033 |
|
|
|
34,476 |
|
Net unrealized loss in OCI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,060 |
|
Deferred compensation |
|
|
41,114 |
|
|
|
41,255 |
|
AMT credits and other credits |
|
|
7,106 |
|
|
|
4,546 |
|
Non-current portion of asset retirement obligation |
|
|
30,168 |
|
|
|
27,302 |
|
Other |
|
|
12,602 |
|
|
|
9,046 |
|
Valuation allowance |
|
|
(4,147 |
) |
|
|
(3,101 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
107,876 |
|
|
|
124,584 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gain in OCI |
|
|
(43,709 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
(43,709 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and investments |
|
|
(851,803 |
) |
|
|
(707,111 |
) |
Net unrealized gain in OCI |
|
|
(1,036 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Cumulative unrealized mark-to-market gain |
|
|
(38,055 |
) |
|
|
(6,812 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(373 |
) |
|
|
(1,447 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
(891,267 |
) |
|
|
(715,370 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liability |
|
$ |
(816,375 |
) |
|
$ |
(563,879 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F - 19
At December 31, 2008, deferred tax liabilities exceeded deferred tax assets by $816.4 million,
with $44.7 million of deferred tax liability related to net deferred hedging gains included in OCI.
We have a capital loss carryforward of $8.3 million and a full valuation allowance recorded of
$2.9 million. Also in 2008, a valuation allowance of $1.2 million was recorded against the
deferred tax asset related to our deferred compensation plan for planned future distributions to
top level executives to the extent that their estimated future compensation plus distribution
amounts would exceed the $1.0 million deductible limit provided under I.R.C. Section 162(m).
At December 31, 2008, we had regular net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards of $158.7
million and alternative minimum tax (AMT) NOL carryforwards of $90.8 million that expire between
2012 and 2027. Our deferred tax asset related to regular NOL carryforwards at December 31, 2008
was $10.2 million, which is net of the SFAS No. 123(R) reduction for unrealized benefits. Regular
NOLs generally offset taxable income and to such extent, no income tax payments are required. At
December 31, 2008, we have AMT credit carryforwards of $1.8 million that are not subject to
limitation or expiration.
We file consolidated tax returns in the United States federal jurisdiction and separate income
tax returns in many state jurisdictions. We are subject to U.S. Federal income tax examinations
for the years after 2002 and we are subject to various state tax examinations for years after 2001.
Our continuing policy is to recognize interest related to income tax expense in interest expense
and penalties in general and administrative expense. We do not have any accrued interest or
penalties related to tax amounts as of December 31, 2008. Throughout 2008, our unrecognized tax
benefits were not material.
(6) EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share
(in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
346,158 |
|
|
$ |
166,976 |
|
|
$ |
193,949 |
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,593 |
|
|
|
(35,247 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
346,158 |
|
|
$ |
230,569 |
|
|
$ |
158,702 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares, basic |
|
|
151,116 |
|
|
|
143,791 |
|
|
|
133,751 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee stock options, SARs and stock held in deferred
compensation plan |
|
|
4,876 |
|
|
|
6,178 |
|
|
|
4,961 |
|
Treasury shares |
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares diluted |
|
|
155,943 |
|
|
|
149,911 |
|
|
|
138,711 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
2.29 |
|
|
$ |
1.16 |
|
|
$ |
1.45 |
|
discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.44 |
|
|
|
(0.26 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
net income |
|
$ |
2.29 |
|
|
$ |
$1.60 |
|
|
$ |
1.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
2.22 |
|
|
$ |
1.11 |
|
|
$ |
1.39 |
|
discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.43 |
|
|
|
(0.25 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
net income |
|
$ |
2.22 |
|
|
$ |
1.54 |
|
|
$ |
1.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F - 20
For December 31, 2008, stock appreciation rights for 880,000 shares were outstanding but not
included in the computations of diluted earnings per share, because the grant price of the SARs was
greater than the average price of the common stock and would be anti-dilutive to the computations
(345,000 shares for the year ended December 31, 2007 and 88,500 shares for the year ended December
31, 2006).
(7) SUSPENDED EXPLORATORY WELL COSTS
The following table reflects the changes in capitalized exploratory well costs for the year
ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
15,053 |
|
|
$ |
9,984 |
|
|
$ |
25,340 |
|
Additions to capitalized exploratory well costs pending the
determination of proved reserves |
|
|
43,968 |
|
|
|
14,428 |
|
|
|
4,695 |
|
Divested wells |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,325 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Reclassifications to wells, facilities and equipment based
on determination of proved reserves |
|
|
(3,847 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,710 |
) |
Capitalized exploratory well costs charged to expense |
|
|
(7,551 |
) |
|
|
(8,034 |
) |
|
|
(3,341 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
|
47,623 |
|
|
|
15,053 |
|
|
|
9,984 |
|
Less exploratory well costs that have been capitalized for
a period of one year or less |
|
|
(41,681 |
) |
|
|
(12,067 |
) |
|
|
(4,792 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalized exploratory well costs that have been capitalized for
a period greater than one year |
|
$ |
5,942 |
|
|
$ |
2,986 |
|
|
$ |
5,192 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of projects that have exploratory well costs that have
been capitalized for a period greater than one year |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008, the $5.9 million of capitalized exploratory well costs that have been
capitalized for more than one year relates to wells waiting on pipelines. Of the $47.6 million of
capitalized exploratory well costs at December 31, 2008, $41.7 million was incurred in 2008 and
$5.9 million in 2007.
(8) INDEBTEDNESS
We had the following debt outstanding as of the dates shown below (bank debt interest rate at
December 31, 2008 is shown parenthetically). No interest was capitalized during 2008, 2007, and
2006 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Bank debt (2.9%) |
|
$ |
693,000 |
|
|
$ |
303,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior subordinated notes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.375% senior subordinated notes due 2013, net
of $2.0 million and $2.4 million discount, respectively |
|
|
197,968 |
|
|
|
197,602 |
|
6.375% senior subordinated notes due 2015 |
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
7.5% senior subordinated notes due 2016, net of $405,000 and $444,000
discount, respectively |
|
|
249,595 |
|
|
|
249,556 |
|
7.5% senior subordinated notes due 2017 |
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
7.25% senior subordinated notes due 2018 |
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt |
|
$ |
1,790,668 |
|
|
$ |
1,150,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F - 21
Bank Debt
In October 2006, we entered into an amended and restated revolving bank facility, which we
refer to as our bank debt or our bank credit facility, which is secured by substantially all of our
assets. The bank credit facility provides for an initial commitment equal to the lesser of the
facility amount or the borrowing base. On December 31, 2008, the facility amount was $1.25 billion
and the borrowing base was $1.5 billion. The bank credit facility provides for a borrowing base
subject to redeterminations semi-annually each April and October and
for event-driven unscheduled
redeterminations. Our current bank group is comprised of twenty-six commercial banks each holding
between 2.3% and 5.0% of the total facility. Of those twenty-six banks, fourteen are domestic
banks and twelve are foreign banks or wholly-owned subsidiaries of foreign banks. The facility
amount may be increased to the borrowing base amount with twenty days notice, subject to payment of
a mutually acceptable commitment fee to those banks agreeing to participate in the facility
increase. In December 2008, we elected to utilize the expansion option under our bank credit
facility and increased our credit facility commitment by $250.0 million, which made the current
bank commitment $1.25 billion. As of December 31, 2008, the outstanding balance under the bank
credit facility was $693.0 million and there was $557.0 million of borrowing capacity available
under the facility amount. The loan matures on October 25, 2012. Borrowings under the bank
facility can either be at the Alternate Base Rate (as defined) plus a spread ranging from 0.875% to
1.625% or LIBOR borrowings at the Adjusted LIBO Rate (as defined) plus a spread ranging from 1.75%
to 2.5%. The applicable spread is dependent upon borrowings relative to the borrowing base. We
may elect, from time to time, to convert all or any part of our LIBOR loans to base rate loans or
to convert all or any of the base rate loans to LIBOR loans. The weighted average interest rate
was 4.4% for the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to 6.4% for the year ended December 31,
2007. A commitment fee is paid on the undrawn balance based on an annual rate of 0.375% to 0.50%.
At December 31, 2008, the commitment fee was 0.375% and the interest rate margin was 1.75%.
Senior Subordinated Notes
In 2003, we issued $100.0 million aggregate principal amount of 7.375% senior subordinated
notes due 2013 (7.375% Notes). In 2004, we issued an additional $100.0 million of 7.375% Notes;
therefore, $200.0 million of the 7.375% Notes is currently outstanding. The 7.375% Notes were
issued at a discount which will be amortized over the life of the 7.375% Notes into interest
expense. In 2005, we issued $150.0 million aggregate principal amount of 6.375% senior
subordinated notes due 2015 (6.375% Notes). In May 2006, we issued $150.0 million aggregate
principal amount of the 7.5% senior subordinated notes due 2016 (the 7.5% Notes due 2016). In
August 2006, we issued an additional $100.0 million of the 7.5% Notes due 2016; therefore, $250.0
million of the 7.5% Notes due 2016 is currently outstanding. The 7.5% Notes due 2016 were also
issued at a discount, which is being amortized over the life of the 7.5% Notes due 2016. In
September 2007, we issued $250.0 million principal amount of 7.5% senior subordinated notes due
2017 (7.5% Notes due 2017). In May 2008, we issued $250.0 million aggregate principal amount of
7.25% senior subordinated notes due 2018 (7.25% Notes). Interest on our senior subordinated
notes is payable semi-annually, at varying times, and each of the notes is guaranteed by certain of
our subsidiaries.
We may redeem the 7.375% Notes, in whole or in part, at any time on or after July 15, 2008, at
redemption prices of 103.7% of the principal amount as of July 15, 2008, and declining to 100.0% on
July 15, 2011 and thereafter. We may redeem the 6.375% Notes, in whole or in part, at any time on
or after March 15, 2010, at redemption prices from 103.2% of the principal amount as of March 15,
2010 and declining to 100% on March 15, 2013 and thereafter. We may redeem the 7.5% Notes due
2016, in whole or in part, at any time on or after May 15, 2011 at redemption prices from 103.75%
of the principal amount as of May 15, 2011 and declining to 100% on May 15, 2014 and thereafter.
Before May 15, 2009, we may redeem up to 35% of the original aggregate principal amount of the 7.5%
Notes due 2016 at a redemption price of 107.5% of principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid
interest if any, with the proceeds of certain equity offerings; provided that at least 65% of the
original aggregate principal amount of our 7.5% Notes 2016 remains outstanding immediately after
the occurrence of such redemption and provided that such redemption occurs within 60 days of the
date of closing the equity sale. We may redeem the 7.5% Notes due 2017, in whole or in part, at
any time on or after October 1, 2012 at redemption prices ranging from 103.75% of the principal
amount as of October 1, 2012 and declining to 100% on October 1, 2015 and thereafter. Before
October 1, 2010, we may redeem up to 35% of the original aggregate principal amount of the 7.5%
Notes due 2017 at a redemption price of 107.5% of principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid
interest, if any, with the proceeds of certain equity offerings provided that at least 65% of the
original aggregate principal amount of our 7.5% Notes due 2017 remains outstanding immediately
after the occurrence of such redemption and provided that such redemption occurs 60 days of the
date of closing the equity sale. We may redeem the 7.25% Notes, in whole or in part, at any time
on or after May 1, 2016 at redemption prices of 103.625% of the principal amount as of May 1, 2013
and declining to 100.0% on May 1, 2016 and
thereafter. Before May 1, 2011, we may redeem up to 35% of the original aggregate principal amount
of the 7.25% Notes at a redemption price equal to 107.25% of the principal amount
thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, with the proceeds of certain equity
offerings provided that at least 65% of the original principal amount of the 7.25% Notes
remain outstanding immediately after the occurrence of such redemption and also
provided such redemption shall occur within 60 days of the date of the closing of the equity
offering.
F - 22
If
we experience a change of control, there will be a requirement to repurchase all or a
portion of the senior subordinated notes at 101% of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid
interest, if any. All of the senior subordinated notes and the guarantees by our subsidiary
guarantors are general, unsecured obligations and are subordinated to our bank debt and will be
subordinated to future senior debt that we or our subsidiary guarantors are permitted to incur
under the bank credit facility and the indentures governing the subordinated notes.
Guarantees
Range Resources Corporation is a holding company which owns no operating assets and has no
significant operations independent of its subsidiaries. The
guarantees by our subsidiaries of the 7.375%
Notes, the 6.375% Notes, the 7.5% Notes due 2016, the 7.5% Notes due 2017 and the 7.25% Notes are
full and unconditional and joint and several; any subsidiaries other than the subsidiary guarantors
are minor subsidiaries.
Debt Covenants and Maturity
Our bank credit facility contains negative covenants that limit our ability, among other
things, to pay cash dividends, incur additional indebtedness, sell assets, enter into certain
hedging contracts, change the nature of our business or operations, merge, consolidate, or make
investments. In addition, we are required to maintain a ratio of debt to EBITDAX (as defined in
the credit agreement) of no greater than 4.0 to 1.0 and a current ratio (as defined in the credit
agreement) of no less than 1.0 to 1.0. We were in compliance with our covenants under the bank
credit facility at December 31, 2008.
Following is the principal maturity schedule for the long-term debt outstanding as of December
31, 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
2009 |
|
$ |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
2012 |
|
|
693,022 |
|
2013 |
|
|
198,050 |
|
2014 |
|
|
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
899,596 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,790,668 |
|
|
|
|
|
The indentures governing our senior subordinated notes contain various restrictive covenants
that are substantially identical and may limit our ability to, among other things, pay cash
dividends, incur additional indebtedness, sell assets, enter into transactions with affiliates, or
change the nature of our business. At December 31, 2008, we were in compliance with these
covenants.
F - 23
(9) ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATION
Our asset retirement obligation primarily represents the estimated present value of the amount
we will incur to plug, abandon and remediate our producing properties at the end of their
productive lives. A reconciliation of our liability for plugging and abandonment costs for the
years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Beginning of period |
|
$ |
75,308 |
|
|
$ |
95,588 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities incurred |
|
|
2,347 |
|
|
|
3,118 |
|
Acquisitions continuing operations |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
3,301 |
|
Liabilities settled |
|
|
(1,399 |
) |
|
|
(2,782 |
) |
Disposition of wells |
|
|
(898 |
) |
|
|
(20,066 |
) |
Accretion expense continuing operations |
|
|
5,471 |
|
|
|
5,960 |
|
Accretion expense discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
382 |
|
Change in estimate |
|
|
2,378 |
|
|
|
(10,193 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period |
|
|
83,457 |
|
|
|
75,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less current portion |
|
|
(2,055 |
) |
|
|
(1,903 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term asset retirement obligation |
|
$ |
81,402 |
|
|
$ |
73,405 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion
expense is recognized as a component of depreciation, depletion and
amortization on our statement of operations.
(10) CAPITAL STOCK
In May 2008, at our annual meeting, our shareholders approved an increase to our number of
authorized shares of common stock. We now have authorized capital stock of 485.0 million shares
which includes 475.0 million shares of common stock and 10.0 million shares of preferred stock.
The following is a schedule of changes in the number of common shares outstanding since the
beginning of 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Beginning balance |
|
|
149,511,997 |
|
|
|
138,931,565 |
|
Public offerings |
|
|
4,435,300 |
|
|
|
8,050,000 |
|
Shares issued in lieu of bonuses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,483 |
|
Stock options/SARs exercised |
|
|
1,339,536 |
|
|
|
2,220,627 |
|
Restricted stock grants |
|
|
167,054 |
|
|
|
408,067 |
|
Shares contributed to 401(k) plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,755 |
|
Treasury shares |
|
|
(78,400 |
) |
|
|
(155,500 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
|
155,375,487 |
|
|
|
149,511,997 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In May 2008, we completed a public offering of 4.4 million shares of common stock at $66.38
per share. After underwriting discount and other offering costs of $12.3 million, net proceeds of
$282.2 million were used to repay indebtedness on our bank credit facility. In April 2007, we
completed a public offering of 8.1 million shares of common stock at $36.28 per share. Total
proceeds from the offering of $280.4 million funded our
acquisition of properties and a gathering system in Virginia.
Treasury Stock
In 2008, the Board of Directors approved up to $10.0 million of repurchases of common stock
based on market conditions and opportunities. During 2008, we repurchased 78,400 shares of common
stock an average price of $41.11 for a total of $3.2 million. As of December 31, 2008, we have
$6.8 million remaining authorization to repurchase shares.
F - 24
(11) FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Financial instruments include cash and equivalents, receivables, payables, marketable
securities, debt and commodity derivatives. The carrying value of cash and equivalents,
receivables, payables is considered to be representative of fair value because of their short
maturity.
The following table sets forth our other financial instruments fair values at each of
these dates (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
Book |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Book |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Value |
|
Derivative assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity swaps and collars (a) |
|
$ |
226,661 |
|
|
$ |
226,661 |
|
|
$ |
54,100 |
|
|
$ |
54,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity swaps and collars (a) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(76,276 |
) |
|
|
(76,276 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net derivative asset (liability) |
|
$ |
226,651 |
|
|
$ |
226,651 |
|
|
$ |
(22,176 |
) |
|
$ |
(22,176 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable securities (b) |
|
$ |
33,473 |
|
|
$ |
33,473 |
|
|
$ |
51,482 |
|
|
$ |
51,482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt (c) |
|
$ |
1,790,668 |
|
|
$ |
1,621,793 |
|
|
$ |
1,150,658 |
|
|
$ |
1,158,033 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
All derivatives are marked to market and therefore their book value is equal to
fair value. |
|
(b) |
|
Marketable securities held in our deferred compensation plans which are marked
to market and therefore their book value is equal to fair value. |
|
(c) |
|
The book value of our bank debt approximates fair value because of its floating
rate structure. The fair value of our senior subordinated notes is based on year-end
market quotes. |
Commodity Derivative Instruments
We use commodity-based derivative contracts to manage exposures to commodity price
fluctuations. We do not enter into these arrangements for speculative or trading purposes. These
contracts consist of collars and fixed price swaps. We do not utilize complex derivatives such as
swaptions, knockouts or extendable swaps. At December 31, 2008, we had open swap contracts
covering 25.6 Bcf of gas at prices averaging $8.38 per mcf. We also had collars covering 54.8 Bcf
of gas at weighted average floor and cap prices of $8.28 to $9.27 per mcf and 2.9 million barrels
of oil at weighted average floor and cap prices of $64.01 to $76.00 per barrel. Their fair value,
represented by the estimated amount that would be realized upon termination, based on a comparison
of the contract price and a reference price, generally NYMEX, approximated a net unrealized pre-tax
gain of $214.2 million at December 31, 2008. These contracts expire monthly through December 2009.
The following table sets forth the derivative volumes by year as of December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
Period |
|
Contract Type |
|
Volume Hedged |
|
Average Hedge Price |
Natural Gas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Swaps
|
|
70,000 Mmbtu/day
|
|
$8.38 |
2009
|
|
Collars
|
|
150,000 Mmbtu/day
|
|
$8.28 $9.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude Oil |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Collars
|
|
8,000 bbl/day
|
|
$64.01 $76.00 |
F - 25
Under SFAS No. 133, every derivative instrument is required to be recorded on the balance
sheet as either an asset or a liability measured at its fair value. Fair value is generally
determined based on the difference between the fixed contract price and the underlying market price
at the determination date. Changes in the fair value of effective cash flow hedges are recorded as
a component of Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), which is later transferred to
earnings when the hedged transaction occurs. If the derivative does not qualify as a hedge or is
not designated as a hedge, the change in fair value of the derivative is recognized in earnings.
As of December 31, 2008, an unrealized pre-tax derivative gain of $122.2 million was recorded in
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). This gain will be reclassified into earnings in
2009 as the contracts settle. The actual reclassification to earnings will be based on
mark-to-market prices at the contract settlement date.
For those derivative instruments that qualify for hedge accounting, settled transaction gains
and losses are determined monthly, and are included as increases or decreases to Oil and gas
sales in the period the hedged production is sold. Oil and gas sales include $63.6 million of
losses in 2008 compared to gains of $4.2 million in 2007 and losses of $93.2 million in 2006. Any
ineffectiveness associated with these hedges is reflected in the caption called Derivative fair
value income (loss) in our statement of operations. The year ended December 31, 2008 includes
ineffective unrealized gains of $1.7 million compared to losses of $820,000 in 2007 and gains of
$6.0 million in 2006.
Some of our derivatives do not qualify for hedge accounting but are, to a degree, an economic
offset to our commodity price exposure. These contracts are accounted for using the mark-to-market
accounting method. We recognize all unrealized and realized gains and losses related to these
contracts in the income statement caption called Derivative fair value income (loss) (see table
below).
In addition to the swaps and collars above, we have entered into basis swap agreements which
do not qualify for hedge accounting and are marked to market. The price we receive for our gas
production can be more or less than the NYMEX price because of adjustments for delivery location,
relative quality and other factors; therefore, we have entered into basis swap agreements that
effectively fix our basis adjustments. The fair value of the basis swaps was a net unrealized
pre-tax gain of $12.4 million at December 31, 2008.
Derivative fair value income (loss)
The following table presents information about the components of derivative fair value income
(loss) in the three-year period ended December 31, 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Change in fair value of derivatives that do not
qualify for hedge accounting |
|
$ |
83,867 |
|
|
$ |
(78,769 |
) |
|
$ |
86,491 |
|
Realized (loss) gain on settlement-gas (a) |
|
|
(1,383 |
) |
|
|
71,098 |
|
|
|
49,939 |
|
Realized loss on settlement-oil (a) |
|
|
(15,431 |
) |
|
|
(244 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Hedge ineffectiveness realized |
|
|
1,386 |
|
|
|
968 |
|
|
|
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
1,696 |
|
|
|
(820 |
) |
|
|
5,965 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative fair value income (loss) |
|
$ |
70,135 |
|
|
$ |
(7,767 |
) |
|
$ |
142,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
These amounts represent the realized gains and losses on settled derivatives that
do not qualify for hedge accounting, which before settlement are included in the category
above called the change in fair value of derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting. |
F - 26
The combined fair value of derivatives included in our consolidated balance sheets as of
December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 is summarized below (in thousands). We conduct derivative
activities with twelve financial institutions, ten of which are secured lenders in our bank credit
facility. We believe all of these institutions are acceptable credit risks. At times, such risks
may be concentrated with certain counterparties. The credit worthiness of our counterparties is
subject to periodic review. The assets and liabilities are netted where derivatives with both gain
and loss positions are held by a single counterparty.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Derivative assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas swaps |
|
$ |
57,280 |
|
|
$ |
54,577 |
|
collars |
|
|
121,781 |
|
|
|
4,916 |
|
basis swaps |
|
|
12,434 |
|
|
|
1,082 |
|
Crude oil collars |
|
|
35,166 |
|
|
|
(6,475 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
226,661 |
|
|
$ |
54,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas swaps |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6,594 |
|
collars |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,302 |
|
basis swap |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(937 |
) |
Crude oil collars |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(93,235 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(10 |
) |
|
$ |
(76,276 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements
Effective January 1, 2008, we adopted SFAS No. 157, as discussed in Note 2, which among other
things, requires enhanced disclosures about assets and liabilities carried at fair value. As
defined in SFAS No. 157, fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to
transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
SFAS No. 157 describes three approaches to measuring the fair value of assets and liabilities:
the market approach, the income approach and the cost approach, each of which include multiple
valuation techniques. The market approach uses prices and other relevant information generated by
market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities. The income approach
uses valuation techniques to measure fair value by converting future amounts, such as cash flows or
earnings, into a single present value amount using current market expectations about those future
amounts. The cost approach is based on the amount that would currently be required to replace the
service capacity of an asset.
SFAS No. 157 does not prescribe which valuation technique should be used when measuring fair
value and does not prioritize among techniques. SFAS No. 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy
that prioritizes the inputs used in applying the various valuation techniques. Inputs broadly
refer to the assumptions that market participants use to make pricing decisions, including
assumptions about risk. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in
active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1 measurement) and lowest priority to
unobservable inputs (level 3 measurements). The three levels of fair value hierarchy defined by
SFAS No. 157 are as follows:
Level 1 Inputs are unadjusted, quoted prices in active markets for
identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.
Level 2 Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets
included in either Level 1, which are directly or indirectly observable as of
the reporting date. Level 2 includes those financial instruments that are
valued using models or other valuation methodologies. These models are
primarily industry-standard models that consider various assumptions,
including quoted forward prices for commodities, time value, volatility
factors, and current market and contractual prices for the underlying
instruments, as well as other relevant economic measures. Our derivatives,
which consist primarily of commodity swaps and collars, are valued using
commodity market data, which is derived by combining raw inputs and
quantitative models and processes to generate forward curves. Where
observable inputs are available, directly or indirectly, for substantially
the full term of the asset or liability, the instrument is categorized in
Level 2.
F - 27
Level 3 Pricing inputs include significant inputs that are generally
less observable from objective sources. These inputs may be used with
internally developed methodologies that result in managements best estimate
of fair value. At December 31, 2008, we have no Level 3 measurements.
We use a market approach for our fair value measurements and endeavor to use the best
information available. Accordingly, valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable
impacts are favored. The following table presents the fair value hierarchy table for assets and
liabilities measured at fair value, on a recurring basis, as set
forth in SFAS No. 157 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2008 Using |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Active |
|
|
|
|
|
Significant |
|
|
Total Carrying |
|
Markets for |
|
Significant |
|
Unobservable |
|
|
Value as of |
|
Identical Assets |
|
Observable Inputs |
|
Inputs |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
(Level 1) |
|
(Level 2) |
|
(Level 3) |
Trading securities held in the
deferred compensation plans |
|
$ |
33,473 |
|
|
$ |
33,473 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives swaps |
|
|
57,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
collars |
|
|
156,947 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
156,947 |
|
|
|
|
|
basis swaps |
|
|
12,424 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,424 |
|
|
|
|
|
These items are classified in their entirety based on the lowest priority level of input that
is significant to the fair value measurement. The assessment of the significance of a particular
input to the fair value measurement requires judgment and may affect the placement of assets and
liabilities within the levels of the fair value hierarchy. Our trading securities in Level 1 are
exchange-traded and measured at fair value with a market approach using December 31, 2008 market
values. Derivatives in Level 2 are measured at fair value with a market approach using third-party
pricing services which have been corroborated with data from active markets or broker quotes.
Concentration of Credit Risk
Most of our receivables are from a diverse group of companies, including major energy
companies, pipeline companies, local distribution companies, financial institutions and end-users
in various industries. Letters of credit or other appropriate security are obtained as necessary
to limit risk of loss. Our allowance for uncollectible receivables was $954,000 at December 31,
2008 and $583,000 at December 31, 2007. Commodity-based contracts expose us to the credit risk of
nonperformance by the counterparty to the contracts. These contracts consist of collars and fixed
price swaps. This exposure is diversified among major investment grade financial institutions the
majority of which we have master netting agreements with that provide for offsetting payables
against receivables from separate derivative contracts. Our derivative counterparties include
twelve financial institutions, ten of which are secured lenders in our bank credit facility.
Mitsui & Co. and J. Aron & Company are the two counterparties not in our bank group. At December
31, 2008, our net derivative receivable includes a receivable from J. Aron & Company of $987,000
and a receivable from Mitsui & Co. for $18.0 million.
F - 28
(12) EMPLOYEE BENEFIT AND EQUITY PLANS
Stock and Option Plans
We have six equity-based stock plans, of which two are active. Under the active plans,
incentive and non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights and annual cash incentive
awards may be issued to directors and employees pursuant to decisions of the Compensation
Committee, which is made up of outside independent directors from the Board of Directors. All
stock options and SARs granted under these plans have been issued at the prevailing market price at
the time of the grant. Since the middle of 2005, only SARs have been granted under the plans to
limit the dilutive impact of our equity plans. Information with respect to stock option and SARs
activities is summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Price |
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2005 |
|
|
8,742,305 |
|
|
$ |
9.31 |
|
Granted |
|
|
1,658,160 |
|
|
|
24.36 |
|
Stock options assumed in Stroud acquisition |
|
|
652,062 |
|
|
|
19.67 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(2,051,237 |
) |
|
|
9.22 |
|
Expired/forfeited |
|
|
(149,164 |
) |
|
|
18.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2006 |
|
|
8,852,126 |
|
|
|
12.76 |
|
Granted |
|
|
1,680,643 |
|
|
|
33.78 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(2,461,689 |
) |
|
|
9.45 |
|
Expired/forfeited |
|
|
(298,755 |
) |
|
|
23.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
7,772,325 |
|
|
|
17.95 |
|
Granted |
|
|
1,159,649 |
|
|
|
63.18 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(1,590,390 |
) |
|
|
12.24 |
|
Expired/forfeited |
|
|
(92,918 |
) |
|
|
40.82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
7,248,666 |
|
|
$ |
26.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table shows information with respect to outstanding stock options and SARs at
December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Exercisable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
Range of Exercise Prices |
|
Shares |
|
|
Life |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Price |
|
$1.29 $9.99 |
|
|
1,495,340 |
|
|
|
2.01 |
|
|
$ |
4.47 |
|
|
|
1,495,340 |
|
|
$ |
4.47 |
|
10.00 19.99 |
|
|
1,878,048 |
|
|
|
1.33 |
|
|
|
16.25 |
|
|
|
1,878,048 |
|
|
|
16.25 |
|
20.00 29.99 |
|
|
1,295,286 |
|
|
|
2.25 |
|
|
|
24.37 |
|
|
|
750,081 |
|
|
|
24.34 |
|
30.00 39.99 |
|
|
1,455,132 |
|
|
|
3.26 |
|
|
|
33.98 |
|
|
|
410,482 |
|
|
|
34.61 |
|
40.00 49.99 |
|
|
29,130 |
|
|
|
4.17 |
|
|
|
42.37 |
|
|
|
5,010 |
|
|
|
42.67 |
|
50.00 59.99 |
|
|
720,565 |
|
|
|
4.12 |
|
|
|
58.57 |
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
58.60 |
|
60.00 69.99 |
|
|
28,427 |
|
|
|
4.37 |
|
|
|
65.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70.00 75.00 |
|
|
346,738 |
|
|
|
4.38 |
|
|
|
75.00 |
|
|
|
26,484 |
|
|
|
75.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
7,248,666 |
|
|
|
2.47 |
|
|
$ |
26.15 |
|
|
|
4,565,625 |
|
|
$ |
15.74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F - 29
During 2008, 2007 and 2006, we granted SARs to officers, non-officer employees and directors.
The weighted average grant date fair value of these SARs, based on our Black-Scholes-Merton
assumptions, is shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Weighted average exercise price per share |
|
$ |
63.18 |
|
|
$ |
33.78 |
|
|
$ |
24.36 |
|
Expected annual dividends per share |
|
|
0.26 |
% |
|
|
0.36 |
% |
|
|
0.30 |
% |
Expected life in years |
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
Expected volatility |
|
|
41 |
% |
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
41 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average grant date fair value |
|
$ |
20.58 |
|
|
$ |
10.67 |
|
|
$ |
8.51 |
|
The volatility factors are based on a combination of both the historical volatilities of the
stock and implied volatility of traded options on our common stock. The dividend yield is based on
the current annual dividend at the time of grant. For SARs granted in 2007 and 2006, we used the
simplified method prescribed by SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 to estimate the expected
term of the options, which is calculated based on the midpoint between the vesting date and the
life of the SAR. For SARs granted in 2008, the expected term was based on the historical exercise
activity. The risk-free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of
grant for periods commensurate with the expected terms of the options. Of the 7.2 million grants
outstanding at December 31, 2008, 2.5 million grants relate to stock options with the remainder of
4.7 million grants relating to SARs.
The total intrinsic value (the difference in value between exercise and market price) of stock
options and SARs exercised during the years ended December 31, 2008 was $67.9 million compared to
$67.2 million in 2007 and $37.1 million in 2006. As of December 31, 2008, the aggregate intrinsic
value of the awards outstanding was $94.4 million. The aggregate intrinsic value and weighted
average remaining contractual life of stock option/SARs awards currently exercisable was $87.0
million and 1.9 years. As of December 31, 2008, the number of fully vested awards and awards
expected to vest was 7.2 million. The weighted average exercise price and weighted average
remaining contractual life of these awards were $25.81 and 2.45 years and the aggregate intrinsic
value was $94.3 million. As of December 31, 2008, unrecognized compensation cost related to the
awards was $23.2 million, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 0.9
years.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, total stock-based compensation expense for stock options
and SARs under SFAS No. 123(R) was $16.6 million compared to $15.2 million in 2007. For 2008, the
total related tax benefits were $4.1 million. For the year ended December 31, 2008, cash received
upon exercise of stock option awards was $9.0 million. Due to the net operating loss carryforward
for tax purposes, tax benefits realized for deductions that were in excess of the stock-based
compensation expense were not recognized.
Restricted Stock Grants
In 2008, we issued 362,000 shares of restricted stock grants as compensation to directors and
employees at an average price of $63.00. The restricted stock grants
included 14,400 issued to
directors, which vest immediately and 347,600 to employees with vesting generally over a three-year
period. In 2007, we issued 435,000 shares of restricted stock grants as compensation to directors
and employees, at an average price of $34.85. The restricted grants included 15,900 issued to
directors, which vest immediately, and 419,100 to employees with vesting over a three-year period.
In 2006, we issued 499,200 shares of restricted stock grants as compensation to directors and
employees, at an average price of $24.43. The restricted grants included 15,000 issued to
directors, which vest immediately, and 484,200 to employees with vesting over a three-to-four year
period. We recorded compensation expense for restricted stock grants of $14.7 million in the year
ended December 31, 2008 compared to $8.7 million in 2007 and $4.3 million in 2006. As of December
31, 2008, there was $23.1 million of unrecognized compensation related to restricted stock awards
expected to be recognized over the next three years, prior to mark-to-market adjustments. The
vesting of these shares is dependent only upon the employees continued service with us. For
restricted stock grants, the fair value is equal to the closing price of our common stock on the
grant date. All of our restricted stock grants are held in our
deferred compensation plan and the liability is
marked-to-market each reporting period based on the value of our stock. This mark-to-market is
presented in the statement of operations caption Deferred
compensation plan (see discussion below).
The proceeds received from the sale of stock held in our deferred compensation plan was $5.3
million in 2008.
F - 30
A summary of the status of our non-vested restricted stock outstanding at December 31, 2008
and changes during the twelve months then ended, is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Grant |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Date Fair Value |
|
Non-vested shares outstanding
at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
563,660 |
|
|
$ |
30.42 |
|
Granted |
|
|
362,313 |
|
|
|
63.00 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(438,058 |
) |
|
|
37.54 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(14,368 |
) |
|
|
38.87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested shares outstanding
at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
473,547 |
|
|
$ |
48.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
401(k) Plan
We maintain a 401(k) Plan for our employees. The 401(k) Plan permits employees to contribute
up to 50% of their salary (subject to Internal Revenue Service limitations) on a pretax basis.
Historically, we have made discretionary contributions of our common stock to the 401(k) Plan
annually. Beginning in 2008, we began matching up to 6% of salary in cash. All our contributions
become fully vested after the individual employee has two years of service with us. In 2008, we
contributed $2.7 million to the 401(k) Plan compared to $2.3 million in 2007 and $1.9 million in
2006. We do not require that employees hold any contributed Range stock in their account.
Employees have a variety of investment options in the 401(k) Plan. Employees may, at any time,
diversify out of our stock, based on their personal investment strategy.
Deferred Compensation Plan
In 1996, the Board of Directors adopted a deferred compensation plan (the Plan). The Plan
gave directors, officers and key employees the ability to defer all or a portion of their
salaries and bonuses and invest in Range common stock or make other investments at the individuals
discretion. Great Lakes Energy Partners (which we purchased in 2004) also had a deferred
compensation plan that allowed certain employees to defer all or a portion of their salaries and
bonuses and invest such amounts in certain investments at the employees discretion. In December
2004, we adopted the Range Resources Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan (2005 Deferred
Compensation Plan). The 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan is intended to operate in a manner
substantially similar to the old plans, subject to new requirements and changes mandated under
Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. The old plans will not receive additional
contributions. The assets of all of the plans are held in a rabbi trust, which we refer to as the
Rabbi Trust, and are therefore available to satisfy the claims of our creditors in the event of
bankruptcy or insolvency. Our stock held in the Rabbi Trust is
treated as a liability award (as
defined by SFAS No. 123(R)) as employees are allowed to take withdrawals from the Rabbi Trust
either in cash or in Range stock. The liability for the vested portion of the stock held in the Rabbi Trust is
reflected in the deferred compensation liability on our balance sheet
and is adjusted to fair value each reporting period by a charge or credit to
Deferred compensation plan
expense on our consolidated statement of operations. The assets of the Rabbi Trust, other than our
common stock, are invested in marketable securities and reported at their market value in the
balance sheet category Other assets. The deferred compensation liability on our consolidated
balance sheet reflects the vested market value of the marketable securities and the Range stock
held in the Rabbi Trust. Changes in the market value of the marketable securities and changes in
the fair value of the liability are charged or credited to
Deferred compensation plan expense each
quarter. We recorded mark-to-market income of $24.7 million in 2008 compared to mark-to-market
expense of $28.3 million in 2007 and $6.9 million in 2006. The Rabbi Trust held 2.3 million shares
(1.9 million of vested shares) of Range stock at December 31, 2008 compared to 2.1 million shares
(1.5 million of vested shares) at December 31, 2007.
F - 31
(13) SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
(in thousands) |
Net cash provided from continuing operations included: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes paid to (refunded from) taxing authorities |
|
$ |
4,298 |
|
|
$ |
(572 |
) |
|
$ |
1,973 |
|
Interest paid |
|
|
93,954 |
|
|
|
71,708 |
|
|
|
55,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash investing and finance activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.5 million shares issued for Stroud acquisition |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
177,641 |
|
Stock options (652,000) issued in Stroud acquisition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,478 |
|
Asset retirement costs capitalized, excluding acquisitions (a) |
|
|
4,647 |
|
|
|
(7,075 |
) |
|
|
25,821 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
For information regarding purchase price allocations of businesses
acquired see Note 9. |
(14) COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Litigation
We are involved in various legal actions and claims arising in the ordinary course of our
business. While the outcome of these lawsuits cannot be predicted with certainty, we do not expect
these matters to have a material adverse effect on our financial position, cash flows or results of
operations.
Lease Commitments
We lease certain office space, compressors and equipment under cancelable and non-cancelable
leases. Rent expense under such arrangements totaled $9.2 million in 2008 compared to $5.4 million
in 2007 and $5.0 million in 2006. Commitments related to these lease payments are not recorded in
the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Future minimum rental commitments under
non-cancelable leases having remaining lease terms in excess of one year are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
|
Lease |
|
|
|
Obligations |
|
2009 |
|
$ |
10,423 |
|
2010 |
|
|
10,536 |
|
2011 |
|
|
8,943 |
|
2012 |
|
|
6,057 |
|
2013 |
|
|
3,528 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
9,257 |
|
Sublease rentals |
|
|
(139 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
48,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other Commitments
We also have agreements in place to purchase seismic data. These agreements total $900,000 in
both 2009 and 2010. We have lease acreage that is generally subject to lease expiration if initial
wells are not drilled within a specified period, generally not exceeding two years. We do not
expect to lose significant lease acreage because of failure to drill due to inadequate capital,
equipment or personnel. However, based on our evaluation of prospective economics, we have
allowed acreage to expire and will allow additional acreage to expire in the
future.
F - 32
Transportation Contracts
We have entered firm transportation contracts with various pipelines. Under these contracts,
we are obligated to transport minimum daily gas volumes, or pay for any deficiencies at a specified
reservation fee rate. In most cases, our production committed to these pipelines is expected to
exceed the minimum daily volumes provided in the contracts. As of December 31, 2008, future
minimum transportation fees under our gas transportation commitments are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transportation |
|
|
|
Commitments |
|
2009 |
|
$ |
17,369 |
|
2010 |
|
|
16,725 |
|
2011 |
|
|
16,270 |
|
2012 |
|
|
13,332 |
|
2013 |
|
|
12,529 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
69,145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
145,370 |
|
|
|
|
|
In addition to the amounts included in the above table, we have contracted with a pipeline
company through 2017 to deliver natural gas production volumes in
Appalachia from
certain Marcellus Shale wells. The agreement calls for incremental increases over the initial
40,000 Mmbtu per day. These increases, which are contingent on certain pipeline modifications, are
30,000 Mmbtu per day in March 2009, 30,000 Mmbtu per day in October 2009, 30,000 Mmbtu per day in
March 2010 and an additional 20,000 Mmbtu per day for July 2010 for a total of an additional
110,000 Mmbtu per day.
Drilling Contracts
As of December 31, 2008, we have contracts with drilling contractors to use six drilling rigs
with terms of up to three years and minimum future commitments of $26.9 million in 2009, $58.4
million in both 2010 and 2011 and $31.7 million in 2012. Early termination of these contracts at
December 31, 2008 would have required us to pay maximum penalties of $129.3 million. We do not
expect to pay any early termination penalties related to these contracts.
Delivery Commitments
Under a sales agreement with Enterprise Products Operating, LLC, we have an obligation to
deliver 30,000 Mmbtu per day of volume at various delivery points within the Barnett Shale basin.
The contract, which began in 2008, extends for five years ending March 2013. As of December 31,
2008, remaining volumes to be delivered under this commitment are approximately 46.5 bcf.
(15) MAJOR CUSTOMERS
We market our production on a competitive basis. Gas is sold under various types of contracts
including month-to-month, and one-to-five-year contracts. Pricing on the month-to-month and
short-term contracts is based largely on NYMEX, with fixed or floating basis. For one to five-year
contracts, we sell our gas on NYMEX pricing, published regional index pricing or percentage of
proceeds sales based on local indices. We sell our oil under contracts ranging in terms from
month-to-month, up to as long as one year. The price for oil is generally equal to a posted price
set by major purchasers in the area or is based on NYMEX pricing or fixed pricing, adjusted for
quality and transportation differentials. We sell to oil and gas purchasers on the basis of price,
credit quality and service reliability. For the year ended December 31, 2008, one customer
accounted for 10% or more of total oil and gas revenues. For the year ended December 31, 2007, we
had no customers that accounted for 10% or more of total oil and gas revenues. For the year ended
December 31, 2006, two customers each accounted for 10% or more of total oil and gas revenues and
the combined sales to those customers accounted for 25% of total oil and gas revenues. We believe
that the loss of any one customer would not have a material adverse effect on our results.
(16) EQUITY METHOD INVESTMENTS
We account for our investments in entities over which we have significant influence, but not
control, using the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method of accounting, we record
our proportionate share of the net earnings, declared dividends and partnership distributions based
on the most recently available financial statements of the investee. We also evaluate our equity
method investments for potential impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate
that there is an other-than-temporary decline in value of the investment. Such events may include
sustained operating losses by the investee or long-term negative changes in the investees
industry. These indicators were not present, and as a result, we did not
F - 33
recognize any impairment charges related to our equity method investments for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 or 2006.
Investment in Whipstock Natural Gas Services, LLC
In 2006, we acquired a 50% interest in Whipstock Natural Gas Services, LLC (Whipstock), an
unconsolidated investee in the business of providing oil and gas drilling equipment, well servicing
rigs and equipment, and other well services in Appalachia. On the acquisition date, we contributed
cash of $11.7 million representing the fair value of 50% of the membership interest in Whipstock.
Whipstock follows a calendar year basis of financial reporting consistent with us and our
equity in Whipstocks earnings from the acquisition date is included in other revenue in our
results of operations for 2008, 2007 and 2006. During the year ended December 31, 2008, we
received cash distributions from Whipstock of $1.8 million. There were no dividends or partnership
distributions received from Whipstock during the years ended December 31, 2007 or 2006. In
determining our proportionate share of the net earnings of Whipstock, certain adjustments are
required to be made to Whipstocks reported results to eliminate the profits recognized by
Whipstock for services provided to us. For the year ended December 31, 2008, our equity in the
earnings of Whipstock totaled $479,000, compared to $132,000 in 2007 and $548,000 in 2006. In
2008, equity in the earnings of Whipstock was reduced by $1.8 million to eliminate the profit on
services provided to us compared to $2.7 million in 2007 and $1.1 million in 2006. Range and
Whipstock have entered into an agreement whereby Whipstock will provide us with the right of first
refusal such that we will have the opportunity to secure services from Whipstock in preference to
and in advance of Whipstock entering into additional commitments for services with other customers.
All services provided to us are based on Whipstocks usual and customary terms.
Investment in Nora Gathering, LLC
In May 2007, we completed the initial closing of a joint development arrangement with
Equitable Production Company. Pursuant to the terms of the arrangement, Range and Equitable (the
parties) agreed to among other things, form a new pipeline and natural gas gathering operations
entity, Nora Gathering, LLC (NGLLC). NGLLC is an unconsolidated investee created by the parties
for the purpose of conducting pipeline, natural gas gathering, and transportation operations
associated with the parties collective interests in properties in the Nora Field. In connection
with the acquisition, we contributed cash of $94.7 million for a 50% membership interest in NGLLC.
During 2008, Range and Equitable each contributed $29.0 million in additional capital to NGLLC in
order to fund the expansion of the Nora Field gathering system infrastructure.
NGLLC follows a calendar year basis of financial reporting consistent with Range and our
equity in NGLLC earnings from the acquisition date is included in other revenue in our results of
operations for 2008 and 2007. There were no dividends or partnership distributions received from
NGLLC during the years ended December 31, 2008 or December 31, 2007. In determining our
proportionate share of the net earnings of NGLLC, certain adjustments are required to be made to
NGLLCs reported results to eliminate the profits recognized by NGLLC included in the gathering and
transportation fees charged to us on production in the Nora field. For the year ended December 31,
2008 our equity in the earnings of NGLLC of $261,000 was reduced by $4.8 million to eliminate the
profit on gathering fees charged to us. For the year ended December 31, 2007, our equity in the
earnings of NGLLC of $841,000 was reduced by $1.8 million to eliminate the profit on gathering and
transportation fees charged to us. The gathering and transportation rate charged by NGLLC to us on
our production in the Nora field is considered to be at market.
F - 34
(17) SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
The following tables set forth unaudited financial information on a quarterly basis for each
of the last two years (in thousands). As discussed in Note 2, certain reclassifications have been
made to conform to our current year classifications. This includes the reclassification of
abandonment and impairment expense for unproved properties from depletion, depreciation and
amortization. These reclassifications did not impact net income.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
March |
|
|
June |
|
|
September |
|
|
December |
|
|
Total |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and gas sales |
|
$ |
307,384 |
|
|
$ |
347,622 |
|
|
$ |
347,720 |
|
|
$ |
223,834 |
|
|
$ |
1,226,560 |
|
Transportation and gathering |
|
|
1,129 |
|
|
|
1,224 |
|
|
|
1,537 |
|
|
|
687 |
|
|
|
4,577 |
|
Derivative fair value (loss) income |
|
|
(123,767 |
) |
|
|
(198,410 |
) |
|
|
272,869 |
|
|
|
119,443 |
|
|
|
70,135 |
|
Other |
|
|
20,592 |
|
|
|
(359 |
) |
|
|
544 |
|
|
|
898 |
|
|
|
21,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
205,338 |
|
|
|
150,077 |
|
|
|
622,670 |
|
|
|
344,862 |
|
|
|
1,322,947 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct operating |
|
|
32,950 |
|
|
|
37,228 |
|
|
|
36,532 |
|
|
|
35,677 |
|
|
|
142,387 |
|
Production and ad valorem taxes |
|
|
13,840 |
|
|
|
16,056 |
|
|
|
15,210 |
|
|
|
10,066 |
|
|
|
55,172 |
|
Exploration |
|
|
16,593 |
|
|
|
19,462 |
|
|
|
19,149 |
|
|
|
12,486 |
|
|
|
67,690 |
|
Abandonment and impairment of
unproved properties |
|
|
1,437 |
|
|
|
5,348 |
|
|
|
4,483 |
|
|
|
36,638 |
|
|
|
47,906 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
17,412 |
|
|
|
23,938 |
|
|
|
24,650 |
|
|
|
26,308 |
|
|
|
92,308 |
|
Deferred compensation plan |
|
|
20,611 |
|
|
|
7,539 |
|
|
|
(37,515 |
) |
|
|
(15,324 |
) |
|
|
(24,689 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
23,146 |
|
|
|
23,842 |
|
|
|
25,373 |
|
|
|
27,387 |
|
|
|
99,748 |
|
Depletion, depreciation and amortization |
|
|
70,133 |
|
|
|
72,115 |
|
|
|
76,690 |
|
|
|
80,893 |
|
|
|
299,831 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
196,122 |
|
|
|
205,528 |
|
|
|
164,572 |
|
|
|
214,131 |
|
|
|
780,353 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before
income taxes |
|
|
9,216 |
|
|
|
(55,451 |
) |
|
|
458,098 |
|
|
|
130,731 |
|
|
|
542,594 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
886 |
|
|
|
949 |
|
|
|
2,374 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
4,268 |
|
Deferred |
|
|
6,590 |
|
|
|
(21,818 |
) |
|
|
170,400 |
|
|
|
36,996 |
|
|
|
192,168 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,476 |
|
|
|
(20,869 |
) |
|
|
172,774 |
|
|
|
37,055 |
|
|
|
196,436 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
1,740 |
|
|
$ |
(34,582 |
) |
|
$ |
285,324 |
|
|
$ |
93,676 |
|
|
$ |
346,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
(0.23 |
) |
|
$ |
1.87 |
|
|
$ |
0.61 |
|
|
$ |
2.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
(0.23 |
) |
|
$ |
1.81 |
|
|
$ |
0.60 |
|
|
$ |
2.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F - 35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
March |
|
|
June |
|
|
September |
|
|
December |
|
|
Total |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and gas sales |
|
$ |
193,316 |
|
|
$ |
213,896 |
|
|
$ |
214,424 |
|
|
$ |
240,901 |
|
|
$ |
862,537 |
|
Transportation and gathering |
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
511 |
|
|
|
508 |
|
|
|
1,087 |
|
|
|
2,290 |
|
Derivative fair value (loss) income |
|
|
(42,620 |
) |
|
|
28,766 |
|
|
|
24,974 |
|
|
|
(18,887 |
) |
|
|
(7,767 |
) |
Other |
|
|
1,961 |
|
|
|
341 |
|
|
|
2,447 |
|
|
|
282 |
|
|
|
5,031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
152,841 |
|
|
|
243,514 |
|
|
|
242,353 |
|
|
|
223,383 |
|
|
|
862,091 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct operating |
|
|
25,414 |
|
|
|
24,816 |
|
|
|
28,003 |
|
|
|
29,266 |
|
|
|
107,499 |
|
Production and ad valorem taxes |
|
|
10,412 |
|
|
|
11,230 |
|
|
|
11,316 |
|
|
|
9,485 |
|
|
|
42,443 |
|
Exploration |
|
|
11,710 |
|
|
|
11,725 |
|
|
|
6,233 |
|
|
|
13,677 |
|
|
|
43,345 |
|
Abandonment and impairment of unproved properties |
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,707 |
|
|
|
4,887 |
|
|
|
6,750 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
14,678 |
|
|
|
17,838 |
|
|
|
18,058 |
|
|
|
19,096 |
|
|
|
69,670 |
|
Deferred compensation plan |
|
|
11,247 |
|
|
|
9,334 |
|
|
|
7,761 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
28,332 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
18,848 |
|
|
|
17,573 |
|
|
|
19,935 |
|
|
|
21,381 |
|
|
|
77,737 |
|
Depletion, depreciation and amortization |
|
|
47,176 |
|
|
|
51,465 |
|
|
|
55,294 |
|
|
|
66,643 |
|
|
|
220,578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
139,641 |
|
|
|
143,981 |
|
|
|
148,307 |
|
|
|
164,425 |
|
|
|
596,354 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
13,200 |
|
|
|
99,533 |
|
|
|
94,046 |
|
|
|
58,958 |
|
|
|
265,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
384 |
|
|
|
(101 |
) |
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
(96 |
) |
|
|
320 |
|
Deferred |
|
|
4,447 |
|
|
|
34,449 |
|
|
|
34,802 |
|
|
|
24,743 |
|
|
|
98,441 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,831 |
|
|
|
34,348 |
|
|
|
34,935 |
|
|
|
24,647 |
|
|
|
98,761 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
8,369 |
|
|
|
65,185 |
|
|
|
59,111 |
|
|
|
34,311 |
|
|
|
166,976 |
|
Discontinued operations, net of taxes |
|
|
64,768 |
|
|
|
(979 |
) |
|
|
(196 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,593 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
73,137 |
|
|
$ |
64,206 |
|
|
$ |
58,915 |
|
|
$ |
34,311 |
|
|
$ |
230,569 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
1.16 |
|
discontinued operations |
|
|
0.47 |
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
net income |
|
$ |
0.53 |
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
1.60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
$ |
1.11 |
|
discontinued operations |
|
|
0.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
net income |
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
$ |
1.54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal Unconsolidated Investees (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company |
|
December 31, 2008 Ownership |
|
Activity |
Whipstock
Natural Gas Services, LLC
|
|
|
50 |
% |
|
Drilling services |
Nora Gathering, LLC
|
|
|
50 |
% |
|
Gas gathering and transportation |
F - 36
(18) SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION ON NATURAL GAS AND OIL EXPLORATION, DEVELOPMENT
AND PRODUCTION ACTIVITIES
The following information concerning our gas and oil operations has been provided pursuant to
SFAS No. 69, Disclosures about Oil and Gas Producing
Activities,. Our gas and oil producing activities are conducted onshore within
the continental United States and offshore in the Gulf of Mexico. Our Gulf of Mexico assets were
sold in first quarter 2007. In December 2008, the SEC announced revisions to modernize oil and gas
reporting requirements which are effective for our December 31, 2009 reporting period. We are in
the process of evaluating the impact of these new requirements.
Capitalized Costs and Accumulated Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization (a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Oil and gas properties: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Properties subject to depletion |
|
$ |
5,273,458 |
|
|
$ |
4,172,151 |
|
|
$ |
3,132,927 |
|
Unproved properties |
|
|
766,186 |
|
|
|
271,426 |
|
|
|
226,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
6,039,644 |
|
|
|
4,443,577 |
|
|
|
3,359,093 |
|
Accumulated depreciation, depletion and
amortization |
|
|
(1,186,934 |
) |
|
|
(939,769 |
) |
|
|
(751,005 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net capitalized costs |
|
$ |
4,852,710 |
|
|
$ |
3,503,808 |
|
|
$ |
2,608,088 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes capitalized asset retirement costs and the
associated accumulated amortization. |
Costs Incurred for Property Acquisition, Exploration and Development (a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Acquisitions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unproved leasehold |
|
$ |
99,446 |
|
|
$ |
4,552 |
|
|
$ |
132,821 |
|
Proved oil and gas properties |
|
|
251,471 |
|
|
|
253,064 |
|
|
|
209,262 |
|
Purchase price adjustment (b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
147,062 |
|
Asset retirement obligations |
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
3,301 |
|
|
|
896 |
|
Acreage purchases (c) |
|
|
494,341 |
|
|
|
78,095 |
|
|
|
79,762 |
|
Development |
|
|
729,268 |
|
|
|
734,987 |
|
|
|
464,586 |
|
Exploration: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drilling |
|
|
133,116 |
|
|
|
40,567 |
|
|
|
25,618 |
|
Expense |
|
|
63,560 |
|
|
|
39,872 |
|
|
|
42,173 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
4,130 |
|
|
|
3,473 |
|
|
|
3,079 |
|
Gas gathering facilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploratory |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,418 |
|
Development |
|
|
47,056 |
|
|
|
18,655 |
|
|
|
16,272 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
1,822,639 |
|
|
|
1,176,566 |
|
|
|
1,124,949 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligations |
|
|
4,647 |
|
|
|
(7,075 |
) |
|
|
25,821 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs incurred (d) |
|
$ |
1,827,286 |
|
|
$ |
1,169,491 |
|
|
$ |
1,150,770 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets held for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
140,110 |
|
Development |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,114 |
|
|
$ |
15,012 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes cost incurred whether capitalized or expensed. |
|
(b) |
|
Represents the offset to our deferred tax liability resulting from
differences in book and tax basis at date of acquisition. |
|
(c) |
|
Includes a single transaction to acquire Marcellus Shale acreage for
$223.9 million. |
|
(d) |
|
2006 includes $21.5 million related to our divested Gulf of Mexico
properties. |
F - 37
Estimated Quantities of Proved Oil and Gas Reserves (Unaudited)
Reserves of crude oil, condensate, natural gas liquids and natural gas are estimated by our
engineers and are adjusted to reflect contractual arrangements and royalty rates in effect at the
end of each year. Many assumptions and judgmental decisions are required to estimate reserves.
Reported quantities are subject to future revisions, some of which may be substantial, as
additional information becomes available from reservoir performance, new geological and geophysical
data, additional drilling, technological advancements, price changes and other economic factors.
The SEC defines proved reserves as those volumes of crude oil, condensate, natural gas liquids
and natural gas that geological and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty are
recoverable from known reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions. Proved
developed reserves are those proved reserves, which can be expected to be recovered from existing
wells with existing equipment and operating methods. Proved undeveloped reserves are volumes
expected to be recovered as a result of additional investments for drilling new wells to offset
productive units, recompleting existing wells, and/or installing facilities to collect and
transport production.
Production quantities shown are net volumes withdrawn from reservoirs. These may differ from
sales quantities due to inventory changes, and, especially in the case of natural gas, volumes
consumed for fuel and/or shrinkage from extraction of natural gas liquids.
The reported value of proved reserves is not necessarily indicative of either fair market
value or present value of future net cash flows because prices, costs and governmental policies do
not remain static, appropriate discount rates may vary, and extensive judgment is required to
estimate the timing of production. Other logical assumptions would likely have resulted in
significantly different amounts.
The average realized prices used at December 31, 2008 to estimate reserve information were
$42.76 per barrel of oil, $25.00 per barrel for natural gas liquids and $5.23 per mcf for gas,
using benchmark prices (NYMEX) of $44.60 per barrel and $5.71 per Mmbtu. The average realized
prices used at December 31, 2007 to estimate reserve information were $91.88 per barrel for oil,
$52.64 per barrel for natural gas liquids and $6.44 per mcf for gas, using benchmark prices (NYMEX)
of $95.98 per barrel and $6.80 per Mmbtu. The average realized prices used at December 31, 2006 to
estimate reserve information were $57.66 per barrel for oil, $25.98 per barrel for natural gas
liquids and $5.24 per mcf for gas, using benchmark prices (NYMEX) of $61.05 per barrel and $5.64
per Mmbtu. All of our proved reserves are located within the United States.
F - 38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude Oil |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas |
|
|
|
and NGLs |
|
|
Natural Gas |
|
|
Equivalents (b) |
|
|
|
(Mbbls) |
|
|
(Mmcf) |
|
|
(Mmcfe) |
|
Proved developed and undeveloped reserves: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2005 |
|
|
46,892 |
|
|
|
1,125,410 |
|
|
|
1,406,762 |
|
Revisions |
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
(48,609 |
) |
|
|
(48,863 |
) |
Extensions, discoveries and additions |
|
|
10,871 |
|
|
|
314,261 |
|
|
|
379,491 |
|
Purchases |
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
121,683 |
|
|
|
123,133 |
|
Property sales |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(1,500 |
) |
|
|
(1,522 |
) |
Production |
|
|
(4,252 |
) |
|
|
(75,267 |
) |
|
|
(100,775 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2006 (a) |
|
|
53,707 |
|
|
|
1,435,978 |
|
|
|
1,758,226 |
|
Revisions |
|
|
2,432 |
|
|
|
(386 |
) |
|
|
14,207 |
|
Extensions, discoveries and additions |
|
|
13,741 |
|
|
|
401,805 |
|
|
|
484,250 |
|
Purchases |
|
|
1,934 |
|
|
|
121,382 |
|
|
|
132,984 |
|
Property sales |
|
|
(649 |
) |
|
|
(35,362 |
) |
|
|
(39,254 |
) |
Production |
|
|
(4,505 |
) |
|
|
(90,620 |
) |
|
|
(117,651 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2007 |
|
|
66,660 |
|
|
|
1,832,797 |
|
|
|
2,232,762 |
|
Revisions |
|
|
(3,155 |
) |
|
|
(23,397 |
) |
|
|
(42,333 |
) |
Extensions, discoveries and additions |
|
|
15,841 |
|
|
|
423,354 |
|
|
|
518,404 |
|
Purchases |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
95,262 |
|
|
|
95,578 |
|
Property sales |
|
|
(1,592 |
) |
|
|
(147 |
) |
|
|
(9,701 |
) |
Production |
|
|
(4,471 |
) |
|
|
(114,323 |
) |
|
|
(141,145 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2008 |
|
|
73,336 |
|
|
|
2,213,546 |
|
|
|
2,653,565 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved developed reserves: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
37,750 |
|
|
|
875,395 |
|
|
|
1,101,895 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
47,015 |
|
|
|
1,144,709 |
|
|
|
1,426,802 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
49,009 |
|
|
|
1,337,978 |
|
|
|
1,632,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The December 31, 2006 balance excludes reserves associated with the Austin Chalk
properties. The total proved developed and undeveloped reserves for these assets at December
31, 2006 were 42.3 Bcfe, which is comprised of 39.3 Bcfe of gas. These assets were sold in
the first quarter of 2007. |
|
(b) |
|
Oil and NGLs are converted to mcfe at the rate of one barrel equals six mcf. |
Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows Relating to Proved Oil and Gas Reserves
(Unaudited)
The following summarizes the policies we used in the preparation of the accompanying gas and
oil reserve disclosures, standardized measures of discounted future net cash flows from proved gas
and oil reserves and the reconciliations of standardized measures from year to year. The
information disclosed, as prescribed by SFAS No. 69, is an attempt to present the information in a
manner comparable with industry peers.
The information is based on estimates of proved reserves attributable to our interest in gas
and oil properties as of December 31 of the years presented. These estimates were prepared by our
petroleum engineering staff. Proved reserves are estimated quantities of natural gas and crude
oil, which geological and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be recoverable
in future years from known reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions.
F - 39
The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows from production of proved
reserves was developed as follows:
1. |
|
Estimates are made of quantities of proved reserves and future amounts expected to be
produced based on current year-end economic conditions. |
2. |
|
Estimated future cash inflows are calculated by applying current year-end prices of gas and
oil relating to our proved reserves to the quantities of those reserves produced in each
future year. |
3. |
|
Future cash flows are reduced by estimated production costs, administrative costs, costs to
develop and produce the proved reserves and abandonment costs, all based on current year-end
economic conditions. Future income tax expenses are based on current year-end statutory tax
rates giving effect to the remaining tax basis in the gas and oil properties, other
deductions, credits and allowances relating to our proved gas and oil reserves. |
4. |
|
The resulting future net cash flows are discounted to present value by applying a discount
rate of 10%. |
The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows does not purport, nor should it
be interpreted, to present the fair value of our gas and oil reserves. An estimate of fair value
would also take into account, among other things, the recovery of reserves not presently classified
as proved, anticipated future changes in prices and costs and a discount factor more representative
of the time value of money and the risks inherent in reserve estimates.
The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows relating to proved gas and oil
reserves is as follows and excludes cash flows associated with hedges outstanding at each of the
respective reporting dates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Future cash inflows |
|
$ |
14,293,651 |
|
|
$ |
17,231,826 |
|
Future costs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production |
|
|
(4,034,065 |
) |
|
|
(3,859,591 |
) |
Development |
|
|
(1,818,509 |
) |
|
|
(1,464,229 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future net cash flows before income taxes |
|
|
8,441,077 |
|
|
|
11,908,006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future income tax expense |
|
|
(2,381,826 |
) |
|
|
(3,854,952 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total future net cash flows before 10% discount |
|
|
6,059,251 |
|
|
|
8,053,054 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10% annual discount |
|
|
(3,477,871 |
) |
|
|
(4,386,691 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows |
|
$ |
2,581,380 |
|
|
$ |
3,666,363 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F - 40
The following table summarizes changes in the standardized measure of discounted future net
cash flows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Beginning of period |
|
$ |
3,666,363 |
|
|
$ |
2,002,224 |
|
|
$ |
3,384,310 |
|
Revisions of previous estimates: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in prices |
|
|
(1,675,703 |
) |
|
|
1,310,378 |
|
|
|
(2,390,159 |
) |
Revisions in quantities |
|
|
(65,931 |
) |
|
|
37,188 |
|
|
|
(91,793 |
) |
Changes in future development costs |
|
|
(688,259 |
) |
|
|
(542,684 |
) |
|
|
(623,607 |
) |
Accretion of discount |
|
|
520,482 |
|
|
|
277,144 |
|
|
|
488,737 |
|
Net change in income taxes |
|
|
719,595 |
|
|
|
(769,242 |
) |
|
|
733,846 |
|
Purchases of reserves in place |
|
|
148,857 |
|
|
|
348,119 |
|
|
|
231,314 |
|
Additions to proved reserves from extensions,
discoveries and improved recovery |
|
|
807,386 |
|
|
|
1,267,649 |
|
|
|
712,902 |
|
Production |
|
|
(1,029,001 |
) |
|
|
(711,354 |
) |
|
|
(554,788 |
) |
Development costs incurred during the period |
|
|
333,979 |
|
|
|
304,165 |
|
|
|
223,158 |
|
Sales of gas and oil |
|
|
(15,109 |
) |
|
|
(102,757 |
) |
|
|
(2,859 |
) |
Timing and other |
|
|
(141,279 |
) |
|
|
245,533 |
|
|
|
(108,837 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period |
|
$ |
2,581,380 |
|
|
$ |
3,666,363 |
|
|
$ |
2,002,224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F - 41
RANGE RESOURCES CORPORATION
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
2.1
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated May 10, 2006, by and among Range Resources Corporation,
Range Acquisition Texas, Inc. and Stroud Energy, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1
to our Form 8-K (File No. 001-12209) as filed with the SEC on May 16, 2006) |
|
3.1
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Range Resources Corporation (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 3.1.1 to our Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12209) as filed with the SEC on May 5, 2004) as
amended by the Certificate of First Amendment to Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Range
Resources Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to our Form 10-Q (File No.
001-12209) as filed with the SEC on July 28, 2005) |
|
3.2
|
|
Amended and Restated By-laws of Range (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to our Form 8-K
(File No. 001-12209) as filed with the SEC on February 17, 2009) |
|
4.1
|
|
Form of 7.375% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2013 (included as an exhibit to exhibit 4.2 hereto) |
|
4.2
|
|
Indenture dated July 21, 2003 by and among Range, as issuer, the Subsidiary Guarantors (as
defined herein), as guarantors, and Bank One, National Association, as trustee (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.4.2 to our Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12209) as filed with the SEC on
August 6, 2003) |
|
4.3
|
|
Form of 6.375% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2015 (included as an exhibit to exhibit 4.4 hereto) |
|
4.4
|
|
Indenture dated March 9, 2005 by and among Range, as issuer, the Subsidiary Guarantors (as
defined herein), as guarantors and J.P.Morgan Trust Company, National Association, as trustee
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 on our Form 8-K (File No. 001-12209) as filed with
the SEC on March 15, 2005) |
|
4.5
|
|
Form of 7.5% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2016 (included as an exhibit to exhibit 4.6 hereto) |
|
4.6
|
|
Indenture dated May 23, 2006 by and among Range, as issuer, the Subsidiary Guarantors (as
defined herein), as guarantors and J.P.Morgan Trust Company, National Association as trustee
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 on our Form 8-K (File No. 001-12209) as filed with
the SEC on May 23, 2006) |
|
4.7
|
|
Form of 7.5% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2017 (included as exhibit 4.8 hereto) |
|
4.8
|
|
Indenture dated September 28, 2007 by and among Range, as issuer, the subsidiary Guarantors (as
defined herein), as guarantors and J.P.Morgan Trust Company, National Association as trustee
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 on our Form 8-K (File No. 001-12209) as filed with
the SEC on October 1, 2007) |
|
10.1
|
|
Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement as of October 25, 2006 among Range (as borrowers)
and J.P.Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and the institutions named (therein) as lenders, J.P.Morgan
Chase as Administrative Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.1 to our Form 10-K (File No. 001-12209) as filed with the SEC February 27, 2007) |
|
10.2
|
|
First Amendment to the Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated October 26, 2006 among
Range (as borrower) and J.P.Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and institutions named (therein) as
lenders, J.P.Morgan Chase as Administrative Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
our Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12209) as filed with the SEC April 26, 2007) |
|
10.3
|
|
Second Amendment to the Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated October 26, 2006
among Range (as borrower) and J.P.Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and institutions named (therein) as
lenders, J.P.Morgan Chase as Administrative Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
our Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12209) as filed with the SEC April 26, 2007) |
|
10.4
|
|
Third Amendment to the Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated October 26, 2006 among
Range (as borrower) and J.P.Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and institutions named (therein) as
lenders, J.P.Morgan Chase as Administrative Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to
our Form 10-K (File No. 001-12209) as filed with the SEC February 27, 2008) |
|
10.5
|
|
Fourth Amendment to the Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated October 26, 2006
among Range (as borrower) and J.P.Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and institutions named (therein) as
lenders, J.P.Morgan Chase as Administrative Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
our Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12209) as filed with the SEC April 24, 2008) |
|
10.6*
|
|
Fifth Amendment to the Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated October 26, 2006 among
Range (as borrower) and J.P.Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and institutions named (therein) as
lenders, J.P.Morgan Chase as Administrative Agent |
|
10.7*
|
|
Sixth Amendment to the Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated October 26, 2006 among
Range (as borrower) and J.P.Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and institutions named (therein) as
lenders, J.P.Morgan Chase as Administrative Agent |
|
10.8
|
|
Amended and Restated Range Resources Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors and
Select Employees effective December 2, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our
Form 8-K (File No. 001-12209) as filed with the SEC on December 5, 2008) |
55
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
10.9
|
|
Form of Indemnity Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to our Form 8-K (File
No. 001-12209) as filed with the SEC on May 18, 2005) |
|
10.10
|
|
Range Resources Corporation 2005 Equity-Based Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.7 to our Form 8-K (File No. 001-12209) as filed with the SEC on May 18, 2005) |
|
10.11
|
|
First Amendment to the Range Resources Corporation 2005 Equity-Based Compensation Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to our Form 8-K (File No. 001-12209) as filed with
the SEC on May 18, 2005) |
|
10.12
|
|
Second Amendment to the Range Resources Corporation 2005 Equity-Based Compensation Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Form 8-K (File No. 001-12209) as filed with
the SEC on May 26, 2006) |
|
10.13
|
|
Third Amendment to the Range Resources Corporation 2005 Equity-Based Compensation Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to our Form 8-K (File No. 001-12209) as filed with
the SEC on May 26, 2006) |
|
10.14
|
|
Fourth Amendment to the Range Resources 2005 Equity-Based Compensation Plan (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.5 to our Form S-8 (File No. 333-143875) as filed with the SEC on June
19, 2007) |
|
10.15
|
|
Fifth Amendment to the Range Resources 2005 Equity-Based Compensation Plan (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.6 to our Form S-8 (File No. 333-143875) as filed with the SEC on June
19, 2007) |
|
10.16
|
|
Lomak 1989 Stock Option Plan dated March 13, 1989 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1(d)
to Lomaks Form S-1 (File No. 33-31558) as filed with the SEC on October 13, 1989) |
|
10.17
|
|
Amendment to the Lomak 1989 Stock Option Plan, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
4.1 to Lomaks Form S-8 (File No. 333-10719) as filed with the SEC on August 23, 1996) |
|
10.18
|
|
Amendment to the Lomak 1989 Stock Option Plan, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
4.2 to Lomaks Form S-8 (File No. 333-44821) as filed with the SEC on January 23, 1998) |
|
10.19
|
|
Lomak 1994 Outside Directors Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to
Lomaks Form S-8 (File No. 333-10719) as filed with the SEC on August 23, 1996) |
|
10.20
|
|
First Amendment to the Lomak 1994 Outside Directors Stock Option Plan dated June 8, 1995
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to our Form S-8 (File No. 333-40380) as filed with
the SEC on June 29, 2000) |
|
10.21
|
|
Second Amendment to the Lomak 1994 Outside Directors Stock Option Plan dated August 21, 1996
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to our Form S-8 (File No. 333-40380) as filed with
the SEC on June 29, 2000) |
|
10.22
|
|
Third Amendment to the Lomak 1994 Outside Directors Stock Option Plan dated June 1, 1999
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 to our Form S-8 (File No. 333-40380) as filed with
the SEC on June 29, 2000) |
|
10.23
|
|
Fourth Amendment to the Lomak 1994 Outside Directors Stock Plan dated May 24, 2000
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.9 to our Form S-8 (File No. 333-40380) as filed with
the SEC on June 29, 2000) |
|
10.24
|
|
2004 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan dated May 19, 2004 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.2 to our Form S-8 (File No. 333-116320) as filed with the SEC on June 9, 2004) |
|
10.25
|
|
Lomak 1997 Stock Purchase Plan, as amended, dated June 19, 1997 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1(1) to Lomaks Form 10-K (File No. 001-12209) as filed with the SEC on March 20,
1998) |
|
10.26
|
|
First Amendment to the Lomak 1997 Stock Purchase Plan dated May 26, 1999 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.2 to our Form S-8 (File No. 333-40380) as filed with the SEC on June 29,
2000) |
|
10.27
|
|
Second Amendment to the Lomak 1997 Stock Purchase Plan dated September 28, 1999 (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to our Form S-8 (File No. 333-40380) as filed with the SEC on June
29, 2000) |
|
10.28
|
|
Third Amendment to the Lomak 1997 Stock Purchase Plan dated May 24, 2000 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.4 to our Form S-8 (File No. 333-40380) as filed with the SEC on June 29,
2000) |
|
10.29
|
|
Fourth Amendment to the Lomak 1997 Stock Purchase Plan dated May 24, 2001 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.7 to our Form S-8 (File No. 333-63764) as filed with the SEC on June 25,
2001) |
|
10.30
|
|
Amended and Restated 1999 Stock Option Plan (as amended May 21, 2003) (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our Form S-8 (File No. 333-105895) as filed with the SEC on June 6,
2003) |
|
10.31
|
|
Fourth Amendment to the Amended and Restated 1999 Stock Option Plan dated May 19, 2004
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our Form S-8 (File No. 333-116320) as filed with
the SEC on June 9, 2004) |
|
10.32
|
|
Range Resources Corporation 401(k) Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to our Form
S-4 (File No. 333-108516) as filed with the SEC on September 4, 2003) |
|
10.33
|
|
Amended and Restated Range Resources Corporation Executive Change in Control Severance Benefit
Plan dated December 2, 2008 (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 to our Form 8-K (File
No. 001-12209) as filed with the SEC on December 5, 2008) |
|
21.1*
|
|
Subsidiaries of Registrant |
|
23.1*
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
|
23.2*
|
|
Consent of H.J. Gruy and Associates, Inc., independent consulting engineers |
|
23.3*
|
|
Consent of DeGoyler and MacNaughton, independent consulting engineers |
|
23.4*
|
|
Consent of Wright and Company, independent consulting engineers |
|
31.1*
|
|
Certification by the President and Chief Executive Officer of Range Pursuant to Section 302 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
56
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
31.2*
|
|
Certification by the Chief Financial Officer of Range Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
32.1**
|
|
Certification by the President and Chief Executive Officer of Range Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
32.2**
|
|
Certification by the Chief Financial Officer of Range Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed herewith. |
|
** |
|
Furnished herewith. |
57