CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA - FORM DEF 14A
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
(RULE 14a-101)
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934
Filed by the Registrant þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o
Check the appropriate box:
|
|
|
o |
|
Preliminary proxy statement. |
|
|
|
o |
|
Confidential, for use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)). |
|
|
|
þ |
|
Definitive Proxy Statement. |
|
|
|
o |
|
Definitive Additional Materials. |
|
|
|
o |
|
Soliciting Material Pursuant to § 240.14a-12. |
CORRECTIONS
CORPORATION OF AMERICA
(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
|
|
|
o |
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to
Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and
state how it was determined): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o |
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|
|
|
o |
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and
identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous
filing by registration statement number, or the form or schedule and the date of its filing. |
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Amount Previously Paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 7, 2006
To our stockholders:
You are invited to attend the 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Corrections Corporation
of America (the Company) to be held at 10:00 a.m., local time, on Thursday, May 11, 2006, at the
Companys corporate headquarters, 10 Burton Hills Boulevard, Nashville, Tennessee. The Notice of
Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement, both of which accompany this letter, provide details regarding
the business to be conducted at the meeting, as well as other important information about the
Company.
Following the formal matters to be addressed at the meeting, management will review our
recently completed 2005 fiscal year and provide a report on our progress, including recent
developments. Stockholders also will have the opportunity to ask questions about the Company.
Along with the other members of the Board of Directors and management, we look forward to
greeting you at the Annual Meeting if you are able to attend.
|
|
|
|
|
Sincerely, |
|
|
|
|
|
William F. Andrews |
|
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors |
|
|
|
|
|
John D. Ferguson |
|
|
Vice-Chairman of the Board of Directors, |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer, and President |
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA
10 Burton Hills Boulevard
Nashville, Tennessee 37215
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON THURSDAY, MAY 11, 2006
Time, Date, & Place
The Annual Meeting of Stockholders will be held at 10:00 a.m., local time, on Thursday, May
11, 2006, at the Companys corporate headquarters, 10 Burton Hills Boulevard, Nashville, Tennessee.
Items of Business
Stockholders will consider and vote on the following items at the Annual Meeting:
|
(1) |
|
The election of 12 directors to serve on the Companys Board of Directors; |
|
|
(2) |
|
The ratification of the appointment by the Companys Audit Committee of Ernst
& Young LLP as the Companys independent registered public accounting firm; and |
|
|
(3) |
|
Any other matters that are properly raised at the Annual Meeting. |
Who May Vote
Stockholders of record at the close of business on Tuesday, March 28, 2006 are entitled to
receive this notice and vote at the Annual Meeting.
How to Vote
Your vote is important. Most stockholders have a choice of voting on the Internet, by
telephone, or by mail using the enclosed proxy card. Please refer to the proxy card and the
accompanying Proxy Statement for information regarding your voting options. Even if you plan to
attend the Annual Meeting, please take advantage of one of the advance voting options to assure
that your shares are represented at the Annual Meeting. You may revoke your proxy at any time
before it is voted by following the procedures described in the accompanying Proxy Statement.
|
|
|
|
|
By Order of the Board of Directors, |
|
|
|
|
|
G. A. Puryear IV |
|
|
Executive Vice President, General Counsel, |
|
|
and Secretary |
April 7, 2006
Nashville, Tennessee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
i
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA
PROXY STATEMENT
FOR
THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON THURSDAY, MAY 11, 2006
We are providing this Proxy Statement, together with a Notice of Annual Meeting of
Stockholders and a form of proxy card, in connection with the solicitation by the Board of
Directors, or the Board, of Corrections Corporation of America, a Maryland corporation (the
Company, we, or us), of proxies to be voted at our 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and
any adjournment or postponement of the meeting (the Annual Meeting). These proxy materials are
being sent beginning on or about Friday, April 7, 2006.
The Annual Meeting will take place on Thursday, May 11, 2006, at 10:00 a.m., local time, at
the Companys corporate headquarters, 10 Burton Hills Boulevard, Nashville, Tennessee. All
stockholders are invited to attend. Because the Annual Meeting is being held at our corporate
headquarters, seating is limited and will be available on a first come, first served basis.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING
What matters will be acted on at the Annual Meeting?
Stockholders will consider and vote on the following matters at the Annual Meeting:
|
1. |
|
The election of 12 members to our Board of Directors; |
|
|
2. |
|
The ratification of the appointment by our Audit Committee of Ernst & Young LLP
as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2006; and |
|
|
3. |
|
Any other matters that are properly raised at the Annual Meeting. |
As of the date of this Proxy Statement, we are not aware of any other matters that will be
presented for action at the Annual Meeting.
What are the Board of Directors recommendations?
Our Board of Directors recommends that you vote:
|
|
|
FOR the election of each of the 12 nominees to serve as directors on the
Board of Directors. |
The Audit Committee of our Board of Directors recommends that you vote:
|
|
|
FOR the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP. |
If you complete and properly sign the accompanying proxy card and return it to the Company but
do not specify your vote, the proxy will be voted in accordance with the recommendations of the
Board of Directors set forth above. Further, if any other matter properly comes before the Annual
Meeting, the
1
proxy holders will vote as recommended by the Board of Directors or, if no
recommendation is given, in their own discretion.
Who is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting?
Stockholders of record of our common stock at the close of business on the record date are
entitled to receive the accompanying notice and to vote at the Annual Meeting. The Board of
Directors has fixed the close of business on Tuesday, March 28, 2006 as the record date.
As of the record date, there were 40,093,194 shares of common stock outstanding and entitled
to vote. Holders of common stock are entitled to one vote for each share of common stock held as
of the record date on each matter to be voted on at the Annual Meeting.
How do I vote?
Your vote is important. Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting in person, we urge you
to vote as soon as possible by completing, signing, dating, and promptly returning the enclosed
proxy card in the envelope provided or by voting by telephone or the Internet as described below.
If you choose to attend the meeting in person, you may revoke your proxy and personally cast your
votes.
Voting by proxy card. If you complete and properly sign the accompanying proxy card and return
it to the Company, it will be voted as you direct. If you are a registered stockholder and attend
the meeting, you may deliver your completed proxy card in person. Street name stockholders who
wish to vote at the meeting will need to obtain a proxy from the institution that holds their
shares.
Voting by telephone or the Internet. If you are a registered stockholder, you may also vote
by telephone by following the instructions on your proxy card. The deadline for registered holders
to vote by telephone is 11:59 p.m., Eastern Daylight Savings Time, on May 10, 2006. If your shares
are held in street name, you may vote by telephone or electronically through the Internet as
instructed on your proxy card. The deadline for street name holders voting by telephone or the
Internet is 11:59 p.m., Eastern Daylight Savings Time, on May 10, 2006.
401(k) shares. If you participate in the Corrections Corporation of America 401(k) Savings
and Retirement Plan, you may vote the shares of our common stock credited to your account as of the
record date by completing and returning the accompanying proxy card or by telephone by following
the instructions on your proxy card. If you do not vote your shares, the trustee will vote your
shares in its discretion.
Changing a vote. You may change your vote at any time before it is cast by filing with the
Secretary of the Company either a notice of revocation or a duly executed proxy bearing a later
date. If you have voted by telephone or by the Internet, you may change your vote by following the
same instructions used in originally voting your shares. Attendance at the meeting will not by
itself revoke a previously granted proxy.
What vote is required to approve each item?
Quorum Requirement. The presence, in person or by proxy, of the Companys stockholders
entitled to cast a majority of the votes entitled to be cast at the Annual Meeting is necessary to
constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the Annual Meeting. Abstentions and broker
non-votes will be treated as shares present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining the
presence of a quorum.
2
Election of Directors. Under the Companys Third Amended and Restated Bylaws (the Bylaws)
and Maryland law, the affirmative vote of a plurality of all of the votes cast at the Annual
Meeting is required for the election of directors. A properly executed proxy marked WITHHOLD
AUTHORITY with respect to the election of one or more directors will not be voted with respect to
the director or directors indicated, although it will be counted for the purposes of determining
whether there is a quorum.
Ratification of Ernst & Young LLP and Other Items. For the ratification of the appointment of
Ernst & Young LLP as the Companys independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal
year ending December 31, 2006 and any other matter that properly comes before the Annual Meeting,
the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast is required for approval. An ABSTAIN
election will not be counted as a vote for or against any such matter. As noted above, if any
other matter properly comes before the Annual Meeting, the proxy holders will vote as recommended
by the Board of Directors or, if no recommendation is given, in their own discretion.
If you hold your shares in street name through a broker or other nominee, your broker or
nominee may not be permitted to exercise voting discretion with respect to some of the matters to
be acted upon. Thus, if you do not give your broker or nominee specific instructions, your shares
may not be voted on those matters and will not be counted in determining the number of shares
necessary for approval. However, shares represented by such broker non-votes will be counted in
determining whether there is a quorum.
What if I am unable to attend the Annual Meeting in person?
A live broadcast of the Annual Meeting will be available on-line through our website at
www.correctionscorp.com (under the Webcasts section of the Investor page). The on-line replay
will be archived on our website promptly following the meeting.
Where can I find the voting results?
We will announce the voting results at the Annual Meeting. We also will report the voting
results in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the second quarter of fiscal year 2006, which we
expect to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, in August 2006.
How and when may I submit a stockholder proposal for the Companys 2007 Annual Meeting?
Our annual meeting of stockholders generally is held in May of each year. Consistent with
applicable SEC rules, we will consider for inclusion in our proxy materials for next years annual
meeting stockholder proposals that are received at our executive offices no later than December 9,
2006 and that
comply with other SEC rules regarding form and content. Proposals must be sent to the
following address: Corrections Corporation of America, Attention: Secretary, 10 Burton Hills
Boulevard, Nashville, Tennessee 37215.
Other stockholder proposals may be raised at next years meeting (but not considered for
inclusion in our proxy materials) if timely received and otherwise in compliance with the advance
notice provisions of our Bylaws. In order to be timely, notice must be received at our executive
offices (the address listed above) between February 11, 2007 and March 13, 2007.
3
Can I communicate directly with members of the Companys Board of Directors?
Yes. Stockholders, employees, and other parties interested in communicating directly with
members of the Companys Board of Directors (including specific members of the Board or
non-management directors as a group) may do so by writing to Corrections Corporation of America,
Attention: Secretary, 10 Burton Hills Boulevard, Nashville, Tennessee 37215. The Secretary of the
Company compiles all substantive communications and periodically submits them to the Board, the
group of directors, or the individual directors to whom they are addressed. Concerns relating to
accounting, internal controls, or auditing matters are handled in accordance with procedures
established by the Audit Committee.
How can I obtain the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K?
All stockholders of record on the record date will receive with this Proxy Statement a copy of
our 2005 Annual Report to Stockholders. The Annual Report to Stockholders is not part of the proxy
solicitation materials. Any stockholder who desires a copy of our 2005 Annual Report to
Stockholders or our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with
the SEC, may obtain a copy without charge by visiting our website, www.correctionscorp.com, or by
addressing a request to: Corrections Corporation of America, Attention: Secretary, 10 Burton Hills
Boulevard, Nashville, Tennessee 37215.
What are the costs of soliciting these proxies?
The Company pays the cost of soliciting proxies. We have retained Corporate Communications,
Inc. to assist with the solicitation of proxies on our behalf. Corporate Communications, Inc. will
receive a fee of $4,000, plus reasonable expenses, for these and other services in connection with
the Annual Meeting. Solicitation initially will be made by mail. Forms of proxies and proxy
materials may also be distributed through brokers, custodians, and other like parties to the
beneficial owners of shares of our common stock, in which case we will reimburse these parties for
their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses. Proxies may also be solicited personally or by telephone
or fax by directors, officers, and employees of the Company. No additional compensation will be
paid for these services.
How many copies should I receive if I share an address with another stockholder?
The SEC has adopted rules that permit companies and intermediaries such as brokers to satisfy
delivery requirements for proxy statements with respect to two or more stockholders sharing the
same address by delivering a single proxy statement addressed to those stockholders. This process,
which is commonly referred to as householding, potentially provides extra convenience for
stockholders and
cost savings for companies. The Company and some brokers household proxy materials,
delivering a single proxy statement to multiple stockholders sharing an address unless contrary
instructions have been received from the affected stockholders. Once you have received notice from
your broker or us that they or we will be householding materials to your address, householding will
continue until you are notified otherwise or until you revoke your consent. If at any time you no
longer wish to participate in householding and would prefer to receive a separate proxy statement,
or if you are receiving multiple copies of the proxy statement and wish to receive only one, please
notify your broker if your shares are held in a brokerage account or our transfer agent, identified
below, if you hold registered shares. You can also notify us by sending a written request to
Corrections Corporation of America, Attention: Karin Demler, 10 Burton Hills Boulevard, Nashville,
Tennessee 37215, or by calling Karin Demler at (615) 263-3000.
4
Who should I contact if I have any questions?
If you have any questions about the Annual Meeting or these proxy materials, please contact
Karin Demler, our director of investor relations, at 10 Burton Hills Boulevard, Nashville,
Tennessee 37215, (615) 263-3000. If you are a registered stockholder and have any questions about
your ownership of our common stock, please contact our transfer agent, the American Stock Transfer
and Trust Company, at 59 Maiden Lane, New York, New York 10038, (800) 937-5449, or Karin Demler at
the address and phone number above. If your shares are held in a brokerage account, please contact
your broker.
5
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
You can access our corporate charter, Bylaws, Corporate Governance Guidelines, current
committee charters, Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, and other corporate governance-related
information on our website, www.correctionscorp.com (under the Corporate Governance section of
the Investor page), or by addressing a written request to Corrections Corporation of America,
Attention: Secretary, 10 Burton Hills Boulevard, Nashville, Tennessee 37215. We did not make any
material revisions to these documents in 2005.
We believe that effective corporate governance is important to our long-term health and our
ability to create value for our stockholders. With leadership from our Nominating and Governance
Committee, our Board of Directors regularly evaluates regulatory developments and trends in
corporate governance to determine whether our policies and practices in this area should be
enhanced. The Nominating and Governance Committee also administers an annual self-evaluation
process for the Board and its standing committees. In addition, our directors are encouraged to
attend director education programs, which are reimbursed by the Company.
Board of Directors Meetings and Committees
Our Board of Directors is responsible for establishing the Companys broad corporate policies
and strategic objectives, reviewing our overall performance, and overseeing managements
performance. Among other things, the Board selects and evaluates our executive officers;
establishes, reviews, and approves our corporate objectives and strategies; and evaluates and
approves major capital commitments.
The Board currently consists of twelve members, all of whom are standing for re-election and
are identified, along with their biographical information, under Proposal I Election of
Directors. The Board met five times in 2005, with each director attending over 90% of their Board
and committee meetings. All directors attended all of the full Board meetings, except for one
director who missed one meeting, and all directors attended all of their committee meetings, except
for one director who missed one meeting. All directors attended last years annual meeting of
stockholders, and the Board has adopted as its policy that directors are strongly encouraged to
attend each annual meeting of stockholders.
Our Board of Directors has four regularly standing committees: the Audit, Compensation,
Nominating and Governance, and Executive Committees. Each committee has a written charter that has
been approved by the committee and the Board and that is reviewed at least annually. The table
below shows the current composition of each of our Board committees, together with a summary of
each committees responsibilities and the number of meetings each committee held in 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Committee |
|
Members |
|
Summary of Responsibilities |
|
Meetings |
Audit
|
|
C. Michael Jacobi (Chair)
Donna M. Alvarado
Lucius E. Burch, III
Charles L. Overby
Henri L. Wedell
|
|
See Audit Committee Report below.
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Joseph V. Russell (Chair)
John D. Correnti
John R. Horne
John R. Prann, Jr.
|
|
Responsible for executive and
director compensation and
administration of equity-based
compensation plans. Other
responsibilities include:
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
Evaluate the
performance of the CEO and
executive
officers; and |
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Committee |
|
Members |
|
Summary of Responsibilities |
|
Meetings |
|
|
|
Assist the
Nominating and Governance
Committee
with executive succession
planning
efforts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Report of the Compensation
Committee below. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nominating and
Governance
|
|
Charles L. Overby (Chair)
Thurgood Marshall, Jr.
Joseph V. Russell
|
|
Responsible for identifying and
recommending director nominees to
the full Board and taking a
leadership role in shaping and
evaluating the Boards corporate
governance initiatives. Other
responsibilities include:
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
Review and assess the
Companys ethics and
compliance
program; |
|
|
|
|
Oversee Boards
self-evaluation process; and |
|
|
|
|
Lead the Boards executive
succession planning
efforts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Director Candidates below. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive
|
|
John D. Ferguson (Chair)
William F. Andrews
Lucius E. Burch, III
Joseph V. Russell
|
|
When necessary, and subject to
authority limitations with respect
to significant corporate actions,
responsible for acting on behalf of
the full Board during intervals
between Board meetings.
|
|
|
0 |
|
Executive Sessions
Executive sessions, or meetings of our non-management directors without management present,
are held regularly in order to provide an opportunity for the outside directors to discuss openly
any and all matters. Executive sessions of the Board are chaired on a rotating basis by the
outside directors, with rotation in alphabetical order by last name. In 2005, the outside
directors met in executive session one time.
Director Independence
Mr. Andrews and Mr. Ferguson are the only members of the Board of Directors who are CCA
employees. The Board has determined that all of our other directors are independent. Accordingly,
10 of our 12 directors are independent and our Audit, Compensation, and Nominating and Governance
Committees are composed entirely of independent directors. In making its independence
determinations, the Board used the standards for director independence set forth in the New York
Stock Exchange (NYSE) corporate governance listing standards (Section 303A) and our Corporate
Governance Guidelines and, with respect to Audit Committee members, Section 10A(m)(3) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
7
As disclosed in our proxy statements for the prior two years, the Board determined that the
independence of Mr. Correnti and Mr. Horne could be considered impaired for parts of 2004 and 2005
as a result of the application of the three year look back period required by the revised NYSE
independence standards that became effective in November 2003. Each resigned from the Compensation
Committee in February 2004 to ensure our compliance with the NYSE standards. The NYSE again
revised its independence standards in November 2004. In December 2004, the Board determined that
Mr. Correntis independence would not be considered impaired under the revised standards and
accordingly that he was independent, and re-appointed him to the Compensation Committee. With
respect to Mr. Horne, the Board determined that he was independent and re-appointed him to the
Compensation Committee based upon the expiration of the three year look back period in February
2005.
Independence and Financial Literacy of Audit Committee Members
The Board has determined that each member of the Audit Committee is independent as defined by
the standards of the NYSE and Rule 10A-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Board also
has determined that each member is financially literate as defined by the rules of the NYSE and
that Mr. Jacobi is an audit committee financial expert as defined in Item 401(e) of Regulation
S-K under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Director Compensation
Employee directors (Mr. Andrews and Mr. Ferguson) do not receive compensation for Board
service. Non-employee directors are compensated pursuant to our Non-Employee Directors
Compensation and Non-Employee Directors Share Option Plans, which provide for the following:
|
|
|
Annual option grants; |
|
|
|
|
Annual retainers; and |
|
|
|
|
Board and committee meeting fees. |
Non-employee directors may elect to receive all or a portion of their retainers in the form of
common stock rather than cash. Non-employee directors may also defer all or a portion of their
retainer and meeting fees pursuant to our Non-Employee Directors Deferred Compensation Plan. In
addition, non-employee directors are reimbursed for reasonable expenses incurred to attend Board
and committee meetings, as well as director education programs.
The retainers and meeting fees paid to our non-employee directors were modified in December
2005. The current and previous amounts for retainers and meeting fees are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
Previous |
Retainers and Fees |
|
(2006) |
|
(2005) |
Board retainer |
|
$ |
50,000 |
|
|
$ |
45,000 |
|
Board meeting fee |
|
$ |
3,000 |
|
|
$ |
3,000 |
|
Audit chair retainer |
|
$ |
10,000 |
|
|
$ |
7,500 |
|
Audit member retainer |
|
$ |
2,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,000 |
|
Compensation, Nominating and Governance chair
retainer |
|
$ |
5,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,000 |
|
Committee chair meeting fee (excluding Executive) |
|
$ |
2,500 |
|
|
$ |
2,500 |
|
Non-chair committee meeting fee |
|
$ |
2,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,000 |
|
In 2005, total retainers and meeting fees paid to non-employee directors ranged from $59,000
to $84,000. In addition to cash compensation, each non-employee director receives an annual grant
of a
8
non-qualified option for the purchase of 4,000 shares of the Companys common stock. The
option has an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the stock on the grant date and is
fully vested as of the grant date. The terms and amounts of option grants have not changed with
respect to 2005 or 2006.
Director Candidates
The Nominating and Governance Committee considers candidates for Board membership suggested by
its members and other Board members, as well as management and stockholders. A stockholder who
wishes to recommend a prospective nominee for the Board should notify our Secretary in writing,
along with any supporting material the stockholder considers appropriate, in accordance with the
stockholder proposal provisions of our Bylaws. General information concerning the submission of
stockholder proposals is provided above under the caption How and when may I submit a stockholder
proposal for the Companys 2007 Annual Meeting? Pursuant to Board policy, there are to be no
differences in the manner in which the Committee evaluates candidates based on the source of the
recommendation.
The Nominating and Governance Committee is authorized by the Board to identify director
candidates, evaluate and consider candidates proposed by any director, member of management, or
stockholder, develop and implement screening processes it deems necessary and appropriate, and
recommend for selection by the Board director nominees for each annual meeting of stockholders and,
when necessary, vacancies on the Board. The Committee is authorized by the Board to exercise sole
authority in retaining any third-party search firm the Committee deems appropriate to identify and
assist with the evaluation of director candidates, and has utilized that authority in past director
searches.
The Committee evaluates prospective nominees against the criteria in our Corporate Governance
Guidelines and the Director Nominations Policy adopted by the Board, which include
professional integrity and sound judgment, sufficient time available to devote to Board
activities, a general understanding of marketing, finance, and other elements relevant to the
success of a publicly-traded company in todays business environment, an understanding of our
business, and factors such as diversity, age, skills, and educational and professional background.
The Committee may also consider other factors it deems relevant, including the current composition
of the Board, whether there is a need to fill vacancies or expand or contract the size of the
Board, the balance of management and independent directors, the need for expertise on our standing
committees, and the qualifications of other prospective nominees. With respect to determining
whether current directors should stand for re-election, the Nominating and Governance Committee
also considers the directors past attendance at meetings and participation in and contributions to
the activities of the Board and the Company.
With respect to new candidates for Board service, a full evaluation may also include detailed
background checks, in-person and telephonic interviews with Nominating and Governance Committee and
other Board members, and consultation with our Chairman and other Board members. The Committee
evaluation process culminates with a decision as to whether or not to recommend the prospective
nominee to the full Board for appointment and/or nomination.
Limitations on Other Board Service
The Audit Committee charter provides that a member of the Audit Committee may not serve on the
audit committee of more than two other public companies without Board approval. Otherwise, we do
not believe that our directors should be categorically prohibited from serving on boards and/or
board committees of other organizations. However, our Corporate Governance Guidelines and Director
Nominations Policy instruct the Nominating and Governance Committee and the full Board to take into
account the nature of and time involved in a directors service on other boards in evaluating the
suitability
9
of individual directors and in making its recommendations to our stockholders. Service
on boards and/or committees of other organizations must also be consistent with our conflicts of
interest policy, as set forth in our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, which, among other
things, requires a director to provide notice to the Board of his or her acceptance of a nomination
to serve on the board of another public company.
Communications with Directors
Stockholders, employees, and other interested parties may communicate with members of the
Companys Board of Directors (including specific members of the Board or non-management directors
as a group) by writing to Corrections Corporation of America, Attention: Secretary, 10 Burton Hills
Boulevard, Nashville, Tennessee 37215. To the extent such communications are received, our
Secretary compiles all substantive communications and periodically submits them to the Board, the
group of directors, or the individual directors to whom they are addressed. Communications that
the Secretary would not consider substantive, and therefore may not submit to the addressee, may
include junk mail, mass mailings, resumes and job inquiries, surveys, business solicitations,
advertisements, frivolous communications, and other similarly unsuitable communications.
Communications expressing concerns or complaints relating to accounting, internal controls, or
auditing matters are handled in accordance with procedures established by the Audit Committee.
Under those procedures, concerns that are improperly characterized as having to do with
accounting, internal controls, or auditing matters or that are frivolous or clearly inconsequential
may be addressed by the Secretary without presentation to the Audit Committee. However, in all
cases the Secretary maintains a log of correspondence addressed to directors that may be reviewed
by any director at his or her request.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
Since the beginning of the last fiscal year, we are aware of no related party transactions
between us and any of our directors, executive officers, 5% stockholders, or their family members
which require disclosure under Item 404 of Regulation S-K under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
During 2005, Mr. Prann, Mr. Russell and Mr. Correnti served on our Compensation Committee for
the full year, with Mr. Russell serving as the committees chair. Mr. Horne served on the
committee for a portion of the year. None of the foregoing current and former members of the
Compensation Committee or any of their family members serve or have served as an officer or
employee of the Company. None of our executive officers served during 2005 as a member of the
board of directors or compensation committee (or other committee serving an equivalent function) of
any entity that had one or more executive officers serving as a member of the Compensation
Committee.
Code of Ethics and Business Conduct
All of our directors and employees, including our Chief Executive Officer and President, Chief
Financial Officer, and principal accounting officer, are subject to our Code of Ethics and Business
Conduct. Our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct and related compliance policies are designed to
promote an environment in which integrity is valued, business is conducted in a legal and ethical
manner,
and ethics and compliance issues are raised and addressed. Our Nominating and Governance Committee
is responsible for reviewing the Code annually and our Audit Committee is responsible for
addressing any violations or waivers involving our executive officers and directors. We intend to
post amendments to or waivers from our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct (to the extent
applicable to our directors, chief
10
executive officer, principal financial officer, or principal
accounting officer) on our website. Our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct is accessible on our
website, www.correctionscorp.com (under the Corporate Governance section of the Investor page).
Report of the Audit Committee
The following Report of the Audit Committee does not constitute soliciting material and should
not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any other Company filing under the Securities
Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent the Company specifically
incorporates this Report by reference therein.
General Responsibilities
Our Audit Committee is charged with oversight of the integrity of our financial statements;
the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; our compliance with legal and
regulatory requirements; the qualifications, independence, and performance of our independent
registered public accounting firm; and the performance of our internal audit function. Among other
things, the Committee monitors preparation by our management of quarterly and annual financial
reports and interim earnings releases; reviews Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations prior to the filing of our periodic reports with the SEC;
supervises our relationship with our independent registered public accounting firm, including
making decisions with respect to appointment or removal, reviewing the scope of audit services,
approving audit and non-audit services, and annually evaluating the audit firms independence; and
oversees managements implementation and maintenance of effective systems of internal accounting
and disclosure controls, including review of our policies relating to legal and regulatory
compliance and review of our internal auditing program. The full text of the Audit Committee
charter is available on the Companys website at www.correctionscorp.com (under the Corporate
Governance section of the Investor page).
2005 Meetings
The Audit Committee met five times in 2005. Within those meetings, the Committee conducted
executive sessions with our independent registered public accounting firm three times. The
Committee also meets in separate executive sessions periodically with each of management and the
Companys internal audit personnel.
Oversight of Financial Reporting
As part of its oversight of our financial statements, the Committee reviews and discusses with
both management and our independent registered public accounting firm all annual and quarterly
financial statements prior to their issuance. With respect to fiscal 2005, management advised the
Committee that each set of financial statements reviewed had been prepared in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles and reviewed significant accounting and disclosure issues
with the Committee. These reviews included discussion with the independent registered public
accounting firm of matters required to be discussed pursuant to Statement on Auditing Standards No.
61 (Communication with Audit Committees), as amended, including the quality of our accounting
principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments, and the clarity of disclosures in the
financial statements. The Committee also discussed with Ernst & Young LLP matters relating to its
independence, including a
review of audit and non-audit fees and the disclosures made to the Committee pursuant to
Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1 (Independence Discussions with Audit Committees).
11
Also with respect to fiscal 2005, management completed the documentation, testing, and
evaluation of the Companys system of internal control over financial reporting in response to the
requirements set forth in Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and related regulations.
The Audit Committee received periodic updates provided by management, the independent registered
public accounting firm, and the internal auditors at each regularly scheduled Audit Committee
meeting, and provided oversight during the process. At the conclusion of the process, management
provided the Audit Committee with, and the Audit Committee reviewed a report on, the effectiveness
of our internal control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee also reviewed the following,
all of which are included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005:
Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting; Ernst & Young LLPs Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm; and Ernst & Young LLPs Report of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.
Taking all of these reviews and discussions into account, the undersigned Committee members
recommended to the Board of Directors that the Board approve the inclusion of our audited financial
statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, for
filing with the SEC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Submitted by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Michael Jacobi, Chair
|
|
Charles L. Overby |
|
|
Donna M. Alvarado
|
|
Henri L. Wedell |
|
|
Lucius E. Burch, III |
|
|
12
PROPOSAL I ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Directors Standing for Election
The current term of office of each of our directors expires at the Annual Meeting. The Board
of Directors proposes that the following nominees, all of whom are currently serving as directors,
be re-elected for a new term of one year and until their successors are duly elected and qualified.
We expect each of the nominees to serve if elected. If any of them becomes unavailable to serve
as a director, the Board may designate a substitute nominee. In that case, the persons named as
proxies will vote for the substitute nominee designated by the Board.
Information regarding each of the nominees for director is set forth below. Directors ages
are given as of the date of this Proxy Statement.
The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote FOR each of the 12 nominees listed below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
WILLIAM F. ANDREWS
|
|
Director since 2000 |
Mr. Andrews, age 74, has served as a director and Chairman of our Board since August 2000.
Mr. Andrews also serves as a member of our Executive Committee. Mr. Andrews has been a principal
of Kohlberg & Company, a private equity firm specializing in middle market investing, since 1995.
He also currently serves as: chairman of Katy Industries, Inc., a publicly-traded diversified
manufacturing company with consumer and commercial product lines; a director of Black Box
Corporation, a publicly-traded provider of information technology infrastructure solutions; a
director of Trex Corporation, a publicly-traded producer of decking and railing products; a
director of OCharleys Inc., a publicly-traded restaurant company; and chairman of Allied
Aerospace (aerospace hardware manufacturer) and Singer Co. (sewing machine manufacturer), both
private companies. Mr. Andrews is a graduate of the University of Maryland and received an M.B.A
from Seton Hall University.
|
|
|
|
|
|
JOHN D. FERGUSON
|
|
Director since 2000 |
Mr. Ferguson, age 60, has served as a director, our Chief Executive Officer and President, and
Vice-Chairman of our Board since August 2000. Mr. Ferguson also serves as the Chair of our
Executive Committee. Mr. Fergusons career in business and government includes service as the
Commissioner of Finance for the State of Tennessee and as the chairman and chief executive officer
of Community Bancshares, Inc., the parent corporation of The Community Bank of Germantown
(Tennessee), as well as service on the State of Tennessee Board of Education and the Governors
Commission on Practical Government for the State of Tennessee. Mr. Ferguson currently serves as a
director of the Tennessee Performing Arts Center, the Boy Scouts of America Middle Tennessee
Council and the Nashville Alliance for Public Education. Mr. Ferguson graduated from Mississippi
State University in 1967.
|
|
|
|
|
|
DONNA M. ALVARADO
|
|
Director since 2003 |
Ms. Alvarado, age 57, has served as a director and member of our Audit Committee since
December 2003. Ms. Alvarado is the founder and current President of Aguila International, an
international business-consulting firm that specializes in human resources and leadership
development. In addition to her established career in the private sector, Ms. Alvarado has held
senior management positions in government, including Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense with the
U.S. Department of Defense,
Counsel for the U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary Subcommittee on Immigration and Refugee
13
Policy, Staff Member of the U.S. House of Representatives Select Committee on Narcotics Abuse and
Control, and Director of ACTION, the federal domestic volunteer agency, a position to which she was
appointed by President Reagan. Ms. Alvarado currently serves as a Regent on the Ohio Board of
Regents, as a member of the Ohio Governors Commission on Higher Education and the Economy, and as
Chair of the Ohio Governors Workforce Policy Board. Ms. Alvarado earned both a masters and a
bachelors degree in Spanish from Ohio State University, completed doctoral coursework in Latin
American Literature at the University of Oklahoma, and earned a postgraduate certificate in
Financial Management from the Wharton School of Business at the University of Pennsylvania.
|
|
|
|
|
|
LUCIUS E. BURCH, III
|
|
Director since 2000 |
Mr. Burch, age 64, has served as a director and member of our Audit Committee since December
2000 and also serves on our Executive Committee. Mr. Burch is the chairman and chief executive
officer of Burch Investment Group, a private venture capital firm located in Nashville, Tennessee,
a position he has held since October 1989. Mr. Burch currently serves on the boards of directors
of several private companies, including Maxwell Medical, Education Networks of America, and MCT
Corp. Mr. Burch graduated from the University of North Carolina where he received a B.A. degree in
1963.
|
|
|
|
|
|
JOHN D. CORRENTI
|
|
Director since 2000 |
Mr. Correnti, age 59, has served as a director since December 2000 and is a member of our
Compensation Committee. Mr. Correnti currently serves as the chief executive officer of SeverCorr,
LLC, a start-up company formed in 2005 to construct and operate a state-of-the-art steel mill in
Mississippi through a joint venture between Severstall Group and SteelCorr, LLC, where Mr. Correnti
was chairman and chief executive officer since December 2002. From December 1999 through December
2002, Mr. Correnti served as the chairman of the board of directors and as the chief executive
officer of Birmingham Steel Corporation, a publicly-traded steel manufacturing company. Mr.
Correnti also serves as a director of Navistar International Corporation. Mr. Correnti holds a
B.S. degree in civil engineering from Clarkson University.
|
|
|
|
|
|
JOHN R. HORNE
|
|
Director since 2001 |
Mr. Horne, age 68, has served as a director since December 2001 and is a member of our
Compensation Committee. Mr. Horne served as chairman of Navistar International Corporation, a
publicly-traded truck and engine manufacturer, from April 1996 to February 2004 and as Navistars
president and chief executive officer from March 1995 to February 2003. Mr. Horne currently serves
on the board of directors of Junior Achievement of Chicago. Mr. Horne received his M.S. degree in
mechanical engineering from Bradley University in 1964, a B.S. degree in mechanical engineering
from Purdue University in 1960, which also awarded him an Honorary Doctor of Engineering degree in
May 1998, and is a graduate of the management program at Harvard Graduate School of Business
Administration.
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. MICHAEL JACOBI
|
|
Director since 2000 |
Mr. Jacobi, age 64, has served as a director and as Chair of the Audit Committee since
December 2000. Mr. Jacobi currently acts as a consultant and advisor to businesses through his
consulting firm, Stable House Consulting. From June 2001 through May 2005, Mr. Jacobi served as
the President and Chief Executive Officer and a director of Katy Industries, Inc., a
publicly-traded diversified manufacturing company. Mr. Jacobis prior business experience includes
service as Chairman of Timex Watches Limited (India), as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
Beepware Paging Products, L.L.C., and as
President and Chief Executive Officer and a director of Timex Corporation. He is also a member of
the
14
board of directors of Webster Financial Corporation, a publicly-traded banking and financial
services company, and Invisible Technologies, Inc. a private company that makes electronic pet
containment equipment. Mr. Jacobi is a certified public accountant and holds a B.S. degree from
the University of Connecticut.
|
|
|
|
|
|
THURGOOD MARSHALL, JR.
|
|
Director since 2002 |
Mr. Marshall, age 49, has served as a director and member of the Nominating and Governance
Committee since December 2002. Mr. Marshall is a partner in the law firm of Bingham McCutchen LLP
in Washington D.C., and a principal in Bingham Consulting Group LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of
Bingham McCutchen LLP that assists business clients with communications, political and legal
strategies. Mr. Marshall, the son of the historic Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall, has
held appointments in each branch of the federal government, including Cabinet Secretary to
President Clinton and Director of Legislative Affairs and Deputy Counsel to Vice President Al Gore.
In his role under President Clinton, Mr. Marshall was the chief liaison between the President and
the agencies of the Executive Branch. He serves on the American Bar Association Election Law
Committee and serves as a board member of the National Fish & Wildlife Foundation, the National
Womens Law Center and the Supreme Court Historical Society, and serves on the Ethics Oversight
Committee of the United States Olympic Committee. Mr. Marshall earned a B.A. in 1978 and a J.D. in
1981 from the University of Virginia, after which he clerked for United States District Judge
Barrington D. Parker.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CHARLES L. OVERBY
|
|
Director since 2001 |
Mr. Overby, age 59, has served as a director since December 2001. Mr. Overby has served as a
member of the Audit Committee since February 2002 and as the Chair of the Nominating and Governance
Committee since the committee was established in December 2002. Mr. Overby is the chairman and
chief executive officer of The Freedom Forum, an independent, non-partisan foundation dedicated to
the First Amendment and media issues, and two of the foundations affiliate organizations: The
Newseum and The Diversity Institute. Mr. Overby is a former Pulitzer Price-winning editor in
Jackson, Mississippi. He worked 16 years for Gannett Co., the nations largest newspaper company,
in various capacities, including as reporter, editor, and corporate executive. He was vice
president for news and communications for Gannett and served on the management committee of Gannett
and USA TODAY. Mr. Overby currently serves on the boards of the Committee to Protect Journalists
and the Horatio Alger Association of Distinguished Americans. Mr. Overby attended the University
of Mississippi and serves on the board of the University of Mississippi Foundation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
JOHN R. PRANN, JR.
|
|
Director since 2000 |
Mr. Prann, age 55, has served as a director and member of the Compensation Committee since
December 2000. Mr. Pranns business experience includes service as the President and Chief
Executive Officer of Katy Industries, Inc., as the chief executive officer of CRL, Inc. and Profile
Gear Corporation, as a member of the boards of directors of CPAC, Inc. and Dynojet Research and as
a partner with the accounting firm of Deloitte & Touche. Mr. Prann earned a B.A. in Biology from
the University of California, Riverside and an M.B.A from the University of Chicago.
|
|
|
|
|
|
JOSEPH V. RUSSELL
|
|
Director since 1999 |
Mr. Russell, age 65, has served as a director since 1999. Mr. Russell is the Chair of the
Compensation Committee and a member of the Executive Committee and the Nominating and Governance
Committee.
Mr. Russell is the president and chief financial officer of Elan-Polo, Inc., a Nashville-based,
privately-
15
held, world-wide producer and distributor of footwear. Mr. Russell is also the vice
president of and a principal in RCR Building Corporation, a Nashville-based, privately-held builder
and developer of commercial and industrial properties. He also serves on the boards of directors of
several private companies and associations. Mr. Russell graduated from the University of Tennessee
in 1963 with a B.S. in Finance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
HENRI L. WEDELL
|
|
Director since 2000 |
Mr. Wedell, age 64, has served as a director and member of the Audit Committee since December
2000. Mr. Wedell is a private investor in Memphis, Tennessee. Prior to his retirement in 1999,
Mr. Wedell was the senior vice president of sales of The Robinson Humphrey Co., an investment
banking subsidiary of Smith-Barney, Inc., with which he was employed for over 24 years. Mr.
Wedells business career also includes service as a member of the board of directors of Community
Bancshares, Inc. Mr. Wedell earned an M.B.A. from the Tulane University School of Business.
16
PROPOSAL II RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Audit Committee has appointed Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public
accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2006. Services provided to the Company and
its subsidiaries by Ernst & Young LLP in fiscal 2005 are described below under Audit and Non-Audit
Fees.
Representatives of Ernst & Young LLP will be present at the Annual Meeting. They will have
the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and we expect that they will be
available to respond to questions.
Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP requires the affirmative vote of a
majority of the votes cast by the holders of the shares of common stock voting in person or by
proxy at the Annual Meeting. If the Companys stockholders do not ratify the appointment of Ernst
& Young LLP, the Audit Committee will reconsider the appointment and may affirm the appointment or
retain another independent accounting firm. If the appointment is ratified, the Audit Committee
may in the future replace Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm if
it is determined that it is in the Companys best interest to do so.
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote FOR the
ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the independent registered public
accounting firm of the Company for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2006.
Audit and Non-Audit Fees
The following table presents fees for audit, audit-related, tax, and other services rendered
by the Companys principal independent registered public accounting firm, Ernst & Young LLP, for
the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees |
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Audit Fees (1) |
|
$ |
900,874 |
|
|
$ |
932,672 |
|
Audit-Related Fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax Fees (2) |
|
|
297,469 |
|
|
|
833,559 |
|
All Other Fees (3) |
|
|
1,395 |
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,199,738 |
|
|
$ |
1,767,731 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Audit fees for 2005 and 2004 include fees associated with the audit of our consolidated
financial statements, the audit of our internal control over financial reporting, reviews of
our quarterly financial statements, assistance with filing certain registration statements
with the SEC, and assistance with certain financing transactions. |
|
(2) |
|
Tax fees for 2005 and 2004 include $213,513 and $537,594, respectively, for federal and state
tax compliance, including $88,513 and $94,093, respectively, for assistance with tax
examinations. The remaining tax fees during 2005 and 2004 ($83,956 and $295,965,
respectively) were for services consisting primarily of federal and state tax planning. |
|
(3) |
|
All other fees for 2005 and 2004 consist of access fees to EY Online, an on-line information
and communication tool available to Ernst & Young audit clients. |
17
Pre-Approval of Audit and Non-Audit Fees
Consistent with Section 202 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and SEC rules regarding auditor
independence, our Audit Committee pre-approves all audit and non-audit services provided by our
independent registered public accounting firm. In 2004 and 2005, the Audit Committee approved all
fees disclosed under tax, audit-related (none), and all other fees by Ernst & Young in
accordance with applicable rules.
The Audit Committees Auditor Independence Policy prohibits our independent registered public
accounting firm from performing certain non-audit services and any services that have not been
approved by the Audit Committee in accordance with the policy and the Section 202 rules. The
policy establishes procedures to ensure that proposed services are brought before the Audit
Committee for consideration and, if determined by the Committee to be consistent with the auditors
independence, approved prior to initiation, and to ensure that the Audit Committee has adequate
information to assess the types of services being performed and fee amounts on an ongoing basis.
The Audit Committee has delegated to its Chair, Mr. Jacobi, the authority to pre-approve services
between meetings when necessary, provided that the full Committee is apprised of the services
approved at its next regularly scheduled meeting.
18
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Information Concerning Executive Officers Who Are Not Directors
Kenneth A. Bouldin, age 63, has served as an Executive Vice President and as our Chief Development
Officer since February 2003. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Bouldin was the President of KAB
Associates, Inc., a management consulting company. Mr. Bouldins business experience also includes
founding Econotech, an IT staffing firm, and Econocom, a business that sold and leased new and used
data processing equipment, service as vice president and manager of the Federal Marketing Group of
Comdisco, Inc., and service as Chairman of the Board of Directors and President and Chief Operating
Officer of the Computer Dealers and Lessors Association, which he helped form. Mr. Bouldin also
had a lengthy military career, rising to the rank of Major General and serving as a commanding
general of the 125th Army Reserve Command from 1990 through 1994. Mr. Bouldin graduated cum laude
from the University of Tennessee with a B.S. in Electrical Engineering.
Irving E. Lingo, Jr., age 54, has served as an Executive Vice President and our Chief Financial
Officer and Assistant Secretary since December 2000. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Lingo was
chief financial officer for Bradley Real Estate, Inc., a NYSE listed REIT headquartered in Chicago,
Illinois, and held positions as chief financial officer, chief operating officer, and vice
president, finance for several public and private companies, including Lingerfelt Industrial
Properties, CSX Corporation, and Goodman Segar Hogan, Inc. Mr. Lingo graduated summa cum laude
from Old Dominion University, where he received a B.S. in Business Administration.
G. A. Puryear IV, age 37, has served as an Executive Vice President and as our General Counsel and
Secretary since January 2001. Mr. Puryears business and government experience includes service as
legislative director and counsel for U.S. Senator Bill Frist, as a debate advisor to Vice President
Richard B. Cheney, as counsel on the special investigation of campaign finance abuses during the
1996 elections conducted by the U.S. Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs, which was chaired by
U.S. Senator Fred Thompson, and private practice with Farris, Warfield & Kanaday, PLC (now Stites &
Harbison, PLLC) in Nashville, TN. Mr. Puryear also served as a law clerk for the Honorable Rhesa
Hawkins Barksdale, U.S. Circuit Judge for the Fifth Circuit in Jackson, Mississippi. Mr. Puryear
graduated from Emory University with a major in Political Science and received his J.D. from the
University of North Carolina.
Richard P. Seiter, age 57, has served as the Companys Executive Vice President and Chief
Corrections Officer since January 2005. Prior to joining the Company and since 1999, Mr. Seiter
served as an Associate Professor in the Department of Sociology and Criminal Justice at Saint Louis
University, St. Louis, Missouri. Mr. Seiter has served as a Warden with the Federal Bureau of
Prisons (Federal Correctional Institution, Greenville, Illinois) and as Director of the Ohio
Department of Rehabilitation and Correction. Mr. Seiter has authored two textbooks on corrections,
Corrections: An Introduction (2005) and Correctional Administration: Integrating Theory
and Practice (2002), both published by Prentice Hall, and has served as Editor of Corrections
Management Quarterly. Mr. Seiter holds a B.S. in Business Administration and a Ph.D. in Public
Administration from Ohio State University.
David M. Garfinkle, age 38, has served as our Vice President, Finance and Controller since February
2001. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Garfinkle was the vice president and controller for
Bradley Real Estate, Inc. and a senior audit manager at KPMG Peat Marwick LLP. Mr. Garfinkle
graduated summa cum laude from St. Bonaventure University in 1989 with a B.B.A. degree.
Todd J. Mullenger, age 47, has served as our Vice President, Treasurer since January 2001 and
served as the Vice President, Finance from August 2000 to January 2001. Mr. Mullenger also served
as the vice
19
president of finance of our predecessor company and affiliated operating company prior
to the completion of our restructuring during the fourth quarter of 2000. Mr. Mullengers previous
experience includes service as assistant vice president-finance of Service Merchandise Company,
Inc. and as an audit manager with Arthur Andersen LLP. Mr. Mullenger graduated from the University
of Iowa in 1981 with a B.B.A. degree and later earned an M.B.A. from Middle Tennessee State
University.
20
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Report of the Compensation Committee
The following Report of the Compensation Committee and the performance graph included
elsewhere in this Proxy Statement do not constitute soliciting material and should not be deemed
filed or incorporated by reference into any other Company filing under the Securities Act of 1933
or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent the Company specifically incorporates
this Report or the performance graph by reference therein.
Compensation Governance
The Compensation Committee is responsible for setting the compensation of the Companys
executive officers, overseeing the Boards evaluation of the performance of our executive officers,
and administering the Companys equity-based incentive plans, among other things. The Committee
undertakes these responsibilities pursuant to a written charter adopted by the Board, which may be
viewed in full on the Companys website, www.correctionscorp.com (under Corporate Governance on
the Investor page). Compensation for executive officers also is reviewed by the full Board.
The compensation of officers below the Executive Vice President level is set by the
Executive Vice President to whom the officer reports in accordance with the corporate compensation
plan established by our Chief Executive Officer in consultation with the Committee. This plan is
generally consistent with the compensation philosophies and strategies described in this Proxy
Statement.
Compensation Philosophy
The Compensation Committees fundamental goal in setting executive compensation is to maintain
executive leadership for the Company that will execute our business strategy, uphold our Company
values, and deliver results to our stockholders. The Companys executive compensation also should
represent good value to our stockholders. Accordingly, the Committee seeks to develop compensation
strategies that will attract, retain, and motivate highly qualified and high-performing executives
through compensation that is
|
|
|
Performance-based: A significant component of compensation should be
determined based on whether or not the Company meets performance criteria that in
the view of the Board are indicative of the Companys success. |
|
|
|
|
Stockholder-aligned: Equity incentives should be used to align the
interests of our executive officers with those of our stockholders. |
|
|
|
|
Fair: Compensation should take into account compensation among
similarly situated companies, our success relative to peer companies, and our
overall Company pay scale. |
Evaluation of Compensation Program
The Compensation Committee annually evaluates the components and the levels of our executive
compensation to ensure that they are consistent with meeting the goals outlined above. The
Committee also periodically undertakes a more comprehensive re-evaluation of the Companys
compensation approach in order to take into account the Companys development and to adjust to
changes in the industry and regulatory environments within which we operate. In 2004, the
Committee engaged PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC), the Committees outside compensation advisor,
to assist it with
21
an analysis of the Companys executive compensation practices. This analysis was completed in the
first quarter of 2005.
The results of this review did not change the fundamental compensation philosophy (described
above) or basic compensation structure applied in prior years; however, the Committee, with PwCs
assistance, determined that certain changes to its approach were advisable based on the Companys
current financial position and strategic goals, as well as developments in corporate governance and
compensation design.
The Committee determined that the Company and management had achieved a significant turnaround
since 2001, as reflected in significant stock price gains and improvements in the Companys balance
sheet and overall financial condition. Accordingly, the Committee adjusted the peer group used for
comparative purposes to better reflect the Companys current operational and strategic positions,
moving from a peer group composed of government services, real estate investment trust/real estate
industry, and turnaround companies to a business services peer group composed of a broader array
of companies. The Committee adjusted the Companys salaries and bonus plans to be more
competitive within the revised peer group and to better reflect our current strategic goals. In
addition, the Committee adopted an approach to equity incentives that involves a mix of stock
options with time-based vesting and restricted stock with time- and performance-based vesting.
Compensation for 2005
The primary components of the 2005 program were cash compensation, consisting of a mix of base
salary and incentive cash bonuses, and equity incentives, consisting of stock options with
time-based vesting and restricted stock with time- and performance-based vesting.
Cash Compensation. Base salaries provide a secure level of guaranteed cash compensation.
Each year the Committee reviews and approves a revised annual salary plan for our executive
officers, taking into account several factors, including prior year salary, responsibilities,
tenure, performance, salaries paid by comparable companies for comparable positions, the Companys
overall pay scale, and the Companys recent financial performance. As part of the review completed
in 2005, the Committee determined that base salary generally should be set at the 50th
percentile of the Companys peer group, with the potential for total compensation (which includes
incentive cash and equity compensation, discussed below) to equal or exceed the 75th percentile of
the peer group based on the achievement of performance targets set by the Committee. This process
resulted in the base salaries stated in the Summary Compensation Table included in this Proxy
Statement.
Incentive cash bonuses provide the potential for significantly enhanced cash compensation
based on the extent to which performance targets set in advance by the Committee are met. For the
2005 bonus plan, the Committee established performance objectives that would reward senior
management for growth in earnings per share (EPS). The plan was structured to provide
incremental increases in bonus (as a percentage of base salary) starting from a baseline EPS level
(no bonus), through a significant target EPS level (75% of base salary), and up to a superior EPS
level (a maximum of 150% of base salary). The Committee reserved discretion to make adjustments to
the EPS figure used for bonus calculation purposes (bonus EPS) for events outside the ordinary
course, such as charges incurred for financing transactions approved by the Board, to ensure that
bonus EPS would reflect a true comparison with the baseline EPS (diluted EPS for 2004) and that
incentive cash bonuses would accurately reflect the extent to which the Company achieved the
performance objectives set by the Committee. For purposes of calculating bonus EPS for 2005, the
Committee adjusted diluted EPS for 2005 to exclude the impact of the following: transaction
expenses associated with the Board-approved debt refinancing and recapitalization transactions
completed in 2005; the after-tax interest expense benefit associated with those same
22
transactions; the non-cash compensation expense associated with the Companys Board-approved
accelerated stock option vesting in December 2005; and income tax benefits associated with certain
special items. Using this process, and based on the Companys performance in 2005, the 2005 bonus
plan resulted in the bonuses stated in the Summary Compensation Table, which represent
approximately 100% of each Named Executive Officers base salary.
Equity Incentives. As stated above, the Committee determined that a strategy utilizing a mix
of stock options with time-based vesting and restricted stock with time- and performance-based
vesting would be in the best interest of stockholders. The Committee believes this strategy allows
it to set optimal combinations of time- and performance-based vesting and annual and longer term
performance goals. The Committee also believes this approach will reduce the dilutive impact of
equity grants to management compared to equity grants consisting solely of stock options. More
specifically, the mix consists of (i) non-qualified stock options granted at fair market value with
time vesting over three years (options granted to officers below the Executive Vice President level
vest over four years) and (ii) restricted stock with vesting over time and based upon achieving
performance objectives established by the Committee (achievable in increments or in the aggregate
over a three year period), with no vesting to occur below a base performance level and incremental
50%, 75%, and 100% percent vesting as established earnings per share objectives are achieved.
Shares are subject to vesting in one-third (1/3) increments over three years in accordance with
annual and cumulative performance targets. Thus, for example, if the year 1 target is not met, the
first one-third (1/3) of shares will not vest at the end of year 1; however, such shares may vest
along with the second one-third (1/3) of shares if the cumulative target for year 2 is met. The
value of the restricted stock granted to our Named Executive Officers is included in the Summary
Compensation Table and the option grants for the Named Executive Officers are set forth in the
table titled Option Grants in Last Fiscal Year included in this Proxy Statement.
As disclosed in December 2005, the Compensation Committee determined that it was in the best
interests of the Company and its stockholders to accelerate the vesting of all outstanding and
unvested options previously awarded to our employees, including our executive officers, effective
December 30, 2005. The purpose of the accelerated vesting was to enable the Company to avoid
recognizing compensation expense associated with the options in future periods as required by
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123R, Share Based Payment, which the
Company was required to adopt January 1, 2006. In order to prevent unintended benefits to our
executive officers and other employees, resale restrictions were imposed on shares obtained through
the accelerated vesting process. The restrictions prevent the sale of any shares acquired from
the exercise of an accelerated option prior to the earlier of (i) the original vesting date of the
option or (ii) the individuals termination of employment. The shares subject to resale
restrictions at December 31, 2005 with respect to the Named Executive Officers are disclosed in a
footnote to the Aggregate Option Exercises in the Last Fiscal Year and Fiscal Year-End Option
Values table in this Proxy Statement.
Other Benefits. The Company matches a percentage of eligible employee contributions to our
qualified 401(k) Plan. The matching contributions are made in cash and vest over a five-year
period. The Company also has a nonqualified deferred compensation plan covering our executive
officers and key employees who elect not to participate in our qualified 401(k) Plan. Under the
terms of the plan, participants are allowed to defer up to 50% of their annual base salary and 100%
of their incentive cash bonus each plan year. The Company, in its discretion, may make matching
contributions to the plan. Currently, we make matching contributions equal to 100% of amounts
deferred up to 5% of total cash compensation. Any compensation deferred and matching
contributions, if any, earn a return determined based on the return received by the Company on
certain investments designated as a funding mechanism for meeting our obligations under the plan.
Participants are 100% vested in amounts deferred under the plan and earnings on those amounts,
while each matching contribution and earnings on those amounts historically have vested over a
three year period. Based on amendments to our deferred compensation
23
plan authorized in January 2005, matching contributions after January 2005 vest in the same
manner as matching contributions under our 401(k) Plan, as described above. Participants generally
may elect to receive benefits accrued under the plan at any time after the end of the fifth year
following the deferral or upon termination of employment, subject to certain restrictions (e.g.,
certain key employees, including the Named Executive Officers, are subject to a six month waiting
period).
The Company has paid relocation expenses, either in the form of reimbursement or a lump sum
payment, to the Named Executive Officers who have relocated to Nashville, Tennessee in order to
assume their positions with the Company, and has made tax gross up payments to such officers to
cover income tax associated with such payments. Relocation and tax gross up payments made to the
Named Executive Officers are disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table in this Proxy Statement.
The Named Executive Officers are also eligible for benefits generally available to and on the same
terms as the Companys employees who are exempt for purposes of the Fair Labor Standards Act,
including health insurance, disability insurance, dental insurance, and life insurance. Pursuant
to their employment agreements, the Named Executive Officers are also eligible for reimbursement
for certain civic and professional memberships that are approved in advance by the Company.
Compensation for 2006
Based on the Compensation Committees most recent annual review of our executive compensation,
consistent with the compensation philosophy and program outlined above, and continued input from
PwC, the base salaries and equity incentive awards for 2006 for the Named Executive Officers and
any other person expected to be a named executive officer for 2006 are set forth below in the table
titled 2006 Salaries and Equity Grants.
Compensation of Chief Executive Officer and President
Our Chief Executive Officer and President, John D. Ferguson, is compensated pursuant to and
participates in the same executive compensation plans applicable to our other executive officers,
as described above. For 2005, Mr. Fergusons total cash compensation (inclusive of salary, bonus,
and Company contributions under our Executive Deferred Compensation Plan) was $1,412,854. Mr.
Ferguson had a base salary of $683,100. In addition, Mr. Ferguson was granted non-qualified stock
options to purchase 45,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $39.16 per share,
which was the stocks market value at the time of the grant, and 17,100 shares of restricted stock
with a value of $669,636 based on the grant date market value.
24
Tax Deductibility of Compensation
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 limits the deductibility on the Companys
tax return of compensation over $1.0 million to the Chief Executive Officer or any of the other
four most highly compensated executive officers serving at the end of the fiscal year unless, in
general, the compensation is paid pursuant to a plan which is performance-related,
non-discretionary, and has been approved by our stockholders. The Compensation Committees actions
with respect to Section 162(m) in 2005 were to make every reasonable effort to ensure that
compensation was deductible to the extent permitted while simultaneously providing appropriate
rewards for performance. The Committee intends to structure performance based compensation awarded
in the future to executive officers who may be subject to Section 162(m) in a manner that satisfies
the relevant requirements. The Committee, however, reserves the authority to award non-deductible
compensation as deemed appropriate. Further, because of ambiguities and uncertainties as to the
application and interpretation of Section 162(m) and related regulations, no assurance can be given
that compensation intended to satisfy the requirements for deductibility under Section 162(m) will
in fact do so.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Submitted by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors: |
|
|
|
Joseph V. Russell, Chair
|
|
John R. Horne |
|
|
John D. Correnti
|
|
John R. Prann, Jr. |
25
Summary Compensation Table
The following table summarizes the compensation paid with respect to the three fiscal years
ended December 31, 2005, 2004, and 2003 to (i) John D. Ferguson, our Chief Executive Officer and
President and Vice-Chairman of the Board of Directors and (ii) our other four most highly
compensated executive officers who were serving as of December 31, 2005 (collectively, the Named
Executive Officers).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
Restricted |
|
Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual |
|
Stock |
|
Underlying |
|
All Other |
Name and Principal Position |
|
Year |
|
Salary |
|
Bonus |
|
Comp.(1) |
|
Awards(2) |
|
Options (#) |
|
Comp. |
John D. Ferguson |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
$ |
677,769 |
|
|
$ |
677,727 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
669,636 |
|
|
|
45,000 |
|
|
$ |
57,358 |
(3) |
Chief Executive Officer, |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
653,077 |
|
|
|
469,399 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92,726 |
|
|
|
57,450 |
(3) |
President, and Vice- |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
534,615 |
|
|
|
495,921 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92,726 |
|
|
|
49,673 |
(3) |
Chairman of the Board |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Irving E. Lingo, Jr. |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
338,885 |
|
|
|
338,864 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
334,818 |
|
|
|
22,500 |
|
|
|
74,299 |
(4) |
Executive Vice President, |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
339,257 |
|
|
|
243,841 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,173 |
|
|
|
31,553 |
(3) |
Chief Financial Officer, and |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
314,753 |
|
|
|
291,802 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,173 |
|
|
|
25,703 |
(3) |
Assistant Secretary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kenneth A. Bouldin |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
293,077 |
|
|
|
293,059 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
334,818 |
|
|
|
22,500 |
|
|
|
24,440 |
(3) |
Executive Vice President |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
272,308 |
|
|
|
195,721 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
and Chief
Development Officer |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
212,307 |
|
|
|
198,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
(5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard P. Seiter(6) |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
270,000 |
|
|
|
269,983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
669,636 |
|
|
|
45,000 |
|
|
|
109,758 |
(7) |
Executive Vice President |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Chief Corrections Officer |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. A. Puryear IV |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
223,077 |
|
|
|
223,063 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
275,295 |
|
|
|
18,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice President, |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
203,034 |
|
|
|
145,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,586 |
|
|
|
|
|
General Counsel, |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
179,265 |
|
|
|
166,696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,586 |
|
|
|
|
|
and Secretary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
During the periods covered, the Company has reimbursed certain of the Named Executive
Officers for items such as airline club and fitness center memberships in amounts below the
threshold required to be disclosed in this column under current proxy rules. For 2005, the
aggregate reimbursement for such items for the Named Executive Officers ranged from $0 to
$1,543. |
|
(2) |
|
The amounts shown in this column represent the dollar value of the grant of restricted stock
based on the fair market value of the Companys common stock on the date of grant. All grants
of restricted stock were made under the Companys Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Incentive
Plan and are subject to the individual award agreements, the form of which was previously
filed with the SEC. |
|
(3) |
|
All Other Comp. in these years consists of contributions to our Executive Deferred
Compensation Plan with respect to Mr. Ferguson, Mr. Lingo and Mr. Bouldin. |
26
|
|
|
(4) |
|
All Other Comp. in 2005 with respect to Mr. Lingo consists of $31,287 in contributions to
our Executive Deferred Compensation Plan and $43,012 in tax gross-up payments associated with
moving allowances paid to Mr. Lingo in 2001. |
|
(5) |
|
All Other Comp. in 2003 with respect to Mr. Bouldin represents a moving allowance paid to
Mr. Bouldin. |
|
(6) |
|
Mr. Seiter was hired by the Company on January 3, 2005. |
|
(7) |
|
All Other Comp. in 2005 with respect to Mr. Seiter consists of $13,801 in contributions to
our Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, $68,990 in moving allowances paid to, or on behalf
of, Mr. Seiter, and $26,967 in tax gross-up payments associated with such moving allowances. |
Option Grants in Last Fiscal Year
The following table sets forth the options to purchase shares of common stock granted to the
Named Executive Officers during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Grants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potential Realized Value |
|
|
Number of |
|
Percentage of Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at Assumed Rates of |
|
|
Securities |
|
Options Granted to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Price Appreciation For |
|
|
Underlying Options |
|
Employees in Fiscal |
|
Exercise |
|
Expiration |
|
Option Term(1) |
Name |
|
Granted (#)(2) |
|
Year |
|
Price(3) |
|
Date |
|
5% |
|
10% |
John D. Ferguson |
|
|
45,000 |
|
|
|
15.8 |
% |
|
$ |
39.16 |
|
|
|
2-16-2015 |
|
|
$ |
1,108,238 |
|
|
$ |
2,808,493 |
|
Irving E. Lingo, Jr. |
|
|
22,500 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
% |
|
|
39.16 |
|
|
|
2-16-2015 |
|
|
|
554,119 |
|
|
|
1,404,246 |
|
Kenneth A. Bouldin |
|
|
22,500 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
% |
|
|
39.16 |
|
|
|
2-16-2015 |
|
|
|
554,119 |
|
|
|
1,404,246 |
|
Richard P. Seiter |
|
|
45,000 |
|
|
|
15.8 |
% |
|
|
39.16 |
|
|
|
2-16-2015 |
|
|
|
1,108,238 |
|
|
|
2,808,493 |
|
G. A. Puryear IV |
|
|
18,500 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
% |
|
|
39.16 |
|
|
|
2-16-2015 |
|
|
|
455,609 |
|
|
|
1,154,603 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The dollar amounts under these columns are the result of calculations at the 5% and 10%
rates set by the SEC and are not intended to forecast future appreciation, if any, of the
price of our common stock. |
|
(2) |
|
Each of the options vest one-third each year, beginning on the first anniversary of the grant
date. |
|
(3) |
|
Each of the options has an exercise price equal to the fair market value of our common stock
at the time of the grant. |
Aggregate Option Exercises in the Last Fiscal Year and Fiscal Year-End Option Values
The following table sets forth information regarding the exercise of stock options during the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 and value of unexercised options to purchase shares of common
stock held on December 31, 2005 by the Named Executive Officers.
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities Underlying |
|
Value of Unexercised |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
Unexercised Options Held at |
|
In-The-Money Options at |
|
|
Acquired on |
|
Value |
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
December 31, 2005(1) |
Name |
|
Exercise |
|
Realized |
|
Exercisable |
|
Unexercisable(2) |
|
Exercisable |
|
Unexercisable |
John D. Ferguson |
|
|
120,000 |
|
|
$ |
3,659,376 |
|
|
|
1,045,335 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
28,525,707 |
|
|
|
|
|
Irving E. Lingo, Jr. |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
793,583 |
|
|
|
313,651 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,614,118 |
|
|
|
|
|
Kenneth A. Bouldin |
|
|
73,333 |
|
|
|
1,633,669 |
|
|
|
114,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,057,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
Richard P. Seiter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
261,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
G. A. Puryear IV |
|
|
21,750 |
|
|
|
665,252 |
|
|
|
167,325 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,466,893 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
These amounts were calculated by subtracting the exercise price from the market price of
the underlying common stock as of December 31, 2005. The market value of the common stock was
$44.97 per share as of Friday, December 30, 2005 (the last trading date in 2005) based on the
closing price per share on the NYSE. |
|
(2) |
|
As previously announced on December 9, 2005, the Board, through the Compensation Committee,
accelerated the vesting of all outstanding and unvested options previously awarded to our
employees effective December 30, 2005. However, in order to prevent unintended benefits to
our executive officers and other employees, resale restrictions were imposed on shares
obtained through the accelerated vesting process, which restrictions prevent the sale of any
shares acquired from the exercise of an accelerated option prior to the earlier of (i) the
original vesting date of the option or (ii) the individuals termination of employment.
Accordingly, although such shares are exercisable, the following number of shares were subject
to resale restrictions at December 31, 2005, with respect to the Named Executive Officers: |
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Shares Subject to Resale Restrictions |
John D. Ferguson |
|
|
137,726 |
|
Irving E. Lingo, Jr. |
|
|
73,673 |
|
Kenneth A. Bouldin |
|
|
97,500 |
|
Richard P. Seiter |
|
|
45,000 |
|
G. A. Puryear IV |
|
|
44,086 |
|
2006 Salaries and Equity Grants
The table below sets forth the base salary levels, effective April 1, 2006, and 2006 equity
incentive grants for the Named Executive Officers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Subject to |
|
Exercise |
|
Restricted |
Name |
|
Base Salary |
|
Option Grant |
|
Price (1) |
|
Shares(2) |
John D. Ferguson |
|
$ |
700,000 |
|
|
|
43,000 |
|
|
$ |
42.81 |
|
|
|
15,600 |
|
Irving E. Lingo, Jr. |
|
|
353,500 |
|
|
|
21,500 |
|
|
|
42.81 |
|
|
|
7,800 |
|
Kenneth A. Bouldin |
|
|
310,500 |
|
|
|
21,500 |
|
|
|
42.81 |
|
|
|
7,800 |
|
Richard P. Seiter |
|
|
290,000 |
|
|
|
21,500 |
|
|
|
42.81 |
|
|
|
7,800 |
|
G. A. Puryear IV |
|
|
240,000 |
|
|
|
17,700 |
|
|
|
42.81 |
|
|
|
6,425 |
|
28
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The exercise price per share is equal to the fair market value of the common stock on the
date of the grant, the reported closing price on the NYSE Composite Tape on February 14, 2006. |
|
(2) |
|
The shares of restricted stock are subject to vesting over a three year period upon
satisfaction of certain performance criteria for the fiscal years ending December 31, 2006,
2007, and 2008 as established by the Compensation Committee. No more than one-third of such
shares may vest in the first performance period; however, the performance criteria are
cumulative for the three-year period and are subject to accelerated vesting upon certain
events (death, disability or certain change in control events). |
Employment Agreements and Change in Control Provisions
Employment Agreements
John D. Ferguson. We have an employment agreement with John D. Ferguson that expires on
December 31, 2006 and is subject to automatic one-year renewals unless the Company or Mr. Ferguson
provides notice of non-renewal at least 60 days in advance of expiration of the prior term. The
agreement provides for an annual salary, as well as customary benefits, including life and health
insurance. Mr. Fergusons cash compensation is discussed in more detail above in the Report of the
Compensation Committee.
If Mr. Fergusons employment is terminated without cause, Mr. Ferguson resigns for good
cause, or the agreement is not renewed by the Company upon the expiration of a renewal term, we
generally are required to pay Mr. Ferguson a cash severance payment equal to two times his annual
base salary then in effect, payable in monthly installments for a period of two years following the
termination of employment, as well certain accrued rights, if any, which include prorated bonus
compensation and accrued but unpaid salary. Mr. Ferguson will also continue to be covered under
existing life, medical, disability, and health insurance plans for a period of two years. To the
extent Mr. Ferguson has become vested in any options to purchase shares of our common stock or
other equity securities granted to him prior to the date of termination, Mr. Ferguson will remain
entitled to exercise them in accordance with their terms. Any unvested options will be forfeited.
In the event Mr. Fergusons employment terminates in connection with a change in control,
whether by resignation or otherwise, Mr. Ferguson will be entitled to receive a lump sum cash
payment equal to three times his base salary then in effect, as well as certain tax reimbursement
payments. Mr. Ferguson will also continue to be covered under existing life, medical, disability,
and health insurance plans for a period of two years. In addition, all options to purchase shares
of our common stock or other company equity securities granted prior to the date of termination,
whether vested or unvested, will become immediately vested in accordance with their terms.
Mr. Ferguson is prohibited from competing with the Company during the term of his employment
and for a period of one year following termination of employment. Mr. Ferguson is also subject to
certain confidentiality and non-disclosure provisions during this period.
Other Executive Officers. We also have employment agreements with each of Mr. Bouldin, Mr.
Lingo, Mr. Puryear, and Mr. Seiter. Each of the employment agreements expire on December 31, 2006
and are subject to up to three automatic one-year renewals unless the Company or executive provide
notice of non-renewal at least 60 days in advance of the expiration of a prior term. The
agreements provide for an annual salary, as well as customary benefits, including life and health
insurance, and reimbursement for certain civic and professional memberships that are approved in
advance by the Company.
29
Under each of these agreements, if we terminate the employment of the executive without
cause we generally are required to pay a cash severance amount equal to the executives annual
base salary then in effect, payable in installments in accordance with the terms of the agreements.
In the event of termination in connection with a change in control, whether by resignation or
otherwise, the executive will be entitled to receive a lump sum cash payment equal to 2.99 times
his base salary then in effect, as well as certain tax reimbursement payments, and the employee
will continue to be covered under existing life, medical, disability, and health insurance plans
for a period of one year.
Each of the executives is prohibited from competing with the Company during the term of his
employment and for a period of one year following termination of employment. Each employee is also
subject to certain confidentiality and non-disclosure provisions during this period.
Change in Control Provisions of Stock Incentive Plans
Our 1995 Stock Incentive Plan and our Amended and Restated 1997 Employee Share Incentive Plan
each provide that upon a change-in-control or potential change-in-control, as defined in the
plans, the value of all outstanding share options granted under the plans, to the extent vested,
will be cashed out on the basis of a change-in-control price, which is generally based on the
highest price paid per share of common stock on the NYSE at any time during a 60-day period prior
to the occurrence of the change-in-control event. Certain executive officers have been granted
options to purchase shares of common stock under the 1995 Stock Incentive Plan and under the
Amended and Restated 1997 Employee Share Incentive Plan.
Under our Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, the vesting of all or a portion of
an option, stock appreciation right, or restricted stock award will be accelerated upon a change
in control, as defined in the plan. Certain of our executive officers have been granted options
to purchase shares of common stock under this plan.
30
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL
OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
Ownership of Common Stock
The following table contains information regarding our beneficial ownership of our common
stock as of March 15, 2006 by our directors and executive officers individually and as a group:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
Number of |
|
Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
Shares |
|
Acquirable |
|
|
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Beneficially |
|
Within |
|
Total |
|
Beneficially |
Name of Beneficial Owner |
|
Owned (1) (2) |
|
60 Days(3) |
|
Beneficial Ownership |
|
Owned(4) |
William F. Andrews |
|
|
53,170 |
|
|
|
131,332 |
|
|
|
184,502 |
|
|
|
* |
|
John D. Ferguson |
|
|
195,081 |
|
|
|
764,255 |
|
|
|
959,336 |
|
|
|
2.34 |
% |
Donna M. Alvarado |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,666 |
|
|
|
9,666 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Lucius E. Burch, III |
|
|
403,183 |
|
|
|
27,296 |
|
|
|
430,479 |
|
|
|
1.06 |
% |
John D. Correnti |
|
|
3,708 |
|
|
|
24,000 |
|
|
|
27,708 |
|
|
|
* |
|
John R. Horne |
|
|
6,608 |
|
|
|
17,666 |
|
|
|
24,274 |
|
|
|
* |
|
C. Michael Jacobi |
|
|
16,000 |
|
|
|
24,000 |
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Thurgood Marshall, Jr. |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
13,666 |
|
|
|
15,666 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Charles L. Overby |
|
|
4,300 |
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
16,300 |
|
|
|
* |
|
John R. Prann, Jr. |
|
|
2,008 |
|
|
|
24,000 |
|
|
|
26,008 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Joseph V. Russell |
|
|
54,450 |
|
|
|
29,020 |
|
|
|
83,470 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Henri L. Wedell |
|
|
863,208 |
|
|
|
24,000 |
|
|
|
887,208 |
|
|
|
2.17 |
% |
Kenneth A. Bouldin |
|
|
15,596 |
|
|
|
114,167 |
|
|
|
129,763 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Irving E. Lingo, Jr. |
|
|
15,311 |
|
|
|
278,651 |
|
|
|
293,962 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Richard P. Seiter |
|
|
23,392 |
|
|
|
45,000 |
|
|
|
68,392 |
|
|
|
* |
|
G. A. Puryear IV |
|
|
13,835 |
|
|
|
167,325 |
|
|
|
181,160 |
|
|
|
* |
|
David M. Garfinkle |
|
|
4,933 |
|
|
|
44,800 |
|
|
|
49,733 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Todd J. Mullenger |
|
|
22,292 |
|
|
|
40,700 |
|
|
|
62,992 |
|
|
|
* |
|
All directors and executive
officers as a group (18
persons) |
|
|
1,699,075 |
|
|
|
1,791,544 |
|
|
|
3,490,619 |
|
|
|
8.01 |
% |
|
|
|
* |
|
Represents beneficial ownership of less than 1% of the outstanding shares of our common
stock. |
|
(1) |
|
Except as set forth below, each person in the table has sole voting and
investment power over the shares listed: |
|
|
|
Mr. Andrews Includes 2,000 shares held in an IRA. |
|
|
|
|
Mr. Ferguson Includes 1,151 shares held in our 401(k) Plan and 122,968
shares held by the Ferguson Revocable Living Trust. |
|
|
|
|
Mr. Burch Includes: (i) 23,776 shares owned by the Lucius Burch Family
Foundation and (ii) 792 shares owned by Lucius Burch Sheffield Partners. |
|
|
|
|
Mr. Jacobi Includes 6,000 shares held in an IRA. |
|
|
|
|
Mr. Russell Includes shares owned jointly with his wife. |
|
|
|
|
Mr. Wedell Includes: (i) 498,719 shares owned by Mr. Wedells wife; (ii)
22,463 shares held in an IRA; (iii) 112,489 shares held by the Wedell
Spendthrift Trust; and (iv) 23,000 shares held by The Miller Trust. |
|
(2) |
|
With respect to Mr. Andrews, Mr. Ferguson, Mr. Bouldin, Mr. Lingo, Mr. Seiter,
Mr. Puryear, Mr. Garfinkle, and Mr. Mullenger, includes shares of restricted stock with
performance based vesting, and which therefore is subject to forfeiture if vesting
conditions are not met, as described in
footnote 2 to the table titled 2006 Salaries and Equity Grants in the Executive
Compensation section of this proxy statement.
|
31
|
(3) |
|
Reflects the number of shares that could be purchased upon exercise of stock
options at March 15, 2006 or within 60 days thereafter (other than shares covered by
stock options to be automatically granted to our non-employee directors on the date of
the Annual Meeting under the terms of the Companys Amended and Restated 2000 Stock
Incentive Plan). |
|
|
(4) |
|
The percentage ownership for each stockholder is calculated by dividing (i) the
total number of shares of common stock beneficially owned by the stockholder by (ii)
40,073,650 shares plus any shares of common stock acquirable by that stockholder
(including exercisable stock options) within 60 days after March 15, 2006. |
The following table contains information regarding the only persons who are known to us
to beneficially own greater than 5% of our common stock as of March 15, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
Number of |
|
Shares |
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
Shares |
|
Acquirable |
|
Total |
|
Stock |
|
|
Beneficially |
|
Within |
|
Beneficial |
|
Beneficially |
Name of Beneficial Owner |
|
Owned |
|
60 Days |
|
Ownership |
|
Owned(1) |
Pacific Mezzanine Fund, L.P. |
|
|
3,362,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,362,467 |
(2) |
|
|
8.4 |
% |
FMR Corp. |
|
|
2,761,901 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,761,901 |
(3) |
|
|
6.9 |
% |
Capital Research and Management Company |
|
|
2,150,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,150,000 |
(4) |
|
|
5.4 |
% |
RS Investment Management Co., LLC |
|
|
3,779,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,779,090 |
(5) |
|
|
9.4 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Percentage calculated based on 40,073,650 shares of common stock outstanding as of
March 15, 2006. |
|
(2) |
|
Based on our issuance on March 1, 2005 of an aggregate of 3,362,467 shares of
our common stock to PMI Mezzanine Fund, L.P. in connection with the mandatory
conversion of our 4.0% convertible subordinated note due 2007 in the principal amount
of $30,000,000 held by PMI, as previously disclosed in a Current Report on Form 8-K
filed by us on March 2, 2005. The principal address of PMI Mezzanine Fund, L.P. is 610
Newport Center Drive, Suite 1100, Newport Beach, California 92660. |
|
(3) |
|
Based upon information contained in Amendment No. 1 to Schedule 13G filed with
the SEC on February 14, 2006 by FMR Corp. jointly with its affiliates Edward C.
Johnson, III and Fidelity Management & Research Company. FMR Corp. and/or its
affiliates have sole voting power over 646,460 shares and sole investment power over
2,761,901 shares. The principal address of FMR Corp. is 82 Devonshire Street, Boston,
Massachusetts 02109. |
|
(4) |
|
Based upon information contained in a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on
February 10, 2006 by Capital Research and Management Company. Capital Research and
Management Company has sole voting power over 2,150,000 shares and sole investment
power over 2,150,000 shares. The principal address of Capital Research and Management
Company is 333 South Hope Street, Los Angeles, California 90071. |
|
(5) |
|
Based on information contained in a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February
10, 2006 by RS Investment Management Co., LLC, jointly with its affiliates RS
Investment Management, L.P. and George R. Hecht, each of which claim shared voting and
dispositive power over all reported shares. The principal address of RS Investment
Management Co., LLC is 388 Market Street, Suite 1700, San Francisco, CA 94111-5311. |
32
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our executive officers and
directors to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC and the NYSE. Based
on our records and other information, all Section 16(a) filing requirements were satisfied by our
executive officers and directors in 2005, with the exception of the following: due to
administrative errors, Forms 4 reporting the acquisition by each of John D. Correnti, John R.
Horne, and John R. Prann of 147 shares of common stock on March 30, 2005 pursuant to elections
under our Non-Employee Directors Compensation Plan to receive portions of their director fees in
stock in lieu of cash were filed late on April 19, 2005.
33
PERFORMANCE GRAPH
Our common stock is currently traded on the NYSE under the symbol CXW. On March 31, 2006,
the last reported sales price of our common stock was $45.20 per share. Effective May 18, 2001, we
completed a reverse stock split of our common stock at a ratio of one-for-ten. The following graph
provides a comparison of the cumulative total stockholder return on the common stock compared to
the cumulative total return of the Standard & Poors 500 Index (the S&P 500 Index) and an index
consisting of direct competitors (the Peer Group Index). We believe that the companies included
in the Peer Group Index generally possess assets, liabilities, and operations more similar to ours
than companies comprising other publicly-available indices. The graph assumes an initial
investment of $100, a reinvestment of distributions and/or dividends, and the actual increase or
decrease of the market value of the common stock relative to the initial investment of $100. The
comparisons in this graph are required by the SEC and are not intended to forecast or be indicative
of possible or future performance of the common stock. All values related to the shares of common
stock are on a post-reverse stock split basis.
COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN AMONG CORRECTIONS
CORPORATION OF AMERICA, THE S & P 500 INDEX, AND A PEER GROUP*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2000 |
|
2001 |
|
2002 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
CCA |
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
539.85 |
|
|
|
498.84 |
|
|
|
838.57 |
|
|
|
1,176.56 |
|
|
|
1,308.03 |
|
S&P 500 |
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
88.12 |
|
|
|
68.64 |
|
|
|
88.33 |
|
|
|
97.94 |
|
|
|
102.75 |
|
Peer Group |
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
220.85 |
|
|
|
154.54 |
|
|
|
263.56 |
|
|
|
301.26 |
|
|
|
264.58 |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
The Peer Group includes Avalon Correctional Services, Inc., Cornell Companies, Inc. and the Geo Group, Inc. (formerly
Wackenhut Corrections Corp.). Correctional Services Corp. (CSC), which has been included in our Peer Group in prior
years, has been excluded because CSC was acquired by the GEO Group, Inc. on November 4, 2005 pursuant to an agreement and
plan of merger dated July 14, 2005. |
34
PROXY
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To Be Held May 11, 2006
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The undersigned hereby appoint(s) John D. Ferguson and Irving E. Lingo, Jr., and each of them
with full power of substitution and revocation, as proxies of the undersigned, and hereby
authorize(s) them to represent and to vote, as designated, all of the voting common stock of
Corrections Corporation of America, a Maryland corporation (the Company), held by the undersigned
on Tuesday, March 28, 2006, at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company to be held on
Thursday, May 11, 2006, at 10:00 a.m., local time, at the Companys corporate headquarters, 10
Burton Hills Boulevard, Nashville, Tennessee, and at any adjournments or postponements thereof.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE NOMINEES FOR
DIRECTOR LISTED BELOW AND FOR PROPOSAL 2 BELOW. PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND RETURN PROMPTLY IN THE
ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. PLEASE MARK YOUR VOTE IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS SHOWN HERE. þ
1. |
|
Election of Directors. |
|
[ ] |
|
FOR all nominees |
|
|
[ ] |
|
WITHHOLD AUTHORITY to vote for all nominees |
Nominees: William F. Andrews, John D. Ferguson, Donna M. Alvarado, Lucius E. Burch, III,
John D. Correnti, John R. Horne, C. Michael Jacobi, Thurgood Marshall, Jr., Charles L.
Overby, John R. Prann, Jr., Joseph V. Russell and Henri L. Wedell.
|
[ ] |
|
For all nominees except for the following: |
2. |
|
Ratification of the appointment by our Audit Committee of Ernst & Young LLP as our
independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2006. |
[ ] FOR [ ] AGAINST [ ] ABSTAIN
3. |
|
In their discretion, the proxies are authorized to vote upon any other business as may
properly come before the meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof. |
PLEASE FULLY COMPLETE, DATE, PROPERLY SIGN AND RETURN THIS PROXY PROMPTLY.
This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein by the undersigned
stockholder(s). If no direction is made, this proxy will be voted in accordance with the
recommendations of the Board of Directors.
|
|
|
To change the address on your account, please check the box at right
and indicate your new address in the address space above. Please
note that changes to the registered name(s) on the account may not be
submitted via this method.
|
|
[ ] |
|
|
|
Please check here if you plan to attend the meeting.
|
|
[ ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature of Stockholder:
|
|
|
|
Date: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature of Stockholder:
|
|
|
|
Date: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: Please sign exactly as your name or names appear on this Proxy. When shares are held
jointly, each holder should sign. When signing as executor, administrator, attorney, trustee or
guardian, please give full title as such. If the signer is a corporation, please sign full
corporate name by duly authorized officer, giving full title as such. If a signer is a
partnership, please sign in partnership name by authorized person.