þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
MARYLAND (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
62-1763875 (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 55,395 | $ | 64,901 | ||||
Restricted cash |
11,531 | 11,284 | ||||||
Investments |
60,822 | 19,014 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $1,768 and $2,258, respectively |
188,739 | 176,560 | ||||||
Deferred tax assets |
16,386 | 32,488 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
22,043 | 15,884 | ||||||
Total current assets |
354,916 | 320,131 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net |
1,742,441 | 1,710,794 | ||||||
Investment in direct financing lease |
15,908 | 16,322 | ||||||
Goodwill |
15,246 | 15,246 | ||||||
Other assets |
25,819 | 23,820 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 2,154,330 | $ | 2,086,313 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
$ | 145,831 | $ | 141,090 | ||||
Income taxes payable |
2,637 | 1,435 | ||||||
Current portion of long-term debt |
331 | 11,836 | ||||||
Current liabilities of discontinued operations |
604 | 1,774 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
149,403 | 156,135 | ||||||
Long-term debt, net of current portion |
976,113 | 963,800 | ||||||
Deferred tax liabilities |
15,409 | 12,087 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
38,326 | 37,660 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
1,179,251 | 1,169,682 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies |
||||||||
Common stock $0.01 par value; 80,000 shares authorized; 40,261 and
39,694 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2006 and December 31,
2005, respectively |
403 | 397 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
1,512,106 | 1,506,184 | ||||||
Deferred compensation |
| (5,563 | ) | |||||
Retained deficit |
(537,430 | ) | (584,387 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders equity |
975,079 | 916,631 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 2,154,330 | $ | 2,086,313 | ||||
1
For the Three Months | For the Six Months | |||||||||||||||
Ended June 30, | Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||||||
REVENUE: |
||||||||||||||||
Management and other |
$ | 325,171 | $ | 289,205 | $ | 640,149 | $ | 569,120 | ||||||||
Rental |
1,049 | 984 | 2,085 | 1,956 | ||||||||||||
326,220 | 290,189 | 642,234 | 571,076 | |||||||||||||
EXPENSES: |
||||||||||||||||
Operating |
238,814 | 223,597 | 474,848 | 438,347 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative |
15,961 | 13,587 | 30,338 | 26,125 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
16,326 | 14,780 | 32,029 | 28,817 | ||||||||||||
271,101 | 251,964 | 537,215 | 493,289 | |||||||||||||
OPERATING INCOME |
55,119 | 38,225 | 105,019 | 77,787 | ||||||||||||
OTHER EXPENSES: |
||||||||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
14,552 | 15,544 | 29,678 | 32,972 | ||||||||||||
Expenses associated with debt refinancing and
recapitalization transactions |
| 237 | 982 | 35,269 | ||||||||||||
Other (income) expenses |
(102 | ) | 173 | (114 | ) | 49 | ||||||||||
14,450 | 15,954 | 30,546 | 68,290 | |||||||||||||
INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS
BEFORE INCOME TAXES |
40,669 | 22,271 | 74,473 | 9,497 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense |
(15,041 | ) | (7,835 | ) | (27,516 | ) | (3,380 | ) | ||||||||
INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS |
25,628 | 14,436 | 46,957 | 6,117 | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes |
| 427 | | (193 | ) | |||||||||||
NET INCOME |
$ | 25,628 | $ | 14,863 | $ | 46,957 | $ | 5,924 | ||||||||
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE: |
||||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
$ | 0.64 | $ | 0.37 | $ | 1.18 | $ | 0.17 | ||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes |
| 0.01 | | (0.01 | ) | |||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 0.64 | $ | 0.38 | $ | 1.18 | $ | 0.16 | ||||||||
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE: |
||||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
$ | 0.63 | $ | 0.36 | $ | 1.15 | $ | 0.15 | ||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes |
| 0.01 | | | ||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 0.63 | $ | 0.37 | $ | 1.15 | $ | 0.15 | ||||||||
2
For the Six Months | ||||||||
Ended June 30, | ||||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 46,957 | $ | 5,924 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
32,029 | 29,003 | ||||||
Amortization of debt issuance costs and other non-cash interest |
2,326 | 2,705 | ||||||
Expenses associated with debt refinancing and
recapitalization transactions |
982 | 35,269 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
18,758 | 1,340 | ||||||
Income tax benefit of equity compensation |
(7,360 | ) | 4,067 | |||||
Other expenses |
(117 | ) | 34 | |||||
Non-cash equity compensation |
3,212 | 1,322 | ||||||
Other non-cash items |
458 | 547 | ||||||
Changes in assets and liabilities, net: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable, prepaid expenses and other assets |
(18,747 | ) | (26,562 | ) | ||||
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities |
4,718 | 18,010 | ||||||
Income taxes payable |
8,562 | (20,149 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
91,778 | 51,510 | ||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Expenditures for acquisitions, development, and expansions |
(42,454 | ) | (25,022 | ) | ||||
Expenditures for other capital improvements |
(22,192 | ) | (18,086 | ) | ||||
(Increase) decrease in restricted cash |
(116 | ) | 1,931 | |||||
Purchases of investments |
(41,808 | ) | (130 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sale of assets |
51 | 887 | ||||||
Increase in other assets |
(391 | ) | (23 | ) | ||||
Payments received on direct financing leases and notes receivable |
367 | 318 | ||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(106,543 | ) | (40,125 | ) | ||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of debt |
150,000 | 375,000 | ||||||
Scheduled principal repayments |
(97 | ) | (438 | ) | ||||
Other principal repayments |
(148,950 | ) | (360,135 | ) | ||||
Payment of debt issuance and other refinancing and related costs |
(3,973 | ) | (35,940 | ) | ||||
Income tax benefit of equity compensation |
7,360 | | ||||||
Purchase and retirement of common stock |
(6,979 | ) | | |||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
7,898 | 5,141 | ||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
5,259 | (16,372 | ) | |||||
NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
(9,506 | ) | (4,987 | ) | ||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period |
64,901 | 50,938 | ||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period |
$ | 55,395 | $ | 45,951 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: |
||||||||
Cash paid during the period for: |
||||||||
Interest (net of amounts capitalized of $2,818 and $2,264 in 2006
and 2005, respectively) |
$ | 28,059 | $ | 30,867 | ||||
Income taxes |
$ | 3,044 | $ | 15,465 | ||||
3
Additional | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock | Paid-in | Deferred | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Par Value | Capital | Compensation | Retained Deficit | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
Balance as of
December 31, 2005 |
39,694 | $ | 397 | $ | 1,506,184 | $ | (5,563 | ) | $ | (584,387 | ) | $ | 916,631 | |||||||||||
Comprehensive income: |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | | | 46,957 | 46,957 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
| | | | 46,957 | 46,957 | ||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock |
| | 25 | | | 25 | ||||||||||||||||||
Retirement of common stock |
(167 | ) | (2 | ) | (6,977 | ) | | | (6,979 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Amortization of deferred
compensation, net of forfeitures |
(30 | ) | | 2,131 | | | 2,131 | |||||||||||||||||
Income tax benefit of equity
compensation |
| | 7,360 | | | 7,360 | ||||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock grant |
164 | 2 | (2 | ) | | | | |||||||||||||||||
Reclassification of deferred
compensation on nonvested stock
upon adoption of SFAS 123R |
| | (5,563 | ) | 5,563 | | | |||||||||||||||||
Compensation of unvested stock
options |
| | 1,056 | | | 1,056 | ||||||||||||||||||
Stock options exercised |
600 | 6 | 7,892 | | | 7,898 | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance as of
June 30, 2006 |
40,261 | $ | 403 | $ | 1,512,106 | $ | | $ | (537,430 | ) | $ | 975,079 | ||||||||||||
4
Additional | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock | Paid-in | Deferred | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Par Value | Capital | Compensation | Retained Deficit | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
Balance as of
December 31, 2004 |
35,415 | $ | 354 | $ | 1,451,885 | $ | (1,736 | ) | $ | (634,509 | ) | $ | 815,994 | |||||||||||
Comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | | | 5,924 | 5,924 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
| | | | 5,924 | 5,924 | ||||||||||||||||||
Conversion of subordinated
notes |
3,362 | 34 | 29,944 | | | 29,978 | ||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock |
| | 34 | | | 34 | ||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of deferred
compensation, net of
forfeitures |
(7 | ) | | (106 | ) | 1,394 | | 1,288 | ||||||||||||||||
Income tax benefit of equity
compensation |
| | 4,067 | | | 4,067 | ||||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock grant |
197 | 2 | 6,994 | (6,996 | ) | | | |||||||||||||||||
Stock options exercised |
402 | 4 | 5,137 | | | 5,141 | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance as of
June 30, 2005 |
39,369 | $ | 394 | $ | 1,497,955 | $ | (7,338 | ) | $ | (628,585 | ) | $ | 862,426 | |||||||||||
5
1. | ORGANIZATION AND OPERATIONS | |
As of June 30, 2006, Corrections Corporation of America, a Maryland corporation (together with its subsidiaries, the Company), owned 42 correctional, detention and juvenile facilities, three of which are leased to other operators. As of June 30, 2006, the Company operated 63 facilities, including 39 facilities that it owned, located in 19 states and the District of Columbia. The Company was also constructing two additional correctional facilities in Eloy, Arizona, one that was completed during July 2006 and the other that is expected to be completed during the second half of 2007. | ||
The Company specializes in owning, operating and managing prisons and other correctional facilities and providing inmate residential and prisoner transportation services for governmental agencies. In addition to providing the fundamental residential services relating to inmates, the Companys facilities offer a variety of rehabilitation and educational programs, including basic education, religious services, life skills and employment training, and substance abuse treatment. These services are intended to reduce recidivism and to prepare inmates for their successful re-entry into society upon their release. The Company also provides health care (including medical, dental and psychiatric services), food services and work and recreational programs. | ||
The Companys website address is www.correctionscorp.com. The Company makes its Form 10-K, Form 10-Q, Form 8-K, and Section 16 reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, available on its website, free of charge, as soon as reasonably practicable after these reports are filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC). | ||
2. | BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES | |
The accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by the Company and, in the opinion of management, reflect all normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of results for the unaudited interim periods presented. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted. The results of operations for the interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results to be obtained for the full fiscal year. Reference is made to the audited financial statements of the Company included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K as of and for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the 2005 Form 10-K) with respect to certain significant accounting and financial reporting policies as well as other pertinent information of the Company. |
6
Reclassifications have been made to certain 2005 balance sheet amounts to conform with the 2006 presentation. | ||
3. | ACCOUNTING FOR STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION | |
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standard Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123R), which is a revision of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS 123). SFAS 123R supersedes Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (APB 25) and amends Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 95, Statement of Cash Flows. Generally, the approach in SFAS 123R is similar to the approach described in SFAS 123. However, SFAS 123R requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the income statement based on their fair values. Pro forma disclosure is no longer an alternative. | ||
The Company adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123R on January 1, 2006 using the modified prospective method. The modified prospective method requires compensation cost to be recognized beginning with the effective date (a) based on the requirements of SFAS 123R for all share-based payments granted after the effective date and (b) based on the requirements of SFAS 123 for all awards granted to employees prior to the effective date of SFAS 123R that remain unvested on the effective date. | ||
Effective December 30, 2005, the Companys board of directors approved the acceleration of the vesting of outstanding options previously awarded to executive officers and employees under its Amended and Restated 1997 Employee Share Incentive Plan and its Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Incentive Plan. As a result of the acceleration, approximately 980,000 unvested options became exercisable, 45% of which would have vested in February 2006 under the original terms. All of the unvested options were in-the-money on the effective date of acceleration with a range of exercise prices from $15.40 to $39.50 per share. | ||
The purpose of the accelerated vesting of stock options was to enable the Company to avoid recognizing compensation expense associated with these options in future periods as required by SFAS 123R, estimated at the date of acceleration to be $3.8 million in 2006, $2.0 million in 2007, and $0.5 million in 2008. In order to prevent unintended benefits to the holders of these stock options, the Company imposed resale restrictions to prevent the sale of any shares acquired from the exercise of an accelerated option prior to the original vesting date of the option. The resale restrictions automatically expire upon the individuals termination of employment. All other terms and conditions applicable to such options, including the exercise prices, remained unchanged. As a result of the acceleration, the Company recognized a non-cash, pre-tax charge of $1.0 million in the fourth quarter of 2005 for the estimated value of the stock options that would have otherwise been forfeited. | ||
At June 30, 2006, the Company has equity incentive plans under which, among other things, incentive and non-qualified stock options are granted to certain employees and |
7
non-employee directors of the Company by the compensation committee of the Companys board of directors. The options are generally granted with exercise prices equal to the market value at the date of grant. Vesting periods for options recently granted to employees generally range from three to four years. Options granted to non-employee directors vest at the date of grant. The term of such options is ten years from the date of grant. | ||
The weighted average fair value of options granted during the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 was $15.02 and $13.33, respectively. The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions: |
For the Six Months | ||||||||
Ended June 30, | ||||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Expected dividend yield |
0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | ||||
Expected stock price volatility |
25.2 | % | 26.9 | % | ||||
Risk-free interest rate |
4.7 | % | 4.1 | % | ||||
Expected life of options |
6 years | 6 years |
The Company estimates expected stock price volatility based on actual historical changes in the market value of the Companys stock. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield with a term that is consistent with the expected life of the stock options. The expected life of stock options is based on the Companys historical experience and is calculated separately for groups of employees that have similar historical exercise behavior. | ||
As previously described herein, the Companys board of directors approved the acceleration of the vesting effective December 30, 2005 of all outstanding stock options previously awarded to the Companys executive officers and employees. Stock options outstanding at June 30, 2006, are summarized below (in thousands, except per share data and years): |
Weighted- Average | Weighted-Average | |||||||||||||||
Exercise Price of | Remaining | Aggregate Intrinsic | ||||||||||||||
No. of options | options | Contractual Term | Value | |||||||||||||
Outstanding at December 31,
2005 |
3,329 | $ | 25.86 | |||||||||||||
Granted |
271 | 43.82 | ||||||||||||||
Exercised |
(600 | ) | 13.14 | |||||||||||||
Cancelled |
(70 | ) | 101.59 | |||||||||||||
Outstanding at June 30, 2006 |
2,930 | $ | 28.34 | 6.3 | $ | 62,698 | ||||||||||
Exercisable at June 30, 2006 |
2,716 | $ | 27.20 | 6.0 | $ | 62,030 | ||||||||||
The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value (the difference between the Companys average stock price during the first six months of 2006 and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money options) that would have been received by the option holders had all option holders |
8
exercised their options on June 30, 2006. This amount changes based on the fair market value
of the Companys stock. Total intrinsic value of options exercised during the six months
ended June 30, 2006 was $18.8 million. |
||
Nonvested stock option transactions relating to the Companys incentive and non-qualified stock option plans as of June 30, 2006 and changes during the six months ended June 30, 2006 are summarized below (in thousands, except exercise prices): |
Weighted | ||||||||
Number of | average exercise | |||||||
options | price per option | |||||||
Nonvested at December 31, 2005 |
| $ | | |||||
Granted |
271 | $ | 43.82 | |||||
Cancelled |
(17 | ) | $ | 42.81 | ||||
Vested |
(40 | ) | $ | 49.66 | ||||
Nonvested at June 30, 2006 |
214 | $ | 42.80 | |||||
The Company currently has $3.0 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to stock options that is expected to be recognized over a remaining weighted-average period of 3.0 years. Notwithstanding the aforementioned accelerated vesting of all options on December 30, 2005 to avoid future compensation charges and a change in the Companys historical business practices in 2005 with respect to awarding stock-based employee compensation by reducing the amount of stock options being issued and issuing restricted common stock to many employees who have historically been issued stock options largely as a result of the pending adoption of SFAS 123R, as a result of adopting Statement 123R on January 1, 2006, the Companys income from continuing operations before income taxes and net income for the six months ended June 30, 2006, are $1.1 million and $0.7 million lower, respectively, than if it had continued to account for share-based compensation under APB 25. Basic and diluted earnings per share for the six months ended June 30, 2006 are both $0.02 lower than if the Company had continued to account for share-based compensation under APB 25. See Note 8 for further discussion of the compensation charges associated with the issuance of restricted common stock. | ||
On November 10, 2005, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 123(R)-3, Transition Election Related to Accounting for the Tax Effects of Share-Based Payment Awards (the FSP). The FSP provides that companies may elect to use a specified short-cut method to calculate the historical pool of windfall tax benefits upon adoption of SFAS 123R. The Company elected to use the short-cut method when SFAS 123R was adopted on January 1, 2006. Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123R, the Company reported all tax benefits of equity compensation as operating cash flows in the consolidated statement of cash flows. In accordance with SFAS 123R, for the six months ended June 30, 2006 the presentation of the statement of cash flows has changed from prior periods to report tax benefits from equity compensation of $7.4 million resulting from tax deductions in excess of the compensation cost recognized for those equity awards (excess tax benefits) as financing cash flows. |
9
Prior to adoption of SFAS 123R on January 1, 2006, the Company accounted for equity incentive plans under the recognition and measurement principles of APB 25. As such, no employee compensation cost for the Companys stock options is reflected in net income prior to January 1, 2006, except for $1.0 million recognized in the fourth quarter of 2005 as a result of the accelerated vesting of outstanding options on December 30, 2005 as previously described herein. The following table illustrates the effect on net income and income per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 assuming the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123 to stock-based employee compensation (in thousands, except per share data). |
For the Three | For the Six | |||||||
Months Ended | Months Ended | |||||||
June 30, 2005 | June 30, 2005 | |||||||
As Reported: |
||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
$ | 14,436 | $ | 6,117 | ||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes |
427 | (193 | ) | |||||
Net income |
$ | 14,863 | $ | 5,924 | ||||
Pro Forma: |
||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
$ | 13,086 | $ | 3,866 | ||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes |
427 | (193 | ) | |||||
Net income |
$ | 13,513 | $ | 3,673 | ||||
As Reported: |
||||||||
Basic earnings per share: |
||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
$ | 0.37 | $ | 0.17 | ||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes |
0.01 | (0.01 | ) | |||||
Net income |
$ | 0.38 | $ | 0.16 | ||||
As Reported: |
||||||||
Diluted earnings per share: |
||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
$ | 0.36 | $ | 0.15 | ||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes |
0.01 | | ||||||
Net income |
$ | 0.37 | $ | 0.15 | ||||
Pro Forma: |
||||||||
Basic earnings per share: |
||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
$ | 0.34 | $ | 0.11 | ||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes |
0.01 | (0.01 | ) | |||||
Net income |
$ | 0.35 | $ | 0.10 | ||||
Pro Forma: |
||||||||
Diluted earnings per share: |
||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
$ | 0.33 | $ | 0.09 | ||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes |
0.01 | | ||||||
Net income |
$ | 0.34 | $ | 0.09 | ||||
The effect of applying SFAS 123 for disclosing compensation costs under such pronouncement may not be representative of the effects on reported net income for future years. | ||
Refer to Note 8 for further information regarding additional stock-based compensation awarded during 2006 and 2005. |
10
4. | GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS | |
Goodwill was $15.2 million as of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 and was associated with the facilities the Company manages but does not own. This goodwill was established in connection with the acquisitions of two service companies during 2000. During the first quarter of 2005, the Company recognized $138,000 of goodwill impairment resulting from the pending termination of the Companys contract to manage the David L. Moss Criminal Justice Center located in Tulsa, Oklahoma. This charge is included in income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes, in the accompanying statement of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2005. | ||
The components of the Companys amortized intangible assets and liabilities are as follows (in thousands): |
June 30, 2006 | December 31, 2005 | |||||||||||||||
Gross Carrying | Accumulated | Gross Carrying | Accumulated | |||||||||||||
Amount | Amortization | Amount | Amortization | |||||||||||||
Contract acquisition costs |
$ | 873 | $ | (856 | ) | $ | 873 | $ | (855 | ) | ||||||
Customer list |
765 | (382 | ) | 765 | (328 | ) | ||||||||||
Contract values |
(35,688 | ) | 20,834 | (35,688 | ) | 19,294 | ||||||||||
Total |
$ | (34,050 | ) | $ | 19,596 | $ | (34,050 | ) | $ | 18,111 | ||||||
Contract acquisition costs and the customer list are included in other non-current assets, and contract values are included in other non-current liabilities in the accompanying balance sheets. Contract values are amortized using the interest method. Amortization income, net of amortization expense, for intangible assets and liabilities during the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 was $1.1 million and $1.1 million, respectively, while amortization income, net of amortization expense, for intangible assets and liabilities during the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 was $2.3 million and $2.1 million, respectively. Interest expense associated with the amortization of contract values for the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 was $0.4 million and $0.5 million, respectively, while interest expense associated with the amortization of contract values for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 was $0.8 million and $0.9 million, respectively. Estimated amortization income, net of amortization expense, for the remainder of 2006 and the five succeeding fiscal years is as follows (in thousands): |
2006 (remainder) |
$ | 2,276 | ||
2007 |
4,552 | |||
2008 |
4,552 | |||
2009 |
3,095 | |||
2010 |
2,534 | |||
2011 |
134 |
11
5. | FACILITY OPERATIONS | |
During the first quarter of 2006, the Company re-opened its 1,440-bed North Fork Correctional Facility in Sayre, Oklahoma with a small population of inmates from the state of Vermont. Although the Company expects to accommodate additional inmate populations from the state of Vermont at the North Fork Correctional Facility due to that states overcrowding, the facility was re-opened in anticipation of additional inmate population needs from various existing state and federal customers. In June 2006, the Company entered into a new agreement with the state of Wyoming to house up to 600 of the states male medium-security inmates at the North Fork Correctional Facility. The terms of the contract include an initial two-year period and may be renewed upon mutual agreement. Prior to its re-opening, this facility had been vacant since the third quarter of 2003, when all of the Wisconsin inmates housed at the facility were transferred in order to satisfy a contractual provision mandated by the state of Wisconsin. | ||
In April 2006, the Company modified an agreement with Williamson County, Texas to house non-criminal detainees from the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) under an inter-governmental service agreement between Williamson County and the ICE. The agreement enables the ICE to accommodate non-criminal aliens being detained for deportation at the Companys 512-bed T. Don Hutto Residential Center in Taylor, Texas. The Company originally announced an agreement in December 2005 to house up to 600 male detainees for the ICE. However, for various reasons the initial intake of detainees originally scheduled to occur in February 2006 was delayed. The modified agreement, which was effective beginning May 8, 2006, provides for an indefinite term and a fixed monthly payment based on the 512-bed capacity of the facility. | ||
In July 2006, the Company entered into a new agreement with Stewart County, Georgia to house detainees from ICE under an inter-governmental service agreement between Stewart County and ICE. The agreement will enable ICE to accommodate detainees at the Companys 1,524-bed Stewart Detention Center in Lumpkin, Georgia. The agreement between Stewart County and the Company is effective through December 31, 2011, and provides for an indefinite number of renewal options. The Company expects to begin receiving ICE detainees at the Stewart facility on or about October 1, 2006 and expects that ICE will substantially occupy the facility sometime during 2007. | ||
6. | DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS | |
The results of operations, net of taxes, and the assets and liabilities of discontinued operations have been reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements as discontinued operations in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets for all periods presented. | ||
During March 2005, the Company received notification from the Tulsa County Commission in Oklahoma that, as a result of a contract bidding process, the County elected to have the Tulsa County Sheriffs Office manage the 1,440-bed David L. Moss Criminal Justice Center. The Companys contract expired on June 30, 2005. |
12
Accordingly, the Company transferred operation of the facility to the Tulsa County Sheriffs Office on July 1, 2005. | ||
The following table summarizes the results of operations for this facility for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 (amounts in thousands): |
For the Three Months | For the Six Months | |||||||||||||||
Ended June 30, | Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||||||
REVENUE: |
||||||||||||||||
Managed-only |
$ | | $ | 5,638 | $ | | $ | 10,681 | ||||||||
EXPENSES: |
||||||||||||||||
Managed-only |
| 4,972 | | 10,804 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
| 23 | | 186 | ||||||||||||
| 4,995 | | 10,990 | |||||||||||||
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS) |
| 643 | | (309 | ) | |||||||||||
OTHER INCOME: |
||||||||||||||||
Gain on disposal of assets |
| 15 | | 15 | ||||||||||||
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME
TAXES |
| 658 | | (294 | ) | |||||||||||
Income tax (expense) benefit |
| (231 | ) | | 101 | |||||||||||
INCOME (LOSS) FROM
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS,
NET OF TAXES |
$ | | $ | 427 | $ | | $ | (193 | ) | |||||||
The assets and liabilities of the discontinued operations presented in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets are as follows (amounts in thousands): |
June 30, 2006 | December 31, 2005 | |||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Accounts receivable |
$ | | $ | | ||||
Total current assets |
$ | | $ | | ||||
LIABILITIES |
||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
$ | 604 | $ | 1,774 | ||||
Total current liabilities |
$ | 604 | $ | 1,774 | ||||
13
7. | DEBT | |
Debt outstanding as of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 consists of the following (in thousands): |
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Senior Bank Credit Facility: |
||||||||
Term Loan E Facility, with quarterly principal payments of
varying amounts with unpaid balance originally due in March
2008; interest payable periodically at variable interest rates. The
interest rate was 6.0% at December 31, 2005. This loan was
paid-off in connection with issuance of the 6.75% Senior Notes
in January 2006. |
$ | | $ | 138,950 | ||||
Revolving Loan, principal due at maturity in March 2006; interest
payable periodically at variable interest rates. The interest rate
was 5.9% at December 31, 2005. This facility was replaced with
a new revolving credit facility during the first quarter of 2006,
as
further described hereafter. |
| 10,000 | ||||||
New Revolving Credit Facility, principal due at maturity in February
2011; interest payable periodically at variable interest rates. |
| | ||||||
7.5% Senior Notes, principal due at maturity in May 2011; interest
payable semi-annually in May and November at 7.5%. |
250,000 | 250,000 | ||||||
7.5% Senior Notes, principal due at maturity in May 2011; interest
payable semi-annually in May and November at 7.5%. These notes were
issued with a $2.3 million premium, of which $1.4
million and $1.5 million was unamortized at June 30, 2006
and December 31, 2005, respectively. |
201,403 | 201,548 | ||||||
6.25% Senior Notes, principal due at maturity in March 2013; interest
payable semi-annually in March and September at 6.25%. |
375,000 | 375,000 | ||||||
6.75% Senior Notes, principal due at maturity in January 2014;
interest payable semi-annually in January and July at 6.75%. |
150,000 | | ||||||
Other |
41 | 138 | ||||||
976,444 | 975,636 | |||||||
Less: Current portion of long-term debt |
(331 | ) | (11,836 | ) | ||||
$ | 976,113 | $ | 963,800 | |||||
Senior Bank Credit Facility. As of December 31, 2005, the Companys senior secured bank credit facility (the Senior Bank Credit Facility) was comprised of a $139.0 million term loan expiring March 31, 2008 (the Term Loan E Facility) and a revolving loan (the Revolving Loan) with a capacity of up to $125.0 million, including a $75.0 million subfacility for letters of credit, expiring March 31, 2006. On April 18, 2005, the Company completed an amendment to the Senior Bank Credit Facility that resulted in a reduction to the interest rates applicable to the term loan portion from 2.25% over the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) to 1.75% over LIBOR and a reduction to the interest rates applicable to the Revolving Loan from 3.50% over LIBOR to 1.50% over LIBOR, while the fees associated with the unused portion of the Revolving Loan were reduced from 0.50% to 0.375%. The base rate |
14
margin applicable to the term loan portion was reduced to 0.75% from 1.25% and the base rate margin applicable to the Revolving Loan was reduced to 0.50% from 2.50%. | ||
In connection with a substantial prepayment in March 2005 with net proceeds from the issuance of the 6.25% Senior Notes (as defined hereafter), along with cash on hand, the Company amended the Senior Bank Credit Facility to permit the incurrence of additional unsecured indebtedness to be used for the purpose of purchasing, through a tender offer, the 9.875% Senior Notes (as defined hereafter), prepaying a portion of the then outstanding term loan portion of the Senior Bank Credit Facility (the Term Loan D Facility), and paying the related tender premium, fees, and expenses incurred in connection therewith. The tender offer for the 9.875% Senior Notes and pay-down of the Term Loan D Facility resulted in expenses associated with refinancing transactions of $35.0 million during the first quarter of 2005, consisting of a tender premium paid to the holders of the 9.875% Senior Notes who tendered their notes to the Company at a price of 111% of par, estimated fees and expenses associated with the tender offer, and the write-off of existing deferred loan costs associated with the purchase of the 9.875% Senior Notes and lump sum pay-down of the Term Loan D Facility. | ||
During January 2006, in connection with the sale and issuance of the 6.75% Senior Notes (as defined hereafter), the Company used the net proceeds to completely pay-off the outstanding balance of the Term Loan E Facility, after repaying the outstanding $10.0 million balance on the Revolving Loan in January 2006 with cash on hand. Additionally, in February 2006, the Company reached an agreement with a group of lenders to enter into a new $150.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility with a five-year term (the New Revolving Credit Facility). The New Revolving Credit Facility was used to replace the existing Revolving Loan, including any outstanding letters of credit issued thereunder, which totaled $36.9 million as of June 30, 2006. The Company incurred a pre-tax charge of approximately $1.0 million during the first quarter of 2006 for the write-off of existing deferred loan costs associated with the retirement of the Revolving Loan and pay-off of the Term Loan E Facility. | ||
The New Revolving Credit Facility has a $10.0 million sublimit for swingline loans and a $100.0 million sublimit for the issuance of standby letters of credit. The Company has an option to increase the availability under the New Revolving Credit Facility by up to $100.0 million (consisting of revolving credit, term loans, or a combination of the two) subject to, among other things, the receipt of commitments for the increased amount. Interest on the New Revolving Credit Facility is based on either a base rate plus a margin ranging from 0.00% to 0.50% or a LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 0.75% to 1.50%. The applicable margin rates are subject to adjustment based on the Companys leverage ratio. Effective May 18, 2006, interest rates on the New Revolving Credit Facility were reduced to a base rate or a LIBOR plus a margin of 1.00% from a base rate plus a margin of 0.25% or a LIBOR plus a margin of 1.25% as a result of an improvement to the Companys leverage ratio pursuant to the terms of the New Revolving Credit Facility. |
15
The New Revolving Credit Facility is secured by a pledge of all of the capital stock of the Companys domestic subsidiaries, 65% of the capital stock of the Companys foreign subsidiaries, all of the Companys accounts receivable, and all of the Companys deposit accounts. | ||
The New Revolving Credit Facility requires the Company to meet certain financial covenants, including, without limitation, a maximum total leverage ratio and a minimum interest ratio coverage. In addition, the New Revolving Credit Facility contains certain covenants which, among other things, limit the incurrence of additional indebtedness, investments, payment of dividends, transactions with affiliates, asset sales, acquisitions, capital expenditures, mergers and consolidations, prepayments and modifications of other indebtedness, liens and encumbrances, and other matters customarily restricted in such agreements. In addition, the New Revolving Credit Facility is subject to certain cross-default provisions with terms of the Companys other indebtedness. | ||
$250 Million 9.875% Senior Notes. Interest on the $250.0 million aggregate principal amount of the Companys 9.875% unsecured senior notes issued in May 2002 (the 9.875% Senior Notes) accrued at the stated rate and was payable semi-annually on May 1 and November 1 of each year. The 9.875% Senior Notes were scheduled to mature on May 1, 2009. As previously described herein, the 9.875% Senior Notes were purchased through a tender offer by the Company during the first quarter of 2005. | ||
$250 Million 7.5% Senior Notes. Interest on the $250.0 million aggregate principal amount of the Companys 7.5% unsecured senior notes issued in May 2003 (the $250 Million 7.5% Senior Notes) accrues at the stated rate and is payable semi-annually on May 1 and November 1 of each year. The $250 Million 7.5% Senior Notes are scheduled to mature on May 1, 2011. At any time on or before May 1, 2006, the Company could have redeemed up to 35% of the notes with the net proceeds of certain equity offerings, as long as 65% of the aggregate principal amount of the notes remained outstanding after the redemption. The Company may redeem all or a portion of the notes on or after May 1, 2007. Redemption prices are set forth in the indenture governing the $250 Million 7.5% Senior Notes. The $250 Million 7.5% Senior Notes are guaranteed on an unsecured basis by all of the Companys domestic subsidiaries. | ||
$200 Million 7.5% Senior Notes. Interest on the $200.0 million aggregate principal amount of the Companys 7.5% unsecured senior notes issued in August 2003 (the $200 Million 7.5% Senior Notes) accrues at the stated rate and is payable semi-annually on May 1 and November 1 of each year. However, the notes were issued at a price of 101.125% of the principal amount of the notes, resulting in a premium of $2.25 million, which is amortized as a reduction to interest expense over the term of the notes. The $200 Million 7.5% Senior Notes were issued under the existing indenture and supplemental indenture governing the $250 Million 7.5% Senior Notes. | ||
$375 Million 6.25% Senior Notes. As previously described herein, on March 23, 2005, the Company completed the sale and issuance of $375.0 million aggregate principal amount of its 6.25% unsecured senior notes (the 6.25% Senior Notes) in a private placement to qualified institutional buyers pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. During April 2005, the Company filed a registration |
16
statement with the SEC, which the SEC declared effective May 4, 2005, to exchange the 6.25% Senior Notes for a new issue of identical debt securities registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Proceeds from the original note offering, along with cash on hand, were used to purchase, through a cash tender offer, all of the 9.875% Senior Notes, to pay-down $110.0 million of the then outstanding Term Loan D Facility portion of the Senior Bank Credit Facility, and to pay fees and expenses in connection therewith. The Company capitalized approximately $7.5 million of costs associated with the issuance of the 6.25% Senior Notes. | ||
Interest on the 6.25% Senior Notes accrues at the stated rate and is payable on March 15 and September 15 of each year. The 6.25% Senior Notes are scheduled to mature on March 15, 2013. At any time on or before March 15, 2008, the Company may redeem up to 35% of the notes with the net proceeds of certain equity offerings, as long as 65% of the aggregate principal amount of the notes remains outstanding after the redemption. The Company may redeem all or a portion of the notes on or after March 15, 2009. Redemption prices are set forth in the indenture governing the 6.25% Senior Notes. | ||
$150 Million 6.75% Senior Notes. During January 2006, the Company completed the sale and issuance of $150.0 million aggregate principal amount of its 6.75% unsecured senior notes (the 6.75% Senior Notes) pursuant to a prospectus supplement under an effective shelf registration statement that was filed by the Company with the SEC on January 17, 2006. The Company used the net proceeds from the sale of the 6.75% Senior Notes to prepay the $139.0 million balance outstanding on the term loan indebtedness under the Companys Senior Bank Credit Facility, to pay fees and expenses, and for general corporate purposes. The Company reported a charge of $0.9 million during the first quarter of 2006 in connection with the prepayment of the term portion of the Senior Bank Credit Facility. The Company capitalized approximately $3.0 million of costs associated with the issuance of the 6.75% Senior Notes. | ||
Interest on the 6.75% Senior Notes accrues at the stated rate and is payable on January 31 and July 31 of each year. The 6.75% Senior Notes are scheduled to mature on January 31, 2014. At any time on or before January 31, 2009, the Company may redeem up to 35% of the notes with the net proceeds of certain equity offerings, as long as 65% of the aggregate principal amount of the notes remains outstanding after the redemption. The Company may redeem all or a portion of the notes on or after January 31, 2010. Redemption prices are set forth in the indenture governing the 6.75% Senior Notes. | ||
8. | STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY | |
During the six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company issued 163,591 shares of restricted common stock to certain of the Companys employees, with an aggregate value of $7.0 million, including 127,891 restricted shares to employees whose compensation is charged to general and administrative expense and 35,700 restricted shares to employees whose compensation is charged to operating expense. During 2005, the Company issued 197,026 shares of restricted common stock to certain of the Companys employees, with an aggregate value of $7.7 million, including 155,556 restricted shares to employees whose compensation is charged to general and |
17
administrative expense and 41,470 shares to employees whose compensation is charged to operating expense. |
The employees whose compensation is charged to general and administrative expense have historically been issued stock options as opposed to restricted common stock. However, in 2005 the Company made changes to its historical business practices with respect to awarding stock-based employee compensation as a result of, among other reasons, the issuance of SFAS 123R, whereby the Company issued a combination of stock options and restricted common stock to such employees. The Company established performance-based vesting conditions on the restricted stock awarded to the Companys officers and executive officers. Unless earlier vested under the terms of the restricted stock, 83,922 shares issued in 2006 and 107,950 shares issued in 2005 to officers and executive officers are subject to vesting over a three-year period based upon the satisfaction of certain performance criteria. No more than one-third of such shares may vest in the first performance period; however, the performance criteria are cumulative for the three-year period. Because the first performance criteria with respect to the restricted shares issued in 2005 were satisfied, one-third of such shares issued and still outstanding on the date the performance criteria were deemed satisfied, or 35,220 restricted shares, became vested in March 2006. Unless earlier vested under the terms of the restricted stock, the remaining 79,669 shares of restricted stock issued in 2006 and 89,076 shares of restricted stock issued in 2005 to certain other employees of the Company vest during 2009 and 2008, respectively, as long as the employees awarded such shares do not terminate employment prior to the vesting dates. | ||
During 2004 and 2003, the Company issued 52,600 shares and 94,500 shares of restricted common stock, respectively, to certain of the Companys wardens. Each of the aggregate grants was valued at $1.6 million on the date of the award. All of the shares granted during 2003 vested during February 2006, while all of the shares granted during 2004 vest during 2007. Nonvested restricted common stock transactions as of June 30, 2006 and for the six months ended June 30, 2006 are summarized below (in thousands, except per share amounts). |
Shares of | Weighted | |||||||
restricted common | average grant date | |||||||
stock | fair value | |||||||
Nonvested at December 31, 2005 |
318 | $ | 32.11 | |||||
Granted |
164 | $ | 42.81 | |||||
Cancelled |
(31 | ) | $ | 39.23 | ||||
Vested |
(116 | ) | $ | 24.00 | ||||
Nonvested at June 30, 2006 |
335 | $ | 39.51 | |||||
During the three months ended June 30, 2006, the Company expensed $1,140,000, net of forfeitures, relating to restricted common stock ($293,000 of which was recorded in operating expenses and $847,000 of which was recorded in general and administrative expenses), while during the three months ended June 30, 2005, the Company expensed $810,000 net of forfeitures, relating to restricted common stock ($352,000 of which was recorded in operating expenses and $458,000 of which was recorded in general and |
18
administrative expenses). During the six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company expensed $2,131,000, net of forfeitures, relating to restricted common stock ($618,000 of which was recorded in operating expenses and $1,513,000 of which was recorded in general and administrative expenses), while during the six months ended June 30, 2005, the Company expensed $1,288,000, net of forfeitures, relating to restricted common stock ($624,000 of which was recorded in operating expenses and $664,000 of which was recorded in general and administrative expenses). As of June 30, 2006, 334,801 of these shares of restricted stock remained outstanding and subject to vesting. The unrecognized compensation related to these shares was approximately $8.9 million as of June 30, 2006 and is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.2 years. |
9. | EARNINGS PER SHARE | |
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, Earnings Per Share, basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in the earnings of the entity. For the Company, diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net income as adjusted, by the weighted average number of common shares after considering the additional dilution related to convertible subordinated notes, restricted common stock plans, and stock options and warrants. | ||
A reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of the basic earnings per share computation to the numerator and denominator of the diluted earnings per share computation is a follows (in thousands, except per share data): |
For the Three Months | For the Six Months | |||||||||||||||
Ended June 30, | Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||||||
NUMERATOR |
||||||||||||||||
Basic: |
||||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
$ | 25,628 | $ | 14,436 | $ | 46,957 | $ | 6,117 | ||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes |
| 427 | | (193 | ) | |||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 25,628 | $ | 14,863 | $ | 46,957 | $ | 5,924 | ||||||||
Diluted: |
||||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
$ | 25,628 | $ | 14,436 | $ | 46,957 | $ | 6,117 | ||||||||
Interest expense applicable to convertible notes, net of taxes |
| | | 128 | ||||||||||||
Diluted income from continuing operations |
25,628 | 14,436 | 46,957 | 6,245 | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes |
| 427 | | (193 | ) | |||||||||||
Diluted net income |
$ | 25,628 | $ | 14,863 | $ | 46,957 | $ | 6,052 | ||||||||
19
For the Three Months | For the Six Months | |||||||||||||||
Ended June 30, | Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||||||
DENOMINATOR |
||||||||||||||||
Basic: |
||||||||||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
39,833 | 38,909 | 39,684 | 37,729 | ||||||||||||
Diluted: |
||||||||||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
39,833 | 38,909 | 39,684 | 37,729 | ||||||||||||
Effect of dilutive securities: |
||||||||||||||||
Stock options and warrants |
945 | 1,160 | 987 | 1,219 | ||||||||||||
Convertible notes |
| | | 1,096 | ||||||||||||
Restricted stock-based compensation |
86 | 107 | 117 | 91 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average shares and assumed conversions |
40,864 | 40,176 | 40,788 | 40,135 | ||||||||||||
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE: |
||||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
$ | 0.64 | $ | 0.37 | $ | 1.18 | $ | 0.17 | ||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes |
| 0.01 | | (0.01 | ) | |||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 0.64 | $ | 0.38 | $ | 1.18 | $ | 0.16 | ||||||||
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE: |
||||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
$ | 0.63 | $ | 0.36 | $ | 1.15 | $ | 0.15 | ||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes |
| 0.01 | | | ||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 0.63 | $ | 0.37 | $ | 1.15 | $ | 0.15 | ||||||||
10. | COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES | |
Legal Proceedings | ||
General. The nature of the Companys business results in claims and litigation alleging that it is liable for damages arising from the conduct of its employees, inmates or others. The nature of such claims include, but is not limited to, claims arising from employee or inmate misconduct, medical malpractice, employment matters, property loss, contractual claims, and personal injury or other damages resulting from contact with the Companys facilities, personnel or prisoners, including damages arising from a prisoners escape or from a disturbance or riot at a facility. The Company maintains insurance to cover many of these claims, which may mitigate the risk that any single claim would have a material effect on the Companys consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows, provided the claim is one for which coverage is available. The combination of self-insured retentions and deductible amounts means that, in the aggregate, the Company is subject to substantial self-insurance risk. | ||
The Company records litigation reserves related to certain matters for which it is probable that a loss has been incurred and the range of such loss can be estimated. Based upon managements review of the potential claims and outstanding litigation and based upon managements experience and history of estimating losses, management believes a loss in excess of amounts already recognized would not be material to the Companys financial statements. In the opinion of management, there are no pending legal proceedings that would have a material effect on the Companys consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. Any receivable for insurance recoveries is recorded separately from the corresponding litigation reserve, and only if recovery is determined to be probable. Adversarial proceedings and litigation are, |
20
however, subject to inherent uncertainties, and unfavorable decisions and rulings could occur which could have a material adverse impact on the Companys consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows for the period in which such decisions or rulings occur, or future periods. Expenses associated with legal proceedings may also fluctuate from quarter to quarter based on changes in the Companys assumptions, new developments, or by the effectiveness of the Companys litigation and settlement strategies. |
Each of the Companys management contracts and the statutes of certain states require the maintenance of insurance. The Company maintains various insurance policies including employee health, workers compensation, automobile liability, and general liability insurance. These policies are fixed premium policies with various deductible amounts that are self-funded by the Company. Reserves are provided for estimated incurred claims for which it is probable that a loss has been incurred and the range of such loss can be estimated. |
Hardeman County Correctional Facilities Corporation (HCCFC) is a nonprofit, mutual benefit corporation organized under the Tennessee Nonprofit Corporation Act to purchase, construct, improve, equip, finance, own and manage a detention facility located in Hardeman County, Tennessee. HCCFC was created as an instrumentality of Hardeman County to implement the Countys incarceration agreement with the state of Tennessee to house certain inmates. | ||
During 1997, HCCFC issued $72.7 million of revenue bonds, which were primarily used for the construction of a 2,016-bed medium security correctional facility. In addition, HCCFC entered into a construction and management agreement with the Company in order to assure the timely and coordinated acquisition, construction, development, marketing and operation of the correctional facility. | ||
HCCFC leases the correctional facility to Hardeman County in exchange for all revenue from the operation of the facility. HCCFC has, in turn, entered into a management agreement with the Company for the correctional facility. | ||
In connection with the issuance of the revenue bonds, the Company is obligated, under a debt service deficit agreement, to pay the trustee of the bonds trust indenture (the Trustee) amounts necessary to pay any debt service deficits consisting of principal and interest requirements (outstanding principal balance of $54.9 million at June 30, 2006 plus future interest payments). In the event the state of Tennessee, which is currently utilizing the facility to house certain inmates, exercises its option to purchase the correctional facility, the Company is also obligated to pay the difference between principal and interest owed on the bonds on the date set for the redemption of the bonds and amounts paid by the state of Tennessee for the facility plus all other funds on deposit with the Trustee and available for redemption of the bonds. Ownership of the facility reverts to the state of Tennessee in 2017 at no cost. Therefore, the Company does not currently believe the state of Tennessee will exercise its option to purchase the |
21
facility. At June 30, 2006, the outstanding principal balance of the bonds exceeded the purchase price option by $14.5 million. The Company also maintains a restricted cash account of $5.5 million as collateral against a guarantee it has provided for a forward purchase agreement related to the bond issuance. | ||
11. | INCOME TAXES | |
Income taxes are accounted for under the provisions of SFAS 109. SFAS 109 generally requires the Company to record deferred income taxes for the tax effect of differences between book and tax bases of its assets and liabilities. | ||
Deferred income taxes reflect the available net operating losses and the net tax effect of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Realization of the future tax benefits related to deferred tax assets is dependent on many factors, including the Companys past earnings history, expected future earnings, the character and jurisdiction of such earnings, unsettled circumstances that, if unfavorably resolved, would adversely affect utilization of its deferred tax assets, carryback and carryforward periods, and tax strategies that could potentially enhance the likelihood of realization of a deferred tax asset. | ||
The Companys effective tax rate was approximately 37% during both the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, compared with approximately 35% and 36% during the same periods in the prior year. The lower effective tax rates during 2005 resulted from certain tax planning strategies implemented during the fourth quarter of 2004 that were magnified by the recognition of deductible expenses associated with the Companys debt refinancing transactions completed during the first and second quarters of 2005. The Companys overall effective tax rate is estimated based on the Companys current projection of taxable income and could change in the future as a result of changes in these estimates, the implementation of additional tax strategies, changes in federal or state tax rates, changes in tax laws, or changes in state apportionment factors, as well as changes in the valuation allowance applied to the Companys deferred tax assets that are based primarily on the amount of state net operating losses and tax credits that could expire unused. | ||
In July 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (FIN 48), which is an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes (SFAS 109). FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The guidance prescribed in FIN 48 establishes a recognition threshold of more likely than not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination. The measurement attribute of FIN 48 requires that a tax position be measured at the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact that FIN 48 will have on the Companys financial position or results of operations and currently plans to adopt FIN 48 on January 1, 2007. |
22
12. | SEGMENT REPORTING | |
As of June 30, 2006, the Company owned and managed 39 correctional and detention facilities, and managed 24 correctional and detention facilities it did not own. Management views the Companys operating results in two reportable segments: owned and managed correctional and detention facilities and managed-only correctional and detention facilities. The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies in the notes to consolidated financial statements included in the Companys 2005 Form 10-K. Owned and managed facilities include the operating results of those facilities owned and managed by the Company. Managed-only facilities include the operating results of those facilities owned by a third party and managed by the Company. The Company measures the operating performance of each facility within the above two reportable segments, without differentiation, based on facility contribution. The Company defines facility contribution as a facilitys operating income or loss from operations before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. Since each of the Companys facilities within the two reportable segments exhibit similar economic characteristics, provide similar services to governmental agencies, and operate under a similar set of operating procedures and regulatory guidelines, the facilities within the identified segments have been aggregated and reported as one reportable segment. | ||
The revenue and facility contribution for the reportable segments and a reconciliation to the Companys operating income is as follows for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 (dollars in thousands): |
For the Three Months | For the Six Months | |||||||||||||||
Ended June 30, | Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||||||
Revenue: |
||||||||||||||||
Owned and managed |
$ | 234,216 | $ | 203,716 | $ | 459,889 | $ | 400,922 | ||||||||
Managed-only |
87,393 | 81,345 | 173,150 | 160,233 | ||||||||||||
Total management revenue |
321,609 | 285,061 | 633,039 | 561,155 | ||||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Owned and managed |
159,200 | 147,923 | 316,914 | 288,957 | ||||||||||||
Managed-only |
74,145 | 69,567 | 147,436 | 137,958 | ||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
233,345 | 217,490 | 464,350 | 426,915 | ||||||||||||
Facility contribution: |
||||||||||||||||
Owned and managed |
75,016 | 55,793 | 142,975 | 111,965 | ||||||||||||
Managed-only |
13,248 | 11,778 | 25,714 | 22,275 | ||||||||||||
Total facility contribution |
88,264 | 67,571 | 168,689 | 134,240 | ||||||||||||
Other revenue (expense): |
||||||||||||||||
Rental and other revenue |
4,611 | 5,128 | 9,195 | 9,921 | ||||||||||||
Other operating expense |
(5,469 | ) | (6,107 | ) | (10,498 | ) | (11,432 | ) | ||||||||
General and administrative |
(15,961 | ) | (13,587 | ) | (30,338 | ) | (26,125 | ) | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
(16,326 | ) | (14,780 | ) | (32,029 | ) | (28,817 | ) | ||||||||
Operating income |
$ | 55,119 | $ | 38,225 | $ | 105,019 | $ | 77,787 | ||||||||
23
The following table summarizes capital expenditures for the reportable segments for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 (in thousands): |
For the Three Months | For the Six Months | |||||||||||||||
Ended June 30, | Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||||||
Capital expenditures: |
||||||||||||||||
Owned and managed |
$ | 27,241 | $ | 20,637 | $ | 49,156 | $ | 37,095 | ||||||||
Managed-only |
6,508 | 1,260 | 8,322 | 2,217 | ||||||||||||
Corporate and other |
3,300 | 6,398 | 8,385 | 9,786 | ||||||||||||
Total capital expenditures |
$ | 37,049 | $ | 28,295 | $ | 65,863 | $ | 49,098 | ||||||||
The assets for the reportable segments are as follows (in thousands): |
June 30, 2006 | December 31, 2005 | |||||||
Assets: |
||||||||
Owned and managed |
$ | 1,673,926 | $ | 1,672,941 | ||||
Managed-only |
100,481 | 92,101 | ||||||
Corporate and other |
379,923 | 321,271 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 2,154,330 | $ | 2,086,313 | ||||
13. | SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW DISCLOSURE | |
During the six months ended June 30, 2005, $30.0 million of convertible subordinated notes were converted into 3.4 million shares of common stock. As a result, long term debt was reduced by, and common stock and additional paid-in capital were increased by, $30.0 million. | ||
14. | SUBSEQUENT EVENT | |
On August 2, 2006, the Companys Board of Directors declared a 3-for-2 stock split to be effected in the form of a 50% stock dividend on its common stock. The stock dividend will be payable on September 13, 2006, to stockholders of record on September 1, 2006. Each shareholder of record at the close of business on the record date will receive one additional share of the Companys common stock for every two shares of common stock held on that date. Shareholders will receive cash in lieu of fractional shares. The stock split will increase the number of shares of common stock outstanding from approximately 40.3 million to approximately 60.4 million shares. Shares and amounts per share have not been adjusted within these financial statements to reflect the 3-for-2 stock split. |
24
ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS. |
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this report. | ||
This quarterly report on Form 10-Q contains statements as to our beliefs and expectations of the outcome of future events that are forward-looking statements as defined within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements other than statements of current or historical fact contained herein, including statements regarding our future financial position, business strategy, budgets, projected costs and plans, and objectives of management for future operations, are forward-looking statements. The words anticipate, believe, continue, estimate, expect, intend, may, plan, projects, will, and similar expressions, as they relate to us, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the statements made. These include, but are not limited to, the risks and uncertainties associated with: |
| fluctuations in operating results because of changes in occupancy levels, competition, increases in cost of operations, fluctuations in interest rates, and risks of operations; | ||
| changes in the privatization of the corrections and detention industry and the public acceptance of our services; | ||
| our ability to obtain and maintain correctional facility management contracts, including as the result of sufficient governmental appropriations, inmate disturbances, and the timing of the opening of new facilities and the commencement of new management contracts to utilize current available beds and new capacity as development and expansion projects are completed; | ||
| increases in costs to develop or expand correctional facilities that exceed original estimates, or the inability to complete such projects on schedule as a result of various factors, many of which are beyond our control, such as weather, labor conditions, and material shortages, resulting in increased construction costs; | ||
| changes in governmental policy and in legislation and regulation of the corrections and detention industry that adversely affect our business; | ||
| the availability of debt and equity financing on terms that are favorable to us; and | ||
| general economic and market conditions. |
Any or all of our forward-looking statements in this quarterly report may turn out to be inaccurate. We have based these forward-looking statements largely on our current expectations and projections about future events and financial trends that we believe may affect our financial condition, results of operations, business strategy and financial needs. They can be affected by inaccurate assumptions we might make or by known or unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including the risks, uncertainties and assumptions described in Risk Factors disclosed in detail in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) on March 7, 2006 (File No. 001-16109) (the 2005 Form 10-K) and in other reports we file with the SEC from time to time. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. We undertake no obligation to publicly revise these forward-looking statements to reflect events |
25
or circumstances occurring after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained in this report and in the 2005 Form 10-K. |
The Company | ||
As of June 30, 2006, we owned 42 correctional, detention and juvenile facilities, three of which we leased to other operators. As of June 30, 2006, we operated 63 facilities, including 39 facilities that we owned, with a total design capacity of approximately 71,000 beds in 19 states and the District of Columbia. We were also constructing two additional correctional facilities in Eloy, Arizona, one that was completed during July 2006 and the other that is expected to be completed during the second half of 2007. | ||
We specialize in owning, operating, and managing prisons and other correctional facilities and providing inmate residential and prisoner transportation services for governmental agencies. In addition to providing the fundamental residential services relating to inmates, our facilities offer a variety of rehabilitation and education programs, including basic education, religious services, life skills and employment training and substance abuse treatment. These services are intended to reduce recidivism and to prepare inmates for their successful re-entry into society upon their release. We also provide health care (including medical, dental and psychiatric services), food services and work and recreational programs. | ||
Our website address is www.correctionscorp.com. We make our Form 10-K, Form 10-Q, Form 8-K, and Section 16 reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), available on our website, free of charge, as soon as reasonably practicable after these reports are filed with or furnished to the SEC. |
The condensed consolidated financial statements in this report are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. As such, we are required to make certain estimates, judgments, and assumptions that we believe are reasonable based upon the information available. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. A summary of our significant accounting policies is described in our 2005 Form 10-K. The significant accounting policies and estimates which we believe are the most critical to aid in fully understanding and evaluating our reported financial results include the following: | ||
Asset impairments. As of June 30, 2006, we had $1.7 billion in long-lived assets. We evaluate the recoverability of the carrying values of our long-lived assets, other than goodwill, when events suggest that an impairment may have occurred. Such events primarily include, but are not limited to, the termination of a management contract or a significant decrease in inmate populations within a correctional facility we own or manage. In these circumstances, we utilize estimates of undiscounted cash flows to determine if an impairment |
26
27
Owned | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
and | Managed | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Effective Date | Managed | Only | Leased | Incomplete | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
Facilities as of December 31, 2004 |
38 | 25 | 3 | 1 | 67 | |||||||||||||||||||
Expiration of the management
contract for the David L.
Moss
Criminal Justice Center |
July 1, 2005 | | (1 | ) | | | (1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Completion of construction at
the Stewart County
Correctional Facility |
October 10, 2005 | 1 | | | (1 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||
Facilities as of December 31, 2005 |
39 | 24 | 3 | | 66 | |||||||||||||||||||
Facilities as of June 30, 2006 |
39 | 24 | 3 | | 66 | |||||||||||||||||||
28
29
For the Three Months | For the Six Months | |||||||||||||||
Ended June 30, | Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||||||
Revenue per compensated man-day |
$ | 52.51 | $ | 50.31 | $ | 52.28 | $ | 50.10 | ||||||||
Operating expenses per compensated
man-day: |
||||||||||||||||
Fixed expense |
28.19 | 28.86 | 28.52 | 28.92 | ||||||||||||
Variable expense |
9.91 | 9.52 | 9.82 | 9.20 | ||||||||||||
Total |
38.10 | 38.38 | 38.34 | 38.12 | ||||||||||||
Operating margin per compensated man-day |
$ | 14.41 | $ | 11.93 | $ | 13.94 | $ | 11.98 | ||||||||
Operating margin |
27.4 | % | 23.7 | % | 26.7 | % | 23.9 | % | ||||||||
Average compensated occupancy |
94.8 | % | 90.1 | % | 94.3 | % | 89.9 | % | ||||||||
30
31
For the Three Months | For the Six Months | |||||||||||||||
Ended June 30, | Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||||||
Owned and Managed Facilities: |
||||||||||||||||
Revenue per compensated man-day |
$ | 60.68 | $ | 58.61 | $ | 60.42 | $ | 58.47 | ||||||||
Operating expenses per
compensated man-day: |
||||||||||||||||
Fixed expense |
30.46 | 32.24 | 30.99 | 32.31 | ||||||||||||
Variable expense |
10.78 | 10.32 | 10.65 | 9.83 | ||||||||||||
Total |
41.24 | 42.56 | 41.64 | 42.14 | ||||||||||||
Operating margin per
compensated man-day |
$ | 19.44 | $ | 16.05 | $ | 18.78 | $ | 16.33 | ||||||||
Operating margin |
32.0 | % | 27.4 | % | 31.1 | % | 27.9 | % | ||||||||
Average compensated occupancy |
93.9 | % | 86.9 | % | 93.1 | % | 86.2 | % | ||||||||
For the Three Months | For the Six Months | |||||||||||||||
Ended June 30, | Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||||||
Managed Only Facilities: |
||||||||||||||||
Revenue per compensated man-day |
$ | 38.60 | $ | 37.13 | $ | 38.50 | $ | 36.90 | ||||||||
Operating expenses per
compensated man-day: |
||||||||||||||||
Fixed expense |
24.32 | 23.50 | 24.36 | 23.56 | ||||||||||||
Variable expense |
8.43 | 8.25 | 8.43 | 8.21 | ||||||||||||
Total |
32.75 | 31.75 | 32.79 | 31.77 | ||||||||||||
Operating margin per
compensated man-day |
$ | 5.85 | $ | 5.38 | $ | 5.71 | $ | 5.13 | ||||||||
Operating margin |
15.2 | % | 14.5 | % | 14.8 | % | 13.9 | % | ||||||||
Average compensated occupancy |
96.6 | % | 95.7 | % | 96.4 | % | 96.3 | % | ||||||||
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
Estimated remaining | ||||||||||
cost to complete as | ||||||||||
Estimated | of June 30, 2006 | |||||||||
Facility | No. of beds | completion date | (in thousands) | |||||||
Citrus County Detention Facility Lecanto, FL |
360 | First quarter 2007 | $ | 12,105 | ||||||
Crossroads Correctional Center Shelby, MT |
96 | First quarter 2007 | 5,500 | |||||||
Saguaro Correctional Facility Eloy, AZ |
1,896 | Second half 2007 | 80,299 | |||||||
North Fork Correctional Facility Sayre, OK |
960 | Fourth quarter 2007 | 55,000 | |||||||
Tallahatchie County
Correctional Facility Tutwiler, MS |
360 | Fourth quarter 2007 | 20,500 | |||||||
Webb County Detention Center Lardeo, TX |
722 | First quarter 2008 | 38,241 | |||||||
Total |
4,394 | $ | 211,645 | |||||||
41
42
43
44
Payments Due By Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2006 (remainder) | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | Thereafter | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt |
$ | 41 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 975,000 | $ | 975,041 | ||||||||||||||
Environmental
remediation |
838 | | | | | | 838 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Citrus County
Detention
Facility expansion |
11,323 | 782 | | | | | 12,105 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Operating leases |
215 | 435 | 444 | 453 | 462 | 2,195 | 4,204 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total contractual cash
obligations |
$ | 12,417 | $ | 1,217 | $ | 444 | $ | 453 | $ | 462 | $ | 977,195 | $ | 992,188 | ||||||||||||||
45
46
ITEM 3. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK. |
ITEM 4. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES. |
47
ITEM 1. | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS. |
ITEM 1A. | RISK FACTORS. |
ITEM 2. | UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS. |
ITEM 3. | DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES. |
ITEM 4. | SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS. |
Shares Voted | ||||||||
Name of Nominee | For | Withheld | ||||||
William F. Andrews |
32,894,632 | 453,937 | ||||||
John D. Ferguson |
33,295,539 | 53,030 | ||||||
Donna M. Alvarado |
33,288,075 | 60,494 | ||||||
Lucius E. Burch, III |
33,314,782 | 33,787 | ||||||
John D. Correnti |
33,306,377 | 42,192 | ||||||
John R. Horne |
33,307,666 | 40,903 | ||||||
C. Michael Jacobi |
33,307,813 | 40,756 | ||||||
Thurgood Marshall, Jr. |
33,284,893 | 63,676 | ||||||
Charles L. Overby |
32,742,248 | 606,321 | ||||||
John R. Prann, Jr. |
33,306,392 | 42,177 | ||||||
Joseph V. Russell |
33,307,601 | 40,968 | ||||||
Henri L. Wedell |
33,315,066 | 33,503 |
48
ITEM 5. | OTHER INFORMATION. |
49
ITEM 6. | EXHIBITS. |
Exhibit | ||
Number | Description of Exhibits | |
4.1 | Warrant No. W-3 to Purchase Shares of Common Stock of the Company dated December 28, 2000 issued
to CFE, Inc. |
|
4.2 | Warrant No. W-4 to Purchase Shares of Common Stock of the Company dated December 28, 2000 issued
to Bank of America, N.A. |
|
31.1 | Certification of the Companys Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Securities and Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. |
|
31.2 | Certification of the Companys Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Securities and Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. |
|
32.1 | Certification of the Companys Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
32.2 | Certification of the Companys Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
50
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA |
||||
Date: August 7, 2006 |
||||
/s/ John D. Ferguson | ||||
John D. Ferguson | ||||
President and Chief Executive Officer | ||||
/s/ Irving E. Lingo, Jr. | ||||
Irving E. Lingo, Jr. | ||||
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Assistant Secretary and Principal Accounting Officer |
||||
51