def14a
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
(AMENDMENT NO.___)
Filed by the Registrant o
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o
Check the appropriate box:
|
|
|
o |
|
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
|
|
|
|
ý |
|
Definitive Proxy Statement |
|
|
|
|
o |
|
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
|
|
|
|
o |
|
Definitive Additional Materials |
|
|
|
|
o |
|
Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 |
READING INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
READING INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
|
|
|
|
|
o |
Fee not required. |
|
|
|
|
o |
Fee
computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction
computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the
amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it
was determined):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
Total fee paid:
|
|
|
|
|
o |
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|
|
|
|
o |
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the
filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration
statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Amount Previously Paid:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Filing Party:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
Date Filed:
|
READING INTERNATIONAL, INC.
550 South Hope Street, Suite 1825
Los Angeles, CA 9007l
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON THURSDAY, MAY 26, 2005
To the Stockholders:
The 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the Annual
Meeting) of Reading International, Inc., a Nevada
corporation (RII or the Company and,
collectively with its consolidated subsidiaries and corporate
predecessors, Reading), will be held at the Four
Seasons Hotel Los Angeles at Beverly Hills, 300 South
Doheny Drive, Los Angeles, California, 90048, on Thursday,
May 26, 2005, at 11:00 a.m., Pacific time, subject to
adjournment or postponement, for the following purposes:
|
|
|
|
|
To elect eight directors to the Board of Directors to serve
until the 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders; and |
|
|
|
To transact such other business as may properly come before the
meeting, or any adjournment or postponement thereof. |
A copy of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for
its fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 is enclosed. Only
stockholders of record of the Companys Class B Voting
common stock, $0.01 par value (Class B Voting
Common Stock), at the close of business on April 25,
2005 (the Record Date) will be entitled to notice of
and to vote at the meeting and any adjournment or postponement
thereof. Prior to the voting thereof, a proxy may be revoked by
the person executing such proxy by:
|
|
|
|
|
filing with the Corporate Secretary or Assistant Corporate
Secretary of the Company, prior to the commencement of the
Annual Meeting, either a written notice of revocation or a duly
executed proxy bearing a later date; or |
|
|
|
attending and voting in person at the Annual Meeting. |
Holders of record of the Companys Class A
Nonvoting common stock, $0.01 par value (Class A
Nonvoting Common Stock), are being sent notices of the
meeting and copies of the Companys Annual Report, and are
invited to attend our Annual Meeting, but will have no voting
rights.
The Company will make available a list of the stockholders
entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting for examination at its
principal executive offices located at 550 S. Hope
Street, Suite 1825, Los Angeles, California 90071, at least
ten days prior to the date of the Annual Meeting. As our office
will be moving to a new location within this timeframe, please
call our Assistant Corporate Secretary at (213) 235-2236 to
make an appointment if you plan to stop by our offices prior to
the Annual Meeting.
If you are a holder of the Companys Class B Voting
Common Stock, and therefore entitled to vote at the Annual
Meeting, you will have received a proxy card enclosed with this
notice. Whether or not you expect to attend the Annual
Meeting in person, please fill in, sign, date and complete the
enclosed proxy card and return it promptly in the accompanying
postage prepaid, pre-addressed envelope, to assure that your
shares will be represented.
|
|
|
By Order of the Board of Directors |
|
|
|
|
James J. Cotter |
|
Chairman |
This proxy statement is first being mailed to stockholders on or
about May 6, 2005.
PLEASE SIGN AND DATE THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD AND MAIL IT
PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED RETURN ENVELOPE TO ENSURE THAT YOUR
VOTES ARE COUNTED.
READING INTERNATIONAL, INC.
550 South Hope Street, Suite l825
Los Angeles, CA 9007l
(2l3) 235-2240
PROXY STATEMENT
Annual Meeting of Stockholders
Thursday, May 26, 2005
INTRODUCTION
This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the
solicitation by the Board of Directors of Reading International,
Inc. (RII or the Company and,
collectively with its consolidated subsidiaries and corporate
predecessors, Reading), of proxies for use at our
upcoming Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the Annual
Meeting) to be held on Thursday, May 26, 2005, at
11:00 a.m., at the Four Seasons Hotel Los Angeles at
Beverly Hills, 300 South Doheny Drive, Los Angeles, California,
90048, and at any adjournment or postponement thereof. Please
sign, date and return the enclosed proxy card in order to ensure
that your shares are represented at our meeting.
At our Annual Meeting, you will be asked to elect eight
directors to the Board of Directors to serve until the 2006
Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
As of the Record Date, Mr. James J. Cotter, our Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer, owns directly or indirectly,
1,023,888 shares of our Class B Voting Common Stock.
Mr. Cotters holdings represent more than 66% of the
outstanding voting power of our Company. Accordingly,
Mr. Cotter has the power, acting alone and without the
support or approval of any of our other stockholders, to elect
the individuals currently nominated for election to our Board of
Directors at our upcoming Annual Meeting and to defeat the
election of any other individuals who might be nominated.
Mr. Cotter has advised us that he intends to vote in favor
of each of our Boards nominees for election at that
meeting.
VOTING AND PROXIES
If you owned shares of Class B Voting Common Stock on
April 25, 2005, you are eligible to vote, and you should
have received a proxy card enclosed with this notice.
|
|
|
What if I have the Class A stock? |
Holders of record of our Class A Nonvoting Common Stock are
being sent this Proxy Statement for their information and are
invited to attend our Annual Meeting but will have no voting
rights.
|
|
|
How many votes do I have? |
With respect to each matter to be considered at the Annual
Meeting, you will have one vote for each share of Class B
Voting Common Stock you owned on April 25, 2005. On that
date, there were a total of 1,545,506 shares of
Class B Voting Common Stock outstanding.
You may vote your shares in person by attending the 2005 Annual
Meeting. If you are not the record holder of your shares, please
refer to the discussion following the questions What if I
am not the record holder of my shares?
1
To vote by proxy, you should complete, sign and date the
enclosed proxy card and return it promptly in the enclosed
postage-paid envelope.
To be able to vote your shares in accordance with your
instructions at the Annual Meeting, we must receive your proxy
as soon as possible, but in any event, prior to the shares being
voted at the meeting. Shares represented by properly executed
proxies received by us will be voted at the Annual Meeting in
the manner specified therein or, if no instructions are marked
on the enclosed proxy card, will be voted FOR each
of the nominees for director. Although we do not know of any
other matter to be acted upon at the Annual Meeting, shares
represented by valid proxies will be voted in accordance with
the judgment of the individuals indicated on the proxy card with
respect to any other matters that may properly come before the
Annual Meeting.
|
|
|
If I plan to attend the Annual Meeting, should I still
submit a proxy? |
Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we urge
you to submit a proxy. Execution of a proxy will not in any way
affect your right to attend the Annual Meeting and vote in
person.
|
|
|
What if I want to revoke my proxy? |
You have the right to revoke your proxy at any time before it is
voted on your behalf by:
|
|
|
|
|
filing with our Corporate Secretary, prior to the commencement
of the Annual Meeting, a duly executed instrument dated
subsequent to such proxy revoking the same; |
|
|
|
submitting a duly executed proxy bearing a later date; or |
|
|
|
attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person. |
|
|
|
What if I am not the record holder of my shares? |
If your shares are held in the name of a brokerage firm, bank
nominee, or other institution, only it can give a proxy with
respect to your shares. You should receive a proxy card from
your bank or broker, which you must return in the envelope
provided in order to have your shares voted.
If you do not have record ownership of your shares and want to
vote in person at the 2005 Annual Meeting, you may obtain a
document called a legal proxy from the record holder
of your shares and bring it to the Annual Meeting in order to
vote in person.
Proxy Solicitation and Expenses
In addition to the solicitation by mail, our employees may
solicit proxies in person or by telephone but no additional
compensation will be paid to them for such services. The Company
will bear all costs of soliciting proxies on behalf of our Board
of Directors and will reimburse persons holding shares in their
own names or in the names of their nominees, but not owning such
shares beneficially, for the expenses of forwarding solicitation
materials to the beneficial owners.
The presence, in person or by proxy, of the holders of shares of
stock entitling them to cast a majority of the votes entitled to
be cast at our Annual Meeting will constitute a quorum.
Abstentions will be counted for purposes of determining the
presence of a quorum, as will broker non-votes, provided
authority is given to attend the meeting or to vote on any
matter to come before the meeting. Directors are elected by a
plurality vote, so abstentions and broker non-votes will not
affect the outcome of the election of directors.
2
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Beneficial Ownership of Securities
The following table sets forth the shares of common stock
beneficially owned as of the Record Date, for:
|
|
|
|
|
each of the directors standing for election and nominees; |
|
|
|
each person known to the Company to be the beneficial owner of
more than 5% of the Common Stock; and |
|
|
|
all directors and executive officers as a group. |
Except as noted, the indicated beneficial owner of the shares
has sole voting power and sole investment power.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership(1) | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Class A Non-Voting | |
|
Class B Voting | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Name and Address of |
|
Number of | |
|
Percentage | |
|
Number of | |
|
Percentage | |
Beneficial Owner |
|
Shares | |
|
of Stock | |
|
Shares | |
|
of Stock | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
James J. Cotter(2)(3)(5)
|
|
|
6,093,034 |
|
|
|
28.5 |
% |
|
|
1,161,388 |
|
|
|
75.1 |
% |
Eric Barr(2)(4)
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Cotter, Jr.(2)(3)(4)(5)
|
|
|
21,300 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Margaret Cotter(2)(3)(4)(5)
|
|
|
25,938 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
35,100 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
% |
William D. Gould(4)
|
|
|
57,340 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edward L. Kane(4)
|
|
|
20,100 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Gerard P. Laheney(2)(4)
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alfred Villaseñor, Jr.(2)(4)
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cotter Associates, LLC(5)
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120 North Robertson Blvd.
Los Angeles, CA 90048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hecco Ventures(6)
|
|
|
1,565,782 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120 North Robertson Blvd.
Los Angeles, CA 90048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Forman(7)
|
|
|
3,204,823 |
|
|
|
15.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120 North Robertson Blvd.
Los Angeles, CA 90048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pacific Assets Management LLC/
JMG Triton Offshore Fund Ltd(8)
|
|
|
3,775,400 |
|
|
|
18.4 |
% |
|
|
185,703 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
% |
|
1999 Avenue of the Stars, #2530
Los Angeles, CA 90067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lawndale Capital Management/
Diamond A Partners LP/Andrew E. Shapiro(9)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123,280 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
One Sansome Street, Suite 3800
San Francisco, CA 94104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dimensional Fund Advisors(10)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,740 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
1299 Ocean Avenue, 11th Floor
Santa Monica, CA 90401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All directors and Executive Officers as a Group (13 persons)
|
|
|
6,546,042 |
|
|
|
32.0 |
% |
|
|
1,209,088 |
|
|
|
78.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Beneficial ownership is based on 20,483,733 shares of
Class A Nonvoting and 1,545,506 shares of Class B
Voting Common Stock outstanding as of the Record Date. |
|
|
(2) |
550 South Hope Street, Suite 1825, Los Angeles, California
90071. |
3
|
|
|
|
(3) |
Mr. Cotter directly owns directly or indirectly through
wholly owned entities, 3,602,252 shares of Class A
Nonvoting Common Stock (inclusive of 29,730 shares held in
Mr. Cotters profit sharing plan) and
1,023,888 shares of Class B Voting Common Stock.
Mr. Cotter has currently exercisable stock options to
acquire 925,000 and 137,500 shares of Class A
Nonvoting and Class B Voting Common Stock, respectively.
Mr. Cotter is also considered the beneficial owner of
1,565,782 shares of Class A Nonvoting Common Stock
owned by Hecco Ventures, a general partnership (HV).
Mr. Cotter has voting and investment power with respect to
these shares and is the general partner of James J. Cotter Ltd.,
the general partner of HV. Mr. James J. Cotter, Jr.
and Ms. Margaret Cotter are Mr. Cotters son and
daughter, and they serve on the Board of Directors. Each has
options to acquire 20,000 shares of Class A Nonvoting
Common Stock. In addition, Ms. Margaret Cotter currently
holds exercisable options to acquire 35,100 shares of
Class B Voting Common Stock. Ms. Ellen Cotter is the
daughter of Mr. Cotter, the sister of
Mr. Cotter, Jr., and Ms. Margaret Cotter.
Ms. Ellen Cotter is the Chief Operating Officer of the
Companys domestic cinemas. She holds currently holds
exercisable options to acquire 75,000 shares of
Class A Nonvoting Common Stock and 12,500 shares of
Class B Voting Common Stock. Mr. James J.
Cotter, Jr., Ms. Ellen Cotter and Ms. Margaret
Cotter are the sole limited partners of the James J. Cotter Ltd. |
|
|
(4) |
Includes 20,000 shares of Class A Nonvoting Common
Stock for each of the directors which may be acquired through
the exercise of currently exercisable stock options. |
|
|
(5) |
Cotter Associates, LLC owns 1,000,000 shares of
Class A Nonvoting Common Stock. Mr. James J. Cotter
has a 1% voting membership interest and an irrevocable trust has
a 99% nonvoting membership interest in Cotter Associates, LLC.
The irrevocable trust benefits Mr. Cotters three
children; Ms. Ellen M. Cotter, Mr. James J.
Cotter, Jr., and Ms. Margaret Cotter. All
1,000,000 shares are included in the beneficial ownership
amount for Mr. James J. Cotter above. These same shares are
also shown separately in the beneficial ownership amount for
Cotter Associates, LLC. |
|
|
(6) |
Hecco Ventures (HV) is a California general
partnership. Mr. James J. Cotter is the general partner of
James J. Cotter LTD, the limited partnership which is the
general partner of HV. The other general partners of HV are
Mr. Michael Forman and a subsidiary of the Decurion
Corporation, a company privately owned by Mr. Forman and
certain members of his family. HV has granted Mr. Cotter
the right to vote the shares held by it. Accordingly,
Mr. Cotter has sole voting power and shared investment
power. |
|
|
(7) |
Based on Form 3 filed October 12, 2004. |
|
|
(8) |
Based on Schedule 13-G filed October 12, 2004 for
Class B Voting Common Stock. Pacific Asset Management LLC
(Pacific) does not hold the securities as part of a
group. However, Pacific serves as the investment manager to the
direct beneficial owner, JMG Triton Offshore Fund, Ltd. and has
the power to determine whether or when the securities will be
sold. |
|
|
(9) |
Based on Schedule 13-D filed December 13, 2004 for
Class B Voting Common Stock, which includes shares which
are owned of record by Diamond A Partners, L.P (DAP)
and by Diamond A Investors L.P (DAI) over which
Lawndale Capital Management, Inc. (LCM) and
Mr. Andrew E. Shapiro have shared voting and dispositive
power. According to filings with the SEC, Lawndale Capital
Management, Inc. is the investment advisor to DAP and DAI, which
are investment limited partnerships and Mr. Shapiro is the
sole manager of LCM. |
|
|
(10) |
Based on Schedule 13-G filed February 6, 2004. |
Nominees for Election
Eight directors are to be elected at our Annual Meeting to serve
until the next annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2006
or until their successors are elected and qualified. Unless
otherwise instructed, the proxy holders will vote the proxies
received by us for the election of the nominees below, all of
whom are currently directors of the Company. The eight nominees
for election to the Board of Directors who receive the greatest
number of votes cast for the election of directors by the shares
present and entitled to vote will be elected directors. If any
nominee becomes unavailable for any reason, it is intended that
the proxies will be
4
voted for a substitute nominee designated by the Board of
Directors. We have no reason to believe the nominees named will
be unable to serve if elected.
The names of the nominees for director, together with certain
information regarding them, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age | |
|
Position |
|
|
| |
|
|
James J. Cotter
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer(1) |
Eric Barr
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
Director(2) |
James J. Cotter, Jr.
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
Director |
Margaret Cotter
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
Director |
William D. Gould
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
Director(3) |
Edward L. Kane
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
Director(2) |
Gerard P. Laheney
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
Director(1)(2)(3) |
Alfred Villaseñor, Jr.
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
Director(1)(3) |
|
|
(1) |
Member of the Executive Committee. |
|
(2) |
Member of the Audit and Conflicts Committee. |
|
(3) |
Member of the Compensation and Stock Option Committee. |
Mr. James J. Cotter is our Chairman of the Board, President
and Chief Executive Officer. With the exception of a period
beginning in 1988 and ending in 1991, Mr. Cotter has served
as a director of the Company since 1986 and as Chairman of the
Board since 1992. Mr. Cotter was named Chief Executive
Officer on August 1, 1999, a position which he has held
continuously, except for an approximately two month period
during the last quarter of 2000, since that date.
Mr. Cotter is, and has been for more than the past five
years, the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of
each of Craig Corporation (CRG) and the company
formerly known as Reading Entertainment, Inc (REI),
which were consolidated into the Company at the end of 2001, and
which continue today as subsidiaries of the Company.
Mr. Cotter is, and has been for more than the past five
years, a director of The Decurion Corporation (motion picture
exhibition and real estate company); the Chief Executive Officer
and a director of Townhouse Cinemas Corporation (motion picture
exhibition company); the General Partner of James J. Cotter,
Ltd., a general partner in Hecco Ventures which is involved in
investment activities and is a major stockholder in the Company;
the Chief Executive Officer and 50% owner of Sutton Hill
Capital, LLC and its predecessors (cinema exhibition and the
counterparty to the various agreements comprising the City
Cinemas Transaction); and prior to its acquisition by our
Company, the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and 50%
stockholder of Off Broadway Investments, Inc. Mr. Cotter
was also a director of Stater Bros., Inc. (a retail grocery
company) from 1987 to 1997.
Mr. Eric Barr has been a director of our Company
since March 21, 2002. Mr. Barr is a resident of
Brighton, Victoria in Australia, with extensive knowledge of the
Australian business community. Prior to his appointment,
Mr. Barr retired in June 2001 from his position as audit
partner with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLC in Australia, after
having been with that firm for 36 years. Mr. Barr
serves as the Chairman of our Audit and Conflicts Committee.
Mr. James J. Cotter, Jr. has been a director of
our Company since March 21, 2002. He has been Chief
Executive Officer of Cecelia Packing Corporation (citrus packing
and marketing) since July 2004. Mr. Cotter, Jr. served
as a director to Cecelia Packing Corporation from February 1996
to September 1997 and as a director of Gish Biomedical from
September 1999 to March 2002. He was an attorney in the law firm
of Winston & Strawn, specializing in corporate law,
from September 1997 to May 2004. Mr. Cotter, Jr. is
the son of James J. Cotter and the brother of Margaret Cotter
and Ellen Cotter. Mr. Cotter, Jr. is a limited partner
in James J. Cotter Ltd, which is a general partner of Hecco
Ventures and a beneficiary of the family trust that owns a 99%
membership interest in Cotter Associates, LLC.
Ms. Margaret Cotter has been a director of our
Company since September 27, 2002, and was a director of CRG
from 1998 to September 26, 2002, when she joined the Board
of our Company. Ms. Cotter is also the owner and President
of Off Broadway Investments, LLC, a company that provides live
theatre management
5
services to our live theaters. Pursuant to that management
arrangement, Ms. Cotter also serves as the President of
Liberty Theaters, the subsidiary through which we own our live
theaters. Ms. Cotter is also a theatrical producer who has
produced shows in Chicago and New York. Ms. Cotter served
as the Vice President of Union Square Management, Inc. (live
theatre management) from 1998 to 2000. Ms. Cotter is an
officer of the League of Off-Broadway Theaters and Producers and
is a member of the New York State Bar. From February 1994 until
September 1997, Ms. Cotter was an Assistant District
Attorney for Kings County in Brooklyn, New York.
Ms. Cotter graduated from Georgetown University Law Center
in 1993. She is the daughter of Mr. James J. Cotter
and the sister of Mr. James J. Cotter, Jr. and
Ms. Ellen Cotter. Ms. Cotter is a limited partner in
James J. Cotter Ltd., which is a general partner of Hecco
Ventures and is a beneficiary of the family trust that owns a
99% membership interest in Cotter Associates, LLC.
Mr. William D. Gould has been a director of our
Company since October 15, 2004 and has been a member of the
law firm of Troy & Gould since 1986. Previously, he was
a partner of the law firm of OMelveny & Myers.
Mr. Gould was a director of Craig Corporation from 1985
until its consolidation with REI and CHC on December 31,
2001. Our Company has from time to time retained Troy &
Gould for legal advice.
Mr. Edward L. Kane has been a director of our
Company since October 15, 2004. Mr. Kane has been
President of High Avenue Consulting, a healthcare consulting
firm, since May 2000. Mr. Kane is also Chairman of Kane/
Miller Book Publishers, Inc., a publisher of childrens
picture books, a position he has held since January 2001, and a
director of BDI Investment Corporation, a registered investment
company, a position he has held since 1990. Mr. Kane was
President of Reading Company, the predecessor of REI, from
December 1991 to January 1993, serving as a director of REI
until December 1999, and President of CRG from January 1988 to
January 1993, serving as a director of CRG until 1996. From 1985
to 1991, Mr. Kane served as a Director of CHC, also serving
as President from 1987 to 1988.
Mr. Gerard P. Laheney has been a director of our
Company since September 27, 2002, and was a director of CRG
from 1990 to September 26, 2002, when he joined the Board
of our Company. Mr. Laheney served as a director of Reading
Company, the predecessor of REI, between November 1993 and June
1996. Mr. Laheney has been President of Aegis Investment
Management Company, an investment advisory firm specializing in
global investment portfolio management, since August 1993.
Mr. Laheney was a Vice President of Dean Witter Reynolds
from April 1990 to December 1993.
Mr. Alfred Villaseñor, Jr. has been a
director of our Company since 1987. He has also served as a
director for Fidelity Federal Savings and Loan.
Mr. Villaseñor is the President and owner of Unisure
Insurance Services, Incorporated, a corporation that has
specialized in life, business and group health insurance for
over 35 years. He is also a general partner in Plaza de
Villa, a California real estate commercial center.
Mr. Villaseñor is a director of the John Gogian Family
Foundation and a director of Richstone Centers, a non-profit
organization.
Attendance at Board and Committee Meetings
During the year ended December 31, 2004, the Board of
Directors held 7 Board meetings. Each director attended at least
75% of the meetings of the Board of Directors and all committees
on which he or she served, during the period such individual was
a director. The Audit and Conflicts Committee held 4 meetings in
2004. The Stock Options and Compensation Committee had 2
meetings during 2004. The Company has no standing nominating
committee. Our Companys Board Committees are discussed in
greater detail under the caption Board
Committees, below.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting
Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our
Companys officers, directors and persons who own more than
10% of the Companys Common Stock to file reports to
ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC. The SEC rules
also require such reporting persons to furnish the Company with
a copy of all Section 16(a) forms they file.
6
Based solely on a review of the copies of the forms which the
Company received and written representations from certain
reporting persons, during 2004, the following filings on
Form 3 or 4 were inadvertently late. None related to a
purchase or sale of securities. Rather, they related in the case
of filing by Mr. James J. Cotter dated 11/29/04 and
12/30/04 to certain gifts of stock made by Mr. Cotter and
in the case of filings by Mr. Edward L. Kane and Wayne
Smith on 10/26/04, the date on which they became, respectively,
a director and an executive officer of the Company.
Indemnity Agreements
In 1990, our Board authorized our Company to enter into
indemnity agreements with its then current directors and
officers. Since that time, we have typically entered into
indemnity agreements with our directors and senior officers. In
2001, our stockholders approved a new form of indemnity
agreement, which has been used since that date to memorialize
our Companys indemnity obligations. Under these
agreements, our Company, generally speaking, has agreed to
indemnify our directors and various of our senior officers
against all expenses, liabilities and losses incurred in
connection with any threatened, pending or contemplated action,
suit or proceeding, whether civil or criminal, administrative or
investigative, to which any such director or officer is a party
or is threatened to be made a party, in any manner, based upon,
arising from, relating to or by reason of the fact that such
individual is, was, shall be or shall has been a director,
officer employee, agent or fiduciary of our Company. Each of our
current directors and senior officers, as well as certain of the
directors and senior officers of our subsidiaries, currently has
the benefit of such indemnity agreements.
Compensation of Directors
Directors who are not officers or employees of the Company
received an annual retainer of $25,000 for their services
including attendance at meetings and service on Board
committees. Only the Chairman of the Board and the Chairman of
our Audit and Conflicts Committee receive additional
compensation for their services. The Chairman of our Audit and
Conflicts Committee received an annual retainer of $27,000. The
Chairman of the Board receives $195,000 annually, which is
included as part of his $545,000 total annual compensation. In
addition, upon joining the Board, directors who are not officers
or employees of the Company receive 20,000 immediately vested
options to purchase shares of our Class A Nonvoting Common
Stock at an exercise price equal to the market price of the
stock at the time of grant. Ms. Margaret Cotter has agreed
to serve as a director of the Company without any additional
consideration other than her stock options.
Board Committees and Corporate Governance
Our Board of Directors has standing Executive, Audit and
Conflicts, and Compensation and Stock Options Committees. These
committees are discussed in greater detail below. Our Board of
Directors does not have a nominating committee. Typically,
nominations are suggested to our Board of Directors by our
Chairman and controlling stockholder, Mr. James J. Cotter.
Since Mr. Cotter owns a majority of our Class B Voting
Common Stock, our Board of Directors has determined that the
Company satisfies the criteria for a Controlled
Company under Section 801 of Part 8 of the
American Stock Exchange Company Guide. After reviewing the
benefits and detriments of taking advantage of the exceptions to
the Corporate Governance Rules set forth in Part 8, the
Board of Directors in 2004 unanimously determined to take
advantage of all of the exceptions from Part 8 afforded to
our Company as a Controlled Company under Section 801.
Among the exceptions afforded to Controlled Companies is an
exception from the requirement that we have an independent
nominating committee or independent nominating process. It was
noted by our Directors that the use of an independent nominating
committee or independent nominating process would be of limited
utility, in light of the fact that any nominee would need to be
acceptable to Mr. James J. Cotter as our controlling
stockholder and in light of the fact that under our governing
documents and applicable Nevada Law, Mr. Cotter, acting in
his capacity as a stockholder, can unilaterally nominate and
elect candidates to our Board of Directors at our annual meeting
or any other meeting where our directors are to be elected.
Mr. Cotter has advised our directors that he prefers to be
actively involved in the identification and selection of
7
Board nominees, and the he believes that it would be in the best
interests of our Company and stockholders if we continued to
treat the nomination process in the same way as in prior periods.
Our Board of Directors does not have a formal written policy
with respect to the consideration of director candidates
recommended by our stockholders since, in the view of our Board,
there has been no compelling reason to put any formal policy in
place. No stockholder has, in more than the past ten years,
made any proposal or recommendation to the Board as to potential
nominees, nor has Mr. Cotter ever proposed, in the time he
has been our principal or controlling stockholder, any nominee
that our remaining directors have found to be unacceptable.
Furthermore, neither our governing documents nor applicable
Nevada law place any restriction on the nomination of candidates
for election to our Board of Directors directly by our
stockholders. Accordingly, our Directors are currently of the
view that in light of (i) the fact that our Company is a
Controlled Company under applicable American Stock
Exchange criteria and exempted from the American Stock Exchange
requirements for an independent nominating process, and
(ii) the fact that neither our governing documents nor
Nevada law place any limitation upon the direct nomination of
director candidates by our stockholders, that the current system
suitably addresses the needs of our Company and our stockholders
and that little if anything would be gained by adopting a formal
policy with respect to such matters at this time.
Our Board of Directors will, as it has traditionally advised our
stockholder in our proxy materials each year, consider
nominations from our stockholders, provided written notice
delivered to the Secretary of our Company at our Companys
principal executive offices not less than 120 days prior to
the first anniversary of the immediately preceding annual
meeting of our stockholders at which directors are elected, or
such earlier date as may be reasonable in the event that our
annual stockholders meeting is moved forward. Such written
notice must set forth the name, age, address and principal
occupation or employment of such nominee, the number of shares
of our Companys common stock beneficially owned by such
nominee and such other information as is required by the proxy
rules of the SEC with respect to a nominee of our Board of
Directors. After May 30, 2005, our principal executive
offices will be located at 500 Citadel Drive,
Suite D-300, City of Commerce, California 90040.
Alternatively, under our governing documents and applicable
Nevada Law, nominations may be made directly by stockholders
from the floor of any meeting at which directors are to be
elected. See also, the material set forth below under the
caption Stockholder Proposals and Director
Nominations.
Our directors have not adopted any formal criteria with respect
to the qualifications required to be a director or the
particular skills that should be represented on our Board of
Directors, other than the need to have at least one Director and
member of our Audit and Compensation Committee who qualifies as
an audit committee financial expert, and has not
historically retained any third party to identify or evaluate or
to assist in identifying or evaluating potential nominees.
All of the current nominees were recommended to the Board by
Mr. Cotter. No other recommendations were received by us
with respect to possible nominees to our Board of Directors.
Executive Committee
Our Company has a standing Executive Committee comprised of
Messrs. Cotter, Laheney and Villaseñor that is
authorized, to the fullest extent permitted by Nevada law, to
take action on matters between meetings of the full Board of
Directors. In recent years, this committee has not been used,
and with the exception of matters delegated to the Audit and
Conflicts Committee or the Compensation and Stock Options
Committee, all matters requiring Board approval have been
considered by the entire Board of Directors.
Audit and Conflicts
Committee; Audit Committee Report
Our Board of Directors maintains a standing Audit and Conflicts
Committee, referred to herein as the Audit Committee. The Audit
Committee operates under a Charter adopted by the Board of
Directors, a copy of which is on file with the Securities and
Exchange Commission. Our Board of Directors has determined that
the Audit Committee is comprised entirely of independent
directors, (as independence is defined in
8
Sections 121(A) and 803 of the American Stock Exchange
Company Guide), and that Mr. Barr, the Chairman of our
Audit Committee, is qualified as an Audit Committee Financial
Expert. With respect to our fiscal year ended December 31,
2004, our Audit and Conflicts Committee comprised of Directors
Barr, Kane and Laheney.
Set forth below is the Audit Committee Report.
The following is the report of the Reading International, Inc.
(the Company) Audit Committee with respect to the Companys
audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004.
The purpose of the Audit Committee is to assist the Board in its
general oversight of the Companys financial reporting,
internal controls and audit functions. The Audit Committee
Charter describes in greater detail the full responsibilities of
the Committee. The Audit Committee is comprised solely of
independent directors as defined by the listing standards of
National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.
The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the consolidated
financial statements with management and Deloitte &
Touche, LLP, the Companys independent auditors. Management
is responsible for the preparation, presentation and integrity
of the Companys financial statements; accounting and
financial reporting principles; establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rule 13a-15(e)); establishing and maintaining internal
control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rule 13a-15(f)); evaluating the effectiveness of disclosure
controls and procedures; evaluating the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting; and evaluating any
change in internal control over financial reporting that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, internal control over financial reporting.
Deloitte & Touche, LLP is responsible for performing an
independent audit of the consolidated financial statements and
expressing an opinion on the conformity of those financial
statements with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America, as well as expressing an opinion on
(i) managements assessment of the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting and (ii) the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting.
During the course of fiscal 2004, management completed the
documentation, testing and evaluation of the Companys
system of internal control over financial reporting in response
to the requirements set forth in Section 404 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and related regulations. The Audit
Committee was kept apprised of the progress of the evaluation
and provided oversight and advice to management during the
process. In connection with this oversight, the Committee
received periodic updates provided by management and
Deloitte & Touche, LLP at each regularly scheduled
Committee meeting. The Committee also held a number of special
meetings to discuss issues as they arose. At the conclusion of
the process, management provided the Committee with and the
Committee reviewed a report on the effectiveness of the
Companys internal control over financial reporting. The
Committee also reviewed the report of management contained in
the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 filed with the SEC, as
well as Deloitte & Touche, LLPs Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm included in the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K related to its
audit of (i) the consolidated financial statements and
financial statement schedule, (ii) managements
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting and (iii) the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting. The Committee continues to
oversee the Companys efforts related to its internal
control over financial reporting and managements
preparations for the evaluation in fiscal 2005.
The Audit Committee has discussed with Deloitte &
Touche, LLP the matters required to be discussed by Statement on
Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended, Communication
with Audit Committees and PCAOB Auditing Standard
No. 2, An Audit of Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting Performed in Conjunction with an Audit of Financial
Statements. In addition, Deloitte & Touche, LLP
has provided the Audit Committee with the written disclosures
and the letter required by the Independence Standards Board
Standard No. 1, as amended, Independence Discussions
with Audit Committees, and the Audit Committee has
discussed with Deloitte & Touche, LLP their firms
independence.
9
Based on their review of the consolidated financial statements
and discussions with and representations from management and
Deloitte & Touche, LLP referred to above, the Audit
Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited
financial statements be included in the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2004, for filing with
the Securities and Exchange Commission.
|
|
|
Eric Barr, Chairman |
|
Edward L. Kane |
|
Gerard P. Laheney |
|
|
|
Compensation and Stock Options Committee |
Our Company has a standing Compensation and Stock Options
Committee, which we refer to simply as our Compensation
Committee, comprised of two or more of our independent
directors. Prior to November 2004, the Compensation Committee
members were Alfred Villaseñor, Jr., William C.
Soady and Gerard P. Laheney. In November 2004,
William D. Gould replaced Mr. Soady following
Mr. Soadys retirement as a director of the Company.
Mr. Villaseñor serves as Chairman of the Compensation
Committee.
Set forth below is the Compensation Committees Report on
Executive Compensation for 2004. The following Report does not
constitute soliciting material and should not be considered or
deemed filed, or incorporated by reference into any filing, by
the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission, except
to the extent the Company specifically incorporates the Report
by reference.
|
|
|
Report on Executive Compensation |
Our Companys executive compensation policy and programs
are designed to attract and retain talented executives and to
give them an appropriate incentive to achieve the Companys
business objectives that the Board of Directors believes will
enhance stockholder value.
Each of the current named executive officers receives a base
annual salary that, except in the case of Mr. James Cotter,
our Chief Executive Officer, was originally established by
negotiation between the Company and the particular executive
when he or she joined the Company. These base salaries are
adjusted periodically based upon the recommendations of our
Companys Chief Executive Officer and other senior
management and other factors, including competitive factors.
Mr. Cotters base salary and recent salary adjustments
are discussed below in this report.
We supplement the base salaries of the Companys Chief
Executive Officer and other named executive officers with
periodic discretionary cash bonuses in recognition of individual
performance and predicated on, among other things, the overall
financial performance of the Company. Historically, we also have
relied upon stock option grants to link the executives
long-term compensation to appreciation in stockholder value over
time. In connection with the change in financial accounting
rules requiring the expensing of stock options, commencing in
2005 with the recommended award to the Companys Chief
Executive Officer discussed below, we intend to utilize awards
of restricted stock in lieu of stock options, because of the
relative advantages to the recipient of restricted stock as
compared to stock options and the elimination of the prior
beneficial accounting treatment accorded to stock options.
10
Periodic cash bonuses and stock option grants, or restricted
stock awards, to Mr. Cotter and to the Companys other
named executive officers are determined primarily on the basis
of the individual job performance and achievement of the
Companys business objectives, but no particular weighting
is given by the Compensation Committee to individual performance
versus the achievement of the Companys objectives. These
variable elements in compensation recognize individual
contributions and are determined based upon such factors as the
level of the executives responsibilities, the efficiency
and effectiveness with which he or she oversees the matters
under his or her supervision and the degree to which the officer
has contributed to the accomplishment of major tasks that
advance the Companys goals. Additional compensation in
excess of base salary is awarded entirely on a discretionary
basis when the individual is deemed to have contributed to the
Company beyond the level reflected in the individuals base
salary.
Except in the case of Mr. Cotter and members of his family,
compensation decisions historically have been made by
Mr. Cotter, as Chief Executive Officer, subject to the
supervision of the Compensation Committee and the full Board of
Directors. Grants of stock options and awards of restricted
stock other than to Mr. Cotter and his family members,
typically are recommended by Mr. Cotter for approval by the
Compensation Committee or the Compensation Committees
recommendation to the full Board of Directors. All decisions
regarding Mr. Cotters compensation and all
compensation paid to members of his family are made by the full
Board of Directors upon the advice and recommendation of the
Compensation Committee.
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officers Compensation |
During 2004, as in prior years, Mr. Cotter served as Chief
Executive Officer of the Company in accordance with a
long-standing consulting arrangement between him and Craig
Corporation, which was consolidated with our Company in 2001,
pursuant to which he was paid $350,000 annually for his services
as Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Cotter also received
$195,000 during 2004 for his services as the Chairman of the
Board of the Company, or total base-level cash compensation of
$545,000, which was unchanged from 2003. Mr. Cotter is
entitled to be reimbursed for out-of-pocket business expenses
incurred by him on the same basis as other Company employees,
and he has received no Company perks, except that he is
permitted to make use of a Los Angeles condominium owned by the
Company when he is in Los Angeles, which is typically from
Monday through Thursday of most work weeks when he is not
traveling on Company business. Also, when on business in New
York City, Mr. Cotter typically stays in an apartment he
owns there, and is reimbursed by the Company for each
nights stay for the approximate cost of a comparable
hotel. Mr. Cotter does not currently participate in any of
the Companys health, medical or retirement benefit
programs.
The base-level cash compensation paid by the Company to
Mr. Cotter (taking into account amounts previously paid to
him by Reading Entertainment, Inc. and Craig Corporation prior
to their consolidation with the Company in 2001), has not been
increased for more than the past ten years. Historically, the
Company has not utilized compensation consultants in connection
with its executive compensation decisions. In 2004, however, the
Company retained Towers Perrin, executive compensation
consultants, to perform an analysis of chief executive
compensation among a peer group of companies. In consultation
with the Companys executives, including Mr. Cotter,
Towers Perrin identified a peer group of companies in the real
estate investment trust and cinema exhibition industries, which
are the two principal lines of business of the Company. The
Compensation Committees review of Mr. Cotters
compensation in light of this peer group indicated that
Mr. Cotter was under-compensated in relation to his peers
during at least the four years 2000 through 2004, based upon the
Compensation Committees judgment that
Mr. Cotters total annual compensation fall within the
66th percentile among the peer group. Based upon this
finding, the Compensation Committee determined in March 2005 to
recommend to the full Board of Directors that the Company award
Mr. Cotter a one-time bonus of $1.1 million.
Mr. Cotter has agreed to negotiate with the Company to take
restricted stock in the Company to the value of
$1.1 million.
11
The Compensation Committee also determined to recommend to the
Companys Board of Directors that Mr. Cotters
historical consulting arrangement be eliminated, and that he not
be compensated separately for his services as Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer. The Compensation Committee will recommend
that Mr. Cotter instead be employed by the Company as the
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer for a base salary of
$500,000 per year for each of 2005 and 2006. The
Compensation Committee also will recommend that Mr. Cotter
receive an annual cash bonus of $250,000 during each of 2005 and
2006 if specific goals are achieved with respect to certain
Company projects in which Mr. Cotter is involved on a
hands-on basis. The specific projects are to be agreed upon
between the Compensation Committee and Mr. Cotter in
consultation with other senior management of the Company and
Towers Perrin. The Compensation Committee will further recommend
Mr. Cotter for an award of $250,000 of restricted shares of
Class A common stock of the Company as of the end of each
of 2005 and 2006 so long as he is then still serving as Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer. Each annual award of restricted
shares would vest in two annual installments of 50% each on the
first and second anniversaries of the award date and would be
subject to forfeiture by Mr. Cotter unless he remains
employed as Chief Executive Officer of the Company through such
dates. Once the project goals referred to above have been
established, the Compensation Committees final
recommendations will be submitted to the full Board of Directors
and, to the extent adopted by the Board, are expected to be made
retroactive to January of this year.
At present, the Company has no employment contract with
Mr. Cotter, and he is not entitled to any change of
control, retirement, severance or deferred compensation benefits
or any other employee benefits not shared by employees,
generally, other than as described in this Report. It is
anticipated, however, that Mr. Cotter and the Company will
negotiate an employment contract for 2005 and 2006 that
incorporates the final compensation arrangements with
Mr. Cotter, approved by the Board of Directors.
|
|
|
Stock Option Grants and Restricted Stock Awards |
In light of the Compensation Committees recommendation of
a one-time monetary or special restricted stock award to
Mr. Cotter, no stock options or other stock-based
incentives were awarded to Mr. Cotter for 2004. In light of
the stock options awarded in 2002 and 2003 to the Companys
other named executive officers, which vest over four years,
no new stock option grants or restricted stock awards were made
to these officers in 2004.
Subject to an exception for performance-based
compensation, Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue
Code generally prohibits corporations from deducting for federal
income tax purposes annual compensation paid to any senior
executive officer to the extent that such annul compensation
exceeds $1 million. This law may affect the deductibility
of Mr. Cotters total compensation for 2005 in light
of the recent recommendations of the Compensation Committee
regarding the award of restricted stock and other compensation
to Mr. Cotter. The Compensation Committee and the Board of
Directors consider the limits on deductibility under
Section 162(m) in establishing executive compensation, but
retain the discretion to authorize the payment of compensation
that exceeds the limit on deductibility under this Section.
In the Compensation Committees view, the total
compensation of Mr. Cotter and other named executive
officers, in the aggregate, is reasonable and not excessive. The
Compensation Committees view is based upon, among other
considerations, the CEO competitive peer group analysis
performed by Towers Perrin.
|
|
|
William D. Gould |
|
Gerard P. Laheney |
|
Alfred Villaseñor, Jr. |
12
Vote Required; Recommendation of the Board
The eight nominees receiving the greatest number of votes cast
at the Annual Meeting will be elected to the Board of Directors.
Mr. Cotter has advised us that he intends to vote the
1,023,888 shares of Class B Voting Common Stock under
his direct or indirect ownership in favor of each of our
nominees. Since this represents more than 66% of the outstanding
Class B Voting Common Stock, if Mr. Cotter votes these
shares as he has advised, then the nominees will be elected
whether or not they receive the votes of any other holders of
our voting stock.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR EACH OF THE NOMINEES.
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Management of the Company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age | |
|
Title |
|
|
| |
|
|
Ellen M. Cotter
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
Chief Operating Officer Domestic Cinemas |
Brett Marsh
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
Vice President Real Estate |
Andrzej Matyczynski
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
Wayne Smith
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
Executive Director Australia and New Zealand |
Robert F. Smerling
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
President Domestic Cinemas |
S. Craig Tompkins
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
Executive Vice President, Director Business Affairs,
Chief Legal Officer and Secretary |
Ms. Ellen Cotter joined our Company in March 1998
and is the Chief Operating Officer of our domestic cinema
operations. Ms. Cotter is a graduate of Smith College and
holds a Juris Doctorate from Georgetown Law School. Prior to her
involvement with the Company, Ms. Cotter spent four years
in private practice as a corporate attorney with the law firm of
White & Case in Manhattan. Ms. Cotter is the
daughter of James J. Cotter and the sister of James J.
Cotter, Jr. and Margaret Cotter, each of whom are directors
of the Company. Ms. Cotter is a limited partner in James J.
Cotter Ltd., which is a general partner of Hecco Ventures and is
a beneficiary of the family trust that owns a 99% membership
interest in Cotter Associates, LLC.
Mr. Marsh has been with our Company since 1993 and
is responsible for the Companys real estate activities.
Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Marsh was the Senior Vice
President of Burton Property Trust, Inc., the U.S. real
estate subsidiary of the Burton Group PLC. In this position,
Mr. Marsh was responsible for the real estate portfolio of
that company.
Mr. Matyczynski was named Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer of the Company and CRG and the Chief
Administrative Officer of REI on November 18, 1999.
Mr. Matyczynski was named the Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer of REI effective June 2, 2000. Prior to joining
the Company, Mr. Matyczynski held various positions over a
twenty-year period with Beckman Coulter in the U.S. and Europe.
Beckman Coulter is a leading provider of instrument systems and
related products that automate laboratory processes. His last
position at Beckman Coulter was that of Worldwide Director of
Financial Reporting and Accounting, as well as serving as a
director for certain Beckman Coulter subsidiaries.
Mr. Smith joined our Company in April 2004 as
Executive Director of Australia and New Zealand. He is
effectively the senior executive officer responsible for our
operations in that geographic area. Mr. Smith brings to
Reading 20 years of experience in cinema operations and
property management gained at Hoyts Cinema Limited, his last
position there being General Manager Property.
13
Mr. Smerling was appointed President of Citadel
Cinemas, Inc. effective September 1, 2000 following the
Companys acquisition of the City Cinemas.
Mr. Smerling also served as the President and a director of
REI. Mr. Smerling has served as the senior executive
officer responsible for our various domestic and Puerto Rican
exhibition subsidiaries since 1994. Prior to joining us,
Mr. Smerling was the President of Loews Theater Management
Corporation from May 1990 until November 1993. Mr. Smerling
also served as President and Chief Executive Officer of City
Cinemas Corporation, a motion picture exhibitor located in New
York City, from November 1993 to September 2000.
Mr. Tompkins is the Executive Vice President,
Director Business Affairs, Chief Legal Officer and
Corporate Secretary of the Company. Mr. Tompkins was a
member of the Board of Directors of the Company from 1993 to
September 26, 2002, resigning immediately prior to the
election of Mr. Gerard P. Laheney and Ms. Margaret
Cotter in order to allow for a board comprised of a majority of
independent directors. Mr. Tompkins was elected Vice
Chairman of the Board and Principal Accounting Officer and
Treasurer in 1994. Mr. Tompkins resigned as Principal
Accounting Officer and Treasurer in November 1999, upon the
appointment of Andrzej Matyczynski to serve as the
Companys Chief Financial Officer. For more than the past
five years, Mr. Tompkins has been the President and a
Director of CRG, the Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors of
REI. Prior to joining Reading, Mr. Tompkins was a partner
in the law firm of Gibson Dunn & Crutcher.
Mr. Tompkins is also a Director and the Chairman of the
Strategic Planning Committee for G&L Realty Corp (a New York
Stock Exchange listed real estate investment trust, specializing
in the development and ownership of health care properties), a
Managing Director of G&L Senior Care Properties LLC (a
private company specializing in the development, ownership and
operation of skilled nursing facilities), an Advisory Director
of Marshall & Stevens (an independent valuation firm),
and a member of the Advisory Committee of GWA Investments, LLC
(a private hedge fund specializing in activist stockholder
investing). Mr. Tompkins was a director of Fidelity Federal
Bank, FSB (Fidelity), where he served on the Audit
and Compensation Committees, from April 2000 until the sale of
that institution effective December 31, 2001.
14
Summary Compensation Table
The names of the executive officers of the Company are as listed
below in the summary compensation table that sets forth the
compensation paid by Reading for the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long Term | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Compensation | |
|
Securities | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Underlying | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other | |
|
Stock | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual | |
|
Options | |
|
All Other | |
Name and Principal Position |
|
Year | |
|
Salary | |
|
Bonus | |
|
Compensation(1) | |
|
Granted | |
|
Compensation(7) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
James J. Cotter(2)
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
545,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board, |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
545,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
President and Chief |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
545,000 |
|
|
|
925,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brett Marsh(3)
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
$ |
180,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,300 |
|
|
Vice President Real Estate |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
$ |
180,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
$ |
180,000 |
|
|
$ |
50,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
$ |
4,758 |
|
Andrzej Matyczynski(3)
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
$ |
201,000 |
|
|
$ |
50,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,000 |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
$ |
189,000 |
|
|
$ |
35,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasurer |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
$ |
189,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
$ |
5,300 |
|
Robert F. Smerling(4)
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
$ |
350,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,500 |
|
|
President Domestic |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
$ |
350,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cinema Operations |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
$ |
350,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wayne Smith(5)
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
$ |
175,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
27,600 |
|
|
Executive Director |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia and New |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zealand |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Craig Tompkins(6)
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
$ |
410,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,500 |
|
|
Executive Vice President, |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
$ |
410,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director Business Affairs, |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
$ |
410,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,849 |
|
|
Chief Legal Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Secretary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Excludes other compensation if the aggregate amount is less than
$50,000, or 10% of salary plus bonus, whichever is less. |
|
(2) |
In fiscal years 2004, 2003 and 2002, Mr. Cotter was paid
directors fees of $195,000 and an annual consulting fee of
$350,000 from the Company. The Company owns a condominium in a
high-rise building located in West Hollywood, California, which
is used as an executive office, and which is personally used by
Mr. Cotter. The Companys incremental cost for
Mr. Cotters personal use of these facilities does not
exceed $50,000 or 10% of his annual consulting fee and as such,
the cost has not been included as compensation in the table, but
is included in his yearly reported compensation on IRS
Form 1099. Mr. Cotter was granted options to acquire
975,000 shares of Class A Nonvoting Common Stock on
July 11, 2002. On April 24, 2003, Mr. Cotter
surrendered 50,000 of these options previously granted to him,
so that they could be awarded to other officers of our Company.
The remaining options vest over two years in equal amounts
except for the 575,000 shares that vested immediately at
the time of grant. Mr. Cotter does not receive separate
compensation for serving as the President and Chief Executive
Officer of our Company. |
|
(3) |
Pursuant to his employment agreement, Mr. Matyczynski is
entitled to a severance payment equal to six months salary
in the event his employment is involuntarily terminated. In
addition, he is entitled to other annual compensation of $12,000
and is eligible for a discretionary bonus of up to 25% of his
base salary. Upon joining the Company, Mr. Matyczynski was
granted a loan for $33,000, which was forgiven ratably over
three years. In 2002, Mr. Matyczynski was granted options
to acquire 35,000 shares of Class A |
15
|
|
|
Nonvoting Common Stock. These options vest in equal amounts over
four years except for 7,000 shares that vested immediately
at the time of grant. |
|
(4) |
Under the terms of his employment, Mr. Smerling is entitled
to a severance payment of $175,000 in the event his employment
is involuntarily terminated. In 2003, Mr. Smerling was
granted options to acquire 25,000 shares of Class A
Nonvoting Common Stock. These options vest in equal amounts over
four years except for 18,750 which vested immediately at the
time of grant. |
|
(5) |
Under the terms of his employment, Mr. Smerling is entitled
to a severance payment equivalent to six months of salary in the
event his employment is involuntarily terminated. Mr. Smith
joined our company in April 2004; therefore he has no
compensation from our Company for 2003 or 2002. |
|
(6) |
While no formal written agreement exists as to the terms of
Mr. Tompkins employment, Mr. Tompkins is
entitled to receive his annual base salary for a period of one
year (less $40,000) in the event that his employment is
involuntarily terminated and no change of control has occurred.
Mr. Tompkins is entitled to a severance payment equal to
two years base salary (less $80,000) in the event of a change of
control. In April 2003, Mr. Tompkins was granted options to
acquire 41,000 shares of Class A Nonvoting Common
Stock. These options vest in equal amounts over four years
except for the 10,250 shares that vested immediately at the
time of grant. As of December 31, 2004, Mr. Tompkins
has a vested interest in his CRG pension plan of $165,000, which
amount accrues interest at 30 day LIBOR. |
|
(7) |
All other compensation is primarily comprised of the
employers match of the Companys 401(k) plan. |
Option/ SAR Grants In Last Fiscal Year
During 2004, the Board of Directors of the Company granted
options to the following directors and officers of the Company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potential Realizable | |
|
|
Number of | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value at Assumed Annual | |
|
|
Securities | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rates of Stock Price | |
|
|
Underlying | |
|
% of Total | |
|
Exercise | |
|
|
|
Appreciation for Option | |
|
|
Options | |
|
Options Granted | |
|
or Base | |
|
|
|
Term | |
|
|
Granted | |
|
to Employees in | |
|
Price | |
|
Expiration | |
|
| |
Name |
|
(#)(4) | |
|
Fiscal Year | |
|
($/Share) | |
|
Date | |
|
5% | |
|
10% | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Edward L. Kane(1)
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
% |
|
$ |
7.80 |
|
|
|
10/15/14 |
|
|
$ |
256,933 |
|
|
$ |
422,298 |
|
William D. Gould(1)
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
% |
|
$ |
7.80 |
|
|
|
10/15/14 |
|
|
$ |
256,933 |
|
|
$ |
422,298 |
|
|
|
(1) |
20,000 shares vested immediately on October 15, 2004. |
16
Aggregated Option/ SAR Granted or Exercised In Last Fiscal
Year and
Fiscal Year-End Option/ SAR Values
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A Nonvoting Common Stock | |
| |
|
|
Shares | |
|
|
|
Number of Securities | |
|
Value of Unexercised | |
|
|
Acquired on | |
|
Value | |
|
Underlying Unexercised | |
|
In-the-Money Options at | |
|
|
Exercise | |
|
Realized | |
|
Options at FY-End | |
|
FY-End ($)(1) | |
Name |
|
(#) | |
|
($) | |
|
Exercisable/Unexercisable | |
|
Exercisable/Unexercisable | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Eric Barr
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000/ |
|
|
$ |
117,200/ $ |
|
James J. Cotter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
925,000/ |
|
|
$ |
4,218,000/ $ |
|
James J. Cotter, Jr.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000/ |
|
|
$ |
117,200/ $ |
|
Margaret Cotter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000/ |
|
|
$ |
92,200/ $ |
|
William D. Gould
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000/ |
|
|
$ |
11,200/ $ |
|
Edward L. Kane
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000/ |
|
|
$ |
11,200/ $ |
|
Gerard P. Laheney
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000/ |
|
|
$ |
92,200/ $ |
|
Ellen Cotter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,500/ 37,500 |
|
|
$ |
163,125/ $163,125 |
|
Brett Marsh
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,500/ 6,000 |
|
|
$ |
125,040/ $27,360 |
|
Andrzej Matyczynski
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86,100/ 14,000 |
|
|
$ |
377,196/ $63,840 |
|
Robert F. Smerling
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,250/ 12,500 |
|
|
$ |
54,375/ $54,375 |
|
S. Craig Tompkins
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85,500/ 20,500 |
|
|
$ |
313,175/ $89,175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class B Voting Common Stock | |
| |
|
|
Shares | |
|
|
|
Number of Securities | |
|
Value of Unexercised | |
|
|
Acquired on | |
|
Value | |
|
Underlying Unexercised | |
|
In-the-Money Options at | |
|
|
Exercise | |
|
Realized | |
|
Options at FY-End | |
|
FY-End ($)(2) | |
Name |
|
(#) | |
|
($) | |
|
Exercisable/Unexercisable | |
|
Exercisable/Unexercisable | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
James J. Cotter
|
|
|
696,080 |
|
|
$ |
689,119 |
(2) |
|
|
137,500/ |
|
|
$ |
/ $ |
|
Margaret Cotter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,100/ |
|
|
$ |
1,320/ $ |
|
Ellen Cotter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,500/ |
|
|
$ |
/ $ |
|
|
|
(1) |
Calculated based on closing price of $8.36 as of
December 31, 2004 for Class A Stock. |
|
(2) |
Calculated based on closing price of $8.40 as of
December 30, 2004 for Class B Voting Common Stock. |
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation
Plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining Available for | |
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average | |
|
Future Issuance Under | |
|
|
Number of Securities to | |
|
Exercise Price of | |
|
Equity Compensation | |
|
|
be Issued Upon Exercise | |
|
Outstanding | |
|
Plans (Excluding | |
|
|
of Outstanding Options, | |
|
Options, Warrants | |
|
Securities Reflected in | |
|
|
Warrants and Rights | |
|
and Rights | |
|
Column (a)) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(a) | |
|
(b) | |
|
(c) | |
Plan Category |
|
Class A | |
|
Class B | |
|
Class A | |
|
Class B | |
|
Class A | |
|
Class B | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Equity compensation plans
approved by security holders
|
|
|
563,200 |
|
|
|
185,100 |
|
|
$ |
4.83 |
|
|
$ |
9.90 |
|
|
|
601,700 |
(1) |
|
|
601,700 |
(1) |
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
|
|
|
925,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,488,200 |
|
|
|
185,100 |
|
|
$ |
4.19 |
|
|
$ |
9.90 |
|
|
|
601,700 |
|
|
|
601,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The aggregate total number of shares of Class A and
Class B Stock authorized for issuance under the
Companys 1999 Stock Option Plan is 1,350,000. The
presentation above reflects the fact that the options may be
issued to acquire either Class A or Class B shares, up
to an aggregate of 1,350,000 of both classes of stock, and the
outstanding options cover, in aggregate, 748,300. |
On July 11, 2002 the Board of Directors granted
Mr. James Cotter options to acquire 975,000 shares of
Class A Nonvoting Common Stock. On April 23, 2003,
Mr. Cotter surrendered 50,000 of these options,
17
unexercised. These non-qualified stock options were granted
outside of the Companys 1999 Stock Option Plan. As such,
they have not been approved by the stockholders of the Company
and are effective without any such approval from the
stockholders. The principle terms of the option are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
exercise price: $3.80 per share, payable in cash or through
surrender of shares of Class A or Class B Stock or the
surrender of appreciated options to acquire shares of
Class A or Class B Stock; |
|
|
|
exercise period: three years, with options expiring on
July 11, 2005; |
|
|
|
vesting: 575,000 immediately, and 175,000 on July 11, 2003
and July 11, 2004; |
|
|
|
transferability: to heirs, family owned entities, and charitable
trusts. |
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider
Participation
Messrs. Gould, Laheney, and Villaseñor serve on the
Companys Compensation and Stock Options Committee.
Mr. Cotter is our controlling stockholder, and holds the
power to elect directors and to change the composition from time
to time of the Board of Directors. Accordingly, all members of
the Compensation and Stock Options Committee serve at the
pleasure of Mr. Cotter. Also, Mr. Gould is a partner
in Troy & Gould, a law firm which from time to time has
provided legal services to our Company. During 2004,
Troy & Gould was paid $45,000 in fees by our Company.
Certain Transactions and Related Party Transactions
The Initial City Cinemas Transaction. In 2000, we
acquired from Messrs. James J. Cotter and Michael Forman
and certain of their affiliates (collectively referred to here
in as Sutton Capital) a chain of Manhattan based
cinemas, known as the City Cinemas chain (the City Cinemas
Transaction). In the City Cinemas Transaction, we leased
from Sutton Capital, under a ten-year operating lease (the
Operating Lease), four cinemas, obtained certain
management rights with respect to an additional six cinemas, and
purchased the 16.7% minority membership interest in the Angelika
Film Center that we did not already own. We also obtained
certain options (referred to here collectively as the
Asset Purchase Option), exercisable in 2010, to
purchase the assets subject to the Operating Lease (including
the fee interests underlying the Murray Hill Cinema and the
Sutton Cinema) for $48,000,000, and committed to lend Sutton up
to $28,000,000 beginning in July 2007 (the Standby Line of
Credit). We paid an option fee of $5 million for the
Asset Purchase Option, which will be applied against the
exercise price if the Asset Purchase Option is exercised.
Sale of the Murray Hill Cinema Property. In February
2002, we released our leasehold and option interest in the
Murray Hill cinema (one of the Manhattan cinemas subject to the
Operating Lease and the Asset Purchase Option) in connection
with the sale of that property by Sutton Capital to a third
party developer for $10,000,000. Since the developer was only
interested in acquiring all of the various interests in the
property, and since neither we nor Sutton Capital had the right
to unilaterally sell all of such interests, it was necessary for
a transaction to be negotiated between ourselves and Sutton
Capital to take advantage of this sale opportunity. Ultimately,
agreement was reached, and we released our interest in the
property. In order to reflect that release, the rent payable
under the Operating Lease was reduced by approximately
$825,000 per year, the exercise price of the Asset Purchase
Option was decreased by $10,000,000 from $48,000,000 to
$38,000,000, and the Standby Line of Credit was reduced by
$10,000,000 from $28,000,000 to $18,000,000. In addition, we
received from the purchaser of the property the option to either
(i) acquire a 25% equity interest in the development at the
developers cost or (ii) to receive an in lieu fee of
$500,000. Ultimately, we elected to take the in lieu fee of
$500,000.
Sale of the Sutton Cinema Property. In October 2003, we
sold our leasehold and option interest in the Sutton Cinema
(another one of the Manhattan cinemas subject to the Operating
Lease and the Asset Purchase Option) to a third party developer
for $13,000,000 plus the option to either (i) acquire up to
a 25% equity interest in the development at the developers
cost or (ii) to receive an in lieu fee of $650,000. Sutton
Capital simultaneously sold its fee interest in the property for
$5,000,000. Again, since the developer was only interested in
acquiring all of the various interests in the property and since
neither we nor Sutton had the legal right to unilaterally sell
all of the various interests, it was again necessary for a
transaction to be negotiated
18
between ourselves and Sutton to take advantage of this sale
opportunity Ultimately agreement was reached and the
$18 million purchase price offered by the purchaser was
allocated $13,000,000 to ourselves and $5,000,000 to Sutton
Capital, the rent payable under the Operating Lease was reduced
by approximately $697,920 per year, the exercise price of
the Asset Purchase Option was decreased by $5,000,000 from
$38,000,000 to $33,000,000, and the Standby Line of Credit was
reduced by $5,000,000 from $18,000,000 to $13,000,000. We also
agreed to bring forward the earliest date on which loan monies
could be drawn down under the Standby Line of Credit from July
2007 to September 2004. Sutton Capital has to date drawn down
$8,000,000 of the $13,000,000 available on the Standby Line of
Credit. It is currently anticipated that the remainder will not
be drawn down until July 2007. Also, we agreed that if we do not
exercise our Asset Purchase Option, all principal amounts
outstanding under the Standby Line of Credit will be forgiven.
Sutton Redevelopment Investment. On September 14,
2004, we acquired for $2.3 million a non-managing
membership interest in 205-209 East 57th Street Associates, LLC
a limited liability company formed to redevelop our former
cinema site at 205 East 57th Street in Manhattan. Our membership
interest represents a 25% interest in the LLC, and was issued to
us by 205-209 East 57th Street Associates, LLC in consideration
of a capital contribution equal to 25% of its total book
capital, calculated after taking into account the effect of our
capital contribution. In December 2004, a capital call of
$2,877,000 was made to make up the shortfall in equity resulting
from higher than budgeted cost for the redevelopment project.
In order not to dilute our 25% interest we decided to increase
our capital contribution by $719,000 as requested and will make
this payment in the first quarter of 2005.
Cinemas 1, 2 & 3 Land Acquisition. On
August 4, 2004, we entered into an agreement to purchase
for $12 million the approximately 7,840 square-foot
fee interest underlying our current leasehold estate in the
Cinemas 1, 2 & 3 property located in Manhattan on
3rd Avenue between 58th Street and 59th Street. The
ownership of the Cinemas 1, 2 & 3 property is
currently divided into three components: the fee interest (which
we now have under contract to purchase); the ground lease and
improvements (which are owned by Sutton Hill Capital LLC but
which we, have an option to purchase as a part of a pool of
assets in 2010); and our current space lease which also runs
until 2010. We are currently in negotiations with Sutton Capital
to acquire immediately Sutton Capitals ground lease
interest in the property and its proprietary interest in the
building and other improvements on the land, and have agreed in
principal that, as a part of the transaction, Sutton Capital
will have an option to acquire at cost up to a 25% non-managing
membership interest in the limited liability company that we
have formed to take title to the property. These negotiations
are ongoing, and any potential transaction will ultimately be
subject to review and approval by the Conflicts Committee of our
Board of Directors. In connection with these negotiations, the
parties are also discussing an early acquisition of Sutton
Capitals interest in the Village East Cinema. As of
December 31, 2004, we had deposited earnest money totaling
$800,000 into escrow with respect to the purchase of the fee
interest. In January, the purchase price was increased to
$12.2 million and the deposit was increased to
$4.0 million in consideration of an extension of the
closing date to June 1, 2005.
OBI Management Agreement. Our live theater operations are
managed by OBI Management, which is wholly owned by Margaret
Cotter, the daughter of James J. Cotter and one of our
directors, pursuant to a theater management agreement (the
Management Agreement).
The Management Agreement generally provides that we will pay OBI
Management a combination of fixed and incentive fees, which
historically have equated to slightly less than 20% of the net
cash flow from our live theaters in New York. Since the fixed
fees with respect to our New York theatres are applicable only
during such periods as they are booked, OBI Management receives
no compensation with respect to our New York theaters at any
time when they are not generating revenues. We believe that this
arrangement provides an incentive to OBI Management to keep the
theaters booked with the best available shows, and mitigates the
negative cash flow that would result from having an empty
theater. In addition, OBI Management manages our Royal George
live theater complex in Chicago on a fixed fee basis. In 2004,
OBI Management earned $419,000 (including $35,000 for managing
the Royal George). In 2003, OBI Management earned $400,000
(including $35,000 for managing the Royal George). By
comparison, in the year immediately prior to our
19
acquisition of the New York Theaters, the prior owners paid
approximately $385,000 for management services with respect to
the three New York theaters.
OBI Management operates from our offices in New York City on a
rent-free basis and we share the cost of one OBI Management
administrative employee located at those offices. Other than
these expenses and travel-related expenses for OBI Management
personnel to travel to Chicago as referred to above, OBI
Management is responsible for all of its costs and expenses
relating to the performance of its management functions. The
Management Agreement will expire on December 31, 2005, but
will renew automatically for successive one-year periods unless
either party gives at least six months prior notice of
intention to allow the Management Agreement to expire. The
Management Agreement is terminable at any time by the Company
for cause.
Prior to the time we acquired our New York theatres in 2000,
these theaters were managed by Union Square Management, Inc., a
company in which Ms. Cotter was employed, but which was
owned by parties unrelated to Mr. Cotter. OBI Management
took over management of the New York theaters live theaters
shortly before we acquired them, and from the time of that
transaction until March 13, 2003, OBI Management provided
such management services on an at will basis and on
generally the same terms, including terms related to
compensation, as such services had previously been provided by
Union Square Management, Inc. Accordingly, our Conflicts
Committee took into account the cost of this management
structure at the time it approved our acquisition of these
theaters.
The current Management Agreement was approved by the our Audit
and Conflicts Committee on March 13, 2003, and has been
applied retroactively to January 1, 2002. The Management
Agreement is substantially similar to the prior owners
arrangement with Union Square Management, Inc., except that:
|
|
|
|
|
it has been expanded to include the management of the Royal
George Theater Complex on a flat-fee basis; |
|
|
|
the cost of any new capital improvements to the New York
theaters will be amortized over the life of those improvement
consistent with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles for
purposes of calculating net cash flow from the theaters rather
than being expensed in the year incurred; and |
|
|
|
in those cases where we assist in the financing of plays
appearing in our theaters, any profits and losses to us
resulting from such financing will be factored in by calculating
theater cash flow for purposes of determining OBI
Managements incentive compensation. |
Investment in Live Theater Production. During the second
quarter of 2002, the Company invested approximately $85,000 for
a 25% interest in I Love You, Youre Perfect, Now
Change, a production in our Royal George Theater. Sutton
Hill Capital, LLC, which is owned 50% by Mr. James J.
Cotter (the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of
Reading), also made a 25% investment in this production. This
production has distributed to the Company approximately $137,000
allowing the Company to fully recoup its initial investment.
|
|
|
Certain Family Relationships |
Mr. James J. Cotter, Sr., our controlling stockholder,
has advised the Board of Directors that he considers his
holdings in our Company to be long-term investments to be passed
to his heirs. The Directors believe that it is in the best
interests of our Company and our stockholders, for his heirs to
become experienced in the operations and affairs of the Company.
Accordingly, all of Mr. Cotters children are
currently involved with our Company.
20
|
|
|
Certain Miscellaneous Transactions |
Our Company has loaned to Mr. Smerling $70,000 pursuant to
a demand loan.
Performance Graph
The information set forth below shall not be deemed incorporated
by reference by any general statement incorporating by reference
the Proxy Statement into any filing under the Securities Act of
1933 or under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the
extent the Company incorporates this information by reference,
and shall not otherwise be deemed soliciting material or be
deemed filed under such Acts.
The following line graph compares the cumulative total
stockholder return on Reading International, Inc.s common
stock for the years ended December 31, 2000, 2001, 2002,
2003 and 2004 against the cumulative total return as calculated
by the Center for Research in Securities Prices
(CRSP) of the American Stock Exchange
(AMEX) and the motion picture theater operator group
and the real estate operator group.
COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*
AMONG READING INTERNATIONAL, INC., THE AMEX MARKET VALUE
(U.S. & FOREIGN) INDEX,
A REAL ESTATE OPERATORS GROUP AND A
MOTION PICTURE THEATER OPERATORS GROUP
|
|
* |
$100 invested on 12/31/99 in stock or index
including reinvestment of dividends.
Fiscal year ending December 31. |
INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
Our independent public accountants, Deloitte & Touche,
LLP, have audited our Companys books for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2004, and are expected to have a
representative present at the Annual Meeting who will have the
opportunity to make a statement if such representative desires
to do so and is expected to be available to respond to
appropriate questions.
Audit Fees
The aggregate fees incurred by the Company for
Deloitte & Touche, LLP for professional services
rendered for the audit of our 2004 financial statements, audit
of internal controls related to the Sarbanes-Oxley
21
Act of 2002, and the reviews of the financial statements
included in our Companys Form 10-Q for 2004 were
approximately $630,000, and for the audit of our 2003 financial
statements and reviews of the financial statements included in
our Companys Form 10Q for 2003 were $271,000.
Audit Related Fees
The aggregate fees incurred by the Company in each of 2004 and
2003 for assurance and related services provided by
Deloitte & Touche, LLP that are reasonably related to
the performance of the audit or review of our financial
statements and that are not reported under the caption
Audit Fees immediately above were
approximately $99,000 and $98,265, respectively.
Tax Fees
The aggregate fees incurred by the Company in each of 2004 and
2003 for products and services for tax compliance, tax advice,
and tax planning provided by Deloitte & Touche, LLP
were $128,000 and $103,000, respectively.
Financial Information Systems Design and Implementation
Fees
No fees were billed by Deloitte & Touche, LLP for 2004
or 2003 for financial information systems design and
implementation fees.
All Other Fees
The aggregate fees incurred by the Company for 2003 for services
provided by Deloitte & Touche, LLP other than as set
forth above were $6,000. For 2004, no other fees were billed by
Deloitte and Touche, LLP for services other than set forth above.
Compatibility of Fees with Independent Accountants
Independence
Our Audit Committee has determined that the provision of
services covered under the subheading All Other Fees
above is compatible with maintaining Deloitte & Touche,
LLPs independence. The Company has adopted policies and
procedures for the pre-approval of audit services and permitted
non-audit services during fiscal 2003.
Annual Report
A copy of our Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for
its fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 is being provided
with this Proxy Statement.
Stockholder Communications with Directors
It is the policy of our Board of Directors that any
communications sent to the attention of any one or more of our
directors care of our executive offices, or deposited in any of
the Suggestion Boxes maintained at our principal
administrative offices in Los Angeles, Manhattan and Melbourne,
Australia, will be promptly forwarded to such directors. Such
communications will not be opened or reviewed by any of our
officers or employees, or by any other director, unless they are
requested to do so by the addressee of any such communication.
Likewise, the content of any telephone messages left for any one
or more of our directors (including, any call-back number, if
any) will be promptly forwarded to that director.
Stockholder Proposals and Director Nominations
Any stockholder who, in accordance with and subject to the
provisions of the proxy rules of the SEC, wishes to submit a
proposal for inclusion in our Companys proxy statement for
its 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, must deliver such
proposal in writing to the Secretary of the Company at the new
address of our Companys principal executive offices at
500 Citadel Drive, Suite D-300, City of Commerce,
California 90040. Unless we change the date of our annual
meeting by more than 30 days, then such written proposal
22
must be delivered to us no later than January 26, 2006. If
we are not notified of a stockholder proposal by that date, the
proxies that we hold may confer discretionary authority to vote
against such stockholder proposal, even though such proposal is
not discussed in our proxy statement for that meeting.
Our Board of Directors will consider written nominations for
directors from stockholders. Nominations for the election of
directors made by our stockholders must be made by written
notice delivered to the Secretary of our Company at our
Companys principal executive offices not less than
120 days prior to the first anniversary of the immediately
preceding annual meeting of our stockholders at which directors
are elected. Such written notice must set forth the name, age,
address and principal occupation or employment of such nominee,
the number of shares of our Companys Common Stock
beneficially owned by such nominee and such other information as
is required by the proxy rules of the SEC with respect to a
nominee of the Board of Directors.
Under our governing documents and applicable Nevada law, our
stockholders may also directly nominate candidate from the floor
at any meeting of our stockholders held at which directors are
to be elected.
Other Matters
We do not know of any other matters to be presented for
consideration other than the matters described in the Notice of
Annual Meeting, but if any matters are properly presented, it is
the intention of the persons named in the accompany proxy to
vote on such matters in accordance with their judgment.
23
DELIVERY OF PROXY MATERIALS TO HOUSEHOLDS
As permitted by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, only one
copy of the proxy materials are being delivered to our
stockholders residing at the same address, unless such
stockholders have notified the Company of their desire to
receive multiple copies of the proxy materials.
We will promptly deliver without charge, upon oral or written
request, a separate copy of the proxy materials to any
stockholder residing at an address to which only one copy was
mailed. Requests for additional copies should be directed to our
Corporate Secretary or Assistant Corporate Secretary by phone at
(213) 235-2236 or by mail to Secretary, Reading
International, Inc., 550 S. Hope Street,
Suite 1825, Los Angeles, California 90071.
Stockholders residing at the same address and currently
receiving only one copy of the proxy materials may contact the
Corporate Secretary or Assistant Corporate Secretary by phone at
(213) 235-2236 or by mail to Secretary, Reading
International, Inc., 550 S. Hope Street,
Suite 1825, Los Angeles, California 90071, to request
multiple copies of the proxy materials in the future. After
May 30, 2005, all correspondence should be mailed to the
new address of our principal executive offices: 500 Citadel
Drive, Suite D-300, City of Commerce, California 90040.
|
|
|
By Order of the Board of Directors, |
|
|
|
|
James J. Cotter, Chairman |
Dated: May 6, 2005
24
READING INTERNATIONAL, INC.
PROXY FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD MAY 26, 2005
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The undersigned hereby
appoints James J. Cotter and S. Craig Tompkins, and each of
them, the attorneys, agents and proxies of the undersigned, with full
powers of substitution to each, to attend and act as proxy or proxies
of the undersigned at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Reading
International, Inc. to be held at the Four Seasons Hotel Los Angeles
at Beverly Hills, 300 South Doheny Drive, Los Angeles,
California, on Thursday, May 26, 2005 at 11:00 a.m., and
at, and with respect to, any and all adjournments or postponements
thereof, and to vote as specified herein the number of shares which
the undersigned, if personally present, would be entitled to vote.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE ELECTION OF DIRECTORS NOMINATED BY THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS. THE PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED
AS DIRECTED. IF NO DIRECTION IS MADE, IT WILL BE VOTED FOR THE
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS NOMINATED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS.
PLEASE SIGN AND DATE ON REVERSE SIDE
6 DETACH
PROXY CARD
HERE 6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
|
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS |
|
c |
|
FOR all nominees listed below (except as indicated to
the contrary below). |
|
c |
|
WITHHOLD AUTHORITY to vote for all nominees listed below |
|
c |
|
EXCEPTIONS |
|
|
|
Director Nominees: James J. Cotter, Eric
Barr, James J. Cotter, Jr., Margaret Cotter, William D. Gould,
Edward L. Kane, Gerard P. Laheney, and Alfred Villaseñor, Jr. |
(INSTRUCTIONS: To withhold authority to vote for
any individual nominee mark the Exceptions box and write
that nominees name on the space below.) |
|
EXCEPTIONS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
|
OTHER BUSINESS. In their discretion, the proxies are authorized
to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the
meeting and at, and with respect to, any and all adjournments or
postponements thereof. The Board of Directors at present knows of no
other business to be presented by or on behalf of the Company or the
Board of Directors at the meeting. |
|
I (WE) WILL c WILL NOT c ATTEND THE MEETING IN
PERSON. |
|
|
|
|
|
The undersigned hereby ratifies and confirms all
that the attorneys and proxies, or any of them, or their substitutes,
shall lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof, and hereby
revokes any and all proxies heretofore given by the undersigned to
vote at the meeting. The undersigned acknowledges receipt of the
Notice of Annual Meeting and the Proxy Statement accompanying such
notice. |
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: |
|
|
, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
Signature |
|
|
|
|
|
Signature |
|
|
|
|
Please date this proxy
card and sign above exactly as your name appears on this card. Joint
owners should each sign personally. Corporate proxies should be
signed by an authorized officer. Executors, administrators, trustee,
etc., should give their full titles. |
3
Please Detach Here
You Must Detach This Portion of the Proxy
Card Before Returning it in the Enclosed Envelope
3
6