Financial Institutions, Inc. 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED March 31, 2008
Commission File Number 0-26481
(Exact Name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
NEW YORK
|
|
16-0816610 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
|
|
|
220 Liberty Street Warsaw, NY
|
|
14569 |
|
|
|
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrants Telephone Number Including Area Code:
(585) 786-1100
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject
to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
YES o NO þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date.
|
|
|
CLASS
|
|
OUTSTANDING AS OF APRIL 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
Common Stock, $0.01 par value
|
|
10,968,360 shares |
FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, INC.
FORM 10-Q
INDEX
2
Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited)
FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
49,460 |
|
|
$ |
45,165 |
|
Federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits in other banks |
|
|
53,539 |
|
|
|
1,508 |
|
Securities available for sale, at fair value |
|
|
688,504 |
|
|
|
695,241 |
|
Securities held to maturity, at amortized cost (fair value of $58,238 and $59,902 as of
March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively) |
|
|
57,631 |
|
|
|
59,479 |
|
Loans held for sale |
|
|
1,099 |
|
|
|
906 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
|
972,444 |
|
|
|
964,173 |
|
Less: Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
15,549 |
|
|
|
15,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net |
|
|
956,895 |
|
|
|
948,652 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment, net |
|
|
33,611 |
|
|
|
34,157 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
37,369 |
|
|
|
37,369 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
34,544 |
|
|
|
35,399 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,912,652 |
|
|
$ |
1,857,876 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities And Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing demand |
|
$ |
268,419 |
|
|
$ |
286,362 |
|
Interest-bearing demand, savings and money market |
|
|
736,925 |
|
|
|
681,953 |
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
622,628 |
|
|
|
607,656 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
1,627,972 |
|
|
|
1,575,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
27,835 |
|
|
|
25,643 |
|
Long-term borrowings |
|
|
25,799 |
|
|
|
25,865 |
|
Junior subordinated debentures issued to unconsolidated
subsidiary trust (Junior subordinated debentures) |
|
|
16,702 |
|
|
|
16,702 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
16,980 |
|
|
|
18,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,715,288 |
|
|
|
1,662,554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3% cumulative preferred stock, $100 par value,
authorized 10,000 shares, issued and outstanding 1,586 shares
as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 |
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
8.48% cumulative preferred stock, $100 par value,
authorized 200,000 shares, issued and outstanding 174,223 shares
as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 |
|
|
17,422 |
|
|
|
17,422 |
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value, authorized 50,000,000 shares, issued
11,348,122 shares as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 |
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
24,105 |
|
|
|
24,778 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
160,328 |
|
|
|
158,744 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
2,104 |
|
|
|
667 |
|
Treasury stock, at cost 355,673 and 336,971 shares as of March 31, 2008 and
December 31, 2007, respectively |
|
|
(6,867 |
) |
|
|
(6,561 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
197,364 |
|
|
|
195,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
1,912,652 |
|
|
$ |
1,857,876 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and fees on loans |
|
$ |
16,728 |
|
|
$ |
16,627 |
|
Interest and dividends on securities |
|
|
8,234 |
|
|
|
8,427 |
|
Other interest income |
|
|
310 |
|
|
|
752 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
25,272 |
|
|
|
25,806 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
9,236 |
|
|
|
10,763 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
169 |
|
Long-term borrowings |
|
|
367 |
|
|
|
486 |
|
Junior subordinated debentures |
|
|
432 |
|
|
|
432 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
10,187 |
|
|
|
11,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
15,085 |
|
|
|
13,956 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
716 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
|
|
14,369 |
|
|
|
13,956 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges on deposits |
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
2,569 |
|
ATM and debit card income |
|
|
752 |
|
|
|
620 |
|
Broker-dealer fees and commissions |
|
|
459 |
|
|
|
383 |
|
Loan servicing |
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
205 |
|
Corporate owned life insurance |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
Net gain on sale or call of securities |
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain on sale of loans held for sale |
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
Net gain on sale of other assets |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
Net gain on sale of trust relationships |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
Other |
|
|
454 |
|
|
|
710 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest income |
|
|
4,744 |
|
|
|
4,738 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits |
|
|
8,436 |
|
|
|
8,354 |
|
Occupancy and equipment |
|
|
2,580 |
|
|
|
2,448 |
|
Supplies and postage |
|
|
441 |
|
|
|
438 |
|
Amortization of other intangible assets |
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
Computer and data processing |
|
|
581 |
|
|
|
457 |
|
Professional fees and services |
|
|
557 |
|
|
|
495 |
|
Advertising and promotions |
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
220 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,451 |
|
|
|
1,439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense |
|
|
14,273 |
|
|
|
13,928 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
4,840 |
|
|
|
4,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
1,061 |
|
|
|
1,151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
3,779 |
|
|
$ |
3,615 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share (note 3): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
See Accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3% |
|
|
8.48% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
(Dollars in thousands, |
|
Preferred |
|
|
Preferred |
|
|
Common |
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Shareholders |
|
except per share amounts) |
|
Stock |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
159 |
|
|
$ |
17,422 |
|
|
$ |
113 |
|
|
$ |
24,778 |
|
|
$ |
158,744 |
|
|
$ |
667 |
|
|
$ |
(6,561 |
) |
|
$ |
195,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase 70,202 shares of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,304 |
) |
|
|
(1,304 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issue 51,500 shares of common stock
restricted stock awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(998 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of unvested stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of unvested restricted stock awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of adoption of EITF 06-04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(284 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(284 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,779 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,779 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gain on securities available
for sale (net of tax of $844) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification adjustment for net gains
included in net income (net of tax of $67) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined benefit pension plan (net of tax of $1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Postretirement benefit plan (net of tax of $(5)) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3% Preferred $0.75 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.48% Preferred $2.12 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(370 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(370 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common $0.14 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,540 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,540 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance March 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
159 |
|
|
$ |
17,422 |
|
|
$ |
113 |
|
|
$ |
24,105 |
|
|
$ |
160,328 |
|
|
$ |
2,104 |
|
|
$ |
(6,867 |
) |
|
$ |
197,364 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
3,779 |
|
|
$ |
3,615 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
988 |
|
|
|
971 |
|
Net amortization of premiums and discounts on securities |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
716 |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of unvested stock-based compensation |
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
Deferred income tax expense |
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
Proceeds from sale of loans held for sale |
|
|
11,644 |
|
|
|
11,720 |
|
Originations of loans held for sale |
|
|
(11,673 |
) |
|
|
(11,644 |
) |
Net gain on sale or call of securities |
|
|
(173 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net gain on sale of loans held for sale |
|
|
(164 |
) |
|
|
(161 |
) |
Net gain on sale and disposal of other assets |
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
(57 |
) |
Net gain on sale of trust relationships |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
(Increase) decrease in other assets |
|
|
(329 |
) |
|
|
451 |
|
Decrease in other liabilities |
|
|
(1,715 |
) |
|
|
(1,383 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
3,570 |
|
|
|
3,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale |
|
|
(121,256 |
) |
|
|
(59,257 |
) |
Held to maturity |
|
|
(5,973 |
) |
|
|
(6,241 |
) |
Proceeds from maturity, call and principal pay-down of securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale |
|
|
97,240 |
|
|
|
39,356 |
|
Held to maturity |
|
|
7,485 |
|
|
|
5,413 |
|
Proceeds from sale or call of securities available for sale |
|
|
33,436 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net loan originations |
|
|
(9,075 |
) |
|
|
(3,373 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of other assets |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
428 |
|
Proceeds from sale of trust relationships |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
Purchase of premises and equipment |
|
|
(368 |
) |
|
|
(672 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
1,739 |
|
|
|
(24,333 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in deposits |
|
|
52,001 |
|
|
|
54,067 |
|
Net increase (decrease) in short-term borrowings |
|
|
2,192 |
|
|
|
(7,450 |
) |
Repayment of long-term borrowings |
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
Purchase of preferred and common shares |
|
|
(1,304 |
) |
|
|
(1,625 |
) |
Stock options exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
137 |
|
Excess tax benefit from stock options exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(1,805 |
) |
|
|
(1,392 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
51,017 |
|
|
|
43,726 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
56,326 |
|
|
|
23,307 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents as of the beginning of the period |
|
|
46,673 |
|
|
|
109,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents as of the end of the period |
|
$ |
102,999 |
|
|
$ |
133,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during period for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
10,228 |
|
|
$ |
10,734 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncash investing and financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate and other assets acquired in settlement of loans |
|
$ |
118 |
|
|
$ |
470 |
|
Dividends declared and unpaid |
|
|
1,912 |
|
|
|
1,504 |
|
Net (decrease) increase in unsettled security purchases |
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
7,721 |
|
See Accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
6
FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(1) Basis of Presentation
Financial Institutions, Inc. (FII), a bank holding company organized under the laws of New York
State, and its subsidiaries (collectively the Company) provide deposit, lending and other
financial services to individuals and businesses in Central and Western New York State. The
Company is subject to regulation by certain federal and state agencies.
FIIs primary subsidiary is its New York State-chartered Five Star Bank (100% owned) (FSB or the
Bank). In addition, FII formerly qualified as a financial holding company under the
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, which allowed the expansion of business operations to include a
broker-dealer subsidiary, namely, Five Star Investment Services, Inc. (100% owned) (FSIS).
During 2003, FII terminated its financial holding company status and now operates as a bank holding
company. The change in status did not affect the broker-dealer subsidiary or activities being
conducted by the Company, although future acquisition or expansion of non-financial activities may
require prior Federal Reserve Bank (FRB) approval and will be limited to those that are
permissible for bank holding companies.
FII formed the FISI Statutory Trust I (100% owned) (the Trust) in February 2001 to facilitate the
private placement of $16.2 million in capital securities (trust preferred securities). FII
capitalized the Trust with a $502,000 investment in the Trusts common securities. The Trust is a
variable interest entity as defined by Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation
No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, and, as such, the Trust is accounted for as
an unconsolidated subsidiary. Therefore, the Companys consolidated statements of financial
position reflect the $16.7 million in junior subordinated debentures as a liability and the
$502,000 investment in the Trusts common securities is included in other assets.
In managements opinion, the interim consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments
necessary for a fair presentation. The results of operations for the interim periods are not
necessarily indicative of the results of operations to be expected for the full year ended December
31, 2008. The interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the
Companys 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The consolidated financial information included herein
combines the results of operations, the assets, liabilities and shareholders equity of FII and its
subsidiaries. All significant inter-company transactions and balances have been eliminated in
consolidation.
The interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America and prevailing practices in the
banking industry. In preparing the financial statements, management is required to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities, and the reported revenues and expenses for the period. Current
market conditions increase the risk and uncertainty associated with these estimates and assumptions
and, although management uses its best judgment, actual results could differ from those estimates.
Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to near-term change are the allowance for loan
losses and the valuation of the securities portfolio.
Amounts in the prior periods consolidated financial statements are reclassified when necessary to
conform to the current periods presentation.
(2) Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring
fair value under generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. SFAS No. 157 emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement, not an
entity-specific measurement, and states that a fair value measurement should be determined based on
assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. The Company
adopted this statement on January 1, 2008 and the required disclosures are included in Note 4.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit
Pension and Other Postretirement Plans an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and
132(R). SFAS No. 158 requires companies to recognize the over-funded or under-funded status of a
defined benefit postretirement plan (other than a multi-employer plan) as an asset or liability in
its balance sheet and to recognize changes in that funded status in the year in which the changes
occur through comprehensive income. The Company adopted this provision of SFAS No. 158 for the
year ended December 31, 2006. SFAS No. 158 also requires companies to measure the funded status of
a plan as of the date of the companys fiscal year-end, with limited exceptions. The Company is
7
required and plans to adopt this provision of SFAS No. 158 for the fiscal year ending December 31,
2008 and does not expect adoption to have a material effect on its consolidated financial position,
consolidated results of operations, or liquidity.
In September 2006, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) reached a final consensus on Issue
06-04, Accounting for Deferred Compensation and Postretirement Benefit Aspects of Endorsement
Split Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements (EITF 06-04). In accordance with EITF 06-04, an
agreement by an employer to share a portion of the proceeds of a life insurance policy with an
employee during the postretirement period is a postretirement benefit arrangement required to be
accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 106 or Accounting Principles Board Opinion (APB) No.
12, Omnibus Opinion 1967. Furthermore, the purchase of a split dollar life insurance policy
does not constitute a settlement under SFAS No. 106 and, therefore, a liability for the
postretirement obligation must be recognized under SFAS No. 106 if the benefit is offered under an
arrangement that constitutes a plan or under APB No. 12 if it is not part of a plan. The
provisions of EITF 06-04 are to be applied through either a cumulative-effect adjustment to
retained earnings as of the beginning of the year of adoption or retrospective application. The
Company adopted this statement on January 1, 2008 and recorded a liability (included in other
liabilities in the consolidated statement of financial position) of $284,000 and a corresponding
cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as disclosed in the consolidated statement of
changes in shareholders equity and other comprehensive income.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities, including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115. SFAS No. 159 allows
entities to irrevocably elect fair value as the initial and subsequent measurement attribute for
certain financial assets and financial liabilities that are not otherwise required to be measured
at fair value, with changes in fair value recognized in earnings as they occur. SFAS No. 159 also
requires entities to report those financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value
in a manner that separates those reported fair values from the carrying amounts of similar assets
and liabilities measured using another measurement attribute on the face of the statement of
financial condition. Lastly, SFAS No. 159 establishes presentation and disclosure requirements
designed to improve comparability between entities that elect different measurement attributes for
similar assets and liabilities. The Company adopted this statement on January 1, 2008 and did not
elect the SFAS No. 159 fair value option for any of its financial assets or liabilities, therefore
the adoption did not have an impact on its consolidated financial position, consolidated results of
operations, or liquidity.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), Business Combinations (revised 2007). SFAS
No. 141(R) is a revision to previously existing guidance on accounting for business combinations.
The statement retains the fundamental concept of the purchase method of accounting and introduces
new requirements for the recognition and measurement of assets acquired, liabilities assumed and
noncontrolling interests. The Company is required to adopt this statement for its fiscal year
beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company plans to adopt this statement on January 1, 2009
and does not expect adoption to have a material effect on its consolidated financial position,
consolidated results of operations, or liquidity.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements. SFAS No. 160 requires that noncontrolling interests be reported as stockholders
equity and establishes a single method of accounting for changes in a parents ownership interest
in a subsidiary as long as that ownership change does not result in deconsolidation. The Company
is required to adopt this statement for its fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2008. The
Company plans to adopt this statement on January 1, 2009 and does not expect adoption to have a
material effect on its consolidated financial position, consolidated results of operations, or
liquidity.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133. The statement requires enhanced disclosures
regarding the use of derivative instruments, the accounting for derivative instruments under SFAS
No. 133 and related interpretations, and the impact of derivative instruments and related hedged
items on financial position, financial performance, and cash flows, particularly from a risk
perspective. SFAS No. 161 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. The
Company plans to adopt this statement on January 1, 2009 and does not expect adoption to have a
material effect on its consolidated financial position, consolidated results of operations, or
liquidity.
8
(3) Earnings Per Common Share
Basic earnings per common share, after giving effect to preferred stock dividends, has been
computed using weighted average common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share reflect the
effects, if any, of incremental common shares issuable upon exercise of dilutive stock options.
Earnings per common share have been computed based on the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
3,779 |
|
|
$ |
3,615 |
|
Less: Preferred stock dividends |
|
|
371 |
|
|
|
371 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common shareholders |
|
$ |
3,408 |
|
|
$ |
3,244 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares used to
calculate basic earnings per common share |
|
|
10,938 |
|
|
|
11,317 |
|
Add: Effect of common stock equivalents |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares used to
calculate diluted earnings per common share |
|
|
10,975 |
|
|
|
11,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
There were approximately 380,327 and 270,132 weighted average common stock equivalents from
outstanding stock options for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, that
were not considered in the calculation of diluted earnings per share since their effect would have
been anti-dilutive.
(4) Fair Value Accounting
Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS No. 157, which defines fair value, establishes
a consistent framework for measuring fair value and expands the disclosure requirements related to
fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value as the exchange price that would be
received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most
advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market
participants on the measurement date. In accordance with FASB Staff Position No. 157-2, Effective
Date of FASB Statement No. 157, the Company delayed the application of SFAS No. 157 for
nonfinancial assets, such as goodwill, and nonfinancial liabilities until January 1, 2009.
Depending on the nature of the asset or liability, the Company uses various valuation techniques
and assumptions when estimating fair value. SFAS No. 157 requires an entity to maximize the use of
observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.
Accordingly, the Company applied the following fair value hierarchy:
Level 1 Inputs Level 1 inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for assets or
liabilities identical to those to be reported at fair value. An active market is a market in which
transactions occur for the item to be fair valued with sufficient frequency and volume to provide
pricing information on an ongoing basis.
Level 2 Inputs Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 inputs
that are observable either directly or indirectly. These inputs include: (a) Quoted prices for
similar assets or liabilities in active markets; (b) Quoted prices for identical or similar assets
or liabilities in markets that are not active, such as when there are few transactions for the
asset or liability, the prices are not current, price quotations vary substantially over time or in
which little information is released publicly; (c) Inputs other than quoted prices that are
observable for the asset or liability; and (d) Inputs that are derived principally from or
corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.
Level 3 Inputs Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for an asset or liability. These inputs
should be used to determine fair value only when observable inputs are not available. Unobservable
inputs should be developed based on the best information available in the circumstances, which
might include internally generated data and assumptions being used to price the asset or liability.
9
When determining the fair value measurements for assets required or permitted to be recorded at
and/or marked to fair value, the Company considers the principal or most advantageous market in
which it would transact and considers assumptions that market participants would use when pricing
the asset or liability. When possible, the Company looks to active and observable markets to price
identical assets. When identical assets are not traded in active markets, the Company looks to
market observable data for similar assets. Nevertheless, certain assets are not actively traded in
observable markets and the Company must use alternative valuation techniques to derive a fair value
measurement.
The Company measures or monitors certain of its assets on either a recurring or nonrecurring fair
value basis. Fair value is used on a recurring basis for securities available for sale, as fair
value is the primary basis of accounting for these securities. Additionally, fair value is used on
a nonrecurring basis to evaluate certain assets for impairment. Examples of these nonrecurring
uses of fair value include: loans held for sale, mortgage servicing assets, impaired loans, other
real estate owned (ORE) and repossessed assets.
Assets measured and recorded at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2008 are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets Measured and Recorded at Fair Value |
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Total |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale |
|
$ |
688,504 |
|
|
$ |
976 |
|
|
$ |
655,092 |
|
|
$ |
32,436 |
|
The following table shows a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for assets measured
at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements |
|
|
|
Using Significant |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Unobservable Inputs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale (level 3), beginning of period |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers into level 3 |
|
|
33,850 |
|
Sale |
|
|
(1,000 |
) |
Unrealized losses included in other comprehensive income |
|
|
(414 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale (level 3), end of period |
|
$ |
32,436 |
|
|
|
|
|
Assets measured and recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis during the three months ended
March 31, 2008 are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets Measured and Recorded at Fair Value |
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2008 |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Total |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans (collateral dependent) |
|
$ |
1,275 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,275 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
ORE and repossessed assets |
|
|
451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
451 |
|
|
|
|
|
The amount of totals gains or losses included in earnings attributable to assets measured at fair
value on a nonrecurring basis during the three months ended March 31, 2008 was not significant.
The following summarizes the valuation technique for assets measured and recorded at fair value:
Securities available for sale. Fair value is generally based on quoted market prices or quoted
market prices for similar assets and liabilities. If these market prices are not available, fair
values are estimated based on dealer quotes, pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or
similar techniques for which the determination of fair value may require significant judgment or
estimation. The securities valued using unobservable inputs were the auction-rate preferred equity
securities as the financial and capital markets have experienced significant dislocation and
illiquidity in regard to this type of instrument and there is currently no secondary market for
this type of security. The Company obtained third-party dealer quotes that were derived by the
dealer obtaining price quotes for identical preferred equity securities not held in a trust and
adjusting those prices to reflect the rate-capped trust structure of the instruments owned by the
Company.
Impaired
loans (collateral dependent). Fair value is determined based upon estimates of the value of the collateral
underlying the impaired loans.
10
ORE and repossessed assets. Fair value is determined based on third party appraisals of comparable
property or valuation guides at the time title to the property is obtained.
(5) Loans
Loans outstanding, including net unearned income and net deferred fees and costs of $6.5 million
and $5.9 million as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, are summarized as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
144,976 |
|
|
$ |
136,780 |
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
245,148 |
|
|
|
245,797 |
|
Agricultural |
|
|
44,162 |
|
|
|
47,367 |
|
Residential real estate |
|
|
168,738 |
|
|
|
166,863 |
|
Consumer indirect |
|
|
142,565 |
|
|
|
134,977 |
|
Consumer direct and home equity |
|
|
226,855 |
|
|
|
232,389 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
|
972,444 |
|
|
|
964,173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(15,549 |
) |
|
|
(15,521 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net |
|
$ |
956,895 |
|
|
$ |
948,652 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys significant concentrations of credit risk in the loan portfolio relates to a
geographic concentration in the communities that the Company serves.
Parts of the country have experienced a significant decline in real estate values that has led, in
some cases, to the debt on the real estate exceeding the value of the real estate. Generally, the
Western and Central New York State markets the Company serves have not experienced, to this point,
such conditions. Should deterioration in real estate values in the markets we serve occur, the
value and liquidity of real estate securing the Companys loans could become impaired. While the
Company is not engaged in the business of sub-prime lending, a decline in the value of residential
or commercial real estate could have a material adverse effect on the value of property used as
collateral for our loans.
Adverse changes in the economy may have a negative effect on the ability of our borrowers to make
timely loan payments, which could have a negative impact on our earnings.
(6) Retirement and Postretirement Benefit Plans
The Company adopted SFAS No. 158 effective December 31, 2006, which required the over-funded or
under-funded status of its defined benefit pension and postretirement benefit plans to be
recognized as an asset or liability in the consolidated statements of financial condition. Future
changes in the funded status of the defined benefit and postretirement plans will be recognized in
the year in which the changes occur on a net of tax basis through accumulated other comprehensive
income or loss.
Defined Benefit Pension Plan
The Company participates in The New York State Bankers Retirement System, which is a defined
benefit pension plan covering substantially all employees. The benefits are based on years of
service and the employees highest average compensation during five consecutive years of
employment. The defined benefit plan was closed to new participants effective December 31, 2006.
Only employees hired on or before December 31, 2006 and who met the participation requirements on
or before January 1, 2008 are eligible to receive benefits.
Net periodic pension cost consists of the following components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
364 |
|
|
$ |
375 |
|
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation |
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
368 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(523 |
) |
|
|
(477 |
) |
Amortization of unrecognized loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
Amortization of unrecognized prior service cost |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension cost |
|
$ |
234 |
|
|
$ |
277 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
The Companys funding policy is to contribute, at a minimum, an actuarially determined amount that
will satisfy the minimum funding requirements determined under the appropriate sections of Internal
Revenue Code. The minimum required contribution is zero for the year ended December 31, 2008,
however the Company is considering making a discretionary contribution to the pension plan during
2008.
Postretirement Benefit Plan
Prior to December 31, 2001, an entity acquired by the Company provided health and dental care
benefits to retired employees who met specified age and service requirements through a
postretirement health and dental care plan in which both the acquired entity and the retiree shared
the cost. The plans eligibility requirements were amended in 2001 to curtail eligible benefit
payments to only retired employees and active participants who were fully vested under the Plan.
(7) Commitments and Contingencies
In the normal course of business there are outstanding commitments to extend credit not reflected
in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. These commitments generally have fixed
expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. The Company uses
the same credit policy to make such commitments as it uses for on-balance-sheet items. Unused
lines of credit and loan commitments totaling $299.8 million and $273.4 million were contractually
available as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, and are not reflected in the
consolidated statements of financial condition (unaudited). Since commitments to extend credit and
unused lines of credit may expire without being fully drawn upon, the amount does not necessarily
represent future cash commitments.
The Company guarantees the obligations or performance of customers by issuing stand-by letters of
credit to third parties. The risk involved in issuing stand-by letters of credit is essentially
the same as the credit risk involved in extending loan facilities to customers, and they are
subject to the same credit origination, portfolio maintenance and management procedures in effect
to monitor other credit and off-balance-sheet products. Typically, these instruments have terms of
five years or less and expire unused; therefore, the amount does not necessarily represent future
cash requirements. Stand-by letters of credit totaled $6.7 million and $7.3 million as of March
31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. As of March 31, 2008, the fair value of the stand-by
letters of credit was not material to the Companys consolidated financial statements.
From time to time the Company is a party to or otherwise involved in legal proceedings arising in
the normal course of business. Management does not believe that there is any pending or threatened
proceeding against the Company, which, if determined adversely, would have a material adverse
effect on the Companys business, results of operations or financial condition.
(8) Supervision and Regulation
The supervision and regulation of financial and bank holding companies and their subsidiaries is
intended primarily for the protection of depositors, the deposit insurance funds regulated by the
FDIC and the banking system as a whole, and not for the protection of shareholders or creditors of
bank holding companies. The various bank regulatory agencies have broad enforcement power over
bank holding companies and banks, including the power to impose substantial fines, operational
restrictions and other penalties for violations of laws and regulations. In addition, payments of
dividends by FSB to FII are limited or restricted in certain circumstances under banking
regulations.
The Company is also subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal
banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory, and
possibly additional discretionary, actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct
material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
For evaluating regulatory capital adequacy, companies are required to determine capital and assets
under regulatory accounting practices. Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure
capital adequacy require the Company to maintain minimum amounts and ratios. The leverage ratio
requirement is based on period-end capital to average adjusted total assets during the previous
three months. Compliance with risk-based capital requirements is determined by dividing regulatory
capital by the sum of a companys weighted asset values. Risk weightings are established by the
regulators for each asset category according to the perceived degree of risk. As of March 31,
12
2008 and December 31, 2007, the Company and FSB met all capital adequacy requirements to which they
are subject.
(9) Stock Compensation Plans
The Company has a Management Stock Incentive Plan and a Directors Stock Incentive Plan (the
Plans). Under the Plans, the Company may grant stock options to purchase shares of common stock,
shares of restricted stock or stock appreciation rights to its directors and key employees. Grants
under the Plans may be made up to 10% of the number of shares of common stock issued, including
treasury shares. The exercise price of each option equals the market price of the Companys stock
on the date of the grant. The maximum term of each option is ten years and the vesting period
generally ranges between three and five years.
The Company awarded grants of 51,500 restricted shares to eleven key officers during the three
months ended March 31, 2008. The market price of the restricted shares on the date of grant was
$19.22. Both a performance requirement and a service requirement must be satisfied before the
participant becomes vested in the shares. The performance period for the awards is the Companys
fiscal year ending on December 31, 2008.
There were no stock options granted during the three months ended March 31, 2008.
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment, requiring
the Company to recognize expense related to the fair value of the stock-based compensation awards.
The following table presents the expense associated with the amortization of unvested stock
compensation included in the consolidated statements of income (unaudited) for the periods
indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management Stock Incentive Plan (1) |
|
$ |
99 |
|
|
$ |
93 |
|
Director Stock Incentive Plan (2) |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amortization of unvested stock options |
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock awards: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management Stock Incentive Plan (1) |
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amortization of unvested restricted stock awards |
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amortization of unvested restricted stock compensation |
|
$ |
325 |
|
|
$ |
138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Included in salaries and employee benefits in the consolidated statements of income
(unaudited). |
|
(2) |
|
Included in other noninterest expense in the consolidated statements of income (unaudited). |
(10) Income Taxes
The Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes (FIN 48) effective January 1, 2007. There was no cumulative effect adjustment
related to the adoption of FIN 48. As of December 31, 2007, the Companys unrecognized tax
benefits totaled $50,000, of which $32,000 would impact the Companys effective tax rate, if
recognized or reversed. The unrecognized tax benefit was associated with a New York State (NYS)
examination of the Companys 2002 through 2005 tax years that remained in process as of December
31, 2007. During February 2008, the NYS examination was concluded and the taxes and related
accrued interest were paid consistent with the amounts accrued as discussed above. As of March 31,
2008, there is no unrecognized tax benefit or corresponding accrued interest and penalties.
The tax years that remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
|
2006 2007 |
|
New York |
|
|
2006 2007 |
|
13
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, especially in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operation, contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In general, the use of such words as estimate,
project, believe, intend, anticipate, plan, seek, expect and similar expressions are intended to
identify forward-looking statements and may include:
|
|
Statements regarding our business plans, and prospects; |
|
|
|
Statements of our goals, intentions and expectations; |
|
|
|
Statements regarding our growth and operating strategies; |
|
|
|
Statements regarding the quality of our loan and investment portfolios; and |
|
|
|
Estimates of our risks and future costs and benefits. |
The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbor for forward-looking
statements. In order to comply with the terms of the safe harbor, the Company notes that a variety
of factors could cause the Companys actual results and experience to differ materially from the
anticipated results or other expectations expressed in the Companys forward-looking statements.
Some of the risks and uncertainties that may affect the operations, performance, development and
results of the Companys business, the interest rate sensitivity of its assets and liabilities, and
the adequacy of its allowance for loan losses, include but are not limited to those described in
Item 1A of the Companys 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K and the following:
|
|
Significantly increased competition between depository and other financial institutions; |
|
|
|
Changes in the interest rate environment or yield curve that reduces our margins or the
fair value of financial instruments; |
|
|
|
General economic conditions, either nationally or in our market areas, that are worse than
expected; |
|
|
|
Declines in the value of real estate, equipment, livestock and other assets serving as
collateral for our loans outstanding, which could affect our allowance for loan losses; |
|
|
|
Legislative or regulatory changes that adversely affect our business; |
|
|
|
Changes in consumer spending, borrowing and savings habits; |
|
|
|
Changes in accounting policies and practices, as generally accepted in the United States of
America; and |
|
|
|
Actions taken by regulators with jurisdiction over the Company or its subsidiaries. |
The Company cautions readers not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which
speak only as of the date made, and advises readers that various factors, including those described
above, could affect the Companys financial performance and could cause the Companys actual
results or circumstances for future periods to differ materially from those anticipated or
projected.
Except as required by law, the Company does not undertake, and specifically disclaims any
obligation, to publicly release any revisions to any forward-looking statements to reflect the
occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events or circumstances after the date of such
statements.
GENERAL
The principal objective of this discussion is to provide an overview of the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company for the periods covered in this quarterly report. This
discussion and tabular presentations should be read in conjunction with the accompanying
consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes.
The Companys revenues are dependent primarily on net interest income, which is the difference
between the income earned on loans and securities and the interest paid on deposits and borrowings.
Revenues are also affected by service charges on deposits, ATM and debit card income,
broker-dealer fees and commissions, loan servicing income, corporate owned life insurance, gain or
loss on the sale or call of securities, gain or loss on sale of loans held for sale, gain or loss
on the sale of other assets and other miscellaneous noninterest income.
The Companys expenses primarily consist of the provision for loan losses, salaries and employee
benefits, occupancy and equipment, supplies and postage, amortization of other intangible assets,
computer and data processing, professional fees and services, advertising and promotions, other
miscellaneous noninterest expense and income tax expense.
14
Results of operations are also affected by the general economic and competitive conditions,
particularly changes in interest rates, government policies and the actions of regulatory
authorities.
OVERVIEW
Net income for the first quarter of 2008 was $3.8 million, or $0.31 per diluted share, compared
with $3.6 million, or $0.29 per diluted share, for the first quarter of 2007. The increase in net
income was primarily the result of an increase in net interest income, which was $15.1 million for
the first quarter of 2008, up $1.1 million from $14.0 million in the first quarter of 2007. Net
interest margin increased 34 basis points, to 3.73%, for the first quarter of 2008 compared with
3.39% for the same period last year. The improved net interest margin resulted principally from
lower funding costs, an improved yield from investment securities and the benefits associated with
a higher percentage of earning assets being deployed in higher yielding loan assets.
The increase in net interest income was partially offset by increases in the provision for loan
losses and noninterest expense. The Companys provision for loan losses for the first quarter of
2008 was $716 thousand, compared to no provision for loan losses in the first quarter of 2007.
Noninterest expense increased $345 thousand, or 2%, in the first quarter of 2008 to $14.3 million
compared with $13.9 million for the first quarter of 2007. The principal expense items that
contributed to the increase were: salaries and benefits increased $82 thousand primarily due to
stock compensation related expenses, occupancy and equipment costs, which increased $132 thousand
due to higher service contract costs on buildings, equipment and software, and computer and data
processing expenses, which increased $124 thousand.
The Company experienced an increase of $8.2 million in loans to $972.4 million as of March 31, 2008
compared to $964.2 million as of December 31, 2007. The increase reflects execution of the
Companys business plan to rebuild its loan portfolio in a disciplined manner.
Nonperforming assets decreased $886 thousand from December
31, 2007 to $8.6 million at March 31, 2008. Since March 31, 2007, nonperforming assets have
declined $8.4 million, or 49%. Net loan charge-offs of $688 thousand for the first quarter
represented 29 basis points of average loans (annualized). Net charge-offs of $134 thousand for
the first quarter of 2007 represented 6 basis points of average loans (annualized). The increase
in net charge-offs in 2008 principally resulted from higher commercial mortgage and indirect loan
charge-offs. The allowance for loan losses was $15.5 million as of March 31, 2008 and December 31,
2007. Nonperforming loans were $7.4 million at March 31, 2008, compared with $8.1 million at
December 31, 2007. The ratio of allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans improved to 211%
at March 31, 2008 versus 192% at December 31, 2007 and 107% at March 31, 2007.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The Companys consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America and are consistent with predominant
practices in the financial services industry. Application of critical accounting policies, which
are those policies that management believes are the most important to the Companys financial
position and results, requires management to make estimates, assumptions, and judgments that affect
the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes and are based
on information available as of the date of the financial statements. Future changes in information
may affect these estimates, assumptions and judgments, which, in turn, may affect amounts reported
in the financial statements.
The Company has numerous accounting policies, of which the most significant are presented in Note 1
of the notes to consolidated financial statements included in the Companys Annual Report on Form
10-K as of December 31, 2007, dated March 11, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. These policies, along with the disclosures presented in the other financial statement
notes and in this discussion, provide information on how significant assets, liabilities, revenues
and expenses are reported in the consolidated financial statements and how those reported amounts
are determined. Based on the sensitivity of financial statement amounts to the methods,
assumptions, and estimates underlying those amounts, management has determined that the accounting
policies with respect to the allowance for loan losses, goodwill and defined benefit pension plan
require particularly subjective or complex judgments important to the Companys consolidated
financial statements, results of operations, and, as such, are considered to be critical accounting
policies as discussed below.
Allowance for Loan Losses: The allowance for loan losses represents managements estimate
of probable credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio. Determining the amount of the allowance
for loan losses is considered a critical accounting estimate because it requires significant
judgment and the use of subjective measurements including
15
managements assessment of the internal risk classifications of loans, changes in the nature of the
loan portfolio, industry concentrations and the impact of current local, regional and national
economic factors on the quality of the loan portfolio. Changes in these estimates and assumptions
are reasonably possible and may have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial
statements, results of operations or liquidity.
A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that a
creditor will be unable to collect all amounts of principal and interest under the original terms
of the agreement or the loan is restructured in a troubled debt restructuring. Accordingly, the
Company evaluates impaired commercial and agricultural loans individually based on the present
value of future cash flows discounted at the loans effective interest rate, or at the loans
observable market price or the net realizable value of the collateral if the loan is collateral
dependent. The majority of the Companys impaired loans are collateral dependent.
Loans, including impaired loans, are generally classified as nonaccruing if they are past due as to
maturity or payment of principal or interest for a period of more than 90 days, unless such loans
are well-collateralized and in the process of collection. Loans that are on a current payment
status or past due less than 90 days may also be classified as nonaccruing if repayment in full of
principal and/or interest is uncertain.
For additional discussion related to the Companys accounting policies for the allowance for loan
losses, see the section titled Analysis of the Allowance for Loan Losses.
Goodwill: Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142, Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets prescribes the accounting for goodwill and intangible assets subsequent to
initial recognition. The provisions of SFAS No. 142 discontinue the amortization of goodwill and
intangible assets with indefinite lives. Instead, these assets are subject to at least an annual
impairment review, and more frequently if certain impairment indicators are in evidence. Changes
in the estimates and assumptions are reasonably possible and may have a material impact on the
Companys consolidated financial statements, results of operations or liquidity. During the fourth
quarter of 2007, the Company evaluated goodwill for impairment using a discounted cash flow
analysis and determined no impairment existed. There were no material events or transactions that
occurred subsequent to that evaluation that indicates any impairment as of the current period end.
Defined Benefit Pension Plan: Management is required to make various assumptions in
valuing its defined benefit pension plan assets and liabilities. These assumptions include, but are
not limited to, the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets, the weighted average discount
rate used to value certain liabilities and the rate of compensation increase. The Company uses a
third-party specialist to assist in making these estimates and assumptions. Changes in these
estimates and assumptions are reasonably possible and may have a material impact on the Companys
consolidated financial statements, results of operations or liquidity.
16
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following tables present certain information and ratios that management of the Company
considers important in evaluating performance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or For the Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Per common share data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income basic |
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
Net income diluted |
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
Cash dividends declared |
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
Book value |
|
$ |
16.36 |
|
|
$ |
14.81 |
|
Tangible book value |
|
$ |
12.91 |
|
|
$ |
11.42 |
|
Common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares basic |
|
|
10,938,275 |
|
|
|
11,316,811 |
|
Weighted average shares diluted |
|
|
10,974,674 |
|
|
|
11,360,202 |
|
Period end |
|
|
10,992,449 |
|
|
|
11,271,676 |
|
Performance ratios (annualized) and data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average assets |
|
|
0.80 |
% |
|
|
0.77 |
% |
Return on average common equity |
|
|
7.61 |
% |
|
|
7.96 |
% |
Return on average tangible common equity |
|
|
9.65 |
% |
|
|
10.35 |
% |
Common dividend payout ratio |
|
|
45.16 |
% |
|
|
34.48 |
% |
Net interest margin (tax-equivalent) |
|
|
3.73 |
% |
|
|
3.39 |
% |
Efficiency ratio (1) |
|
|
67.63 |
% |
|
|
69.40 |
% |
Full-time equivalent employees |
|
|
620 |
|
|
|
634 |
|
Asset quality data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans past due 90 days or more |
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
Nonaccruing loans |
|
|
7,353 |
|
|
|
15,778 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming loans |
|
|
7,355 |
|
|
|
15,785 |
|
Other real estate owned (ORE) and repossessed assets (repos) |
|
|
1,257 |
|
|
|
1,216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming assets |
|
$ |
8,612 |
|
|
$ |
17,001 |
|
Gross loan charge-offs |
|
$ |
1,458 |
|
|
$ |
692 |
|
Net loan charge-offs |
|
$ |
688 |
|
|
$ |
134 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
$ |
15,549 |
|
|
$ |
16,914 |
|
Asset quality ratios: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonperforming loans to total loans |
|
|
0.76 |
% |
|
|
1.70 |
% |
Nonperforming assets to total loans, ORE and repos |
|
|
0.88 |
% |
|
|
1.83 |
% |
Nonperforming assets to total assets |
|
|
0.45 |
% |
|
|
0.87 |
% |
Allowance for loan losses to total loans |
|
|
1.60 |
% |
|
|
1.82 |
% |
Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans |
|
|
211 |
% |
|
|
107 |
% |
Net loan charge-offs to average loans (annualized) |
|
|
0.29 |
% |
|
|
0.06 |
% |
Capital ratios: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-end common equity to total assets |
|
|
9.40 |
% |
|
|
8.50 |
% |
Period-end tangible common equity to total tangible assets |
|
|
7.57 |
% |
|
|
6.69 |
% |
Leverage ratio |
|
|
9.38 |
% |
|
|
8.99 |
% |
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio |
|
|
15.34 |
% |
|
|
15.58 |
% |
Total risk-based capital ratio |
|
|
16.59 |
% |
|
|
16.83 |
% |
|
|
(1)
The efficiency ratio represents noninterest expense less other real estate expense and amortization of intangibles
divided by net interest income (tax-equivalent) plus other noninterest income less net gain on sale or call of
securities, and net gain on sale of trust relationships: |
|
Noninterest expense |
|
$ |
14,273 |
|
|
$ |
13,928 |
|
Less: Other real estate expense |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
Amortization of other intangible assets |
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net expense (numerator) |
|
$ |
14,157 |
|
|
$ |
13,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
15,085 |
|
|
$ |
13,956 |
|
Plus: Tax-equivalent adjustment |
|
|
1,276 |
|
|
|
1,149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (tax-equivalent) |
|
|
16,361 |
|
|
|
15,105 |
|
Plus: Noninterest income |
|
|
4,744 |
|
|
|
4,738 |
|
Less: Net gain on sale or call of securities |
|
|
(173 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Less: Net gain on sale of trust relationships |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue (denominator) |
|
$ |
20,932 |
|
|
$ |
19,830 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
NET INCOME ANALYSIS
Average Balance Sheets
The following tables present, for the periods indicated, information regarding: (i) the average
balance sheet; (ii) the amount of interest income from interest-earning assets and the resulting
annualized yields (tax-exempt yields and tax-preferred yields on securities that qualify for the
Federal dividend received deduction (DRD) have been adjusted to a tax-equivalent basis using the
applicable Federal tax rate in each year); (iii) the amount of interest expense on interest-bearing
liabilities and the resulting annualized rates; (iv) net interest income; (v) net interest rate
spread; (vi) net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets (net interest
margin); and (vii) the ratio of average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing
liabilities. Average balances are calculated using daily balances. Investment securities are at
amortized cost for both held to maturity and available for sale securities. Loans include net
unearned income, net deferred loan fees and costs and nonaccruing loans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized |
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Interest Earned/ |
|
|
Yield/ |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Interest Earned/ |
|
|
Yield/ |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Balance |
|
|
Paid |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Paid |
|
|
Rate |
|
Interest-earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits |
|
$ |
40,807 |
|
|
$ |
310 |
|
|
|
3.06 |
% |
|
$ |
57,405 |
|
|
$ |
752 |
|
|
|
5.32 |
% |
Investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable |
|
|
492,312 |
|
|
|
5,582 |
|
|
|
4.54 |
% |
|
|
561,927 |
|
|
|
6,168 |
|
|
|
4.39 |
% |
Tax-exempt |
|
|
228,319 |
|
|
|
3,129 |
|
|
|
5.48 |
% |
|
|
239,855 |
|
|
|
3,277 |
|
|
|
5.46 |
% |
Tax-preferred |
|
|
33,192 |
|
|
|
799 |
|
|
|
9.63 |
% |
|
|
8,212 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
6.37 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities |
|
|
753,823 |
|
|
|
9,510 |
|
|
|
5.05 |
% |
|
|
809,994 |
|
|
|
9,576 |
|
|
|
4.73 |
% |
Loans held for sale |
|
|
587 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
6.42 |
% |
|
|
545 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
6.21 |
% |
Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and agricultural |
|
|
430,945 |
|
|
|
7,683 |
|
|
|
7.17 |
% |
|
|
408,752 |
|
|
|
7,785 |
|
|
|
7.72 |
% |
Residential real estate |
|
|
166,682 |
|
|
|
2,668 |
|
|
|
6.40 |
% |
|
|
163,046 |
|
|
|
2,643 |
|
|
|
6.48 |
% |
Consumer indirect |
|
|
137,756 |
|
|
|
2,389 |
|
|
|
6.98 |
% |
|
|
106,249 |
|
|
|
1,755 |
|
|
|
6.70 |
% |
Consumer direct and home equity |
|
|
229,035 |
|
|
|
3,979 |
|
|
|
6.99 |
% |
|
|
243,435 |
|
|
|
4,436 |
|
|
|
7.39 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
|
964,418 |
|
|
|
16,719 |
|
|
|
6.97 |
% |
|
|
921,482 |
|
|
|
16,619 |
|
|
|
7.30 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets |
|
|
1,759,635 |
|
|
$ |
26,548 |
|
|
|
6.05 |
% |
|
|
1,789,426 |
|
|
$ |
26,955 |
|
|
|
6.07 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loans losses |
|
|
(15,530 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,159 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other noninterest-earning assets |
|
|
146,769 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
142,326 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,890,874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,914,593 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings and money market |
|
$ |
361,425 |
|
|
$ |
1,324 |
|
|
|
1.47 |
% |
|
$ |
334,455 |
|
|
$ |
1,370 |
|
|
|
1.66 |
% |
Interest-bearing demand |
|
|
345,102 |
|
|
|
1,117 |
|
|
|
1.30 |
% |
|
|
355,785 |
|
|
|
1,593 |
|
|
|
1.82 |
% |
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
633,599 |
|
|
|
6,795 |
|
|
|
4.31 |
% |
|
|
683,361 |
|
|
|
7,800 |
|
|
|
4.63 |
% |
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
26,814 |
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
2.28 |
% |
|
|
29,052 |
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
2.36 |
% |
Long-term borrowings |
|
|
25,819 |
|
|
|
367 |
|
|
|
5.72 |
% |
|
|
38,177 |
|
|
|
486 |
|
|
|
5.17 |
% |
Junior subordinated debentures |
|
|
16,702 |
|
|
|
432 |
|
|
|
10.35 |
% |
|
|
16,702 |
|
|
|
432 |
|
|
|
10.35 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
1,409,461 |
|
|
|
10,187 |
|
|
|
2.91 |
% |
|
|
1,457,532 |
|
|
|
11,850 |
|
|
|
3.30 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits |
|
|
267,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
254,274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other noninterest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
16,517 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,834 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,693,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,731,640 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
197,574 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
182,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
1,890,874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,914,593 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income tax-equivalent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,105 |
|
|
|
|
|
Less: tax-exempt TE adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,064 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,114 |
|
|
|
|
|
Less: tax-preferred TE adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
15,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
13,956 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest rate spread |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.14 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.77 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earning assets |
|
$ |
350,174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
331,894 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income as a percentage of average
interest-earning assets (net interest margin) TE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.73 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.39 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of average interest-earning assets to average
interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124.84 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122.77 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
Net Interest Income
For the three months ended March 31, 2008, net interest income was $15.1 million, up $1.1 million
in comparison with $14.0 million for the same period last year. For the first quarter of 2008,
average interest-earning assets totaled $1.760 billion, down $29.8 million from the same quarter a
year ago. This decrease resulted principally from a decrease in average total investment assets,
including Federal funds sold, of $72.8, partially offset by a $43.0 million increase in average
total loans. The overall decline in average interest-earning assets was more than offset by a
reduction in average interest-bearing liabilities of $48.1 million. Net interest margin was 3.73%
for the three months ended March 31, 2008, a 34 basis point increase from 3.39% for the same period
last year. The yield on interest-earning assets decreased by 2 basis points to 6.05%, for the
quarter ended March 31, 2008, compared to 6.07% for the same quarter a year ago. The Companys
cost of funds decreased 36 basis points, to 2.32%, for the first quarter of 2008, versus the same
quarter last year, primarily related to a reduction in market interest rates that has occurred over
the past several months.
Rate/Volume Analysis
The following table presents the extent to which changes in interest rates and changes in the
volume of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities have affected the Companys
interest income and interest expense during the periods indicated. Information is provided in each
category with respect to: (i) changes attributable to changes in volume (changes in volume
multiplied by current year rate); (ii) changes attributable to changes in rate (changes in rate
multiplied by prior volume); and (iii) the net change. The changes attributable to the combined
impact of volume and rate have been allocated proportionately to the changes due to volume and the
changes due to rate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 vs. 2007 |
|
|
|
Increase/(Decrease) |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Due To |
|
|
Increase/ |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Volume |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds sold and
interest-bearing deposits |
|
$ |
(122 |
) |
|
$ |
(320 |
) |
|
$ |
(442 |
) |
Investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable |
|
|
(799 |
) |
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
(586 |
) |
Tax-exempt |
|
|
(160 |
) |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
(148 |
) |
Tax-preferred |
|
|
601 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
668 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities |
|
|
(358 |
) |
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held for sale |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and agricultural |
|
|
452 |
|
|
|
(554 |
) |
|
|
(102 |
) |
Residential real estate |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
25 |
|
Consumer indirect |
|
|
560 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
634 |
|
Consumer direct and home equity |
|
|
(215 |
) |
|
|
(242 |
) |
|
|
(457 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
|
855 |
|
|
|
(755 |
) |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets |
|
|
376 |
|
|
|
(783 |
) |
|
|
(407 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings and money market |
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
(148 |
) |
|
|
(46 |
) |
Interest-bearing demand |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
(451 |
) |
|
|
(476 |
) |
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
(468 |
) |
|
|
(537 |
) |
|
|
(1,005 |
) |
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
Long-term borrowings |
|
|
(171 |
) |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
(119 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
(573 |
) |
|
|
(1,090 |
) |
|
|
(1,663 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income TE |
|
$ |
949 |
|
|
$ |
307 |
|
|
$ |
1,256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
Provision for Loan Losses
The provision for loan losses represents managements estimate of the adjustment necessary to
maintain the allowance for loan losses at a level representative of probable credit losses inherent
in the portfolio. There was a provision for loan losses of $716 thousand for the first quarter of
2008, compared with a provision for loan losses of zero for the first quarter of 2007. The
increase in the provision for loan losses corresponds, and is primarily due, to the increase in net
loan charge-offs, which totaled $688 thousand in the first quarter of 2008, compared to $134
thousand for the prior years first quarter. Net loan charge-offs to average loans (annualized)
for the first quarter 2008 was 0.29% compared with 0.06% in the same quarter last year. The
increase in net charge-offs in 2008 principally resulted from higher commercial mortgage and
indirect loan charge-offs. Also impacting the provision for loan losses in the first quarter of
2008 were considerations of general economic conditions in the Companys market area, as well as,
growth in the commercial and indirect loan portfolios.
Noninterest Income
The following table details the major categories of noninterest income for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Noninterest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges on deposits |
|
$ |
2,500 |
|
|
$ |
2,569 |
|
ATM and debit card income |
|
|
752 |
|
|
|
620 |
|
Broker-dealer fees and commissions |
|
|
459 |
|
|
|
383 |
|
Loan servicing |
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
205 |
|
Corporate owned life insurance |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
Net gain on sale or call of securities |
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain on sale of loans held for sale |
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
Net gain on sale of other assets |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
Net gain on sale of trust relationships |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
Other |
|
|
454 |
|
|
|
710 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest income |
|
$ |
4,744 |
|
|
$ |
4,738 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest income for the first quarter of 2008 was $4.7 million, basically flat in comparison to
the same quarter a year ago. The components of noninterest income fluctuated as discussed below.
Service charges on deposits were down 3% in the first quarter of 2008 versus the first quarter a
year ago. The decline is primarily due to a decrease in the level of commercial service charges
and non-sufficient funds fees.
Automated Teller Machine (ATM) and debit card income, which represents fees for foreign ATM usage
and income associated with customer debit card purchases, totaled $752 thousand and $620 thousand
for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. ATM and debit card income has
increased due to higher transaction volumes.
Broker-dealer fees and commissions increased $76 thousand in the first quarter of 2008 compared to
the same quarter a year ago, due in part to higher sales volumes.
Loan servicing income represents fees earned for servicing mortgage loans sold to third parties,
net of amortization expense and impairment losses, if any, associated with capitalized mortgage
servicing assets. Loan servicing income declined in the first quarter of 2008 compared to the same
quarter a year ago, partly the result of a decrease in the sold and serviced residential real
estate portfolio.
Net gain on sale or call of securities increased to $173 thousand in the first quarter of 2008 as
several callable bonds, originally purchased at a discount, were called during the first three
months of the year due to the decline in interest rates since the bonds were issued.
Other noninterest income decreased to $454 thousand in the first quarter of 2008 compared to $710
thousand for the first quarter of 2007, principally from lower income from Small Business
Investment Company limited partnership investments accounted for under the equity method.
20
Noninterest Expense
The following table details the major categories of noninterest expense for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits |
|
$ |
8,436 |
|
|
$ |
8,354 |
|
Occupancy and equipment |
|
|
2,580 |
|
|
|
2,448 |
|
Supplies and postage |
|
|
441 |
|
|
|
438 |
|
Amortization of other intangible assets |
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
Computer and data processing |
|
|
581 |
|
|
|
457 |
|
Professional fees and services |
|
|
557 |
|
|
|
495 |
|
Advertising and promotions |
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
220 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,451 |
|
|
|
1,439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense |
|
$ |
14,273 |
|
|
$ |
13,928 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest expense for the first quarter of 2008 increased $345 thousand, or 2% to $14.3 million
from $13.9 million for the first quarter of 2007. The increase relates mostly to salaries and
employee benefits, occupancy and equipment, computer and data processing, and professional fees and
services.
For the first quarter of 2008, salaries and benefits increased $82 thousand from the first quarter
of 2007. This increase resulted from an increase in management stock compensation expense, which
totaled $318 thousand for the first quarter of 2008 versus $117 thousand for the first quarter of
2007, as the Company awarded grants of 51,500 restricted shares to eleven key officers during the
three months ended March 31, 2008. This increase in stock compensation expense was offset by a
decrease in pension, medical and unemployment employee benefits. The Company reduced the number of
full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) by 2% to 620 as of March 31, 2008, down from 634 as of
March 31, 2007.
The Company experienced a 5% increase in occupancy and equipment expense in the first quarter of
2008 compared to the same quarter a year ago, primarily the result of increases in service contract
expenses. The Company has actively managed to reduce costs and lower overhead, but those efforts
were more than offset by rising service contract expenses related to buildings, equipment and
computer software.
Supplies and postage were relatively unchanged when comparing the three months ended March 31, 2008
and 2007.
Computer and data processing costs increased $124 thousand, or 27%, to $581 thousand for the three
months ended March 31, 2008 compared to the same quarter last year. The increase is due to higher
data processing related expenses associated with the increasing trend towards electronic banking
and transaction processing.
Professional fees have increased 13% for the three-month period ended March 31, 2008 as compared to
the same period a year ago, primarily a result of an increase in legal expenses.
Advertising and promotions have decreased $70 thousand, or 32%, to $150 thousand for the three
months ended March 31, 2008 compared to the same quarter last year. The decrease relates largely
to a reduction in cost and timing of the spring consumer loan campaign in the first quarter of 2008
versus the same quarter last year.
Other expenses have remained consistent with the first quarter in the prior year increasing 1% for
the three-month periods ended March 31, 2008 versus March 31, 2007.
The efficiency ratio was 67.63% and 69.40% for the first quarter of 2008 and 2007, respectively.
The 2008 efficiency ratio, compared to 2007, reflects the increase in net interest income partially
offset by the higher level of noninterest expense. The efficiency ratio represents noninterest
expense less other real estate expense and amortization of intangibles divided by net interest
income (tax-equivalent) plus other noninterest income less net gain on sale or call of securities
and net gain on sale of trust relationships.
21
Income Taxes
The income tax provision provides for Federal and New York State income taxes and amounted to $1.1
million for each of the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007. The effective tax rates for
the first quarter of 2008 and 2007 were 21.9% and 24.2%, respectively. The reduction in the
effective tax rate resulted primarily from a significant increase in tax-preferred dividend income
qualifying for the Federal DRD, coupled with reductions in interest expense (i.e. lower Federal
nondeductible interest expense) and the New York State statutory tax rate.
ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
Investing Activities
The Companys investment security portfolio totaled $746.1 million as of March 31, 2008 compared to
$754.7 million as of December 31, 2007. Further detail regarding the Companys investment
portfolio follows.
The deteriorating credit quality of assets linked to the sub-prime mortgage market, caused by a
decline in general mortgage credit standards, has led to a lack of liquidity and downgrades to
certain mortgage-backed and other securities in the financial marketplace. This, in turn, has
contributed to a broad-based liquidity shortfall in the financial system. The subsequent increase
in risk aversion has contributed to a decline in credit availability in the financial and capital
markets. Further deterioration in credit quality, with a continuation of the current imbalances in
liquidity that exist in the marketplace, will increase the potential that the impairment that
exists on some of our asset holdings might be determined to be other-than-temporary and the Company
would incur associated write-downs. Certain of our privately issued whole loan collateralized
mortgage obligations, pooled trust preferred securities and auction rate preferred equity
securities are most affected by these issues and are most at risk for potential impairment
write-downs.
U.S. Government Agency and U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprise (GSE) Obligations
The U.S. government agency and GSE obligations portfolio, all of which was classified as available
for sale, was comprised of debt obligations issued directly by the U.S. government agencies or GSEs
and totaled $133.2 million as of March 31, 2008. The portfolio consisted of approximately $73.2
million, or 55%, callable securities as of March 31, 2008. As of March 31, 2008, this category of
securities also included $34.5 million of structured notes, the majority of which were
step-callable debt issues that step-up in rate at specified intervals and are periodically callable
by the issuer. As of March 31, 2008, the structured notes had a current average coupon rate of
4.29% that adjust on average to 6.27% within three years. However, under current market conditions
these notes are likely to be called. As of December 31, 2007, the available for sale U.S.
government agency and GSE obligations portfolio totaled $158.9 million.
Mortgage-Backed Securities (MBS)
The MBS portfolio, all of which was classified as available for sale, totaled $315.6 million as of
March 31, 2008, which was comprised of $181.0 million of mortgage-backed pass-through securities
(pass-through) and $134.6 million of collateralized mortgage obligations (CMO). As of December
31, 2007, the MBS portfolio totaled $295.9 million, which consisted of $160.0 million of
pass-throughs and $135.9 million of CMOs.
The pass-throughs were predominately issued by FNMA, FHLMC or GNMA. The majority of the
pass-through portfolio was in fixed rate securities that were most frequently formed with mortgages
having an original balloon payment of five or seven years and 15, 20 and 30 year seasoned
mortgages. The remainder of the pass-through portfolio was principally adjustable rate securities
indexed to the one-year Treasury bill.
The CMO portfolio consisted of two principal groups, with balances as of March 31, 2008 as follows:
(1) $78.9 million of AAA rated fixed and variable rate CMOs issued by either FNMA, FHLMC or GNMA
that carried a full guaranty by the issuing agency of both principal and interest, and (2) $55.7
million of privately issued whole loan CMOs.
22
The following table details, by risk rating, the privately issued whole loan CMOs as of March 31:
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk rating: |
|
|
|
|
AAA |
|
$ |
43.8 |
|
AAA/AA |
|
|
7.4 |
|
AA |
|
|
3.9 |
|
A-/BB |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total privately issued whole loan CMOs |
|
$ |
55.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2008, the weighted average percentage (by dollars) of the underlying mortgages that
were owner occupied in the privately issued whole loan CMO portfolio was 96%. In addition, 98% of
the total privately issued whole loan CMO portfolio was backed by underlying mortgages that were at
fixed rates.
All of the bonds rated AAA were issued prior to 2004 and are therefore at least three years
seasoned. The bonds rated AAA/AA were issued in 2005, 2006, and 2007, and therefore have mortgages
as underlying collateral with relatively short seasoning. The credit support on the AAA/AA classes
owned has increased in all cases since the deals were originated. The portfolio included a $1.0
million AAA/AA bond with underlying mortgages where 36% were classified as sub-prime (credit score
of 650 or less), 100% were at fixed rates, average seasoning was 26 months, and the credit
subordination level at March 31, 2008 was 8.57%. In addition, the portfolio included a $3.9
million AA rated bond with underlying mortgages where 45% were classified as sub-prime, 100% were
fixed rate, average seasoning was 96 months, and the credit subordination level at March 31, 2008
was 1.30%. The portfolio also included a $554 thousand A-/BB rated bond. During the first quarter
of 2008, one of the rating agencies downgraded this bond to BB. The bond has underlying mortgages
where 69% were classified as sub-prime, 100% were variable rate, average seasoning was 55 months,
the percentage of delinquencies and foreclosures was high, but the credit subordination level at
March 31, 2008 was 12.30%.
Other Asset-Backed Securities (ABS)
The ABS portfolio, all of which was classified as available for sale, totaled $31.6 million as of
March 31, 2008 and was comprised of positions in 14 different pooled trust preferred securities
issues with ratings ranging from A- to AA and one AAA rated Student Loan Marketing Association
(SLMA) floater or variable rate security backed by student loans. All of the trust preferred
securities are backed by preferred debt issued by many different financial institutions and
insurance companies. The financial services industry is experiencing conditions that have, in some
individual companies, resulted in lower earnings and strained capital positions. Some of the
financial institutions and insurance companies in the pooled trust preferred securities the Company
owns are experiencing these financial difficulties. Also, due to the imbalances in liquidity that
exist in the marketplace, the market for these securities is thin. As a result of these conditions
and others, the fair value of the Companys pooled trust preferred securities was $2.3 million
lower than amortized cost at March 31, 2008. The ABS portfolio, all of which was classified as
available for sale, totaled $33.2 million as of December 31, 2007.
State and Municipal Obligations
At March 31, 2008, the portfolio of state and municipal obligations totaled $232.3 million, of
which $174.7 million was classified as available for sale. As of that date, $57.6 million was
classified as held to maturity, with a fair value of $58.2 million. As of December 31, 2007 the
portfolio of state and municipal obligations totaled $232.1 million, of which $172.6 million was
classified as available for sale. As of that date, $59.5 million was classified as held to
maturity, with a fair value of $59.9 million.
Equity Securities
As of March 31, 2008, the Company had $33.4 million in equity securities that included $32.4
million of auction rate preferred equity securities collateralized by FNMA and FHLMC preferred
stock and $976 thousand of common equity securities. The dividend income related to both the
common and auction rate preferred equity securities qualifies for the Federal income tax dividend
received deduction.
The auction rate preferred equity securities consisted of three positions collateralized by FNMA
preferred stock totaling $13.9 million and four positions collateralized by FHLMC preferred stock
totaling $18.5 million. The auction rate preferred equity securities are all rated AA-. The
auction rate preferred equity securities were structured
23
to be tendered at par, at the option of the investor, at auctions occurring every 90 days. While
these securities all experienced successful auctions in January 2008, the most recent auctions
occurred in April 2008 and the auctions were unsuccessful, primarily the result of recent
disruptions in the financial and capital markets as opposed to a credit problem with the underlying
issuers of the preferred equity securities. Each of the auction rate preferred equity securities
contain provisions to deal with an unsuccessful auction. The rate on these securities has been
capped for the next 90 days. The Company will continue to receive dividend income at the capped
rate and the auctions will continue to take place at future pre-established dates. The next
auctions are scheduled for July 2008 and it is possible the auctions will again be unsuccessful due
to an imbalance of holders desiring to liquidate their securities and insufficient buyers willing
to purchase those securities at or below the maximum interest rate allowable under the structure.
As of December 31, 2007, the Company had $34.6 million in equity securities, that included $33.8
million of auction rate preferred equity securities collateralized by FNMA and FHLMC preferred
stock and $780 thousand of common equity securities.
Other-Than-Temporary Impairment
Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment on a quarterly basis, or as
economic or market concerns warrant such evaluation. Consideration is given to (1) the length of
time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition
and near-term prospects of the issuer, and (3) the intent and ability of the Company to retain its
investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for recovery in fair value to
their amortized cost. The gross unrealized loss on securities available for sale totaled $5.1
million and $4.3 million as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. The unrealized
losses present resulted primarily from fluctuations in market interest rates. The Company has the
intent and ability to hold these securities until their fair value recovers to their amortized
cost; therefore, management has determined that the securities that were in an unrealized loss
position as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 represent only temporary impairments.
Fair Value Accounting
Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS)
No. 157, which defines fair value, establishes a consistent framework for measuring fair value and
expands the disclosure requirements related to fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 defines fair
value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an
exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants on the measurement date.
Depending on the nature of the asset or liability, the Company uses various valuation techniques
and assumptions when estimating fair value. SFAS No. 157 requires an entity to maximize the use of
observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. See Note
4 of the notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements for disclosure of the available for
sale securities portfolio detailed in accordance with the SFAS No. 157 fair value hierarchy.
The securities valued using unobservable inputs were auction-rate preferred equity securities as
the financial and capital markets have experienced significant dislocation and illiquidity in
regard to this type of instrument. The Company obtained third-party dealer quotes for these
securities, as this level of evidence is the strongest support absent current market activity for
the fair value of these instruments.
Lending Activities
Loans Held for Sale
Loans held for sale (not included in the table below) totaled $1.1 million and $906 thousand as of
March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, all of which were residential real estate
loans.
The Company sells certain qualifying newly originated and refinanced residential real estate
mortgages to the secondary market. Residential real estate mortgages serviced for others totaled
$332.6 million and $338.1 million as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, and are
not included in the consolidated statements of financial condition. The Company retained selected
newly originated residential mortgages, resulting in a decline in the sold and serviced residential
real estate portfolio, as run-off outpaced new sold and serviced loan volumes during the three
months ended March 31, 2008.
24
Loan Portfolio Composition
The following table sets forth selected information regarding the composition of the Companys loan
portfolio as of the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
144,976 |
|
|
|
14.9 |
% |
|
$ |
136,780 |
|
|
|
14.2 |
% |
Commercial real estate |
|
|
245,148 |
|
|
|
25.2 |
|
|
|
245,797 |
|
|
|
25.5 |
|
Agricultural |
|
|
44,162 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
47,367 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
Residential real estate |
|
|
168,738 |
|
|
|
17.4 |
|
|
|
166,863 |
|
|
|
17.3 |
|
Consumer indirect |
|
|
142,565 |
|
|
|
14.7 |
|
|
|
134,977 |
|
|
|
14.0 |
|
Consumer direct and home equity |
|
|
226,855 |
|
|
|
23.3 |
|
|
|
232,389 |
|
|
|
24.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
|
972,444 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
964,173 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(15,549 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,521 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, net |
|
$ |
956,895 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
948,652 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans increased $8.2 million to $972.4 million as of March 31, 2008 from $964.2 million as of
December 31, 2007. The increase reflects execution of the Companys business plan to rebuild, in a
disciplined manner, the commercial loan portfolio and grow consumer indirect auto loans.
Commercial loans and commercial real estate loans increased $7.5 million to $390.1 million as of
March 31, 2008 from $382.6 million as of December 31, 2007, a result of the Companys focused
commercial business development programs over the past quarter.
Agricultural loans decreased $3.2 million, to $44.2 million as of March 31, 2008 from $47.4 million
as of December 31, 2007. Competition and adherence to strict credit standards has led to payments
outpacing new loan originations in the agricultural portfolio.
Residential real estate loans increased $1.8 million to $168.7 million as of March 31, 2008 in
comparison to $166.9 million as of December 31, 2007. This category of loans increased as certain
residential mortgages were added to the portfolio rather than being sold to the secondary market.
The Company does not engage in sub-prime or other high-risk residential mortgage lending as a
line-of-business.
The consumer indirect portfolio increased $7.6 million to $142.6 million as of March 31, 2008 from
$135.0 million as of December 31, 2007. The Company increased its indirect portfolio by managing
existing and developing new relationships with franchised new car dealers. During the first
quarter of 2008, the Company originated $21.5 million in indirect auto loans with a mix of
approximately 28% new auto and 72% used auto. This compares with $11.2 million in indirect loan
auto originations for the first quarter of 2007 with a mix of approximately 29% new auto and 71%
used auto.
The consumer direct and home equity portfolio decreased $5.5 million to $226.9 million as of March
31, 2008 in comparison to $232.4 million as of December 31, 2007. The decline in direct consumer
and home equity products is reflective of an overall slowing in the economy, as well as the
Companys policy to maintain a firm pricing and underwriting discipline on these products, which
has led to slower loan originations in this category.
Parts of the country have experienced a significant decline in real estate values that has led, in
some cases, to the debt on the real estate exceeding the value of the real estate. Generally, the
Western and Central New York State markets the Company serves have not experienced, to this point,
such conditions. Should deterioration in real estate values in the markets we serve occur, the
value and liquidity of real estate securing the Companys loans could become impaired. While the
Company is not engaged in the business of sub-prime lending, a decline in the value of residential
or commercial real estate could have a material adverse effect on the value of property used as
collateral for our loans.
Adverse changes in the economy may have a negative effect on the ability of our borrowers to make
timely loan payments, which could have a negative impact on our earnings.
25
Nonaccruing Loans and Nonperforming Assets
Information regarding nonaccruing loans and other nonperforming assets is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccruing loans (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
632 |
|
|
$ |
827 |
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
2,291 |
|
|
|
2,825 |
|
Agricultural |
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
481 |
|
Residential real estate |
|
|
2,945 |
|
|
|
2,987 |
|
Consumer indirect |
|
|
278 |
|
|
|
278 |
|
Consumer direct and home equity |
|
|
767 |
|
|
|
677 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonaccruing loans |
|
|
7,353 |
|
|
|
8,075 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accruing loans 90 days or more delinquent |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming loans |
|
|
7,355 |
|
|
|
8,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other real estate owned (ORE) and repossessed assets (repos) |
|
|
1,257 |
|
|
|
1,421 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming assets |
|
$ |
8,612 |
|
|
$ |
9,498 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming loans to total loans (2) |
|
|
0.76 |
% |
|
|
0.84 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming assets to total loans, ORE and repos (2) |
|
|
0.88 |
% |
|
|
0.98 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming assets to total assets |
|
|
0.45 |
% |
|
|
0.51 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Although loans are generally placed on nonaccrual status when they become 90 days or
more past due, they may be placed on nonaccrual status earlier if they have been identified
by the Company as presenting uncertainty with respect to the collectibility of interest or
principal. Loans past due 90 days or more may remain on accruing status if they are both
well secured and in the process of collection. |
|
(2) |
|
Ratios exclude loans held for sale from total loans. |
Nonperforming assets decreased $886 thousand to $8.6 million as of March 31, 2008 compared to $9.5
million as of December 31, 2007. Total nonaccruing loans decreased $722 thousand as of March 31,
2008 compared to December 31, 2007. The Company also experienced a slight decline in ORE and repos
to $1.3 million as of March 31, 2008 compared to $1.4 million as of December 31, 2007.
Information regarding the activity in nonaccruing loans is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccruing loans, beginning of period |
|
$ |
8,075 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions |
|
|
1,835 |
|
Payments |
|
|
(1,092 |
) |
Charge-offs |
|
|
(1,309 |
) |
Returned to accruing status |
|
|
(38 |
) |
Transferred to other real estate or repossessed assets |
|
|
(118 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccruing loans, end of period |
|
$ |
7,353 |
|
|
|
|
|
Potential problem loans are loans that are currently performing, but information known about
possible credit problems of the borrowers causes management to have concern as to the ability of
such borrowers to comply with the present loan payment terms and may result in disclosure of such
loans as nonperforming at some time in the future. These loans remain in a performing status due
to a variety of factors, including payment history, the value of collateral supporting the credits,
and/or personal or government guarantees. Management considers loans classified as substandard,
which continue to accrue interest, to be potential problem loans. The Company identified $18.2
million and $16.6 million in loans that continued to accrue interest which were classified as
substandard as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively.
Analysis of the Allowance for Loan Losses
The allowance for loan losses represents the estimated amount of probable credit losses inherent in
the Companys loan portfolio. The Company performs periodic, systematic reviews of the Banks loan
portfolio to estimate probable losses in the respective loan portfolios. In addition, the Company
regularly evaluates prevailing economic and business conditions, industry concentrations, changes
in the size and characteristics of the portfolio and other
26
pertinent factors. The process used by the Company to determine the overall allowance for loan
losses is based on this analysis. Based on this analysis the Company believes the allowance for
loan losses is adequate as of March 31, 2008.
Assessing the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses involves substantial uncertainties and is
based upon managements evaluation of the amounts required to meet estimated charge-offs in the
loan portfolio after weighing various factors. The adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is
subject to ongoing management review. While management evaluates currently available information
in establishing the allowance for loan losses, future adjustments to the allowance may be necessary
if conditions differ substantially from the assumptions used in making the evaluations. In
addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process,
periodically review a financial institutions allowance for loan losses and carrying amounts of
other real estate owned. Such agencies may require the financial institution to recognize
additions to the allowance based on their judgments about information available to them at the time
of their examination.
The following table sets forth an analysis of the activity in the allowance for loan losses for the
periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of beginning of period |
|
$ |
15,521 |
|
|
$ |
17,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
430 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
Agricultural |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
Consumer indirect |
|
|
569 |
|
|
|
175 |
|
Consumer direct and home equity |
|
|
338 |
|
|
|
343 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total charge-offs |
|
|
1,458 |
|
|
|
692 |
|
Recoveries: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
323 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
Agricultural |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
Residential real estate |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
Consumer indirect |
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
Consumer direct and home equity |
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recoveries |
|
|
770 |
|
|
|
558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs |
|
|
688 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
716 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of end of period |
|
$ |
15,549 |
|
|
$ |
16,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of net loan charge-offs to average
loans (annualized) |
|
|
0.29 |
% |
|
|
0.06 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of allowance for loan losses to
total loans (1) |
|
|
1.60 |
% |
|
|
1.82 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of allowance for loan losses to
nonperforming loans (1) |
|
|
211 |
% |
|
|
107 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Ratios exclude loans held for sale from total loans. |
Net loan charge-offs were $688 thousand and $134 thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2008
and 2007, respectively. The ratio of net loan charge-offs to average loans (annualized) was 0.29%
and 0.06% for the first quarter of 2008 and 2007, respectively. The Companys net charge-offs
increased in relation to the first quarter of last year, principally a result of higher commercial
mortgage and indirect loan charge-offs. The ratio of the allowance for loan losses to
nonperforming loans was 211% as of March 31, 2008 improved from 192% as of December 31, 2007 and
107% as of March 31, 2007. The ratio of the allowance for loan losses to total loans was 1.60% as
of March 31, 2008 compared to 1.61% as of December 31, 2007 and 1.82% as of March 31, 2007.
27
Funding Activities
The Company manages funding from the following principal components: deposits (nonpublic, public
and brokered), borrowings and junior subordinated debentures.
Deposits
The Bank offers a broad array of deposit products including noninterest-bearing demand,
interest-bearing demand, savings and money market accounts and certificates of deposit. As of
March 31, 2008, total deposits were $1.628 billion, an increase of $52.0 million in comparison to
$1.576 billion as of December 31, 2007.
Nonpublic deposits represent the largest component of the Companys funding. As of March 31, 2008,
total nonpublic deposits were $1.237 billion in comparison to $1.251 billion as of December 31,
2007. The decline is partly the result of seasonality associated with nonpublic deposits, as
nonpublic deposit levels tend to be lower in the first quarter of the current year when compared to
the fourth quarter of the prior year. In addition, the Company has managed this segment of funding
through a strategy of competitive pricing that minimizes the number of customer relationships that
have only a single high-cost deposit account.
The Company offers a variety of public deposit products to the many towns, villages, counties and
school districts within our market. Public deposits generally range from 20 to 25% of the
Companys total deposits. As of March 31, 2008, total public deposits were $384.6 million in
comparison to $318.1 million as of December 31, 2007. There is a high degree of seasonality in
this component of funding, as the level of deposits varies with the seasonal cash flows for these
public customers. The Company maintains the necessary levels of short-term liquid assets to
accommodate the seasonality associated with public deposits.
The Company has also utilized brokered certificates of deposit as a funding source and brokered
deposits totaled $6.8 million as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007. The Company has placed
less reliance on this higher cost wholesale funding source and intends to utilize its favorable
position of liquidity to repay the remaining brokered deposits during the second quarter of 2008 at
scheduled maturity dates.
Borrowings
The Bank has credit capacity with FHLB and can borrow through facilities that include an overnight
line-of-credit, as well as, amortizing and term advances. The Companys primary borrowing source
was FHLB advances, which amounted to $25.8 million and $28.7 million as of March 31, 2008 and
December 31, 2007, respectively. The FHLB borrowings mature on various dates through 2009 and are
classified as short-term or long-term in accordance with the original terms of the agreement. The
Company had approximately $49.1 million of immediate credit capacity with FHLB as of March 31,
2008. The FHLB credit capacity is collateralized by FHLB stock and securities from the Companys
investment portfolio. The Company also had $76.8 million of credit available under unsecured lines
of credit with various banks as of March 31, 2008. There were no advances outstanding on these
lines of credit as of March 31, 2008. The Company also utilizes securities sold under agreements
to repurchase as a source of funds. These short-term repurchase agreements amounted to $27.8
million and $22.8 million as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively.
Junior Subordinated Debentures
The Company has outstanding $16.7 million of junior subordinated debentures issued to a statutory
trust subsidiary. The junior subordinated debentures have a fixed interest rate of 10.20% and
mature 30 years from the February 2001 issuance date. The Company incurred $487,000 in costs
related to the issuance that are being amortized over 20 years using the straight-line method. The
Trust is a variable interest entity as defined by Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, and, as such, the Trust is
accounted for as an unconsolidated subsidiary.
Equity Activities
Total shareholders equity amounted to $197.4 million as of March 31, 2008, an increase of $2.1
million from $195.3 million as of December 31, 2007. The increase in shareholders equity during
the three months ended March 31, 2008 primarily resulted from $5.2 million of comprehensive income,
offset by $1.9 million in dividends declared and $1.3 million in treasury stock acquisitions under
the Companys common stock repurchase program.
28
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Liquidity
The objective of maintaining adequate liquidity is to assure the ability of the Company to meet its
financial obligations. These obligations include the withdrawal of deposits on demand or at their
contractual maturity, the repayment of borrowings as they mature, the ability to fund new and
existing loan commitments and the ability to take advantage of new business opportunities. The
Company achieves liquidity by maintaining a strong base of core customer funds, maturing short-term
assets, the ability to sell securities, lines of credit, and access to the financial and capital
markets.
Liquidity at the Bank is managed through the monitoring of anticipated changes in loans, the
investment portfolio, core deposits and wholesale funds. The strength of the Banks liquidity
position is a result of its base of core customer deposits. These core deposits are supplemented
by wholesale funding sources that include credit lines with other banking institutions, the FHLB
and the Federal Reserve Bank.
The primary sources of liquidity for FII are dividends from the Bank and access to financial and
capital markets. Dividends from the Bank are limited by various regulatory requirements related to
capital adequacy and earnings trends. The Bank relies on cash flows from operations, core
deposits, borrowings and short-term liquid assets. FSIS relies on cash flows from operations and
funds from FII when necessary.
The deteriorating credit quality of assets linked to the sub-prime mortgage market, caused by a
decline in general mortgage credit standards, has led to a lack of liquidity and downgrades to
certain mortgage-backed and other securities in the financial marketplace. This, in turn, has
contributed to a broad-based liquidity shortfall in the financial system. The subsequent increase
in risk aversion has contributed to a decline in credit availability in the financial and capital
markets. Further deterioration in credit quality, with a continuation of the current imbalances in
liquidity that exist in the marketplace, will increase the potential that the impairment that
exists on some of our asset holdings might be determined to be other-than-temporary and the Company
would incur associated write-downs. Certain of our privately issued whole loan collateralized
mortgage obligations, pooled trust preferred securities and auction rate preferred equity
securities are most affected by these issues and are most at risk for potential impairment
write-downs.
The Companys cash and cash equivalents were $103.0 million as of March 31, 2008, an increase of
$56.3 million from $46.7 million as of December 31, 2007. The Companys net cash provided by
operating activities totaled $3.6 million and the principal source of operating activity cash flow
was net income adjusted for noncash income and expense items and changes in other assets and other
liabilities. Net cash provided by investing activities totaled $1.7 million, which included net
proceeds of $10.9 million from securities transactions, offset by $9.1 million of net loan
originations. Net cash provided by financing activities of $51.0 million was primarily attributed
to the $52.0 million increase in deposits. The Companys cash and cash equivalents were $133.1
million as of March 31, 2007 an increase of $23.3 million from $109.8 million as of December 31,
2006.
Capital Resources
The Federal Reserve Board has adopted a system using risk-based capital guidelines to evaluate the
capital adequacy of bank holding companies on a consolidated basis. The leverage ratio is utilized
in assessing capital adequacy with a minimum requirement that can range from 4.0% to 5.0%. The
guidelines also require a minimum total risk-based capital ratio of 8.0%.
The Companys Tier 1 leverage ratio was 9.38% as of March 31, 2008 an increase of 3 basis points
from 9.35% as of December 31, 2007. Total Tier 1 capital of $173.6 million as of March 31, 2008
was up from $172.9 million as of December 31, 2007. Adjusted quarterly average assets of $1.851
billion for the first quarter of 2008 increased slightly in comparison to $1.849 billion for the
fourth quarter of 2007.
The Companys Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio was 15.34% as of March 31, 2008, down from 15.74% as
of December 31, 2007. The Companys total risk-weighted capital ratio was 16.59% as of March 31,
2008 compared to 16.99% as of December 31, 2007. Total risk-based capital as of March 31, 2008 was
$187.7 million, an increase of $1.0 million from December 31, 2007. Net risk-weighted assets as of
March 31, 2008 were $1.131 billion, up $32.8 million compared to $1.098 billion as of December 31,
2007.
29
The following is a summary of the risk-based capital ratios for the Company and FSB:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Tier 1 leverage ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company |
|
|
9.38 |
% |
|
|
9.35 |
% |
FSB |
|
|
8.48 |
% |
|
|
8.54 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company |
|
|
15.34 |
% |
|
|
15.74 |
% |
FSB |
|
|
13.91 |
% |
|
|
14.40 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total risk-based capital ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company |
|
|
16.59 |
% |
|
|
16.99 |
% |
FSB |
|
|
15.16 |
% |
|
|
15.65 |
% |
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The principal objective of the Companys interest rate risk management is to evaluate the interest
rate risk inherent in certain assets and liabilities, determine the appropriate level of risk to
the Company given its business strategy, operating environment, capital and liquidity requirements
and performance objectives, and manage the risk consistent with the guidelines approved by FIIs
Board of Directors. The Companys management is responsible for reviewing with the Board its
activities and strategies, the effect of those strategies on the net interest margin, the fair
value of the portfolio and the effect that changes in interest rates will have on the portfolio and
exposure limits. Management develops an Asset-Liability Policy that meets strategic objectives and
regularly reviews the activities of the Bank.
The primary tool the Company uses to manage interest rate risk is a rate shock simulation to
measure the rate sensitivity of the balance sheet. Rate shock simulation is a modeling technique
used to estimate the impact of changes in rates on net interest income and economic value of
equity. The Company measures net interest income at risk by estimating the changes in net interest
income resulting from instantaneous and sustained parallel shifts in interest rates of different
magnitudes over a period of twelve months. This simulation is based on managements assumption as
to the effect of interest rate changes on assets and liabilities and assumes a parallel shift of
the yield curve. It also includes certain assumptions about the future pricing of loans and
deposits in response to changes in interest rates. Further, it assumes that delinquency rates
would not change as a result of changes in interest rates, although there can be no assurance that
this will be the case. While this simulation is a useful measure as to net interest income at risk
due to a change in interest rates, it is not a forecast of the future results and is based on many
assumptions that, if changed, could cause a different outcome.
In addition to the changes in interest rate scenarios listed above, the Company typically runs
other scenarios to measure interest rate risk, which vary depending on the economic and interest
rate environments.
The Company has experienced no significant changes in market risk due to changes in interest rates
since the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, dated March
11, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
a) As of March 31, 2008, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the
participation of the Companys management, including the Companys Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Companys
disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b), as adopted by the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act). Based upon
that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the
Companys disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by
this report.
Disclosure controls and procedures are the controls and other procedures that are designed to
ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits
under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in the SECs rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without
limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in
the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and
30
communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as
appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
b) Changes to Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the quarter ended March 31, 2008 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
The Company has experienced no significant changes in its legal proceedings from the disclosure
included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, dated
March 11, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
The Company has experienced no significant changes in its risk factors from the disclosure included
in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, dated March 11,
2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
The table below sets forth the information with respect to purchases made by the Company (as
defined in Rule 10b-18(a)(3) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934), of our common stock during
the three months ended March 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate Dollar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
Value of Shares |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as |
|
that May Yet Be |
|
|
Number of |
|
Average |
|
Part of Publicly |
|
Purchased Under the |
|
|
Shares |
|
Price Paid |
|
Announced Plans or |
|
Plans or Programs |
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
per Share |
|
Programs |
|
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
01/01/08 01/31/08 |
|
|
35,399 |
|
|
$ |
18.42 |
|
|
|
35,399 |
|
|
$ |
1,827,000 |
|
02/01/08 02/29/08 |
|
|
14,700 |
|
|
|
19.36 |
|
|
|
14,700 |
|
|
|
1,543,000 |
|
03/01/08 03/31/08 |
|
|
20,103 |
|
|
|
18.27 |
|
|
|
20,103 |
|
|
|
1,176,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
70,202 |
|
|
$ |
18.57 |
|
|
|
70,202 |
|
|
$ |
1,176,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
On July 25, 2007, the Companys Board of Directors approved a one-year, $5.0 million common
stock repurchase program. Under the program, stock repurchases may be made either in the open
market or through privately negotiated transactions. |
31
Item 6. Exhibits
The following is a list of all exhibits filed or incorporated by reference as part of this Report.
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
Location |
|
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of
Incorporation
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1
of the Registrants Registration Statement
on Form S-1 dated June 25, 1999
(File No. 333-76865)
(The S-1 Registration Statement) |
|
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws dated
May 23, 2001
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2
of the Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2001, dated March 11, 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws dated
February 18, 2004
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3
of the Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2003, dated March 12, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws dated
February 22, 2006
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4
of the Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2005, dated March 15, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
1999 Management Stock Incentive Plan
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1
of the S-1 Registration Statement |
|
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Amendment Number One to the FII
1999 Management Stock Incentive Plan
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1
of the Form 8-K, dated July 28, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option
Agreement Pursuant to the FII
1999 Management Stock Incentive Plan
(applies to July 2006 and 2007 options)
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2
of the Form 8-K, dated July 28, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Award
Agreement Pursuant to the FII
1999 Management Stock Incentive Plan
(applies to July 2006 and 2007 RSAs)
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3
of the Form 8-K, dated July 28, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Award
Agreement Pursuant to the FII
1999 Management Stock Incentive Plan
(applies to January 2008 RSAs)
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1
of the Form 8-K, dated January 23, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
1999 Directors Stock Incentive Plan
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2
of the S-1 Registration Statement |
|
|
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
Stock Ownership Requirements
(effective January 1, 2005)
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4
of the Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2004, dated March 16, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
Amended Stock Ownership Requirements,
dated December 14, 2005
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19
of the Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2005, dated March 15, 2006 |
32
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
Location |
|
|
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
Executive Agreement with Peter G. Humphrey
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1
of the Form 8-K, dated June 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.10
|
|
Executive Agreement with James T. Rudgers
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2
of the Form 8-K, dated June 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.11
|
|
Executive Agreement with Ronald A. Miller
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3
of the Form 8-K, dated June 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.12
|
|
Executive Agreement with Martin K. Birmingham
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4
of the Form 8-K, dated June 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.13
|
|
Agreement with Peter G. Humphrey
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6
of the Form 8-K, dated June 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.14
|
|
Executive Agreement with John J. Witkowski
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7
of the Form 8-K, dated September 14, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.15
|
|
Executive Agreement with George D. Hagi
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7
of the Form 8-K, dated February 2, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
11.1
|
|
Statement of Computation of Per Share Earnings
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Note 3 of the
Registrants unaudited consolidated financial
statements under Item 1 filed herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 CEO
|
|
Filed Herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 CFO
|
|
Filed Herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 CEO
|
|
Filed Herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 CFO
|
|
Filed Herewith |
33
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
Signatures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 6, 2008
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Peter G. Humphrey
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peter G. Humphrey |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 6, 2008
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Ronald A. Miller
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ronald A. Miller |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice President |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
|
34