Transcat, Inc. 10-K
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
FORM 10-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Mark one)
|
|
|
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
For the fiscal year ended:
March 29, 2008
|
or
|
|
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
For the transition period from
to
|
Commission File Number:
000-03905
TRANSCAT, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Ohio
|
|
16-0874418
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
35 Vantage Point Drive, Rochester, New York 14624
(Address of principal executive
offices) (Zip Code)
(585) 352-7777
(Registrants telephone
number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to section 12(b) of the
Act:
Common Stock, $0.50 par value per share
Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the
Act:
None
(Title of class)
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of Registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
Large
accelerated
filer o
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer þ
|
Smaller
reporting
company o
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the
Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common
equity held by non-affiliates of the Registrant on
September 29, 2007 (the last business day of the
registrants most recently completed second fiscal quarter)
was approximately $39 million. The market value calculation
was determined using the closing sale price of the
Registrants Common Stock on September 29, 2007, as
reported on the NASDAQ Capital Market.
The number of shares of Common Stock of the Registrant
outstanding as of June 20, 2008 was 7,173,911.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
The information required by Part III, Items 10, 11,
12, 13 and 14 of this report, to the extent not set forth
herein, is incorporated by reference from the Registrants
definitive proxy statement relating to the Annual Meeting of
Shareholders to be held on August 19, 2008, which
definitive proxy statement will be filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC) within 120 days of
the end of the fiscal year to which this report relates.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
PART I
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
This report and, in particular, the Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations section of this report, contains forward-looking
statements as defined by the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995. These include statements concerning
expectations, estimates, and projections about the industry,
management beliefs and assumptions of Transcat, Inc.
(Transcat, we, us, or
our). Words such as anticipates,
expects, intends, plans,
believes, seeks, estimates,
and variations of such words and similar expressions are
intended to identify such forward-looking statements. These
statements are not guarantees of future performance and are
subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are
difficult to forecast. Therefore, our actual results and
outcomes may materially differ from those expressed or forecast
in any such forward-looking statements. We undertake no
obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements,
whether as a result of new information, future events or
otherwise.
INTRODUCTION
Transcat is a leading global distributor of professional grade
test and measurement instruments and a provider of calibration,
3-D metrology and repair services primarily to the life science,
manufacturing, utility and process industries. We conduct our
business through two segments: distribution products
(distribution products or Product) and
calibration services (calibration services or
Service).
Through our distribution products segment, we market and
distribute national and proprietary brand instruments to
approximately 12,500 global customers. Our product catalog
(Master Catalog) offers access to more than 25,000
test and measurement instruments, including: calibrators,
insulation testers, multimeters, pressure and temperature
devices, oscilloscopes, recorders and related accessories, from
over 200 of the industrys leading manufacturers including
Agilent, Fluke, GE, Emerson, and Hart Scientific. In addition,
we are the exclusive worldwide distributor for Transmation and
Altek products. The majority of the instrumentation we sell
requires expert calibration service to ensure that it maintains
the most precise measurements.
Through our calibration services segment, we offer precise,
reliable, fast calibration,
3-D
metrology and repair services. As of the end of our fiscal year
ended March 29, 2008, (fiscal year 2008), we
operated eleven calibration laboratories (Calibration
Centers of Excellence) strategically located across the
United States, Puerto Rico, and Canada servicing approximately
8,000 customers. Each of our Calibration Centers of Excellence
is ISO-9001:2000 and we have adopted one of the broadest scopes
of accreditation in the industry, achieving several
international levels of quality, consistency and reliability.
See Calibration Services Segment Quality
below in this Item 1 for more information.
CalTrak®,
our proprietary documentation and asset management system, is
used to manage the workflow at our Calibration Centers of
Excellence. Additionally, CalTrak-Online provides our customers
direct access to calibration certificates, calibration data, and
access to other key documents required in the calibration
process.
CalTrak®
has been validated to U.S federal regulation 21CFR 820.75,
which is important to the life science industry, where federal
regulations are particularly stringent. See the section entitled
Calibration Services Segment
CalTrak®
below in this Item 1 for more information.
At Transcat, our attention to quality goes beyond the products
and services we deliver. Our sales, customer service and support
teams stand ready to provide expert advice, application
assistance and technical support wherever and whenever our
customers need it. Since calibration is an intangible service,
we believe that our customers trust the integrity of our people
and processes which form the foundation of our relationships
with our customers.
Among our customers, and representing approximately 33% of our
consolidated revenue, are Fortune 500/Global 500 companies,
including Wyeth, Johnson & Johnson, DuPont, Exxon
Mobil, Dow Chemical, and Duke Energy. Transcat has focused on
the life science, manufacturing, utility and process markets
since its founding in 1964.
3
We are the leading supplier of calibrators in the markets we
serve. We believe our customers do business with us because of
our integrity, commitment to quality service, our
CalTrak®
asset management system, and our broad range of product
offerings.
We are subject to the informational requirements of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and, therefore, we file periodic
reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC.
Such reports may be read and copied at the Public Reference Room
of the SEC at 100 F Street NE, Washington, D.C.
20549. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room
may be obtained by calling the SEC at (800) SEC-0330.
Additionally, the SEC maintains a website (www.sec.gov) that
contains reports, proxy statements and other information for
registrants that file electronically.
We maintain a website at www.transcat.com. On our website, we
make available, free of charge, documents we file with the SEC,
including our Annual Reports on
Form 10-K,
Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q,
Current Reports on
Form 8-K
and any amendments to those reports filed with or furnished to
the SEC. We make this information available as soon as
reasonably practicable after we electronically file such
materials with, or furnish such information to, the SEC. Our SEC
reports can be accessed under our investor relations webpage at
www.transcat.com/about/investor-relations.aspx. The other
information found on our website is not part of this or any
other report we file with, or furnish to, the SEC.
Our board of directors committee charters (audit
committee, compensation committee and corporate governance and
nominating committee), and Code of Ethics are also posted on our
investor relations webpage. Copies of such charters are
available in print to any shareholder who makes a request. Such
requests should be made to our corporate secretary at our
corporate headquarters.
Transcat is an Ohio corporation founded in 1964. We are
headquartered in Rochester, New York and employ more than
200 people. Our executive offices are located at 35 Vantage
Point Drive, Rochester, New York 14624. Our telephone number is
585-352-7777.
STRATEGY
We are an accredited provider of calibration and repair services
and a distributor of premium brand test and measurement
instruments. Our target customers are those who value quality
systems
and/or
operate in regulated environments. Our strategic focus is to
serve a customer base that requires precise measurement
capability for their manufacturing and testing processes in
order to minimize risk, waste and defects. We do this by
targeting customers who value superior quality, service and
convenience associated with our multiple locations, broad
capabilities and breadth of choice. We leverage our combined
offerings to create a unique and compelling value proposition
built upon trust and technical competence.
We strive to differentiate ourselves and build barriers to
competitive entry by offering the best products, delivering high
quality through the trusted integrity of our calibration and
repair services, and integrating those products and services to
benefit our customers operations and lower their costs.
SEGMENTS
We service our customers through two business segments:
distribution products and calibration services. Note 8 of
our Consolidated Financial Statements in this report presents
financial information for these segments. We serve approximately
16,000 customers, with no customer or controlled group of
customers accounting for 5% or more of our consolidated net
revenue for fiscal years 2006 through 2008. We are not dependent
on any single customer, the loss of which would have a material
adverse effect on our business, cash flows, balance sheet, or
results of operations.
We market and sell to our customers through multiple sales
channels consisting of direct catalog marketing, our website, a
field sales organization, proactive outbound sales, and an
inbound call center. Our field, outbound and inbound sales teams
are each staffed with technically trained personnel. Our
domestic and international outbound sales organization covers
territories in North America, Latin America, Europe, Africa,
Asia, and the Middle East. Our calibration and repair services
are offered only in North America and Puerto Rico. We
concentrate on attracting new customers and increasing product,
calibration and repair revenue from
4
existing customers. Our efforts are also focused on cross
selling. Approximately 30% of our customers during fiscal year
2008 utilized both segments of our business at least once, which
provides us with an opportunity to increase our average revenue
per customer, while adding to our value as a single source
supplier. Our revenue from customers in the following geographic
areas during the periods indicated, expressed as a percentage of
total revenue, was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2008
|
|
|
FY 2007
|
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
84
|
%
|
|
|
83
|
%
|
|
|
84
|
%
|
Canada
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
Other International
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We focus primarily on the life science, manufacturing, utility
and process industries. The life science industry, as we define
it, includes pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, medical
device manufacturers, and healthcare service providers. The
process industry has been and continues to be the foundation of
our business competency. The process industry, as we define it,
includes petroleum refining, chemical, water treatment,
industrial power, steel, petrochemical, gas and pipeline,
textile, pulp and paper, and food and dairy companies.
DISTRIBUTION
PRODUCTS SEGMENT
Summary. Our customers use test and
measurement instruments to ensure that their processes, and
ultimately their end product(s), are within specification.
Utilization of such diagnostic instrumentation also allows for
continuous improvement processes to be in place, increasing the
accuracies of their measurements. The industrial distribution
products industry for test and measurement instrumentation, in
those geographic markets where we predominately operate, is
serviced by broad based national distributors and niche or
specialty-focused organizations such as Transcat.
Most industrial customers find that maintaining an in-house
inventory of
back-up test
and measurement instruments is cost prohibitive. As a result,
the distribution of test and measurement instrumentation has
traditionally been characterized by frequent, small quantity
orders combined with a need for rapid, reliable, and complete
order fulfillment. The purchasing decision is generally made by
plant engineers, quality managers, or their purchasing
personnel. Products are generally purchased from more than one
distributor.
The majority of our products are not consumables, but are
purchased as replacements, upgrades, or for expansion of
manufacturing and research and development facilities. Our
catalog and sales activities are designed to maintain a constant
presence in front of the customer to ensure we receive the order
when they are ready to purchase. As a result, we evaluate
revenue trends over at least a four quarter cycle as any
individual months revenue can be impacted by numerous
factors, many of which are unpredictable and potentially
non-recurring.
We believe that a distribution product customer chooses a
distributor based on a number of different criteria including
the timely delivery and the accuracy of orders, consistent
product quality, value added services and price. Value added
services include providing technical support to insure our
customer receives the right product for their specific need
through application knowledge and product compatibility. We also
provide calibration of product purchases, on-line procurement,
same day shipment of products for in-stock items, a variety of
custom product offerings and training programs. Our customers
also get the operational efficiency of dealing with one
distributor for most or all of their product needs.
Our distribution products segment accounted for approximately
67% of our consolidated revenue in fiscal year 2008. Within the
distribution products segment, our routine business is comprised
of customers who place orders to acquire or to replace specific
instruments, which range from less than $250 to $100,000 per
order, with an average of approximately $1,500 per order.
Marketing and Sales. Through our
comprehensive Master Catalog, supplemental catalogs, website,
opt-in email newsletter, and other direct sales and marketing
programs, we offer our customers a broad selection of
5
highly recognized branded products at competitive prices. The
instruments typically range in price from $250 to over $25,000.
During fiscal year 2008, we distributed approximately
1.1 million pieces of direct marketing materials including
catalogs, brochures, supplements and other promotional
materials, of which approximately 665,000 were distributed to
customer contacts and approximately 450,000 were distributed to
potential customer contacts. Some of the key factors that
determine the number of catalogs and other direct marketing
materials received by each customer include new product
introductions, their market segments and the timing, frequency
and monetary value of past purchases.
The majority of our product sales are derived from direct mail
and on-line marketing. Our Master Catalog consists of
approximately 700 pages of products relevant to the life
science, manufacturing, utility and process industries. We
distribute our Master Catalog to approximately 89,000 existing
and prospective customers in the United States and Canada
typically every 12 months. The Master Catalog provides
standard make/model and related information and is also
available in an electronic format upon request and on-line on
our website. Our new customer acquisition program utilizes
smaller catalog supplements that feature new products,
promotions, or specific product categories. The catalog
supplements are launched at varying periods throughout the year;
the publications are mailed to approximately 1.0 million
customers and targeted prospects.
Our website provides advanced product search features and
downloadable product specification sheets for our current and
prospective customers. Recent updates to our website include a
redesign for search engine optimization, streamlined order entry
and the unique ability to add an accredited calibration of test
equipment to an order. The result of these efforts has increased
traffic to our website more than three-fold over the past two
years.
Competition. The distribution product
markets we serve are highly competitive. Competition for sales
in distribution products is quite fragmented and ranges from
large national distributors and manufacturers to small local
distribution organizations. Key competitive factors typically
include customer service and support, quality, turn around time,
inventory availability, product brand name, and price. To
address our customers needs for technical support and
product application assistance, and to differentiate ourselves
from competitors, we employ a staff of highly trained technical
application specialists. To maintain our competitive position
with respect to such products and services, we continually
demonstrate our commitment to our customers by providing
technical training for our employees in the areas described
above.
Suppliers and Purchasing. We believe
that effective purchasing is a key element to maintaining and
enhancing our position as a provider of high quality test and
measurement instruments. We frequently evaluate our purchase
requirements and suppliers offerings to obtain products at
the best possible cost. We obtain our products from more than
230 suppliers of brand name and private labeled equipment. In
fiscal year 2008, our top 10 vendors accounted for approximately
73% of our aggregate business. Approximately 31% of our product
purchases on an annual basis are from Fluke Electronics
Corporation (Fluke), which we believe to be
consistent with Flukes share of the markets we service.
We plan our product mix to best serve the anticipated needs of
our customers whose individual purchases vary in size. We can
usually ship our customers our top selling products the same day
they are ordered. During fiscal year 2008, approximately 88% of
orders for our top selling products were filled with inventory
items already in stock.
Operations. Our distribution operations
take place within an approximate 27,000 square-foot
facility located in Rochester, New York. This location serves as
our corporate headquarters and also houses our customer service,
sales and administrative functions as well as a calibration
laboratory. Approximately 32,000 product orders are shipped from
this facility annually with an average order size of
approximately $1,500 per order in fiscal year 2008, $1,500 per
order in our fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 (fiscal
year 2007) and $1,400 per order in our fiscal year ended
March 25, 2006 (fiscal year 2006).
Distribution. We distribute our
products throughout North America and internationally from our
distribution center in Rochester, New York. We maintain
appropriate inventory levels in order to satisfy anticipated
customer demand for prompt delivery and complete order
fulfillment of their product needs. These inventory
6
levels are managed on a daily basis with the aid of our
sophisticated purchasing and stock management information
system. Our automated laser bar code scanning facilitates prompt
and accurate order fulfillment and freight manifesting.
In addition to our direct end-user customers, we also sell
products to resellers who then sell to end-users. Our sales to
resellers are typically at a lower gross margin than sales to
direct customers and therefore the percentage of reseller sales
to total revenue in any given period can have an impact on our
overall gross profit margin. During fiscal year 2008,
approximately 14% of our product sales were to resellers
compared with 16% in fiscal year 2007 and 14% in fiscal year
2006. We believe that these resellers have access, through their
existing relationships, to end-user customers to whom we do not
market directly.
Exclusivity Agreement. Since fiscal
year 2002, we have been the exclusive worldwide distributor of
Altek and Transmation branded products. In exchange for
exclusive distribution rights, we committed to purchase a
minimum amount of Altek and Transmation products from Fluke. Our
purchases for calendar year 2007, as in every calendar year
since 2002, exceeded the commitment. By its terms, the
exclusivity agreement terminated on December 31, 2007.
Fluke has agreed to extend the exclusivity agreement through
December 31, 2008 while we negotiate a new agreement beyond
calendar year 2008. The minimum amount of purchases for calendar
year 2008 is $4.0 million, which we believe will be
achieved based on historical sales trends. In the event that
Transcat fails to make the required purchases, it may lose its
right to be the exclusive worldwide distributor.
Backlog. Customer product orders
include orders for products that we routinely stock in our
inventory, customized products, and other products ordered less
frequently, which we do not stock.
Pending product shipments are primarily backorders, but also
include products that are requested to be calibrated in our
calibration laboratories prior to shipment, orders required to
be shipped complete, orders awaiting credit approval and orders
required to be shipped at a future date.
At March 29, 2008, the value of our pending product
shipments was approximately $1.4 million, compared with
approximately $1.8 million and $1.4 million at the end
of the fiscal years 2007 and 2006, respectively. At
March 31, 2007, pending product shipments included a
$0.4 million remaining balance on an order related to a
single customer. At the request of the customer, this specific
order was shipped over several months. During fiscal year 2008,
the month-end level of pending product shipments varied between
a low of $1.4 million and a high of $1.9 million. This
normal variation is due primarily to seasonality, supplier
delivery schedules and variations in customer ordering patterns.
The following graph shows the quarter end trend of pending
product shipments and backorders for fiscal years 2007 and 2008.
CALIBRATION
SERVICES SEGMENT
Summary. Calibration is the act of
comparing a unit or instrument of unknown value to a standard of
known value and reporting the result in some rigorously defined
form. After the calibration has been completed, a decision is
made, again based on rigorously defined parameters, on what is
to be done to the unit to conform
7
with the required standards or specifications. The decision may
be to adjust, optimize or repair a unit; limit the use, range or
rating of a unit; scrap the unit; or leave the unit as is. The
purpose of calibration is to significantly reduce the risk of
product or process failures caused by inaccurate measurements.
The billion-dollar commercial calibration services industry in
the United States is extremely fragmented with companies ranging
from nationally accredited organizations, such as Transcat, to
non-accredited, sole proprietors as well as companies that
perform their own calibrations in-house. Our typical customer
contact is a technically knowledgeable individual, employed in a
mid- to high level quality, engineering or manufacturing
position.
Within the calibration industry, there is a broad array of
measurement disciplines making it costly and inefficient for any
one provider to invest the needed capital for facilities,
equipment and uniquely trained personnel necessary to perform
all calibrations in-house. Our strategy, within our calibration
services segment, has been to focus our investments in the core
electrical, temperature, pressure and dimensional disciplines.
Accordingly, in servicing our customers calibration needs
in these highly technical disciplines, we have historically
subcontracted to outside vendors, including those with unique or
proprietary capabilities, 15% to 20% of the instruments we
receive from customers for calibration. These vendor
relationships have enabled us to continue our pursuit of having
the broadest calibration offerings to these targeted markets.
Strategy. We believe calibration
sourcing decisions are based on quality, customer service,
turn-around time, location, documentation, price, and a
one-source solution. Our success with customers who value
quality is based on the trust they have in the integrity of our
people and processes.
Transcats calibration strategy encompasses two methods to
manage a customers calibration and repair needs:
|
|
|
|
1)
|
If a company wishes to outsource its calibration needs, we offer
an Integrated Calibration Services Solution that
provides a complete wrap-around service:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Program management;
|
|
|
Calibration;
|
|
|
Logistics; and
|
|
|
Consultation services.
|
|
|
|
|
2)
|
If a company has an in-house calibration operation, we can
provide:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calibration of primary standards;
|
|
|
Overflow capability either
on-site or
at one of our Calibration Centers of Excellence during periods
of high demand; and
|
|
|
Consultation and training services.
|
In either case, we strive to have the broadest accredited
calibration offering to our targeted markets which includes
certification of our technicians pursuant to the American
Society for Quality (ASQ) standards, complete
calibration management encompassing the entire metrology
function, and access to our service offerings.
Overall, the calibration services market is aligned with our
strategic focus on quality accreditations. We believe our
calibration services are of the highest technical and quality
levels, with broad ranges of accreditation and registration. Our
quality systems are further detailed below in the section
entitled Quality below.
Our calibration services segment provides periodic calibration,
3-D
metrology and repair services for our customers test and
measurement instruments. We perform over 125,000 in-house
calibrations annually. These are performed at our eleven
Calibration Centers of Excellence or at the customers
location. During fiscal year 2008, services completed by our
Calibration Centers of Excellence, represented approximately 80%
of our calibration services segment revenue while 18% of the
revenue was derived from calibration services that were
subcontracted to outside vendors. Our calibration services
segment accounted for approximately 33% of our total fiscal year
2008 consolidated revenue.
The calibration services industry has its origins in the
military. Approximately 60% of our calibration technicians and
laboratory managers received metrology training in the military
or have had calibration
8
experience with the military prior to joining Transcat. In
addition, 20% of our calibration technicians and laboratory
managers have earned the Certified Calibration Technician
designation issued by the ASQ.
Marketing and Sales. Calibration
improves an operations maximum productivity and efficiency
by assuring accurate, reliable instruments and processes.
Through our calibration services segment, we perform periodic
calibrations on new and used instruments as well as repair
services for our customers. All of our Calibration Centers of
Excellence provide accredited calibration of common measurement
parameters.
We utilize our Master Catalog, supplements, mailings, journal
advertising, trade shows, and the Internet to market our
calibration services to customers and prospective customers with
a strategic focus in the highly regulated industries including
life science, manufacturing, utility and process. Our quality
process and standards are designed to meet the needs of
companies that are highly regulated (e.g., the Food and Drug
Administration),
and/or have
a strong commitment to quality and a comprehensive calibration
program.
The approximate percentage of our calibration services business
by industry segment for the periods indicated was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2008
|
|
|
FY 2007
|
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
|
Life Science
|
|
|
36
|
%
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
36
|
%
|
Manufacturing
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
Utility
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
Process
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Competition. The calibration outsource
industry is highly fragmented and is composed of companies
ranging in size from non-accredited, sole proprietors to
internationally recognized and accredited corporations, such as
Transcat, resulting in a tremendous range of service levels and
capabilities. A large percentage of calibration companies are
small businesses that provide only basic measurements and
service markets in which quality requirements may not be as
demanding as the markets that we strategically target. Very few
of these companies are structured to compete on the same scale
and level of quality as us. There are also several competitors
with whom we compete who have national or regional operations.
Certain of these competitors may have greater resources than we
have and some of them have accreditations that are similar to
ours. We differentiate ourselves from our competitors by
demonstrating our commitment to quality and by having a wide
range of capabilities that are tailored to the markets we serve.
Customers also see the value in using CalTrak-Online to monitor
their instruments status. We are also fundamentally
different from most of our competitors because we have the
ability to bundle product, calibration and repair as a single
source for our customers.
Quality. The accreditation process is
the only system currently in existence that assures measurement
competence. Each of our laboratories is audited and reviewed by
external accreditation bodies proficient in the technical
aspects of the chemistry and physics that underlie metrology,
ensuring that measurements are properly made. Accreditation also
requires that all standards used for accredited measurements
have a fully documented path, known as the traceability chain,
either directly or through other accredited laboratories, back
to the national or international standard for that measurement
parameter. This ensures that our measurement process is
consistent with the global metrology network that is designed to
standardize measurements worldwide.
To ensure the quality and consistency of our calibrations for
our customers, we have sought and achieved several international
levels of quality and accreditation. Our calibration
laboratories are ISO 9001:2000 registered through
Underwriters Laboratories, which itself has international
oversight from the ANSI-ASQ National Accreditation Board
(ANAB). We believe our scope of accreditation to
ISO/IEC 17025 to be the broadest for the industries we serve.
The accreditation process also ensures that our calibrations are
traceable to the National Institute of Standards and Technology
(NIST) or the National Research Council
(NRC) (these are the National Measurement Institutes
for the United States and Canada, respectively), or to other
9
national or international standards bodies, or to measurable
conditions created in our laboratory, or accepted fundamental
and/or
natural physical constants, ratio type of calibration, or by
comparison to consensus standards. Our laboratories are
accredited to ISO/IEC 17025 and ANSI/NCSL Z540-1-1994 using two
of the four accrediting bodies (ABs) in the
United States that are signatories to the International
Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC). These
two ABs are: American Association for Laboratory
Accreditation (A2LA) and National Voluntary
Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP). These
ABs provide an objective, third party, internationally
accepted evaluation of the quality, consistency, and competency
of our calibration processes.
The importance of this international oversight, ILAC, to our
customers is the assurance that our documents will be accepted
worldwide, removing one of the barriers to trade that they may
experience if using a non-ILAC traceable calibration service
provider.
To provide the widest range of service to our customers in our
target markets, our ISO-17025 accreditations extend across many
technical disciplines. The following table represents our
capabilities for each Center of Excellence as of March 29,
2008 (A=Accredited; N=Non-accredited):
WORKING-LEVEL CAPABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electrical Metrology Disciplines
|
|
Dimensional Metrology Disciplines
|
|
|
Direct
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parts
|
|
|
Current/
|
|
High
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inspection
|
|
|
Alternating
|
|
Frequency/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Geometric
|
|
|
Current
|
|
Ultra
|
|
Radio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dimensioning
|
|
|
- Low
|
|
- High
|
|
Frequency/
|
|
Luminance/
|
|
|
|
|
|
& Tolerance/
|
|
|
Frequency
|
|
Frequency
|
|
Microwave
|
|
Illuminance
|
|
Length
|
|
Optics
|
|
3-D Metrology)
|
|
Boston
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
Charlotte
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
Dayton
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
Ft. Wayne
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
A
|
Houston
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
N
|
|
|
Anaheim
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
N
|
|
|
Ottawa
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
Cherry Hill
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
Rochester(1)
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
N
|
San Juan
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
St. Louis
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Physical Metrology Disciplines
|
|
|
|
|
Particle
|
|
|
|
Gas
|
|
Relative
|
|
Mass
|
|
Pressure,
|
|
|
Flow
|
|
Counters
|
|
Force
|
|
Analysis
|
|
Humidity
|
|
Weight
|
|
Vacuum
|
|
Boston
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
Charlotte
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
N
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
Dayton
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
Ft. Wayne
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Houston
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
Anaheim
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
Ottawa
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
Cherry Hill
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
N
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
Rochester
|
|
|
|
N
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
San Juan
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
St. Louis
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Physical Metrology Disciplines (continued)
|
|
Life Sciences Disciplines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolutions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Minute,
|
|
Vibration,
|
|
Chemical/
|
|
|
Torque
|
|
Temperature
|
|
Speed
|
|
Acceleration
|
|
Biological
|
|
Boston
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
N
|
Charlotte
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
N
|
Dayton
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
N
|
Ft. Wayne
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Houston
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
N
|
Anaheim
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
N
|
Ottawa
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
Cherry Hill
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
N
|
Rochester
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
N
|
San Juan
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
St. Louis
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
N
|
REFERENCE-LEVEL CAPABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pressure/
|
|
|
|
|
Dimensional
|
|
Electrical
|
|
Humidity
|
|
Mass
|
|
Vacuum
|
|
Temperature
|
|
|
Standards
|
|
Standards
|
|
Standards
|
|
Standards
|
|
Standards
|
|
Standards
|
|
Charlotte(2)
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dayton
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
Ft. Wayne
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Houston
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
Cherry Hill
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
Rochester
|
|
N
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
San Juan
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Our Rochester laboratory expects to
be capable of performing accredited calibrations for
GD&T/3-D Metrology applications and Dimensional Standards
following an upcoming audit by A2LA.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Our Charlotte laboratory will be
capable of performing accredited calibrations for Humidity
pending the release of the most recent scope of accreditation by
A2LA.
|
CalTrak®. CalTrak®
and CalTrak-Online are our proprietary metrology management
systems that provide a comprehensive calibration quality
program. Many of our customers have unique calibration service
requirements to which we have tailored specific services.
CalTrak-Online allows our customers to track calibration cycles
via the Internet and provides the customer with a safe and
secure off-site archive of calibration records that can be
accessed 24 hours a day. Access to records data is managed
through our secure password protected website. Calibration
assets are tracked with records that are automatically
cross-referenced to the equipment that was used to calibrate.
CalTrak®
has also been validated to meet the most stringent requirements
within the industry.
CUSTOMER
SERVICE AND SUPPORT
Our breadth of distribution products and calibration services
along with our strong commitment to customer sales, service and
support enable us to satisfy our customer needs through
convenient selection and ordering, rapid, accurate, and complete
order fulfillment and on-time delivery.
Key elements of our customer service approach are our
technically trained field sales team, outbound sales team,
inbound sales and customer service organization. Most customer
orders are placed through our customer service organization
which often provides technical assistance to our customers to
facilitate the purchasing decision. To ensure the quality of
service provided, we frequently monitor our customer service
through customer surveys, interpersonal communication, and daily
statistical reports.
11
Customers may place orders via:
|
|
|
Mail to Transcat, Inc., 35 Vantage Point Drive, Rochester, NY
14624;
|
|
Fax at
1-800-395-0543;
|
|
Telephone at
1-800-828-1470;
|
|
Email at sales@transcat.com; or
|
|
Our website at www.transcat.com.
|
INFORMATION
REGARDING EXPORT SALES
Approximately 16% of our net revenue in each of fiscal years
2008 and 2006 and 17% in fiscal year 2007 resulted from sales to
customers outside the United States. Of those sales in fiscal
year 2008, 50% were denominated in U.S. dollars and the
remaining 50% were in Canadian dollars. Our revenue is subject
to the customary risks of operating in an international
environment, including the potential imposition of trade or
foreign exchange restrictions, tariff and other tax increases,
fluctuations in exchange rates and unstable political
situations, any one or more of which could have a material
adverse effect on our business, cash flows, balance sheet or
results of operations. See the section entitled Foreign
Currency in Item 7A of Part II of this report
for further details.
INFORMATION
SYSTEMS
We utilize a basic software platform, Application Plus, to
manage our business and operations segments. We also utilize a
turnkey enterprise software solution. This software includes a
suite of fully integrated modules to manage our business
functions, including customer service, warehouse management,
inventory management, financial management, customer management,
and business intelligence. This solution is a fully mature
business package and has been subject to more than 20 years
of refinement.
SEASONALITY
We believe that our line of business has certain historical
seasonal factors. Our fiscal second quarter is generally weaker
and our fiscal fourth quarter has historically been stronger due
to typical industrial operating cycles.
ENVIRONMENTAL
MATTERS
We believe that compliance with federal, state, or local
provisions relating to the protection of the environment will
not have any material effect on our capital expenditures,
earnings, or competitive position.
EMPLOYEES
At the end of fiscal year 2008, we had 247 employees,
compared with 228 and 238 employees at the end of fiscal
years 2007 and 2006, respectively.
12
EXECUTIVE
OFFICERS
The following table sets forth certain information regarding our
executive officers and certain key employees as of
March 29, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
|
Charles P. Hadeed
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Operating Officer
|
John J. Zimmer
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer
|
John A. De Voldre
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
Vice President of Human Resources
|
Jay F. Woychick
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
Vice President of Marketing
|
John P. Hennessy
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
Vice President of Sales
|
Rainer Stellrecht
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
Vice President of Laboratory Operations
|
Lori L. Drescher
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
Vice President of Business Process Improvement and Training
|
Derek C. Hurlburt
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
Corporate Controller
|
ITEM 1A. RISK
FACTORS
You should consider carefully the following risks and all other
information included in this report. The risks and uncertainties
described below and elsewhere in this report are not the only
ones facing our business. If any of the following risks were to
actually occur, our business, financial condition or results of
operations would likely suffer. In that case, the trading price
of our common stock could fall and you could lose all or part of
your investment.
General Economic Conditions May Have A Material Adverse
Effect On Our Operating Results, Financial Condition, Or Our
Ability To Meet Our Commitments. The test and
measurement instrument distribution industry is affected by
changes in economic conditions, which are outside our control.
Economic slowdowns, adverse economic conditions or cyclical
trends in certain customer markets may have a material adverse
effect on our operating results, financial condition, or our
ability to meet our commitments.
We Depend On Manufacturers To Supply Our Inventory And
Rely On One Vendor Group To Supply A Significant Amount Of Our
Inventory Purchases. If They Fail To Provide Desired Products To
Us, Increase Prices, Or Fail To Timely Deliver Products, Our
Revenue Could Suffer. A significant amount of
our inventory purchases are made from one vendor, Fluke. Our
reliance on this vendor leaves us vulnerable to having an
inadequate supply of required products, price increases, late
deliveries, and poor product quality. Like other distributors in
our industry, we occasionally experience supplier shortages and
are unable to purchase our desired volume of products. If we are
unable to enter into and maintain satisfactory distribution
arrangements with leading manufacturers, if we are unable to
maintain an adequate supply of products, or if manufacturers do
not regularly invest in, introduce to us,
and/or make
available to us for distribution new products, our sales could
suffer considerably. Finally, we cannot provide any assurance
that particular products, or product lines, will be available to
us, or available in quantities sufficient to meet customer
demand. This is of particular significance to our business
because the products we sell are often only available from one
source. Any limits to product access could materially and
adversely affect our business.
Our Future Success May Be Affected By Future
Indebtedness. Under our revolving credit
facility, as of March 29, 2008, we owed $0.3 million
to our secured creditor. We may borrow additional funds in the
future to support our growth and working capital needs. We are
required to meet financial tests on a quarterly basis and comply
with other covenants customary in secured financings. Although
we believe that we will continue to be in compliance with such
covenants, if we do not remain in compliance with such
covenants, our lender may demand immediate repayment of amounts
outstanding. Changes in interest rates may have a significant
effect on our payment obligations and operating results.
Furthermore, we are dependent on credit from manufacturers of
our products to fund our inventory purchases. If our debt burden
increases to high levels, such manufacturers may restrict our
credit. Our cash requirements will depend on numerous factors,
including
13
the rate of growth of our revenues, the timing and levels of
products purchased, payment terms, and credit limits from
manufacturers, the timing and level of our accounts receivable
collections and our ability to manage our business profitably.
Our ability to satisfy our existing obligations, whether or not
under our secured credit facility, will depend upon our future
operating performance, which may be impacted by prevailing
economic conditions and financial, business, and other factors
described in this report, many of which are beyond our control.
If Existing Shareholders Sell Large Numbers Of Shares Of
Our Common Stock, Our Stock Price Could
Decline. The market price of our common stock
could decline as a result of sales by our existing shareholders
or holders of stock options of a large number of shares of our
common stock in the public market or the perception that these
sales could occur.
Our Stock Price Has Been, And May Continue To Be,
Volatile. The stock market, from time to
time, has experienced significant price and volume fluctuations
that are both related and unrelated to the operating performance
of companies. As our stock may be affected by market volatility,
and by our own performance, the following factors, among others,
may have a significant effect on the market price of our common
stock:
|
|
|
|
|
Developments in our relationships with current or future
manufacturers of products we distribute;
|
|
|
Announcements by us or our competitors of significant
acquisitions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital
commitments;
|
|
|
Litigation or governmental proceedings or announcements
involving us or our industry;
|
|
|
Economic and other external factors, such as disasters or other
crises;
|
|
|
Sales of our common stock or other securities in the open market;
|
|
|
Period-to-period fluctuations in our operating results; and
|
|
|
Our ability to satisfy our debt obligations.
|
We Expect That Our Quarterly Results Of Operations Will
Fluctuate. Such Fluctuation Could Cause Our Stock Price To
Decline. A large portion of our expenses for
calibration services, including expenses for facilities,
equipment and personnel, are relatively fixed. Accordingly, if
revenues decline or do not grow as we anticipate, we may not be
able to correspondingly reduce our operating expenses in any
particular quarter. Our quarterly revenues and operating results
have fluctuated in the past and are likely to do so in the
future. If our operating results in some quarters fail to meet
the expectations of stock market analysts and investors, our
stock price would likely decline. Some of the factors that could
cause our revenues and operating results to fluctuate include:
|
|
|
|
|
Fluctuations in industrial demand for products we sell
and/or
services we provide; and
|
|
|
Fluctuations in geographic conditions, including currency and
other economic conditions.
|
Changes In Accounting Standards, Legal Requirements And
The NASDAQ Stock Market Listing Standards, Or Our Ability To
Comply With Any Existing Requirements Or Standards, Could
Adversely Affect Our Operating
Results. Extensive reforms relating to public
company financial reporting, corporate governance and ethics,
the NASDAQ Stock Market listing standards and oversight of the
accounting profession have been implemented over the past
several years and continue to evolve. Compliance with the new
rules, regulations and standards that have resulted from such
reforms has increased our accounting and legal costs and has
required significant management time and attention. In the event
that additional rules, regulations or standards are implemented
or any of the existing rules, regulations or standards to which
we are subject undergoes additional material modification, we
could be forced to spend significant financial and management
resources to ensure our continued compliance, which could have
an adverse affect on our results of operations. In addition,
although we believe we are in full compliance with all such
existing rules, regulations and standards, should we be or
become unable to comply with any of such rules, regulations and
standards, as they presently exist or as they may exist in the
future, our results of operations could be adversely effected
and the market price of our common stock could decline.
The Distribution Products Industry Is Highly Competitive,
And We May Not Be Able To Compete
Successfully. We compete with numerous
companies, including several major manufacturers and
distributors. Some of our competitors have greater financial and
other resources than we do, which could allow them to compete
more successfully. Most of our products are available from
several sources and our customers tend to
14
have relationships with several distributors. Competitors could
obtain exclusive rights to market particular products, which we
would then be unable to market. Manufacturers could also
increase their efforts to sell directly to end-users and bypass
distributors like us. Industry consolidation among product
distributors, the unavailability of products, whether due to our
inability to gain access to products or interruptions in supply
from manufacturers, or the emergence of new competitors could
also increase competition could each adversely affect our
business or results of operations. In the future, we may be
unable to compete successfully and competitive pressures may
reduce our sales.
If We Fail To Attract And Retain Qualified Personnel, We
May Not Be Able To Achieve Our Stated Corporate
Objectives. Our ability to manage our
anticipated growth, if realized, effectively depends on our
ability to attract and retain highly qualified executive
officers and technical personnel. If we fail to attract and
retain qualified individuals, we will not be able to achieve our
stated corporate objectives.
Our Revenue Depends On Retaining Capable Sales Personnel
As Well As Our Relationships With Key Customers, Vendors And
Manufacturers Of The Products That We
Distribute. Our future operating results
depend on our ability to maintain satisfactory relationships
with qualified sales personnel who appreciate the value of our
services as well as key customers, vendors and manufacturers. If
we fail to maintain our existing relationships with such persons
or fail to acquire relationships with such key persons in the
future, our business and results of operations may be adversely
affected.
Our Future Success Is Substantially Dependent Upon Our
Senior Management. Our future success is
substantially dependent upon the efforts and abilities of
members of our existing senior management. Competition for
senior management is intense, and we may not be successful in
attracting and retaining key personnel, the inability of which
could have an adverse affect on our business and results of
operations.
Our Acquisitions May Not Result In The Benefits And
Revenue Growth We Expect. We may acquire
other companies in order to expand our market presence in either
or both of the product distribution market or the calibration
services market. We cannot be sure that we will achieve the
benefits of revenue growth that we expect from these
acquisitions or that we will not incur unforeseen additional
costs or expenses in connection with these acquisitions. To
effectively manage our expected future growth, we must continue
to successfully manage our integration of these companies and
continue to improve our operational systems, internal
procedures, accounts receivable and management, financial and
operational controls. If we fail in any of these areas, our
business could be adversely affected.
Tax Legislation Initiatives Could Adversely Affect The
Companys Net Earnings And Tax
Liabilities. We are subject to the tax laws
and regulations of the United States federal, state and local
governments, as well as foreign jurisdictions. From time to
time, various legislative initiatives may be proposed that could
adversely affect our tax positions. There can be no assurance
that our effective tax rate will not be adversely affected by
these initiatives. In addition, tax laws and regulations are
extremely complex and subject to varying interpretations.
Although we believe that our historical tax positions are sound
and consistent with applicable laws, regulations and existing
precedent, there can be no assurance that our tax positions will
not be challenged by relevant tax authorities or that we would
be successful in any such challenge.
|
|
ITEM 1B.
|
UNRESOLVED
STAFF COMMENTS
|
Not applicable.
15
We lease the following properties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate
|
|
Property
|
|
Location
|
|
Square Footage
|
|
|
Corporate Headquarters, Product Distribution Center and
Calibration Laboratory(1)
|
|
Rochester, NY
|
|
|
27,250
|
|
Calibration Laboratory
|
|
Boston, MA
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
Calibration Laboratory
|
|
Charlotte, NC
|
|
|
4,860
|
|
Calibration Laboratory
|
|
Dayton, OH
|
|
|
9,000
|
|
Calibration Laboratory
|
|
Houston, TX
|
|
|
8,780
|
|
Calibration Laboratory
|
|
Anaheim, CA
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
Calibration Laboratory
|
|
Ottawa, ON
|
|
|
3,990
|
|
Calibration Laboratory
|
|
Cherry Hill, NJ
|
|
|
8,550
|
|
Calibration Laboratory
|
|
St. Louis, MO
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
Calibration Laboratory
|
|
Fort Wayne, IN
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
Calibration Laboratory
|
|
San Juan, PR
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Subsequent to March 29, 2008, we entered into an agreement
to extend the lease on our property in Rochester, NY, which
includes an expansion of our facility by approximately
10,000 square feet. |
We believe that our properties are generally in good condition,
are well maintained, and are generally suitable and adequate to
carry on our business in its current form.
|
|
ITEM 3.
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
|
None.
|
|
ITEM 4.
|
SUBMISSION
OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
|
No matters were submitted to a vote of our shareholders during
the quarter ended March 29, 2008.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET
FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Capital Market under
the symbol TRNS. As of June 20, 2008, we had
approximately 650 shareholders of record.
PRICE
RANGE OF COMMON STOCK
The following table sets forth, on a per share basis, for the
periods indicated, the high and low reported sales prices of our
common stock as reported on the NASDAQ Capital Market for each
quarterly period in fiscal years 2008 and 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Fiscal Year 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
$
|
6.99
|
|
|
$
|
8.09
|
|
|
$
|
7.69
|
|
|
$
|
7.49
|
|
Low
|
|
$
|
4.81
|
|
|
$
|
5.46
|
|
|
$
|
3.78
|
|
|
$
|
5.13
|
|
Fiscal Year 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
$
|
5.52
|
|
|
$
|
6.08
|
|
|
$
|
5.71
|
|
|
$
|
5.87
|
|
Low
|
|
$
|
4.75
|
|
|
$
|
4.95
|
|
|
$
|
4.64
|
|
|
$
|
4.90
|
|
DIVIDENDS
We have not declared any cash dividends since our inception and
do not intend to pay any dividends for the foreseeable future.
16
|
|
ITEM 6.
|
SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA
|
The following table provides selected financial data for fiscal
year 2008 and the previous four fiscal years (in thousands,
except per share data). Certain reclassifications of financial
information for prior fiscal years have been made to conform to
the presentation for the current fiscal year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2008
|
|
|
FY 2007
|
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
|
FY 2005
|
|
|
FY 2004
|
|
|
Statements of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenues
|
|
$
|
70,453
|
|
|
$
|
66,473
|
|
|
$
|
60,471
|
|
|
$
|
55,307
|
|
|
$
|
53,317
|
|
Cost of Products and Services Sold
|
|
|
51,912
|
|
|
|
49,860
|
|
|
|
45,372
|
|
|
|
41,415
|
|
|
|
39,919
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit
|
|
|
18,541
|
|
|
|
16,613
|
|
|
|
15,099
|
|
|
|
13,892
|
|
|
|
13,398
|
|
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
15,258
|
|
|
|
14,264
|
|
|
|
13,581
|
|
|
|
12,993
|
|
|
|
13,091
|
|
Gain on TPG Divestiture(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,544
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income
|
|
|
3,283
|
|
|
|
3,893
|
|
|
|
1,518
|
|
|
|
899
|
|
|
|
307
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
334
|
|
|
|
427
|
|
|
|
350
|
|
|
|
434
|
|
Other Expense (Income), net
|
|
|
437
|
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
(288
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Before Income Taxes
|
|
|
2,745
|
|
|
|
3,276
|
|
|
|
929
|
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
Provision for (Benefit from) Income Taxes
|
|
|
382
|
|
|
|
1,217
|
|
|
|
(2,648
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(192
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
$
|
2,363
|
|
|
$
|
2,059
|
|
|
$
|
3,577
|
|
|
$
|
256
|
|
|
$
|
353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Earnings Per Share
|
|
$
|
0.33
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
$
|
0.54
|
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
Basic Average Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
7,132
|
|
|
|
6,914
|
|
|
|
6,647
|
|
|
|
6,396
|
|
|
|
6,252
|
|
Diluted Earnings Per Share
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
$
|
0.50
|
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
Diluted Average Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
7,272
|
|
|
|
7,335
|
|
|
|
7,176
|
|
|
|
6,966
|
|
|
|
6,808
|
|
Closing Price Per Share
|
|
$
|
5.50
|
|
|
$
|
5.25
|
|
|
$
|
5.00
|
|
|
$
|
3.80
|
|
|
$
|
2.40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of or for the Fiscal Years Ended March
|
|
|
|
29, 2008
|
|
|
31, 2007
|
|
|
25, 2006
|
|
|
26, 2005
|
|
|
27, 2004
|
|
|
Balance Sheets and Working Capital Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory, net
|
|
$
|
5,442
|
|
|
$
|
4,336
|
|
|
$
|
3,952
|
|
|
$
|
5,952
|
|
|
$
|
3,736
|
|
Property and Equipment, net
|
|
|
3,211
|
|
|
|
2,814
|
|
|
|
2,637
|
|
|
|
1,984
|
|
|
|
2,025
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
2,967
|
|
|
|
2,967
|
|
|
|
2,967
|
|
|
|
2,524
|
|
|
|
2,524
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
|
24,344
|
|
|
|
22,422
|
|
|
|
21,488
|
|
|
|
20,207
|
|
|
|
18,385
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization
|
|
|
1,761
|
|
|
|
1,622
|
|
|
|
1,401
|
|
|
|
1,486
|
|
|
|
1,299
|
|
Capital Expenditures
|
|
|
1,505
|
|
|
|
1,194
|
|
|
|
914
|
|
|
|
866
|
|
|
|
459
|
|
Revolving Line of Credit
|
|
|
302
|
|
|
|
2,900
|
|
|
|
3,252
|
|
|
|
5,498
|
|
|
|
6,441
|
|
Term Loan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,020
|
|
|
|
1,778
|
|
|
|
668
|
|
Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
15,117
|
|
|
|
11,229
|
|
|
|
8,647
|
|
|
|
4,314
|
|
|
|
3,428
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In fiscal year 2007, we recognized a previously deferred pre-tax
gain of $1.5 million from the sale of TPG to Fluke. See
Note 9 of the Consolidated Financial Statements for further
information. |
17
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
RECLASSIFICATION
OF AMOUNTS
Certain reclassifications of financial information for prior
fiscal years have been made to conform to the presentation for
the current fiscal year. In addition, certain reclassifications
of financial information for prior fiscal quarters have been
made to conform to the presentation for the current fiscal
quarters.
OVERVIEW
Operational Overview. We are a leading
distributor of professional grade test and measurement
instruments and provider of nationally recognized and accredited
calibration,
3-D
metrology and repair services across a wide array of measurement
disciplines.
We operate our business through two reportable business segments
that offer different products and services to the same customer
base. Those two segments are distribution products and
calibration services.
In our Product segment, our Master Catalog is widely recognized
by both original equipment manufacturers and customers as the
ultimate source for test and measurement instruments.
Additionally, because we specialize in test and measurement
instruments, as opposed to a wide array of industrial products,
our sales and customer service personnel can provide value added
technical assistance to our customers to assist them in
determining what product best meets their particular application
requirements.
Sales in our Product segment can be heavily impacted by changes
in the economic environment. As industrial customers increase or
curtail capital and discretionary spending, our product sales
will typically be directly impacted. The majority of our
products are not consumables, but are purchased as replacements,
upgrades, or for expansion of manufacturing and research and
development facilities. Year over year sales growth in any one
quarter can be impacted by a number of factors including the
addition of new product lines or channels of distribution.
Our strength in our Service segment is based upon our wide range
of disciplines and our investment in the quality systems that
are required in our targeted market segments. Our services range
from the calibration and repair of a single unit to managing a
customers entire calibration program. We believe our
Service segment offers an opportunity for long term growth and
the potential for continuing revenue from established customers
with regular calibration cycles.
We evaluate revenue growth in both of our business segments
against a four quarter trend analysis, and not by analyzing any
single quarter.
Financial Overview. In evaluating our
results for fiscal year 2008, the following factors should be
taken into account:
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year 2008 and fiscal year 2006 operating results include
52 weeks compared with 53 weeks for fiscal year 2007.
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year 2008 net income includes a $0.8 million
reversal of a deferred tax asset valuation allowance. We
reversed the allowance after an evaluation of the status of our
foreign tax credits and the likelihood that these credits would
be utilized prior to their expiration.
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year 2007 operating results included a $1.5 million
pre-tax gain from the sale of Transmation Products Group
(TPG), which had been deferred since fiscal 2002.
Net of income taxes, the impact of this previously deferred gain
on fiscal year 2007 net income was approximately
$0.9 million.
|
Net revenue for fiscal year 2008 was $70.5 million, a 6.0%
increase compared with revenue of $66.5 million for fiscal
year 2007. Product segment sales increased 4.7% to
$47.5 million, or 67.5% of total revenue, in fiscal year
2008. Approximately 85% of Product segment sales in fiscal year
2008 were sold directly to end-user customers while 14% were to
resellers compared with 82% and 16%, respectively, in fiscal
year 2007. During fiscal year 2008, we reduced promotional
discounts to resellers in order to improve the gross margin of
18
the Product segment. Domestic sales comprised approximately 77%
of the total Product segment sales in fiscal year 2008, while 9%
were to Canada and 11% were to other international markets.
Service segment revenue increased 8.8% to $22.9 million, or
32.5% of total net revenue, in year fiscal 2008. For fiscal year
2008, 80% of Service segment revenue was generated by our
Calibration Centers of Excellence and 18% of Service segment
revenue was generated through subcontracted outside vendors,
while fiscal year 2007 Service segment revenue was 82% and 17%,
respectively.
Gross margin for fiscal year 2008 was 26.3%, a 130 basis
point improvement compared with gross margin of 25.0% in fiscal
year 2007, and was primarily impacted by higher margins on lower
product sales to resellers and the increase in incremental
margin on Service segment revenue. Product segment gross margin
was 27.8% in fiscal year 2008 compared with 26.4% in fiscal year
2007, while Service segment gross margin improved to 23.3% in
fiscal year 2008 compared with 21.9% in fiscal year 2007.
Operating expenses were $15.3 million, or 21.7% of revenue,
in fiscal year 2008 compared with $14.3 million, or 21.4%
of revenue, in fiscal year 2007. Operating income was
$3.3 million for fiscal year 2008 compared with
$3.9 million in fiscal year 2007, which included the
recognition of a previously deferred $1.5 million pre-tax
gain on the sale of TPG.
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Financial Reporting Release No. 60 requires all companies
to include a discussion of critical accounting principles or
methods used in the preparation of financial statements.
Note 1 of our Consolidated Financial Statements includes a
complete discussion of the significant accounting policies and
methods used in the preparation of our Consolidated Financial
Statements. A summary of our most critical accounting policies
follows:
Use of Estimates. The preparation of
our Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
requires that we make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and the disclosure
of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the
financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates and
assumptions are used for, but not limited to, allowance for
doubtful accounts and returns, depreciable lives of fixed
assets, estimated lives of our Master Catalog, and deferred tax
asset valuation allowances. Future events and their effects
cannot be predicted with certainty; accordingly, our accounting
estimates require the exercise of judgment. The accounting
estimates used in the preparation of our Consolidated Financial
Statements will change as new events occur, as more experience
is acquired, as additional information is obtained, and as our
operating environment changes. Actual results could differ from
those estimates. Such changes and refinements in estimation
methodologies are reflected in reported results of operations in
the period in which the changes are made and, if material, their
effects are disclosed in the Notes to our Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Accounts Receivable. Accounts
receivable represent receivables from customers in the ordinary
course of business. These amounts are recorded net of the
allowance for doubtful accounts and returns in the Consolidated
Balance Sheets. The allowance for doubtful accounts is based
upon the expected collectibility of accounts receivable. We
apply a specific formula to our accounts receivable aging, which
may be adjusted on a specific account basis where the formula
may not appropriately reserve for loss exposure. After all
attempts to collect a receivable have failed, the receivable is
written-off against the allowance for doubtful accounts. The
returns reserve is calculated based upon the historical rate of
returns applied to revenues over a specific timeframe. The
returns reserve will increase or decrease as a result of changes
in the level of revenues
and/or the
historical rate of returns.
Inventory. Inventory consists of
products purchased for resale and is valued at the lower of cost
or market. Costs are determined using the average cost method of
inventory valuation. Inventory is reduced by a reserve for items
not saleable at or above cost by applying a specific loss
factor, based on historical experience, to specific categories
of our inventory. We evaluate the adequacy of the reserve on a
quarterly basis.
19
Property and Equipment, Depreciation, and
Amortization. Property and equipment are
stated at cost. Depreciation and amortization are computed
primarily under the straight-line method over the following
estimated useful lives:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Machinery, Equipment, and Software
|
|
|
2 - 6
|
|
Furniture and Fixtures
|
|
|
3 - 10
|
|
Leasehold Improvements
|
|
|
4 - 10
|
|
Property and equipment determined to have no value are written
off at their then remaining net book value. We account for
software costs in accordance with Statement of Position
No. 98-1,
Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or
Obtained for Internal Use. Leasehold improvements are amortized
under the straight-line method over the estimated useful life or
the lease term, whichever is shorter. Maintenance and repairs
are expensed as incurred. See Note 2 of our Consolidated
Financial Statements for further information.
Goodwill. We estimate the fair value of
our reporting units in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142, Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets, using the fair market value
measurement requirement, rather than the undiscounted cash flows
approach. We test our goodwill for impairment on an annual
basis, or immediately if conditions indicate that such
impairment could exist. The evaluation of our reporting units on
a fair value basis indicated that no impairment existed as of
March 29, 2008, March 31, 2007 and March 25, 2006.
Catalog Costs. We capitalize the cost
of each Master Catalog mailed and amortize the cost over the
respective catalogs estimated productive life. We review
response results from catalog mailings on a continuous basis;
and if warranted, modify the period over which costs are
recognized. We amortize the cost of each Master Catalog over an
eighteen month period and amortize the cost of each catalog
supplement over a three month period. Total unamortized catalog
costs in prepaid expenses and other current assets on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets were $0.4 million and
$0.5 million as of March 29, 2008 and March 31,
2007, respectively.
Deferred Taxes. We account for certain
income and expense items differently for financial reporting
purposes than for income tax reporting purposes. Deferred taxes
are provided in recognition of these temporary differences. A
valuation allowance on deferred tax assets is provided for items
for which it is more likely than not that the benefit of such
items will not be realized, in accordance with the provisions of
SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes.
SFAS No. 109 requires an assessment of both positive
and negative evidence when measuring the need for a deferred tax
valuation allowance. See Taxes below in this section
and Note 4 of our Consolidated Financial Statements for
further details.
Stock-Based Compensation. In accordance
with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123
(revised 2004), Share-Based Payment
(SFAS 123R), we measure the cost of services
received in exchange for all equity awards granted, including
stock options, warrants and restricted stock, based on the fair
market value of the award as of the grant date. We use the
modified prospective application method to record compensation
cost related to unvested stock awards as of March 25, 2006
by recognizing the unamortized grant date fair value of these
awards over the remaining service periods of those awards with
no change in historical reported earnings. Awards granted after
March 25, 2006 are valued at fair value and are recognized
on a straight line basis over the service periods of each award.
Excess tax benefits from the exercise of stock awards are
presented in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows as a
financing activity. Excess tax benefits are realized benefits
from tax deductions for exercised awards in excess of the
deferred tax asset attributable to stock-based compensation
costs for such awards. We did not have any stock-based
compensation costs capitalized as part of an asset. We estimate
forfeiture rates based on our historical experience.
Options generally vest ratably over a period of up to four years
and expire up to ten years from the date of grant. Beginning in
the second quarter of fiscal year 2008, options granted to
executive officers vest using a graded schedule of 0% in the
first year, 20% in each of the second and third years, and 60%
in the fourth year. Prior options granted to executive officers
vested ratably over three years. The expense relating to these
20
executive officer options is recognized on a straight-line basis
over the requisite service period for the entire award.
Prior to fiscal year 2007, we accounted for stock-based
compensation in accordance with Accounting Principles Board
Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,
using the intrinsic value method, which did not require that
compensation cost be recognized for our stock awards provided
the exercise price was equal to or greater than the common stock
fair market value on the date of grant. Prior to fiscal year
2007, we provided pro forma disclosure amounts in accordance
with SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation Transition and Disclosure, as if the
fair value method had been applied to its stock-based
compensation. Our net income and net income per share for fiscal
year 2006 would have been reduced if compensation cost related
to stock awards had been recorded in the financial statements
based on fair value at the grant dates.
See Note 7 of our Consolidated Financial Statements for
further disclosure regarding our stock-based compensation.
Revenue Recognition. Product sales are
recorded when a products title and risk of loss transfers
to the customer. We recognize the majority of our service
revenue based upon when the calibration or repair activity is
performed and then shipped
and/or
delivered to the customer. Some of our service revenue is
generated from managing customers calibration programs in
which we recognize revenue in equal amounts at fixed intervals.
We generally invoice our customers for freight, shipping, and
handling charges. Our prices are fixed and determinable,
collection of the resulting receivable is probable, and returns
are reasonably estimated. Provisions for customer returns are
provided for in the period the related revenues are recorded
based upon historical data.
Gain on TPG Divestiture. During the
fiscal year ended March 31, 2002, we sold TPG. As a result
of certain post closing commitments, we deferred recognition of
a $1.5 million pre-tax gain on the sale. During fiscal year
2007, we satisfied those commitments and consequently realized
the gain as a component of operating income in our Consolidated
Financial Statements. See Note 9 of our Consolidated
Financial Statements for further discussion on the TPG
Divestiture.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements. We do
not maintain any off-balance sheet arrangements.
21
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
The following table sets forth, for the prior three fiscal
years, the components of our Consolidated Statements of
Operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2008
|
|
|
FY 2007
|
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
|
Gross Profit Percentage:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Gross Profit
|
|
|
27.8
|
%
|
|
|
26.4
|
%
|
|
|
24.0
|
%
|
Service Gross Profit
|
|
|
23.3
|
%
|
|
|
21.9
|
%
|
|
|
26.9
|
%
|
Total Gross Profit
|
|
|
26.3
|
%
|
|
|
25.0
|
%
|
|
|
25.0
|
%
|
As a Percentage of Total Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Sales
|
|
|
67.5
|
%
|
|
|
68.3
|
%
|
|
|
67.5
|
%
|
Service Revenue
|
|
|
32.5
|
%
|
|
|
31.7
|
%
|
|
|
32.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenue
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, Marketing and Warehouse Expenses
|
|
|
12.9
|
%
|
|
|
13.2
|
%
|
|
|
14.6
|
%
|
Administrative Expenses
|
|
|
8.8
|
%
|
|
|
8.2
|
%
|
|
|
7.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Expenses
|
|
|
21.7
|
%
|
|
|
21.4
|
%
|
|
|
22.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on TPG Divestiture
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
Other Expense
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Other Expense
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Before Income Taxes
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
|
|
4.9
|
%
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
Provision for (benefit from) Income Taxes
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
|
(4.4
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
|
5.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FISCAL
YEAR ENDED MARCH 29, 2008 COMPARED TO FISCAL YEAR ENDED MARCH
31, 2007
(dollars
in thousands):
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For The Years Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 29,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
$
|
47,539
|
|
|
$
|
45,411
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service
|
|
|
22,914
|
|
|
|
21,062
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
70,453
|
|
|
$
|
66,473
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue increased $4.0 million, or 6.0%, from fiscal
year 2007 to fiscal year 2008.
Our distribution products net sales accounted for 67.5% of our
total net revenue in fiscal year 2008 and 68.3% of our total net
revenue in fiscal year 2007. On an annual basis, product net
sales increased 4.7% despite having 52 weeks in fiscal year
2008 compared to 53 weeks in fiscal year 2007. This
reduction of one fiscal week, which occurred in our fiscal
fourth quarter, was the key driver of the 2.4% decrease in sales
from our fiscal 2007 fourth quarter to our fiscal 2008 fourth
quarter. Our fiscal years 2008 and 2007 product sales in
relation to prior fiscal year quarter comparisons, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2008
|
|
|
|
FY 2007
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
|
Q4(1)
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
Product Sales (Decline) Growth
|
|
|
(2.4
|
)%
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
|
|
13.6
|
%
|
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
20.7
|
%
|
|
|
6.9
|
%
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
|
12.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The fourth quarter of fiscal year 2007 was a 14-week period. All
other quarters are 13-week periods. |
22
Despite the decrease in distribution product net sales from our
fiscal 2007 fourth quarter to our fiscal 2008 fourth quarter,
our distribution product net sales volume per business day
increased 5.3% for the same time period and 7.2% on an annual
basis. Our product sales per business day for each fiscal
quarter during fiscal years 2008 and 2007, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2008
|
|
|
|
FY 2007
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
Product Sales Per Business Day
|
|
$
|
197
|
|
|
$
|
213
|
|
|
$
|
178
|
|
|
$
|
171
|
|
|
|
$
|
187
|
|
|
$
|
195
|
|
|
$
|
159
|
|
|
$
|
165
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overall product sales from fiscal year 2007 to fiscal year 2008
reflect an 8.0% year-over-year growth in our direct distribution
channel. This growth was a result of a combination of increased
prices, new product introductions by strategic suppliers,
increased customer response to our sales and marketing efforts
and growing sales through our website. Our direct distribution
channel gross profit percentage increased 0.5 points as a result
of reduced discounting. For the same time period, our reseller
channel experienced a 10.4% increase in gross profit despite a
sales decrease of 11.9%. Sales within this channel are driven by
volume-based pricing for each reseller. During fiscal year 2008,
we adjusted our channel pricing structure, which generated a 3.5
point increase in gross profit percentage for our resellers and
a 2.6 point decline in reseller sales as a percent of total
product sales. The following table provides the percent of net
sales and approximate gross profit percentage for significant
product distribution channels:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2008
|
|
|
|
FY 2007
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
|
Profit %(1)
|
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
|
Profit %(1)
|
|
Direct
|
|
|
84.8
|
%
|
|
|
26.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
82.2
|
%
|
|
|
25.7
|
%
|
Reseller
|
|
|
13.7
|
%
|
|
|
17.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
16.3
|
%
|
|
|
13.5
|
%
|
Freight Billed to Customers
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Calculated at net sales less purchase costs divided by net sales. |
Customer product orders include orders for products that we
routinely stock in our inventory, customized products, and other
products ordered less frequently, which we do not stock. Pending
product shipments are primarily backorders, but also include
products that are requested to be calibrated in our calibration
laboratories prior to shipment, orders required to be shipped
complete, and orders required to be shipped at a future date.
Our total pending product shipments for fiscal year 2008
decreased by approximately $0.4 million, or 21.8% from
fiscal year 2007. Fiscal year 2007 year-end backorders
included a $0.4 million remaining balance on a single large
product order that was placed by a customer during our fiscal
2007 second quarter, but was shipped across multiple months
based on an agreed upon delivery schedule with that customer.
The following table reflects the percentage of total pending
product shipments that are backorders at the end of each fiscal
quarter and our historical trend of total pending product
shipments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2008
|
|
|
|
FY 2007
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
Total Pending Product Shipments
|
|
$
|
1,419
|
|
|
$
|
1,411
|
|
|
$
|
1,689
|
|
|
$
|
1,678
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,814
|
|
|
$
|
2,100
|
|
|
$
|
2,125
|
|
|
$
|
1,404
|
|
% of Pending Product Shipments that are Backorders
|
|
|
81.5
|
%
|
|
|
78.1
|
%
|
|
|
74.1
|
%
|
|
|
81.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
89.5
|
%
|
|
|
92.2
|
%
|
|
|
89.7
|
%
|
|
|
80.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calibration services revenue, which accounted for 32.5% of our
revenue in fiscal year 2008 and 31.7% of our revenue in fiscal
year 2007, increased 8.8% from fiscal year 2007 to fiscal year
2008. We believe changes made in our sales structure implemented
in late fiscal year 2007 and progressing throughout fiscal year
2008, for both existing account management and new customer
acquisition, helped drive this growth. In addition, within any
year, while we may add new customers, we may also have customers
from the prior year whose calibrations may not repeat for any
number of factors. Among those factors are the variations in the
timing of
23
customer periodic calibrations on instruments and repair
services, customer capital expenditures and customer outsourcing
decisions. Our fiscal years 2008 and 2007 calibration service
revenue in relation to prior fiscal year quarter comparisons,
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2008
|
|
|
|
FY 2007
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
|
Q4(1)
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
Service Revenue Growth
|
|
|
10.6
|
%
|
|
|
9.9
|
%
|
|
|
8.6
|
%
|
|
|
5.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
11.2
|
%
|
|
|
4.5
|
%
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
|
|
6.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The fourth quarter of fiscal year 2007 was a 14-week period. All
other quarters are 13-week periods. |
Within the calibration industry, there is a broad array of
measurement disciplines making it costly and inefficient for any
one provider to invest the needed capital for facilities,
equipment and uniquely trained personnel necessary to perform
all calibrations in-house. Our strategy has been to focus our
investments in the core electrical, temperature, pressure and
dimensional disciplines. Accordingly, in servicing our
customers calibration needs, we have historically
subcontracted to outside vendors, including those with unique or
proprietary capabilities, 15% to 20% of the instruments we
receive from customers for calibration. The following table
provides Service segment revenue and the percent of Service
segment revenue for fiscal years 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2008
|
|
|
|
FY 2007
|
|
|
|
Service
|
|
|
% of Service
|
|
|
|
Service
|
|
|
% of Service
|
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
Depot
|
|
$
|
14,384
|
|
|
|
62.8
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
13,393
|
|
|
|
63.6
|
%
|
On-site
|
|
|
3,852
|
|
|
|
16.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
3,598
|
|
|
|
17.1
|
%
|
Outsourced
|
|
|
4,078
|
|
|
|
17.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
3,536
|
|
|
|
16.8
|
%
|
Freight Billed to Customers
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
535
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
22,914
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
21,062
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
Profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 29,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Gross Profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
$
|
13,205
|
|
|
$
|
11,992
|
|
Service
|
|
|
5,336
|
|
|
|
4,621
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
18,541
|
|
|
$
|
16,613
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit, as a percent of net revenue, increased from 25.0%
in fiscal year 2007 to 26.3% in fiscal year 2008.
Distribution products gross profit increased $1.2 million,
or 10.1%, from fiscal year 2007 to fiscal year 2008, primarily
because of a 4.7% increase in net sales. As a percent of net
revenue, product gross profit increased 140 basis points
from fiscal year 2007 to fiscal year 2008. This is primarily
attributable to an increased mix of sales through more
profitable sales channels, improved pricing programs, and over
$0.2 million more in cooperative advertising income
received in fiscal year 2008 as compared to fiscal year 2007.
Our product gross profit may be influenced by a number of
factors that can impact quarterly comparisons. Among those
factors are sales to our reseller channel which have lower
margins than our direct customer base,
24
periodic rebates on purchases, and cooperative advertising
received from suppliers. The following table reflects the
quarterly historical trend of our product gross profit as a
percent of net revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2008
|
|
|
|
FY 2007
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
Product Gross Profit%(1)
|
|
|
24.1
|
%
|
|
|
25.1
|
%
|
|
|
25.8
|
%
|
|
|
24.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
24.4
|
%
|
|
|
24.0
|
%
|
|
|
23.7
|
%
|
|
|
22.4
|
%
|
Other Income%(2)
|
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
%
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
|
3.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Gross Profit%
|
|
|
27.1
|
%
|
|
|
28.1
|
%
|
|
|
27.9
|
%
|
|
|
28.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
27.2
|
%
|
|
|
27.4
|
%
|
|
|
24.9
|
%
|
|
|
25.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Calculated as net sales less purchase costs divided by net sales. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes vendor rebates, cooperative advertising income, freight
billed to customers, freight expenses, and direct shipping costs. |
Calibration services gross profit increased $0.7 million,
or 15.5%, from fiscal year 2007 to fiscal year 2008. During
fiscal year 2008, our service revenue grew at a faster rate than
our service expenses, thus leveraging investments made in our
calibration capabilities in previous years. As a percent of net
revenue, calibration services gross profit increased
140 basis points from fiscal year 2007 to fiscal year 2008,
due to the aforementioned leverage gained from prior investments
in calibration services capacity. The following table reflects
our calibration services gross profit growth in relation to
prior fiscal year quarters:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2008
|
|
|
|
FY 2007
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
|
Q4(1)
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
Service Gross Profit Dollar Growth
|
|
|
32.5
|
%
|
|
|
14.0
|
%
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
(5.8
|
)%
|
|
|
(12.3
|
)%
|
|
|
(17.2
|
)%
|
|
|
(16.6
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The fourth quarter of fiscal year 2007 was a 14-week period. All
other quarters are 13-week periods. |
Operating
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 29,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Operating Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, Marketing and Warehouse
|
|
$
|
9,056
|
|
|
$
|
8,790
|
|
Administrative
|
|
|
6,202
|
|
|
|
5,474
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
15,258
|
|
|
$
|
14,264
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses increased $1.0 million, or 7.0%, from
fiscal year 2007 to fiscal year 2008. Selling, marketing and
warehouse expenses increased $0.3 million, but decreased as
a percentage of net revenue from 13.2% in fiscal year 2007 to
12.9% in fiscal year 2008. This was primarily driven by
increased expenses associated with print marketing initiatives
and our website, partially offset by reductions due to changes
made within our sales organization. Administrative expenses
increased $0.7 million from fiscal year 2007 to fiscal year
2008 and increased as a percent of net revenue from 8.2% in
fiscal year 2007 to 8.8% in fiscal year 2008. This was due
primarily to increases in stock-based compensation expense
resulting from an increase in the per share value of awards
granted, professional fees and employee-related expenses.
Gain
on TPG Divestiture:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 29,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Gain on TPG Divestiture
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,544
|
|
The one-time gain in fiscal year 2007 represents the recognition
of a previously deferred gain on the sale of TPG. Although the
sale of TPG occurred in fiscal year 2002, we were precluded from
recognizing the gain at
25
that time because we had entered into a distribution agreement
in connection with the transaction that required us to purchase
a pre-determined amount of inventory during each calendar year
from 2002 to 2006. In December 2006, our purchases exceeded the
required amount for 2006, as they had in each of the prior four
years, which fulfilled our contractual purchase obligations
under the distribution agreement and triggered the recognition
of the gain in the third quarter of fiscal year 2007.
Other
Expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 29,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Other Expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
$
|
101
|
|
|
$
|
334
|
|
Other Expense, net
|
|
|
437
|
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
538
|
|
|
$
|
617
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense decreased $0.2 million from fiscal year
2007 to fiscal year 2008 due to declining debt balances. Other
expense increased $0.2 million from fiscal year 2007 to
fiscal year 2008, primarily due to an increase in foreign
currency losses resulting from a decline in the U.S. dollar
compared with the Canadian dollar in fiscal year 2008.
Taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 29,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Provision for Income Taxes
|
|
$
|
382
|
|
|
$
|
1,217
|
|
In fiscal year 2008, we recognized a $0.4 million provision
for income taxes, compared with a $1.2 million provision in
fiscal year 2007. Fiscal year 2008 included a $0.8 million
benefit from a reduction in our deferred tax asset valuation
allowance relating to our U.S. foreign tax credit
carryforwards, and fiscal year 2007 included a $0.6 million
provision for income tax relating to the recognition of a
previously deferred gain on the sale of TPG.
FISCAL
YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 2007 COMPARED TO FISCAL YEAR ENDED MARCH
25, 2006
(dollars
in thousands):
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 25,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Net Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
$
|
45,411
|
|
|
$
|
40,814
|
|
Service
|
|
|
21,062
|
|
|
|
19,657
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
66,473
|
|
|
$
|
60,471
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue increased $6.0 million, or 9.9%, from
fiscal year 2006 to fiscal year 2007.
Our distribution products net sales growth, which accounted for
68.3% of our total net revenue in fiscal year 2007 and 67.5% of
our total net revenue in fiscal year 2006, reflects customer
response to our sales and
26
marketing activities and an additional weeks worth of
shipments. Our fiscal years 2007 and 2006 product sales in
relation to prior fiscal year quarter comparisons, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2007
|
|
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
|
|
Q4(1)
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
Product Sales Growth
|
|
|
20.7
|
%
|
|
|
6.9
|
%
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
|
12.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
|
|
16.7
|
%
|
|
|
13.3
|
%
|
|
|
5.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The fourth quarter of fiscal year 2007 was a 14-week period. All
other quarters are 13-week periods. |
We experienced distribution products net sales growth in both
our direct and reseller channels in fiscal year 2007 compared
with fiscal year 2006. The growth in our reseller channel,
primarily from high-volume electrical and instrumentation
wholesalers, caused a shift in our mix by distribution channel.
The following table provides the percent of net sales and
approximate gross profit percentage for significant product
distribution channels:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2007
|
|
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
|
Profit %(1)
|
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
|
Profit %(1)
|
|
Direct
|
|
|
82.2
|
%
|
|
|
25.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
84.9
|
%
|
|
|
24.7
|
%
|
Reseller
|
|
|
16.3
|
%
|
|
|
13.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
13.6
|
%
|
|
|
13.5
|
%
|
Freight Billed to Customers
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Calculated at net sales less purchase costs divided by net sales. |
Customer product orders include orders for products that we
routinely stock in our inventory, customized products, and other
products ordered less frequently, which we do not stock. Pending
product shipments are primarily backorders, but also include
products that are requested to be calibrated in our calibration
laboratories prior to shipment, orders required to be shipped
complete, and orders required to be shipped at a future date.
Our total pending product shipments for fiscal year 2007
increased by approximately $0.4 million, or 27.7%, from
fiscal year 2006. This was mainly the result of a single, large
product order that was placed by a customer during our fiscal
2007 second quarter, but was shipped across multiple months
based on an agreed upon delivery schedule with that customer. As
of March 31, 2007, the remaining balance to be shipped on
this order was $0.4 million. The following table reflects
the percentage of total pending product shipments that are
backorders at the end of each fiscal quarter and our historical
trend of total pending product shipments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2007
|
|
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
Total Pending Product Shipments
|
|
$
|
1,814
|
|
|
$
|
2,100
|
|
|
$
|
2,125
|
|
|
$
|
1,404
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,420
|
|
|
$
|
1,307
|
|
|
$
|
1,492
|
|
|
$
|
1,329
|
|
% of Pending Product Shipments that are Backorders
|
|
|
89.5
|
%
|
|
|
92.2
|
%
|
|
|
89.7
|
%
|
|
|
80.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
88.9
|
%
|
|
|
87.8
|
%
|
|
|
72.1
|
%
|
|
|
78.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calibration services revenue increased $1.4 million, or
7.1%, from fiscal year 2006 to fiscal year 2007. This increase
is primarily attributable to incremental revenue as a result of
our acquisition of NWCI during the fourth quarter of fiscal year
2006, increased order volume and an additional week in the
fourth quarter of fiscal year 2007. In addition, within any
year, while we may add new customers, we may also have customers
from the prior year whose calibrations may not repeat for any
number of factors. Among those factors are the variations in the
timing of customer periodic calibrations on instruments and
repair services, customer capital expenditures and customer
outsourcing decisions. Our fiscal years 2007 and 2006
calibration services revenue in relation to prior fiscal year
quarter comparisons, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2007
|
|
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
Service Revenue Growth
|
|
|
11.2
|
%
|
|
|
4.5
|
%
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
|
|
6.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
13.1
|
%
|
|
|
12.6
|
%
|
|
|
7.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
Gross
Profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 25,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Gross Profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
$
|
11,992
|
|
|
$
|
9,812
|
|
Service
|
|
|
4,621
|
|
|
|
5,287
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
16,613
|
|
|
$
|
15,099
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit, as a percent of total net revenue, was 25.0% in
both fiscal years 2006 and 2007.
Product gross profit increased $2.2 million from fiscal
year 2006 to fiscal year 2007, primarily attributable to the
11.3% increase in product net sales. As a percent of net sales,
product gross profit increased 2.4 points from fiscal year 2006
to fiscal year 2007. This percentage increase was primarily the
result of $0.7 million in additional vendor rebates and
$0.2 million in additional cooperative advertising received
from suppliers during fiscal year 2007 compared to fiscal year
2006.
Our product gross profit can be influenced by a number of
factors that can impact quarterly comparisons. Among those
factors are sales to our reseller channel which have lower
margins than our direct customer base, periodic rebates on
purchases, and cooperative advertising received from suppliers.
The following table reflects the quarterly historical trend of
our product gross profit as a percent of net sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2007
|
|
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
Product Gross Profit%(1)
|
|
|
24.4
|
%
|
|
|
24.0
|
%
|
|
|
23.7
|
%
|
|
|
22.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
23.0
|
%
|
|
|
23.6
|
%
|
|
|
23.0
|
%
|
|
|
22.9
|
%
|
Other Income%(2)
|
|
|
2.8
|
%
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
|
3.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Gross Profit%
|
|
|
27.2
|
%
|
|
|
27.4
|
%
|
|
|
24.9
|
%
|
|
|
25.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
23.1
|
%
|
|
|
24.3
|
%
|
|
|
24.7
|
%
|
|
|
24.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Calculated at net sales less purchase costs divided by net sales. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes vendor rebates, cooperative advertising income, freight
billed to customers, freight expenses, and direct shipping costs. |
Calibration services gross profit decreased $0.7 million
from fiscal year 2006 to fiscal year 2007. During fiscal year
2007, our continued investment in our calibration capabilities
grew at a faster rate than our calibration service revenue. As a
percent of net revenue, calibration services gross profit
decreased 5.0 points from fiscal year 2006 to fiscal year 2007,
primarily due to investment in calibration services capacity
including people, equipment and space. The following table
reflects the quarterly historical trend of our calibration
services gross profit as a percent of net revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2007
|
|
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
Service Gross Profit%
|
|
|
24.5
|
%
|
|
|
18.8
|
%
|
|
|
21.3
|
%
|
|
|
22.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
28.9
|
%
|
|
|
22.4
|
%
|
|
|
27.3
|
%
|
|
|
28.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 25,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Operating Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, Marketing and Warehouse
|
|
$
|
8,790
|
|
|
$
|
8,802
|
|
Administrative
|
|
|
5,474
|
|
|
|
4,779
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
14,264
|
|
|
$
|
13,581
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
Operating expenses increased $0.7 million, or 5.0%, from
fiscal year 2006 to fiscal year 2007. Selling, marketing and
warehouse expenses were consistent from fiscal year 2006 to
fiscal year 2007. Administrative expenses increased
$0.7 million from fiscal year 2006 to fiscal year 2007 and
increased as a percent of total net revenue from 7.9% in fiscal
year 2006 to 8.2% in fiscal year 2007. Administrative expenses
included $0.2 million in stock expense associated with our
adoption of SFAS 123R in fiscal year 2007, which
contributed to this increase. The balance of the increase was
primarily due to employee-related expenses and benefits.
Gain
on TPG Divestiture:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 25,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Gain on TPG Divestiture
|
|
$
|
1,544
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
This one-time gain represents the recognition of a previously
deferred gain on the sale of TPG to Fluke. Although the sale of
TPG occurred in fiscal year 2002, we were precluded from
recognizing the gain at that time because we had entered into a
distribution agreement with Fluke in connection with the
transaction that required us to purchase a pre-determined amount
of inventory during each calendar year from 2002 to 2006. In
December 2006, our purchases exceeded the required amount for
calendar year 2006, as they had in each of the prior four years,
which fulfilled our contractual purchase obligations under the
distribution agreement and triggered the recognition of the gain
in the fiscal year 2007 third quarter.
Other
Expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 25,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Other Expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
$
|
334
|
|
|
$
|
427
|
|
Other Expense, net
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
617
|
|
|
$
|
589
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense decreased $0.1 million from fiscal year
2006 to fiscal year 2007 due to declining debt balances during
fiscal year 2007. Other expense increased $0.1 million from
fiscal year 2006 to fiscal year 2007, primarily attributable to
expenses incurred in connection with our debt refinancing which
occurred in the fiscal year 2007 third quarter.
Taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 25,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Provision for (Benefit from) Income Taxes
|
|
$
|
1,217
|
|
|
$
|
(2,648
|
)
|
In fiscal year 2007, we recognized a $1.2 million provision
for income taxes of which approximately $0.6 million
relates to taxes associated with the gain on the sale of TPG. In
the fiscal year 2006 fourth quarter, we reversed a significant
portion, $2.7 million, of our deferred tax valuation
reserve as a result of our income before taxes over the previous
four years and our expectation that our future performance will
result in sustained profitability and taxable income.
29
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash Flows. The following table is a
summary of our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 29,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Cash Provided by (Used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Activities
|
|
$
|
3,593
|
|
|
$
|
2,645
|
|
Investing Activities
|
|
|
(1,505
|
)
|
|
|
(1,194
|
)
|
Financing Activities
|
|
|
(2,246
|
)
|
|
|
(1,210
|
)
|
Operating Activities: Comparing fiscal year
2008 with fiscal year 2007, we experienced an approximate
$0.9 million increase in net cash provided by operating
activities. Significant working capital fluctuations were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories/Accounts Payable: We used
$1.0 million in cash to increase inventory in fiscal year
2008, compared to the $0.4 million used in fiscal year
2007, primarily due to our strategic initiative to increase the
immediate availability of new products recently introduced by
our suppliers.
|
|
|
|
An increase in Accounts Payable in fiscal year 2008 provided
$0.6 million in cash compared with $1.1 million in
cash provided in fiscal year 2007. In general, our accounts
payable balance increases or decreases as a result of the timing
of vendor payments for inventory receipts. The increase in both
inventory and accounts payable from March 31, 2007 to
March 29, 2008 resulted in a relatively consistent payables
to inventory ratio, as the following table illustrates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 29,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Accounts
Payable
|
|
$
|
5,947
|
|
|
$
|
5,307
|
|
Inventory,
net
|
|
$
|
5,442
|
|
|
$
|
4,336
|
|
Accounts
Payable/Inventory Ratio
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables: Our receivables increased
$0.5 million in fiscal year 2008 compared with fiscal year
2007. The increase in receivables is consistent with our
increase in total revenue.
|
|
|
|
As the following table illustrates, our days sales outstanding
was consistent from fiscal year 2007 to fiscal year 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 29,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Net
Sales, for the last two fiscal months
|
|
$
|
14,557
|
|
|
$
|
14,587
|
|
Accounts
Receivable, net
|
|
$
|
9,346
|
|
|
$
|
8,846
|
|
Days
Sales Outstanding
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
Investing Activities: The $1.5 million of
cash used in investing activities in fiscal year 2008 was
primarily used for: the expansion of our calibration
capabilities, including the expansion of our laboratory in
Rochester, New York and equipment for our new laboratory in
Anaheim, California, and for the replacement of laboratory
equipment. The $1.2 million of cash used in investing
activities in fiscal year 2007 resulted from expenditures for
our calibration laboratories, but also included
$0.2 million in improvements to our website.
Financing Activities: During fiscal year 2008,
we used $2.6 million of cash from operations to decrease
our overall debt. This use of cash was offset by
$0.4 million of cash generated primarily from the issuance
of common stock through the exercise of stock options and
warrants. The $1.2 million of cash used in financing
activities in fiscal year 2007 primarily resulted from
decreasing our overall debt. We were able to reduce our overall
debt by $1.4 million from cash provided by operating
activities. This $1.4 million use of cash was offset by
$0.2 million of cash received primarily from the exercise
of employee stock options.
30
Contractual Obligations and Commercial
Commitments. The table below contains
aggregated information about future payments related to
contractual obligations and commercial commitments such as debt
and lease agreements (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
1-3 Years
|
|
|
3-5 Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Revolving Line of Credit(1)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
Operating Leases(2)
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Contractual Cash Obligations
|
|
$
|
0.7
|
|
|
$
|
2.0
|
|
|
$
|
1.5
|
|
|
$
|
1.5
|
|
|
$
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Due to the uncertainty of forecasting expected variable rate
interest payments, this amount excludes interest portion of the
debt obligation. |
|
(2) |
|
Subsequent to March 29, 2008, we entered into an agreement
to extend the lease on our property in Rochester, NY. This
amount reflects the additional commitment totaling
$3.4 million over 10 years. |
Effect
of Recently Issued Accounting Standards.
SFAS 141R: In December 2007, the
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued
SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations
(SFAS 141R). This statement establishes
principles and requirements for how an acquirer in a business
combination recognizes and measures in its financial statements
the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and
any noncontrolling interest; recognizes and measures the
goodwill acquired in the business combination or a gain from a
bargain purchase; and determines what information to disclose to
enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature
and financial effects of the business combination.
SFAS 141R also requires acquisition-related transaction
expenses and restructuring costs be expensed as incurred rather
than capitalized as a component of the business combination.
SFAS 141R is to be applied prospectively to business
combinations beginning in our fiscal year ending March 27,
2010.
SFAS 157: In September 2006, FASB
issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements
(SFAS 157), which defines fair value,
establishes guidelines for measuring fair value and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 does
not require any new fair value measurements but rather
eliminates inconsistencies in guidance found in various prior
accounting pronouncements. SFAS 157 is effective for fiscal
years beginning after November 15, 2007, our fiscal year
ending March 28, 2009. In February 2008, the FASB issued
Financial Statement of Position
No. 157-2,
Partial Deferral of the Effective Date of Statement 157
(FSP 157-2).
FSP 157-2
delays the effective date of SFAS 157, for all nonfinancial
assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those that are
recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial
statements on a recurring basis (at least annually) to fiscal
years beginning after November 15, 2008. We are currently
evaluating the impact of SFAS 157, but do not expect the
adoption of SFAS 157 to have a material impact on our
Consolidated Financial Statements.
SFAS 160: In December 2007, the
FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements an amendment of
ARB No. 51 (SFAS 160). This statement
applies to the accounting for noncontrolling interests
(previously referred to as minority interest) in a subsidiary
and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. SFAS 160
requires noncontrolling interests to be reported as a component
of equity, which changes the accounting for transactions with
noncontrolling interest holders. SFAS 160 becomes effective
for us in the fiscal year ending March 27, 2010. Since we
do not currently have any noncontrolling interests, the adoption
of this statement is not expected to have an impact on our
Consolidated Financial Statements.
SFAS 161: In March 2008, the FASB
issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities (SFAS 161).
This statement is intended to improve financial reporting about
derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring
enhanced disclosures to enable investors to better understand
their effects on an entitys financial position, financial
performance, and cash flows. SFAS 161 is effective for
financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods
beginning after November 15, 2008. We are currently
evaluating the impact of adopting SFAS 161 on our
Consolidated Financial Statements.
31
OUTLOOK
Our efforts to build our calibration services business and
expand our margins have begun to show results. We expect that as
we continue to drive execution of our sales and marketing
strategy we should see continued revenue growth and expansion of
our profit margins on a year-over-year basis. We anticipate mid-
to upper- single digit growth of our Product segment sales in
the fiscal year ending March 28, 2009 (fiscal year
2009), which is reliant on successful new product
introductions by our suppliers, while we expect Service segment
sales will grow by 10% to 12%. As a result of the leverage
gained on incremental revenue from calibration services, we
expect operating income to grow at a faster rate than revenue.
Our goal is to be the recognized leader in providing premium
test and measurement instruments and quality calibration and
related services to the life science, manufacturing, utility and
process industries. As these industries continue to require
increased quality and control in their processes, we believe
that the value and convenience we provide, our product
application assistance and our exacting calibration standards
will enable us to capture greater market share.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
INTEREST
RATES
Our exposure to changes in interest rates results from borrowing
activities. In the event interest rates were to move by 1%, our
yearly interest expense would increase or decrease by less than
$0.1 million assuming our average-borrowing levels remained
constant. On March 29, 2008 and March 31, 2007, we had
no hedging arrangements in place to limit our exposure to upward
movements in interest rates.
Under our existing credit facility described in Note 3 of
our Consolidated Financial Statements, interest is adjusted on a
quarterly basis based upon our calculated leverage ratio. We
mitigate our interest rate risk by electing the lower of the
base rate available under the credit facility and the London
Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR). As of March 29,
2008, the base rate and the LIBOR rate were 5.3% and 2.7%,
respectively. Our interest rate for fiscal year 2008 ranged from
3.2% to 7.6%.
FOREIGN
CURRENCY
Approximately 90% of our net revenues for fiscal years 2008 and
2007 were denominated in United States dollars, with the
remainder denominated in Canadian dollars. A 10% change in the
value of the Canadian dollar to the United States dollar would
impact our net revenues by approximately 1%. We monitor the
relationship between the United States and Canadian currencies
on a continuous basis and adjust sales prices for products and
services sold in Canadian dollars as we believe to be
appropriate.
During the first half of fiscal year 2008, we incurred foreign
exchange losses of $0.3 million due to the decrease in
value of the United States dollar compared to the Canadian
dollar. During the third and fourth quarters of fiscal year
2008, we entered into foreign exchange forward contracts to
reduce any further risk that our earnings would be adversely
affected by changes in currency exchange rates. The contracts
were accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. We
did not apply hedge accounting and therefore, the change in the
fair value of the contracts, which totaled $0.2 million,
was recognized in current earnings as a component of other
expense in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. The change
in the fair value of the contracts was offset by the change in
fair value on the underlying intercompany assets and liabilities
being hedged. On March 29, 2008 and March 31, 2007,
there were no hedging arrangements outstanding. We do not use
hedging arrangements for speculative purposes.
32
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and Shareholders
Transcat, Inc.
Rochester, New York
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Transcat, Inc. and its subsidiaries as of March 29, 2008
and March 31, 2007 and the related consolidated statements
of operations and comprehensive income, shareholders
equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period
ended March 29, 2008. We have also audited the schedule
listed in the accompanying index for each of the three years in
the period ended March 29, 2008. These financial statements
and schedule are the responsibility of the Companys
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements and schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and
schedule are free of material misstatement. The Company is not
required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of
its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit
included consideration of internal control over financial
reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are
appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of
expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys
internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we
express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements and schedule, assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as
well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial
statements and schedule. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Transcat, Inc. and its subsidiaries at
March 29, 2008 and March 31, 2007, and the results of
their operations and their cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended March 29, 2008, in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States.
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial
statements, effective March 26, 2006, the Company adopted
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123
(revised 2004), Share-Based Payment.
Also, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule, when
considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial
statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all material
respects, the information set forth therein.
/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP
BDO Seidman, LLP
New York, New York
June 23, 2008
34
TRANSCAT,
INC.
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 29,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 25,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Product Sales
|
|
$
|
47,539
|
|
|
$
|
45,411
|
|
|
$
|
40,814
|
|
Service Revenue
|
|
|
22,914
|
|
|
|
21,062
|
|
|
|
19,657
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenue
|
|
|
70,453
|
|
|
|
66,473
|
|
|
|
60,471
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Products Sold
|
|
|
34,334
|
|
|
|
33,419
|
|
|
|
31,002
|
|
Cost of Services Sold
|
|
|
17,578
|
|
|
|
16,441
|
|
|
|
14,370
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Cost of Products and Services Sold
|
|
|
51,912
|
|
|
|
49,860
|
|
|
|
45,372
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit
|
|
|
18,541
|
|
|
|
16,613
|
|
|
|
15,099
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, Marketing and Warehouse Expenses
|
|
|
9,056
|
|
|
|
8,790
|
|
|
|
8,802
|
|
Administrative Expenses
|
|
|
6,202
|
|
|
|
5,474
|
|
|
|
4,779
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Expenses
|
|
|
15,258
|
|
|
|
14,264
|
|
|
|
13,581
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on TPG Divestiture
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,544
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income
|
|
|
3,283
|
|
|
|
3,893
|
|
|
|
1,518
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
334
|
|
|
|
427
|
|
Other Expense, net
|
|
|
437
|
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Other Expense
|
|
|
538
|
|
|
|
617
|
|
|
|
589
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Before Income Taxes
|
|
|
2,745
|
|
|
|
3,276
|
|
|
|
929
|
|
Provision for (Benefit from) Income Taxes
|
|
|
382
|
|
|
|
1,217
|
|
|
|
(2,648
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
2,363
|
|
|
|
2,059
|
|
|
|
3,577
|
|
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
|
|
|
393
|
|
|
|
(138
|
)
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income
|
|
$
|
2,756
|
|
|
$
|
1,921
|
|
|
$
|
3,662
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Earnings Per Share
|
|
$
|
0.33
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
$
|
0.54
|
|
Average Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
7,132
|
|
|
|
6,914
|
|
|
|
6,647
|
|
Diluted Earnings Per Share
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
$
|
0.50
|
|
Average Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
7,272
|
|
|
|
7,335
|
|
|
|
7,176
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
35
TRANSCAT,
INC.
(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 29,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
208
|
|
|
$
|
357
|
|
Accounts Receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $56
and $47 as of March 29, 2008 and March 31, 2007,
respectively
|
|
|
9,346
|
|
|
|
8,846
|
|
Other Receivables
|
|
|
370
|
|
|
|
352
|
|
Inventory, net
|
|
|
5,442
|
|
|
|
4,336
|
|
Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets
|
|
|
773
|
|
|
|
762
|
|
Deferred Tax Asset
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
851
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Assets
|
|
|
16,387
|
|
|
|
15,504
|
|
Property and Equipment, net
|
|
|
3,211
|
|
|
|
2,814
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
2,967
|
|
|
|
2,967
|
|
Deferred Tax Asset
|
|
|
1,435
|
|
|
|
791
|
|
Other Assets
|
|
|
344
|
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
24,344
|
|
|
$
|
22,422
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Payable
|
|
$
|
5,947
|
|
|
$
|
5,307
|
|
Accrued Compensation and Other Liabilities
|
|
|
2,489
|
|
|
|
2,578
|
|
Income Taxes Payable
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Liabilities
|
|
|
8,498
|
|
|
|
7,927
|
|
Long-Term Debt
|
|
|
302
|
|
|
|
2,900
|
|
Other Liabilities
|
|
|
427
|
|
|
|
366
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
|
9,227
|
|
|
|
11,193
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock, par value $0.50 per share, 30,000,000 shares
authorized; 7,446,223 and 7,286,119 shares issued as of
March 29, 2008 and March 31, 2007, respectively;
7,170,441 and 7,010,337 shares outstanding as of
March 29, 2008 and March 31, 2007, respectively
|
|
|
3,723
|
|
|
|
3,643
|
|
Capital in Excess of Par Value
|
|
|
6,649
|
|
|
|
5,268
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
329
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
|
|
|
436
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
Retained Earnings
|
|
|
5,297
|
|
|
|
2,934
|
|
Less: Treasury Stock, at cost, 275,782 shares as of
March 29, 2008 and March 31, 2007
|
|
|
(988
|
)
|
|
|
(988
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
15,117
|
|
|
|
11,229
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholders Equity
|
|
$
|
24,344
|
|
|
$
|
22,422
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
36
TRANSCAT,
INC.
(In Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 29,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 25,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
$
|
2,363
|
|
|
$
|
2,059
|
|
|
$
|
3,577
|
|
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Provided by
Operating Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Income Taxes
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
1,118
|
|
|
|
(2,662
|
)
|
Depreciation and Amortization
|
|
|
1,761
|
|
|
|
1,622
|
|
|
|
1,401
|
|
Provision for Accounts Receivable and Inventory Reserves
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
Stock-Based Compensation Expense
|
|
|
780
|
|
|
|
443
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
Gain on TPG Divestiture
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,544
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in Assets and Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Receivable and Other Receivables
|
|
|
(186
|
)
|
|
|
(1,270
|
)
|
|
|
499
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
(1,039
|
)
|
|
|
(421
|
)
|
|
|
1,994
|
|
Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets
|
|
|
(662
|
)
|
|
|
(547
|
)
|
|
|
(592
|
)
|
Accounts Payable
|
|
|
640
|
|
|
|
1,088
|
|
|
|
(325
|
)
|
Accrued Compensation and Other Liabilities
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
372
|
|
Income Taxes Payable
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
|
|
|
3,593
|
|
|
|
2,645
|
|
|
|
4,435
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Expenditures
|
|
|
(1,505
|
)
|
|
|
(1,194
|
)
|
|
|
(914
|
)
|
Purchase of N.W. Calibration Inspection, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(863
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
|
|
|
(1,505
|
)
|
|
|
(1,194
|
)
|
|
|
(1,777
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chase Revolving Line of Credit, net
|
|
|
(2,598
|
)
|
|
|
2,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMAC Revolving Line of Credit, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,252
|
)
|
|
|
(2,246
|
)
|
Payments on Other Debt Obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,076
|
)
|
|
|
(824
|
)
|
Issuance of Common Stock
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
416
|
|
Excess Tax Benefits Related to Stock-Based Compensation
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
|
|
|
(2,246
|
)
|
|
|
(1,210
|
)
|
|
|
(2,654
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (Decrease) Increase in Cash
|
|
|
(149
|
)
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Cash at Beginning of Period
|
|
|
357
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at End of Period
|
|
$
|
208
|
|
|
$
|
357
|
|
|
$
|
115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$
|
114
|
|
|
$
|
347
|
|
|
$
|
372
|
|
Income Taxes, net
|
|
$
|
253
|
|
|
$
|
158
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
Supplemental Disclosure of Non-Cash Financing Activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury Stock Acquired in Cashless Exercise of Stock Options
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
Expiration of Warrants from Debt Retirement
|
|
$
|
329
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
101
|
|
Stock Issued in Connection with Business Acquisition
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
37
TRANSCAT,
INC.
(In Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
In
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued
|
|
|
Excess
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$0.50 Par Value
|
|
|
of Par
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unearned
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
at Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
(Deficit)
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance as of March 26, 2005
|
|
|
6,700
|
|
|
$
|
3,350
|
|
|
$
|
3,995
|
|
|
$
|
430
|
|
|
$
|
(17
|
)
|
|
$
|
96
|
|
|
$
|
(2,702
|
)
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
$
|
(838
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,314
|
|
Issuance of Common Stock
|
|
|
314
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
474
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
581
|
|
Restricted Stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of Restricted Stock
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
Amortization of Unearned Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
Expired Warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
(101
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency Translation Adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,577
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,577
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 25, 2006
|
|
|
7,048
|
|
|
$
|
3,524
|
|
|
$
|
4,641
|
|
|
$
|
329
|
|
|
$
|
(15
|
)
|
|
$
|
181
|
|
|
$
|
875
|
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
$
|
(888
|
)
|
|
$
|
8,647
|
|
Issuance of Common Stock
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
218
|
|
Reversal of Unearned Compensation Upon Adoption of SFAS 123R
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-Based Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
337
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
337
|
|
Restricted Stock
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
Comprehensive Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency Translation Adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
Unrecognized Prior Service Cost, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(161
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(161
|
)
|
Net Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,059
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,059
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2007
|
|
|
7,286
|
|
|
$
|
3,643
|
|
|
$
|
5,268
|
|
|
$
|
329
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
|
$
|
2,934
|
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
$
|
(988
|
)
|
|
$
|
11,229
|
|
Issuance of Common Stock
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
Stock-Based Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
608
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
608
|
|
Excess Tax Benefit from Stock- Based Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
Restricted Stock
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
Expired Warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
(329
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency Translation Adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
385
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
385
|
|
Unrecognized Prior Service Cost, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,363
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,363
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2007
|
|
|
7,446
|
|
|
$
|
3,723
|
|
|
$
|
6,649
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
436
|
|
|
$
|
5,297
|
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
$
|
(988
|
)
|
|
$
|
15,117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
38
TRANSCAT,
INC.
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
Description of Business: Transcat, Inc.
(Transcat or the Company) is a leading
distributor of professional grade test and measurement
instruments and a provider of calibration,
3-D
metrology and repair services to the life science,
manufacturing, utility and process industries.
Principles of Consolidation: The Consolidated
Financial Statements of Transcat include the accounts of
Transcat, Inc. and the Companys wholly owned subsidiaries,
Transmation (Canada) Inc. and metersandinstruments.com, Inc.
(M&I). All significant intercompany balances
and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
During the fiscal year ended March 29, 2008 (fiscal
year 2008), the Company completed its dissolution and
liquidation of M&I. Accordingly, the accounts of M&I
have been absorbed by the Company. Since the subsidiary was
inactive, the dissolution had no effect on the Consolidated
Financial Statements.
Use of Estimates: The preparation of
Transcats Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States requires that the Company make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and
the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date
of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of
revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant
estimates and assumptions are used for, but not limited to,
allowance for doubtful accounts and returns, depreciable lives
of fixed assets, estimated lives of major catalogs, and deferred
tax asset valuation allowances. Future events and their effects
cannot be predicted with certainty; accordingly, accounting
estimates require the exercise of judgment. The accounting
estimates used in the preparation of the Consolidated Financial
Statements will change as new events occur, as more experience
is acquired, as additional information is obtained, and as the
operating environment changes. Actual results could differ from
those estimates. Such changes and refinements in estimation
methodologies are reflected in reported results of operations in
the period in which the changes are made and, if material, their
effects are disclosed in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Fiscal Year: Transcat operates on a
52/53 week fiscal year, ending the last Saturday in March.
In a 52-week fiscal year, each of the four quarters is a 13-week
period. In a 53-week fiscal year, the last quarter is a
14-week
period. Fiscal year 2008 consisted of 52 weeks, the fiscal
year ended March 31, 2007 (fiscal year 2007)
consisted of 53 weeks and the fiscal year ended
March 25, 2006 (fiscal year 2006) consisted of
52 weeks.
Accounts Receivable: Accounts receivable
represent receivables from customers in the ordinary course of
business. These amounts are recorded net of the allowance for
doubtful accounts and returns in the Consolidated Balance
Sheets. The allowance for doubtful accounts is based upon the
expected collectibility of accounts receivable. Transcat applies
a specific formula to its accounts receivable aging, which may
be adjusted on a specific account basis where the formula may
not appropriately reserve for loss exposure. After all attempts
to collect a receivable have failed, the receivable is
written-off against the allowance for doubtful accounts. The
returns reserve is calculated based upon the historical rate of
returns applied to revenues over a specific timeframe. The
returns reserve will increase or decrease as a result of changes
in the level of revenues
and/or the
historical rate of returns.
Inventory: Inventory consists of products
purchased for resale and is valued at the lower of cost or
market. Costs are determined using the average cost method of
inventory valuation. Inventory is reduced by a reserve for items
not saleable at or above cost by applying a specific loss
factor, based on historical experience, to specific categories
of inventory. The Company evaluates the adequacy of the reserve
on a quarterly basis.
39
Property and Equipment, Depreciation and
Amortization: Property and equipment are stated
at cost. Depreciation and amortization are computed primarily
under the straight-line method over the following estimated
useful lives:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Machinery, Equipment and Software
|
|
|
2 - 6
|
|
Furniture and Fixtures
|
|
|
3 - 10
|
|
Leasehold Improvements
|
|
|
4 - 10
|
|
Property and equipment determined to have no value are written
off at their then remaining net book value. Transcat accounts
for software costs in accordance with Statement of Position
No. 98-1,
Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or
Obtained for Internal Use. Leasehold improvements are amortized
under the straight-line method over the estimated useful life or
the lease term, whichever is shorter. Maintenance and repairs
are expensed as incurred. See Note 2 below for further
information on property and equipment.
Goodwill: Transcat estimates the fair value of
the Companys reporting units in accordance with Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)
No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, using the
fair market value measurement requirement, rather than the
undiscounted cash flows approach. The Company tests goodwill for
impairment on an annual basis, or immediately if conditions
indicate that such impairment could exist. The evaluation of the
Companys reporting units on a fair value basis indicated
that no impairment existed as of March 29, 2008,
March 31, 2007 and March 25, 2006.
Catalog Costs: Transcat capitalizes the cost
of each Master Catalog mailed and amortizes the cost over the
respective catalogs estimated productive life. The Company
reviews response results from catalog mailings on a continuous
basis, and if warranted, modifies the period over which costs
are recognized. The Company amortizes the cost of each Master
Catalog over an eighteen month period and amortizes the cost of
each catalog supplement over a three month period. Total
unamortized catalog costs in prepaid expenses and other current
assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets were $0.4 million
and $0.5 million as of March 29, 2008 and
March 31, 2007, respectively.
Deferred Taxes: Transcat accounts for certain
income and expense items differently for financial reporting
purposes than for income tax reporting purposes. Deferred taxes
are provided in recognition of these temporary differences. A
valuation allowance on net deferred tax assets is provided for
items for which it is more likely than not that the benefit of
such items will not be realized, in accordance with the
provisions of SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes (SFAS 109). SFAS 109 requires an
assessment of both positive and negative evidence when measuring
the need for a deferred tax valuation allowance. See Note 4
below for further discussion of SFAS 109.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments: Transcat
has determined the fair value of debt and other financial
instruments using available market information and appropriate
valuation methodologies. The carrying amount of debt on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets approximates fair value due to
variable interest rate pricing and the carrying amounts for
cash, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate fair
value, due to their short-term nature.
Stock-Based Compensation: In accordance with
SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment
(SFAS 123R), the Company measures the cost of
services received in exchange for all equity awards granted,
including stock options, warrants and restricted stock, based on
the fair market value of the award as of the grant date. The
Company uses the modified prospective application method to
record compensation cost related to unvested stock awards as of
March 25, 2006 by recognizing the unamortized grant date
fair value of these awards over the remaining service periods of
those awards with no change in historical reported earnings.
Awards granted after March 25, 2006 are valued at fair
value and are recognized on a straight line basis over the
service periods of each award. Excess tax benefits from the
exercise of stock awards are presented in the Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows as a financing activity. Excess tax
benefits are realized benefits from tax deductions for exercised
awards in excess of the deferred tax asset attributable to
40
stock-based compensation costs for such awards. The Company did
not have any stock-based compensation costs capitalized as part
of an asset. The Company estimates forfeiture rates based on its
historical experience.
The estimated fair value of the awards granted was calculated
using the Black-Scholes-Merton pricing model
(Black-Scholes), which produced a weighted average
fair value of awards granted of $4.59 per share in fiscal year
2008, $4.04 per share in fiscal year 2007 and $3.52 per share in
fiscal year 2006.
The following are the weighted average assumptions used in the
Black-Scholes model:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2008
|
|
FY 2007
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
Expected life
|
|
6 years
|
|
6 years
|
|
10 years
|
Annualized volatility rate
|
|
68.3%
|
|
79.7%
|
|
76.3%
|
Risk-free rate of return
|
|
4.5%
|
|
4.7%
|
|
4.3%
|
Dividend rate
|
|
0.0%
|
|
0.0%
|
|
0.0%
|
The Black-Scholes model incorporates assumptions to value
stock-based awards. The risk-free rate of return for periods
within the contractual life of the award is based on a
zero-coupon U.S. government instrument over the contractual
term of the equity instrument. Expected volatility is based on
historical volatility of the Companys stock. The expected
option term represents the period that stock-based awards are
expected to be outstanding based on the simplified method
provided in Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107
(SAB 107) which averages an awards
weighted-average vesting period and expected term for
plain vanilla share options. Under SAB 107,
options are considered to be plain vanilla if they
have the following basic characteristics: granted
at-the-money; exercisability is conditioned upon
service through the vesting date; termination of service prior
to vesting results in forfeiture; limited exercise period
following termination of service; and options are
non-transferable and non-hedgeable.
In December 2007, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
SEC) issued Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 110 (SAB 110), which was
effective January 1, 2008. SAB 110 expresses the views
of the Staff of the SEC regarding extending the use of the
simplified method, as discussed in SAB No. 107, in
developing an estimate of the expected term of plain
vanilla share options in accordance with SFAS 123R.
Prior to fiscal year 2007, the Company accounted for stock-based
compensation in accordance with Accounting Principles Board
Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,
using the intrinsic value method, which did not require that
compensation cost be recognized for the Companys stock
awards provided the exercise price was equal to or greater than
the common stock fair market value on the date of grant. Prior
to fiscal year 2007, the Company provided pro forma disclosure
amounts in accordance with SFAS No. 148, Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and
Disclosure, as if the fair value method had been applied to its
stock-based compensation. The Companys net income and net
income per share for fiscal year 2006 would have been reduced if
compensation cost related to stock awards had been recorded in
the financial statements based on fair value at the grant dates.
41
Pro forma net income for the year ended March 25, 2006, as
if the fair value based method had been applied to all stock
awards, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income, as reported
|
|
$
|
3,577
|
|
Add: Stock-based compensation expense included in reported net
income, net of related tax effects
|
|
|
122
|
|
Deduct: Total stock-based compensation expense determined under
fair value method for all awards, net of related tax effects
|
|
|
(317
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma Net Income
|
|
$
|
3,382
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings Per Share:
|
|
|
|
|
Basic - as reported
|
|
$
|
0.54
|
|
Basic - pro forma
|
|
$
|
0.51
|
|
Average Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
6,647
|
|
Diluted - as reported
|
|
$
|
0.50
|
|
Diluted - pro forma
|
|
$
|
0.47
|
|
Average Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
7,176
|
|
Revenue Recognition: Product sales are
recorded when a products title and risk of loss transfers
to the customer. The Company recognizes the majority of its
service revenue based upon when the calibration or repair
activity is performed and then shipped
and/or
delivered to the customer. Some of the service revenue is
generated from managing customers calibration programs in
which the Company recognizes revenue in equal amounts at fixed
intervals. The Company generally invoices its customers for
freight, shipping, and handling charges. The Companys
prices are fixed and determinable, collection of the resulting
receivable is probable, and returns are reasonably estimated.
Provisions for customer returns are provided for in the period
the related revenue is recorded based upon historical data.
Vendor Rebates: Vendor rebates are based on a
specified cumulative level of purchases and incremental product
sales and are recorded as a reduction of cost of products sold
as the milestone is achieved.
Cooperative Advertising Income: Transcat
follows the provisions of the Emerging Issues Task Force
(EITF) Issue
No. 02-16,
Accounting by a Reseller for Cash Consideration Received from a
Vendor, which provides that cash consideration received from a
vendor by a reseller be reported as a reduction of cost of
products sold as the related inventory is sold. During fiscal
years 2008, 2007 and 2006, the Company recorded, as a reduction
of cost of products sold, consideration in the amount of
$1.1 million, $0.9 million and $0.7 million,
respectively.
Shipping and Handling Costs: Freight expense
and direct shipping costs are included in cost of products and
services sold. These costs were approximately $1.4 million,
$1.2 million and $1.4 million for fiscal years 2008,
2007 and 2006, respectively. Direct handling costs, the majority
of which represent direct compensation of employees who pick,
pack, and otherwise prepare, if necessary, merchandise for
shipment to customers are reflected in selling, marketing, and
warehouse expenses. These costs were approximately
$0.4 million for fiscal years 2008, 2007 and 2006.
Gain on TPG Divestiture: During the fiscal
year ended March 31, 2002, the Company sold Transmation
Products Group (TPG). As a result of certain post
closing commitments, the Company deferred recognition of a
$1.5 million gain on the sale. During fiscal year 2007, the
Company satisfied those commitments and consequently realized
the gain as a component of operating income in the accompanying
Consolidated Financial Statements. See Note 9 below for
further discussion of the TPG divestiture.
Foreign Currency Translation and
Transactions: The accounts of Transmation
(Canada) Inc. are maintained in the local currency and have been
translated to United States dollars in accordance with
SFAS No. 52, Foreign Currency Translation.
Accordingly, the amounts representing assets and liabilities,
except for equity, have been translated at the period-end rates
of exchange and related revenue and expense accounts have been
translated at average rates of exchange during the period. Gains
and losses arising from translation of
42
Transmation (Canada) Inc.s balance sheets into United
States dollars are recorded directly to the accumulated other
comprehensive income component of shareholders equity.
Transcat records foreign currency gains and losses on Canadian
business transactions. The net foreign currency loss was
$0.4 million in fiscal year 2008 and less than
$0.1 million in each of the fiscal years 2007 and 2006.
During the third and fourth quarters of fiscal year 2008, the
Company entered into foreign exchange forward contracts to
reduce any further risk that its earnings would be adversely
affected by changes in currency exchange rates. The contracts
were accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.
The Company did not apply hedge accounting and therefore, the
change in the fair value of the contracts, which totaled
$0.2 million, was recognized in current earnings as a
component of other expense in the Consolidated Statements of
Operations. The change in the fair value of the contracts was
offset by the change in fair value on the underlying
intercompany assets and liabilities being hedged. On
March 29, 2008 and March 31, 2007, there were no
hedging arrangements outstanding. The Company does not use
hedging arrangements for speculative purposes.
Comprehensive Income: Transcat reports
comprehensive income under SFAS No. 130, Reporting
Comprehensive Income. Other comprehensive income is comprised of
net income, currency translation adjustments and unrecognized
prior service costs, net of tax. At March 29, 2008,
accumulated other comprehensive income consisted of cumulative
currency translation gains of $0.6 million and unrecognized
prior service costs, net of tax, of $0.2 million. At
March 31, 2007, accumulated other comprehensive income
consisted of cumulative currency translation gains of
$0.2 million and unrecognized prior service costs, net of
tax, of $0.2 million.
Earnings Per Share: Basic earnings per share
of common stock are computed based on the weighted average
number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period.
Diluted earnings per share of common stock reflect the assumed
conversion of dilutive stock options, warrants, and unvested
restricted stock awards. In computing the per share effect of
assumed conversion, funds which would have been received from
the exercise of options, warrants, and unvested restricted stock
are considered to have been used to purchase shares of common
stock at the average market price during the period, and the
resulting net additional shares of common stock are included in
the calculation of average shares of common stock outstanding.
For fiscal years 2008, 2007 and 2006, the net additional common
stock equivalents had a $0.01 per share effect, a $0.02 per
share effect and a $0.04 per share effect, respectively, on the
calculation of dilutive earnings per share. The total number of
dilutive and anti-dilutive common stock equivalents resulting
from stock options, warrants, and unvested restricted stock are
summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 29,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 25,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Shares Outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
421
|
|
|
|
529
|
|
Anti-dilutive
|
|
|
615
|
|
|
|
374
|
|
|
|
393
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
755
|
|
|
|
795
|
|
|
|
922
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Range of Exercise Prices per Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
$
|
2.20-$7.72
|
|
|
$
|
0.97-$5.80
|
|
|
$
|
0.80-$4.52
|
|
Warrants
|
|
$
|
2.31-$5.80
|
|
|
$
|
0.97-$5.80
|
|
|
$
|
0.97-$4.26
|
|
Reclassification of Amounts: Certain
reclassifications of financial information for prior fiscal
years have been made to conform to the presentation for the
current fiscal year.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements: In
December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007),
Business Combinations (SFAS 141R). This
statement establishes principles and requirements for how an
acquirer in a business combination recognizes and measures in
its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the
liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest; recognizes
and measures the goodwill acquired in the business combination
or a gain from a bargain purchase; and determines what
information to disclose to enable users of the financial
statements to evaluate
43
the nature and financial effects of the business combination.
SFAS 141R also requires acquisition-related transaction
expenses and restructuring costs be expensed as incurred rather
than capitalized as a component of the business combination.
SFAS 141R is to be applied prospectively to business
combinations beginning in the Companys fiscal year ending
March 27, 2010.
In September 2006, FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair
Value Measurements (SFAS 157), which defines
fair value, establishes guidelines for measuring fair value and
expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157
does not require any new fair value measurements but rather
eliminates inconsistencies in guidance found in various prior
accounting pronouncements. SFAS 157 is effective for fiscal
years beginning after November 15, 2007, the Companys
fiscal year ending March 28, 2009. In February 2008, the
FASB issued Financial Statement of Position
No. 157-2,
Partial Deferral of the Effective Date of Statement 157
(FSP 157-2).
FSP 157-2
delays the effective date of SFAS 157, for all nonfinancial
assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those that are
recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial
statements on a recurring basis (at least annually) to fiscal
years beginning after November 15, 2008. The Company is
currently evaluating the impact of SFAS 157, but does not
expect the adoption of SFAS 157 to have a material impact
on its Consolidated Financial Statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51
(SFAS 160). This statement applies to the
accounting for noncontrolling interests (previously referred to
as minority interest) in a subsidiary and for the
deconsolidation of a subsidiary. SFAS 160 requires
noncontrolling interests to be reported as a component of
equity, which changes the accounting for transactions with
noncontrolling interest holders. SFAS 160 becomes effective
for the Company in the fiscal year ending March 27, 2010.
Since the Company does not currently have any noncontrolling
interests, the adoption of this statement is not expected to
have an impact on the Companys Consolidated Financial
Statements.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161,
Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
(SFAS 161). This statement is intended to
improve financial reporting about derivative instruments and
hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures to enable
investors to better understand their effects on an entitys
financial position, financial performance, and cash flows.
SFAS 161 is effective for financial statements issued for
fiscal years and interim periods beginning after
November 15, 2008. The Company is currently evaluating the
impact of adopting SFAS 161 on its Consolidated Financial
Statements.
|
|
NOTE 2
|
PROPERTY
AND EQUIPMENT
|
Property and equipment consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 29,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Machinery, Equipment, and Software
|
|
$
|
13,875
|
|
|
$
|
12,509
|
|
Furniture and Fixtures
|
|
|
1,475
|
|
|
|
1,425
|
|
Leasehold Improvements
|
|
|
602
|
|
|
|
393
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Property and Equipment
|
|
$
|
15,952
|
|
|
$
|
14,327
|
|
Less: Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization
|
|
|
(12,741
|
)
|
|
|
(11,513
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Property and Equipment, net
|
|
$
|
3,211
|
|
|
$
|
2,814
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total depreciation and amortization expense amounted to
$1.1 million, $1.0 million and $0.8 million in
fiscal years 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Description. On November 21, 2006,
Transcat entered into a Credit Agreement (the Chase Credit
Agreement) with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. The Chase Credit
Agreement provides for a three-year revolving credit facility in
the amount of $10 million (the Revolving Credit
Facility). As of March 29, 2008 and March 31,
2007, $0.3 million and $2.9 million, respectively,
were outstanding under the Chase Credit
44
Agreement. The Chase Credit Agreement replaced the Amended and
Restated Loan and Security Agreement dated November 1,
2004, as further amended, with GMAC Commercial Finance LLC.
Interest and Commitment Fees. Interest
on the Revolving Credit Facility accrues, at Transcats
election, at either a base rate (defined as the highest of
prime, a three month certificate of deposit plus 1%, or the
federal funds rate plus
1/2
of 1%) (the Base Rate) or the London Interbank
Offered Rate (LIBOR), in each case, plus a margin.
Commitment fees accrue based on the average daily amount of
unused credit available on the Revolving Credit Facility.
Interest and commitment fees are adjusted on a quarterly basis
based upon the Companys calculated leverage ratio, as
defined in the Chase Credit Agreement. The Base Rate and the
LIBOR rates as of March 29, 2008 were 5.3% and 2.7%,
respectively. The Companys interest rate for fiscal year
2008 ranged from 3.2% to 7.6%.
Covenants. The Chase Credit Agreement
has certain covenants with which the Company has to comply,
including a fixed charge ratio covenant and a leverage ratio
covenant. The Company was in compliance with all loan covenants
and requirements throughout fiscal year 2008.
Loan Costs. In accordance with EITF
Issue
No. 98-14,
Debtors Accounting for Changes in Line-of-Credit or
Revolving-Debt Arrangements, costs associated with the Chase
Credit Agreement, totaling less than $0.1 million, are
being amortized over the term of the agreement. On
November 21, 2006, unamortized costs associated with the
GMAC Credit Agreement totaling $0.1 million, including the
termination premium of less than $0.1 million, were written
off and recorded as other expense in the Consolidated Statement
of Operations.
Other Terms. The Company has pledged
all of its U.S. tangible and intangible personal property
as collateral security for the loans made under the Revolving
Credit Facility.
Transcats net income before income taxes on the
Consolidated Statement of Operations is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2008
|
|
|
FY 2007
|
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
2,695
|
|
|
$
|
2,997
|
|
|
$
|
621
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,745
|
|
|
$
|
3,276
|
|
|
$
|
929
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The net provision for (benefit from) income taxes for fiscal
years 2008, 2007 and 2006 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2008
|
|
|
FY 2007
|
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
|
Current Tax Provision (Benefit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
236
|
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
|
$
|
(35
|
)
|
State
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
342
|
|
|
$
|
99
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Tax Provision (Benefit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
69
|
|
|
$
|
1,036
|
|
|
$
|
(2,453
|
)
|
State
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
(209
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
|
$
|
1,118
|
|
|
$
|
(2,662
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for (Benefit from) Income Taxes
|
|
$
|
382
|
|
|
$
|
1,217
|
|
|
$
|
(2,648
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
A reconciliation of the income tax provision computed by
applying the statutory United States federal income tax rate and
the income tax provision reflected in the Consolidated
Statements of Operations is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2008
|
|
|
FY 2007
|
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
|
Federal Income Tax at Statutory Rate
|
|
$
|
933
|
|
|
$
|
1,114
|
|
|
$
|
211
|
|
State Income Taxes, net of Federal benefit
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Valuation Allowance
|
|
|
(784
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,983
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
382
|
|
|
$
|
1,217
|
|
|
$
|
(2,648
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of the net deferred tax assets are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 29,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Current Deferred Tax Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Operating Loss Carryforward
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
514
|
|
Other
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
337
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Deferred Tax Assets
|
|
$
|
248
|
|
|
$
|
851
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Current Deferred Tax Assets (Liabilities):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Operating Loss Carryforward
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
Stock-Based Compensation
|
|
|
281
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
458
|
|
|
|
829
|
|
Foreign Tax Credits (expiring in March 2018)
|
|
|
745
|
|
|
|
757
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
(425
|
)
|
|
|
(426
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
411
|
|
|
|
424
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Non-Current Deferred Tax Assets
|
|
$
|
1,470
|
|
|
$
|
1,610
|
|
Valuation Allowance(1)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
(819
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Non-Current Deferred Tax Assets
|
|
$
|
1,435
|
|
|
$
|
791
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Deferred Tax Assets
|
|
$
|
1,683
|
|
|
$
|
1,642
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Deferred taxes recognize the impact of temporary differences
between the amounts of assets and liabilities recorded for
financial statement purposes and such amounts measured in
accordance with tax laws. In general, each deferred tax asset is
reviewed for expected utilization, using a more likely
than not approach, based on the character of the item
(credit, loss, etc.), the relevant history for the particular
item, the applicable expiration dates, operating projects that
would impact utilization, and identified actions under the
control of the Company in realizing the associated benefits. |
|
|
|
The Company assesses the available positive and negative
evidence surrounding the recoverability of the deferred tax
assets and applies its judgment in estimating the amount of the
valuation allowance necessary under the circumstances. |
|
|
|
In fiscal year 2008, after reassessing all available evidence,
the Company determined that it was more likely than not that the
benefits associated with its U.S. foreign tax credit
carryforwards would be realized. As a result, the Company
reduced its deferred tax valuation allowance by
$0.8 million and recorded the reduction as a benefit from
income taxes in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. |
Deferred U.S. income taxes have not been recorded for basis
differences related to the investments in the Companys
foreign subsidiary, which consist primarily of undistributed
earnings. During fiscal year 2008, the Companys foreign
subsidiary declared and paid dividends to Transcat in the amount
of $2.6 million (in U.S. dollars), of which
$1.3 million was previously taxed. The Company incurred
additional tax of $0.4 million on the remaining dividend,
which was fully offset by the utilization of a portion of the
Companys available
46
foreign tax credits, as a component of the provision for income
taxes in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The
remaining earnings of the Companys foreign subsidiary are
considered permanently reinvested in the subsidiary, therefore,
the determination of the deferred tax liability on unremitted
earnings is not practicable because such liability, if any,
depends on circumstances existing if and when remittance occurs.
Effective April 1, 2007, the Company adopted FASB
Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes an interpretation of FASB Statement
No. 109 (FIN 48). FIN 48 establishes
a single model to address accounting for uncertain tax positions
and clarifies the accounting for income taxes by prescribing a
minimum recognition threshold that a tax position is required to
meet before being recognized in the financial statements. Upon
adoption of FIN 48, the Company had no unrecognized tax
benefits. During fiscal year 2008, the Company recognized no
adjustments for uncertain tax benefits and expects no material
changes to unrecognized tax positions within the next twelve
months.
The Company recognizes interest and penalties, if any, related
to uncertain tax positions in the provision for income taxes. No
interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions were
recognized in fiscal year 2008 or accrued at March 29, 2008.
The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal
jurisdiction, various states and Canada. The Company is no
longer subject to examination by U.S. federal income tax
authorities for the tax years 2004 and prior, by state tax
authorities for the tax years 2004 and prior, and by Canadian
tax authorities for the tax years 2002 and prior. There are no
tax years currently under examination by U.S. federal,
state or Canadian tax authorities.
In May 2007, the FASB issued Staff Position
FIN 48-1,
Definition of Settlement in FASB Interpretation No. 48
(FSP
FIN 48-1).
FSP
FIN 48-1
provides guidance on how to determine whether a tax position is
effectively settled for the purpose of recognizing previously
unrecognized tax benefits. The implementation of this standard
did not have an impact on the Companys Consolidated
Financial Statements.
|
|
NOTE 5
|
DEFINED
CONTRIBUTION PLAN
|
All of Transcats United States employees are eligible to
participate in a defined contribution plan, the Long-Term
Savings and Deferred Profit Sharing Plan (the Plan),
provided certain qualifications are met.
In the Long-Term Savings portion of the Plan (the 401K
Portion), plan participants are entitled to a distribution
of their vested account balance upon termination of employment
or retirement. Plan participants are fully vested in their
contributions while Company contributions vest over a three year
period. The Companys matching contributions to the 401K
Portion were $0.3 million in the fiscal year 2008 and
$0.2 million in the fiscal years 2007 and 2006.
In the Deferred Profit Sharing portion of the Plan, employer
contributions are made at the discretion of the Board of
Directors. The Company made no profit sharing contributions in
fiscal years 2008, 2007 and 2006.
|
|
NOTE 6
|
POSTRETIREMENT
HEALTH CARE PLANS
|
In December 2006, the Company adopted two defined benefit
postretirement health care plans. One plan provides limited
reimbursement to eligible non-officer participants for the cost
of individual medical insurance coverage purchased by the
participant following qualifying retirement from employment with
the Company (the Non-Officer Plan). The other plan
provides long term care insurance benefits, medical and dental
insurance benefits and medical premium reimbursement benefits to
eligible retired corporate officers and their eligible spouses
(the Officer Plan).
The Company accounts for the plans in accordance with
SFAS No. 106, Employers Accounting for
Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions;
SFAS No. 132 (revised 2003), Employers
Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits, an
amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, and 106; and
SFAS No. 158, Employers Accounting for Defined
Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans.
47
The change in the postretirement benefit obligation is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inception to
|
|
|
|
FY 2008
|
|
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
Postretirement benefit obligation, at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
261
|
|
|
$
|
262
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Actuarial loss (gain)
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Postretirement benefit obligation, at end of year
|
|
|
359
|
|
|
|
261
|
|
Fair value of plan assets, at end of year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status, at end of year
|
|
$
|
(359
|
)
|
|
$
|
(261
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation, at end of year
|
|
$
|
359
|
|
|
$
|
261
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accumulated postretirement benefit obligation is included as
a component of other liabilities (non-current) in the
Consolidated Balance Sheets. The components of net periodic
postretirement benefit cost and other amounts recognized in
other comprehensive income are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inception to
|
|
|
|
FY 2008
|
|
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
Net periodic postretirement benefit cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
34
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Unrecognized prior service cost, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and other
comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income, At
end of year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized prior service cost, net of tax
|
|
$
|
152
|
|
|
$
|
161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The prior service cost is amortized on a straight-line basis
over the average remaining service period of active participants
for the Non-Officer Plan and over the average remaining life
expectancy of active participants for the Officer Plan. The
estimated prior service cost that will be amortized from
accumulated other comprehensive gain into net periodic
postretirement benefit cost during the fiscal year ending
March 28, 2009 is less than $0.1 million.
The postretirement benefit obligation was computed by an
independent third party actuary. Assumptions used to determine
the postretirement benefit obligation and the net periodic
benefit cost were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 29,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
At
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Inception
|
|
|
Weighted average discount rate
|
|
|
6.7
|
%
|
|
|
6.1
|
%
|
|
|
5.9
|
%
|
Medical care cost trend rate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trend rate assumed for next year
|
|
|
9.5
|
%
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
Ultimate trend rate
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
Year that rate reaches ultimate trend rate
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
Dental care cost trend rate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trend rate assumed for next year and remaining at that level
thereafter
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
48
Benefit payments are funded by the Company as needed. Payments
toward the cost of a retirees medical and dental coverage,
which are initially determined as a percentage of a base
coverage plan in the year of retirement as defined in the plan
document, are limited to increase at a rate of no more than 3%
per year. The following benefit payments, which reflect expected
future service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
2010
|
|
|
4
|
|
2011
|
|
|
12
|
|
2012
|
|
|
17
|
|
2013
|
|
|
34
|
|
2014-2018
|
|
|
249
|
|
Increasing the assumed health care cost trend rate by one
percentage point would increase the accumulated postretirement
benefit obligation and the annual net periodic cost by less than
$0.1 million. A one percentage point decrease in the
healthcare cost trend would decrease the accumulated
postretirement benefit obligation and the annual net periodic
cost by less than $0.1 million.
|
|
NOTE 7
|
STOCK-BASED
COMPENSATION
|
Stock Options: The Transcat, Inc. 2003
Incentive Plan (the 2003 Plan), provides for grants
of options to directors, officers and key employees to purchase
common stock at no less than the fair market value at the date
of grant. Options generally vest over a period of up to four
years and expire up to ten years from the date of grant.
Beginning in the second quarter of fiscal year 2008, options
granted to executive officers vest using a graded schedule of 0%
in the first year, 20% in each of the second and third years,
and 60% in the fourth year. Prior options granted to executive
officers vested equally over three years. The expense relating
to these executive officer options is recognized on a
straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the
entire award.
The following table summarizes the Companys options for
fiscal years 2008, 2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
Price per
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
Term (in Years)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Outstanding as of March 26, 2005
|
|
|
688
|
|
|
$
|
1.65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
4.31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(252
|
)
|
|
|
1.51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled/Forfeited
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
2.65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding as of March 25, 2006
|
|
|
452
|
|
|
|
1.97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
5.69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(170
|
)
|
|
|
1.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled/Forfeited
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
2.64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding as of March 31, 2007
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
3.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
407
|
|
|
|
6.90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
1.37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled/Forfeited
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
4.12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding as of March 29, 2008
|
|
|
656
|
|
|
|
5.64
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
512
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable as of March 29, 2008
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
|
3.15
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
464
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the
total pre-tax intrinsic value (the difference between the
Companys closing stock price on the last trading day of
fiscal year 2008 and the exercise price,
49
multiplied by the number of in-the-money stock options) that
would have been received by the option holders had all option
holders exercised their options on March 29, 2008. The
amount of aggregate intrinsic value will change based on the
fair market value of the Companys stock.
During the fiscal years 2008, 2007 and 2006, the Company
recorded non-cash stock-based compensation in the amount of
$0.8 million, $0.4 million and $0.1 million,
respectively. Total unrecognized compensation cost related to
non-vested stock options as of March 29, 2008 was
$1.4 million, which is expected to be recognized over a
weighted average period of 2 years. The aggregate intrinsic
value of stock options exercised during fiscal years 2008, 2007
and 2006 was $0.3 million, $0.7 million and
$0.9 million, respectively. Cash receipts from the exercise
of options were $0.1 million in fiscal year 2008, less than
$0.1 million in fiscal year 2007 and $0.3 million in
fiscal year 2006.
The following table presents options outstanding and exercisable
as of March 29, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding
|
|
|
|
Options Exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
per
|
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
per
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
(in Years)
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Share
|
|
Range of Exercise Prices:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$2.20-$3.50
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
2.52
|
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
$
|
2.52
|
|
$3.51-$5.00
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
4.31
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
4.31
|
|
$5.01-$6.50
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
5.59
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
5.68
|
|
$6.51-$7.72
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
7.72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
656
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
5.64
|
|
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
|
3.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants: Under the Directors Warrant
Plan, as amended, warrants were granted to non-employee
directors to purchase common stock at the fair market value at
the date of grant. Warrants vest over a period of three or four
years and expire in five years from the date of grant.
The following table summarizes warrants for fiscal years 2008,
2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
Price per
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
Term (in Years)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Outstanding as of March 26, 2005
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
$
|
2.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
4.26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
2.91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled and Expired
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
2.91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding as of March 25, 2006
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
2.62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
5.80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
1.90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding as of March 31, 2007
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
3.27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
1.82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled and Expired
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
4.51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding as of March 29, 2008
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
3.75
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
179
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable as of March 29, 2008
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
3.34
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the
total pre-tax intrinsic value (the difference between the
Companys closing stock price on the last trading day of
fiscal year 2008 and the exercise price, multiplied by the
number of in-the-money warrants) that would have been received
by the warrant holders had
50
all warrant holders exercised their warrants on March 29,
2008. The amount of aggregate intrinsic value will change based
on the fair market value of the Companys stock.
The aggregate intrinsic value of warrants exercised was
$0.2 million in fiscal year 2008 and $0.1 million in
each of the fiscal years 2007 and 2006. Cash received from the
exercise of warrants was less than $0.1 million in each of
the fiscal years 2008, 2007 and 2006.
The following table presents warrants outstanding and
exercisable as of March 29, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
(in Years)
|
|
|
|
(in Shares)
|
|
Exercise Prices:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$2.31
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
$2.88
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
$4.26
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
$5.80
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During fiscal year 2007, all warrants authorized for issuance
pursuant to the Directors Warrant Plan, as amended, had
been granted. Warrants outstanding on March 29, 2008
continue to vest and be exercisable in accordance with the terms
of the Directors Warrant Plan. In August 2006, the
Companys shareholders approved an amendment to the 2003
Plan permitting directors to participate. During fiscal year
2008, 36 thousand options were granted to directors and are
included in the option table above.
On November 13, 2002, the Company granted warrants to
purchase 0.5 million shares of common stock to its prior
lenders, Key Bank, N.A. and Citizens Bank, in accordance with a
termination agreement for the refinancing of debt. In each of
the fiscal years 2005 and 2006, 0.1 million of the shares
expired unexercised. In November 2007, the remaining
0.3 million shares expired unexercised and were converted
to capital in excess of par value.
Restricted Stock: The 2003 Plan also allows
the Company to grant stock awards. Stock awards granted in
fiscal year 2008 vested immediately and awards granted in fiscal
years 2007 and 2006 vested 50% at date of grant and 50% one year
later.
The following table summarizes stock awards for fiscal years
2008, 2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
Unvested Balance, March 26, 2005
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
$
|
2.86
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
4.26
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
3.27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested Balance, March 25, 2006
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
4.26
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
5.68
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
4.95
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested Balance, March 31, 2007
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
5.68
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
7.72
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
7.04
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested Balance, March 29, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
Total expense, based on fair market value, amounted to
$0.2 million, $0.1 million and $0.2 million in
fiscal years 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. There was no
unearned compensation at March 29, 2008 and less than
$0.1 million at March 31, 2007.
|
|
NOTE 8
|
SEGMENT
AND GEOGRAPHIC DATA
|
Transcat has two reportable segments: Distribution
Products (Product) and Calibration Services
(Service). The accounting policies of the reportable
segments are the same as those described above in Note 1 of
the Consolidated Financial Statements. The Company has no
inter-segment revenues. The following table presents segment and
geographic data for fiscal years 2008, 2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2008
|
|
|
FY 2007
|
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
Net Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
$
|
47,539
|
|
|
$
|
45,411
|
|
|
$
|
40,814
|
|
Service
|
|
|
22,914
|
|
|
|
21,062
|
|
|
|
19,657
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
70,453
|
|
|
|
66,473
|
|
|
|
60,471
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
|
13,205
|
|
|
|
11,992
|
|
|
|
9,812
|
|
Service
|
|
|
5,336
|
|
|
|
4,621
|
|
|
|
5,287
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
18,541
|
|
|
|
16,613
|
|
|
|
15,099
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product(1)
|
|
|
9,392
|
|
|
|
8,467
|
|
|
|
7,934
|
|
Service(1)
|
|
|
5,866
|
|
|
|
5,797
|
|
|
|
5,647
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
15,258
|
|
|
|
14,264
|
|
|
|
13,581
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on TPG Divestiture
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,544
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income
|
|
|
3,283
|
|
|
|
3,893
|
|
|
|
1,518
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated Amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Expense, net
|
|
|
538
|
|
|
|
617
|
|
|
|
589
|
|
Provision for (Benefit from) Income Taxes
|
|
|
382
|
|
|
|
1,217
|
|
|
|
(2,648
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
920
|
|
|
|
1,834
|
|
|
|
(2,059
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
$
|
2,363
|
|
|
$
|
2,059
|
|
|
$
|
3,577
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets(2):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
$
|
13,871
|
|
|
$
|
12,764
|
|
|
$
|
10,703
|
|
Service
|
|
|
7,407
|
|
|
|
6,794
|
|
|
|
7,352
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
3,066
|
|
|
|
2,864
|
|
|
|
3,433
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
24,344
|
|
|
$
|
22,422
|
|
|
$
|
21,488
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization(3):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
$
|
739
|
|
|
$
|
625
|
|
|
$
|
612
|
|
Service
|
|
|
893
|
|
|
|
849
|
|
|
|
603
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,761
|
|
|
$
|
1,622
|
|
|
$
|
1,401
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Expenditures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
|
$
|
181
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Service
|
|
|
1,268
|
|
|
|
878
|
|
|
|
623
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,505
|
|
|
$
|
1,194
|
|
|
$
|
914
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2008
|
|
|
FY 2007
|
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
Geographic Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenues to Unaffiliated Customers(4):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States(6)
|
|
$
|
63,945
|
|
|
$
|
59,673
|
|
|
$
|
54,778
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
6,508
|
|
|
|
6,800
|
|
|
|
5,693
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
70,453
|
|
|
$
|
66,473
|
|
|
$
|
60,471
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Lived Assets(5):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States(6)
|
|
$
|
3,093
|
|
|
$
|
2,613
|
|
|
$
|
2,422
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
3,211
|
|
|
$
|
2,814
|
|
|
$
|
2,687
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Operating expense allocations between segments were based on
actual amounts, a percentage of revenues, headcount, and
managements estimates. |
|
(2) |
|
Goodwill is allocated based on the percentage of segment revenue
acquired. For fiscal years 2008, 2007 and 2006, goodwill of
$3.0 million was allocated amongst our segments as follows:
51% to Product and 49% to Service. |
|
(3) |
|
Including amortization of catalog costs. |
|
(4) |
|
Net revenues are attributed to the countries based on the
destination of a product shipment or the location where service
is rendered. |
|
(5) |
|
Long-lived assets consist of property and equipment and are
entirely allocated to the United States with the exception of
Canadian fixed assets. |
|
(6) |
|
United States includes Puerto Rico. |
Leases: Transcat leases facilities, equipment,
and vehicles under non-cancelable operating leases. Total rental
expense was approximately $1.1 million for fiscal years
2008 and 2007 and approximately $0.9 million for fiscal
year 2006. The minimum future annual rental payments under the
non-cancelable leases at March 29, 2008 are as follows (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
0.7
|
|
2010
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
2011
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
2012
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
2013
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments
|
|
$
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsequent to March 29, 2008, the Company entered into an
agreement to extend the operating lease for its facility in
Rochester, NY through March 31, 2019 (the Lease
Extension). The Lease Extension will become effective upon
completion of an expansion of the existing facility, which is
expected to occur during the second quarter of the
Companys fiscal year ending March 28, 2009 and will
be funded solely by the independent landlord. The total minimum
future rental payments under the Lease Extension will be
approximately $3.4 million.
Unconditional Purchase Obligation: In fiscal
year 2002, in connection with the sale of TPG to Fluke
Electronics Corporation (Fluke), the Company entered
into a distribution agreement with Fluke. Under the distribution
agreement, among other items, the Company agreed to purchase a
pre-determined amount of inventory during each calendar year
from 2002 to 2006. In December 2006, the Companys
purchases
53
exceeded the required amount for calendar year 2006, as they had
in each of the prior four years, which fulfilled the
Companys contractual purchase obligations to Fluke under
the distribution agreement and triggered the recognition of the
previously deferred gain totaling $1.5 million in fiscal
year 2007.
In February 2006, Transcat acquired N.W. Calibration Inspection,
Inc. (NWCI) in Fort Wayne, Indiana. NWCI
provides dimensional calibration, first part inspection, and
reverse engineering services to the pharmaceutical, medical
device, and automotive industries. The results of the acquired
business have been included in the calibration services segment
of the Consolidated Financial Statements since the acquisition
date. Pro-forma information for this acquisition is not included
as it did not have a material impact on the consolidated
financial position or results of operations.
|
|
NOTE 11
|
QUARTERLY
DATA (Unaudited)
|
The following table presents a summary of certain unaudited
quarterly financial data for fiscal years 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
Profit
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
FY 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
19,198
|
|
|
$
|
5,355
|
|
|
$
|
723
|
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
Third Quarter(1)
|
|
|
18,440
|
|
|
|
4,713
|
|
|
|
1,208
|
|
|
|
0.17
|
|
|
|
0.17
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
16,625
|
|
|
|
4,246
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
16,190
|
|
|
|
4,227
|
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
FY 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
18,853
|
|
|
$
|
4,962
|
|
|
$
|
489
|
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
Third Quarter(2)
|
|
|
17,240
|
|
|
|
4,298
|
|
|
|
1,207
|
|
|
|
0.17
|
|
|
|
0.16
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
14,860
|
|
|
|
3,525
|
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
0.04
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
15,519
|
|
|
|
3,828
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In the third quarter of fiscal year 2008, the Company reversed a
significant portion, $0.8 million, of its deferred tax
valuation allowance. See Note 4 above for further
disclosure. |
|
(2) |
|
In the third quarter of fiscal year 2007, the Company recognized
a previously deferred pre-tax gain of $1.5 million from the
sale of TPG to Fluke. See Note 9 above for further
disclosure. |
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Income)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Realized in
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
|
at the
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
(Reductions) to
|
|
|
at the
|
|
|
|
Beginning
|
|
|
Statements
|
|
|
Allowance/
|
|
|
End of
|
|
|
|
of the Year
|
|
|
of Operations
|
|
|
Reserve
|
|
|
the Year
|
|
|
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2008
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
|
$
|
49
|
|
|
$
|
(40
|
)
|
|
$
|
56
|
|
FY 2007
|
|
$
|
63
|
|
|
$
|
61
|
|
|
$
|
(77
|
)
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
$
|
56
|
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
|
$
|
(33
|
)
|
|
$
|
63
|
|
Reserve for Inventory Loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2008
|
|
$
|
129
|
|
|
$
|
(67
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
62
|
|
FY 2007
|
|
$
|
92
|
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
129
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
$
|
190
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
(104
|
)
|
|
$
|
92
|
|
Deferred Tax Valuation Allowance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2008
|
|
$
|
819
|
|
|
$
|
(784
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
FY 2007
|
|
$
|
819
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
819
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
$
|
3,802
|
|
|
$
|
(2,648
|
)
|
|
$
|
(335
|
)
|
|
$
|
819
|
|
55
ITEM 9. CHANGES
IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A(T). CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and
Procedures. Our principal executive officer and
our principal financial officer evaluated our disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e))
as of the end of the period covered by this annual report. Based
on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and our
principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure
controls and procedures were effective as of such date.
(b) Managements Report on Internal Control over
Financial Reporting. Our management is
responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal
control over financial reporting. Our internal control system
was designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of
America. An evaluation was performed under the supervision and
with the participation of our management, including the
principal executive officer and the principal financial officer,
of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our
procedures and internal control over financial reporting. Based
on this evaluation, our management, including the principal
executive officer and the principal financial officer, concluded
that our internal control over financial reporting was effective
in providing reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of our financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles as of March 29, 2008.
This annual report does not include an attestation report of our
registered public accounting firm regarding internal control
over financial reporting. Managements report on internal
control over financial reporting was not subject to attestation
by our independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to
temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that
permit us to provide only managements report in this
annual report.
(c) Inherent Limitations of Internal
Controls. In designing and evaluating our
internal control system, we recognize that any controls and
procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can
provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance of achieving
the desired control objectives and that the effectiveness of any
system has inherent limitations including, but not limited to,
the possibility of human error and the circumvention or
overriding of controls and procedures. Management, including the
principal executive officer and the principal financial officer,
is required to apply judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit
relationship of possible controls and procedures. Because of the
inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system,
misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be
detected in a timely manner.
(d) Changes in Internal Controls over Financial
Reporting. There has been no change in our
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the last fiscal quarter covered by this annual report (our
fourth fiscal quarter) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control
over financial reporting.
|
|
ITEM 9B.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
Not applicable.
PART III
|
|
ITEM 10.
|
DIRECTORS,
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
|
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by
reference from the information set forth under the caption
Executive Officers in Part I of this report and
the information set forth under the captions Election of
Directors, Executive Officers,
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting
Compliance
56
and Corporate Governance-Code of Ethics in our
definitive 2008 proxy statement to be filed pursuant to
Regulation 14A within 120 days of the end of the
fiscal year to which this report relates.
|
|
ITEM 11.
|
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
|
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by
reference from the information set forth under the caption
Compensation of Named Executive Officers and
Directors in our definitive 2008 proxy statement to be
filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days of
the end of the fiscal year to which this report relates.
ITEM 12. SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The information required by this Item, with the exception of the
information in the table below, is incorporated herein by
reference from the information set forth under the captions
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
Security Ownership of Management in our definitive
2008 proxy statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A
within 120 days of the end of the fiscal year to which this
report relates.
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation
Plans as of March 29, 2008:
Equity
Compensation Plan Information
(In
Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of securities
|
|
|
|
Number of securities
|
|
|
Weighted average
|
|
|
available for future
|
|
|
|
to be issued
|
|
|
exercise price
|
|
|
issuance under equity
|
|
|
|
upon exercise of
|
|
|
per share of
|
|
|
compensation plans
|
|
|
|
outstanding options
|
|
|
outstanding options
|
|
|
(excluding securities
|
|
|
|
and warrants
|
|
|
and warrants
|
|
|
reflected in column (a))
|
|
Plan category
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
|
|
|
756
|
|
|
$
|
5.39
|
|
|
|
375
|
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
756
|
|
|
$
|
5.39
|
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 13. CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by
reference from the information set forth under the caption
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions in
our definitive 2008 proxy statement to be filed pursuant to
Regulation 14A within 120 days of the end of the
fiscal year to which this report relates.
|
|
ITEM 14.
|
PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
|
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by
reference to the information set forth under the caption
Ratification of Selection of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm in our definitive 2008 proxy statement to
be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days of
the end of the fiscal year to which this report relates.
PART IV
|
|
ITEM 15.
|
EXHIBITS AND
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
|
(a) See Index to Financial Statements included in
Item 8 of this report.
(b) Exhibits.
See Index to Exhibits beginning on page 59 of this report.
57
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
TRANSCAT, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
Date: June 26, 2008
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Charles
P.
Hadeed Charles
P. Hadeed
Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Operating Officer
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
|
|
June 26, 2008
|
|
/s/ Charles
P. Hadeed
Charles
P. Hadeed
|
|
Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Operating Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 26, 2008
|
|
/s/ John
J. Zimmer
John
J. Zimmer
|
|
Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 26, 2008
|
|
/s/ Carl
E. Sassano
Carl
E. Sassano
|
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 26, 2008
|
|
/s/ Francis
R. Bradley
Francis
R. Bradley
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 26, 2008
|
|
/s/ Richard
J. Harrison
Richard
J. Harrison
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 26, 2008
|
|
/s/ Nancy
D. Hessler
Nancy
D. Hessler
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 26, 2008
|
|
/s/ Paul
D. Moore
Paul
D. Moore
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 26, 2008
|
|
/s/ Harvey
J. Palmer
Harvey
J. Palmer
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 26, 2008
|
|
/s/ Alan
H. Resnick
Alan
H. Resnick
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 26, 2008
|
|
/s/ John
T. Smith
John
T. Smith
|
|
Director
|
|
|
58
INDEX TO
EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws
|
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
The Articles of Incorporation, as amended, are incorporated
herein by reference from Exhibit 4(a) to the Companys
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 33-61665)
filed on August 8, 1995 and from Exhibit 3(i) to the
Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 1999.
|
|
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Code of Regulations as amended through August 21, 2007, are
incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to the
Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 29, 2007.
|
(10)
|
|
Material Contracts
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.1
|
|
Transcat, Inc. Amended and Restated Directors Warrant Plan
is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 99(b) to the
Companys Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration
No. 33-61665) filed on August 8, 1995.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.2
|
|
Transcat, Inc. Employees Stock Purchase Plan is
incorporated herein from Exhibit 99(e) to
the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-8
(Registration No. 33-61665) filed on August 8, 1995.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.3
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to the Transcat, Inc. Employees Stock
Purchase Plan is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit
10(b) to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended March 31, 1996.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.4
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Transcat, Inc. Amended and Restated
Directors Warrant Plan is incorporated herein by reference
from Exhibit II to the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1996.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.5
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to the Transcat, Inc. Employees Stock
Purchase Plan is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit V
to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 1996.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.6
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to the Transcat, Inc. Amended and Restated
Directors Warrant Plan is incorporated herein by reference
from Exhibit 10(i) to the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1997.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.7
|
|
Amendment No. 3 to the Transcat, Inc. Employees Stock
Purchase Plan is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit
10(k) to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended September 30, 1997.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.8
|
|
Amendments No. 3 and 4 to the Transcat, Inc. Amended and
Restated Directors Warrant Plan are incorporated herein by
reference from the Companys definitive proxy statement
filed on July 7, 1998 in connection with the 1998 Annual Meeting
of Shareholders.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.9
|
|
Amendment No. 5 to the Transcat, Inc. Amended and Restated
Directors Warrant Plan is incorporated herein by reference
from Appendix B to the Companys 1999 preliminary proxy
statement filed on June 21, 1999 in connection with the 1999
Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.10
|
|
Amendment No. 4 to the Transcat, Inc. Employees Stock
Purchase Plan is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit
10(a) to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended September 30, 2001.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.11
|
|
Form of Award Notice for Incentive Stock Options granted under
the Transcat, Inc. 2003 Incentive Plan is incorporated herein by
reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 25, 2004.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.12
|
|
Form of Award Notice for Restricted Stock granted under the
Transcat, Inc. 2003 Incentive Plan is incorporated herein by
reference from Exhibit 10.2 the Companys Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 25, 2004.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.13
|
|
Form of Warrant Certificate representing warrants granted under
the Amended and Restated Directors Warrant Plan is
incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.42 to the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended March 26, 2005.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.14
|
|
Form of Award Notice for Non-Qualified Stock Options granted
under the Transcat, Inc. 2003 Incentive Plan is incorporated
herein by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September
24, 2005.
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.15
|
|
Asset Purchase Agreement by and among Transcat, Inc., N.W.
Calibration Inspection, Inc. and the stockholders of N.W.
Calibration Inspection, Inc. dated as of February 28, 2006 is
incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the
Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 28,
2006.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.16
|
|
Form of Amended and Restated Agreement for Severance Upon Change
in Control for Charles P. Hadeed is incorporated herein by
reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current Report
on Form 8-K dated April 19, 2006.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.17
|
|
Transcat, Inc. 2003 Incentive Plan, as amended, is incorporated
herein by reference from Appendix D to the Companys
definitive proxy statement filed on July 10, 2006 in connection
with the 2006 annual meeting of shareholders.
|
|
|
|
10
|
.18
|
|
Credit Agreement dated as of November 21, 2006 by and between
Transcat, Inc. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. is incorporated
herein by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys
Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 21, 2006.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.19
|
|
Transcat, Inc. Post-Retirement Benefit Plan for Officers is
incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.2 the
Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended December 23, 2006.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.20
|
|
Transcat, Inc. Post-Retirement Benefit Plan for Non-Officer
Employees is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.3
the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended December 23, 2006.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.21
|
|
Certain compensation information for Carl E. Sassano, Executive
Chairman of the Board of the Company, and Charles P. Hadeed,
President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer
of the Company, is incorporated herein by reference from the
Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated April 10, 2007.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.22
|
|
Certain compensation information for certain executive officers
of the Company is incorporated herein by reference from the
Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 21,
2007.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.23
|
|
Certain compensation information for Charles P. Hadeed,
President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer
of the Company, and John J. Zimmer, Vice President of Finance
and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, is incorporated
herein by reference from the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K dated May 5, 2008.
|
(11)
|
|
Statement re computation of per share earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Computation can be clearly determined from the Consolidated
Statements of Operations and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income included in this Form 10-K as Item 8.
|
(21)
|
|
Subsidiaries of the registrant
|
|
|
|
*21
|
.1
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
(23)
|
|
Consents of experts and counsel
|
|
|
|
*23
|
.1
|
|
Consent of BDO Seidman, LLP
|
(31)
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications
|
|
|
|
*31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
*31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer
|
(32)
|
|
Section 1350 Certifications
|
|
|
|
*32
|
.1
|
|
Section 1350 Certifications
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Exhibits filed with this report. |
|
# |
|
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. |
60