FORM 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended: September 27, 2008
or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 000-03905
Transcat, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Ohio
|
|
16-0874418 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
incorporation or organization) |
|
|
35
Vantage Point Drive, Rochester, New York 14624
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(585) 352-7777
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act
(Check one).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company þ |
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
The number of shares of common stock, par value $0.50 per share, of the registrant outstanding as
of November 5, 2008 was 7,365,486.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TRANSCAT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
Second Quarter Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 27, |
|
|
September 29, |
|
|
September 27, |
|
|
September 29, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Product Sales |
|
$ |
12,954 |
|
|
$ |
11,219 |
|
|
$ |
25,265 |
|
|
$ |
22,146 |
|
Service Revenue |
|
|
5,656 |
|
|
|
5,406 |
|
|
|
11,198 |
|
|
|
10,669 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenue |
|
|
18,610 |
|
|
|
16,625 |
|
|
|
36,463 |
|
|
|
32,815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Products Sold |
|
|
9,568 |
|
|
|
8,089 |
|
|
|
18,517 |
|
|
|
15,955 |
|
Cost of Services Sold |
|
|
4,468 |
|
|
|
4,290 |
|
|
|
8,847 |
|
|
|
8,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Cost of Products
and Services Sold |
|
|
14,036 |
|
|
|
12,379 |
|
|
|
27,364 |
|
|
|
24,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit |
|
|
4,574 |
|
|
|
4,246 |
|
|
|
9,099 |
|
|
|
8,473 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, Marketing and Warehouse Expenses |
|
|
2,122 |
|
|
|
2,018 |
|
|
|
4,717 |
|
|
|
4,323 |
|
Administrative Expenses |
|
|
1,713 |
|
|
|
1,634 |
|
|
|
3,255 |
|
|
|
3,107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Expenses |
|
|
3,835 |
|
|
|
3,652 |
|
|
|
7,972 |
|
|
|
7,430 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income |
|
|
739 |
|
|
|
594 |
|
|
|
1,127 |
|
|
|
1,043 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
Other Expense, net |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Other Expense |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
353 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Before Income Taxes |
|
|
707 |
|
|
|
356 |
|
|
|
1,088 |
|
|
|
690 |
|
Provision for Income Taxes |
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
430 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
|
430 |
|
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
658 |
|
|
|
432 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income |
|
$ |
419 |
|
|
$ |
459 |
|
|
$ |
655 |
|
|
$ |
889 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Earnings Per Share |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
Average Shares Outstanding |
|
|
7,282 |
|
|
|
7,127 |
|
|
|
7,239 |
|
|
|
7,099 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted Earnings Per Share |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
Average Shares Outstanding |
|
|
7,511 |
|
|
|
7,577 |
|
|
|
7,453 |
|
|
|
7,474 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
TRANSCAT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 27, |
|
|
March 29, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
$ |
184 |
|
|
$ |
208 |
|
Accounts Receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $70
and $56 as of September 27, 2008 and March 29, 2008, respectively |
|
|
9,105 |
|
|
|
9,346 |
|
Other Receivables |
|
|
938 |
|
|
|
370 |
|
Inventory, net |
|
|
5,844 |
|
|
|
5,442 |
|
Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets |
|
|
1,227 |
|
|
|
773 |
|
Deferred Tax Asset |
|
|
462 |
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Assets |
|
|
17,760 |
|
|
|
16,387 |
|
Property and Equipment, net |
|
|
3,563 |
|
|
|
3,211 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
7,460 |
|
|
|
2,967 |
|
Intangible Asset |
|
|
1,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Tax Asset |
|
|
1,190 |
|
|
|
1,435 |
|
Other Assets |
|
|
367 |
|
|
|
344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
31,531 |
|
|
$ |
24,344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Payable |
|
$ |
6,064 |
|
|
$ |
5,947 |
|
Accrued Compensation and Other Liabilities |
|
|
2,921 |
|
|
|
2,489 |
|
Income Taxes Payable |
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Liabilities |
|
|
9,281 |
|
|
|
8,498 |
|
Long-Term Debt |
|
|
4,347 |
|
|
|
302 |
|
Other Liabilities |
|
|
503 |
|
|
|
427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
14,131 |
|
|
|
9,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock, par value $0.50 per share, 30,000,000 shares authorized;
7,633,694 and 7,446,223 shares issued as of September 27, 2008 and
March 29, 2008, respectively; 7,357,912 and 7,170,441 shares
outstanding as of September 27, 2008 and March 29, 2008, respectively |
|
|
3,817 |
|
|
|
3,723 |
|
Capital in Excess of Par Value |
|
|
8,183 |
|
|
|
6,649 |
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income |
|
|
433 |
|
|
|
436 |
|
Retained Earnings |
|
|
5,955 |
|
|
|
5,297 |
|
Less: Treasury Stock, at cost, 275,782 shares as of
September 27, 2008 and March 29, 2008 |
|
|
(988 |
) |
|
|
(988 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Shareholders Equity |
|
|
17,400 |
|
|
|
15,117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
$ |
31,531 |
|
|
$ |
24,344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
TRANSCAT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 27, |
|
|
September 29, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
658 |
|
|
$ |
432 |
|
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Provided by
Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Income Taxes |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
(85 |
) |
Depreciation and Amortization |
|
|
772 |
|
|
|
788 |
|
Provision for (Recovery of) Accounts Receivable and Inventory Reserves |
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
(63 |
) |
StockBased Compensation Expense |
|
|
355 |
|
|
|
428 |
|
Changes in Assets and Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Receivable and Other Receivables |
|
|
654 |
|
|
|
892 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
749 |
|
Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets |
|
|
(710 |
) |
|
|
(602 |
) |
Accounts Payable |
|
|
(269 |
) |
|
|
104 |
|
Accrued Compensation and Other Liabilities |
|
|
(601 |
) |
|
|
(595 |
) |
Income Taxes Payable |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities |
|
|
1,003 |
|
|
|
2,222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of Property and Equipment |
|
|
(587 |
) |
|
|
(999 |
) |
Purchase of Westcon, Inc., net of cash acquired |
|
|
(4,625 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities |
|
|
(5,212 |
) |
|
|
(999 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chase Revolving Line of Credit, net |
|
|
4,026 |
|
|
|
(1,576 |
) |
Issuance of Common Stock |
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
160 |
|
Excess Tax Benefits Related to StockBased Compensation |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities |
|
|
4,186 |
|
|
|
(1,407 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Decrease in Cash |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(169 |
) |
Cash at Beginning of Period |
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at End of Period |
|
$ |
184 |
|
|
$ |
188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Activity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
69 |
|
Income Taxes, net |
|
$ |
260 |
|
|
$ |
177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosure of NonCash Investing Activity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Issued in Connection with Business Acquisition |
|
$ |
1,113 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
TRANSCAT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
(In Thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
In |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued |
|
|
Excess |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$0.50 Par Value |
|
|
of Par |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
at Cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance as of March 29, 2008 |
|
|
7,446 |
|
|
$ |
3,723 |
|
|
$ |
6,649 |
|
|
$ |
436 |
|
|
$ |
5,297 |
|
|
|
276 |
|
|
$ |
(988 |
) |
|
$ |
15,117 |
|
Issuance of Common Stock |
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
1,138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,232 |
|
Stock-Based Compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
355 |
|
Tax Benefit from Stock-Based
Compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
Comprehensive Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency Translation
Adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
Unrecognized Prior Service
Cost, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
Net Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 27, 2008 |
|
|
7,634 |
|
|
$ |
3,817 |
|
|
$ |
8,183 |
|
|
$ |
433 |
|
|
$ |
5,955 |
|
|
|
276 |
|
|
$ |
(988 |
) |
|
$ |
17,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
6
TRANSCAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
(Unaudited)
NOTE 1 GENERAL
Description of Business: Transcat, Inc. (Transcat or the Company) is a leading global
distributor of professional grade test and measurement instruments and a provider of calibration,
3-D metrology and repair services to the life science, manufacturing, utility and process
industries.
Basis of Presentation: Transcats unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared
in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP) for
interim financial information and in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10
of Regulation S-X of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Accordingly, the Consolidated
Financial Statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for
complete financial statements. In the opinion of the Companys management, all adjustments
considered necessary for a fair presentation (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) have been
included. The results for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be
expected for the fiscal year. The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in
conjunction with the audited Consolidated Financial Statements as of and for the fiscal year ended
March 29, 2008 (fiscal year 2008) contained in the Companys 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K
filed with the SEC.
Principles of Consolidation: The Consolidated Financial Statements of Transcat include the
accounts of Transcat and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Transmation (Canada) Inc. and Westcon, Inc.
(Westcon). All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation.
On August 14, 2008, Transcat, through its wholly-owned subsidiary Transcat Acquisition Corp.
(Transcat Acquisition), acquired Westcon, an Oregon corporation, by merger with and into Transcat
Acquisition, which was the surviving entity. Concurrent with the closing of the merger, Transcat
Acquisitions name was changed to Westcon. See Note 5 for further information on the acquisition.
Stock-Based Compensation: In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)
No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123R), the Company measures the cost of
services received in exchange for all equity awards granted, including stock options, warrants and
restricted stock, based on the fair market value of the award as of the grant date. The Company
uses the modified prospective application method to record compensation cost related to unvested
stock awards as of March 25, 2006 by recognizing the unamortized grant date fair value of the
awards over the remaining service periods of those awards with no change in historical reported
earnings. Awards granted after March 25, 2006 are valued at fair value and are recognized on a
straight line basis over the service periods of each award. Excess tax benefits from the exercise
of stock awards are presented in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows as a financing activity.
Excess tax benefits are realized benefits from tax deductions for exercised awards in excess of
the deferred tax asset attributable to stock-based compensation costs for such awards. The Company
did not have any stock-based compensation costs capitalized as part of an asset. The Company
estimates forfeiture rates based on its historical experience.
The estimated fair value of the awards granted during the first six months of the fiscal year
ending March 28, 2009 (fiscal year 2009) was calculated using the Black-Scholes-Merton pricing
model (Black-Scholes), which produced a weighted average fair value of awards granted of $4.02
per share. During the second quarter and the first six months of fiscal year 2009, the Company
recorded non-cash stock-based compensation in the amount of $0.2 million and $0.4 million,
respectively, in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income.
The following summarizes the assumptions used in the Black-Scholes model during the first six
months of fiscal year 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
Expected life |
|
6 years |
Annualized volatility rate |
|
|
61.3 |
% |
Risk-free rate of return |
|
|
3.3 |
% |
Dividend rate |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
The Black-Scholes model incorporates assumptions to value stock-based awards. The risk-free rate
of return for periods within the contractual life of the award is based on a zero-coupon U.S.
government instrument over the contractual term of the equity instrument. Expected volatility is
based on historical volatility of the Companys stock. The expected option term represents the
period that stock-based awards are expected to be outstanding based on the simplified method
provided in Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 (SAB 107), which averages an awards
weighted-average vesting period and expected term
7
for plain vanilla share options. Under SAB 107, options are considered to be plain vanilla if
they have the following basic characteristics: granted at-the-money; exercisability is
conditioned upon service through the vesting date; termination of service prior to vesting results
in forfeiture; limited exercise period following termination of service; and options are
non-transferable and non-hedgeable. In December 2007, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No.
110 (SAB 110), which was effective January 1, 2008. SAB 110 expresses the views of the Staff of
the SEC regarding extending the use of the simplified method, as discussed in SAB 107, in
developing an estimate of the expected term of plain vanilla share options in accordance with
SFAS 123R. The Company will continue to use the simplified method until it has the historical data
necessary to provide a reasonable estimate of expected life in accordance with SAB 107, as amended
by SAB 110. For the expected term, the Company has plain vanilla stock options, and therefore
used a simple average of the vesting period and the contractual term for options granted subsequent
to January 1, 2006 as permitted by SAB 107.
Foreign Currency Translation and Transactions: The accounts of Transmation (Canada) Inc. are
maintained in the local currency and have been translated to United States dollars in accordance
with SFAS No. 52, Foreign Currency Translation. Accordingly, the amounts representing assets and
liabilities, except for equity, have been translated at the period-end rates of exchange and
related sales and expense amounts have been translated at average rates of exchange during the
period. Gains and losses arising from translation of Transmation (Canada) Inc.s balance sheets
into United States dollars are recorded directly to the accumulated other comprehensive income
component of shareholders equity.
Transcat records foreign currency gains and losses on Canadian business transactions. The net
foreign currency loss was less than $0.1 million in the first six months of fiscal year 2009 and
$0.3 million in the first six months of fiscal year 2008. The Company periodically enters into
foreign exchange forward contracts to reduce the risk that its earnings would be adversely affected
by changes in currency exchange rates. The contracts are accounted for in accordance with SFAS No.
133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. The Company does not apply
hedge accounting and therefore, the change in the fair value of the contracts, which totaled less
than $0.1 million during the second quarter and the first six months of fiscal year 2009, was
recognized in current earnings as a component of other expense in the Consolidated Statements of
Operations and Comprehensive Income. The change in the fair value of the contracts is offset by
the change in fair value on the underlying accounts receivable being hedged. On September 27,
2008, the Company had a foreign exchange forward contract, set to mature in October 2008,
outstanding in the notional amount of $0.3 million. The Company does not use hedging arrangements
for speculative purposes.
Earnings Per Share: Basic earnings per share of common stock is computed based on the weighted
average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share
of common stock reflect the assumed conversion of dilutive stock options, warrants, and unvested
restricted stock awards. In computing the per share effect of assumed conversion, funds which
would have been received from the exercise of options and warrants are considered to have been used
to purchase shares of common stock at the average market prices during the period, and the
resulting net additional shares of common stock are included in the calculation of average shares
of common stock outstanding.
For the second quarter and the first six months of fiscal years 2009 and 2008, the net additional
common stock equivalents had no effect on the calculation of dilutive earnings per share. The
total number of dilutive and anti-dilutive common stock equivalents resulting from stock options,
warrants and unvested restricted stock are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
September 27, |
|
September 29, |
|
September 27, |
|
September 29, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Shares Outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive |
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
375 |
|
Anti-dilutive |
|
|
559 |
|
|
|
626 |
|
|
|
574 |
|
|
|
701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
788 |
|
|
|
1,076 |
|
|
|
788 |
|
|
|
1,076 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Range of Exercise Prices per
Share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options |
|
$ |
2.20-$7.72 |
|
|
$ |
1.50-$7.72 |
|
|
$ |
2.20-$7.72 |
|
|
$ |
1.50-$7.72 |
|
Warrants |
|
$ |
2.83-$5.80 |
|
|
$ |
1.50-$5.80 |
|
|
$ |
2.83-$5.80 |
|
|
$ |
1.50-$5.80 |
|
Reclassification of Amounts: Certain reclassifications of financial information for the prior
fiscal year have been made to conform to the presentation for the current fiscal year.
8
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements: In October 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards
Board issued Staff Position No. FAS 157-3, Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the
Market for That Asset Is Not Active (FSP 157-3). FSP 157-3 applies to financial assets within
the scope of accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements in accordance
with SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157). FSP 157-3 clarifies the application of
SFAS 157 in determining the fair values of assets or liabilities in a market that is not active.
FSP 157-3 is effective upon issuance, including prior periods for which financial statements have
not been issued. The adoption of FSP 157-3 did not have a material impact on the Companys
Consolidated Financial Statements.
NOTE 2 DEBT
Description. On August 14, 2008, Transcat amended its credit agreement (the Chase Credit
Agreement) with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. The amendment to the Chase Credit Agreement provides
for an increase in the amount available under the revolving credit facility (the Revolving Credit
Facility) from $10 million to $15 million, an extension of the maturity date from November 2009 to
August 2011 and an increase in interest and commitment fees. All other terms were unchanged. As
of September 27, 2008, $4.3 million was outstanding and $10.7 million was available under the Chase
Credit Agreement.
Interest and Commitment Fees. Interest on the Revolving Credit Facility accrues, at Transcats
election, at either a base rate (defined as the highest of prime, a three month certificate of
deposit plus 1%, or the federal funds rate plus 1/2 of 1%) or the London Interbank Offered Rate, in
each case, plus a margin. Commitment fees accrue based on the average daily amount of unused
credit available on the Revolving Credit Facility. Interest and commitment fees are adjusted on a
quarterly basis based upon the Companys calculated leverage ratio, as defined in the Chase Credit
Agreement. The Companys interest rate for the first six months of fiscal year 2009 ranged from
3.0% to 4.6%. If the Chase Credit Agreement, as amended, had been in effect for the entire six
month fiscal period ended September 27, 2008, the Companys interest rate would have ranged from
3.3% to 4.8%.
Covenants. The Chase Credit Agreement has various financial and non-financial covenants with which
the Company must comply, including a fixed charge ratio covenant and a leverage ratio covenant.
The Company was in compliance with all loan covenants and requirements throughout the first six
months of fiscal year 2009.
Other Terms. The Company has pledged all of its U.S. tangible and intangible personal property and
the common stock of Transmation (Canada) Inc. and Westcon as collateral security for the loans made
under the Revolving Credit Facility.
NOTE 3 STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The Transcat, Inc. 2003 Incentive Plan (the 2003 Plan), provides for, among other awards, grants
of restricted stock and stock options to directors, officers and key employees to purchase common
stock at no less than the fair market value at the date of grant. In addition, Transcat maintains
a warrant plan for directors (the Directors Warrant Plan).
Stock Options: Options generally vest over a period of up to four years and expire up to ten
years from the date of grant. Beginning in the second quarter of fiscal year 2008, options granted
to executive officers vest using a graded schedule of 0% in the first year, 20% in each of the
second and third years, and 60% in the fourth year. Prior options granted to executive officers
vested equally over three years. The expense relating to these executive officer options is
recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award.
The following table summarizes the stock options as of and for the first six months ended September
27, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
Of |
|
|
Price Per |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Share |
|
|
Term (in years) |
|
|
Value |
|
Outstanding as of March 29, 2008 |
|
|
656 |
|
|
$ |
5.64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
6.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
2.89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled/Forfeited |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
6.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding as of September 27, 2008 |
|
|
671 |
|
|
|
5.68 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
$ |
1,068 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable as of September 27, 2008 |
|
|
287 |
|
|
|
4.02 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value (the
difference between the Companys closing stock price on the last trading day of the second quarter
of fiscal year 2009 and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money stock options)
that would have been received by the option holders had all option
9
holders exercised their options on September 27, 2008. The amount of aggregate intrinsic value
will change based on the fair market value of the Companys stock.
Total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock options as of September 27, 2008
was $1.2 million, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2 years.
The aggregate intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the first six months of fiscal year
2009 was less than $0.1 million. Cash received from the exercise of options was less than $0.1
million during the first six months of fiscal year 2009.
Restricted Stock: The 2003 Plan also allows the Company to grant stock awards. During the first
six months of fiscal year 2009, the Company granted performance-based restricted stock awards in
place of stock options as a primary component of executive compensation. The performance-based
restricted stock awards vest after three years subject to certain cumulative diluted earnings per
share growth over the eligible three-year period. During the second quarter of fiscal year 2009
and in conjunction with the acquisition of Westcon, the Company modified these awards by increasing
the cumulative diluted earnings per share growth performance condition. The modification did not
have an impact on the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements.
The following table summarizes stock awards as of and for the first six months ended September 27,
2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Number |
|
Price |
|
|
Of Shares |
|
Per Share |
Unvested Balance as of March 29, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Granted |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
6.80 |
|
Vested |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested Balance as of September 27, 2008 |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
6.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expense relating to restricted stock awards, based on fair market value, was less than $0.1
million in the first six months of fiscal year 2009. Unearned compensation totaled $0.3 million as
of September 27, 2008. The number of shares available for future grant under the 2003 Plan totaled
0.3 million at September 27, 2008.
Warrants: Under the Directors Warrant Plan, as amended, warrants have been granted to
non-employee directors to purchase common stock at the fair market value at the date of grant.
Warrants vest over a three year period and expire in five years from the date of grant. All
warrants authorized for issuance pursuant to the Directors Warrant Plan have been granted.
Warrants outstanding on September 27, 2008 continue to vest and be exercisable in accordance with
the terms of the Directors Warrant Plan.
The following table summarizes warrants as of and for the first six months ended September 27,
2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
Of |
|
|
Price Per |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Share |
|
|
Term (in years) |
|
|
Value |
|
Outstanding as of March 29, 2008 |
|
|
99 |
|
|
$ |
3.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
2.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled/Forfeited |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
5.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding as of September 27, 2008 |
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
4.23 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
$ |
179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable as of September 27, 2008 |
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
4.09 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value (the
difference between the Companys closing stock price on the last trading day of the second quarter
of fiscal year 2009 and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money warrants) that
would have been received by the warrant holders had all warrant holders exercised their warrants on
September 27, 2008. The amount of aggregate intrinsic value will change based on the fair market
value of the Companys stock. The aggregate intrinsic value of warrants exercised during the first
six months of fiscal year 2009 was $0.1 million. Cash received from the exercise of warrants was
$0.1 million during the first six months of fiscal year 2009.
10
NOTE 4 SEGMENT INFORMATION
Transcat has two reportable segments: Distribution Products (Product) and Calibration Services
(Service). The Company has no inter-segment sales. The following table presents segment
information for the second quarter and the six months ended September 27, 2008 and September 29,
2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 27, |
|
|
September 29, |
|
|
September 27, |
|
|
September 29, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Net Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Sales |
|
$ |
12,954 |
|
|
$ |
11,219 |
|
|
$ |
25,265 |
|
|
$ |
22,146 |
|
Service Revenue |
|
|
5,656 |
|
|
|
5,406 |
|
|
|
11,198 |
|
|
|
10,669 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
18,610 |
|
|
|
16,625 |
|
|
|
36,463 |
|
|
|
32,815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product |
|
|
3,386 |
|
|
|
3,130 |
|
|
|
6,748 |
|
|
|
6,191 |
|
Service |
|
|
1,188 |
|
|
|
1,116 |
|
|
|
2,351 |
|
|
|
2,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
4,574 |
|
|
|
4,246 |
|
|
|
9,099 |
|
|
|
8,473 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product |
|
|
2,321 |
|
|
|
2,217 |
|
|
|
4,735 |
|
|
|
4,580 |
|
Service |
|
|
1,514 |
|
|
|
1,435 |
|
|
|
3,237 |
|
|
|
2,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
3,835 |
|
|
|
3,652 |
|
|
|
7,972 |
|
|
|
7,430 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income |
|
|
739 |
|
|
|
594 |
|
|
|
1,127 |
|
|
|
1,043 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated Amounts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Expense, net |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
353 |
|
Provision for Income Taxes |
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
430 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
309 |
|
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
469 |
|
|
|
611 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
430 |
|
|
$ |
194 |
|
|
$ |
658 |
|
|
$ |
432 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 5 ACQUISITION
On August 14, 2008, Transcat, through its wholly-owned subsidiary Transcat Acquisition, acquired
Westcon pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger Agreement) with Westcon and its
sole stockholder. Westcon is a distributor of professional grade test and measurement instruments
and a provider of calibration and repair services to customers located primarily in the western
region of the United States.
Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, Westcon merged with and into Transcat Acquisition. Concurrent
with the closing of the merger, Transcat Acquisitions name was changed to Westcon.
Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, Transcat paid an aggregate purchase price of approximately
$6.9 million, which was paid in a combination of the issuance of 150,000 shares of Transcat common
stock valued at approximately $1.1 million and approximately $5.8 million in cash. A portion of
the cash purchase price, aggregating $0.5 million, was distributed to satisfy certain debt
obligations of Westcon, with the remainder being paid to the sole stockholder. An additional
contingent payment of up to $1.4 million is subject to holdback restrictions and is intended to
secure the obligations of Westcon and the sole stockholder for post-closing adjustments,
reimbursement and indemnification under the terms of the Merger Agreement. This contingent payment
is expected to be recorded as additional purchase price at the time the payment is certain.
In addition, Transcat and the sole stockholder entered into an Earn Out Agreement dated as of the
closing of the merger. This agreement provides that the sole stockholder may be entitled to
certain contingent earn out payments subject to continued employment and Westcon achieving certain
post-closing gross profit and revenue targets. These potential future payments are expected to be
recorded as compensation expense in the period earned.
11
The following is a summary of the preliminary purchase price allocation:
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase Price Paid: |
|
|
|
|
Cash Paid to Seller at Closing |
|
$ |
4,216 |
|
Westcon Debt Paid by Transcat at Closing |
|
|
466 |
|
Fair Value of Common Stock Issued |
|
|
1,113 |
|
Cash Paid to Seller in November 2008 |
|
|
1,017 |
|
Direct Acquisition Costs |
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Purchase Price |
|
$ |
6,928 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation of Purchase Price: |
|
|
|
|
Intangible Asset Customer Base |
|
$ |
1,206 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
4,498 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,704 |
|
Plus: Current Assets |
|
|
1,675 |
|
Non-Current Assets |
|
|
274 |
|
Less: Current Liabilities |
|
|
(658 |
) |
Non-Current Liabilities |
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total Purchase Price |
|
$ |
6,928 |
|
|
|
|
|
Assets and liabilities of the acquired business are recorded under the purchase method of
accounting at their estimated fair values as of the date of acquisition. Goodwill represents costs
in excess of fair values assigned to the underlying net assets of the acquired business. Other
intangible assets, namely customer base, represent an allocation of purchase price to identifiable
intangible assets of the acquired business. Intangible assets are being amortized for financial
reporting purposes on an accelerated basis over the estimated useful life of 10 years. Goodwill
and the intangible assets are not deductible for tax purposes.
The primary reasons for the Companys acquisition of Westcon and the principal factors that
contribute to the recognition of goodwill are the strengthening of the Companys presence in the
western region of the United States and/or the synergies and related cost savings gained from the
integration of the acquired operation.
The results of operations of Westcon are included in Transcats consolidated operating results as
of the date the business was acquired. The following unaudited pro forma results assume the
acquisition occurred at the beginning of each period presented. The pro forma results do not
purport to represent what the Companys results of operations actually would have been if the
transactions set forth had occurred on the date indicated or what the Companys results of
operations will be in future periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
Second Quarter Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
September 27, |
|
September 29, |
|
September 27, |
|
September 29, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Net Revenue |
|
$ |
19,614 |
|
|
$ |
19,731 |
|
|
$ |
39,613 |
|
|
$ |
37,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
404 |
|
|
$ |
364 |
|
|
$ |
514 |
|
|
$ |
452 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Earnings Per Share |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted Earnings Per Share |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
NOTE 6 COMMITMENTS
Concurrent with the acquisition of Westcon, the Company entered into an agreement to lease property
in Portland, Oregon for Westcons calibration laboratory. The facility, which is owned by an
officer of the Company, the former sole stockholder of Westcon, is being leased under a
non-cancelable operating lease over a three year period commencing on the acquisition date. The
minimum future annual rental payments related to this lease are approximately $0.1 million per year.
12
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Forward-Looking Statements. This report and, in particular, the Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section of this report, contains
forward-looking statements as defined by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
These include statements concerning expectations, estimates, and projections about the industry,
management beliefs and assumptions of Transcat, Inc. (Transcat, we, us, or our). Words
such as anticipates, expects, intends, plans, believes, seeks, estimates, and
variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking
statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to certain
risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to forecast. Therefore, our actual results
may materially differ from those expressed or forecasted in any such forward-looking statements.
When considering these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, you should keep in mind the cautionary
statements elsewhere in this report and in any documents incorporated herein by reference. New
risks and uncertainties arise from time to time and we cannot predict those events or how they may
affect us. For a more detailed discussion of the risks and uncertainties that may affect
Transcats operating and financial results and its ability to achieve its financial objectives,
interested parties should review the Risk Factors sections in Transcats reports filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended March 29, 2008. We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking
statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Accounts Receivable: Accounts receivable represent receivables from customers in the ordinary
course of business. These amounts are recorded net of the allowance for doubtful accounts and
returns in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The allowance for doubtful accounts is based upon the
expected collectibility of accounts receivable. We apply a specific formula to our accounts
receivable aging, which may be adjusted on a specific account basis where the specific formula may
not appropriately reserve for loss exposure. After all attempts to collect a receivable have
failed, the receivable is written-off against the allowance for doubtful accounts. The returns
reserve is calculated based upon the historical rate of returns applied to sales over a specific
timeframe. The returns reserve will increase or decrease as a result of changes in the level of
sales and/or the historical rate of returns.
Stock-Based Compensation. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123
(revised 2004), Share-Based Payment, we measure the cost of services received in exchange for all
equity awards granted, including stock options, warrants and restricted stock, based on the fair
market value of the award as of the grant date. We use the modified prospective application method
to record compensation cost related to unvested stock awards as of March 25, 2006 by recognizing
the unamortized grant date fair value of these awards over the remaining service periods of those
awards with no change in historical reported earnings. Awards granted after March 25, 2006 are
valued at fair value and are recognized on a straight line basis over the service periods of each
award. Excess tax benefits from the exercise of stock awards are presented in the Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows as a financing activity. Excess tax benefits are realized benefits from
tax deductions for exercised awards in excess of the deferred tax asset attributable to stock-based
compensation costs for such awards. We did not have any stock-based compensation costs capitalized
as part of an asset. We estimate forfeiture rates based on our historical experience.
Options generally vest over a period of up to four years and expire up to ten years from the date
of grant. Beginning in the second quarter of fiscal year 2008, options granted to executive
officers vest using a graded schedule of 0% in the first year, 20% in each of the second and third
years, and 60% in the fourth year. Prior options granted to executive officers vested equally over
three years. The expense relating to these executive officer options is recognized on a
straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award.
During the first six months of fiscal year 2009, we granted performance-based restricted stock
awards in place of options as a primary component of executive compensation. The performance-based
restricted stock awards vest after three years subject to certain cumulative diluted earnings per
share growth over the eligible three-year period. During the second quarter of fiscal year 2009
and in conjunction with the acquisition of Westcon, we modified these awards by increasing the
cumulative diluted earnings per share growth performance condition. The modification did not have
an impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Revenue Recognition. Product sales are recorded when a products title and risk of loss transfers
to the customer. We recognize the majority of our service revenue based upon when the calibration
or repair activity is performed and then shipped and/or delivered to the customer. Some of our
service revenue is generated from managing customers calibration programs in which we recognize
revenue in equal amounts at fixed intervals. We generally invoice our customers for freight,
shipping, and handling charges. Provisions for customer returns are provided for in the period the
related revenues are recorded based upon historical data.
13
Reclassification of Amounts: Certain reclassifications of financial information for the prior
fiscal year have been made to conform to the presentation for the current fiscal year.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table sets forth, for the second quarter and the first six months of fiscal years
2009 and 2008, the components of our Consolidated Statements of Operations as a percentage of our
net revenue (calculated on dollars in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
Second Quarter Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
September 27, |
|
September 29, |
|
September 27, |
|
September 29, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
As a Percentage of Net Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Sales |
|
|
69.6 |
% |
|
|
67.5 |
% |
|
|
69.3 |
% |
|
|
67.5 |
% |
Service Revenue |
|
|
30.4 |
% |
|
|
32.5 |
% |
|
|
30.7 |
% |
|
|
32.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenue |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Gross Profit |
|
|
26.1 |
% |
|
|
27.9 |
% |
|
|
26.7 |
% |
|
|
28.0 |
% |
Service Gross Profit |
|
|
21.0 |
% |
|
|
20.6 |
% |
|
|
21.0 |
% |
|
|
21.4 |
% |
Total Gross Profit |
|
|
24.6 |
% |
|
|
25.5 |
% |
|
|
25.0 |
% |
|
|
25.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, Marketing and Warehouse Expenses |
|
|
11.4 |
% |
|
|
12.1 |
% |
|
|
12.9 |
% |
|
|
13.2 |
% |
Administrative Expenses |
|
|
9.2 |
% |
|
|
9.8 |
% |
|
|
8.9 |
% |
|
|
9.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Operating Expenses |
|
|
20.6 |
% |
|
|
21.9 |
% |
|
|
21.8 |
% |
|
|
22.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income |
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
3.6 |
% |
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
Other Expense, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Other Expense |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Before Income Taxes |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
2.1 |
% |
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
Provision for Income Taxes |
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
|
2.3 |
% |
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
SECOND QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 27, 2008 COMPARED TO SECOND QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 29, 2007
(dollars in thousands):
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
September 27, |
|
|
September 29, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Net Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Sales |
|
$ |
12,954 |
|
|
$ |
11,219 |
|
Service Revenue |
|
|
5,656 |
|
|
|
5,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
18,610 |
|
|
$ |
16,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue increased $2.0 million, or 11.9%, from the second quarter of fiscal year 2008 to the
second quarter of fiscal year 2009.
Our product net sales results accounted for 69.6% of our total net revenue in the second quarter of
fiscal year 2009 and 67.5% of our total net revenue in the second quarter of fiscal year 2008. For
the second quarter of fiscal year 2009, product sales increased $1.7 million or 15.5% from the
second quarter of fiscal year 2008. Product sales by Westcon, since the date of the acquisition,
accounted for $0.9 million of this increase. Exclusive of Westcon, our product sales increased
7.6% over the second quarter of fiscal year 2008. Our fiscal years 2009 and 2008 product sales
growth in relation to prior fiscal year quarter comparisons is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2009 |
|
|
FY 2008 |
|
|
Q2 |
|
Q1 |
|
|
Q4 |
|
Q3 |
|
Q2 |
|
Q1 |
Product Sales Growth (Decline)
|
|
|
15.5 |
% |
|
|
12.7 |
% |
|
|
|
(2.4 |
%) |
|
|
5.8 |
% |
|
|
13.6 |
% |
|
|
3.7 |
% |
Our average product sales per business day increased to $206 in the second quarter of fiscal year
2009, compared with $178 in the second quarter of fiscal year 2008 primarily due to a combination
of organic growth and the addition of Westcon in the second quarter of fiscal 2009. Our product
sales per business day for each fiscal quarter during the fiscal years 2009 and 2008 are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2009 |
|
|
FY 2008 |
|
|
Q2 |
|
Q1 |
|
|
Q4 |
|
Q3 |
|
Q2 |
|
Q1 |
Product Sales Per Business Day |
|
$ |
206 |
|
|
$ |
192 |
|
|
|
$ |
197 |
|
|
$ |
213 |
|
|
$ |
178 |
|
|
$ |
171 |
|
In the second quarter of fiscal year 2009, our direct distribution channel grew 5.6%
year-over-year. The primary drivers of this growth were incremental sales associated with Westcon
and increased international sales. Organic sales to our direct U.S. customers were relatively
consistent year-over-year, while sales to Canadian customers declined. As a result of the
changing geographical customer mix from more profitable Canadian customers to less profitable
international customers, our direct distribution channel gross profit percentage decreased 120
basis points from the second quarter of fiscal year 2008 to the second quarter of fiscal year 2009.
Within our reseller channel, sales increased 77.6% for the quarter with a slight improvement in
gross profit percentage. Approximately 32.5% of the reseller sales dollar growth is attributable
to Westcon. As for our organic growth, we believe resellers continue to utilize us for our
extensive availability to provide a broad range of new and existing products from within our
inventory. As the depth of our products increases, we anticipate continued growth within this
channel. The following table reflects the percentage of net sales and the approximate gross profit
percentage for significant distribution product channels for the second quarter of fiscal years
2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2009 Second Quarter |
|
|
FY 2008 Second Quarter |
|
|
Percent of |
|
Gross |
|
|
Percent of |
|
Gross |
|
|
Net Sales |
|
Profit % (1) |
|
|
Net Sales |
|
Profit % (1) |
Direct |
|
|
77.6 |
% |
|
|
25.8 |
% |
|
|
|
84.9 |
% |
|
|
27.0 |
% |
Reseller |
|
|
20.8 |
% |
|
|
18.2 |
% |
|
|
|
13.5 |
% |
|
|
18.0 |
% |
Freight Billed to Customers |
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Calculated as net sales less purchase costs divided by net sales. |
15
Customer product orders include orders for products that we routinely stock in our inventory,
customized products, and other products ordered less frequently, which we do not stock. Pending
product shipments are primarily backorders, but also include products that are requested to be
calibrated in our calibration laboratories prior to shipment, orders required to be shipped
complete, and orders required to be shipped at a future date. Our total pending product shipments
for the second quarter of fiscal year 2009 decreased by approximately $0.3 million, or 17.2% from
the second quarter of fiscal year 2008. This decrease is driven by a 21.1% decrease in the
outstanding backorders balance, which can be attributed to a greater availability of products
through our increased inventory levels. The following table reflects the percentage of total
pending product shipments that are backorders at the end of the second quarter of fiscal year 2009
and our historical trend of total pending product shipments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2009 |
|
|
FY 2008 |
|
|
Q2 |
|
Q1 |
|
|
Q4 |
|
Q3 |
|
Q2 |
|
Q1 |
Total Pending Product Shipments |
|
$ |
1,398 |
|
|
$ |
1,366 |
|
|
|
$ |
1,419 |
|
|
$ |
1,411 |
|
|
$ |
1,689 |
|
|
$ |
1,678 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Pending Product Shipments
That are Backorders |
|
|
70.7 |
% |
|
|
74.7 |
% |
|
|
|
81.5 |
% |
|
|
78.1 |
% |
|
|
74.1 |
% |
|
|
81.0 |
% |
Service revenue increased $0.3 million, or 4.6%, from the second quarter of fiscal year 2008 to the
second quarter of fiscal year 2009. Westcon contributed $0.2 million in service revenue in the
second quarter of fiscal year 2009. Organic service revenue was relatively flat in the second
quarter of fiscal year 2009 compared with the same period of the prior fiscal year. Service
revenue in the second quarter of fiscal year 2009 was negatively impacted by Hurricane Ike. In
addition to the forced two week shutdown of our largest calibration laboratory and repair center in
Houston during the storm and its aftermath, many of our customers in that area postponed or
cancelled expected calibration service requests. Additionally, repair service requests, which can
be unpredictable from quarter-to-quarter, were down 12.3% year-over-year.
The timing
of calibration orders and service segment expenses can vary on a quarter-to-quarter basis based
on the nature of a customers business and calibration requirements. In general, a trailing twelve
month trend provides a better indication of the progress of this segment. Service revenue for the
twelve months ended September 27, 2008 was $23.4 million, up 7.7% when compared with $21.8 million
for the twelve months ended September 29, 2007. Our fiscal years 2009 and 2008 service revenue
growth in relation to prior fiscal year quarter comparisons is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2009 |
|
|
FY 2008 |
|
|
Q2 |
|
Q1 |
|
|
Q4 |
|
Q3 |
|
Q2 |
|
Q1 |
Service Revenue Growth |
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
|
5.3 |
% |
|
|
|
10.6 |
% |
|
|
9.9 |
% |
|
|
8.6 |
% |
|
|
5.6 |
% |
Within the calibration industry, there is a broad array of measurement disciplines making it costly
and inefficient for any one provider to invest the needed capital for facilities, equipment and
uniquely trained personnel necessary to perform all calibrations in-house. Our strategy has been
to focus our investments in the core electrical, temperature, pressure and dimensional disciplines,
and we have historically subcontracted 15% to 20% of our customers equipment to outside vendors.
In the second quarter of fiscal year 2009, 78.5% of service revenue was generated by our staff of
technicians while 18.8% was subcontracted to outside vendors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2009 Second |
|
|
|
FY 2008 Second |
|
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
Service |
|
|
Service |
|
|
|
Service |
|
|
Service |
|
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Revenue |
|
In-House |
|
$ |
4,441 |
|
|
|
78.5 |
% |
|
|
$ |
4,266 |
|
|
|
78.9 |
% |
Outsourced |
|
|
1,065 |
|
|
|
18.8 |
% |
|
|
|
995 |
|
|
|
18.4 |
% |
Freight Billed to
Customers |
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
% |
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
5,656 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
$ |
5,406 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
Gross Profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
September 27, |
|
|
September 29, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Gross Profit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product |
|
$ |
3,386 |
|
|
$ |
3,130 |
|
Service |
|
|
1,188 |
|
|
|
1,116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
4,574 |
|
|
$ |
4,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit dollars increased 7.7% from the second quarter of fiscal year 2008 to the second
quarter of fiscal year 2009. As a percentage of total net revenue, total gross profit declined 90
basis points for the same time period.
Gross profit for our products segment may be influenced by a number of factors including market
channel mix, product mix and discounts to customers. Product gross profit in the second quarter
of fiscal year 2009 was $3.4 million, or 26.1% of total product sales, compared with $3.1 million,
or 27.9% of total product sales, in the second quarter of fiscal year 2008. The reduction in gross
profit percentage was attributable to higher international and reseller sales, which have lower
profit margin potential, combined with lower sales to Canadian customers, which typically have
higher profit margins. The following table reflects the quarterly historical trend of our product
gross profit as a percent of total product sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2009 |
|
|
FY 2008 |
|
|
Q2 |
|
Q1 |
|
|
Q4 |
|
Q3 |
|
Q2 |
|
Q1 |
Product Gross Profit % (1) |
|
|
24.2 |
% |
|
|
23.9 |
% |
|
|
|
24.1 |
% |
|
|
25.1 |
% |
|
|
25.8 |
% |
|
|
24.6 |
% |
Other Income % (2) |
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
|
3.4 |
% |
|
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
2.1 |
% |
|
|
3.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Gross Profit % |
|
|
26.1 |
% |
|
|
27.3 |
% |
|
|
|
27.1 |
% |
|
|
28.1 |
% |
|
|
27.9 |
% |
|
|
28.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Calculated as net sales less purchase costs divided by net sales. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes vendor rebates, cooperative advertising income, freight billed to customers,
freight expenses, and direct shipping costs. |
Service gross profit in the second quarter of fiscal year 2009 was $1.2 million, or 21.0% of total
service revenue, compared with $1.1 million, or 20.6% of total service revenue, in the same period
of the prior fiscal year. Cost control measures were implemented in the quarter to compensate for
the lower than expected revenue growth, resulting in relatively flat service gross profit. In
general, our gross profit percentage for calibration services fluctuates on a quarterly basis due
to the seasonality of our revenues (our fiscal fourth quarter is generally our strongest) and the
timing of operating costs associated with our calibration laboratory operations. The following
table reflects our service gross profit growth in relation to prior fiscal year quarters:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2009 |
|
|
FY 2008 |
|
|
Q2 |
|
Q1 |
|
|
Q4 |
|
Q3 |
|
Q2 |
|
Q1 |
Service Gross
Profit Dollar Growth
(Decline) |
|
|
6.5 |
% |
|
|
(0.3 |
%) |
|
|
|
32.5 |
% |
|
|
14.0 |
% |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
Operating Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
September 27, |
|
|
September 29, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Operating Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, Marketing and Warehouse |
|
$ |
2,122 |
|
|
$ |
2,018 |
|
Administrative |
|
|
1,713 |
|
|
|
1,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,835 |
|
|
$ |
3,652 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses increased $0.2 million, or 5.0%, from the second quarter of fiscal year 2008 to
the second quarter of fiscal year 2009. Operating expenses as a percent of total revenue decreased
from 22.0% in the second quarter of fiscal year 2008 to 20.6% in the second quarter fiscal year
2009. Selling, Marketing and Warehouse expenses increased to $2.1 million
17
in the second quarter of fiscal year 2009 compared with $2.0 million in the same period of the
prior fiscal year, but were down from $2.6 million in the first quarter of fiscal year 2009.
Administrative expenses were $1.7 million for the second quarter of fiscal year 2009, which
included $0.1 million in expenses for Westcon, compared with $1.6 million for the second quarter of
fiscal year 2008 and $1.5 million in the first quarter of fiscal year 2009. Reduced expenses
related to variable and stock-based compensation had a positive impact on both selling and
administrative expenses compared with the first quarter of fiscal year 2009.
Other Expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
September 27, |
|
|
September 29, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Other Expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense |
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
Other Expense, net |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
$ |
238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense in the second quarter of fiscal year 2009 was consistent with the interest expense
in the second quarter of fiscal year 2008. Other expenses, consisting primarily of foreign
currency net losses, decreased due to a reduction in our intercompany balances.
Taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter Ended |
|
|
September 27, |
|
September 29, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Provision for Income Taxes |
|
$ |
277 |
|
|
$ |
162 |
|
In the second quarter of fiscal year 2009, we recognized a $0.3 million provision for income taxes,
compared to a $0.2 million provision in the second quarter of fiscal year 2008, as a result of an
increase in income before income taxes. We continue to evaluate our tax provision on a quarterly
basis and make adjustments, as deemed necessary, to our effective tax rate given changes in facts
and circumstances expected for the entire fiscal year.
18
SIX MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 27, 2008 COMPARED TO SIX MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 29, 2007
(dollars in
thousands):
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 27, |
|
|
September 29, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Net Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Sales |
|
$ |
25,265 |
|
|
$ |
22,146 |
|
Service Revenue |
|
|
11,198 |
|
|
|
10,669 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
36,463 |
|
|
$ |
32,815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue increased $3.6 million, or 11.1%, from the first six months of fiscal year 2008 to the
first six months of fiscal year 2009.
Our product net sales, which accounted for 69.3% of our total net revenue in the first six months
of fiscal year 2009 and 67.5% of our total net revenue in the first six months of fiscal year 2008,
have increased 14.1%. Exclusive of Westcon, product sales in the first six months of fiscal year
2009 were $24.4 million, a 10.1% increase compared to the $22.1 million in product sales in the
first six months of fiscal year 2008. Total sales within our direct distribution channel increased
7.7% in the first six months of fiscal year 2009, with organic sales contributing 5.0% of this
increase. This increase in organic sales is a result of growth in sales to our U.S. and
international customers, partially offset by a decline in sales to our Canadian customers. The
decline in Canadian sales, our most profitable channel, and lower margin sales by Westcon have had
a negative impact on our overall direct channel gross margin. Our direct channels gross profit as
a percent of product sales has declined 110 basis points from the first six months of fiscal year
2008 to the first six months of fiscal year 2009.
Within our reseller channel, we experienced a 52.5% increase in total sales and a 40.2% increase in
organic sales during the first six months of fiscal year 2009. We attribute this growth to our
ability to provide resellers an extensive availability to a broad range of new and existing
products from within our inventory. Our reseller sales growth did not come at the expense of
declining profit margins within the channel. We experienced a profit margin improvement of 100
basis points in the first six months of fiscal year 2009 compared to the first six months of fiscal
year 2008. The following table provides the percentage of net sales and the approximate gross
profit percentage for significant distribution product channels for the first six months of fiscal
years 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
September 27, 2008 |
|
|
September 29, 2007 |
|
|
Percent of |
|
Gross |
|
|
Percent of |
|
Gross |
|
|
Net Sales |
|
Profit % (1) |
|
|
Net Sales |
|
Profit % (1) |
Direct |
|
|
79.7 |
% |
|
|
25.5 |
% |
|
|
|
84.4 |
% |
|
|
26.6 |
% |
Reseller |
|
|
18.7 |
% |
|
|
17.9 |
% |
|
|
|
14.0 |
% |
|
|
16.9 |
% |
Freight Billed to Customers |
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Calculated as net sales less purchase costs divided by net sales. |
Service revenue increased $0.5 million, or 5.0%, from the first six months of fiscal year 2008 to
the first six months of fiscal year 2009. Organic service revenue growth for the same time period
was 3.0%. Service revenue in the first six months of fiscal year 2009 was negatively impacted by
Hurricane Ike, which occurred in our fiscal second quarter, and a 13.7% decline in our repair
business. In addition, within any six month period, while we may add new customers, we may also
have customers from the prior year whose calibrations may not repeat during the same fiscal period
for any number of factors. Among those factors are the variations in the timing of customer
periodic calibrations on equipment, customer capital expenditures and customer outsourcing
decisions.
19
Gross Profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 27, |
|
|
September 29, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Gross Profit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product |
|
$ |
6,748 |
|
|
$ |
6,191 |
|
Service |
|
|
2,351 |
|
|
|
2,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
9,099 |
|
|
$ |
8,473 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit dollars increased 7.4% from the first six months of fiscal year 2008 to the
first six months of fiscal year 2009. As a percentage of total net revenue, total gross profit
declined 80 basis points for the same time period.
Product gross profit increased $0.6 million, or 9.0%, from the first six months of fiscal year 2008
to the first six months of fiscal year 2009, primarily because of a 14.1% increase in product net
sales. As a percent of product net sales, product gross profit decreased 130 basis points for the
same time period. This is primarily attributable to higher international and reseller sales, which
have lower profit potential, combined with lower sales to Canadian customers, which typically have
higher profit margins.
Service gross profit increased approximately $0.1 million, or 3.0%, from the first six months of
fiscal year 2008 to the first six months of fiscal year 2009. As a percent of service revenue,
service gross profit decreased 40 basis points from the first six months of fiscal year 2008
compared to the first six months of fiscal year 2009. In the first six months of fiscal year
2009, cost control measures were put into place to maintain relatively consistent service gross
profit percentages, despite lower than expected revenue growth.
Operating Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 27, |
|
|
September 29, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Operating Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, Marketing and Warehouse |
|
$ |
4,717 |
|
|
$ |
4,323 |
|
Administrative |
|
|
3,255 |
|
|
|
3,107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
7,972 |
|
|
$ |
7,430 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses increased $0.5 million, or 7.3%, from the first six months of fiscal year 2008
to the first six months of fiscal year 2009. Selling, Marketing and Warehouse expenses increased
$0.4 million, or 9.1%, as a result of our strategic decision to invest in our sales and marketing
infrastructure in order to drive future revenue growth. In doing so, we have added breadth and
depth to our sales management team and further expanded our coverage of accounts nationally.
Administrative expenses increased $0.1 million, or 4.8%, from the first six months of fiscal year
2008 to the first six months of fiscal year 2009.
Other Expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 27, |
|
|
September 29, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Other Expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense |
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
$ |
63 |
|
Other Expense |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
39 |
|
|
$ |
353 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense decreased slightly from the first six months of fiscal year 2008 to the first six
months of fiscal year 2009 as a result of our reduced debt prior to our acquisition of Westcon.
Other expenses, consisting primarily of foreign currency net losses, decreased due to a reduction
in our intercompany balances.
20
Taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
September 27, |
|
September 29, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Provision for Income Taxes |
|
$ |
430 |
|
|
$ |
258 |
|
In the first six months of fiscal year 2009, we recognized a $0.4 million provision for income
taxes, compared to a $0.3 million provision in the first six months of fiscal year 2008, as a
result of an increase in income before income taxes. We continue to evaluate our tax provision on
a quarterly basis and make adjustments, as deemed necessary, to our effective tax rate given
changes in facts and circumstances expected for the entire fiscal year.
21
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
As of September 27, 2008, cash along with projected operating cash flows are expected to support
our normal business operations and capital purchases for the foreseeable future.
Cash Flows. The following table is a summary of our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
September 27, |
|
September 29, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Cash Provided by (Used in): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Activities |
|
$ |
1,003 |
|
|
$ |
2,222 |
|
Investing Activities |
|
|
(5,212 |
) |
|
|
(999 |
) |
Financing Activities |
|
|
4,186 |
|
|
|
(1,407 |
) |
Operating Activities: Cash provided by operating activities for the first six months of
fiscal year 2009 was $1.0 million compared to $2.2 million of cash provided by operating activities
in the first six months of fiscal year 2008. Significant working capital fluctuations were as
follows:
|
|
|
Inventory/Accounts Payable: An aggressive product sales and marketing campaign in
affiliation with one of our primary test and measurement instrument suppliers and
continued efforts to maintain on-hand inventory for our top-selling items contributed
to our use of approximately $0.3 million of operating cash during the first six months
of fiscal year 2009 for inventory and accounts payable compared
to $0.9 million of cash provided in the first six months of fiscal year 2008. |
|
|
|
|
Receivables: We continue to generate positive operating cash flow and maintain
strong collections on our accounts receivable. The following table illustrates our
days sales outstanding from fiscal year 2008 to fiscal year 2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 27, |
|
September 29, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Net Sales, for the last two fiscal months |
|
$ |
13,517 |
|
|
$ |
12,010 |
|
Accounts Receivable, net |
|
$ |
9,105 |
|
|
$ |
7,874 |
|
Days Sales Outstanding (based on 60 days) |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
Investing Activities: During the second quarter of fiscal year 2009, we used approximately $4.6
million of cash to purchase Westcon. See Note 5 of our Consolidated Financial Statements in this
report for more information on the acquisition. In addition, during the first six months of fiscal
year 2009, approximately $0.6 million of cash was used for the purchase of property and equipment
primarily for the expansion of capacity and capabilities within our calibration laboratories.
Financing Activities: The $4.1 million of cash provided by financing activities resulted primarily
from borrowings to acquire Westcon of $4.6 million, offset by repayments on the Revolving Credit
Facility using cash provided by operating activities.
Debt. On August 14, 2008, we amended our Chase Credit Agreement. The amendment provides for an
increase in the amount available under the Revolving Credit Facility from $10 million to $15
million, an extension of the maturity date from November 2009 to August 2011 and an increase in
interest and commitment fees. All other terms were unchanged. As of September 27, 2008, $4.3
million was outstanding and $10.7 million was available under the Chase Credit Agreement.
See Note 2 of our Consolidated Financial Statements in this report for more information on our
debt. See Item 3, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk, of this report for a
discussion of interest rates on our debt.
OUTLOOK
As we enter what are typically our strongest sales quarters, we anticipate accelerated growth rates
in both of our business segments. Our growth objectives are dependent on new product launches from
our strategic partners, our direct marketing efforts including our annual Master Catalog, and
investments in our sales personnel. However, we remain cautious due to the effects the economy and
credit markets may have on our customers and their purchase decisions. We expect operating and
pre-tax income to exceed prior fiscal year comparisons, with future net income comparisons
negatively impacted by a $0.8 million benefit from the reversal of a deferred tax asset valuation
allowance in the third quarter of fiscal year 2008. As we
22
integrate Westcon into our business systems and processes, we believe it will expand our revenue
growth opportunities during the remainder of fiscal year 2009.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
INTEREST RATES
Our exposure to changes in interest rates results from our borrowing activities. In the event
interest rates were to move by 1%, our yearly interest expense would increase or decrease by less
than $0.1 million assuming our average-borrowing levels remained constant. On September 27, 2008
and September 29, 2007, we had no hedging arrangements in place to limit our exposure to upward
movements in interest rates. As of September 27, 2008, $4.3 million was outstanding and $10.7
million was available under the Chase Credit Agreement.
Under our Chase Credit Agreement described in Note 2 of our Consolidated Financial Statements in
this report, interest is adjusted on a quarterly basis based upon our calculated leverage ratio.
Our interest rate for the first six months of fiscal year 2009 ranged from 3.0% to 4.6%.
FOREIGN CURRENCY
Approximately 90% of our total net revenues for the first six months of fiscal years 2009 and 2008
were denominated in United States dollars, with the remainder denominated in Canadian dollars. A
10% change in the value of the Canadian dollar to the United States dollar would impact our total
net revenues by less than 1%. We monitor the relationship between the United States and Canadian
currencies on a continuous basis and adjust sales prices for products and services sold in Canadian
dollars as we believe to be appropriate.
We periodically enter into foreign exchange forward contracts to reduce the risk that our earnings
would be adversely affected by changes in currency exchange rates. The contracts are accounted for
in accordance with SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. We
do not apply hedge accounting and therefore, the change in the fair value of the contracts, which
totaled less than $0.1 million during the second quarter and the first six months of fiscal year
2009, was recognized in current earnings as a component of other expense in the Consolidated
Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income. The change in the fair value of the contracts
is offset by the change in fair value on the underlying accounts receivable being hedged. On
September 27, 2008, we had a foreign exchange forward contract, set to mature in October 2008,
outstanding in the notional amount of $0.3 million. We do not use hedging arrangements for
speculative purposes.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Our principal executive officer and our
principal financial officer evaluated our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly
report. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and our principal financial
officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of such date.
(b) Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting. There has been no change in our
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the last fiscal quarter covered by
this quarterly report (our second fiscal quarter) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. As disclosed in this
report, we acquired Westcon, Inc. on August 14, 2008 and we are in the process of assessing a plan
of integration for its operations.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
You should carefully consider the following risk factors in evaluating us and our business. These
risks are not exclusive, and additional risks to which we are subject include, but are not limited
to, the risks of our businesses described elsewhere in this report and in other documents we file
with the SEC, including our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 29, 2008.
If any of the following risks occur, our business, financial condition and operating results could
be materially adversely affected.
23
Our Acquisitions Or Future Acquisition Efforts, Which Are Important To Our Growth, May Not Be
Successful, Which May Limit Our Growth Or Adversely Affect Our Results Of Operations And Financial
Condition
Acquisitions have been an important part of our development to date. During our second quarter of
fiscal year 2009, we acquired Westcon. As part of our business strategy, we may make additional
acquisitions of companies that could complement or expand our business, augment our market
coverage, provide us with important relationships or otherwise offer us growth opportunities. If
we identify an appropriate acquisition candidate, we may not be able to negotiate successfully the
terms of or finance the acquisition. In addition, we cannot assure you that we will be able to
integrate the operations of our acquisitions, including Westcon, without encountering difficulties,
including unanticipated costs, possible difficulty in retaining customers and supplier or
manufacturing relationships, failure to retain key employees, the diversion of our managements
attention or failure to integrate our information and accounting systems. As a result of our
recent acquisition of Westcon and future acquisitions, we may not realize the revenues and cost
savings that we expect to achieve or that would justify the acquisition investments, and we may
incur costs in excess of what we anticipate. To effectively manage our expected future growth, we
must continue to successfully manage our integration of the companies that we acquire and continue
to improve our operational systems, internal procedures, accounts receivable and management,
financial and operational controls. If we fail in any of these areas, our business growth and
results of operations could be adversely affected.
Our Recently Completed Acquisition Of Westcon Makes Evaluating Our Operating Results Difficult
Given The Significance To Our Operations, And Our Historical Results Do Not Give You An Accurate
Indication Of How We Will Perform In The Future
Our
historical results of operations do not give effect for a full fiscal year to our acquisition
of Westcon. Accordingly, our historical financial information does
not necessarily reflect what
our financial position, operating results and cash flows will be in
the future as a result of this
acquisition, or give you an accurate indication of how we will
perform in the future.
The Financing Of Any Future Acquisitions We Make May Result In
Dilution To Your Stock Ownership
And/Or Could Increase Our Leverage And Our Risk Of Defaulting On Our Bank Debt
Our business strategy includes expansion into new markets and enhancement of our position in
existing markets, including through acquisitions. In order to successfully complete targeted
acquisitions, we may issue additional equity securities that could dilute your stock ownership. We
may also incur additional debt if we acquire another company, which could significantly increase
our leverage and our risk of default under our existing credit facility. For example, in financing
our recent Westcon acquisition we issued 150,000 shares of our common stock in a private placement
to Westcons sole stockholder and incurred approximately $4.6 million of additional debt under our
amended credit facility to fund a portion of the purchase price.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
On August 19, 2008, our shareholders voted on the proposals set forth below at the annual meeting.
Proposal 1:
Richard J. Harrison, Harvey J. Palmer and John T. Smith were elected as directors of the Company,
each to serve until the annual meeting of shareholders to be held in 2011. The number of shares
that voted for the election of each director nominee and the number of shares that withheld
authority to vote for each director nominee are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nominees |
|
Votes For |
|
Votes Withheld |
Richard J. Harrison |
|
|
6,921,670 |
|
|
|
43,721 |
|
Harvey J. Palmer |
|
|
6,919,670 |
|
|
|
45,721 |
|
John T. Smith |
|
|
6,625,699 |
|
|
|
339,692 |
|
The other directors, whose terms of office continued after the meeting, are Francis R. Bradley,
Charles P. Hadeed, Nancy D. Hessler, Paul D Moore, Alan H. Resnick and Carl E. Sassano.
Proposal 2:
The proposal to fix the number of directors constituting the board of directors at nine was
approved. The number of shares that voted for, against and abstained from voting on this proposal
are as follows:
24
|
|
|
|
|
Votes For: |
|
|
6,869,581 |
|
Votes Against: |
|
|
73,261 |
|
Votes Abstained: |
|
|
22,550 |
|
Broker Non-Votes |
|
|
|
|
Proposal 3:
The amendment to Article II,
Section 3 of the Companys Code of Regulations to be consistent with
Section 1701.58 of the Ohio Revised Code which provides in the context of a classified board that
shareholders may only remove a director for cause, and to change the voting requirements for such
removal, was defeated. The vote required for approval of this amendment was 75% of the issued and
outstanding shares. The number of shares that voted for, against and abstained from voting on this
proposal, and the number of broker non-votes are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Votes For: |
|
|
4,623,661 |
|
Votes Against: |
|
|
430,852 |
|
Votes Abstained: |
|
|
16,552 |
|
Broker Non-Votes* |
|
|
1,894,327 |
|
* Under the rules governing brokers who have record ownership of shares that they hold in street
name for their clientswho are the beneficial owners of such sharesbrokers have the discretion to
vote such shares on routine matters, such as director elections and the ratification of the
selection of an independent registered public accounting firm, but not on matters that may be
deemed to be non-routine. A broker non-vote occurs when shares held by a broker are not voted on
a non-routine proposal because the broker has not received voting instructions from the beneficial
owner and the broker lacks discretionary authority to vote the shares in the absence of such
instructions. Accordingly, a broker non-vote on this proposal had the same effect as a vote
against the proposal because shares that were not voted did not count toward the 75% vote
requirement.
Proposal 4:
The amendment to Article XI of the
Companys Code of Regulations to allow the board of directors to
amend certain provisions of the Code of Regulations was approved. The number of shares that voted
for, against and abstained from voting on this proposal are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Votes For: |
|
|
6,753,385 |
|
Votes Against: |
|
|
182,835 |
|
Votes Abstained: |
|
|
29,170 |
|
Broker Non-Votes |
|
|
|
|
Proposal 5:
The selection of BDO Seidman, LLP as the Companys independent registered public accountants for
the fiscal year ending March 28, 2009 was ratified. The number of shares that voted for, against
and abstained from voting on this proposal are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Votes For: |
|
|
6,925,429 |
|
Votes Against: |
|
|
19,507 |
|
Votes Abstained: |
|
|
20,456 |
|
Broker Non-Votes: |
|
|
|
|
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
On June, 2, 2008, the Company entered into an agreement with Gallina Development Corporation to extend the operating lease for its facility in Rochester, New York through March 31, 2019 ( the Lease Addendum). The Lease Addendum will become effective upon completion of an expansion of the existing facility, which is expected to occur during the Company's fiscal year ending March 28, 2009 and is being funded solely by Gallina Development Corporation. Pursuant to the Lease Addendum, the total minimum future rental payments will be approximately $3.4 million.
This
summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of
the Lease Addendum, a copy of which is filed as Exhibit 10.3 to this report and
incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
See Index to Exhibits.
25
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TRANSCAT, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date:
November 12, 2008
|
|
/s/ Charles P. Hadded |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charles P. Hadeed |
|
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Operating Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date:
November 12, 2008
|
|
/s/ John J. Zimmer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John J. Zimmer |
|
|
|
|
Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
26
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
Code of Regulations, as amended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10) |
|
Material Contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
Amendment Number One to Credit Agreement
dated as of August 14, 2008 between
Transcat, Inc. and JPMorgan Chase Bank,
N.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among
Transcat Acquisition Corp., Westcon, Inc.
and David Goodhead dated as of August 14,
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
Lease Addendum between Gallina Development
Corporation and Transcat, Inc. dated June
2, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31) |
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32) |
|
Section 1350 Certifications |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
Section 1350 Certifications |
27