Australian Business Weekly reports that award interpretation errors are emerging as one of the most pressing compliance issues for employers, with payroll mistakes now seen as a crisis of trust as much as a financial liability.
Underpayment remediation costs have ballooned across industries, from retail and higher education to financial services and more. The Fair Work Ombudsman confirmed $509 million in unpaid wages was recovered in 2022–23, and from 1 January 2025 intentional wage underpayments will be treated as a criminal offence.
Over the past decade, some of Australia’s most recognisable employers have faced investigations and costly backpay programs due to award misinterpretation. Banks, supermarket chains, universities and community organisations have all been caught out, with individual remediation bills stretching into the hundreds of millions. These high-profile cases demonstrate that errors are not confined to one industry or company size. They are part of a national pattern where complexity consistently overwhelms manual payroll processes.
“With 122 modern Awards and countless EBAs in play, complexity is not an edge case, it is the default,” said one industry commentator who requested to remain anonymous. “When manual processes are left to carry that complexity, mistakes are not just likely, they are inevitable, and trust is the collateral damage.”
The risks extend well beyond payroll departments. Misclassification, overlooked allowances and rostering rule breaches can escalate from spreadsheet errors into multi-million-dollar settlements. Experts note that even small businesses may face overlapping Awards, different employee types and shifting entitlements that vary depending on hours worked, days of the week or public holidays.
One example often cited is the RSPCA Queensland case, where more than 1,100 employees were underpaid a total of $2.8 million across a six-year period. An internal audit, followed by an independent review, revealed that the payroll system in use could not handle the intricate layering of Award rules. What looked like small miscalculations on individual rosters compounded over time into millions of dollars in liability and a significant reputational setback.
Employers are also grappling with the pace of legislative change, as Fair Work updates and state-based requirements evolve with little margin for error. Payroll teams must balance day-to-day processing with constant interpretation of new obligations, leaving many organisations exposed to unintended breaches. The growing expectation is that compliance frameworks will not only manage today’s rules but anticipate tomorrow’s, creating a more resilient system that reduces both financial and cultural risk.
Industry guidance now emphasises that compliance should be viewed as a trust exercise rather than a simple checkbox. Employers are encouraged to map roles accurately to the right Awards or EBAs before attempting automation, to encode legal rules such as penalties and allowances into systems rather than relying on memory, and to run test cycles against edge cases such as weekends, split shifts and public holidays. Regular audits, both internal and independent, are recommended as a proactive measure to prevent systemic drift.
The consensus is clear. Payroll accuracy is no longer only about compliance. It is culture made visible. Organisations that build fairness and transparency into their payroll processes not only protect themselves from financial and legal exposure, they also secure the trust and confidence of their workforce.
As one payroll advisor recently put it, “Payroll is where compliance meets culture. If you cannot pay correctly, you cannot lead credibly.”
###
For more information about Australian Business Weekly, contact the company here:
Australian Business Weekly
ABW Media Team
+61 13 28 46
info@abw.com.au
Sydney, Australia
