About Cabling Installation & Maintenance

Our mission: Bringing practical business and technical intelligence to today's structured cabling professionals

For more than 30 years, Cabling Installation & Maintenance has provided useful, practical information to professionals responsible for the specification, design, installation and management of structured cabling systems serving enterprise, data center and other environments. These professionals are challenged to stay informed of constantly evolving standards, system-design and installation approaches, product and system capabilities, technologies, as well as applications that rely on high-performance structured cabling systems. Our editors synthesize these complex issues into multiple information products. This portfolio of information products provides concrete detail that improves the efficiency of day-to-day operations, and equips cabling professionals with the perspective that enables strategic planning for networks’ optimum long-term performance.

Throughout our annual magazine, weekly email newsletters and 24/7/365 website, Cabling Installation & Maintenance digs into the essential topics our audience focuses on.

  • Design, Installation and Testing: We explain the bottom-up design of cabling systems, from case histories of actual projects to solutions for specific problems or aspects of the design process. We also look at specific installations using a case-history approach to highlight challenging problems, solutions and unique features. Additionally, we examine evolving test-and-measurement technologies and techniques designed to address the standards-governed and practical-use performance requirements of cabling systems.
  • Technology: We evaluate product innovations and technology trends as they impact a particular product class through interviews with manufacturers, installers and users, as well as contributed articles from subject-matter experts.
  • Data Center: Cabling Installation & Maintenance takes an in-depth look at design and installation workmanship issues as well as the unique technology being deployed specifically for data centers.
  • Physical Security: Focusing on the areas in which security and IT—and the infrastructure for both—interlock and overlap, we pay specific attention to Internet Protocol’s influence over the development of security applications.
  • Standards: Tracking the activities of North American and international standards-making organizations, we provide updates on specifications that are in-progress, looking forward to how they will affect cabling-system design and installation. We also produce articles explaining the practical aspects of designing and installing cabling systems in accordance with the specifications of established standards.

Cabling Installation & Maintenance is published by Endeavor Business Media, a division of EndeavorB2B.

Contact Cabling Installation & Maintenance

Editorial

Patrick McLaughlin

Serena Aburahma

Advertising and Sponsorship Sales

Peter Fretty - Vice President, Market Leader

Tim Carli - Business Development Manager

Brayden Hudspeth - Sales Development Representative

Subscriptions and Memberships

Subscribe to our newsletters and manage your subscriptions

Feedback/Problems

Send a message to our general in-box

 

ESG investing is not so divisive when choices are presented in better ways

ESG investing is not so divisive when choices are presented in better ways

The political backlash against environmental, social and governance investing has sent much of financial industry into retreat. But new research from a fellow at the Stanford Rock Center for Corporate Governance finds that the red-blue gap in attitudes toward ESG can be narrowed when investment choices are presented in better ways.

ESG investing has become a flashpoint in American politics, reflecting the broader ideological polarization gripping the country, writes Omar Vásquez Duque. While Republican-led states have enacted laws banning or restricting ESG considerations in public pension funds, Democratic-led states have embraced ESG as a tool to promote social and environmental goals.

“This contentious landscape raises a critical question: Are these legislative actions and corporate decisions reflective of the actual preferences of pension beneficiaries?” he asks. “My research reveals that despite political polarization, there is more consensus on social sustainability than commonly believed—if we present it in the right way.”

The study is based on two survey experiments with representative samples of the United States population with respect to gender and age.  The first survey essentially asked people how much they would be willing to pay for a product. The second presented people with different options that ideally resemble real-world trade-offs.

To measure participants’ preferences for ESG investing, the study used a series of decision tasks where respondents chose between two hypothetical pension fund options. Each option included an expected annual pension amount and several investment restrictions, such as avoiding companies tied to fossil fuels or gambling.

Each participant made 12 such decisions. The first experiment involved 2,120 participants and included fairly detailed descriptions of investment restrictions—e.g., fund A only invests in firms with a compliance program to minimize the risk of having children working within their supply chain. The second experiment, with 1,086 participants, used broader categories of restrictions—e.g., fund A does not invest in companies that do not abide by the United Nations labor rights standards.

ESG investing is not so divisive when choices are presented in better ways
Stanford University photo

“The results challenge the idea that ESG investing is inherently partisan. While Democrats broadly supported social and environmental objectives, Republicans also showed strong preferences for some social goals,” Duque wrote.

The phrasing was key. Abstract concepts like “labor rights,” which some may associate with a political agenda, led conservative respondents to prioritize profitability over social goals. Yet, when social causes were presented in more detail—such as “guaranteeing living wages”—support grew across the political spectrum.

Three ESG investment restrictions drew significant bipartisan support:

  1. Excluded companies that may employ children
  2. Supported companies that advocate for equal pay between men and women
  3. Favored companies ensuring their workers earn enough to avoid poverty.

“People may well have a strong preference for some social goals but dislike environmental restrictions. The term ESG lumps together diverse objectives—environmental, social and governance—into a single concept. This one-size-fits-all approach prevents many individuals from aligning their investments with their values and fuels misconceptions about what ESG entails,” Duque said.

“Many participants—even conservatives and those who in principle oppose ESG investing—are willing to accept lower returns to support specific social objectives,” Duque said in an article on the Promarket website from the University of Chicago’s Booth School.

Ream more: Millennials will power the impact investing market to $1.3 trillion by 2029

Stock Quote API & Stock News API supplied by www.cloudquote.io
Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes.
By accessing this page, you agree to the following
Privacy Policy and Terms Of Service.