ETFOptimize | High-performance ETF-based Investment Strategies

Quantitative strategies, Wall Street-caliber research, and insightful market analysis since 1998.


ETFOptimize | HOME
Close Window

Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy Announces Steve Wozniak’s “Bitcoin Giveaway" Lawsuit to go Forward

Court of Appeal Reverses Dismissal Under Section 230

In a 38-page published opinion, the Court of Appeal for California’s Sixth Appellate District ruled on Friday that the lawsuit challenging YouTube and Google’s immunity under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act brought by Steve Wozniak, the co-founder of Apple and renowned tech entrepreneur, and 17 victims of a “Bitcoin Giveaway” fraudulent scam, will be allowed to proceed.

As alleged in the Complaint filed by Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, the Bitcoin Giveaway scam uses images and video of Steve Wozniak, and other celebrities including Elon Musk and Bill Gates, to convince YouTube users that they are hosting a live Bitcoin Giveaway event and that, for a limited time, any user who sends in their cryptocurrency will receive twice as much back. When users transfer their cryptocurrency, nothing is returned. As alleged, YouTube and Google ignored repeated requests to take the scam videos down, failed to protect its users, and knowingly promoted and profited from the scam by, among other things, providing targeted advertising. The complaint alleges that Steve Wozniak’s reputation has been and continues to be harmed by the scam.

A superior court judge dismissed the complaint, stating “the Court has sympathy for the victims of this cryptocurrency scam, including Mr. Wozniak . . . But as the Court understands the current state of the law, such relief against YouTube . . . is barred” under Section 230.

The Court of Appeal reversed, finding that plaintiffs adequately alleged that YouTube is responsible for the information it provided in its “verification badges,” which represented to users that the YouTube channels used by the fraudsters were authentic, and held that plaintiffs should be allowed to amend to allege that these verification badges materially contributed to the fraud.

Steve Wozniak said:

“YouTube, like Google, seems to rely on algorithms and no special effort requiring custom software employed quickly in these cases of criminal activity. If a crime is being committed, you MUST be able to reach humans capable of stopping it. What human would see posts like these and not ban them as criminal immediately?”

According to Joe Cotchett, one of the lawyers representing Steve Wozniak and the fraud victims:

“The Court of Appeal decision demonstrates that social media platforms like Google and YouTube need to take responsibility for their actions and they cannot use Section 230 as a total shield for their conduct. We allege that YouTube knowingly allowed the Bitcoin scam to go on for months, promoted it, and profited from it by selling targeted advertising Tens of millions of dollars in cryptocurrency have been lost in this scam which could have been prevented by YouTube.”

According to Brian Danitz, a partner at Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, and one of the lawyers representing Steve Wozniak and the fraud victims:

“Courts have given Section 230 immunity for social media platforms an extraordinarily broad scope. This is an important decision recognizing that there are limits to Section 230 immunity. Online platforms, like YouTube, cannot rely on blanket immunity when their own actions and speech materially contribute to the harm suffered by their users.”

According to Nanci Nishimura, another partner at Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, and one of the lawyers representing Steve Wozniak and the fraud victims:

“Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act has been used by social media tech companies since enactment in 1996 – as an absolute bar against fraud claims by consumers and parents for harm to their children – to make money. Finally, courts are realizing that tech companies who verify the authenticity of fraudsters apps are not immune under section 230 and can be liable – time’s up!”

Steve Wozniak and the 17 fraud victims named in the Complaint are represented by Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy LLP in Burlingame, California.

About Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP

Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP engages exclusively in litigation and trials and has earned a national reputation for its dedication to prosecuting or defending socially just actions. To learn more about the firm, visit www.cpmlegal.com.

Contacts

Brian Danitz & Nanci E. Nishimura

Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP

(650) 697-6000 – Office

MEDIA:

Lee Housekeeper

(415) 654-9141 - Cell

NewsService@aol.com

Data & News supplied by www.cloudquote.io
Stock quotes supplied by Barchart
Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes.
By accessing this page, you agree to the following
Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.


 

IntelligentValue Home
Close Window

DISCLAIMER

All content herein is issued solely for informational purposes and is not to be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor should it be interpreted as a recommendation to buy, hold or sell (short or otherwise) any security.  All opinions, analyses, and information included herein are based on sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty of any kind, expressed or implied, is made including but not limited to any representation or warranty concerning accuracy, completeness, correctness, timeliness or appropriateness. We undertake no obligation to update such opinions, analysis or information. You should independently verify all information contained on this website. Some information is based on analysis of past performance or hypothetical performance results, which have inherent limitations. We make no representation that any particular equity or strategy will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. Shareholders, employees, writers, contractors, and affiliates associated with ETFOptimize.com may have ownership positions in the securities that are mentioned. If you are not sure if ETFs, algorithmic investing, or a particular investment is right for you, you are urged to consult with a Registered Investment Advisor (RIA). Neither this website nor anyone associated with producing its content are Registered Investment Advisors, and no attempt is made herein to substitute for personalized, professional investment advice. Neither ETFOptimize.com, Global Alpha Investments, Inc., nor its employees, service providers, associates, or affiliates are responsible for any investment losses you may incur as a result of using the information provided herein. Remember that past investment returns may not be indicative of future returns.

Copyright © 1998-2017 ETFOptimize.com, a publication of Optimized Investments, Inc. All rights reserved.