ETFOptimize | High-performance ETF-based Investment Strategies

Quantitative strategies, Wall Street-caliber research, and insightful market analysis since 1998.


ETFOptimize | HOME
Close Window

MongoDB vs. Snowflake: Which SaaS Stock Is a Better Buy?

Today I'll analyze MongoDB (MDB) and Snowflake (SNOW) to determine which SaaS stock is currently a better buy.

Software as a service (SaaS) is one of the most popular forms of cloud computing that enables users to connect to and utilize cloud-based products over the Internet. The demand for SaaS solutions is estimated to grow as companies around the world adopt SaaS products for different business functions. According to Financial News Media, the global SaaS industry is expected to reach $307.3 billion by 2026, growing at a CAGR of 11.7%. Consequently, businesses from this industry should benefit.  

Given this backdrop, I am going to analyze and compare two SaaS companies: MongoDB (MDB) and Snowflake (SNOW), to determine which one is a better buy at current levels. 

Founded in 2007, MDB is a New York-based company that offers a general-purpose database platform around the world. It provides access to different enterprise software, including MongoDB Enterprise Advanced, MongoDB Atlas, and Community Server. Over the past six months, shares of MDB have returned about 16%.

SNOW is based in Bozeman, Montana, and offers a cloud-based data platform that grants users to merge data into a single source of truth.  SNOW  is also trading 16% higher over the past six months.  

Recent Developments 

On January 12th, Barclays Capital upgraded SNOW stock to Overweight from Equal Weight amid the recent sell-off, which presently offers investors “an attractive entry point.” However, the analyst lowered Snowflake’s price target from $393 to $367. The firm also noted SNOW’s “growth profile, scale, and importance to customers” as an argument for its bullish bias. In December, the company received another upgrade at Citigroup with a price target of $470

Recent Quarterly Performance & Analysts’ Estimates

MongoDB last issued its earnings results on Monday, December 6th. The company’s total revenue for its fiscal third-quarter of 2022 rose 50.5% year-over-year to $226.89 million, beating Wall Street estimates by $21.71 million. The increase in revenue was mainly driven by a 51% year-over-year increase in subscription revenue to $217.87 million, reflecting increased demand for MDB's platform and related services. In Q3, its gross margin was improved by 100 bps to 70%. 

However, the company's total operating expenses increased 44.52% from the year-ago value to $235.2 million, leading to a net loss of $81.29 million. As a result, MDB's Non-GAAP EPS stood at ($0.11), topping analysts' estimates by $0.27. 

For the next quarter, analysts expect MDB's EPS to come in at ($0.20), representing a 39.30% year-over-year growth. Its revenue for the fourth quarter of 2022 should advance 42.47% YoY to $243.63 million.

On December 1st, Snowflake reported earnings for the third fiscal quarter of 2022. The company’s total revenue grew 109.5% year-over-year to $334.41 million, primarily driven by a 110% year-over-year increase in its product revenue to $312.5 million. Also, SNOW topped the Wall Street revenue estimates by $28.28 million. 

In Q3, the company’s total customers came in 52.4% higher YoY at 5,416 with a net revenue retention rate of 173%. Besides, Snowflake reported a GAAP EPS of ($0.51), beating analysts' consensus by $0.10. 

A $0.02 consensus EPS estimate for the fourth quarter represents an improvement compared to its year-ago value of ($0.16). Moreover, SNOW's Q4 revenue is expected to increase 95.70% year-over-year to $372.7 million in the current quarter.

Comparing Options Market Sentiment 

Looking at the February 4th, 2022 option chain for both MDB and SNOW, we can define options market sentiment by analyzing the open interest levels. In MDB's occasion, the open calls/open puts ratio at the $400.00 strike price comes in at 0.15x, indicating a bearish options market sentiment. When it comes to SNOW, the open calls/open puts ratio at the $290.00 strike price stands at 2.34x, demonstrating a bullish sentiment.  

The Bottom Line

While MongoDB and Snowflake should benefit from the SaaS industry’s growth, I believe Snowflake is a better pick because of its better financials, higher forward growth rates, bullish options market sentiment, and favorable analyst coverage. 


MDB shares rose $2.23 (+0.58%) in premarket trading Wednesday. Year-to-date, MDB has declined -26.42%, versus a -3.52% rise in the benchmark S&P 500 index during the same period.



About the Author: Oleksandr Pylypenko

Oleksandr Pylypenko has more than 5 years of experience as an investment analyst and financial journalist. He has previously been a contributing writer for Seeking Alpha, Talks Market, and Market Realist.

More...

The post MongoDB vs. Snowflake: Which SaaS Stock Is a Better Buy? appeared first on StockNews.com
Data & News supplied by www.cloudquote.io
Stock quotes supplied by Barchart
Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes.
By accessing this page, you agree to the following
Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.


 

IntelligentValue Home
Close Window

DISCLAIMER

All content herein is issued solely for informational purposes and is not to be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor should it be interpreted as a recommendation to buy, hold or sell (short or otherwise) any security.  All opinions, analyses, and information included herein are based on sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty of any kind, expressed or implied, is made including but not limited to any representation or warranty concerning accuracy, completeness, correctness, timeliness or appropriateness. We undertake no obligation to update such opinions, analysis or information. You should independently verify all information contained on this website. Some information is based on analysis of past performance or hypothetical performance results, which have inherent limitations. We make no representation that any particular equity or strategy will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. Shareholders, employees, writers, contractors, and affiliates associated with ETFOptimize.com may have ownership positions in the securities that are mentioned. If you are not sure if ETFs, algorithmic investing, or a particular investment is right for you, you are urged to consult with a Registered Investment Advisor (RIA). Neither this website nor anyone associated with producing its content are Registered Investment Advisors, and no attempt is made herein to substitute for personalized, professional investment advice. Neither ETFOptimize.com, Global Alpha Investments, Inc., nor its employees, service providers, associates, or affiliates are responsible for any investment losses you may incur as a result of using the information provided herein. Remember that past investment returns may not be indicative of future returns.

Copyright © 1998-2017 ETFOptimize.com, a publication of Optimized Investments, Inc. All rights reserved.