ETFOptimize | High-performance ETF-based Investment Strategies

Quantitative strategies, Wall Street-caliber research, and insightful market analysis since 1998.


ETFOptimize | HOME
Close Window

NEM 3.0 will cut California’s residential solar market in half, WoodMac says

Consulting firm Wood Mackenzie released analysis saying California’s newly proposed net metering tariffs would cut the state’s residential solar market in half by 2024.

Consulting firm Wood Mackenzie released analysis saying California’s newly proposed net metering tariffs would cut the state’s residential solar market in half by 2024.

The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) proposal, known as NEM 3.0, would reduce payments granted to rooftop solar customers for the excess power they generate, which is known as net metering.

The proposal would also add monthly hookup charges of $8 per kilowatt (kW) of installed solar. The charge is intended to capture residential solar adopters’ “fair share of costs” to maintain the grid and fund public purpose programs.

The proposal, issued by energy regulators December 13, was scheduled for a CPUC vote on January 27 but has since been delayed. NEM 3.0 has received backlash from solar companies, renewable advocates, and California Gov. Gavin Newsom.

MORE: Solar backers pan California’s net metering plan, hint at a possible federal challenge

Wood Mackenzie’s analysis for two of the state’s largest utilities – Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) and Southern California Edison (SCE) – revealed payback periods for typical residential solar projects would increase from five to six years under current net metering to 14-15 years, depending on the utility. This would make customers less inclined to invest in solar projects and installers less motivated to sell them.

“Under the terms of the [proposal], NEM 3.0 rates would more than double solar project payback periods,” said Bryan White, research analyst and co-author of the Wood Mackenzie report. “Both the new monthly fixed charges and the lower export rates will reduce economic attractiveness.”

Researchers added that NEM 3.0 would result in more than 2.4 GW of demand reduction in California’s residential solar market through 2026. This represents a 36% decrease compared to the consulting firm’s forecast in the U.S. Solar Market Insight Q4 2021 report, which had already considered modest impacts from the proposal.

“Energy storage and financial products offer modest hedges against NEM 3.0 but will not yield sufficiently attractive economics to maintain residential solar market growth in California,” said White. “Installers will most likely need to sell much smaller solar projects to achieve savings for customers. This will put immense pressure on project margins as installers collect less revenue to cover fixed costs.”

Wood Mackenzie said that if approved, NEM 3.0 will likely start impacting solar installations in July or August of this year. Accordingly, researchers predicted installers will spend the first half of 2022 selling as many residential solar systems as possible under NEM 2.0 rates.

Under NEM 3.0, the researchers believe annual residential installed capacity will fall to just over 700 MW in 2024 – roughly half of 2021 volumes, and the lowest annual output for California since 2014.

“The market will return to single digit growth in 2025 and 2026 as it begins a modest recovery,” the Wood Mackenzie analysis said. “Solar and storage system price declines will provide some relief to industry players after a few tough years.”

Data & News supplied by www.cloudquote.io
Stock quotes supplied by Barchart
Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes.
By accessing this page, you agree to the following
Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.


 

IntelligentValue Home
Close Window

DISCLAIMER

All content herein is issued solely for informational purposes and is not to be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor should it be interpreted as a recommendation to buy, hold or sell (short or otherwise) any security.  All opinions, analyses, and information included herein are based on sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty of any kind, expressed or implied, is made including but not limited to any representation or warranty concerning accuracy, completeness, correctness, timeliness or appropriateness. We undertake no obligation to update such opinions, analysis or information. You should independently verify all information contained on this website. Some information is based on analysis of past performance or hypothetical performance results, which have inherent limitations. We make no representation that any particular equity or strategy will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. Shareholders, employees, writers, contractors, and affiliates associated with ETFOptimize.com may have ownership positions in the securities that are mentioned. If you are not sure if ETFs, algorithmic investing, or a particular investment is right for you, you are urged to consult with a Registered Investment Advisor (RIA). Neither this website nor anyone associated with producing its content are Registered Investment Advisors, and no attempt is made herein to substitute for personalized, professional investment advice. Neither ETFOptimize.com, Global Alpha Investments, Inc., nor its employees, service providers, associates, or affiliates are responsible for any investment losses you may incur as a result of using the information provided herein. Remember that past investment returns may not be indicative of future returns.

Copyright © 1998-2017 ETFOptimize.com, a publication of Optimized Investments, Inc. All rights reserved.