ETFOptimize | High-performance ETF-based Investment Strategies

Quantitative strategies, Wall Street-caliber research, and insightful market analysis since 1998.


ETFOptimize | HOME
Close Window

Castor Maritime vs. Star Bulk Carriers: Which Shipping Stock is a Better Buy?

With the resumption of industrial activities, the growing demand for dry bulk commodities has been increasing the demand for maritime transport services worldwide. Amid growing supply chain issues and rising shipping rates as the demand builds, prominent shipping stocks Star Bulk Carriers (SBLK) and Castor Maritime (CTRM) should benefit. But which of these stocks is a better buy now? Read on. Let’s find out.

Star Bulk Carriers Corporation (SBLK) and Castor Maritime Inc. (CTRM) are two prominent players in the marine shipping industry. SBLK is an Athens, Greece-based shipping company that provides ocean transportation for dry bulk cargoes and offers vessel management services worldwide. In comparison, Limassol, Cyprus-based CTRM engages in ocean transportation of dry bulk cargoes worldwide. It focuses on growing its fleet through acquisitions of new and modern vessels. Both companies offer seaborne transportation of major bulks, such as iron ore, coal, and grains and minor bulks, such as bauxite, fertilizers, and steel products.

The growing demand for raw materials and dry bulk goods with the resumption of industrial activities has led to an increasing need for marine shipping worldwide. Simultaneously, a labor shortage, tight container capacity, and port congestion have lately led to rising shipping rates and associated costs. But overall, the backdrop looks favorable for the marine shipping industry.

Rising investor optimism about the industry’s growth prospects is evident in the SonicShares Global Shipping ETF’s (BOAT) 15.4% gains over the past three months compared to the SPDR S&P 500 Trust ETF’s (SPY) negative returns. The global dry bulk shipping market is expected to grow at a 4% CAGR to $5.48 billion by 2030. So, both SBLK and SPOT should benefit in the coming months. But while CTRM’s stock has declined 88.4% in price over the past year, SBLK surged 86.1%. SBLK is also a clear winner with 37.1% gains versus CTRM’s negative returns over the past three months. But which of these stocks is a better pick now? Let’s find out.

Recent Financial Results

SBLK’s total revenues for its fiscal 2021 third quarter, ended Sept. 30, 2021, increased 107.6% year-over-year to $415.69 million. The company’s operating income came in at $235.38 million, up 444.3% from the year-ago period. And while its adjusted net income increased 717.5% year-over-year to $224.67 million, its adjusted EPS increased 655.2% to $2.19. As of Sept. 30, 2021, the company had $369.65 million in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash.

For its fiscal 2021 fourth quarter ended Dec. 31, 2021, CTRM’s vessel revenues increased 1268.4% year-over-year to $60.01 million. The company’s operating income came in at $30.55 million, versus a $475,406 loss  prior-year period. CTRM’s net income came in at $29.21 million, versus a $768.912 loss in the year-ago period. Its EPS was  $0.18, versus a $0.06 loss per share in the prior-year period. The company had $37.17 million in cash and cash equivalents as of Dec. 31, 2021.

Past Financial Performance

SBLK’s EBITDA and net income have increased at CAGRs of 40.7% and 79.5%, respectively, over the past three years. And the company’s EPS has grown at a 59.3% CAGR over the past three years.

In comparison, CTRM’s EBITDA and net income have grown at CAGRs of 214% and 226.3%, respectively, over the past three years. The company’s EPS has declined at 57.8% CAGR over the past three years.

Valuation

In terms of trailing-12-month Price/Sales, SBLK is currently trading at 2.36x, which is 116.5% higher than CTRM’s 1.09x. And in terms of trailing-12-month Price-to-Book, CTRM’s 0.47x compares with SBLK’s 1.40x.

Profitability

SBLK’s trailing-12-month revenue is almost 8.4 times CTRM’s. SBLK is also more profitable, with a 55.3% EBITDA margin versus CTRM’s 51.5%.

Furthermore, SBLK’s 14% levered free cash flow compares favorably with CTRM’s negative value.

POWR Ratings

While SBLK has an overall B grade, which translates to Buy in our proprietary POWR Ratings system, CTRM has an overall C grade, equating to a Neutral. The POWR Ratings are calculated by considering 118 distinct factors, each weighted to an optimal degree.

Both SBLK and CTRM have B grades for Momentum, in sync with their its impressive price gains over the past year. SBLK has gained 18% over the past month, while CTRM rose 26.7%.

SBLK has a B grade for Quality, consistent with its higher-than-industry profitability ratios. SBLK’s 14% trailing-12-month levered free cash flow is 174.2% higher than the 5.1% industry average. CTRM’s C grade for Quality is in sync with its negative levered free cash flow value.

Of 46 stocks in the B-rated Shipping industry, SBLK is ranked #14, while CTRM is ranked #26.

Beyond what we have stated above, our POWR Ratings system has also rated SBLK and CTRM for Growth, Sentiment, Stability, and Value. Get all SBLK ratings here. Also, click here to see the additional POWR Ratings for CTRM.

The Winner

Despite rising shipping rates, the growing demand for shipping services to transport dry bulk commodities should benefit SBLK and CTRM. However, its higher profitability we think makes SBLK a better buy here.

Our research shows that the odds of success increase if one bets on stocks with an Overall POWR Rating of Buy or Strong Buy. Click here to access the top-rated stocks in the Shipping industry.


SBLK shares were trading at $27.31 per share on Tuesday afternoon, up $1.03 (+3.92%). Year-to-date, SBLK has gained 20.47%, versus a -6.25% rise in the benchmark S&P 500 index during the same period.



About the Author: Sweta Vijayan

Sweta is an investment analyst and journalist with a special interest in finding market inefficiencies. She’s passionate about educating investors, so that they may find success in the stock market.

More...

The post Castor Maritime vs. Star Bulk Carriers: Which Shipping Stock is a Better Buy? appeared first on StockNews.com
Data & News supplied by www.cloudquote.io
Stock quotes supplied by Barchart
Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes.
By accessing this page, you agree to the following
Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.


 

IntelligentValue Home
Close Window

DISCLAIMER

All content herein is issued solely for informational purposes and is not to be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor should it be interpreted as a recommendation to buy, hold or sell (short or otherwise) any security.  All opinions, analyses, and information included herein are based on sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty of any kind, expressed or implied, is made including but not limited to any representation or warranty concerning accuracy, completeness, correctness, timeliness or appropriateness. We undertake no obligation to update such opinions, analysis or information. You should independently verify all information contained on this website. Some information is based on analysis of past performance or hypothetical performance results, which have inherent limitations. We make no representation that any particular equity or strategy will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. Shareholders, employees, writers, contractors, and affiliates associated with ETFOptimize.com may have ownership positions in the securities that are mentioned. If you are not sure if ETFs, algorithmic investing, or a particular investment is right for you, you are urged to consult with a Registered Investment Advisor (RIA). Neither this website nor anyone associated with producing its content are Registered Investment Advisors, and no attempt is made herein to substitute for personalized, professional investment advice. Neither ETFOptimize.com, Global Alpha Investments, Inc., nor its employees, service providers, associates, or affiliates are responsible for any investment losses you may incur as a result of using the information provided herein. Remember that past investment returns may not be indicative of future returns.

Copyright © 1998-2017 ETFOptimize.com, a publication of Optimized Investments, Inc. All rights reserved.