ETFOptimize | High-performance ETF-based Investment Strategies

Quantitative strategies, Wall Street-caliber research, and insightful market analysis since 1998.


ETFOptimize | HOME
Close Window

Chegg vs. 2U: Which Education & Training Services Stock is a Better Buy?

Today I'll analyze Chegg (CHGG) and 2U (TWOU) to determine which e-learning stock is currently a better buy.

Electronic learning (E-learning) refers to learning and/or training with the usage of electronic devices such as computers and other devices. With the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the e-learning industry has experienced an exponential rise due to the closure of schools and universities worldwide. 

According to Facts & Factors, the global e-learning market size is anticipated to reach $374.3 billion, growing at a CAGR of 14.6% between 2020 and 2026. Consequently, companies that offer online education services should benefit in the long term. 

In today’s article, I am going to analyze and compare two education & training services stocks, Chegg, Inc. (CHGG) and 2U, Inc. (TWOU), to determine which one currently presents a better buying opportunity. 

Based in Santa Clara, California, Chegg operates a direct-to-student learning platform that supports students through different solutions, including Chegg Services, Chegg Study, Chegg Writing, and others. Founded in 2008, 2U, Inc. is a Maryland-based company that offers online education services. The company operates through two business segments: Degree Program and Alternative Credential. 

Year-to-Date (YTD), CHGG stock is down 8%, while shares of TWOU have plunged about 52%.  

Recent Developments 

On January 13th, Piper Sandler analyst Arvind Ramnani upgraded Chegg to "Overweight" from "Neutral." The analyst noted that the shares look more attractive after some sector-wide sell-off. In addition, Ramnani believes that the company's core growth levers remain intact while it is still trading below pre-pandemic levels. However, the firm decreased its price target on CHGG to $43 from $54. 

On February 15th, William Blair analyst Stephen Sheldon downgraded 2U to "Market Perform" from "Outperform." The analyst said TWOU's disappointing 2022 guidance could keep the stock range-bound. The company has experienced a series of downgrades from other analysts as well. 

Recent‌ ‌Quarterly‌ ‌Performance‌ ‌&‌ ‌Analysts’‌ ‌Estimates‌ ‌

Chegg's total revenues for its fourth quarter of 2021 remained flat on a year-over-year basis, rising by only 1% YoY to $207.5 million. However, the company topped Wall Street revenue estimates by $12.3 million. The lion's share of CHGG's revenue is made up of Chegg Services. In Q4, Chegg Services segment revenue has been reported 6% higher YoY at $187.2 million due to lower account sharing, increased global awareness, and penetration. Additionally, CHGG disclosed a Non-GAAP Q4 EPS of $0.38, beating analysts' consensus by $0.07.

However, the company’s Adjusted EBITDA came in at $78 million compared to $87.87 million as of Q4 2020. 

For the next quarter, analysts project CHGG's EPS to be $0.24, down 13.11% year-over-year. In addition, analysts expect that its FQ1 revenues should rise by 2.38% to $203.10 million. 

2U, Inc has recently revealed earnings for its fourth quarter of 2021, and although the company surpassed Wall Street consensus, its shares have slid by over 50% on 2022 guidance disappointment. In Q4, the company’s total revenue grew 13.1% year-over-year to $243.6 million, slightly beating Wall Street's consensus by $0.6 million. Its degree program segment revenue grew 17% YoY to $152.4 million, while alternative credential segment revenue advanced 8% YoY to $91.2 million. Besides, 2U reported a Non-GAAP EPS of ($0.20), beating analysts' consensus by $0.05.

When it comes to TWOU's guidance, the company sees its FY2022 revenue and net loss in the range of $1.05-1.09 billion and $235-215 million, respectively. Its Adjusted EBITDA is expected to be $70-90 million, indicating 20% growth at the midpoint.

Currently, Wall Street expects TWOU's EPS to decrease 98.14% year-over-year in FQ1 to ($0.24). However, analysts see its fourth-quarter revenue at $253 million, indicating an 8.83% year-over-year increase.

Comparing Options Market Sentiment

Looking at the July 15th, 2022, option chain for both CHGG and TWOU, we can define options market sentiment by analyzing the calls/puts ratio. In CHGG's instance, the open calls/open puts ratio at the $30.00 strike price comes in at 2.17x, implying a bullish options market sentiment. When it comes to TWOU, the open calls/open puts ratio at the $10.00 strike price is 0.24x, showing a heavy bearish market sentiment.  

Conclusion

While Chegg and 2U should benefit from the e-learning industry’s growth in the long term, I believe Chegg appears to be a better investment based on its superior financials, better growth prospects, and favorable options market sentiment.


CHGG shares were trading at $28.64 per share on Tuesday morning, up $0.35 (+1.24%). Year-to-date, CHGG has declined -6.71%, versus a -8.47% rise in the benchmark S&P 500 index during the same period.



About the Author: Oleksandr Pylypenko

Oleksandr Pylypenko has more than 5 years of experience as an investment analyst and financial journalist. He has previously been a contributing writer for Seeking Alpha, Talks Market, and Market Realist.

More...

The post Chegg vs. 2U: Which Education & Training Services Stock is a Better Buy? appeared first on StockNews.com
Data & News supplied by www.cloudquote.io
Stock quotes supplied by Barchart
Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes.
By accessing this page, you agree to the following
Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.


 

IntelligentValue Home
Close Window

DISCLAIMER

All content herein is issued solely for informational purposes and is not to be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor should it be interpreted as a recommendation to buy, hold or sell (short or otherwise) any security.  All opinions, analyses, and information included herein are based on sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty of any kind, expressed or implied, is made including but not limited to any representation or warranty concerning accuracy, completeness, correctness, timeliness or appropriateness. We undertake no obligation to update such opinions, analysis or information. You should independently verify all information contained on this website. Some information is based on analysis of past performance or hypothetical performance results, which have inherent limitations. We make no representation that any particular equity or strategy will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. Shareholders, employees, writers, contractors, and affiliates associated with ETFOptimize.com may have ownership positions in the securities that are mentioned. If you are not sure if ETFs, algorithmic investing, or a particular investment is right for you, you are urged to consult with a Registered Investment Advisor (RIA). Neither this website nor anyone associated with producing its content are Registered Investment Advisors, and no attempt is made herein to substitute for personalized, professional investment advice. Neither ETFOptimize.com, Global Alpha Investments, Inc., nor its employees, service providers, associates, or affiliates are responsible for any investment losses you may incur as a result of using the information provided herein. Remember that past investment returns may not be indicative of future returns.

Copyright © 1998-2017 ETFOptimize.com, a publication of Optimized Investments, Inc. All rights reserved.