ETFOptimize | High-performance ETF-based Investment Strategies

Quantitative strategies, Wall Street-caliber research, and insightful market analysis since 1998.


ETFOptimize | HOME
Close Window

Better Buy: National Beverage Vs. Coca-Cola Company

Amid concerns over a potential recession, investors focus on shifting from cyclical stocks to defensive stocks. Therefore, beverage stocks National Beverage (FIZZ) and Coca-Cola Company (KO) are well-positioned to benefit. But which of these stocks is a better buy now? Read more to find out...

National Beverage Corp. (FIZZ) and The Coca-Cola Company (KO) are prominent beverage industry players. FIZZ produces and sells a portfolio of sparkling waters, juices, energy drinks, and carbonated soft drinks, primarily in the U.S. and Canada.

On the other hand, KO owns or licenses, markets beverage concentrates, finished sparkling soft-drinks brands, energy drinks, dairy, and syrups to fountain retailers such as restaurants and convenience stores.

The price index for non-alcoholic beverages increased 1.7% from the prior month. However, being non-cyclical in nature, non-alcoholic beverage companies should witness steady demand. Moreover, launching new products to keep pace with changing consumer tastes and easing supply chain issues should help fundamentally sound non-alcoholic beverage companies perform well.

Investors’ interest in this space is evident from the First Trust Nasdaq Food & Beverage ETF’s (FTXG) 5.3% returns over the past nine months versus the SPDR S&P 500 Trust ETF’s (SPY) 12.1% loss. The global non-alcoholic beverage market is expected to grow at a 4.7% CAGR to reach $1.19 trillion by 2028. Therefore, both FIZZ and KO should benefit.

While FIZZ gained 3.6% over the past year, KO surged 16.3%. KO is a clear winner with 7% gains over the past six months versus FIZZ’s 6.6% returns. But which of these stocks is a better pick now? Let’s find out.

Recent Financial Results

For the fiscal 2022 full year ended April 30, 2022, FIZZ’s revenue increased 6.1% year-over-year to $1.14 billion. However, the company’s gross profit came in at $338.70 million, representing a marginal decline from the prior-year period. Its operating income came in at $207.86 million for the quarter, indicating an 8.8% year-over-year decline.

FIZZ’s net income came in at $158.51 million, down 9% from its year-ago period. Its EPS decreased 9.1% year-over-year to $1.69. As of April 30, 2022, the company had $48.05 million in cash and cash equivalents. 

For the fiscal 2022 first quarter ended April 1, 2022, KO’s net operating revenues increased 16.4% year-over-year to $10.50 billion. The company’s non-GAAP gross profit came in at $6.27 billion, representing a 14.8% rise from the year-ago period. Its non-GAAP operating income came in at $3.30 billion for the quarter, representing an 18.2% rise from the prior-year period.

While its non-GAAP net income increased 16.6% year-over-year to $2.80 billion, its non-GAAP EPS rose 16.4% to $0.64. As of April 1, 2022, the company had $7.68 billion in cash and cash equivalents.

Past and Expected Financial Performance

Over the past three years, FIZZ’s revenue, net income, and EPS have increased at CAGRs of 3.9%, 4%, and 4.1%, respectively.

FIZZ’s EPS is expected to increase 10.1% year-over-year in fiscal 2023, ending April 30, 2022, and 8.1% in fiscal 2024. Its revenue is expected to grow 5.3% in fiscal 2023 and 5.1% in fiscal 2024. Its EPS is expected to grow at a 25.6% rate per annum over the next five years.

Over the past three years, KO’s revenue, net income, and EPS have grown at 5%, 15.2%, and 14.7% CAGRs, respectively.

Analysts expect KO’s EPS to increase 6.5% year-over-year in fiscal 2022, ending December 31, 2022, and 7.3% in fiscal 2023. Its revenue is expected to grow 8.2% year-over-year in fiscal 2022 and 5.3% in fiscal 2023. Its EPS is expected to improve at a rate of 6.6% per annum over the next five years.

Valuation

In terms of non-GAAP forward P/E, FIZZ is currently trading at 26.36x, 3.6% higher than KO’s 25.45x. In terms of trailing-12-month Price-to-Book, KO’s 10.97x compares with FIZZ’s 21.63x.

Profitability

KO’s trailing-12-month revenue is 35.2 times that of FIZZ’s. Moreover, KO is also profitable, with a 60.3% gross profit margin versus FIZZ’s 36.7%.

Furthermore, KO’s EBITDA margin, net income margin, and levered free cash flow margin of 33.2%, 25.7%, and 17.5% compare with FIZZ’s 19.9%, 13.9%, and 7%, respectively.

POWR Ratings

While KO has an overall B grade, which translates to Buy in our proprietary POWR Ratings system, FIZZ has an overall C grade, equating to Neutral. The POWR Ratings are calculated by considering 118 distinct factors, each weighted to an optimal degree.

Both FIZZ and KO have been graded a C for Momentum, consistent with their mixed price performance over the past year.

KO has been graded a B in terms of Stability, which is in sync with its lower volatility compared to broader markets. KO has a 0.59 beta. FIZZ’s C grade for Stability reflects its relatively higher beta.

Of the 35 stocks in the A-rated Beverages industry, KO is ranked #13, while FIZZ is ranked #19.

Beyond what we have stated above, our POWR Ratings system has graded FIZZ and KO for Sentiment, Value, Growth, and Quality. Get all KO ratings here. Also, click here to see the additional POWR Ratings for FIZZ.

The Winner

Almost inelastic demand for non-alcoholic beverages in any business cycle should allow KO and FIZZ to stay afloat amid uncertain economic conditions. However, a relatively lower valuation and higher profitability make KO a better buy here.

Our research shows that the odds of success increase if one invests in stocks with an Overall POWR Rating of Buy or Strong Buy. Click here to access the top-rated stocks in the Beverages industry.


FIZZ shares were trading at $49.47 per share on Friday afternoon, up $0.53 (+1.08%). Year-to-date, FIZZ has gained 9.13%, versus a -19.12% rise in the benchmark S&P 500 index during the same period.



About the Author: Sweta Vijayan

Sweta is an investment analyst and journalist with a special interest in finding market inefficiencies. She’s passionate about educating investors, so that they may find success in the stock market.

More...

The post Better Buy: National Beverage Vs. Coca-Cola Company appeared first on StockNews.com
Data & News supplied by www.cloudquote.io
Stock quotes supplied by Barchart
Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes.
By accessing this page, you agree to the following
Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.


 

IntelligentValue Home
Close Window

DISCLAIMER

All content herein is issued solely for informational purposes and is not to be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor should it be interpreted as a recommendation to buy, hold or sell (short or otherwise) any security.  All opinions, analyses, and information included herein are based on sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty of any kind, expressed or implied, is made including but not limited to any representation or warranty concerning accuracy, completeness, correctness, timeliness or appropriateness. We undertake no obligation to update such opinions, analysis or information. You should independently verify all information contained on this website. Some information is based on analysis of past performance or hypothetical performance results, which have inherent limitations. We make no representation that any particular equity or strategy will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. Shareholders, employees, writers, contractors, and affiliates associated with ETFOptimize.com may have ownership positions in the securities that are mentioned. If you are not sure if ETFs, algorithmic investing, or a particular investment is right for you, you are urged to consult with a Registered Investment Advisor (RIA). Neither this website nor anyone associated with producing its content are Registered Investment Advisors, and no attempt is made herein to substitute for personalized, professional investment advice. Neither ETFOptimize.com, Global Alpha Investments, Inc., nor its employees, service providers, associates, or affiliates are responsible for any investment losses you may incur as a result of using the information provided herein. Remember that past investment returns may not be indicative of future returns.

Copyright © 1998-2017 ETFOptimize.com, a publication of Optimized Investments, Inc. All rights reserved.