ETFOptimize | High-performance ETF-based Investment Strategies

Quantitative strategies, Wall Street-caliber research, and insightful market analysis since 1998.


ETFOptimize | HOME
Close Window

SpaceX wins reprieve from DOJ suit alleging hiring discrimination

A federal judge in Texas blocked the Dept. of Justice's administrative lawsuit against SpaceX that accused the company of hiring discrimination against asylum recipients and refugees.

A federal judge granted a reprieve to SpaceX, ruling the Department of Justice (DOJ) lawsuit against the company over allegations of hiring discrimination against asylum recipients and refugees.

The DOJ filed an administrative lawsuit against SpaceX in August based on allegations that SpaceX actively discouraged asylees and refugees from applying for jobs at the company in violation of the Immigration and Nationality Act – which it said occurred from at least 2018 to 2022. The DOJ cited comments by SpaceX CEO Elon Musk as well as the company’s job postings in its suit. SpaceX denied wrongdoing and filed a countersuit in September that argued the administrative case was unconstitutional. 

Judge Rolando Olvera, of the Southern District of Texas, blocked the DOJ’s suit from moving forward pending the conclusion of SpaceX’s lawsuit in a late Wednesday ruling. Olvera ruled that the administrative law judges, who are appointed by the attorney general, overstepped their legal authority because they exercised powers that should be reserved for officials appointed by the president.

ELON MUSK HITS BACK AT DOJ OVER LAWSUIT ALLEGING HIRING DISCRIMINATION BY SPACEX

SpaceX did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The DOJ declined to comment on the suit – leaving it unclear what the agency’s next step may be in attempting to pursue legal recourse against SpaceX for the alleged hiring discrimination.

In its lawsuit, the DOJ alleged that SpaceX illegally discouraged asylum recipients and refugees from applying for jobs at the rocket and satellite company due to what the DOJ said was a flawed interpretation of export control laws that restrict access to sensitive technologies. 

DOJ FILES LAWSUIT ACCUSING SPACEX OF HIRING DISCRIMINATION AGAINST REFUGEES, ASYLUM RECIPIENTS

In both job postings and public remarks by SpaceX employees like Musk, the company asserted that it could only hire U.S. citizens and legal permanent residents, also known as green card holders.

A 2020 post by Musk on X, then Twitter, said that "US law requires at least a green card to be hired at SpaceX, as rockets are considered advanced weapons technology." Musk’s post was included in the DOJ’s lawsuit, as were references to SpaceX not being able to hire people without at least a green card due to the International Traffic in Arms Regulations and export control rules.

GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE

SpaceX launched its 29th commercial resupply mission to the International Space Station Thursday evening from NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida. 

The company said it was the second flight of the first-stage booster supporting the mission, and the Falcon 9 rocket will land at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station Landing Zone 1. The mission is also the second flight for this particular Dragon spacecraft.

Reuters contributed to this report.

Data & News supplied by www.cloudquote.io
Stock quotes supplied by Barchart
Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes.
By accessing this page, you agree to the following
Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.


 

IntelligentValue Home
Close Window

DISCLAIMER

All content herein is issued solely for informational purposes and is not to be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor should it be interpreted as a recommendation to buy, hold or sell (short or otherwise) any security.  All opinions, analyses, and information included herein are based on sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty of any kind, expressed or implied, is made including but not limited to any representation or warranty concerning accuracy, completeness, correctness, timeliness or appropriateness. We undertake no obligation to update such opinions, analysis or information. You should independently verify all information contained on this website. Some information is based on analysis of past performance or hypothetical performance results, which have inherent limitations. We make no representation that any particular equity or strategy will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. Shareholders, employees, writers, contractors, and affiliates associated with ETFOptimize.com may have ownership positions in the securities that are mentioned. If you are not sure if ETFs, algorithmic investing, or a particular investment is right for you, you are urged to consult with a Registered Investment Advisor (RIA). Neither this website nor anyone associated with producing its content are Registered Investment Advisors, and no attempt is made herein to substitute for personalized, professional investment advice. Neither ETFOptimize.com, Global Alpha Investments, Inc., nor its employees, service providers, associates, or affiliates are responsible for any investment losses you may incur as a result of using the information provided herein. Remember that past investment returns may not be indicative of future returns.

Copyright © 1998-2017 ETFOptimize.com, a publication of Optimized Investments, Inc. All rights reserved.