ETFOptimize | High-performance ETF-based Investment Strategies

Quantitative strategies, Wall Street-caliber research, and insightful market analysis since 1998.


ETFOptimize | HOME
Close Window

Senate committee votes to subpoena Harlan Crow, Leonard Leo in Supreme Court ethics investigation

The Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday voted to subpoena conservatives Harlan Crow and Leonard Leo over their ties to luxury travel enjoyed by Justice Clarence Thomas.

Republican senators are up in arms over an effort by Democrats to subpoena billionaire Harlan Crowe and conservative activist Leonard Leo over their ties to luxury travel and gifts accepted by Supreme Court justices. 

The Senate Judiciary Committee voted Thursday to subpoena the conservatives after consideration of several judicial nominees. Chairman Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., said in his opening remarks the subpoenas are "key pieces of our legislative effort to establish an effective code of conduct" for the Supreme Court. 

"I don't buy anything you just said," Ranking member Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., replied. "Let's just be real blunt and direct: This is garbage." 

Democrats have long sought to cross-examine Crow, a Republican megadonor, and Leo, the vice president of the Federal Society, as part of an ethics probe into allegations that Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito failed to disclose luxury vacations paid for by the conservatives, their friends. 

SUPREME COURT ADOPTS MODIFIED ETHICS CODE AFTER PRESSURE FROM HILL DEMS

Thursday's vote comes weeks after the Supreme Court issued a new "Code of Conduct" in response to months of heightened scrutiny from Democratic lawmakers and news reports. Durbin said the self-imposed ethics code "falls far short" and urged Congress to impose more rigorous standards on the high court. 

Republicans have panned Democrat-sponsored legislation, the Supreme Court Ethics, Recusal and Transparency (SCERT) Act, as a "court-killing machine" that would "destroy the legitimacy of the conservative court." They argue that federal judges are already bound to an ethics code, including Supreme Court justices, and that an act of Congress on the judiciary would unconstitutionally infringe on a separate and co-equal branch of government. 

SENATE DEMOCRATS TURN UP THE HEAT, ANNOUNCE 'NEXT STEP' IN SUPREME COURT ETHICS INVESTIGATION

Ahead of the hearing, GOP senators introduced more than 170 amendments in what Durbin told reporters was an attempt to delay the subpoenas. 

"It's an indication that they're determined to delay any opportunity to serve a subpoena on Leonard Leo and others who are engaged in this," Durbin said. "I just think they are afraid, very afraid that there was information that could be controversial and harmful." 

TOP DEMOCRAT TRIES TO SCHOOL JUSTICE ALITO IN GROWING TIFF OVER SUPREME COURT OVERSIGHT

But Republicans lambasted the Democrat-led effort as political theater. "I call it subpoena palooza," Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., told reporters outside the hearing room. 

Graham challenged Democrats, saying that if they were serious about the allegations against Thomas and Alito, they would bring the SCERT Act up for a vote. "Why hasn't the majority leader brought up the bill that all of y'all voted for to fix this problem?" he demanded, later supplying that Democrats won't advance the bill because it lacks enough support to pass in the Senate. 

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

"I don't know who's driving the train on your side, but you're driving the committee off into a ditch," Graham added, calling the subpoena vote a "joke." 

Fox News' Tyler Olson and the Associated Press contributed to this report.

Data & News supplied by www.cloudquote.io
Stock quotes supplied by Barchart
Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes.
By accessing this page, you agree to the following
Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.


 

IntelligentValue Home
Close Window

DISCLAIMER

All content herein is issued solely for informational purposes and is not to be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor should it be interpreted as a recommendation to buy, hold or sell (short or otherwise) any security.  All opinions, analyses, and information included herein are based on sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty of any kind, expressed or implied, is made including but not limited to any representation or warranty concerning accuracy, completeness, correctness, timeliness or appropriateness. We undertake no obligation to update such opinions, analysis or information. You should independently verify all information contained on this website. Some information is based on analysis of past performance or hypothetical performance results, which have inherent limitations. We make no representation that any particular equity or strategy will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. Shareholders, employees, writers, contractors, and affiliates associated with ETFOptimize.com may have ownership positions in the securities that are mentioned. If you are not sure if ETFs, algorithmic investing, or a particular investment is right for you, you are urged to consult with a Registered Investment Advisor (RIA). Neither this website nor anyone associated with producing its content are Registered Investment Advisors, and no attempt is made herein to substitute for personalized, professional investment advice. Neither ETFOptimize.com, Global Alpha Investments, Inc., nor its employees, service providers, associates, or affiliates are responsible for any investment losses you may incur as a result of using the information provided herein. Remember that past investment returns may not be indicative of future returns.

Copyright © 1998-2017 ETFOptimize.com, a publication of Optimized Investments, Inc. All rights reserved.