ETFOptimize | High-performance ETF-based Investment Strategies

Quantitative strategies, Wall Street-caliber research, and insightful market analysis since 1998.


ETFOptimize | HOME
Close Window

Tesla settles lawsuit over Autopilot crash that left Apple engineer dead

Tesla settled a lawsuit regarding the fatal crash that killed an Apple software engineer who was playing a game when his car's Autopilot steered into a safety barrier.

Tesla reached a settlement in a lawsuit over the 2018 fatal crash that killed an Apple engineer who was behind the wheel of his Model X while on Autopilot, when the car swerved into a barrier on a highway near San Francisco.

The settlement was made the day before the trial was scheduled to begin, ending a five-year legal battle, according to Reuters, and the terms of the settlement were not disclosed.

Tesla did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital’s request for comment on the matter.

In March 2018, Walter Huang, a 38-year-old Apple software engineer, was driving the Tesla Model X in Mountain View in Autopilot mode at about 70 mph when it crashed into a safety barrier.

TESLA MAY HAVE A FEW ACES UP THEIR SLEEVE: STEVE WESTLY

The National Transportation and Safety Board (NTSB) said Huang had reported issues on prior trips with the Autopilot feature, steering the wheel toward an area between a highway ramp and the left lane. Crossing that portion of the road, known as the "gore area," is a moving violation.

Data from the vehicle showed that in prior trips, Huang had taken corrective action after the vehicle steered itself toward the area. The NTSB said Huang’s hands were not detected on the steering wheel in the final six seconds before the fatal crash that took his life.

In the same report, the NTSB said there was no evidence of braking or evasive action.

ELON MUSK SAYS REUTERS ‘LYING’ IN REPORTING TESLA SCRAPPED PLAN FOR LOW-COST CAR

But the agency found evidence that Huang was playing a game on his smartphone at the time of the crash.

In February 2020, NTSB Chairman Robert Sumwalt said at the start of a hearing that partially automated driving systems like Tesla’s Autopilot do not allow cars to drive themselves, yet drivers continue to use the feature without paying attention.

"If you own a car with partial automation, you do not own a self-driving car," Sumwalt said in opening statements at the time. "This means that when driving in the supposed ‘self-driving’ mode, you can’t read a book, you can’t watch a movie or TV show, you can’t text and you can’t play video games."

TESLA DRIVER IN FATAL CRASH HAD REPORTED PROBLEMS BEFORE WITH ‘AUTOPILOT’ FEATURE

Huang’s family alleged that Autopilot steered his vehicle into a highway barrier, and his attorneys questioned if the car manufacturer understood that drivers likely would not or could not use the Autopilot system as directed.

Still, Tesla contended Huang did not use the Autopilot feature correctly because he was playing a video game before the accident.

Monday’s settlement has the potential of paving the way for future cases suing Tesla over Autopilot. The company currently faces lawsuits over crashes related to the use of Autopilot.

The settlement follows two other trials in California over Autopilot, which Tesla won when it argued the drivers involved did not follow the company’s instructions to maintain attention while using the system.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE ON FOX BUSINESS

Autopilot is designed to keep a vehicle in its lane and keep a safe distance from vehicles in front of it. It also can change lanes with driver approval. Tesla says Autopilot is intended to be used for driver assistance and that drivers must be ready to intervene at all times.

Reuters contributed to this report.

Data & News supplied by www.cloudquote.io
Stock quotes supplied by Barchart
Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes.
By accessing this page, you agree to the following
Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.


 

IntelligentValue Home
Close Window

DISCLAIMER

All content herein is issued solely for informational purposes and is not to be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor should it be interpreted as a recommendation to buy, hold or sell (short or otherwise) any security.  All opinions, analyses, and information included herein are based on sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty of any kind, expressed or implied, is made including but not limited to any representation or warranty concerning accuracy, completeness, correctness, timeliness or appropriateness. We undertake no obligation to update such opinions, analysis or information. You should independently verify all information contained on this website. Some information is based on analysis of past performance or hypothetical performance results, which have inherent limitations. We make no representation that any particular equity or strategy will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. Shareholders, employees, writers, contractors, and affiliates associated with ETFOptimize.com may have ownership positions in the securities that are mentioned. If you are not sure if ETFs, algorithmic investing, or a particular investment is right for you, you are urged to consult with a Registered Investment Advisor (RIA). Neither this website nor anyone associated with producing its content are Registered Investment Advisors, and no attempt is made herein to substitute for personalized, professional investment advice. Neither ETFOptimize.com, Global Alpha Investments, Inc., nor its employees, service providers, associates, or affiliates are responsible for any investment losses you may incur as a result of using the information provided herein. Remember that past investment returns may not be indicative of future returns.

Copyright © 1998-2017 ETFOptimize.com, a publication of Optimized Investments, Inc. All rights reserved.