ETFOptimize | High-performance ETF-based Investment Strategies

Quantitative strategies, Wall Street-caliber research, and insightful market analysis since 1998.


ETFOptimize | HOME
Close Window

California Gov. Newsom's budget could cost businesses billions in higher taxes

California Gov. Gavin Newsom's budget proposal could cost businesses in the state $18 billion over the next several years, according to a new analysis.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom pledged that his budget proposal to balance the state's ballooning $45 billion deficit would not include higher taxes on workers or businesses. 

"I don't see there's a real need right now to increase general taxes in the state, and put more burden on working folks and our competitive posture. I do not believe we need that this year or next year," Newsom, a Democrat, told reporters during a press conference earlier in May. "I don't know how many times I can say no to that tax question."

Yet a new report published by the California Taxpayers Association (CalTax), a nonpartisan and nonprofit tax research group, suggests Newsom's revised budget plan actually contains several indirect tax increases on businesses that could cost as much as $18 billion over the next four years. 

MASSACHUSETTS RISKS LOSING $1B AS WEALTHY RESIDENTS FLEE FOR LOWER-TAX STATES

Newsom called for banning businesses with annual revenue over $1 million from deducting their net operating losses and limiting usage of business tax credits to $5 million for the 2025, 2026 and 2027 tax years. 

CalTax estimated that change alone would increase corporate tax revenue by $15.9 billion over the next four years. 

INFLATION INCREASES 3.4% IN APRIL AS PRICES REMAIN ELEVATED

The proposal also calls for reversing a recent ruling by the Office of Tax Appeals (OTA) regarding the treatment of repatriated income. OTA ultimately sided with Microsoft in its long-running dispute with the Franchise Tax Board (FTB) over the treatment of its foreign earnings. Microsoft was awarded a $94 million refund – a "significant" decision that tax experts said could bring in millions of dollars for companies that do business in California. 

The FTB estimated the ruling could cost California about $1.3 billion in refunds immediately and millions more in coming years.

But Newsom's proposal would essentially nullify the decision by declaring the FTB had, in fact, correctly applied the law. The change would apply retroactively and prospectively to taxable years "beginning before, on, or after the effective date of this bill." 

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE ON FOX BUSINESS

"As the OTA correctly ruled, the refunds are required by law. The only ‘risk’ is to companies that were forced to overpay their corporate taxes and then fight for refunds, and now face the additional hurdle of an after-the-fact legislative change designed to allow the state to keep the money," CalTax wrote in the report.

The proposal comes as Newsom addresses what is one of the largest budget shortfalls in state history. In addition to indirect taxes on businesses, Newsom also floated deep spending cuts that would affect immigration, education and low-income parents seeking child care.

The California legislature has until June 15 to approve a budget or forfeit their pay until a budget is passed.

Data & News supplied by www.cloudquote.io
Stock quotes supplied by Barchart
Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes.
By accessing this page, you agree to the following
Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.


 

IntelligentValue Home
Close Window

DISCLAIMER

All content herein is issued solely for informational purposes and is not to be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor should it be interpreted as a recommendation to buy, hold or sell (short or otherwise) any security.  All opinions, analyses, and information included herein are based on sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty of any kind, expressed or implied, is made including but not limited to any representation or warranty concerning accuracy, completeness, correctness, timeliness or appropriateness. We undertake no obligation to update such opinions, analysis or information. You should independently verify all information contained on this website. Some information is based on analysis of past performance or hypothetical performance results, which have inherent limitations. We make no representation that any particular equity or strategy will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. Shareholders, employees, writers, contractors, and affiliates associated with ETFOptimize.com may have ownership positions in the securities that are mentioned. If you are not sure if ETFs, algorithmic investing, or a particular investment is right for you, you are urged to consult with a Registered Investment Advisor (RIA). Neither this website nor anyone associated with producing its content are Registered Investment Advisors, and no attempt is made herein to substitute for personalized, professional investment advice. Neither ETFOptimize.com, Global Alpha Investments, Inc., nor its employees, service providers, associates, or affiliates are responsible for any investment losses you may incur as a result of using the information provided herein. Remember that past investment returns may not be indicative of future returns.

Copyright © 1998-2017 ETFOptimize.com, a publication of Optimized Investments, Inc. All rights reserved.