ETFOptimize | High-performance ETF-based Investment Strategies

Quantitative strategies, Wall Street-caliber research, and insightful market analysis since 1998.


ETFOptimize | HOME
Close Window

Tesla must face false advertising claims against Autopilot, California administrative judge rules

A California administrative judge has rejected Tesla's bid to dismiss a lawsuit brought by the state's top regulator accusing Tesla of false marketing of its Autopilot system.

A California administrative judge on Monday set back Tesla as the electic carmaker fends off allegations from the state's top regulator that it falsely marketed its vehicles' self-driving feature.

Judge Juliet Cox of the state Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH) rejected Tesla's effort to have the lawsuit brought by the California Department of Motor Vehicles dismissed. The judge said that if the allegations are true, they would support enforcement action against Tesla.

In a five-page ruling, Cox said it was too early to dismiss the DMV case before a formal hearing. Tesla had argued a hearing was unnecessary since Cox had enough documents to review and rule.

The DMV sued in July 2022 over accusations that Tesla mislead customers about vehicles with Autopilot and Full Self-Driving Technology. Tesla vehicles "could not at the time of those advertisements, and cannot now, operate as autonomous vehicles," the lawsuit said, according to Reuters.

TESLA AUTOPILOT, SIMILAR AUTOMATED DRIVING SYSTEMS RATED ‘POOR’ BY SAFETY GROUP

If found liable, Tesla could have its license to sell vehicles in California suspended and be required to make restitution to Tesla owners who reside in the state.

Tesla did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The DMV told Reuters its claims will be formally reviewed before the OAH on Sept. 9.

TESLA DRIVER IN FATAL CRASH HAD REPORTED PROBLEMS BEFORE WITH ‘AUTOPILOT’ FEATURE

On May 15, a San Francisco federal judge rejected Tesla's bid to dismiss a proposed nationwide class action claiming it misled consumers into believing their vehicles would soon have self-driving capabilities.

Tesla, whose CEO Elon Musk relocated its corporate headquarters from Palo Alto in California to Austin, Texas in 2021, has faced federal probes into whether its self-driving technology might have contributed to fatal car crashes.

TESLA SETTLES LAWSUIT OVER AUTOPILOT CRASH THAT LEFT APPLE ENGINEER DEAD

In April, Tesla reached a settlement in a lawsuit over a 2018 fatal crash that killed an Apple engineer who was behind the wheel of his Model X while on Autopilot, when the car swerved into a barrier on a highway near San Francisco.

Federal prosecutors are separately examining whether Tesla committed fraud by misleading investors about self-driving, Reuters reported.

Tesla describes Autopilot as an "advanced driver assistance sytem" on its website that can match the speed of surrounding traffic on cruise control and assist with steering in clearly marked lanes. Tesla's Full Self-Driving Capability promises to let the car "drive itself almost anywhere with minimal driver intervention." 

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE ON FOX BUSINESS

Features include guidance on highway on-ramp and off-ramps, automatic lane changes, automatic steering, acceleration and braking and obedience to traffic signals. 

But Tesla has warned that Autopilot does not excuse drivers from paying attention on the road, and the technologies "do not make the vehicle autonomous." 

Fox Business' Greg Wehner and Reuters contributed to this report.

Data & News supplied by www.cloudquote.io
Stock quotes supplied by Barchart
Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes.
By accessing this page, you agree to the following
Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.


 

IntelligentValue Home
Close Window

DISCLAIMER

All content herein is issued solely for informational purposes and is not to be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor should it be interpreted as a recommendation to buy, hold or sell (short or otherwise) any security.  All opinions, analyses, and information included herein are based on sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty of any kind, expressed or implied, is made including but not limited to any representation or warranty concerning accuracy, completeness, correctness, timeliness or appropriateness. We undertake no obligation to update such opinions, analysis or information. You should independently verify all information contained on this website. Some information is based on analysis of past performance or hypothetical performance results, which have inherent limitations. We make no representation that any particular equity or strategy will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. Shareholders, employees, writers, contractors, and affiliates associated with ETFOptimize.com may have ownership positions in the securities that are mentioned. If you are not sure if ETFs, algorithmic investing, or a particular investment is right for you, you are urged to consult with a Registered Investment Advisor (RIA). Neither this website nor anyone associated with producing its content are Registered Investment Advisors, and no attempt is made herein to substitute for personalized, professional investment advice. Neither ETFOptimize.com, Global Alpha Investments, Inc., nor its employees, service providers, associates, or affiliates are responsible for any investment losses you may incur as a result of using the information provided herein. Remember that past investment returns may not be indicative of future returns.

Copyright © 1998-2017 ETFOptimize.com, a publication of Optimized Investments, Inc. All rights reserved.