ETFOptimize | High-performance ETF-based Investment Strategies

Quantitative strategies, Wall Street-caliber research, and insightful market analysis since 1998.


ETFOptimize | HOME
Close Window

Left-wing activism rampant in corporate shareholder proposal process: Report

A Securities and Exchange Commission process for approving shareholder proposals favors a left-wing bent in corporate policies, claims a watchdog, citing audits from 2018-2022.

FIRST ON FOX: The Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC) shareholder proposal approval process has been disproportionately pushing U.S. corporations' policies toward left-wing activism, according to a new report from Consumers' Research that published audits from 2018-2022. 

In December 2022, William Hild, the executive director of Consumers' Research – a nonprofit consumer research group – proposed a shareholder suggestion to ExxonMobil. Among five proposals submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for review, Hild's was the only one the SEC allowed ExxonMobil to exclude from its proxy materials sent to shareholders for their consideration. 

This raised questions for Consumers' Research about how political leanings affect these proposals.

TARGET, DICK'S SPORTING GOODS FACING PUSHBACK FROM INVESTORS FOR 'GOING WOKE'

"The long term consequences of this that we're already seeing is pushing corporate America in a more and more woke direction, where they are much more worried about catering to woke activists and woke politicians than to their own customers and to their shareholdersm" Hild told Fox News Digital in an interview this week.

The report, which audited over 1,000 shareholder proposals from 2018-2022, found that 64% of the conservative-aligned proposals requested for No-Action were granted, while liberal-aligned proposals were granted No-Action relief by the SEC 52% of the time.

During that period, there were 1,063 shareholder proposals aligned with liberal interests, 101 categorized as neutral, 87 aligned with conservative interests, and two with unknown alignment submitted.

"If conservative and liberal shareholders are not playing on the level playing field, what that means is there's a left-wing tilt to all of corporate America, because these proposals are very costly for the corporations to fight," Hild said. "They usually never lose a vote on them. What ends up happening is if it looks like they're going to lose, they start to capitulate and negotiate with their proposers."

"For example, Exxon has taken a net-zero pledge now, which means that they're going to spend money and time and focus to try and reduce their carbon output to zero by 2050, and that is a direct result of shareholder lobbying when it came through shareholder proposals," he added.

WALMART PROMOTES PRIDE MERCHANDISE AS TARGET SCALES BACK FOLLOWING BACKLASH

When a shareholder submits a proposal to be included in a company's proxy materials for a vote at the company's annual general meeting or special meeting, the company may seek guidance from the SEC on whether it can exclude the proposal. The company typically provides reasons for exclusion based on SEC regulations, such as if the proposal falls under certain exempted categories or if it violates SEC rules.

Receiving a No-Action letter allows the company to exclude the shareholder proposal from its proxy materials without facing potential legal consequences from the SEC for doing so. 

"As a result, conservatives have essentially ceded the ground to leftists," the report noted.

Companies that received No-Action letters for left-wing investor proposals include Black Rock Inc., Alphabet Inc., Amazon Inc., AT&T Inc., Best Buy Inc., Autozone Inc., Comcast Corporation, Exxonmobil Corporation, Johnson & Johnson, McDonald's Corporation, Pfizer Inc., among others. 

On Tuesday, BlackRock announced that it is partnering with a third proxy advisory firm to give its clients a wider range of investment counsel as critics suggested the mammoth asset manager is trying to make up for allegations that it leans into ESG (environmental, social, governance) tenets more than its fiduciary responsibilities merit.

TARGET ‘CAUTIOUS’ ON NEAR-TERM GROWTH OUTLOOK AS MORE AMERICANS ARE MAXING OUT CREDIT CARDS

In a release obtained by Fox News Digital on Monday, BlackRock officials said the firm remains committed to providing its clients with choices that support their growing range of investment preferences via its Voting Choice program.

"We continue to innovate and provide more choice to our clients who wish to take a more direct role in the proxy voting process," Joud Abdel Majeid, global head of BlackRock Investment Stewardship, said in the release. 

BlackRock declined to comment to Fox Business for this story. 

Meanwhile, some companies are pushing back against such agendas. Earlier this year, Ohio-based asset management company – Strive Asset Management – announced a new non-woke, anti-ESG shareholder-focused retirement plan for small businesses.

In addition, Major retailers Target and Dick's Sporting Goods will both face criticism over "woke" policies at their respective shareholder meetings on Wednesday, as activist investors ramp up pressure on companies amid raging culture wars in corporate America.

GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE

The National Center for Public Policy Research (NCPPR), a conservative think tank, plans to present proposals for a vote at each company, aimed at preventing the boards from making hyper-political decisions in the future, arguing that they have taken controversial positions at shareholders' expense.

Fox Business has reached out to the SEC for comment.

Fox News' Breck Dumas and Brandon Gillespie contributed to this report. 

Data & News supplied by www.cloudquote.io
Stock quotes supplied by Barchart
Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes.
By accessing this page, you agree to the following
Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.


 

IntelligentValue Home
Close Window

DISCLAIMER

All content herein is issued solely for informational purposes and is not to be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor should it be interpreted as a recommendation to buy, hold or sell (short or otherwise) any security.  All opinions, analyses, and information included herein are based on sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty of any kind, expressed or implied, is made including but not limited to any representation or warranty concerning accuracy, completeness, correctness, timeliness or appropriateness. We undertake no obligation to update such opinions, analysis or information. You should independently verify all information contained on this website. Some information is based on analysis of past performance or hypothetical performance results, which have inherent limitations. We make no representation that any particular equity or strategy will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. Shareholders, employees, writers, contractors, and affiliates associated with ETFOptimize.com may have ownership positions in the securities that are mentioned. If you are not sure if ETFs, algorithmic investing, or a particular investment is right for you, you are urged to consult with a Registered Investment Advisor (RIA). Neither this website nor anyone associated with producing its content are Registered Investment Advisors, and no attempt is made herein to substitute for personalized, professional investment advice. Neither ETFOptimize.com, Global Alpha Investments, Inc., nor its employees, service providers, associates, or affiliates are responsible for any investment losses you may incur as a result of using the information provided herein. Remember that past investment returns may not be indicative of future returns.

Copyright © 1998-2017 ETFOptimize.com, a publication of Optimized Investments, Inc. All rights reserved.