ETFOptimize | High-performance ETF-based Investment Strategies

Quantitative strategies, Wall Street-caliber research, and insightful market analysis since 1998.


ETFOptimize | HOME
Close Window

NFL to pay $4 billion in 'Sunday Ticket' antitrust case, jury rules

"NFL Sunday Ticket" allows subscribers to view games outside of their market, that are otherwise unavailable. Plaintiffs alleged the packages were sold at an inflated cost.

A jury reached a verdict in the long-running "NFL Sunday Ticket" antitrust lawsuit. The suit centered around the strategies the NFL uses as it relates to the distribution of its television broadcasts. 

A group of plaintiffs who purchased the broadcast package received a $4.7 billion judgment from the jury. Meanwhile, a separate group of bar owners were awarded $96 million in U.S. District Court in the Central District of California on Thursday. 

Per federal antitrust law, the total damages could escalate and potentially surpass the $14 billion threshold. 

CLICK HERE FOR MORE SPORTS COVERAGE ON FOXBUSINESS.COM

The league released a statement, saying it was "disappointed" by the verdict.

"We are disappointed with the jury’s verdict today in the NFL Sunday Ticket class-action lawsuit," the NFL said in a statement. "We continue to believe that our media distribution strategy, which features all NFL games broadcast on free over-the-air television in the markets of the participating teams and national distribution of our most popular games, supplemented by many additional choices including RedZone, Sunday Ticket and NFL+, is by far the most fan friendly distribution model in all of sports and entertainment."

The NFL also said it will file an appeal.

NETFLIX LANDS THREE-SEASON NFL DEAL, WILL STREAM CHRISTMAS DAY DOUBLEHEADER

Prior to YouTube TV winning the rights to Sunday Ticket, the broadcast package was held by DirecTV. The service broadcasts the league's out-of-market games.

A San Francisco sports bar initially filed a lawsuit in 2015, alleging the NFL broke antitrust law by only presenting the league's out-of-market games in a bundle instead of offering a one-team package. The case was dismissed in 2017, but it was reinstated around two years later.

It was later designated as a class-action lawsuit and included millions of bars, restaurants and subscribers.

VIEW MOMENT ON X

NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell was called as a witness and ended up being on the stand for almost four hours. During his lengthy testimony in federal court this month, Goodell defended the league's broadcast model and described "Sunday Ticket" as a "premium product."

"We have been clear throughout that it is a premium product, not just on pricing but quality," Goodell said during cross-examination. "Fans make that choice whether they wanted it or not. I'm sure there were fans who said it was too costly."

The suit also alleged the league inflated the price of its "NFL Sunday Ticket" package. On YouTubeTV, the package is currently available for $349 per year.

According to Front Office Sports, the NFL previously declined a proposal that could have dropped the offering for the 2023 season to $70. Additional information during the trial revealed that single-team packages were also included in the proposal. However, the deal would have required the NFL to relinquish control of the service.

Data & News supplied by www.cloudquote.io
Stock quotes supplied by Barchart
Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes.
By accessing this page, you agree to the following
Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.


 

IntelligentValue Home
Close Window

DISCLAIMER

All content herein is issued solely for informational purposes and is not to be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor should it be interpreted as a recommendation to buy, hold or sell (short or otherwise) any security.  All opinions, analyses, and information included herein are based on sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty of any kind, expressed or implied, is made including but not limited to any representation or warranty concerning accuracy, completeness, correctness, timeliness or appropriateness. We undertake no obligation to update such opinions, analysis or information. You should independently verify all information contained on this website. Some information is based on analysis of past performance or hypothetical performance results, which have inherent limitations. We make no representation that any particular equity or strategy will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. Shareholders, employees, writers, contractors, and affiliates associated with ETFOptimize.com may have ownership positions in the securities that are mentioned. If you are not sure if ETFs, algorithmic investing, or a particular investment is right for you, you are urged to consult with a Registered Investment Advisor (RIA). Neither this website nor anyone associated with producing its content are Registered Investment Advisors, and no attempt is made herein to substitute for personalized, professional investment advice. Neither ETFOptimize.com, Global Alpha Investments, Inc., nor its employees, service providers, associates, or affiliates are responsible for any investment losses you may incur as a result of using the information provided herein. Remember that past investment returns may not be indicative of future returns.

Copyright © 1998-2017 ETFOptimize.com, a publication of Optimized Investments, Inc. All rights reserved.