ETFOptimize | High-performance ETF-based Investment Strategies

Quantitative strategies, Wall Street-caliber research, and insightful market analysis since 1998.


ETFOptimize | HOME
Close Window

Washington Post paying for ads on X featuring pro-Democrat, anti-Trump content, critics say

Critics are drawing attention to The Washington Post's ads on X and how they skew in favor of Democrats while always being negative about Republicans.

The Washington Post has come under fire from critics who allege its ads on X are politically skewed in amplifying pro-Harris and anti-Trump content. 

In recent weeks, conservatives have shared screenshots of posts from the "Democracy Dies in Darkness" paper of articles that were being monetized as ads. 

One was an excerpt from an op-ed by President Biden touting his court reform proposal, with the quote, "We can and must prevent the abuse of presidential power. We can and must restore the public's faith in the Supreme Court. We can and must strengthen the guardrails of democracy." 

"Is the @washingtonpost going to register with the FEC to run ads like this?" GOP strategist Matt Whitlock asked. "What is this ridiculous promotion of Biden’s desperate and stupid court-packing plan? You can’t even argue this is good for WaPo business because a boring op-ed isn’t driving new subscribers."

WASHINGTON POST'S TAYLOR LORENZ SAYS BIDEN ‘WAR CRIMINAL’ POST WAS AN ‘OBVIOUS MEME’ AFTER CLAIMING IT WAS EDITED

Another one that was flagged was an article about Ohio Sen. JD Vance's "rocky debut" as former President Trump's running mate with the post reading, "JD Vance has had a challenging start as the GOP's vice-presidential nominee, leaving the Trump campaign to try to clean up his controversial past comments."

Donald Trump Jr. reacted with a screenshot of a third post offering glowing coverage of Vice President Kamala Harris that read, "Throughout her life, Kamala Harris has had her share of firsts. Now, her next first could be the presidency."

"While the @washingtonpost is spending thousands of dollars running paid ads attacking JD Vance, they're also running positive ads promoting Kamala Harris," Trump Jr. wrote. "How is this any different than a Super PAC? The Washington Post should be forced to register with the @FEC. So corrupt!!!"

LIBERAL WASHINGTON POST EDITORIAL BOARD HAS SCATHING TAKE ON HARRIS' ECONOMIC PLAN: ‘POPULIST GIMMICKS’

A source familiar with the matter told Fox News Digital that high-performing posts shared on X by The Post are later promoted as ads. The paper's far-left readership is likely driving the partisan nature of its ads. 

Ruthless podcast co-host Michael Duncan took aim at a Post ad fact-checking Vance's claims against Harris.

"How is this not an in-kind contribution to her campaign?" Duncan wondered.

WAPO REPORTER SUGGESTS WHITE HOUSE CENSOR ‘MISINFORMATION’ FROM TRUMP-MUSK INTERVIEW DURING PRESS BRIEFING

Other posts X users flagged include one that read, "Donald Trump has grown increasingly angry about Kamala Harris’s surging poll numbers and media coverage since replacing Joe Biden on the ticket." Another ad pushed the "Republicans pounce" trope against Harris' running mate, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, over his scrutinized military service claims.

Vance himself slammed the Post's ads targeting him and Trump. 

"You'll see The Washington Post pay for advertisements for stories that attack me and attack Donald J. Trump," Vance told Fox News' Laura Ingraham on Thursday. "That's not the activity of a media organization. That's the activity of a SuperPAC. And I hope the FEC looks into it."

Fox News Digital reached out to The Washington Post for comment. 

Data & News supplied by www.cloudquote.io
Stock quotes supplied by Barchart
Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes.
By accessing this page, you agree to the following
Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.


 

IntelligentValue Home
Close Window

DISCLAIMER

All content herein is issued solely for informational purposes and is not to be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor should it be interpreted as a recommendation to buy, hold or sell (short or otherwise) any security.  All opinions, analyses, and information included herein are based on sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty of any kind, expressed or implied, is made including but not limited to any representation or warranty concerning accuracy, completeness, correctness, timeliness or appropriateness. We undertake no obligation to update such opinions, analysis or information. You should independently verify all information contained on this website. Some information is based on analysis of past performance or hypothetical performance results, which have inherent limitations. We make no representation that any particular equity or strategy will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. Shareholders, employees, writers, contractors, and affiliates associated with ETFOptimize.com may have ownership positions in the securities that are mentioned. If you are not sure if ETFs, algorithmic investing, or a particular investment is right for you, you are urged to consult with a Registered Investment Advisor (RIA). Neither this website nor anyone associated with producing its content are Registered Investment Advisors, and no attempt is made herein to substitute for personalized, professional investment advice. Neither ETFOptimize.com, Global Alpha Investments, Inc., nor its employees, service providers, associates, or affiliates are responsible for any investment losses you may incur as a result of using the information provided herein. Remember that past investment returns may not be indicative of future returns.

Copyright © 1998-2017 ETFOptimize.com, a publication of Optimized Investments, Inc. All rights reserved.