Oakland County Personal Protection Order Lawyer Paul J. Tafelski of Michigan Defense Law Clarifies Key Differences Between Protective Orders

July 21, 2025 at 17:26 PM EDT

Understanding the legal landscape surrounding protective orders is essential, particularly for those entangled in legal proceedings. Oakland County personal protection order lawyer Paul J. Tafelski (https://www.michigandefenselaw.com/blog/difference-no-contact-orders-protection-orders-restraining-orders/) of Michigan Defense Law offers much-needed insight into how no-contact orders, personal protection orders (PPOs), and restraining orders function differently under Michigan law. While these terms are often used interchangeably, they are governed by distinct laws and serve different purposes.

For individuals facing one of these court-imposed restrictions, knowing the specific type of order issued is critical. Oakland County personal protection order lawyer Paul J. Tafelski points out that “a no-contact order is typically a condition of bond, and that’s set by the judge as soon as there’s a formal charge filed in almost every domestic violence case.” This type of order is rooted in the criminal process and is usually applied immediately following an arrest. On the other hand, PPOs and restraining orders stem from civil proceedings and can be initiated independently of any criminal charges.

Each type of order has a similar effect in practice: limiting communication and proximity between individuals. But their legal implications diverge significantly. Oakland County personal protection order lawyer Paul J. Tafelski explains that a PPO can be obtained without the involvement of police or prosecutors, simply based on credible allegations of threats, stalking, or violence. Violations can result in immediate arrest, with penalties including jail time and fines. A restraining order, meanwhile, is often issued in family law cases and may not result in arrest but is enforced through civil contempt proceedings.

These distinctions matter because they determine how the law will treat violations. According to Paul J. Tafelski, the legal burden largely falls on the defendant, regardless of who initiates contact. “It happens quite a bit,” he says, referring to situations where an alleged victim contacts the defendant. “It doesn’t get them in any trouble—it gets the defendant in trouble because if you violate the no-contact order then they can revoke your bonds.”

Courts in Michigan often impose no-contact orders automatically once charges are filed, and these orders cannot usually be lifted without the consent of the alleged victim. Even if both parties wish to resume contact, the decision ultimately lies with the judge. This makes it essential for defendants to adhere strictly to court directives, regardless of the actions or wishes of the other party involved.

Adding to the complexity, PPOs typically last up to one year but can be extended if the court deems it necessary. No-contact orders, by contrast, generally remain in effect for the duration of criminal proceedings or probation. The varying durations and the conditions of enforcement make it even more important to understand the nature of the order received.

A particularly critical point raised by Tafelski is the one-sided nature of enforcement: if a defendant responds to a message or call from the protected party, the defendant alone is held responsible. The court treats this as a violation, potentially leading to bond revocation or additional charges. Tafelski underscores that even indirect communication—such as through social media or mutual acquaintances—can trigger legal consequences.

For those served with any type of protective order, the consequences of non-compliance can be severe. Jail time, additional charges, and stricter legal conditions can follow even unintentional violations. As Tafelski notes, “Sometimes things work out, and sometimes they don’t, and people have to be aware of what can go wrong.”

Individuals dealing with these situations are encouraged to seek guidance promptly. An attorney can help clarify the nature of the order, advocate for modifications if necessary, and ensure that their client remains in compliance with all court-imposed conditions.

Taking swift, informed legal action can make a significant difference in the outcome of a case. Understanding the distinctions among no-contact orders, PPOs, and restraining orders not only helps individuals navigate the system more effectively but also protects them from unintended legal pitfalls.

To avoid further complications, anyone served with a no-contact order or a personal protection order in Michigan should consult with an attorney immediately. Paul J. Tafelski of Michigan Defense Law is available to help individuals evaluate their legal options and develop a defense strategy aimed at minimizing legal risk while protecting their rights.

About Michigan Defense Law:

Michigan Defense Law provides legal representation to individuals facing criminal charges or dealing with related court orders, such as no-contact or personal protection orders. Led by attorney Paul J. Tafelski, the firm focuses on helping clients understand the legal process and advocating on their behalf to reach the most favorable outcomes.

Embeds:

Youtube Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p38U6nHldMM

GMB: https://www.google.com/maps?cid=7441820969606749572

Email and website

Email: paul@michigandefenselaw.com

Website: https://www.michigandefenselaw.com/

Media Contact
Company Name: Michigan Defense Law
Contact Person: Paul J. Tafelski
Email: Send Email
Phone: (248) 451-2200
Address:2525 S Telegraph Rd suite 100
City: Bloomfield Hills
State: Michigan 48302
Country: United States
Website: https://www.michigandefenselaw.com/

About Us

About Cabling Installation & Maintenance

Contact Cabling Installation & Maintenance

Editorial

Advertising and Sponsorship Sales

Subscriptions and Memberships

Feedback/Problems

Oakland County Personal Protection Order Lawyer Paul J. Tafelski of Michigan Defense Law Clarifies Key Differences Between Protective Orders

More News