Laser Focus World is an industry bedrock—first published in 1965 and still going strong. We publish original articles about cutting-edge advances in lasers, optics, photonics, sensors, and quantum technologies, as well as test and measurement, and the shift currently underway to usher in the photonic integrated circuits, optical interconnects, and copackaged electronics and photonics to deliver the speed and efficiency essential for data centers of the future.

Our 80,000 qualified print subscribers—and 130,000 12-month engaged online audience—trust us to dive in and provide original journalism you won’t find elsewhere covering key emerging areas such as laser-driven inertial confinement fusion, lasers in space, integrated photonics, chipscale lasers, LiDAR, metasurfaces, high-energy laser weaponry, photonic crystals, and quantum computing/sensors/communications. We cover the innovations driving these markets.

Laser Focus World is part of Endeavor Business Media, a division of EndeavorB2B.

Laser Focus World Membership

Never miss any articles, videos, podcasts, or webinars by signing up for membership access to Laser Focus World online. You can manage your preferences all in one place—and provide our editorial team with your valued feedback.

Magazine Subscription

Can you subscribe to receive our print issue for free? Yes, you sure can!

Newsletter Subscription

Laser Focus World newsletter subscription is free to qualified professionals:

The Daily Beam

Showcases the newest content from Laser Focus World, including photonics- and optics-based applications, components, research, and trends. (Daily)

Product Watch

The latest in products within the photonics industry. (9x per year)

Bio & Life Sciences Product Watch

The latest in products within the biophotonics industry. (4x per year)

Laser Processing Product Watch

The latest in products within the laser processing industry. (3x per year)

Get Published!

If you’d like to write an article for us, reach out with a short pitch to Sally Cole Johnson: [email protected]. We love to hear from you.

Photonics Hot List

Laser Focus World produces a video newscast that gives a peek into what’s happening in the world of photonics.

Following the Photons: A Photonics Podcast

Following the Photons: A Photonics Podcast dives deep into the fascinating world of photonics. Our weekly episodes feature interviews and discussions with industry and research experts, providing valuable perspectives on the issues, technologies, and trends shaping the photonics community.

Editorial Advisory Board

  • Professor Andrea M. Armani, University of Southern California
  • Ruti Ben-Shlomi, Ph.D., LightSolver
  • James Butler, Ph.D., Hamamatsu
  • Natalie Fardian-Melamed, Ph.D., Columbia University
  • Justin Sigley, Ph.D., AmeriCOM
  • Professor Birgit Stiller, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Light, and Leibniz University of Hannover
  • Professor Stephen Sweeney, University of Glasgow
  • Mohan Wang, Ph.D., University of Oxford
  • Professor Xuchen Wang, Harbin Engineering University
  • Professor Stefan Witte, Delft University of Technology

ESG investing is not so divisive when choices are presented in better ways

ESG investing is not so divisive when choices are presented in better ways

The political backlash against environmental, social and governance investing has sent much of financial industry into retreat. But new research from a fellow at the Stanford Rock Center for Corporate Governance finds that the red-blue gap in attitudes toward ESG can be narrowed when investment choices are presented in better ways.

ESG investing has become a flashpoint in American politics, reflecting the broader ideological polarization gripping the country, writes Omar Vásquez Duque. While Republican-led states have enacted laws banning or restricting ESG considerations in public pension funds, Democratic-led states have embraced ESG as a tool to promote social and environmental goals.

“This contentious landscape raises a critical question: Are these legislative actions and corporate decisions reflective of the actual preferences of pension beneficiaries?” he asks. “My research reveals that despite political polarization, there is more consensus on social sustainability than commonly believed—if we present it in the right way.”

The study is based on two survey experiments with representative samples of the United States population with respect to gender and age.  The first survey essentially asked people how much they would be willing to pay for a product. The second presented people with different options that ideally resemble real-world trade-offs.

To measure participants’ preferences for ESG investing, the study used a series of decision tasks where respondents chose between two hypothetical pension fund options. Each option included an expected annual pension amount and several investment restrictions, such as avoiding companies tied to fossil fuels or gambling.

Each participant made 12 such decisions. The first experiment involved 2,120 participants and included fairly detailed descriptions of investment restrictions—e.g., fund A only invests in firms with a compliance program to minimize the risk of having children working within their supply chain. The second experiment, with 1,086 participants, used broader categories of restrictions—e.g., fund A does not invest in companies that do not abide by the United Nations labor rights standards.

ESG investing is not so divisive when choices are presented in better ways
Stanford University photo

“The results challenge the idea that ESG investing is inherently partisan. While Democrats broadly supported social and environmental objectives, Republicans also showed strong preferences for some social goals,” Duque wrote.

The phrasing was key. Abstract concepts like “labor rights,” which some may associate with a political agenda, led conservative respondents to prioritize profitability over social goals. Yet, when social causes were presented in more detail—such as “guaranteeing living wages”—support grew across the political spectrum.

Three ESG investment restrictions drew significant bipartisan support:

  1. Excluded companies that may employ children
  2. Supported companies that advocate for equal pay between men and women
  3. Favored companies ensuring their workers earn enough to avoid poverty.

“People may well have a strong preference for some social goals but dislike environmental restrictions. The term ESG lumps together diverse objectives—environmental, social and governance—into a single concept. This one-size-fits-all approach prevents many individuals from aligning their investments with their values and fuels misconceptions about what ESG entails,” Duque said.

“Many participants—even conservatives and those who in principle oppose ESG investing—are willing to accept lower returns to support specific social objectives,” Duque said in an article on the Promarket website from the University of Chicago’s Booth School.

Ream more: Millennials will power the impact investing market to $1.3 trillion by 2029

Stock Quote API & Stock News API supplied by www.cloudquote.io
Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes.
By accessing this page, you agree to the following
Privacy Policy and Terms Of Service.