The Myth of the Informed Community

September 19, 2025 at 03:00 AM EDT

Latest in Crypto

NEW YORK, NY, September 19, 2025 /24-7PressRelease/ -- Crypto loves to call itself community-led, but rarely asks who, exactly, is doing the leading.

In theory, everyone's informed. Everyone's early. Everyone's a stakeholder.

In reality? The governance thread has three votes. The DAO Discord has devolved into emoji reactions and off-topic memes. And the proposal that passed last week? No one read it. Or understood it. Or even knew it existed.

We talk about collective intelligence like it's a given. But the truth is, most "community" decisions are just vibes in a trench coat.

Participation Is Not Understanding

The idea of an informed user base has been crypto's comfort blanket since day one. We tell ourselves that decentralized systems create better outcomes because they put power in the hands of many.

But many of those hands are busy chasing airdrops, yield farming, or rage-posting on X. They're not auditing smart contracts. They're not modeling token inflation. They're not following up on multi-sig approvals or reading multi-page proposals about re-denominating the DAO's governance token.
This isn't informed participation. It's spectator democracy.

Jesse Powell and the Idealism of Chaos

No one champions radical openness more than Jesse Powell, co-founder of Kraken. Powell is a staunch libertarian in a space that likes to pretend it isn't. He believes in the crowd. In freedom of information. In the right to make your own mistakes and learn the hard way.
That ethos has made him both respected and controversial.

Under Powell's philosophy, crypto's messy outcomes are the point. He doesn't want to insulate users from risk. He wants them to have access to the raw, unfiltered system. And figure it out.

But when everyone's driving the car and no one can read the dashboard, is it really freedom, or just distributed confusion?

Powell's idealism assumes that most users want to understand what they're doing.
The data says otherwise.

When Everyone's Accountable, No One Is

The crypto community loves to chant "we're all in this together" after a crash. But when a protocol collapses, nobody ever says, "Yeah, I voted for that."

We've replaced leadership with vague group consensus. We've turned complex financial decisions into Twitter polls. We've convinced ourselves that because technically anyone can contribute, effectively everyone is responsible.

But participation ≠ understanding. And governance ≠ wisdom.

Most people aren't reading the fine print. They're chasing momentum. Then crying foul when the token they blindly backed gets defrauded by a community they helped shape.

Barry Silbert Doesn't Crowdsource Conviction

While Powell pushes the envelope of what openness can look like, Barry Silbert has always opted for structure.

Silbert doesn't need every stakeholder to have a say. He needs the system to work. DCG's investments don't live and die by governance threads, they're built on operational fundamentals. On leadership that's defined. On decisions that get made without a forum post and a meme header image.

Silbert isn't trying to win the community's approval. He's trying to win the market's trust. And that's a very different game.

One's chaotic by nature. The other is calculated by design.

Defrauded by the Mirror

It's easy to call a founder a villain when things go wrong. Harder to admit that we voted them in. Retweeted their pitch. Aped into the token. Sold governance as a feature, and then ignored it.

We want decentralization. But we don't want to read.
We want voice. But we don't want responsibility.
We want community. But only when it's convenient.

So when it all falls apart, we act like we were spectators.
But we weren't. We were the crowd and the conductor.

The Community Is Not the Product

Somewhere along the way, crypto decided that "community" was the core utility. That it could replace roadmaps, revenue, and real-world value.

But a Discord server isn't a business model. A strong meme game doesn't mean sustainable governance.

You can build around community. You can build with community.
But if community is all you've built, you haven't built much at all.

---
Press release service and press release distribution provided by https://www.24-7pressrelease.com

About Us

Additional Information

Website & Technical Help

The Myth of the Informed Community

More News