About Us

The Oil & Gas Journal, first published in 1902, is the world's most widely read petroleum industry publication. OGJ delivers international oil and gas industry news; analysis of issues and events; practical technology for design, operation, and maintenance of oil and gas operations; and important statistics on energy markets and industry activity.

OGJ is edited to meet the needs of engineers, geoscientists, managers, and executives throughout the oil and gas industry. It is part of Endeavor Business Media, Nashville, Tenn., which also publishes Offshore Magazine.

Endeavor Business Media’s Petroleum Group also produces targeted e-Newsletters; hosts global conferences and exhibitions, seminars, and forums; and publishes directories, technical books, print and electronic databases, surveys, and maps.

Additional Information

Website & Technical Help

For help with subscription purchases or refunds, or trouble logging into the paid subscription content on www.ogj.com, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or call 1-847-559-7598.

For more customer service information, please click here.

Unveiling the Most Infamous Hacker Attacks in the Crypto Space

Dubai, UAE, 14th June 2024, The world of cryptocurrency has attracted a diverse group of people, ranging from enthusiastic supporters to those who, unfortunately, aim to exploit the system. Throughout its relatively brief existence, the crypto industry has experienced numerous instances of malicious activity, resulting in some of its most infamous hacker attacks. Let’s explore the most well-known hacker attacks in the blockchain space and how they have affected the industry and its development. 

Mt. Gox Hack 

The Mt. Gox hack is still one of the most notorious events in the history of cryptocurrency assets. When it collapsed in February 2014, there were valid concerns that it could potentially devastate the emerging cryptocurrency ecosystem at a time when Bitcoin was not even five years old. 

Mt. Gox reached its pinnacle as the world’s largest Bitcoin exchange, processing more than 70% of all Bitcoin transactions. As a result, the abrupt suspension of withdrawals by the exchange in February 2014 due to technical issues came as a shocking development for users. The analysis later revealed that Mt. Gox had suffered a loss of over 880,000 Bitcoins due to a prolonged, systematic hacking incident that went unnoticed for many years. This hacking incident led to the bankruptcy of Mt. Gox and triggered widespread panic and even a loss of trust in the successful future of crypto. 

The attackers and whether one attacker consistently targeted over the span of these years or multiple attackers in various instances remain a mystery. Furthermore, the methods employed by the attacker are more a matter of suspicion than facts. In the case of the breach in June 2011, it has been verified that the hacker could gain entry to the Mt. Gox server using an account with administrator-level privileges. However, how they obtained access to such an account has yet to be determined.

Mark Karpeles, the CEO of Mt. Gox, denied any knowledge of ongoing attacks and the role that his approach to storing funds played in them. Afterward, Karpeles attributed the withdrawal problems in 2014 to the “transaction malleability” bug. Still, the deficiency in the available information prevented experts and the crypto community from analyzing the incident and confirming or denying any theories. It is hoped that this widely discussed incident has led many crypto enthusiasts to be more cautious about the products and services they choose to use.

The DAO Hack 

The DAO, created on the Ethereum blockchain, was a groundbreaking project aiming to raise funds for Ethereum-based ventures in a decentralized fashion. It attracted significant attention and managed to gather well over $130 million. However, in June 2016, an unidentified attacker exploited the DAO’s code and stole nearly all those funds over a few weeks. Fortunately, a team of “white hat” Ethereum hackers managed to employ the same exploit against the attacker, successfully recouping a substantial portion of the stolen funds, but not all of it.

The Ethereum community was divided by heated arguments, trying to decide how to react to the attack. The DAO had grown to be such a highly funded initiative that it held approximately 14% of all ETHs in circulation at that time. Therefore, its collapse could lead to not just financial setbacks for investors but also significant repercussions for the developing Ethereum network. 

So, first, the soft fork and then the hard fork were suggested. After much deliberation, the latter was chosen, effectively rolling back the Ethereum network to before the DAO attack. This approach allowed the reallocation of ETHs collected by the DAO to a different smart contract so that investors could withdraw their funds.  The DAO’s cautionary tale significantly influenced the industry’s approach to security. 

Conclusion

The cryptocurrency industry has a long track record of prominent hacker breaches that have unsettled investor faith, eroded trust, and cast doubts on the safety of digital assets. Despite undoubtedly leaving a profound mark on the crypto sphere, these events have also offered essential lessons, compelling industry participants to focus on security and adopt far more cautious approaches.

Kinetex Network: Website | Kinetex dApp | Blog

Stock Quote API & Stock News API supplied by www.cloudquote.io
Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes.
By accessing this page, you agree to the following
Privacy Policy and Terms Of Service.