Prediction markets have a settlement problem, and social consensus is not going to fix it.

While platforms like Polymarket have proven massive demand for event-based trading, they have also exposed a structural weakness that limits institutional participation: resolution risk. When a market’s final outcome depends on human voters rather than deterministic data, professional liquidity providers treat that uncertainty as unquantifiable risk. Spreads widen, capital retreats, and markets remain cyclical.

Inframarkets is building an energy prediction market designed to eliminate this failure. By anchoring prediction markets resolution to machine-verifiable data through the Inframarkets Oracle System (IOS), and by focusing on event contracts that connect to deep global energy markets, Inframarkets introduces institutional-grade prediction markets with deterministic settlement, real-world hedgeability, and exchange-level execution on Solana.

The Liquidity Problem in Traditional Prediction Markets

Prediction markets have gained significant traction as a new financial primitive. However, sustained professional liquidity remains a persistent constraint. Many markets attract retail participation during high-profile political cycles or major sporting events, yet deep, consistent market-making is harder to achieve.

The core reason is settlement uncertainty. Market makers evaluate not only volume and volatility but also resolution risk. If the outcome of a contract can be disputed, delayed, or subjected to governance override, capital efficiency declines and spreads widen. Institutional-grade prediction markets require more than user activity. They require predictable settlement, reliable resolution mechanisms, and low legal ambiguity.

Social Truth and Resolution Risk: The Polymarket Comparison

Many traditional prediction markets rely on a social truth model for prediction markets resolution. External voting systems determine the final outcome of a market, introducing a human-in-the-loop dependency at the most critical point in the contract lifecycle: settlement.

The Polymarket comparison illustrates this issue clearly. Polymarket relies on UMA’s optimistic oracle for resolution in many of its markets. While the mechanism is functional, it introduces UMA resolution risk where token holders determine final outcomes. This structure can produce perceived conflicts of interest, dispute windows, and governance complexity – particularly during controversial or high-profile events. Professional desks treat this as unquantifiable tail risk.

For retail users, this friction may be acceptable. For professional liquidity providers, dispute risk directly affects capital allocation decisions. Institutional participants require deterministic outcomes tied to authoritative, machine-readable data sources – not governance votes.

Why Political and Sports Markets Lack Hedgeability

Another structural limitation of traditional prediction markets is hedgeability. Political or sports markets are nearly impossible to hedge externally. A market maker providing liquidity on an election outcome or a championship result has no correlated instrument in regulated venues to offset exposure.

This absence of hedgeable prediction markets increases risk asymmetrically. Without external instruments to balance positions, liquidity providers face directional exposure they cannot manage. As a result, spreads widen and participation becomes cyclical, surging around events and evaporating afterward.

Inframarkets takes a fundamentally different approach by focusing on event contracts tied to real-world energy markets. Energy markets are deeply connected to global commodity infrastructure. Power prices, natural gas benchmarks, renewable generation metrics, and weather-related indicators are referenced by existing financial and physical markets worldwide.

This makes energy prediction market structures inherently more hedgeable. A liquidity provider on an Inframarkets power contract can offset directional exposure using correlated instruments such as CME energy futures – something structurally impossible on a presidential election market. Hedgeable prediction markets support tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and sustainable professional participation.

The Inframarkets Oracle System (IOS): Deterministic Settlement by Design

At the center of the Inframarkets model is the Inframarkets Oracle System (IOS), a deterministic oracle system designed to anchor prediction markets resolution to machine-verifiable data rather than human consensus.

Each IOS-settled contract references:

• A clearly defined, authoritative data source (e.g., ERCOT real-time settlement point prices, EIA published benchmarks, or ISO generation data)
• A specific observation timestamp
• A predefined settlement rule
• A documented fallback policy for data unavailability or revision

The first officially published value at the specified timestamp from the designated source becomes the settlement reference. There is no subjective voting, no dispute window, and no governance override. Machine-verifiable resolution enhances transparency, auditability, and capital efficiency.

By replacing social truth with machine truth, Inframarkets strengthens the structural integrity of prediction markets. Settlement is rule-based and data-driven rather than governance-dependent. 

Energy as a Foundation for Institutional-Grade Prediction Markets

Energy markets present a distinct opportunity for prediction market evolution. Power volatility, renewable intermittency risk, transmission congestion, and demand variability generate measurable and frequent data points – creating a rich surface for contract design.

An energy prediction market built on observable outcomes transforms operational signals into tradable instruments. On-chain energy derivatives allow participants to take positions on clearly defined events such as price thresholds, generation metrics, or demand-response triggers.

Because these markets are tied to authoritative data and real-world infrastructure, they are fundamentally better suited for professional liquidity provision than narrative-driven event markets. Hedgeable prediction markets reduce counterparty anxiety and support sustainable, deep participation.

Solana Settlement and Performance

Inframarkets combines deterministic oracle logic with Solana settlement. By leveraging Solana,as  the most performant blockchain for high-throughput execution, the platform supports sub-second finality.

Solana settlement provides on-chain transparency and finality while maintaining exchange-level execution performance. This architecture enables institutional-grade prediction markets to operate with the responsiveness of a centralized exchange while preserving the auditability and composability of on-chain infrastructure.

The result is an integrated stack:

• Deterministic oracle resolution through the Inframarkets Oracle System (IOS)
• On-chain energy derivatives with machine-verifiable settlement
• Orderbook-based execution for professional trading workflows
• Solana settlement infrastructure for throughput and composability

From Speculation to Structured Markets

The next phase of prediction markets will be defined by two things: settlement integrity and liquidity sustainability. Platforms that solve both will capture institutional capital. Those that don’t will remain retail-cyclical.

Inframarkets addresses both by combining machine-verifiable data with hedgeable real-world markets. The Inframarkets Oracle System (IOS) introduces a deterministic oracle system that removes the ambiguity, dispute risk, and governance overhead that limit existing platforms. By focusing on energy prediction market structures that connect to global commodity infrastructure – rather than purely narrative events – Inframarkets is building a new on-chain energy derivative.

In the choice between social truth and machine truth, the long-term viability of prediction markets may depend on which model delivers greater certainty, deeper liquidity, and lower structural risk. Inframarkets positions machine-verifiable settlement as the foundation for that next phase.

Follow Inframarkets.io on X: https://x.com/Inframarkets
Follow Inframarkets.io on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/inframarkets/