NEW YORK, Oct. 12, 2022 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C., a nationally recognized shareholder rights law firm, reminds investors that class actions have been commenced on behalf of stockholders of Abbott Laboratories (NYSE: ABT), TuSimple Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: TSP), Kohlโs Corporation (NYSE: KSS), and Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc. (NASDAQ: BBBY). Stockholders have until the deadlines below to petition the court to serve as lead plaintiff. Additional information about each case can be found at the link provided.
Abbott Laboratories (NYSE: ABT)
Class Period: February 19, 2021 โ June 8, 2022
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: October 31, 2022
Abbott manufactures various forms of infant formula including formula sold under the brand names Similac, Alimentum, and EleCare. Prior to February 2022, Abbott had produced 40% of the United Statesโ infant formula. Of that amount, nearly half was produced in its manufacturing facility in Sturgis, MI.
On February 17, 2022, the US Food and Drug Administration (โFDAโ) announced it was investigating four consumer complaints of infant illness related to powdered infant formula produced by Abbott in Sturgis. The FDA stated that it had initiated an onsite inspection at the facility and to date had found several positive contamination results from environmental samples for a bacteria, Cronbacter sakazakii (โCronbacterโ), linked to infant illnesses and death. On the same day, Abbott issued a recall of certain infant formula products including the popular brands Similac, Alimentum, and EleCare, all manufactured in Sturgis.
On this news, the price of Abbott common stock declined by more than 3%.
Then, on March 22, 2022, the FDA release reports from its three inspections of the Sturgis facility conducted in September 2019, September 2021, and most recently between January 31, 2022 and March 18, 2022. The FDA stated that these reports โdo not constitute final FDA determinationsโ of specific violations, but highlighted that during its most recent inspection that (a) Abbott failed to establish process controls โdesigned to ensure that infant formula does not become adulterated due to the presence of microorganisms in the formula or in the processing environmentโ and (b) Abbott failed to โensure that all surfaces that contacted infant formula were maintained to product infant formula from being contaminated by any source.โ
On this news, Abbottโs stock price fell by an additional 4%.
On April 28, 2022, the FDA released a redacted copy of a whistleblower complaint sent to the FDA in October 2021, revealing that the issues disclosed in February and March 2022 were actually known to Abbott management far earlier. The whistleblower complaint identified numerous serious examples of misconduct by Abbott management at Sturgis including the falsification of testing records, the release of untested infant formula to the market, efforts to mislead the FDA during its 2019 inspection audit, the continuation of known deficient testing procedures, and an inability to trace products to properly implement recalls of affected pallets of formula.
On this news, Abbottโs stock price fell nearly 4%.
Finally, on June 8, 2022, investors learned that Abbott was aware of the whistleblowerโs formal allegations in early 2021, when it was reported that the FDA whistleblower had filed a complaint in February 2021 with the US Labor Departmentโs Occupational Safety & Health Administration (โOSHAโ) and that OSHA delivered that complaint to Abbott and the FDA during the same month.
On this news, Abbottโs stock price fell by an additional 3.5%, further damaging investors.
The Abbot class action lawsuit alleges that defendants put profitability ahead of childrenโs safety. During the Class Period, Abbott engaged in a scheme to maximize revenues and inflate its stock price while disregarding and then concealing lapses in safety protocols that were ultimately linked to serious infant illnesses and even deaths.
For more information on the Abbott class action go to: https://bespc.com/cases/ABT
TuSimple Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: TSP)
Class Period: April 15, 2021 โ August 1, 2022 or pursuant to the Companyโs April 15, 2021 IPO
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: October 31, 2022
TuSimple is the subject of aย Wall Street Journalย article published on August 1, 2022. The article alleges that one of the Companyโs autonomously driven trucks left its lane of travel without warning before striking a cement barricade. The article states that the accident โunderscores concerns that the autonomous-trucking company is risking safety on public roads in a rush to deliver driverless trucks to market.โ Although the Company attempted to blame human error, theย Journalย points out that โit was the autonomous-driving system that turned the wheel and that blaming the entire accident on human error is misleading.โ The article also reveals that the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration has launched a โsafety compliance investigation.โ
Based on this news, shares of TuSimple fell $0.97, or 9.7%, during intraday trading to close at $8.99 per share on August 1, 2022.
According to the complaint, the Company made false and misleading statements to the market. TuSimple overstated its commitment to safety and concealed significant problems with its technology. The Company rushed testing of its autonomous driving systems to bear its competitors to the market. The Company fostered a corporate culture that ignored safety in favor of ambitious delivery schedules. This culture made accidents during road testing more likely. Based on these facts, the Companyโs public statements were false and materially misleading throughout the class period. When the market learned the truth about TuSimple, investors suffered damages.
For more information on the TuSimple class action go to: https://bespc.com/cases/TSP
Kohlโs Corporation (NYSE: KSS)
Class Period: October 20, 2020 โ May 19, 2022
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: November 1, 2022
Kohlโs operates as a retail company in the U.S.ย The Company offers branded apparel, footwear, accessories, beauty, and home products through its stores and website.ย
In October 2020, Kohlโs announced that it had entered into a new strategic framework to โdrive top-line growth,โ โexpand operating margin,โ and become โthe most trusted retailer of choice for the active and casual lifestyleโ (the โStrategic Planโ).ย Specifically, the Strategic Plan featured โnew initiatives to position the company for long-term success,โ including โbe[ing] the destination for active, casual and beauty for the entire family from the most trusted brands, always delivering quality and discovery,โ โlead[ing] with loyalty and value through a best-in-class rewards program,โ and โoffer[ing] a differentiated omnichannel experience that is easy and inviting, no matter how customers want to shop.โย In addition, Kohlโs announced that the Company was โfocused on increasing profitability with a goal of expanding its operating margin to 7% to 8%.โย In announcing the Strategic Plan, the Company touted its purportedly strong foundation of customers, industry-leading loyalty and charge card programs, high volume of stores, and large and growing digital business.
On May 19, 2022, Kohlโs issued a press release announcing the Companyโs fiscal Q1 2022 results, reporting, among other items, a net sales figure expected to grow up to only 1% (compared to Wall Street consensus growth of 1.94%), earnings per share of $0.11 (missing estimates by $0.59), a revenue figure which only barely edged expectations, and the Companyโs decision to cut its full year earnings forecast.ย These results were at odds with the Defendantsโ representations regarding the successful execution of the Companyโs Strategic Plan, which was purportedly poised to drive top-line growth and position the Company for long-term success.ย ย Further, the press release quoted Kohlโs Chief Executive Officer Defendant Michelle Gass, who stated, in relevant part, โ[t]he year has started out below our expectations. Following a strong start to the quarter with positive low-single digits comps through late March, sales considerably weakened in April as we encountered macro headwinds related to lapping last yearโs stimulus and an inflationary consumer environment.โย
Then, on May 20, 2022, Macellum Advisors GP, LLC (โMacellumโ), โa long-term holder of nearly 5% of the outstanding common shares of Kohlโsโ, issued a statement addressing โ[t]his quarterโs extremely disappointing results,โ which Macellum attributed to a โflawed strategic plan and an inability to execute.โย Macellum also stated that โthe current Board appears to have withheld material information from shareholders about the state of Kohlโs in the lead-up to this yearโs pivotal annual meeting,โ which โsuggests to us a clear breach of fiduciary duty.โ
On this news, Kohlโs stock price fell $5.84 per share, or 12.97%, to close at $39.20 per share on May 20, 2022.
The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and misleading statements regarding the Companyโs business, operations, and compliance policies.ย Specifically, Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) Kohlโs Strategic Plan was not well tailored to achieving the Companyโs stated goals; (ii) the Defendants had likewise overstated the Companyโs success in executing its Strategic Plan; (iii) Kohlโs had deficient disclosure controls and procedures, internal control over financial reporting, and corporate governance mechanisms; (iv) as a result, the Companyโs Board was able to and did withhold material information from shareholders about the state of Kohlโs in the lead-up to the Companyโs annual meeting; (v) all the foregoing, once revealed, was likely to have a material negative impact on Kohlโs financial condition and reputation; and (vi) as a result, the Companyโs public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.
For more information on the Kohlโs class action go to: https://bespc.com/cases/KSS
Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc. (NASDAQ: BBBY)
Class Period: March 25, 2022 โ August 18, 2022
On March 6, 2022, through his investment firm RC Ventures LLC, Ryan Cohen, the billionaire co-founder of Chewy Inc. who also serves as chairman of GameStop Corp., sent a letter to Bed Bath & Beyondโs board which announced that he owned a 9.8% stake in Bed Bath & Beyond and in which he criticized the Companyโs management.
On this news Bed Bath & Beyond stock to closed 34% higher on March 7, 2022 compared to its close on March 4, 2022, the previous trading day, on extremely heavy trading volume.
On March 25, 2022, Bed Bath & Beyond added three new directors appointed by Ryan Cohenโs investment firm, RC Ventures LLC.
On August 15, 2022, Ryan Cohen, through his investment firm RC Ventures LLC, announced in an SEC filing purchases of over one million January 2023 call options with exercise prices at $60, $75, and $80โsignificantly higher than Bed Bath & Beyond shares were trading.
On this news, Bed Bath & Beyond stock closed 29% higher on August 16, 2022 compared to its close on August 15, 2022, on extremely heavy trading volume.
Then, on August 18, 2022, Ryan Cohen, through his investment firm RC Ventures LLC, announced that he would sell his entire stake in Bed Bath & Beyond. Also on August 18, 2022,ย Bloombergย published an article entitled โBed Bath & Beyond Taps Kirkland & Ellis for Help Addressing Debt Loadโ which revealed the Company hired a law firm for help with its debt.ย
On this news, Bed Bath & Beyond shares fell $4.53 per share, or 19%, to close at $18.55 per share on August 18, 2022, on extremely heavy trading volume. Bed Bath & Beyond shares continued to drop on August 19, 2022, falling $7.52 per share, or 40%, from its August 18, 2022 close, to close at $11.03 per share, on extremely heavy trading volume.
On August 19, 2022, Bed Bath & Beyond stock plunged to a new low of $9.68, dropping another 52.6% from the previous day.
Bed Bath & Beyondโs stock price continued to decline over the next two trading days, falling an additional 16.23% to close at $9.24 per share on August 22, 2022, and falling another 4.98% to close at $8.78 on August 23, 2022, dropping over 70% from August 17โs high price of $30 per share in five trading days after Defendants dumped their shares.
Insiders profited at least $110 million from their Insider sales from August 16 to August 17, 2022.
For more information on the Bed Bath & Beyond class action go to: https://bespc.com/cases/BBBY
About Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C.:
Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. is a nationally recognized law firm with offices in New York, California, and South Carolina. The firm represents individual and institutional investors in commercial, securities, derivative, and other complex litigation in state and federal courts across the country. For more information about the firm, please visit www.bespc.com. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.
Contact Information:
Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C.
Brandon Walker, Esq.
Melissa Fortunato, Esq.
(212) 355-4648
investigations@bespc.com
www.bespc.com
ย
