ETFOptimize | High-performance ETF-based Investment Strategies

Quantitative strategies, Wall Street-caliber research, and insightful market analysis since 1998.


ETFOptimize | HOME
Close Window

Belitsoft Reviews Top 3 Microsoft .NET Development Trends for March 2026

Belitsoft, a software development outsourcing and IT staff augmentation firm with over 20 years of experience building Microsoft .NET applications, today released its Q1 2026 .NET Development Trends Report. It highlights 3 key changes in Microsoft technology that will affect business operations, and AI plans.

"We wrote this report to answer the question tech leaders have: what do I need to decide, and by when?" said Dmitry Baraishuk, Chief Innovation Officer at Belitsoft. "The choices engineering teams make in the next 6 months will determine their ability to follow regulatory rules, and use AI for the next three years.”

1. .NET 8 reaches end of official Microsoft support

Microsoft will end official support for .NET 8/9 on November 10, 2026. This creates software update problems for engineers, but it poses a much bigger risk for business leaders. Running unsupported software threatens compliance with SOC 2 audits, ISO 27001 certification, and PCI-DSS requirements.

These failures can stop sales deals, cancel cyber insurance policies, and break customer contracts.

.NET 10 is available now as a long-term supported version. Planning the move now gives teams enough time to do the work properly. Waiting until Q3 leaves less time, guaranteeing a rushed process that will cause mistakes.

Any organization using .NET applications, whether built internally or provided by others, must speak with their engineering leaders about this before the end of April.

2. Microsoft Has Chosen Its Agentic AI Platform

Microsoft has stopped developing new features for Semantic Kernel and AutoGen, their older tools for building AI into applications, and put them in maintenance mode. They will keep fixing bugs, but no new work is going into them. If you create new AI features using these tools, think twice.

The replacement is the Microsoft Agent Framework. As of late March 2026, its core parts are nearly finished and stable. .NET teams don't need to wait for the final release to start building test projects.

The framework is built for the type of AI that companies need to stay ahead today: systems with multiple AI assistants working together. They can run one after another, at the same time, hand off tasks to each other, or work as a group. It lets you save where an AI paused, show text as it types it out, and easily require a human engineer to approve actions for sensitive tasks.

Importantly, it doesn't lock you into one brand. It works with Microsoft Foundry, Azure OpenAI, OpenAI, GitHub Copilot, Anthropic Claude, AWS Bedrock, and Ollama. It also follows the new rules that let different AI tools talk to each other backward and forward: A2A, AG-UI, and MCP.

.NET shops that already started building projects on Semantic Kernel or AutoGen need to rethink their plan right away. Companies that haven't started yet should realize that the choice of which tool to use is already made for them. The best time to start testing it is right now, before the final release makes it too hard to find engineers who know how to use it.

3. The Cost-Effective Path to AI-Ready Data Infrastructure

SQL Server still dominates enterprise .NET stacks. However, PostgreSQL is growing fast and often becomes the default database choice for new .NET projects.

The pgvector tool lets PostgreSQL store and search AI data in the exact same place as your normal data. The biggest cost in AI is storing everything. Using pgvector means you don't have to pay for, set up, or run a second database just for AI.

The current/latest version of that package no longer supports EF Core 8 and requires EF Core 10 or 9.

.NET shops that only use SQL Server 2025 or Azure SQL get the VECTOR_DISTANCE() function in EF Core 10. This gives you smart search without changing platforms.

If your team is building a new app with AI search or recommendations, just use PostgreSQL and pgvector. The cost disadvantage of a dedicated vector database becomes obvious at scale, unless there is a technical reason to use it.

About the Author:

Dmitry Baraishuk is a Partner and Chief Innovation Officer at Belitsoft. Belitsoft is a software engineering company specializing in Microsoft .NET development, AI integration, and enterprise application modernization. The company serves clients across healthcare, fintech, and enterprise SaaS in the US, UK, and Canada. Belitsoft publishes quarterly technology trend analyses to help business and technology leaders make informed decisions about their software investment strategy.

Media Contact
Company Name: Belitsoft
Contact Person: Dmitry Baraishuk
Email: Send Email
City: Warsaw
Country: Poland
Website: https://belitsoft.com/

Recent Quotes

View More
Symbol Price Change (%)
AMZN  207.24
-2.90 (-1.38%)
AAPL  251.64
+0.15 (0.06%)
AMD  205.37
+2.69 (1.33%)
BAC  48.14
+0.62 (1.30%)
GOOG  289.20
-9.82 (-3.28%)
META  592.92
-11.14 (-1.84%)
MSFT  372.74
-10.26 (-2.68%)
NVDA  175.20
-0.44 (-0.25%)
ORCL  147.09
-7.25 (-4.70%)
TSLA  383.03
+2.18 (0.57%)
Stock Quote API & Stock News API supplied by www.cloudquote.io
Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes.
By accessing this page, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms Of Service.


 

IntelligentValue Home
Close Window

DISCLAIMER

All content herein is issued solely for informational purposes and is not to be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor should it be interpreted as a recommendation to buy, hold or sell (short or otherwise) any security.  All opinions, analyses, and information included herein are based on sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty of any kind, expressed or implied, is made including but not limited to any representation or warranty concerning accuracy, completeness, correctness, timeliness or appropriateness. We undertake no obligation to update such opinions, analysis or information. You should independently verify all information contained on this website. Some information is based on analysis of past performance or hypothetical performance results, which have inherent limitations. We make no representation that any particular equity or strategy will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. Shareholders, employees, writers, contractors, and affiliates associated with ETFOptimize.com may have ownership positions in the securities that are mentioned. If you are not sure if ETFs, algorithmic investing, or a particular investment is right for you, you are urged to consult with a Registered Investment Advisor (RIA). Neither this website nor anyone associated with producing its content are Registered Investment Advisors, and no attempt is made herein to substitute for personalized, professional investment advice. Neither ETFOptimize.com, Global Alpha Investments, Inc., nor its employees, service providers, associates, or affiliates are responsible for any investment losses you may incur as a result of using the information provided herein. Remember that past investment returns may not be indicative of future returns.

Copyright © 1998-2017 ETFOptimize.com, a publication of Optimized Investments, Inc. All rights reserved.