ETFOptimize | High-performance ETF-based Investment Strategies

Quantitative strategies, Wall Street-caliber research, and insightful market analysis since 1998.


ETFOptimize | HOME
Close Window

Marsh & McLennan Stock Outlook: Is Wall Street Bullish or Bearish?

Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC), headquartered in New York, is a professional services company that provides advisory services and insurance solutions to clients in the areas of risk and strategy, as well as people worldwide. Valued at $89.6 billion by market cap, the company offers analysis, advice, and transactional capabilities.

Shares of this leading professional services firm have considerably underperformed the broader market over the past year. MMC has declined 18.6% over this time frame, while the broader S&P 500 Index ($SPX) has rallied nearly 13.7%. In 2025, MMC’s stock fell 14.9%, compared to the SPX’s 13.4% rise on a YTD basis. 

 

Narrowing the focus, MMC’s underperformance is also apparent compared to the SPDR S&P Insurance ETF (KIE). The exchange-traded fund has declined about 1.9% over the past year. Moreover, the ETF’s 3.2% returns on a YTD basis outshine the stock’s double-digit losses over the same time frame.

www.barchart.com

On Oct. 16, MMC shares closed down by 8.5% after reporting its Q3 results. Its adjusted EPS of $1.85 exceeded Wall Street expectations of $1.79. The company’s revenue was $6.4 billion, topping Wall Street forecasts of $6.3 billion.

For the current fiscal year, ending in December, analysts expect MMC’s EPS to grow 9.2% to $9.61 on a diluted basis. The company’s earnings surprise history is impressive. It beat the consensus estimate in each of the last four quarters.

Among the 23 analysts covering MMC stock, the consensus is a “Moderate Buy.” That’s based on five “Strong Buy” ratings, one “Moderate Buy,” 16 “Holds,” and one “Moderate Sell.”

www.barchart.com

This configuration is less bearish than a month ago, with a “Hold” rating overall, consisting of one analyst suggesting a “Strong Sell.”

On Nov. 3, TD Cowen analyst Andrew Kligerman kept a “Hold” rating on MMC and lowered the price target to $200, implying a potential upside of 10.6% from current levels.

The mean price target of $214.84 represents an 18.8% premium to MMC’s current price levels. The Street-high price target of $258 suggests an ambitious upside potential of 42.6%. 


On the date of publication, Neha Panjwani did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. For more information please view the Barchart Disclosure Policy here.

 

More news from Barchart

Recent Quotes

View More
Symbol Price Change (%)
AMZN  217.14
+0.00 (0.00%)
AAPL  266.25
+0.00 (0.00%)
AMD  206.02
+0.00 (0.00%)
BAC  51.00
+0.00 (0.00%)
GOOG  289.98
+0.00 (0.00%)
META  589.15
+0.00 (0.00%)
MSFT  478.43
+0.00 (0.00%)
NVDA  180.64
+0.00 (0.00%)
ORCL  210.69
+0.00 (0.00%)
TSLA  395.23
+0.00 (0.00%)
Stock Quote API & Stock News API supplied by www.cloudquote.io
Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes.
By accessing this page, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms Of Service.


 

IntelligentValue Home
Close Window

DISCLAIMER

All content herein is issued solely for informational purposes and is not to be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor should it be interpreted as a recommendation to buy, hold or sell (short or otherwise) any security.  All opinions, analyses, and information included herein are based on sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty of any kind, expressed or implied, is made including but not limited to any representation or warranty concerning accuracy, completeness, correctness, timeliness or appropriateness. We undertake no obligation to update such opinions, analysis or information. You should independently verify all information contained on this website. Some information is based on analysis of past performance or hypothetical performance results, which have inherent limitations. We make no representation that any particular equity or strategy will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. Shareholders, employees, writers, contractors, and affiliates associated with ETFOptimize.com may have ownership positions in the securities that are mentioned. If you are not sure if ETFs, algorithmic investing, or a particular investment is right for you, you are urged to consult with a Registered Investment Advisor (RIA). Neither this website nor anyone associated with producing its content are Registered Investment Advisors, and no attempt is made herein to substitute for personalized, professional investment advice. Neither ETFOptimize.com, Global Alpha Investments, Inc., nor its employees, service providers, associates, or affiliates are responsible for any investment losses you may incur as a result of using the information provided herein. Remember that past investment returns may not be indicative of future returns.

Copyright © 1998-2017 ETFOptimize.com, a publication of Optimized Investments, Inc. All rights reserved.