ETFOptimize | High-performance ETF-based Investment Strategies

Quantitative strategies, Wall Street-caliber research, and insightful market analysis since 1998.


ETFOptimize | HOME
Close Window

Wall Street Is Betting on Nuclear Energy, But Legendary Investor Peter Thiel Just Ditched This 1 Key Power Stock

Renowned investor Peter Thiel sold his entire stake in electricity producer Vistra Energy (VST) in the third quarter, a recent SEC filing showed. Vistra's nuclear plants currently produce about 6.6 gigawatts of power, and the Street has been excited about nuclear plants' ability to power data centers amid the AI Revolution.

Indeed, the combination of the Trump administration's pro-nuclear stance and the proliferation of power-hungry data centers could enable many nuclear-power producers, including VST, to generate huge profits over the long term. But on the other hand, Thiel's move is one of several signs that VST stock may have become overvalued. 

 

About Vistra

According to Vistra, it is the “largest competitive power generator in the U.S., with approximately 44,000 megawatts of capacity.” It has 5 million retail customers and also provides power to businesses, while its customers are located “from California to Maine.” In the third quarter, the company's operating revenues fell to $4.97 billion versus $6.3 billion during the same period a year earlier. The decline was likely partially due to an outage at the company's Martin Lake Unit 1 power plant. However, Vistra's adjusted EBITDA from ongoing operations increased to $1.58 billion last quarter from $1.44 billion in Q3 of 2024. In the first nine months of the year, Vistra's EBITDA from ongoing operations climbed to $4.17 billion from $3.66 billion during the same period of 2024. 

In September, the company reported that it would build two new natural gas power units with a total capacity of 860 MW. Additionally, VST noted, also in September, that it had agreed to supply 1,200 megawatts of power for 20 years from its Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant to “a large, investment-grade company.” The company expects to start supplying electricity to this customer in Q4 of 2027. 

And in October, VST reported that it had completed the acquisition of seven modern natural gas generation facilities totaling approximately 2,600 MW of capacity. 

VST stock changes hands at a trailing price-earnings ratio of 40 times and a forward P/E ratio of 21 times.

www.barchart.com

Potential Strong, Positive Catalysts for Nuclear-Power Producers

In addition to the powerful demand for carbon-free electricity from data centers, nuclear-power producers are well-positioned to benefit from Washington Republicans' affinity for the sector. The Republicans' budget bill passed earlier this year expanded an energy community tax bonus of 10% to some nuclear facilities, according to the IRS. The legislation also retained a tax credit of 0.3 cents-1.8 cents per kilowatt hour for “existing nuclear power facilities,” although the credit is now due to expire at the end of 2031 instead of the end of the following year, as was the case previously. 

What's more, Energy Secretary Chris Wright recently said that most of the funds that his department has available to lend to energy producers will be provided to the builders of nuclear plants.

And of course, the revenue and profits of Vistra's natural gas plants can also be boosted by strong demand from data centers. 

Signs (Besides Thiel's Move) That VST Stock May Be Overvalued

Despite increased demand for electricity from data centers, VST's trailing P/E ratio of 40 is rather elevated for an electrical utility. Its forward P/E ratio of 21 is much more reasonable. But on Sept. 22, investment bank Jeffries downgraded VST stock to “Hold” from “Buy,” partially due to what the bank saw as “the strength in [independent power producers],” delays and growing political risks in Texas, and “growing political risks” involving PJM, America's largest grid operator. The factors cited by Jeffries may cause Vistra's 2026 earnings per share to fall below analysts' average estimate. Since the company's forward P/E ratio is based on analysts' mean 2026 EPS estimate, its real forward P/E ratio may be significantly higher than 21 times. 

Further, Deepwater Asset Management's Doug Clinton told CNBC last month that he used to own VST stock but no longer does. According to Clinton, a great deal of the higher demand outlook for electricity seems to be priced into the shares. 

Finally, and perhaps most ominously of all, VST CEO James Burke on Nov. 11 sold over $4 million of VST stock. 


On the date of publication, Larry Ramer did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. For more information please view the Barchart Disclosure Policy here.

 

More news from Barchart

Recent Quotes

View More
Symbol Price Change (%)
AMZN  221.29
+4.15 (1.91%)
AAPL  272.15
+5.90 (2.22%)
AMD  206.05
+0.03 (0.01%)
BAC  51.55
+0.55 (1.08%)
GOOG  301.60
+11.62 (4.01%)
META  595.97
+6.82 (1.16%)
MSFT  474.71
-3.72 (-0.78%)
NVDA  181.04
+0.40 (0.22%)
ORCL  198.71
-11.98 (-5.68%)
TSLA  397.74
+2.50 (0.63%)
Stock Quote API & Stock News API supplied by www.cloudquote.io
Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes.
By accessing this page, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms Of Service.


 

IntelligentValue Home
Close Window

DISCLAIMER

All content herein is issued solely for informational purposes and is not to be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor should it be interpreted as a recommendation to buy, hold or sell (short or otherwise) any security.  All opinions, analyses, and information included herein are based on sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty of any kind, expressed or implied, is made including but not limited to any representation or warranty concerning accuracy, completeness, correctness, timeliness or appropriateness. We undertake no obligation to update such opinions, analysis or information. You should independently verify all information contained on this website. Some information is based on analysis of past performance or hypothetical performance results, which have inherent limitations. We make no representation that any particular equity or strategy will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. Shareholders, employees, writers, contractors, and affiliates associated with ETFOptimize.com may have ownership positions in the securities that are mentioned. If you are not sure if ETFs, algorithmic investing, or a particular investment is right for you, you are urged to consult with a Registered Investment Advisor (RIA). Neither this website nor anyone associated with producing its content are Registered Investment Advisors, and no attempt is made herein to substitute for personalized, professional investment advice. Neither ETFOptimize.com, Global Alpha Investments, Inc., nor its employees, service providers, associates, or affiliates are responsible for any investment losses you may incur as a result of using the information provided herein. Remember that past investment returns may not be indicative of future returns.

Copyright © 1998-2017 ETFOptimize.com, a publication of Optimized Investments, Inc. All rights reserved.