ETFOptimize | High-performance ETF-based Investment Strategies

Quantitative strategies, Wall Street-caliber research, and insightful market analysis since 1998.


ETFOptimize | HOME
Close Window

3 Ways to Play Celsius Holdings’ 2 Unusually Active Call Options

Wednesday’s options trading included 1,222 unusually active options. Topping yesterday’s list was Aloca's (AA)  Dec. 12 $40 put with a Vol/OI (volume-to-open-interest) ratio of 93.69. It was one of 13 options with Vol/OI ratios over 25. 

Among the 13 were two calls for energy drink maker, Celsius Holdings (CELH). CELH stock is down 29% in the past month since announcing its Q3 2025 financial results. Despite the steep drop over the past month, Celsius’ stock has done well in 2025, up 59% year-to-date. 

 

There appears to be a tug-of-war between bearish and bullish CELH investors right now. Is it a $25, $45, or $65 stock? That’s the million-dollar question.

Whether you’re bearish or bullish, yesterday’s two unusually active call options provide an opportunity. 

Here are three ways to play them.

The Options in Question

As I said in the introduction, there were two unusually active call options yesterday with Vol/OI ratios over 25. 

Interestingly, both calls had widespread interest from both small and large investors. 

The $41.50 call had trade sizes ranging from 290 (4 of these) to many single-contract transactions. Meanwhile, the $40 call was slightly more focused, with trade sizes ranging from 207 to single-contract transactions, though fewer in total.

Here are three strategies to play these two call options: Bull Call Spread, Bear Call Spread, and Ratio Call Spread. 

Bull Call Spread

A bull call spread is when you are moderately bullish about Celsius’ share price rising. Based on yesterday’s closing share price of $42, both calls are ITM (in the money). 

This strategy involves buying a call option with a lower strike price and selling a call option with a higher strike price. Both should have the same expiration date.

Unfortunately, these two don’t, so we’ll have to decouple them for this particular play. It’s important to note that a bull call spread uses the premium income from the short call you sell to reduce the cost of the long call you’d buy on its own. 

Intuitively, I’d be inclined to go for the bull call spread that has a lower net debit with a reasonably high potential profit.     

So, in this case, you have two strike prices with the same net debit or maximum loss of $1.74: $46 and $47. The maximum profit for the latter is nearly 60 percentage points higher, yet the risk/reward ratio is lower. That’s an easy call. Of the remaining two, I’d lean toward the $48 strike because the profit potential is nearly double for an additional $32. 

If I could only pick one between the $47 and $48 strike, I’d have to go with the latter. The net debit of $170 is $4 less, has a lower risk/reward ratio, and a higher maximum profit, with only a slightly lower profit probability. 

Bear Call Spread 

The bear call spread is the opposite of the bull spread. Here you are moderately bearish about Celsius’ future share price. 

This strategy involves selling a call option with a lower strike price and buying a call option with a higher strike price. Both should have the same expiration date. Like the bull call spread, the bear call spread has both limited profit and loss potential. Further, whereas the bull call spread involved a net debit, the bear call spread generates a net credit. 

I used the $41.50 call in the previous example; I’ll use the $40 call expiring on Dec. 26 for this one. Here are two examples: one where the $40 call is short and one where it’s long. 

I’ve selected the two long strike prices with the lowest risk/reward ratios. Given the maximum profit percentage, risk/reward ratios, and profit probabilities are pretty close, it becomes a function of comfort and risk tolerance. 

The $42 long call strike has a much lower net credit or maximum profit -- $93 compared to $208 for the $45 long call strike -- but its maximum loss of $107 [$42 long call strike - $40 short call strike - $0.93 net credit] is much more palatable than $292 for the higher-priced long call strike. 

If it were me, I’d go with the lower maximum profit, but everyone’s different. 

In this example, the $40 call is long, not short. The $35 short call provides $540 in premium income to offset the $340 cost of the $40 long call, for a net credit (maximum profit) of $200, while the maximum loss is $300 [$40 long call strike - $35 short call strike - $3.00 net credit].

The risk/reward ratio of the $40 long call isn’t much different than the $45 long call from above. However, the loss probability is almost double, making it a much tougher bet. I’d stick with the $40 call short. 

Ratio Call Spread

The final strategy is the ratio call spread, which involves buying different quantities of call options at different strike prices. The strategy capitalizes on price movement while receiving a net credit. As with the two previous strategies, the expiration dates for all calls used in the ratio call spread must be the same. 

So, like the two previous strategies, we’ll have to decouple the two unusually active call options to make this work. A common play involves buying one call and selling two calls with a higher strike price. It is a combination of a bull call spread and a naked call (you don’t own the stock).

For illustrative purposes, let’s assume that the $41.50 and $40 calls have the same Dec. 26 expiration date. As I write this on Thursday morning, I see that there is no $41.50 call strike available for the Dec. 26 expiration date, but there is a $41 strike and higher by $1 increments. 

To be successful in this trade, you want the share price at expiry to be lower than the higher strike price. 

So, first, the $40 call you’d buy has an ask price of $3.60, with volume of 34.  

Because you want to generate a net credit, you’ll need to sell two calls for bid prices of $1.65 or higher. That gives you two possibilities. 

Unfortunately, there’s no volume, but let’s assume these bid prices are real. The $41 strike has a $135 net credit [$2.30 bid price * 2 - $3.25 ask price]. The $42 strike has a $47 net credit [$1.86 bid price * 2 - $3.25 ask price].

If the share price is $42 on Dec. 26, the two short calls expire worthless, while the long $40 call is $2 ITM (in the money). You achieve a maximum gain of $247 [$42 long call strike - $40 short call strike + $47 net credit].

However, if the share price at expiration is $44, for example, your gain is $47 [$44 share price - $40 strike price * 100 shares + $42 strike price - $44 share price * 200 shares + $47 net credit]. You break even if the share price is $44.47 at expiration [$44.47 share price - $40 strike price * 100 shares + $42 strike price - $44.47 share price * 200 shares + $47 net credit]. Above $44.47, you’re into unlimited losses. 

Fun stuff.   


On the date of publication, Will Ashworth did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. For more information please view the Barchart Disclosure Policy here.

 

More news from Barchart

Recent Quotes

View More
Symbol Price Change (%)
AMZN  226.76
+0.00 (0.00%)
AAPL  272.19
+0.00 (0.00%)
AMD  201.06
+0.00 (0.00%)
BAC  54.26
+0.00 (0.00%)
GOOG  303.75
+0.00 (0.00%)
META  664.45
+0.00 (0.00%)
MSFT  483.98
+0.00 (0.00%)
NVDA  174.14
+0.00 (0.00%)
ORCL  180.03
+0.00 (0.00%)
TSLA  483.37
+0.00 (0.00%)
Stock Quote API & Stock News API supplied by www.cloudquote.io
Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes.
By accessing this page, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms Of Service.


 

IntelligentValue Home
Close Window

DISCLAIMER

All content herein is issued solely for informational purposes and is not to be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor should it be interpreted as a recommendation to buy, hold or sell (short or otherwise) any security.  All opinions, analyses, and information included herein are based on sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty of any kind, expressed or implied, is made including but not limited to any representation or warranty concerning accuracy, completeness, correctness, timeliness or appropriateness. We undertake no obligation to update such opinions, analysis or information. You should independently verify all information contained on this website. Some information is based on analysis of past performance or hypothetical performance results, which have inherent limitations. We make no representation that any particular equity or strategy will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. Shareholders, employees, writers, contractors, and affiliates associated with ETFOptimize.com may have ownership positions in the securities that are mentioned. If you are not sure if ETFs, algorithmic investing, or a particular investment is right for you, you are urged to consult with a Registered Investment Advisor (RIA). Neither this website nor anyone associated with producing its content are Registered Investment Advisors, and no attempt is made herein to substitute for personalized, professional investment advice. Neither ETFOptimize.com, Global Alpha Investments, Inc., nor its employees, service providers, associates, or affiliates are responsible for any investment losses you may incur as a result of using the information provided herein. Remember that past investment returns may not be indicative of future returns.

Copyright © 1998-2017 ETFOptimize.com, a publication of Optimized Investments, Inc. All rights reserved.