ETFOptimize | High-performance ETF-based Investment Strategies

Quantitative strategies, Wall Street-caliber research, and insightful market analysis since 1998.


ETFOptimize | HOME
Close Window

The Saturday Spread: Using Inductive Reasoning to Identify Options Trading Opportunities

While it’s tempting to search for narrative insights that the market may have missed, chances are, whatever major drivers that can materially impact a publicly traded company’s valuation has probably already been priced in. As such, the more effective means of assessing the forward dynamics of a security may be to frame the market behaviors using the Markov property.

Under Markov, the future state of a system depends solely on the current state. Colloquially, this simply means that probabilities are influenced by context. For example, in professional football, a 20-yard field goal is practically considered a guaranteed three points. However, if you throw in the context of snow, crosswinds and playoff pressure, suddenly, the calculus changes quite dramatically.

 

Over the last several months, I have exclusively analyzed securities based on an inductive model underpinned by Markovian logic. Essentially, the idea is that a security never enters the frame under a strictly neutral state. Instead, it enters under a particular context and, based on this setup, certain outcomes are more likely to materialize than others.

If a stock was previously sold off heavily in prior sessions, this context will almost surely have a different impact moving forward than if the same stock had previously enjoyed an extended series of upswings. For lack of a better phrase, stocks have a “memory” of the immediate past — and that memory can then influence future behaviors.

Of course, the philosophical criticism of induction is that there’s no evidence that repeated trials of particular events are guaranteed to materialize the same way in the future. That’s especially the risk with the market, where exogenous factors can easily disrupt the most well-reasoned analysis.

Still, the operational point is that humans are creatures of habit. As such, the belief is that repeated trials may create behavioral gravity wells that we may potentially profit from.

Bull Spread Idea: Salesforce (CRM)

Salesforce (CRM) may be off to a rocky start this year but the red ink just might entice a contrarian position. Since the beginning of January, CRM stock is down nearly 14%. Over the past 52 weeks, the security slipped about 32%. Unsurprisingly, the Barchart Technical Opinion indicator rates shares as a 56% Sell, pointing to a weakening short-term outlook.

What’s interesting about CRM stock is the volatility skew. Right now, traders are prioritizing downside protection based on the activity of puts across both multiple expiration dates and strike prices. That’s not to say that they aren’t looking for upside. However, the way that the derivatives market is structured suggests an anticipation of a higher probability of downside.

Nevertheless, context may be everything. In the last 10 weeks, CRM stock printed six up weeks but with an overall downward slope. Under this rare 6-4-D sequence, CRM would be expected to range between $210 and $250 over the next 10 weeks, with probability density peaking around $235 (assuming a spot price of $228.05). Over the next five weeks, probability density would likely peak between $223 and $237.

For intrepid speculators, the 232.50/237.50 bull call spread expiring Feb. 20 could be intriguing, especially since the breakeven price lands at a reasonable $234.90. Should CRM stock rise through the $237.50 strike at expiration, the maximum payout would stand at over 108%.

Bear Spread Idea: Mosaic (MOS)

Mosaic (MOS) may have a 24% Weak Sell rating from the Barchart Technical Opinion indicator but it’s currently one of the strongest names in the market. On Friday, MOS stock gained over 2%, bringing its year-to-date tally to a remarkable 19.51%. Despite the strong technical performance, the fundamental picture is suspect, with the company reporting weaker-than-expected demand.

Volatility skew shows pensiveness, with implied volatility (IV) on calls rising higher than puts on strike prices below the current spot price. In addition, put IV tends to swing higher on strikes above spot. Overall, this posture suggests that traders are prioritizing downside insurance. Further, the perception is that the negative movements have a higher likelihood of materializing.

In this case, I believe this perception aligns with reality. Over the last 10 weeks, MOS stock had printed seven up weeks, leading to an overall upward slope. Under this 7-3-U sequence, the forward 10 weeks would be expected to range between $24 and $31 (assuming a spot price of $28.79, Friday’s close).

Over the next five weeks, forward outcomes would likely congregate between $26 and $29.50, with probability density peaking around $27. Given how the probabilities are stacking up, traders may find temporary success going with the 30/27.50 bear put spread expiring Feb. 20. Should MOS stock fall through the $27.50 strike, the maximum payout would be nearly 84%.


On the date of publication, Josh Enomoto did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. For more information please view the Barchart Disclosure Policy here.

 

More news from Barchart

Recent Quotes

View More
Symbol Price Change (%)
AMZN  239.30
+0.00 (0.00%)
AAPL  259.48
+0.00 (0.00%)
AMD  236.73
+0.00 (0.00%)
BAC  53.20
+0.00 (0.00%)
GOOG  338.53
+0.00 (0.00%)
META  716.50
+0.00 (0.00%)
MSFT  430.29
+0.00 (0.00%)
NVDA  191.13
+0.00 (0.00%)
ORCL  164.58
+0.00 (0.00%)
TSLA  430.41
+0.00 (0.00%)
Stock Quote API & Stock News API supplied by www.cloudquote.io
Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes.
By accessing this page, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms Of Service.


 

IntelligentValue Home
Close Window

DISCLAIMER

All content herein is issued solely for informational purposes and is not to be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor should it be interpreted as a recommendation to buy, hold or sell (short or otherwise) any security.  All opinions, analyses, and information included herein are based on sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty of any kind, expressed or implied, is made including but not limited to any representation or warranty concerning accuracy, completeness, correctness, timeliness or appropriateness. We undertake no obligation to update such opinions, analysis or information. You should independently verify all information contained on this website. Some information is based on analysis of past performance or hypothetical performance results, which have inherent limitations. We make no representation that any particular equity or strategy will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. Shareholders, employees, writers, contractors, and affiliates associated with ETFOptimize.com may have ownership positions in the securities that are mentioned. If you are not sure if ETFs, algorithmic investing, or a particular investment is right for you, you are urged to consult with a Registered Investment Advisor (RIA). Neither this website nor anyone associated with producing its content are Registered Investment Advisors, and no attempt is made herein to substitute for personalized, professional investment advice. Neither ETFOptimize.com, Global Alpha Investments, Inc., nor its employees, service providers, associates, or affiliates are responsible for any investment losses you may incur as a result of using the information provided herein. Remember that past investment returns may not be indicative of future returns.

Copyright © 1998-2017 ETFOptimize.com, a publication of Optimized Investments, Inc. All rights reserved.