ETFOptimize | High-performance ETF-based Investment Strategies

Quantitative strategies, Wall Street-caliber research, and insightful market analysis since 1998.


ETFOptimize | HOME
Close Window

After a Tumultuous Few Months in the Stock Market, Ftse Russell Will Rebalance Its Widely Followed U.S. Indexes.

In the United States, the composition of Russell’s indexes has a significant impact. Changes in the Russell 1000, which covers the 1,000 biggest businesses listed on U.S. stock exchanges, are likely to be most noticeable.

All of Facebook’s parent companies, Meta Platforms (META), Netflix NFLX +5.03% (NFLX), Pinterest PINS, Zoom Video Communications ZM, and PayPal Holdings PYPL +5.24 percent (PYPL), will see their weightings in both growth and values following Friday’s closing, according to The Wall Street Journal. The firms in question aren’t normally associated with “value,” yet their stock prices meet FTSE Russell’s standards.

Value, growth, and/or both subindices are considered by the index giant while making this determination. One should also look at the company’s medium-term revenue growth forecasts, sales per share growth over the last five years, and the price-to-book ratio of stock while doing this analysis. A stock may be included in just one subindex, or it may be divided 90/10 between the two, depending on its relative ranking on those criteria. The company’s market capitalization determines how much weight it has in the Russell 1000 index.

The growth and value components of all of FTSE Russell’s other indexes, including Russell 2000 and Russell Microcap, are treated the same.

Once the index reorganization is complete, fund managers benchmarked against the Russell 1000 Value RLV +2.67 percent index will have additional choices to consider.

It’s shocking to see how much some of those once-steadfast growth engines have dropped off in the last year. Netflix has plummeted 63%, Zoom is down 68%, Pinterest is down 72%, and PayPal is down 74% since the beginning of the year. Because of these losses, the price-to-book ratios of these companies have fallen, increasing their value weight.

In addition, some of these businesses have recently experienced setbacks, like Netflix’s loss in subscribers and Meta and Pinterest’s poor advertising growth forecast. As a result, analysts have lowered their sales growth forecasts. After the reorganization on Friday, they now weigh both indices because of their combination.

Over the past year, the overall Russell 1000 Growth index has dropped 18 percent, while the Russell 1000 Value index has dropped 9 percent.

Growth equities, despite their recent underperformance, remain expensive compared to value companies, although not quite as expensive as they were at the pinnacle of the Covid-19 bull market. The price-to-earnings ratio of the Russell 1000 Growth index is presently 7.8 points greater than that of the Russell 1000 Value index. Last year, it had a premium of almost 15 points.

According to Jonathan Golub of Credit Suisse, the long-term average premium for growth’s P/E multiple above values is just 4.8 points. The last time the two subindexes traded at parity was during the bear market during the 2008-2009 global financial crisis.

The post After a Tumultuous Few Months in the Stock Market, Ftse Russell Will Rebalance Its Widely Followed U.S. Indexes. appeared first on Best Stocks.

Data & News supplied by www.cloudquote.io
Stock quotes supplied by Barchart
Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes.
By accessing this page, you agree to the following
Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.


 

IntelligentValue Home
Close Window

DISCLAIMER

All content herein is issued solely for informational purposes and is not to be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor should it be interpreted as a recommendation to buy, hold or sell (short or otherwise) any security.  All opinions, analyses, and information included herein are based on sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty of any kind, expressed or implied, is made including but not limited to any representation or warranty concerning accuracy, completeness, correctness, timeliness or appropriateness. We undertake no obligation to update such opinions, analysis or information. You should independently verify all information contained on this website. Some information is based on analysis of past performance or hypothetical performance results, which have inherent limitations. We make no representation that any particular equity or strategy will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. Shareholders, employees, writers, contractors, and affiliates associated with ETFOptimize.com may have ownership positions in the securities that are mentioned. If you are not sure if ETFs, algorithmic investing, or a particular investment is right for you, you are urged to consult with a Registered Investment Advisor (RIA). Neither this website nor anyone associated with producing its content are Registered Investment Advisors, and no attempt is made herein to substitute for personalized, professional investment advice. Neither ETFOptimize.com, Global Alpha Investments, Inc., nor its employees, service providers, associates, or affiliates are responsible for any investment losses you may incur as a result of using the information provided herein. Remember that past investment returns may not be indicative of future returns.

Copyright © 1998-2017 ETFOptimize.com, a publication of Optimized Investments, Inc. All rights reserved.