ETFOptimize | High-performance ETF-based Investment Strategies

Quantitative strategies, Wall Street-caliber research, and insightful market analysis since 1998.


ETFOptimize | HOME
Close Window

Cohesity Research Highlights a Gap That Puts Businesses and Security Postures at Risk — a Lack of Collaboration Between IT and Security Operations Teams

Nearly Half of Respondents in the Global Survey State Their Organization Has Been Hit by Ransomware in the Last Six Months

New research commissioned by Cohesity, a leader in next-gen data management, reveals that while most IT and security operations (SecOps) decision-makers believe they should jointly share the responsibility for their organization’s data security strategy, many of these teams are not collaborating as effectively as possible to address growing cyber threats. The survey also shows that of those respondents who believe collaboration is weak between IT and security, nearly half of respondents believe their organization is more exposed to cyber threats as a result — and the implications of that could have significant consequences for businesses.

The research is based on an April 2022 survey conducted by Censuswide, of more than 2,000 IT decision-makers and SecOps professionals (split nearly 50/50 between the two groups) from businesses in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia — all of whom have a role in the decision-making process for IT or security.

The survey was conducted as nearly three-quarters (74%) of respondents believe the threat of ransomware in their industry has increased over the last year, with nearly half of respondents (47%) saying their organization has been the victim of a ransomware attack in the last six months. The survey uncovered the following results globally:

  • Security should be a shared responsibility: More than four in five (81%) of respondents overall (86% of IT decision-makers and 76% of SecOps) somewhat or strongly agree that IT and SecOps should share the responsibility for their organization’s data security strategy.
  • But, effective collaboration between IT and security teams is frequently not happening: Almost a third of SecOps respondents (31%) believe the collaboration is not strong with IT, with 9% of those respondents going so far as to call it “weak.” Among IT decision-makers, more than a tenth of respondents (13%), believe collaboration with SecOps is not strong. In total, nearly a quarter (22%) of IT and SecOps respondents overall believe the collaboration between the two groups is not strong.[1]
  • In many cases, even though the threat of cyberattacks has increased, the level of collaboration between IT and SecOps has remained stagnant or has declined: 40% of respondents, overall, said collaboration between the two groups has remained the same even in light of increased cyberattacks. And, 12% of all respondents said collaboration has actually decreased. While only 5% of IT decision makers said collaboration has decreased, nearly one in five (18%) of SecOps respondents believe that is the case, highlighting disparity between the two functions.
  • The ongoing tech talent shortage is making matters worse: When asked if the talent shortage is impacting the collaboration between IT and security teams, 78% of respondents (77% of IT decision-makers and 78% of SecOps) said, yes, it is having an impact.
  • As a result of this lack of collaboration between IT and SecOps, many respondents believe their organization is more exposed: Among the IT and SecOps respondents who believe the collaboration is weak between the two groups, 42% believe their organization is either more exposed (28%), or much more exposed (14%) to cyber threats.
  • The consequences of that exposure could be devastating for businesses and for careers: When asked what would be their worst fear about a lack of collaboration between security and IT if an attack takes place, 42% of all respondents are concerned about a loss of data, 42% fear business disruption, 40% are worried customers will take their business elsewhere, 35% fear finger-pointing will take place and their team will be blamed should any mistakes occur, 32% are worried about paying ransomware, and 30% fear people from both teams (IT and SecOps) will be fired.

“This research pinpoints there is often a lack of collaboration between IT and security teams that we’re seeing across many organizations today,” said Brian Spanswick, chief information security officer, Cohesity. “For too long, many security teams focused primarily on preventing cyberattacks, while IT teams have focused on data protection, including backup and recovery. A complete data security strategy must bring these two worlds together — but in many cases, they remain separate and this lack of collaboration creates significant business risks and can put companies at the mercy of bad actors.”

To further drive this point home, when respondents were asked how their company prioritized data backup and protection as part of their organization's security posture or response to a cyberattack, 54% of IT decision-makers said it was a top priority and a crucial capability, while only 38% of SecOps respondents said the same.

“If SecOps teams are not thinking about backup and recovery, and lack next-gen data management capabilities as part of an overall security strategy, that’s a problem,” said Spanswick. “IT and SecOps teams need to collaborate before an attack takes place — looking holistically across the NIST Cyber Security Framework which includes five core capabilities: identify, protect, detect, respond, and recover. If they wait to collaborate until their data is hijacked, that’s too late and the results could be catastrophic for businesses.”

Eighty-three percent of all respondents (84% of IT decision-makers and 81% of SecOps respondents) somewhat or strongly agree that if security and IT collaborated more closely, their organization would be better prepared to recover from cyber threats including ransomware attacks. And, when respondents were asked what would give their organization greater confidence that they could recover business systems quickly in the event of a ransomware attack, 44% of all respondents (49% of IT decision-makers and 39% of SecOps respondents) said greater communication and collaboration between IT and security is key.

For more information:

  • To learn more about next-gen data management, click here.
  • To learn more about Cohesity Threat Defense, please click here.
  • To learn more about data governance and compliance, please click here.

[1] ‘Not strong’ refers to the proportion of respondents that did not select ‘strong’ or ‘very strong’ when asked: How strong or weak do you feel your organization's security and IT teams collaborate to address growing cyber security threats, including ransomware attacks?

About Cohesity

Cohesity radically simplifies data management. We make it easy to protect, manage, and derive value from data — across the data center, edge, and cloud. We offer a full suite of services consolidated on one multicloud data platform: backup and recovery, disaster recovery, file and object services, dev/test, and data compliance, security, and analytics — reducing complexity and eliminating mass data fragmentation. Cohesity can be delivered as a service, self-managed, or provided by a Cohesity-powered partner.

© 2022 Cohesity, Inc. All rights reserved. Cohesity, the Cohesity logo, Helios, and other Cohesity marks are trademarks or registered trademarks of Cohesity, Inc. in the U.S. and/or internationally. Other company and product names may be trademarks of the respective companies with which they are associated.

Contacts

Stock Quote API & Stock News API supplied by www.cloudquote.io
Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes.
By accessing this page, you agree to the following
Privacy Policy and Terms Of Service.


 

IntelligentValue Home
Close Window

DISCLAIMER

All content herein is issued solely for informational purposes and is not to be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor should it be interpreted as a recommendation to buy, hold or sell (short or otherwise) any security.  All opinions, analyses, and information included herein are based on sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty of any kind, expressed or implied, is made including but not limited to any representation or warranty concerning accuracy, completeness, correctness, timeliness or appropriateness. We undertake no obligation to update such opinions, analysis or information. You should independently verify all information contained on this website. Some information is based on analysis of past performance or hypothetical performance results, which have inherent limitations. We make no representation that any particular equity or strategy will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. Shareholders, employees, writers, contractors, and affiliates associated with ETFOptimize.com may have ownership positions in the securities that are mentioned. If you are not sure if ETFs, algorithmic investing, or a particular investment is right for you, you are urged to consult with a Registered Investment Advisor (RIA). Neither this website nor anyone associated with producing its content are Registered Investment Advisors, and no attempt is made herein to substitute for personalized, professional investment advice. Neither ETFOptimize.com, Global Alpha Investments, Inc., nor its employees, service providers, associates, or affiliates are responsible for any investment losses you may incur as a result of using the information provided herein. Remember that past investment returns may not be indicative of future returns.

Copyright © 1998-2017 ETFOptimize.com, a publication of Optimized Investments, Inc. All rights reserved.