ETFOptimize | High-performance ETF-based Investment Strategies

Quantitative strategies, Wall Street-caliber research, and insightful market analysis since 1998.


ETFOptimize | HOME
Close Window

Class Action Lawsuit Filed by Seattle Business Against Google Alleging Breach of Contract, Unjust Enrichment, and Violations of California Law

Lawsuit claims that Google failed to honor its “Free-For-Life” Promise and other contractual and legal commitments to customers who signed up for Workspace (formerly G Suite or Google Apps) from 2006 to 2012

Consumer law firms Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP and Webb, Klase & Lemond, LLC have filed a class action lawsuit against Google, LLC based on its treatment of customers who signed up for Workspace (formerly G Suite or Google Apps) during the several years when Google promised that the service would be “free-for-life.” The suit has been filed in federal district court in San Jose, California. The Class Action Complaint alleges that, in order to entice early adopter customers to sign up for the service that is now known as Google Workspace, Google promised them free service for as long as Google offered the service. Google entered into this bargain, according to the Complaint, so it could benefit from these customers’ experiences and use of the service to develop and fine-tune the service, with the goal of putting Google in a position to eventually market the service to other customers for a fee.

According to the Complaint, beginning in January of 2012, all new customers signing up for Workspace were required to pay for the service. Paid customers pay a monthly fee per user, such as $12 per employee/user, for a basic version of Workspace. The Complaint alleges, however, that until recently, Google had never mentioned breaking the “free-for-life” promise made to the early adopters of Workspace. The suit contends that, in January 2022, Google announced to its “free-for-life” customers that it was going to completely stop providing their free service, even though Google continued to offer the same Workspace suite of products. Plaintiff alleges that, by making this announcement, Google forced its “free-for-life” customers to choose between paying for Workspace or losing the service entirely, in which case they would have to find a new service, migrate their information to that new service, and potentially risk losing important data and content that they were storing on Google’s systems.

The suit also recounts how Google officially renounced its ethos of “Don’t Be Evil” prior to announcing the end of the “free-for-life” promise. The Complaint alleges the company has grown massively from the time it made the “free-for-life” promise to now making billions of dollars in profits each month.

The Class Action Complaint asserts that, due to backlash from customers in response to Google’s announcement that it was breaching its “free-for-life” promise, Google eventually allowed some “free-for-life” customers with “non-commercial” accounts to “opt-out” of the breach. The suit alleges, however, that the Plaintiff and other small business owners who have commercial accounts are now forced to pay for their once-free Workspace services, even though, the suit contends, Google never distinguished between commercial and non-commercial use when it made the free-for-life promise and Google knew that many of the early adopters would use the service for their business. Indeed, the Complaint explains that Google explicitly marketed the free service to businesses. The suit also alleges that “non-commercial” users who provided their payment information shortly after Google’s January 2022 announcement that it was breaking the free-for-life promise, and other “non-commercial” users, are likewise being forced to pay for their once-free Workspace service in violation of what Google promised.

The suit also includes illustrative complaints from legacy Google Apps or G Suite users. Such complaints show that Google’s improper action affected many of Google’s most loyal customers.

The legal claims referenced in the Class Action Complaint are for breach of contract, unjust enrichment, and violations of California’s Unfair Competition Law. The suit seeks restitution, specific performance, and injunctive relief.

The case, styled The Stratford Company, LLC v. Google, LLC, is pending in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California and has been assigned case number 5:22-cv-04547-NC.

If you wish to discuss this class action or have any questions concerning this press release, please contact Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP at (415) 956-1000 or workspaceclassaction@lchb.com. You may also visit the firm website at www.lieffcabraser.com/workspace. In the alternative, you may contact Webb, Klase & Lemond at (770) 444-9325 or Contact@WebbLLC.com or visit the website at www.WebbLLC.com.

Lawsuit claims that Google failed to honor its “Free-For-Life” Promise and other contractual and legal commitments to customers who signed up for Workspace (formerly G Suite or Google Apps) from 2006 to 2012

Contacts

Roger Heller

Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP

rheller@lchb.com

415 956-1000

lieffcabraser.com

Stock Quote API & Stock News API supplied by www.cloudquote.io
Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes.
By accessing this page, you agree to the following
Privacy Policy and Terms Of Service.


 

IntelligentValue Home
Close Window

DISCLAIMER

All content herein is issued solely for informational purposes and is not to be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor should it be interpreted as a recommendation to buy, hold or sell (short or otherwise) any security.  All opinions, analyses, and information included herein are based on sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty of any kind, expressed or implied, is made including but not limited to any representation or warranty concerning accuracy, completeness, correctness, timeliness or appropriateness. We undertake no obligation to update such opinions, analysis or information. You should independently verify all information contained on this website. Some information is based on analysis of past performance or hypothetical performance results, which have inherent limitations. We make no representation that any particular equity or strategy will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. Shareholders, employees, writers, contractors, and affiliates associated with ETFOptimize.com may have ownership positions in the securities that are mentioned. If you are not sure if ETFs, algorithmic investing, or a particular investment is right for you, you are urged to consult with a Registered Investment Advisor (RIA). Neither this website nor anyone associated with producing its content are Registered Investment Advisors, and no attempt is made herein to substitute for personalized, professional investment advice. Neither ETFOptimize.com, Global Alpha Investments, Inc., nor its employees, service providers, associates, or affiliates are responsible for any investment losses you may incur as a result of using the information provided herein. Remember that past investment returns may not be indicative of future returns.

Copyright © 1998-2017 ETFOptimize.com, a publication of Optimized Investments, Inc. All rights reserved.