ETFOptimize | High-performance ETF-based Investment Strategies

Quantitative strategies, Wall Street-caliber research, and insightful market analysis since 1998.


ETFOptimize | HOME
Close Window

Fluke’s Fourth Annual Electrical Safety Survey Reveals Opportunities to Improve Safety Training

Study confirms the importance of a strong culture of safety as well as the responsibility of both individuals and organizations to implement it

According to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), 26 workers died from exposure to electricity in 2020 while 56 percent of workplace injuries were caused by direct exposure to electricity — injuries caused by direct contact with the power source, such as direct contact with a live electrical wire or when the victim is struck by an electrical arc.

This press release features multimedia. View the full release here: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20230622344671/en/

The survey found that sentiment about who is most responsible for safety has remained the same over the past four years — workers being ranked most responsible — yet there is a feeling among many of the respondents that organizations can be doing a better job in creating a safe work environment. Nearly 90 percent strongly agreed or agreed that organizations have an opportunity to improve electrical safety in the workplace. (Photo: Business Wire)

The survey found that sentiment about who is most responsible for safety has remained the same over the past four years — workers being ranked most responsible — yet there is a feeling among many of the respondents that organizations can be doing a better job in creating a safe work environment. Nearly 90 percent strongly agreed or agreed that organizations have an opportunity to improve electrical safety in the workplace. (Photo: Business Wire)

Workplace safety is something everyone agrees is important, yet the majority of workers see an opportunity to improve electrical safety. Fluke Corporation’s fourth annual Electrical Safety Survey confirms the importance of a strong culture of safety and identifies trends on a variety of workplace safety-related topics.

Said one survey respondent: “The culture of safety needs to start from the very top and be applied in every layer of the ‘command structure.’ Fine words and spreadsheets do nothing if the actions in the field are not monitored and safety is not culturally enforced in any way.”

The survey found that sentiment about who is most responsible for safety has remained the same over the past four years — workers being ranked most responsible — yet there is a feeling among many of the respondents that organizations can be doing a better job in creating a safe work environment. Nearly 90 percent strongly agreed or agreed that organizations have an opportunity to improve electrical safety in the workplace.

As one respondent from Australia put it, “Safety requirements and compliance are a lot better than they used to be, but it is still something we need to focus on to ensure improvements continue and younger tradesman embrace it.”

A higher percentage of respondents (56 percent) said they had ideas on how to make the industry a safer place to work and 41 percent provided specific ideas and feedback in the survey.

And as has been seen in previous years, the majority of respondents — 79 percent — felt they were personally most responsible for workplace safety. “Safety begins with me. I am responsible to make sure that what I am doing is safe. Having the correct tools, clothing, and area to work is up to me to use them,” said a respondent from Florida.

A worker from California adds, “I feel everyone in the chain bears responsibility for workplace safety. The essential component in my opinion is communication and implementation. Management needs to be made aware of issues and should be required to act responsibly to address these issues as they arise.”

Yet the survey also found that, year over year, the strong majority of respondents agree that electricians skip using the correct personal protective equipment (PPE) because it is inconvenient. An engineer from Idaho offers “the equipment and/or tools cannot be significantly cumbersome or they will not use it either. From my experience gloves are the most unused PPE because they hinder work.” And a worker from Florida points out that pressure to work quickly may also be why some safety steps, like PPE, are skipped: “We have to stop putting pressure on down time to allow for proper safety to happen.”

To read the complete results of the fourth Fluke Electrical Safety Survey, visit: https://www.fluke.com/en-us/learn/blog/safety/electrical-safety-stats.

Fluke Corporation

For information on Fluke tools and applications, or to find the location of a distributor, contact Fluke Corporation, P.O. Box 9090, Everett, WA USA 98206, call (800) 44-FLUKE (800-443-5853), fax (425) 446-5116, e-mail fluke-info@fluke.com or visit the Fluke Web site at www.fluke.com.

About Fluke

Founded in 1948, Fluke Corporation is the world leader in compact, professional electronic test tools and software for measuring and condition monitoring. Fluke customers are technicians, engineers, electricians, maintenance managers, and metrologists who install, troubleshoot, and maintain industrial, electrical, and electronic equipment and calibration processes.

FLUKE is a registered trademark of Fluke Corporation. For more information, visit the Fluke website.

Contacts

Data & News supplied by www.cloudquote.io
Stock quotes supplied by Barchart
Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes.
By accessing this page, you agree to the following
Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.


 

IntelligentValue Home
Close Window

DISCLAIMER

All content herein is issued solely for informational purposes and is not to be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor should it be interpreted as a recommendation to buy, hold or sell (short or otherwise) any security.  All opinions, analyses, and information included herein are based on sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty of any kind, expressed or implied, is made including but not limited to any representation or warranty concerning accuracy, completeness, correctness, timeliness or appropriateness. We undertake no obligation to update such opinions, analysis or information. You should independently verify all information contained on this website. Some information is based on analysis of past performance or hypothetical performance results, which have inherent limitations. We make no representation that any particular equity or strategy will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. Shareholders, employees, writers, contractors, and affiliates associated with ETFOptimize.com may have ownership positions in the securities that are mentioned. If you are not sure if ETFs, algorithmic investing, or a particular investment is right for you, you are urged to consult with a Registered Investment Advisor (RIA). Neither this website nor anyone associated with producing its content are Registered Investment Advisors, and no attempt is made herein to substitute for personalized, professional investment advice. Neither ETFOptimize.com, Global Alpha Investments, Inc., nor its employees, service providers, associates, or affiliates are responsible for any investment losses you may incur as a result of using the information provided herein. Remember that past investment returns may not be indicative of future returns.

Copyright © 1998-2017 ETFOptimize.com, a publication of Optimized Investments, Inc. All rights reserved.