ETFOptimize | High-performance ETF-based Investment Strategies

Quantitative strategies, Wall Street-caliber research, and insightful market analysis since 1998.


ETFOptimize | HOME
Close Window

Excitement of Traditional Auto Manufacturers’ BEV Owners at All-Time High, J.D. Power Finds

Porsche Highest-Ranking Premium Brand; MINI Highest-Ranking Mass Market Brand

Owner satisfaction with new-vehicle design and performance has rebounded after two years of unprecedented decline, according to the J.D. Power 2024 U.S. Automotive Performance, Execution and Layout (APEAL) Study,SM released today. Overall satisfaction is 847 (on a 1,000-point scale), an increase of 2 points from a year ago. Satisfaction with non-Tesla battery electric vehicles (BEVs) is at an all-time high (877), surpassing stalwart Tesla (870).

“Traditional manufacturers have listened to the Voice of the Customer,” said Frank Hanley, senior director of auto benchmarking at J.D. Power. “They’re launching enhanced vehicles that are more in line with what customers want, including improved interior storage and higher quality materials, as well as ensuring features have ease of use. For BEVs, recent launches from traditional manufacturers have surpassed perennial leader Tesla when it comes to owners’ level of emotional attachment and excitement with their new vehicle.”

However, one area that continues to put a damper on excitement across all vehicle fuel types is infotainment—one of the 10 factors on which the study is based. Despite satisfaction improving 5 points this year to 823, infotainment remains one of the lowest-scoring categories industry wide. While satisfaction with in-vehicle infotainment systems averages 805, it is higher among owners who use Android Auto (832) or Apple CarPlay (840). This shows that customers prefer to have the simplistic usability of their phone extended into their vehicle more so than what manufacturers are providing.

Now in its 29th year, the APEAL Study complements the J.D. Power U.S. Initial Quality StudySM (IQS) and the J.D. Power U.S. Tech Experience Index (TXI) StudySM by measuring owners' emotional attachment and level of excitement with their new vehicle. The APEAL Study asks owners to consider 37 attributes, ranging from the sense of comfort they feel when climbing into the driver's seat to their exhilaration when they step on the accelerator. Vehicle owners' responses to queries about these attributes are aggregated to compute an overall APEAL Index score.

Following are key findings of the 2024 study:

  • BEVs from traditional manufacturers highly appealing: Across all fuel types, emotional satisfaction is highest among owners of non-Tesla BEVs (877), surpassing Tesla (870), owners of gasoline (842) and plug-in hybrid (841) vehicles. Tesla remains strong for satisfaction among its loyal buyers but is lackluster with conquest buyers. Newer BEVs are achieving higher APEAL scores due to improved battery range and better interior materials.
  • Premium brands still stir more emotions than mass market brands: While satisfaction is higher for premium brands than for mass market brands (870 vs. 838, respectively), only mass market brands show year-over-year improvement, on average, rising a single point. The gap was smallest in 2021 when emotional satisfaction among owners of mass market vehicles was only 19 points behind that of premium vehicle owners.
  • Infotainment systems are getting more complicated: Gone are the days of only listening to AM or FM radio—owners now switch between a variety of audio sources including satellite radio and Apple CarPlay. However, 25% of owners say switching between sources contributes to a poor audio experience and 23% say difficult menu structure is to blame. “Automakers keep pouring additional features into their vehicle infotainment systems, but it appears to be creating needless complexity,” Hanley said. “Owners struggle to perform simple audio-related tasks, so it begs the question whether automakers are actually in tune with the desires and needs of their customers.”
  • High APEAL drives long-term value: Vehicles with a higher APEAL performance retain their value at a greater rate than do those with lower APEAL performance. The Net Promotor Score®1 is 38 points higher when APEAL is above average, meaning owners are more likely to promote their vehicle and recommend it to friends and family, further illustrating the long-term effect that a highly appealing vehicle has on the marketplace.

Highest-Ranking Brands

Porsche ranks highest among premium brands with a score of 891. Jaguar (886) ranks second and Land Rover (882) ranks third.

MINI ranks highest among mass market brands with a score of 858. Ram (854) ranks second and Kia (853) ranks third.

Model-Level APEAL Awards

The parent company receiving the most model-level awards (for models ranking highest in their respective segment) is Hyundai Motor Group (seven segment awards), followed by BMW AG (four segment awards and highest-ranking model) and Toyota Motor Corporation (three segment awards).

The complete list of award recipients is:

Hyundai Motor Group: Genesis GV60, Hyundai Santa Fe, Kia Carnival, Kia EV6, Kia EV9, Kia Forte and Kia K5

BMW AG: BMW 2 Series, BMW 7 Series, BMW iX, BMW X4 and MINI Countryman

Toyota Motor Corporation: Lexus LC, Lexus RX and Toyota Tacoma

Stellantis NV: Alfa Romeo Giulia and Jeep Wagoneer

Nissan Motor Co., Ltd: Nissan Titan

Volkswagen AG: Porsche Taycan

Jaguar Land Rover Limited: Land Rover Range Rover

Ford Motor Company: Ford Super Duty

BMW 7 Series is the highest-ranking individual model. Kia K5 receives a model-level award for a fourth consecutive year, while Kia EV6 and Kia Carnival each receive model-level awards for a third consecutive year. BMW iX, BMW X4, Genesis GV60, Kia Forte, MINI Countryman, Nissan Titan, Lexus RX and Land Rover Range Rover each receive model-level awards for a second consecutive year.

See the rank charts and list of model-level award winners at http://www.jdpower.com/pr-id/2024072.

The 2024 U.S. APEAL Study is based on responses from 99,144 owners of new 2024 model-year vehicles who were surveyed after 90 days of ownership. The study was fielded from July 2023 through May 2024 based on vehicles registered from April 2023 through February 2024.

For more information about the U.S. APEAL Study, visit https://www.jdpower.com/business/us-automotive-performance-execution-and-layout-apeal-study

About J.D. Power

J.D. Power is a global leader in automotive data and analytics, and provides industry intelligence, consumer insights and advisory solutions to the automotive industry and selected non-automotive industries. J.D. Power leverages its extensive proprietary datasets and software capabilities combined with advanced analytics and artificial intelligence tools to help its clients optimize business performance.

J.D. Power was founded in 1968 and has offices in North America, Europe and Asia Pacific. To learn more about the company's business offerings, visit JDPower.com/business. The J.D. Power auto-shopping tool can be found at JDPower.com.

About J.D. Power and Advertising/Promotional Rules: http://www.jdpower.com/business/about-us/press-release-info

1 Net Promoter System®, Net Promoter Score®, NPS®, and the NPS-related emoticons are registered trademarks of Bain & Company, Inc., Fred Reichheld and Satmetrix Systems, Inc.

Contacts

Stock Quote API & Stock News API supplied by www.cloudquote.io
Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes.
By accessing this page, you agree to the following
Privacy Policy and Terms Of Service.


 

IntelligentValue Home
Close Window

DISCLAIMER

All content herein is issued solely for informational purposes and is not to be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor should it be interpreted as a recommendation to buy, hold or sell (short or otherwise) any security.  All opinions, analyses, and information included herein are based on sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty of any kind, expressed or implied, is made including but not limited to any representation or warranty concerning accuracy, completeness, correctness, timeliness or appropriateness. We undertake no obligation to update such opinions, analysis or information. You should independently verify all information contained on this website. Some information is based on analysis of past performance or hypothetical performance results, which have inherent limitations. We make no representation that any particular equity or strategy will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. Shareholders, employees, writers, contractors, and affiliates associated with ETFOptimize.com may have ownership positions in the securities that are mentioned. If you are not sure if ETFs, algorithmic investing, or a particular investment is right for you, you are urged to consult with a Registered Investment Advisor (RIA). Neither this website nor anyone associated with producing its content are Registered Investment Advisors, and no attempt is made herein to substitute for personalized, professional investment advice. Neither ETFOptimize.com, Global Alpha Investments, Inc., nor its employees, service providers, associates, or affiliates are responsible for any investment losses you may incur as a result of using the information provided herein. Remember that past investment returns may not be indicative of future returns.

Copyright © 1998-2017 ETFOptimize.com, a publication of Optimized Investments, Inc. All rights reserved.