ETFOptimize | High-performance ETF-based Investment Strategies

Quantitative strategies, Wall Street-caliber research, and insightful market analysis since 1998.


ETFOptimize | HOME
Close Window

New Poll Finds Massachusetts Voters Strongly Support Maintaining Competitive Electric Supply Market

More than four out of five current or former retail electricity supply customers rate their experience positively, significant majority want to maintain choice in the electric market, and protect against utility monopolies.

A new poll has been released showing significant opposition to legislation that would eliminate the competitive electric supply market, with voters expressing strong support for maintaining competition and preventing a utility monopoly in Massachusetts.

The poll, conducted by leading Massachusetts pollster Beacon Research, was released following passage of legislation in the Massachusetts Senate last month that would effectively eliminate retail electric choice for Massachusetts customers and force them onto monopoly utility service. The Senate action would also close the competitive supply industry, resulting in the loss of industry jobs in the state.

“Voters have been consistent on this issue,” said Chris Anderson, President of Beacon Research, Inc. “They clearly support maintaining competition in the electricity market, and those views only strengthen as they learn more about the issue. Voters want to ensure they maintain the ability to choose more affordable, innovative, or renewable options and prevent monopoly control by the utilities.”

Among the key findings of the poll include:

  • 62% of voters oppose eliminating the competitive supply market when they learn the big utilities would be the only option for buying electricity, while just 27% favor eliminating the market;
  • 71% think protecting consumers against utility monopolies should be an important priority for policymakers;
  • 82% of current and former customers give positive ratings for their experience with retail electricity suppliers;
  • 83% think it’s important for lawmakers to prioritize keeping costs as low as possible when it comes to their energy

Voters see several good reasons for keeping the competitive electric supply market in Massachusetts, including:

  • 89% - Maintaining competition for more consumer choices;
  • 86% - The cost savings opportunities of the competitive supply market;
  • 82% - The renewable energy options offered by competitive supply companies.

The poll of 756 Massachusetts registered voters was conducted between May 15- 22, 2024. The survey was sponsored by NRG, a Fortune 200 company with over six million retail energy customers across North America, including Massachusetts.

A full copy of the polling memo can be found here.

About NRG

NRG Energy is a leading energy and home services company powered by people and our passion for a smarter, cleaner, and more connected future. A Fortune 500 company operating in the United States and Canada, NRG delivers innovative solutions that help people, organizations, and businesses achieve their goals while also advocating for competitive energy markets and customer choice. More information is available at www.nrg.com. Connect with NRG on Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn and X.

Contacts

Recent Quotes

View More
Symbol Price Change (%)
AMZN  244.20
-4.90 (-1.97%)
AAPL  273.47
-1.78 (-0.65%)
AMD  258.89
+21.37 (9.00%)
BAC  54.11
+0.48 (0.90%)
GOOG  287.43
-4.31 (-1.48%)
META  609.01
-18.07 (-2.88%)
MSFT  511.14
+2.46 (0.48%)
NVDA  193.80
+0.64 (0.33%)
ORCL  226.99
-9.16 (-3.88%)
TSLA  430.60
-9.02 (-2.05%)
Stock Quote API & Stock News API supplied by www.cloudquote.io
Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes.
By accessing this page, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms Of Service.


 

IntelligentValue Home
Close Window

DISCLAIMER

All content herein is issued solely for informational purposes and is not to be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor should it be interpreted as a recommendation to buy, hold or sell (short or otherwise) any security.  All opinions, analyses, and information included herein are based on sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty of any kind, expressed or implied, is made including but not limited to any representation or warranty concerning accuracy, completeness, correctness, timeliness or appropriateness. We undertake no obligation to update such opinions, analysis or information. You should independently verify all information contained on this website. Some information is based on analysis of past performance or hypothetical performance results, which have inherent limitations. We make no representation that any particular equity or strategy will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. Shareholders, employees, writers, contractors, and affiliates associated with ETFOptimize.com may have ownership positions in the securities that are mentioned. If you are not sure if ETFs, algorithmic investing, or a particular investment is right for you, you are urged to consult with a Registered Investment Advisor (RIA). Neither this website nor anyone associated with producing its content are Registered Investment Advisors, and no attempt is made herein to substitute for personalized, professional investment advice. Neither ETFOptimize.com, Global Alpha Investments, Inc., nor its employees, service providers, associates, or affiliates are responsible for any investment losses you may incur as a result of using the information provided herein. Remember that past investment returns may not be indicative of future returns.

Copyright © 1998-2017 ETFOptimize.com, a publication of Optimized Investments, Inc. All rights reserved.