ETFOptimize | High-performance ETF-based Investment Strategies

Quantitative strategies, Wall Street-caliber research, and insightful market analysis since 1998.


ETFOptimize | HOME
Close Window

Tariffs Accelerate Buying Decisions While Transparency Drives Sales Satisfaction, J.D. Power Finds

Porsche Ranks Highest among Premium Brands for Third Consecutive Year; Buick Ranks Highest among Mass Market Brands

More than one-third (36%) of buyers in the new-vehicle market say tariffs impacted their vehicle purchase process, with most of them buying sooner than they had planned, according to the J.D. Power 2025 U.S. Sales Satisfaction Index (SSI) Study,SM released today. Despite the market shifts, overall customer satisfaction with the vehicle purchase experience increases by 1 point this year to 802 (on a 1,000-point scale).

“Satisfaction among buyers has been gradually improving over the years, including a modest increase in 2025 despite the added uncertainties that tariffs bring,” said Stewart Stropp, vice president of automotive retail at J.D. Power. “However, even in a challenging market, the fundamentals of satisfaction haven’t changed. Dealers who stay transparent during the deal, take time to educate buyers on their vehicle’s features, and maintain that connection after delivery are the ones poised to boost buyer satisfaction, ultimately leading to better customer retention and business growth.”

Following are some key findings of the 2025 study:

  • Nearly one-fourth of buyers want a follow-up on their vehicle’s features but it never comes: While most buyers want to learn about all of their vehicle’s features upon delivery, nearly one-fourth (22%) indicate they would like a follow-up explanation of vehicle features and controls from the dealership a few weeks later, either through a phone call, dealership visit or online video/tutorials. However, more than half (53%) of these buyers never receive any such follow-up, presenting a key opportunity for dealers to improve the vehicle delivery process and boost future service retention and loyalty.
  • Justifying trade-in values drives higher satisfaction: Trade-in transactions have been steadily increasing since the decline in lease volume that began several years ago. Among buyers who traded in a vehicle, 28% say their trade-in value was less than expected. However, when the dealer provides a clear explanation justifying the trade-in value, customer satisfaction is notably higher, even among those buyers who say the trade-in value didn’t meet their expectations. In such instances, overall satisfaction with the deal-making process averages a score of 800 when justification was provided but plummets to 672 when it wasn’t, highlighting the importance of transparency in the trade-in process.
  • Import brand buyers are more likely to say tariffs accelerated their purchase plans: Buyers of brands from Japan and Europe more likely advanced their vehicle purchase in response to tariffs. Overall, among customers who say tariffs impacted their purchase, 87% in both the premium and mass market segments say they bought their vehicle sooner than intended. Furthermore, nearly 15% of buyers in both segments say they spent more than originally intended for their new vehicle.

Highest-Ranking Brands

Porsche ranks highest in sales satisfaction among premium brands for a third consecutive year, with a score of 855. Land Rover (838) ranks second and Infiniti (835) ranks third.

Buick ranks highest in sales satisfaction among mass market brands with a score of 827. Subaru (823) ranks second and Chevrolet (821) ranks third.

Segment Awards

The following are the highest-ranked brands in each segment:

Premium Car: Porsche (for a third consecutive year)

Premium SUV: Porsche (for a third consecutive year)

Mass Market Car: Mazda

Mass Market SUV: Buick (for a second consecutive year)

Mass Market Truck: Chevrolet

See the rank chart for each segment at http://www.jdpower.com/pr-id/2025147.

Now in its 40th year, the U.S. Sales Satisfaction Index (SSI) Study measures customer satisfaction with the sales experience among new-vehicle buyers and rejecters. The study is a comprehensive analysis of the new-vehicle purchase experience and satisfaction with the selling dealer (satisfaction among buyers). The study also measures satisfaction with brands and dealerships that were shopped but ultimately rejected in favor of the selling dealership (satisfaction among those who shopped a dealership but purchased elsewhere). Buyer satisfaction is based on six factors (in order of importance): delivery process; dealer personnel; working out the deal; paperwork completion; dealership facility; and dealership website. Rejecter satisfaction is based on five factors: salesperson; price; facility; variety of inventory; and negotiation.

The 2025 U.S. Sales Satisfaction Index (SSI) Study is based on responses from 32,616 buyers who purchased or leased their new vehicle from March 2025 through May 2025. The study was fielded from July through September 2025.

For more information about the U.S. Sales Satisfaction Index (SSI) Study, visit https://www.jdpower.com/business/automotive/us-sales-satisfaction-index-ssi-study.

About J.D. Power

J.D. Power is a global leader in automotive data and analytics, and provides industry intelligence, consumer insights and advisory solutions to the automotive industry and selected non-automotive industries. J.D. Power leverages its extensive proprietary datasets and software capabilities combined with advanced analytics and artificial intelligence tools to help its clients optimize business performance.

J.D. Power was founded in 1968 and has offices in North America, Europe and Asia Pacific. To learn more about the company's business offerings, visit jdpower.com/business. The J.D. Power auto-shopping tool can be found at jdpower.com.

About J.D. Power and Advertising/Promotional Rules: https://www.jdpower.com/business/about-us/press-release-info

Contacts

Recent Quotes

View More
Symbol Price Change (%)
AMZN  244.41
+1.37 (0.56%)
AAPL  268.47
-1.30 (-0.48%)
AMD  233.54
-4.16 (-1.75%)
BAC  53.20
-0.09 (-0.17%)
GOOG  279.70
-5.64 (-1.98%)
META  621.71
+2.77 (0.45%)
MSFT  496.82
-0.28 (-0.06%)
NVDA  188.15
+0.07 (0.04%)
ORCL  239.26
-4.54 (-1.86%)
TSLA  429.52
-16.39 (-3.68%)
Stock Quote API & Stock News API supplied by www.cloudquote.io
Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes.
By accessing this page, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms Of Service.


 

IntelligentValue Home
Close Window

DISCLAIMER

All content herein is issued solely for informational purposes and is not to be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor should it be interpreted as a recommendation to buy, hold or sell (short or otherwise) any security.  All opinions, analyses, and information included herein are based on sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty of any kind, expressed or implied, is made including but not limited to any representation or warranty concerning accuracy, completeness, correctness, timeliness or appropriateness. We undertake no obligation to update such opinions, analysis or information. You should independently verify all information contained on this website. Some information is based on analysis of past performance or hypothetical performance results, which have inherent limitations. We make no representation that any particular equity or strategy will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. Shareholders, employees, writers, contractors, and affiliates associated with ETFOptimize.com may have ownership positions in the securities that are mentioned. If you are not sure if ETFs, algorithmic investing, or a particular investment is right for you, you are urged to consult with a Registered Investment Advisor (RIA). Neither this website nor anyone associated with producing its content are Registered Investment Advisors, and no attempt is made herein to substitute for personalized, professional investment advice. Neither ETFOptimize.com, Global Alpha Investments, Inc., nor its employees, service providers, associates, or affiliates are responsible for any investment losses you may incur as a result of using the information provided herein. Remember that past investment returns may not be indicative of future returns.

Copyright © 1998-2017 ETFOptimize.com, a publication of Optimized Investments, Inc. All rights reserved.