ETFOptimize | High-performance ETF-based Investment Strategies

Quantitative strategies, Wall Street-caliber research, and insightful market analysis since 1998.


ETFOptimize | HOME
Close Window

Auto Finance Websites and Mobile Apps Deliver Improved Customer Experience, but Critical Performance Gaps Persist, J.D. Power Finds

Mercedes-Benz Financial Services and Bank of America Each Rank Highest in Respective Segment

Auto loan customers are getting more mileage out of lender mobile apps and websites, but many providers still have a long way to go to bring their digital channels up to the standards customers have come to expect. According to the J.D. Power 2025 U.S. Automotive Finance Digital Experience Study,SM released today, automotive finance mobile app performance has improved industry-wide this year, but captive lenders are still far behind non-captive bank brands when it comes to delivering an exceptional digital experience.

“A great digital experience is becoming a crucial component of customer retention. As more vehicle shoppers start using artificial intelligence (AI) and other digital tools to shop for their next auto loan, it will be critical for lenders to have a meaningful digital connection with existing loan customers so they stay top-of-mind throughout that process,” said Patrick Roosenberg, senior director of automotive finance intelligence at J.D. Power. “Currently, the bank brands are outperforming captive lenders by virtue of the powerful digital tools they’ve developed across other parts of their businesses, but the playbook of best practices is starting to become much clearer and there are huge opportunities for improvement in this space.”

Following are some key findings of the 2025 study:

  • Non-captive mobile apps show significant improvement: Historically, auto lending mobile apps have trailed desktop sites in satisfaction and key metrics. That gap has closed among non-captive lenders, with an overall satisfaction score of 704 (on a 1,000-point scale) for mobile apps, which is two points higher than the overall satisfaction score for desktop websites. In the captive lender segment, however, desktop websites still outperform mobile apps, 703 vs. 684, respectively, a 19-point margin.
  • Non-captive apps outperform captive apps: Overall satisfaction among customers using non-captive mobile apps is 704, which is 20 points higher than among those using captive mobile apps (684). Captive app digital experiences also vary widely by brand. Non-captive lenders generally offer a more consistent user experience because they are developed using the bank’s mobile banking framework as a foundation.
  • Positive digital experiences yield increased digital usage: Among lenders with overall satisfaction scores of 800 or higher, 91% of customers say they “definitely will” reuse their lender’s desktop website and 89% say they “definitely will” reuse their lender’s mobile app in the future. That intent to reuse digital channels is nearly halved among customers who say they had a poor experience with their lender’s website or app.

“Channel consistency is still the name of the game in any digital financial services user experience,” said Jon Sundberg, senior director of digital solutions at J.D. Power. “Customers expect to have a seamless transition between websites, apps and offline communications, and brands that deliver that level of consistency and reliability are seeing steady improvement in their overall customer engagement, customer satisfaction and customer loyalty metrics.”

Study Ranking

Mercedes-Benz Financial Services ranks highest in digital experience satisfaction among captive lenders, with a score of 746. Audi Financial Services (740) ranks second and BMW Financial Services (727) ranks third.

Bank of America ranks highest in digital experience satisfaction among non-captive lenders, with a score of 741. Chase Auto (730) ranks second and Wells Fargo Auto (715) ranks third.

See the rank chart for each segment at http://www.jdpower.com/pr-id/2025166.

The U.S. Automotive Finance Digital Experience Study, now in its third year, evaluates customer satisfaction with auto finance websites and apps used to manage their accounts based on four criteria (in order of importance): visual appeal; information/content; navigation; and speed. The 2025 study is based on responses from 6,470 automotive finance customers who used their lender’s desktop website or mobile app. It was fielded in August-October 2025.

For more information about the U.S. Automotive Finance Digital Experience Study, visit https://www.jdpower.com/business/us-automotive-finance-digital-experience-study.

About J.D. Power

J.D. Power is a global leader in consumer insights, advisory services, and data and analytics. A pioneer in the use of big data, artificial intelligence (AI) and algorithmic modeling capabilities to understand consumer behavior, J.D. Power has been delivering incisive industry intelligence on customer interactions with brands and products for more than 55 years. The world's leading businesses across major industries rely on J.D. Power to guide their customer-facing strategies.

J.D. Power has offices in North America, Europe and Asia Pacific. To learn more about the company's business offerings, visit JDPower.com/business. The J.D. Power auto-shopping tool can be found at JDPower.com.

About J.D. Power and Advertising/Promotional Rules: www.jdpower.com/business/about-us/press-release-info

Contacts

Recent Quotes

View More
Symbol Price Change (%)
AMZN  222.56
+0.02 (0.01%)
AAPL  274.61
+0.50 (0.18%)
AMD  209.17
+1.59 (0.77%)
BAC  54.81
-0.52 (-0.94%)
GOOG  307.73
-1.59 (-0.51%)
META  657.15
+9.64 (1.49%)
MSFT  476.39
+1.57 (0.33%)
NVDA  177.72
+1.43 (0.81%)
ORCL  188.65
+3.73 (2.02%)
TSLA  489.88
+14.57 (3.07%)
Stock Quote API & Stock News API supplied by www.cloudquote.io
Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes.
By accessing this page, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms Of Service.


 

IntelligentValue Home
Close Window

DISCLAIMER

All content herein is issued solely for informational purposes and is not to be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor should it be interpreted as a recommendation to buy, hold or sell (short or otherwise) any security.  All opinions, analyses, and information included herein are based on sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty of any kind, expressed or implied, is made including but not limited to any representation or warranty concerning accuracy, completeness, correctness, timeliness or appropriateness. We undertake no obligation to update such opinions, analysis or information. You should independently verify all information contained on this website. Some information is based on analysis of past performance or hypothetical performance results, which have inherent limitations. We make no representation that any particular equity or strategy will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. Shareholders, employees, writers, contractors, and affiliates associated with ETFOptimize.com may have ownership positions in the securities that are mentioned. If you are not sure if ETFs, algorithmic investing, or a particular investment is right for you, you are urged to consult with a Registered Investment Advisor (RIA). Neither this website nor anyone associated with producing its content are Registered Investment Advisors, and no attempt is made herein to substitute for personalized, professional investment advice. Neither ETFOptimize.com, Global Alpha Investments, Inc., nor its employees, service providers, associates, or affiliates are responsible for any investment losses you may incur as a result of using the information provided herein. Remember that past investment returns may not be indicative of future returns.

Copyright © 1998-2017 ETFOptimize.com, a publication of Optimized Investments, Inc. All rights reserved.