ETFOptimize | High-performance ETF-based Investment Strategies

Quantitative strategies, Wall Street-caliber research, and insightful market analysis since 1998.


ETFOptimize | HOME
Close Window

Tesla Maintains Lead but Chinese Automakers Are Closing the Gap in New Wards Intelligence’s SDV Ranking

Wards Intelligence’s Software-Defined Vehicle (SDV) ranking, now part of Omdia, reveals that while Tesla still holds the overall lead, it has been surpassed in technological innovation by NIO and Xiaomi, which now occupy second and third place, respectively. The SDV concept represents a paradigm shift that has proven more complex than initially anticipated—particularly for established Western OEMs— but is advancing rapidly in China.

This press release features multimedia. View the full release here: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20250205794200/en/

SDV Quadrants Organizational Readiness vs Vehicle Platform Readiness (Graphic: Business Wire)

SDV Quadrants Organizational Readiness vs Vehicle Platform Readiness (Graphic: Business Wire)

Xpeng and Rivian rank third and fourth, respectively, completing the Leaders category. This category mainly consists of battery-electric-vehicle disruptors that are digitally native, prioritize a software-first approach, and are not constrained by legacy platforms, systems, or organizational culture. “Overall, this category includes automakers pushing the boundaries of SDV innovation, as well as those refining and scaling zonal architectures and other SDV-related technologies and practices,” said Maite Bezerra, Principal Analyst at Wards Intelligence, now part of Omdia.

In the Strong Contenders category—featuring Zeekr, Lucid, Leapmotor, and BMW, among others—67% of automakers are now actively commercializing SDVs, a notable shift from 2023 when most were limited to semi-SDVs. This underscores both the rapid growth of the SDV market and the intensifying competition within it. “Automakers in this category, such as BYD, are particularly well-positioned to challenge the current market leaders,” said Bezerra.

The Contenders category, including Hyundai, the Volkswagen Group, and General Motors, among others, saw an uptick in automakers deploying semi-SDVs and outlining more detailed SDV strategies. However, they still need to make substantial progress in bringing SDVs to production. Meanwhile, automakers in the Followers category—which previously included OEMs without a public SDV roadmap or specific timelines—have started setting clear SDV goals in response to the market’s swift evolution.

Measuring SDV progress remains challenging due to inconsistent definitions and lack of clear benchmarks. To address this, Wards Intelligence conducts annual primary and secondary research, utilizing advanced statistical tools to identify the most accurate indicators of SDV advancement. In this edition, 27 automakers were evaluated across five metrics: financial strength, portfolio complexity, vehicle platform readiness, organizational readiness, and SDV performance.

“Notably, 62% of the automakers in the Leaders and Strong Contenders categories are either Chinese or Chinese-owned, highlighting China’s increasing dominance in the SDV segment,” said Bezerra. “Furthermore, only three of the 14 automakers in these categories are Western incumbents. Both trends point to a continued shift toward Chinese leadership and ongoing challenges for Western automakers in 2025.”

ABOUT OMDIA

Omdia, part of Informa TechTarget, Inc. (Nasdaq: TTGT), is a technology research and advisory group. Our deep knowledge of tech markets combined with our actionable insights empower organizations to make smart growth decisions.

Contacts

Stock Quote API & Stock News API supplied by www.cloudquote.io
Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes.
By accessing this page, you agree to the following
Privacy Policy and Terms Of Service.


 

IntelligentValue Home
Close Window

DISCLAIMER

All content herein is issued solely for informational purposes and is not to be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor should it be interpreted as a recommendation to buy, hold or sell (short or otherwise) any security.  All opinions, analyses, and information included herein are based on sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty of any kind, expressed or implied, is made including but not limited to any representation or warranty concerning accuracy, completeness, correctness, timeliness or appropriateness. We undertake no obligation to update such opinions, analysis or information. You should independently verify all information contained on this website. Some information is based on analysis of past performance or hypothetical performance results, which have inherent limitations. We make no representation that any particular equity or strategy will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. Shareholders, employees, writers, contractors, and affiliates associated with ETFOptimize.com may have ownership positions in the securities that are mentioned. If you are not sure if ETFs, algorithmic investing, or a particular investment is right for you, you are urged to consult with a Registered Investment Advisor (RIA). Neither this website nor anyone associated with producing its content are Registered Investment Advisors, and no attempt is made herein to substitute for personalized, professional investment advice. Neither ETFOptimize.com, Global Alpha Investments, Inc., nor its employees, service providers, associates, or affiliates are responsible for any investment losses you may incur as a result of using the information provided herein. Remember that past investment returns may not be indicative of future returns.

Copyright © 1998-2017 ETFOptimize.com, a publication of Optimized Investments, Inc. All rights reserved.