ETFOptimize | High-performance ETF-based Investment Strategies

Quantitative strategies, Wall Street-caliber research, and insightful market analysis since 1998.


ETFOptimize | HOME
Close Window

SBSB Eastham Secures Take-Nothing Judgment on Behalf of FedEx Freight in $7.5 Million Service Center Dispute

Lawsuit hinged on erroneous claims that FedEx Freight failed to maintain the property

In a complete defense victory, Schouest, Bamdas, Soshea, BenMaier & Eastham PLLC (SBSB Eastham) has secured a take-nothing judgment for its client FedEx Freight, Inc. in a lawsuit filed by the Florida-based company Zamindari Real Estate Investment One, LLC. The plaintiffs were seeking more than $7.5 million in damages claiming FedEx had failed to maintain a leased service center facility in Corpus Christi, Texas, claims the defendants vigorously denied.

When Zamindari purchased the property in question in 2013, FedEx Freight was the sole tenant, occupying a large warehouse and office building. The service center was built the year prior by the previous owner as part of a lease agreement and construction rider with FedEx.

Once Zamindari took ownership, the company complained to its tenant that parts of the service center needed repair, including a sticking door, parts of the asphalt, roof, and other minor interior cosmetic problems along the front of the building. The two sides disagreed about which party was responsible for those repairs.

Upon closer inspection by an engineering consultant, these issues were determined to have been caused by shifts in the facility’s foundation due to soil moisture. The plaintiffs contended in the subsequent lawsuit that FedEx’s refusal to cover the repairs led to the extent of the damage and sought monetary damages for repairs as well as attorneys’ fees.

FedEx contended that there was no contract regarding structural damage or upkeep between the two parties, that it did nothing to cause the damage, that it complied fully with the lease agreement, and that the plaintiff was solely responsible for addressing the issues with the property.

After a full trial, the jury unanimously found in favor of FedEx Freight, resulting in a take-nothing judgment — meaning Zamindari recovered zero damages.

This outcome highlights the outstanding advocacy of SBSB Eastham partner Don Jones and FedEx in-house counsel Rob Ratton and Shelby Walton.

“The facts of the case were on our side from the start, and we are pleased that the jury saw that,” said Mr. Jones. “We maintained throughout the case that our clients had honored the terms of the lease but were not going to be forced to cover costs that were not their legal responsibility.”

The case is Zamindari Real Estate Investment One, LLC v. FedEx Freight, Inc., Cause No. 2019-DCV-6141-D, in the 105th Judicial District Court of Nueces County, Texas.

About Schouest, Bamdas, Soshea, BenMaier & Eastham PLLC

SBSB Eastham is a group of experienced attorneys who have come together to form a law firm focused on client needs. The firm’s goal is to be the go-to resource at every stage of the legal process, bringing deeper experience, deeper commitment and deeper insights to help solve the most complex issues. In consultation or in the courtroom, the firm will aggressively pursue a client’s best interests. For more information about the firm and its team of attorneys, visit www.sbsb-eastham.com.

Contacts

Recent Quotes

View More
Symbol Price Change (%)
AMZN  244.41
+1.37 (0.56%)
AAPL  268.47
-1.30 (-0.48%)
AMD  233.54
-4.16 (-1.75%)
BAC  53.20
-0.09 (-0.17%)
GOOG  279.70
-5.64 (-1.98%)
META  621.71
+2.77 (0.45%)
MSFT  496.82
-0.28 (-0.06%)
NVDA  188.15
+0.07 (0.04%)
ORCL  239.26
-4.54 (-1.86%)
TSLA  429.52
-16.39 (-3.68%)
Stock Quote API & Stock News API supplied by www.cloudquote.io
Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes.
By accessing this page, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms Of Service.


 

IntelligentValue Home
Close Window

DISCLAIMER

All content herein is issued solely for informational purposes and is not to be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor should it be interpreted as a recommendation to buy, hold or sell (short or otherwise) any security.  All opinions, analyses, and information included herein are based on sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty of any kind, expressed or implied, is made including but not limited to any representation or warranty concerning accuracy, completeness, correctness, timeliness or appropriateness. We undertake no obligation to update such opinions, analysis or information. You should independently verify all information contained on this website. Some information is based on analysis of past performance or hypothetical performance results, which have inherent limitations. We make no representation that any particular equity or strategy will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. Shareholders, employees, writers, contractors, and affiliates associated with ETFOptimize.com may have ownership positions in the securities that are mentioned. If you are not sure if ETFs, algorithmic investing, or a particular investment is right for you, you are urged to consult with a Registered Investment Advisor (RIA). Neither this website nor anyone associated with producing its content are Registered Investment Advisors, and no attempt is made herein to substitute for personalized, professional investment advice. Neither ETFOptimize.com, Global Alpha Investments, Inc., nor its employees, service providers, associates, or affiliates are responsible for any investment losses you may incur as a result of using the information provided herein. Remember that past investment returns may not be indicative of future returns.

Copyright © 1998-2017 ETFOptimize.com, a publication of Optimized Investments, Inc. All rights reserved.