ETFOptimize | High-performance ETF-based Investment Strategies

Quantitative strategies, Wall Street-caliber research, and insightful market analysis since 1998.


ETFOptimize | HOME
Close Window

Direct Banks Continue to Satisfy Customers by Supporting Them in Challenging Economic Times, J.D. Power Finds

Charles Schwab Bank Ranks Highest in Both Checking and Savings Segments

Despite not having branches and interacting with customers primarily through digital channels, direct banks are outperforming traditional retail banks, along with making customers feel supported during challenging times. According to the J.D. Power 2025 U.S. Direct Banking Satisfaction Study,SM released today, overall customer satisfaction with direct bank checking accounts is 692 (on a 1,000-point scale), which is 24 points higher than the average regional bank and 35 points higher than national banks. Savings account satisfaction is even higher (705), which is 89 points higher than regional banks and 98 points higher than national banks.

“Customers of online-only direct banks have higher levels of satisfaction because these banks make them feel supported during challenging times,” said Paul McAdam, senior director of banking and payments intelligence at J.D. Power. “Direct banks do this by enabling customers to grow their money, access credit when needed, improve their creditworthiness and by helping customers manage their spending or budget. Direct banks further improved customers’ feelings of being supported during challenging times by making it easy to access customer service; delivering great app and web experiences; and making sure customers fully understand products and services. Making customers feel supported during challenging times drives a huge bump in customer satisfaction, and the top-performing direct banks are delivering these experiences consistently.”

Following are some key findings of the 2025 study:

  • Checking satisfaction increases while savings satisfaction declines: The overall customer satisfaction score for direct bank checking accounts is 692, up 4 points from 2024. Overall satisfaction for direct bank savings accounts is 705, down 5 points from 2024. Both scores are still far higher than the average overall satisfaction scores for midsize banks, regional banks, national banks and neobanks.
  • Support during challenging times drives satisfaction scores: The key performance indicator of “bank completely supports me during challenging times,” is responsible for a 73-point rise in checking account satisfaction and an 84-point rise in savings account satisfaction when banks hit the mark. When direct banks achieve these gains, customers reward the banks with higher utilization of direct deposit, higher investment account and credit card ownership, and a lower likelihood of moving deposits to another financial institution.
  • Bank support resonating with younger customers: Members of Gen Z1 and Gen Y have the highest year-over-year increase in perceived level of direct bank support. Boomers believe their overall level of direct bank support has declined year over year.

Study Rankings

Charles Schwab Bank ranks highest in overall satisfaction among checking providers with a score of 740, marking the seventh consecutive year of being top ranked in the study. American Express (711) ranks second and Ally (694) ranks third.

Charles Schwab Bank ranks highest in overall satisfaction among savings providers with a score of 748. American Express (737) ranks second and Marcus by Goldman Sachs (735) ranks third.

See the rank chart for each segment at http://www.jdpower.com/pr-id/2025041.

The U.S. Direct Banking Satisfaction Study, now in its ninth year, measures overall satisfaction with direct bank and neobank checking and/or savings/money market products based on six dimensions (in alphabetical order): customer service; ease of moving money; helps grow money; level of trust; managing account via mobile app and managing account via website. The study defines direct banks as online/branchless institutions with federal banking charters, with either the Federal Reserve Board, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) or the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as their primary regulator. It is based on responses from 9,391 direct bank customers and was fielded from December 2024 through March 2025.

To learn more about the U.S. Direct Banking Satisfaction Study, visit https://www.jdpower.com/business/us-direct-banking-satisfaction-study.

About J.D. Power

J.D. Power is a global leader in consumer insights, advisory services, and data and analytics. A pioneer in the use of big data, artificial intelligence (AI) and algorithmic modeling capabilities to understand consumer behavior, J.D. Power has been delivering incisive industry intelligence on customer interactions with brands and products for more than 55 years. The world's leading businesses across major industries rely on J.D. Power to guide their customer-facing strategies.

J.D. Power has offices in North America, Europe and Asia Pacific. To learn more about the company's business offerings, visit JDPower.com/business. The J.D. Power auto-shopping tool can be found at JDPower.com.

About J.D. Power and Advertising/Promotional Rules: www.jdpower.com/business/about-us/press-release-info

1 J.D. Power defines generational groups as Pre-Boomers (born before 1946); Boomers (1946-1964); Gen X (1965-1976); Gen Y (1977-1994); and Gen Z (1995-2006). Millennials (1982-1994) are a subset of Gen Y.

Contacts

Stock Quote API & Stock News API supplied by www.cloudquote.io
Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes.
By accessing this page, you agree to the following
Privacy Policy and Terms Of Service.


 

IntelligentValue Home
Close Window

DISCLAIMER

All content herein is issued solely for informational purposes and is not to be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor should it be interpreted as a recommendation to buy, hold or sell (short or otherwise) any security.  All opinions, analyses, and information included herein are based on sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty of any kind, expressed or implied, is made including but not limited to any representation or warranty concerning accuracy, completeness, correctness, timeliness or appropriateness. We undertake no obligation to update such opinions, analysis or information. You should independently verify all information contained on this website. Some information is based on analysis of past performance or hypothetical performance results, which have inherent limitations. We make no representation that any particular equity or strategy will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. Shareholders, employees, writers, contractors, and affiliates associated with ETFOptimize.com may have ownership positions in the securities that are mentioned. If you are not sure if ETFs, algorithmic investing, or a particular investment is right for you, you are urged to consult with a Registered Investment Advisor (RIA). Neither this website nor anyone associated with producing its content are Registered Investment Advisors, and no attempt is made herein to substitute for personalized, professional investment advice. Neither ETFOptimize.com, Global Alpha Investments, Inc., nor its employees, service providers, associates, or affiliates are responsible for any investment losses you may incur as a result of using the information provided herein. Remember that past investment returns may not be indicative of future returns.

Copyright © 1998-2017 ETFOptimize.com, a publication of Optimized Investments, Inc. All rights reserved.