ETFOptimize | High-performance ETF-based Investment Strategies

Quantitative strategies, Wall Street-caliber research, and insightful market analysis since 1998.


ETFOptimize | HOME
Close Window

Marin Katusa: What a return to the gold standard would mean for the price of the precious metal

Marin Katusa: What a return to the gold standard would mean for the price of the precious metal

Reprinted from the Katusa’s Investment Insights newsletter

Did you catch Warren Buffett’s retirement warning?

“Obviously, we wouldn’t want to be owning anything that we thought was in a currency that was really going to hell,” Buffett said. “There could be things that happen in the U.S. that make us want to own a lot of other currencies.”

It’s no secret that the goal of Project 2025 is to reshape the structure of the U.S. government. But most people have no idea just how rapidly the 900+ page Project 2025 playbook is being made law—or what’s planned for the next few months.

Coming up very quickly on the Project 2025 agenda: a reversal of President Nixon’s 1971 repeal of the gold standard. Chapter 24 of the playbook outlines specific plans to make two dramatic moves: Rein in the Federal Reserve (you’ve already seen this begin to unfold) and bring the gold standard back (this process is already beginning), possibly on the way to “free banking.”

Prior to the “Nixon Shock,” the U.S. saw several iterations of the gold standard — in fact, this is the longest it’s gone without a major currency iteration.

As the U.S. has slowly shifted away from a true gold standard, inflation has risen—and growth has declined. If the growth from the ‘70s was maintained through today, median income would be $40,000 higher than it is. And the economy would be 20% larger, or $5 trillion.

With a single stroke of a Sharpie, the current administration could achieve several of its most desired and difficult objectives:

  • Limit the amount that the money supply can grow—reining in government spending
  • Curb inflation, the great enemy of the incumbent
  • Completely neuter the Federal Reserve
  • A return to the gold standard has support at the highest levels

The color of winning

There may be nothing President Donald Trump likes more than gold. He himself made a 400% return by investing in gold in the ‘70s, calling it “easier than the construction business.” But he doesn’t just love gold. He actively agrees with Project 2025—and sees the gold standard as positive for the U.S. Here he is in separate interviews:

  • “We used to have a very, very solid country because it was based on a gold standard.”
  • “Bringing back the gold standard … boy, would it be wonderful. We’d have a standard on which to base our money.”

The current leaders have uncovered a pathway to make that true. The M.O. of the current administration is to find a loophole—some arcane, barely relevant historical precedent—and exploit it. And they’ve found just the one.

In his address, President Nixon indicated that the U.S. would not permanently go off the gold standard: “I have directed Secretary Connelly to suspend temporarily the convertibility of the dollar into gold.”

According to former Trump chief strategist Steve Bannon, that order is “going to be reviewed strongly in the second term… Talk about getting rid of the Fed, maybe you start with converting back to gold.”

Roosevelt and Nixon, who both helped take the U.S. off the gold standard, used executive orders and proclamations to do so. The current administration feels that it may do the same to bring it back.

Time to buy gold?

Any route taken to return to the gold standard would have an immense impact on demand for and the price of gold. Under a return to the gold standard, what would the new price of gold be?

The final few iterations of the gold standard in the U.S. used a fractional reserve system, just like banks do with money. So the answer must consider what percentage is used for that fractional reserve system.

Skip the next two lines if you’re not a numbers person…

  • There are 261 million ounces of gold in U.S. reserves.
  • At $3,400/oz, that’s worth about $900 billion.

There is about $19 trillion in M1 money supply outstanding, which means current reserves would back 4.8% of the money supply. To back just 10% of the M1 money supply would require gold to double in value. At 50% backing, gold would have to rise 10x from its current level.

The alternative is for current reserves to grow. The U.S. would need more than 2 billion ounces to get to 100% backing at current gold values — or about 1/3 of all gold ever mined. That would have a similar effect on the price of gold.

But the math is not important. What’s important is this: Any effort to return to the gold standard is going to send gold through the roof—and those efforts are already here. The groundwork is already being laid. And investors will seek refuge in gold anyway, as they always have.

P.S. one of my major gold holdings is up 60% in the last two months. And I think it has much, much further to run. To get the name of the company, become a subscriber to Katusa’s Resource Opportunities today.

More from Marin Katusa: Gold is erupting and you can still cash in

Stock Quote API & Stock News API supplied by www.cloudquote.io
Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes.
By accessing this page, you agree to the following
Privacy Policy and Terms Of Service.


 

IntelligentValue Home
Close Window

DISCLAIMER

All content herein is issued solely for informational purposes and is not to be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor should it be interpreted as a recommendation to buy, hold or sell (short or otherwise) any security.  All opinions, analyses, and information included herein are based on sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty of any kind, expressed or implied, is made including but not limited to any representation or warranty concerning accuracy, completeness, correctness, timeliness or appropriateness. We undertake no obligation to update such opinions, analysis or information. You should independently verify all information contained on this website. Some information is based on analysis of past performance or hypothetical performance results, which have inherent limitations. We make no representation that any particular equity or strategy will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. Shareholders, employees, writers, contractors, and affiliates associated with ETFOptimize.com may have ownership positions in the securities that are mentioned. If you are not sure if ETFs, algorithmic investing, or a particular investment is right for you, you are urged to consult with a Registered Investment Advisor (RIA). Neither this website nor anyone associated with producing its content are Registered Investment Advisors, and no attempt is made herein to substitute for personalized, professional investment advice. Neither ETFOptimize.com, Global Alpha Investments, Inc., nor its employees, service providers, associates, or affiliates are responsible for any investment losses you may incur as a result of using the information provided herein. Remember that past investment returns may not be indicative of future returns.

Copyright © 1998-2017 ETFOptimize.com, a publication of Optimized Investments, Inc. All rights reserved.