ETFOptimize | High-performance ETF-based Investment Strategies

Quantitative strategies, Wall Street-caliber research, and insightful market analysis since 1998.


ETFOptimize | HOME
Close Window

NCLA Asks SCOTUS to Resolve Circuit Split over Timing of Due Process Suits in Property Disputes

Washington, DC, Nov. 18, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The New Civil Liberties Alliance has filed an amicus curiae brief urging the Supreme Court to hear Potter v. Incorporated Village of Ocean Beach and determine when the statute of limitations begins to run for Americans who have to sue local governments for denying them due process of law in connection with violating their property rights. The Justices should rule that the statutory time limit for filing claims of due process violations in land use disputes begins to run only once the government denies due process of law to contest property rights matters, rather than when someone is first deprived of the property interest. NCLA asks the Supreme Court to resolve the entrenched disagreement between several circuit courts of appeals on this issue, so local governments can no longer use administrative delay tactics to freely interfere with Americans’ property rights.

As early as 2011, Ocean Beach, New York began expressing intent to revoke Mr. Potter’s occupancy certificate for a house there. A hearing officer recommended revoking the certificate in 2014, but the Village Board voted to table the matter indefinitely the next year. Potter has long demanded an administrative hearing about the certificate’s revocation, but the Village did not make clear that it was refusing to grant any such hearing until after the revocation was confirmed to have occurred. Indeed, when Potter filed suit in New York state court in August 2019, seeking a declaration that his certificate of occupancy remained valid, the Village Board argued that the suit was premature because it had not yet decided whether to revoke the certificate and that a process remained available by which he could seek resolution. Ocean Beach only officially asserted that it had definitively decided to revoke the certificate in late 2020 at the earliest.

In August 2023, Potter filed a lawsuit against Ocean Beach that claimed the Village denied him the procedural due process he deserved under the Fourteenth Amendment when it revoked the certificate. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed a district court’s dismissal of the lawsuit for failing timely to file.

The Second Circuit wrongly found that the three-year window for filing due process claims begins to run when government “inflicts an actual, concrete injury,” deciding that this had occurred in Potter’s case when the certificate was revoked (more than three years before he filed). The Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, Ninth and Tenth Circuits all agree that the filing window only begins after the government declines to provide someone with due process of law in cases like this. The Supreme Court should agree with those circuits and decide that Potter’s lawsuit was timely filed, setting a standard for all similar disputes nationwide.

NCLA released the following statements:

“The Second Circuit’s accrual rule will often lead to unnecessary duplicative litigation. It forces property owners faced with statute-of-limitations concerns to file federal court actions while simultaneously pursuing the processes made available to them in state judicial or administrative proceedings.”
— Rich Samp, Counsel of Record

“The Second Circuit is among a tiny minority of circuits that makes it exceedingly difficult for people whose due process rights have been denied to figure out when to sue. The Supreme Court should hear this case, resolve this circuit split, and decide that the statute of limitations does not begin to run until due process has been denied.”
— Mark Chenoweth, President, NCLA

For more information visit the amicus page here.

ABOUT NCLA

NCLA is a nonpartisan, nonprofit civil rights group founded by prominent legal scholar Philip Hamburger to protect constitutional freedoms from violations by the Administrative State. NCLA’s public-interest litigation and other pro bono advocacy strive to tame the unlawful power of state and federal agencies and to foster a new civil liberties movement that will help restore Americans’ fundamental rights.


Joe Martyak
New Civil Liberties Alliance
703-403-1111
joe.martyak@ncla.legal

Recent Quotes

View More
Symbol Price Change (%)
AMZN  220.69
+3.55 (1.63%)
AAPL  271.49
+5.24 (1.97%)
AMD  203.78
-2.24 (-1.09%)
BAC  51.56
+0.56 (1.10%)
GOOG  299.65
+9.67 (3.33%)
META  594.25
+5.10 (0.87%)
MSFT  472.12
-6.31 (-1.32%)
NVDA  178.88
-1.76 (-0.97%)
ORCL  198.76
-11.93 (-5.66%)
TSLA  391.09
-4.14 (-1.05%)
Stock Quote API & Stock News API supplied by www.cloudquote.io
Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes.
By accessing this page, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms Of Service.


 

IntelligentValue Home
Close Window

DISCLAIMER

All content herein is issued solely for informational purposes and is not to be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor should it be interpreted as a recommendation to buy, hold or sell (short or otherwise) any security.  All opinions, analyses, and information included herein are based on sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty of any kind, expressed or implied, is made including but not limited to any representation or warranty concerning accuracy, completeness, correctness, timeliness or appropriateness. We undertake no obligation to update such opinions, analysis or information. You should independently verify all information contained on this website. Some information is based on analysis of past performance or hypothetical performance results, which have inherent limitations. We make no representation that any particular equity or strategy will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. Shareholders, employees, writers, contractors, and affiliates associated with ETFOptimize.com may have ownership positions in the securities that are mentioned. If you are not sure if ETFs, algorithmic investing, or a particular investment is right for you, you are urged to consult with a Registered Investment Advisor (RIA). Neither this website nor anyone associated with producing its content are Registered Investment Advisors, and no attempt is made herein to substitute for personalized, professional investment advice. Neither ETFOptimize.com, Global Alpha Investments, Inc., nor its employees, service providers, associates, or affiliates are responsible for any investment losses you may incur as a result of using the information provided herein. Remember that past investment returns may not be indicative of future returns.

Copyright © 1998-2017 ETFOptimize.com, a publication of Optimized Investments, Inc. All rights reserved.