ETFOptimize | High-performance ETF-based Investment Strategies

Quantitative strategies, Wall Street-caliber research, and insightful market analysis since 1998.


ETFOptimize | HOME
Close Window

NCLA Persuades Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to Scrap Illegal Speech Restriction Proposal

Washington, DC, Nov. 20, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has withdrawn its 2022 proposed “Duty of Candor” Rule, as the New Civil Liberties Alliance advised in scathing official comments. The Rule would have required anyone communicating with the Commission, its staff, or related authorities—about any topic within the Commission’s jurisdiction (e.g., energy policy or related environmental matters)—to “submit accurate and factual information and not submit false or misleading information or omit material information.” The Rule lacked a mens rea requirement limiting its application to intentional falsehoods, and it did not have a materiality threshold. So, under the Rule, any speaker—regardless of sophistication or legal resources—could have been penalized unless the Commission determined that they had “exercised due diligence” to avoid making a “false” or “misleading” statement. And the Commission alone could have decided what speech qualified as false or misleading and how much diligence would have been enough. NCLA commends the Commission for abandoning this dangerously vague and sweeping regulation that threatened to chill core First Amendment rights to speak freely and to petition the government.

The proposed Rule would have expanded an existing, substantially narrower duty of candor applicable only to wholesale electric power sellers, transforming it into a sweeping mandate covering every member of the public. By restricting speech based on its content, the proposed Rule triggered strict scrutiny under the First Amendment, yet the Commission never showed that it was “narrowly tailored to serve compelling state interests.” The government cannot strip speech of First Amendment protection merely by branding it “false” or “misleading.”

The proposed Rule would have chilled constitutionally protected speech, as honest parties who otherwise might have communicated with the Commission would have faced the threat of punishment for even inadvertent or immaterial mistakes, undermining the very communications the Rule purported to promote. Compounding the problem, the Biden-era Commission failed to define or clarify to any meaningful degree what speech (or omission of speech) would qualify as breaking the rule, leaving regulated parties to guess what statements might be sanctioned—a plain violation of due process. The proposed Rule also would have threatened attorney-client privilege by implicitly requiring lawyers to divulge undefined (and potentially privileged) “material information” in their communications with the Commission or a related authority. The Commission never identified the penalties or procedures to be followed in the case of a violation of the proposed Rule, further depriving the public of any meaningful opportunity to comment on its full implications, as the Administrative Procedure Act requires.

NCLA released the following statements:

“FERC’s proposed ‘duty of candor’ rule was a solution in search of a problem, and the cure was far worse than the purported disease. Members of the public have every right to freely discuss energy policy without looking over their shoulders, wondering whether the government will punish them for it.”
— Casey Norman, Litigation Counsel, NCLA

“The proposed duty of candor rule should have been called the ‘chill ordinary Americans from filing comments with a federal agency rule’ because that is what it would have done. Thankfully, NCLA’s comment and promise to sue FERC if this rule were ever promulgated stopped it in its tracks in 2022. NCLA is glad to see the Trump Administration formally scrapping the proposal.”
— Mark Chenoweth, President, NCLA

For more information visit the comments page here.

ABOUT NCLA

NCLA is a nonpartisan, nonprofit civil rights group founded by prominent legal scholar Philip Hamburger to protect constitutional freedoms from violations by the Administrative State. NCLA’s public-interest litigation and other pro bono advocacy strive to tame the unlawful power of state and federal agencies and to foster a new civil liberties movement that will help restore Americans’ fundamental rights.


Joe Martyak
New Civil Liberties Alliance
703-403-1111
joe.martyak@ncla.legal

Recent Quotes

View More
Symbol Price Change (%)
AMZN  220.69
+3.55 (1.63%)
AAPL  271.49
+5.24 (1.97%)
AMD  203.78
-2.24 (-1.09%)
BAC  51.56
+0.56 (1.10%)
GOOG  299.65
+9.67 (3.33%)
META  594.25
+5.10 (0.87%)
MSFT  472.12
-6.31 (-1.32%)
NVDA  178.88
-1.76 (-0.97%)
ORCL  198.76
-11.93 (-5.66%)
TSLA  391.09
-4.14 (-1.05%)
Stock Quote API & Stock News API supplied by www.cloudquote.io
Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes.
By accessing this page, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms Of Service.


 

IntelligentValue Home
Close Window

DISCLAIMER

All content herein is issued solely for informational purposes and is not to be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor should it be interpreted as a recommendation to buy, hold or sell (short or otherwise) any security.  All opinions, analyses, and information included herein are based on sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty of any kind, expressed or implied, is made including but not limited to any representation or warranty concerning accuracy, completeness, correctness, timeliness or appropriateness. We undertake no obligation to update such opinions, analysis or information. You should independently verify all information contained on this website. Some information is based on analysis of past performance or hypothetical performance results, which have inherent limitations. We make no representation that any particular equity or strategy will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. Shareholders, employees, writers, contractors, and affiliates associated with ETFOptimize.com may have ownership positions in the securities that are mentioned. If you are not sure if ETFs, algorithmic investing, or a particular investment is right for you, you are urged to consult with a Registered Investment Advisor (RIA). Neither this website nor anyone associated with producing its content are Registered Investment Advisors, and no attempt is made herein to substitute for personalized, professional investment advice. Neither ETFOptimize.com, Global Alpha Investments, Inc., nor its employees, service providers, associates, or affiliates are responsible for any investment losses you may incur as a result of using the information provided herein. Remember that past investment returns may not be indicative of future returns.

Copyright © 1998-2017 ETFOptimize.com, a publication of Optimized Investments, Inc. All rights reserved.