ETFOptimize | High-performance ETF-based Investment Strategies

Quantitative strategies, Wall Street-caliber research, and insightful market analysis since 1998.


ETFOptimize | HOME
Close Window

NCLA Asks Supreme Court to Decide District Courts Cannot Reinstate Fired Executive Branch Officials

Washington, DC, April 14, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The New Civil Liberties Alliance filed an amicus curiae brief today urging the U.S. Supreme Court to stay district court injunctions purporting to reinstate National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) Chair Gwynne Wilcox and Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) Chair Cathy Harris after President Donald Trump fired them. The President has absolute constitutional authority to remove executive branch officers, which includes NLRB and MSPB members. NCLA encouraged the Justices to grant certiorari and review the injunctions in Wilcox and Harris’s cases without waiting for an appeals court to do so, to resolve this recurring problem before district courts order still more fired Executive Branch officials to be reinstated.

The Constitution vests all executive power in the President. That grant of power is complete and exclusive. It necessarily carries with it the authority to appoint, oversee, direct, and, when necessary, remove officers who wield executive power in the President’s name. Of course, the President must delegate executive authority to subordinates to run the day-to-day operations of the Executive Branch. But those officers exercise executive powers on behalf of the President and so must remain under his control. As the Supreme Court recently held in Seila Law v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the President maintains authority to both “supervise and remove the agents who wield executive power in his stead.” That removal authority must be absolute for the President to uphold his constitutional duty to “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.”

The threat of removal is the only certain way the President can control those to whom he delegates such power, ensuring that their actions or inactions remain consistent with his policies and priorities. A federal district court judge lacks the power to enter an injunction that stops the President from firing his subordinate—let alone one that forces that person’s reinstatement. Any appointee so reinstated would owe her position to the judge, not to the President, which would cause her loyalties to be divided (at best) and would remove her incentive to heed the President’s policies. For this reason, prior lawsuits from fired federal officials sought back pay, not reinstatement. The district judges in the Wilcox and Harris cases overreached mightily by usurping executive power.

NCLA released the following statements:

“If President Truman’s famous desk sign, ‘The Buck Stops Here,’ is correct, then the President must be able to remove officers who purport to exercise executive power on his behalf. Otherwise, the buck would stop somewhere else entirely—namely the desks of subordinate officers.”
— Sheng Li, Litigation Counsel, NCLA

“It is long past time for the Supreme Court to recognize the basic constitutional truth—there is only one Executive Branch headed by the President. There is no ‘fourth branch’ of government. Therefore, anyone who exercises any executive power must be responsible to the President who is, in turn, responsible to the American people.”
— Greg Dolin, Senior Litigation Counsel, NCLA

“Article II of the Constitution grants the executive power to the President. The executive power encompasses the power to appoint officials and the power to remove officials. The Constitution then cabins the President’s ability to appoint officers, for example by requiring advice and consent from the U.S. Senate for some appointments. However, the Constitution does not constrain the removal power at all, so it remains absolute and unlimited.”
— Mark Chenoweth, President, NCLA

For more information visit the amicus page here.

ABOUT NCLA

NCLA is a nonpartisan, nonprofit civil rights group founded by prominent legal scholar Philip Hamburger to protect constitutional freedoms from violations by the Administrative State. NCLA’s public-interest litigation and other pro bono advocacy strive to tame the unlawful power of state and federal agencies and to foster a new civil liberties movement that will help restore Americans’ fundamental rights.
###


Joe Martyak
New Civil Liberties Alliance
703-403-1111
joe.martyak@ncla.legal
Stock Quote API & Stock News API supplied by www.cloudquote.io
Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes.
By accessing this page, you agree to the following
Privacy Policy and Terms Of Service.


 

IntelligentValue Home
Close Window

DISCLAIMER

All content herein is issued solely for informational purposes and is not to be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor should it be interpreted as a recommendation to buy, hold or sell (short or otherwise) any security.  All opinions, analyses, and information included herein are based on sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty of any kind, expressed or implied, is made including but not limited to any representation or warranty concerning accuracy, completeness, correctness, timeliness or appropriateness. We undertake no obligation to update such opinions, analysis or information. You should independently verify all information contained on this website. Some information is based on analysis of past performance or hypothetical performance results, which have inherent limitations. We make no representation that any particular equity or strategy will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. Shareholders, employees, writers, contractors, and affiliates associated with ETFOptimize.com may have ownership positions in the securities that are mentioned. If you are not sure if ETFs, algorithmic investing, or a particular investment is right for you, you are urged to consult with a Registered Investment Advisor (RIA). Neither this website nor anyone associated with producing its content are Registered Investment Advisors, and no attempt is made herein to substitute for personalized, professional investment advice. Neither ETFOptimize.com, Global Alpha Investments, Inc., nor its employees, service providers, associates, or affiliates are responsible for any investment losses you may incur as a result of using the information provided herein. Remember that past investment returns may not be indicative of future returns.

Copyright © 1998-2017 ETFOptimize.com, a publication of Optimized Investments, Inc. All rights reserved.